NUMERICAL CONTROLLER FOR CONTROLLING COLLISION POSITION OF CUTTER TIP OF TOOL AND WORKPIECE

Abstract

A tool center path is compensated so that the number of collisions with a workpiece in positions on cutter tips complies with use frequencies in cutter tip information, based on tool information including the diameter of a tool and the number of cutter tips attached to the tool, a tool center movement path specified by a machining program, workpiece shape data, and cutter tip information.

Claims

1. A numerical controller which controls a machine, which is configured so that a workpiece and a tool are relatively moved for machining by a drive mechanism and a spindle for rotating the tool, based on a machining program for specifying a movement path of the center of the tool, the numerical controller comprising: a tool storage unit configured to store tool information including the diameter of the tool and the number of cutter tips attached to the tool; a cutter tip information storage unit configured to store usable ranges of the cutter tips and use frequencies in positions within the usable ranges of the cutter tips; a workpiece shape data storage unit configured to store workpiece shape data indicative of a shape of the workpiece; and a compensation unit configured to generate a compensated tool path, which is a compensated version of the tool center path, so that the number of collisions with the workpiece in positions on the cutter tips complies with the use frequencies, based on the tool information, the tool center movement path specified by the machining program, the workpiece shape data, and the cutter tip information.

2. The numerical controller according to claim 1, further comprising an engage angle information storage means for storing engage angle information including usable ranges of engage angles at which the cutter tips collide with the workpiece and use frequencies at the engage angles within the usable ranges thereof, wherein the compensation unit is configured to generate a compensated tool path, which is a compensated version of the tool center path, so that the number of collisions with the workpiece at the engage angles of the cutter tips complies with the use frequencies, based on the tool information, the tool center movement path specified by the machining program, the workpiece shape data, and the engage angle information.

3. The numerical controller according to claim 1, comprising a spindle load current tolerance storage unit configured to store a spindle load current tolerance, which is a maximum allowable value of a spindle load current during cutting, wherein a spindle load current value during actual machining along a compensated tool path obtained by compensation by the compensation unit is acquired such that the spindle load current value and the spindle load current tolerance are compared and the compensated tool path is further compensated based on the result of the comparison.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] The above and other objects and features of the present invention will be obvious from the ensuing description of embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0015] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating compensation of a tool center path in face milling according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0016] FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram of a numerical controller according to the present embodiment;

[0017] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating tool information on a tool with a cutter tip;

[0018] FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating cutter tip information;

[0019] FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating parameters for cutting in the face milling by the tool;

[0020] FIG. 6A is a diagram illustrating a lower end position for compensation in a tool center position;

[0021] FIG. 6B is a diagram illustrating an upper end position for the compensation in the tool center position;

[0022] FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a compensation range for the tool center position;

[0023] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating compensation points according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0024] FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing processing performed on the numerical controller according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0025] FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing processing performed on the numerical controller according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0026] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a table stored with compensation points and positions on the cutter tip according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0027] FIG. 12 is a schematic configuration diagram of a numerical controller according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0028] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a compensation method according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0029] FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a compensation method according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0030] FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating a tolerance of a spindle load current;

[0031] FIG. 16 is a schematic configuration diagram of a numerical controller according to the embodiment of the present invention;

[0032] FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing processing performed on the numerical controller according to the embodiment of the present invention; and

[0033] FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating a conventional technique.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0034] This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-193278, filed Sep. 30, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

[0035] An embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0036] In face milling using a tool with a cutter tip, according to the present embodiment, the position of the tool is compensated perpendicularly relative to a programmed tool center path so that collision positions of the cutter tip and a workpiece are not concentrated to specific positions on the cutter tip, as shown in FIG. 1.

[0037] According to the present embodiment, there is provided a numerical controller in which a tool path such that the collision positions of the cutter tip and the workpiece are not concentrated to specific positions on the cutter tip is generated based on information on the tool with the cutter tip used for face milling, shape information of the workpiece, and information on the working range of the cutter tip.

[0038] FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram of the numerical controller according to the present embodiment. A numerical controller 1 of the present embodiment comprises a command analysis unit 2, interpolation unit 3, acceleration/deceleration units 4x and 4y for axes, compensation unit 5, and servos 6x and 6y for the axes.

[0039] The command analysis unit 2 analyzes blocks of a machining program 10 and generates data used for the movement of the axes. The interpolation unit 3 performs interpolation processing for the data output from the command analysis unit 2, thereby generating interpolation data based on interpolation calculation of points on a command path for each axis.

[0040] The acceleration/deceleration units 4x and 4y for the axes perform acceleration/deceleration processing based on the interpolation data generated by the interpolation unit 3, calculate speeds of the axes for each interpolation period, and output the resulting data to the compensation unit 5.

[0041] The compensation unit 5 performs compensation of the interpolation data using tool information 11, cutter tip information 12, and workpiece shape data 13 according to the procedure described later.

[0042] The servos 6x and 6y for the axes control servomotors for driving the axes of a machine based on the result of the interpolation by the compensation unit 5.

[0043] Configurations of a spindle control unit for rotation control of a spindle and the like are not shown in the drawings.

[0044] The following is a description of procedure of compensation of the tool center path performed by the compensation unit 5.

[0045] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the tool with the cutter tip used for face milling. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the cutter tip of the tool. In the present embodiment, a tool diameter R, the diameter of the tool, and a distance D from the center of the tool to the reference position of the cutter tip are used as the tool information on the tool used for face milling. Further, usable ranges L.sub.0 and L.sub.1 of the cutter tip and a frequency of use in each position within the usable ranges (use frequency in a position Cp.sub.i (i=0 to m) at a distance Cdp.sub.i (i=0 to m) from the reference position of the cutter tip) are used as the cutter tip information of the tool.

[0046] The usable ranges L.sub.0 and L.sub.1 of the cutter tip are set in advance based on the specifications (material, hardness, shape, etc.) of the cutter tip. Further, the use frequency in each position within the usable ranges of the cutter tip is determined by the result of an endurance experiment previously conducted in each position on the cutter tip.

[0047] The tool information and the cutter tip information are input using input means of the numerical controller or the like and loaded into a memory of the numerical controller. Likewise, a machining program for specifying the tool center path and the workpiece shape data are input using the input means of the numerical controller or the like and loaded into the memory of the numerical controller.

[0048] Then, in the face milling based on the machining program, the numerical controller of the present embodiment stored with the above-described information obtains a collision position P.sub.n of the cutter tip and the workpiece corresponding to a tool center G.sub.n, which is the point of intersection of the workpiece shape data and a circle (dotted-line circle in FIG. 5) with the tool diameter R about a tool center G.sub.n-1 obtained from the programmed tool center path according to the machining program and is advanced by a margin corresponding to a depth of cut d per cutter tip blade, as shown in FIG. 5. An angle between an engaging edge of the workpiece and a line connecting the tool center G.sub.n and the collision position P.sub.n of the cutter tip is called an engage angle .

[0049] After the above-described calculation, the numerical controller of the present embodiment calculates parameters for a case in which a tool center position is compensated perpendicularly relative to the tool center path so as to collide with the lower end of the cutter tip (in a position at a distance (D+L.sub.0) from the tool center position) and the workpiece, as shown in FIG. 6A, and a case in which the tool center position is compensated perpendicularly relative to the tool center path so as to collide with the upper end of the cutter tip (in a position at a distance (DL.sub.1) from the tool center position) and the workpiece, as shown in FIG. 6B. Based on the distance D from the tool center to the reference position of the cutter tip, which is included in the tool information, and the usable ranges L.sub.0 and L.sub.1 of the cutter tip, which are included in the cutter tip information, a compensation range is obtained using a distance D.sub.0 (=D+L.sub.0) of the lower end of each usable range of the cutter tip, distance D.sub.1 (=DL.sub.1) of the upper end, engage angle .sub.0 in the lower end position, and engage angle .sub.1 at the upper end, as shown in FIG. 7.

[0050] The numerical controller compensates the tool center position perpendicularly relative to the tool path within the compensation range . When this compensation is performed, the frequencies of use within the usable ranges of the cutter tip and the positions on the cutter tip within the compensation range are associated with one another. Specifically, if use frequencies for positions Cp.sub.0, Cp.sub.1 and Cp.sub.m on the cutter tip are K.sub.0, K.sub.1 and K.sub.m, respectively, the numerical controller generates the tool center path so that the ratio between frequencies of collision in positions Cp.sub.0, Cp.sub.1, . . . Cp.sub.m is K.sub.0:K.sub.1: . . . :K.sub.m. Thus, the tool center path is compensated in the manner shown in FIG. 1.

[0051] Based on the collision frequency ratio (K.sub.0:K.sub.1: . . . :K.sub.m) in the position Cp.sub.i (i=0 to m) on the cutter tip, at this time, the numerical controller determines the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip used for compensation at each compensation point (tool center G.sub.n) shown in FIG. 8. The relationship between the distance Cdp.sub.i of the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip used for compensation at the determined tool center G.sub.n from the reference position of the cutter tip and a distance L.sub.n between the tool center G.sub.n and the collision position of the tool cutter tip and the workpiece can be given as follows:

L.sub.n=D+Cdp.sub.i,(1)

where i is i=0, . . . , n.

[0052] FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing processing performed on the numerical controller according to the present embodiment. It is assumed that the memory of the numerical controller is stored with the tool information, cutter tip information, machining program, and workpiece shape data before this processing is performed. [0053] [Step SA01] The point of intersection of the workpiece and the circle with the tool diameter R about the tool center position G.sub.n-1 is calculated using the data stored in the memory, whereby the collision position P.sub.n of the tool cutter tip and the workpiece is obtained. [0054] [Step SA02] Based on the data stored in the memory, the compensation range is calculated by obtaining the distance D.sub.0 (=D+L.sub.0) of the lower end and the distance D.sub.1 (=DL.sub.1) of the upper end of each usable range of the cutter tip using the distance D from the tool center to the reference position of the cutter tip and the usable ranges L.sub.0 and L.sub.1 of the cutter tip in the cutter tip information. [0055] [Step SA03] A frequency K.sub.i corresponding to the position Cp.sub.i on the compensation range is determined using the frequency K.sub.i corresponding to the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip stored in the memory. [0056] [Step SA04] The position of the tool center G.sub.n covering the entire tool center path is compensated so that each point within the compensation range corresponds to the frequency K.sub.i.

[0057] FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing processing for obtaining the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip used for the compensation of the tool center G.sub.n performed on the numerical controller according to the present embodiment. The position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip used for the compensation of the tool center G.sub.n is determined with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 10. Based on a distance M between the start and end points of the tool center path shown in FIG. 8 and the depth of cut d per cutter tip blade, a total number E of compensation points (G.sub.0 to G.sub.m) on the tool center path is obtained from equation (2) as follows:

E=M/d+1.(2)

[0058] The compensation based on the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip is performed (EK.sub.i) times. An interval INTVAL.sub.i (shown in the flowchart of FIG. 10) for the compensation using the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip on the tool center path is a number (reciprocal of the frequency K.sub.i) obtained by dividing the total number E of compensation points by the frequency (EK.sub.i) of compensation. [0059] [Step SB01] The processes of Steps SB02 to SB10 are repeated for the number of compensation points (tool centers). [0060] [Step SB02] The processes of Steps SB03 to SB09 are repeated for the number of positions on the cutter tip. [0061] [Step SB03] One is added to a counter COUNT.sub.i for determining the interval for the use of the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip, whereupon the counter is updated. [0062] [Step SB04] The interval INTVAL.sub.i for the use of the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip and COUNT.sub.i are compared. If INTVAL.sub.i and COUNT.sub.i are equal, the processing diverges to Step SB05. If INTVAL.sub.i and COUNT.sub.i are not equal, the processing diverges to Step SB09. [0063] [Step SB05] The position Cp.sub.i is stored as a position on the cutter tip used for compensation at a tool center G.sub.j in the form of a table shown in FIG. 11 in the memory (not shown) of the numerical controller 1. [0064] [Step SB06] Zero is set to the counter COUNT.sub.i for determining the interval for the use of the position Cp.sub.i on the cutter tip, whereupon the counter is cleared. [0065] [Step SB07] One is added to a compensation point number loop counter j to update it. [0066] [Step SB08] The compensation point number loop counter j and the total number E of compensation points on the tool center path are compared. If j is less than E, the processing diverges to Step SB09. If j is not less than E, the processing ends. [0067] [Step SB09] One is added to a position number loop counter i to update it. If i is less than a total number (m+1) of the positions on the cutter tip, the processing diverges to Step SB02. If i is not less than (m+1), the processing diverges to Step SB10. [0068] [Step SB10] One is added to the compensation point number loop counter j to update it. If j is less than the total number E of compensation points on the tool center path, the processing diverges to Step SB01. If j is not less than E, the processing ends.

[0069] In the case of the present embodiment, the engage angles .sub.0 and .sub.1 shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B are used as engage angle tolerances in place of the usable ranges L.sub.0 and L.sub.1 of the cutter tip and the use frequency in each position within the usable ranges.

[0070] FIG. 12 is a schematic configuration diagram of a numerical controller according to the embodiment. A numerical controller 1 of the present embodiment differs from the foregoing embodiment in that engage information 14 including information on tolerances of engage angles and use frequencies at the engage angles is stored in place of the cutter tip information 12.

[0071] The tolerances of the engage angles are input using input means (not shown) or the like of the numerical controller 1 and stored in a memory (not shown) of the numerical controller 1. As this is done, moreover, the use frequencies at the engage angles within the tolerances of the engage angles are also accepted through the input means (not shown) or the like of the numerical controller 1 and stored in the memory (not shown) of the numerical controller 1. The use frequency at each engage angle within the usable ranges thereof is determined in advance by the result of an endurance experiment previously conducted for each engage angle of the cutter tip.

[0072] The numerical controller 1 obtains a compensation range based on the engage angles .sub.0 and .sub.1 and the distance between the tool center G.sub.n and the collision position P.sub.n. The numerical controller 1 compensates the tool center path within the compensation range . When this compensation is performed, the tolerances of the engage angles and the use frequencies for positions on the cutter tip preset depending on the properties of the cutter tip are associated with one another. Specifically, if use frequencies for engage angles p.sub.0, p.sub.1 and p.sub.m are K.sub.0, K.sub.1 and K.sub.m, respectively, the numerical controller 1 generates the tool center path so that the ratio between frequencies of collision at engage angles p.sub.0, p.sub.1, . . . p.sub.m is K.sub.0:K.sub.1: . . . :K.sub.m. If the distance between the tool center and the collision position of the cutter tip is then L.sub.n, the nth collision position of the workpiece and the tool cutter tip is an intersection point position P.sub.n-1(Px.sub.n-1, Py.sub.n-1) between the distance L.sub.n from the tool center, contour S of the shape of the workpiece, and tool diameter D as the tool center position is moved by a feed amount d from O.sub.n-1 to O.sub.n, as shown in FIG. 13.

[0073] At this time, a compensation position O.sub.n(Ox.sub.n, Oy.sub.n) of the tool center can be obtained according to equation (3) as follows:

Ox.sub.n=Ox.sub.n,

Oy.sub.n=L.sub.n.sup.2Px.sub.n-1Ox.sub.n).sup.2.(3)

[0074] In this way, the compensation unit 5 of the numerical controller 1 of the present embodiment performs compensation of the tool center path based on the engage information 14. Other operations are performed in the same manner as in the foregoing embodiment.

[0075] The present embodiment provides a method for further compensating the tool center path generated in the numerical controller 1.

[0076] In face milling, a large force may sometimes be produced due to unevenness of the workpiece as the tool cutter tip collides with the workpiece. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating engage angles and the thickness of chips of the workpiece produced when the tool cutter tip collides with the workpiece. A cutter tip L that collides with the workpiece at an engage angle .sub.L is impacted less than a cutter tip S that collides with the workpiece at an engage angle .sub.S is, due to the smaller thickness of chips produced at the time of the collision.

[0077] FIG. 15 shows the change of a peak value of a spindle load current due to unevenness of the workpiece. In the present embodiment, the tool center path is compensated so that the peak value of the spindle load current after the compensation is within a pre-specified tolerance of the value of the spindle load current.

[0078] According to the present embodiment, such a method is disclosed that the spindle load current value is monitored as the tool cutter tip collides with the workpiece. If the spindle load current value exceeds the pre-specified tolerance of the spindle load current, the tool center path is compensated so that the engage angle increases. Thus, the occurrence of chipping of the tool cutter tip can be suppressed by confining the force with which the tool cutter tip collides with the workpiece within the pre-specified tolerance of the spindle load current.

[0079] The numerical controller 1 of the present embodiment is designed so that a tolerance of the spindle load current can be set by its input means (not shown) or the like. Also, the numerical controller 1 is designed so that a batch compensation width for the compensation of the tool center path can be set by its input means (not shown) or the like. The set tolerance of the spindle load current and the batch compensation width for the compensation of the tool center path are loaded into the memory of the numerical controller (FIG. 16).

[0080] When the face milling based on the machining program is started, the numerical controller 1 of the present embodiment monitors the spindle load current value and acquires the peak value of the spindle load current that appears periodically. Also, an average of the peak value of the spindle load current within a pre-specified period is calculated. Then, the calculated average is compared with the tolerance of the spindle load current. If the average exceeds the tolerance , the tool center path is compensated for the batch compensation width . If an engage angle .sub.n as a result of the compensation exceeds the engage angle .sub.1 described in connection with the foregoing embodiment, however, the compensation is clamped at the engage angle .sub.1. If the calculated average is within the tolerance , in contrast, the compensation is canceled. The numerical controller 1 periodically repeats this compensation processing during actual machining.

[0081] FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing processing performed on the numerical controller 1 according to the present embodiment. It is assumed that the memory (not shown) of the numerical controller is stored with the tolerance of the spindle load current and the batch compensation width for the compensation of the tool center path. [0082] [Step SC01] It is determined whether or not the actual machining is in progress. If the actual machining is in progress, the processing proceeds to Step SCO2. If not, this processing ends. [0083] [Step SC02] The spindle load current value is acquired from an ammeter or the like attached to a power supply line for the spindle. [0084] [Step SC03] It is determined whether or not the peak value of the spindle load current is acquired. If the peak value is acquired, the processing proceeds to Step SC04. If not, the processing returns to Step SC01. [0085] [Step SC04] The average of the peak value of the spindle load current is calculated based on the peak value of the spindle load current acquired within the pre-specified period. [0086] [Step SC05] It is determined whether or not the average of the peak value of the spindle load current is larger than the tolerance . If the average of the peak value of the spindle load current is larger than the tolerance , the processing proceeds to Step SC06. If not, the processing proceeds to Step SC10. [0087] [Step SC06] The tool center path is compensated using the batch compensation width for the compensation of the tool center path. [0088] [Step SC07] The engage angle .sub.n in the position of the tool center G.sub.n on the compensated tool center path is calculated. [0089] [Step SC08] It is determined whether or not the engage angle .sub.n is larger than the engage angle .sub.1 at which the upper end of each usable range of the cutter tip collides with the workpiece. If the engage angle .sub.n is larger than the engage angle .sub.1, the processing proceeds to Step SC09. If not, the processing returns to Step SC01. [0090] [Step SC09] The tool center path is compensated so that the engage angle is .sub.1, whereupon the processing returns to Step SC01. [0091] [Step SC10] It is determined whether or not the compensation is in progress. If the compensation is in progress, the processing proceeds to Step SC11. If not, the processing returns to Step SC01. [0092] [Step SC11] The compensation in progress is canceled, whereupon the processing returns to Step SC01.

[0093] While embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, the invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments and may be suitably modified and embodied in various forms.