Method of peening lap fillet welded joint and welded structures

11633811 · 2023-04-25

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A peening method which can sufficiently improve fatigue properties of a lap fillet welded joint having a thin steel sheet as a base sheet, in which a knocking pin having a predetermined shape is continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction, the series of knocking is repeatedly performed in the welding direction, at that time, a knocking mark group made of a plurality of knocking marks formed by the series of knocking is superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group while an end part in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark group is separated from an end part in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the adjacent knocking mark group.

Claims

1. A method of peening a lap fillet welded joint, comprising knocking a weld toe of the lap fillet welded joint using a knocking pin attached to a tip of a knocking tool, wherein the knocking pin has, on its tip, a curvature radius in a vertical cross section in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of the weld toe, the knocking pin is continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction across the weld toe, the series of knocking is repeatedly performed in the welding direction, and at that time, a knocking mark group made of a plurality of knocking marks formed by the series of knocking is partially superimposed on an adjacent knocking mark group, while, except for the superimposed part, an end part in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark group is separated from an end part in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the adjacent knocking mark group.

2. The method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to claim 1, wherein the series of knocking is performed at an inclination angle relative to the welding direction of 30° to 45°.

3. The peening method according to claim 2, wherein the knocking tool is clamped with a viscoelastic material on a holder of the knocking tool.

4. The peening method according to claim 1, wherein the knocking tool is clamped with a viscoelastic material on a holder of the knocking tool.

5. A welded structure having a lap fillet welded joint, comprising a plurality of knocking mark groups in which a plurality knocking marks run at an angle relative to a welding direction across a weld toe of the lap fillet welded joint, wherein the knocking marks have a curvature radius in a cross section perpendicular to the weld line direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm, and each knocking mark group is partially superimposed on an adjacent knocking mark group while, except for the superimposed part, an end part in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of the knocking mark group is separated from an end part in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the adjacent knocking mark group.

6. The welded structure according to claim 5, wherein each knocking mark group has the knocking marks running at a slanting angle of 30° to 45° with respect to the welding direction.

7. The welded structure according to claim 6, wherein the lap fillet welded joint has a base sheet with a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more.

8. The welded structure according to claim 5, wherein the lap fillet welded joint has a base sheet with a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more.

9. A method of peening a lap fillet welded joint, comprising knocking a weld toe of the lap fillet welded joint using a knocking pin attached to a tip of a knocking tool, wherein the knocking pin has, on its tip, a curvature radius in a vertical cross section in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of the weld toe, the knocking pin is knocked while the knocking pin is oscillated in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction across the weld toe and moved in the welding direction, the knocking pin has an oscillation width around the weld toe at least twice a width of a knocking mark per knock point, and in a knocking region determined according to the oscillation width of the knocking pin, end parts in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of knocking marks, which are located at a widthwise edge of the knocking region and partially superimposed on each other, are separated from each other in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or, knocking marks located at the widthwise edge of the knocking region are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

10. The peening method according to claim 9, wherein the knocking tool is clamped with a viscoelastic material on a holder of the knocking tool.

11. A welded structure having a lap fillet welded joint, comprising a knocking region having a plurality of knocking marks running across a weld toe of the lap fillet welded joint, wherein in the knocking region, the knocking marks have a curvature radius in a cross section perpendicular to the weld line direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm, the knocking marks have a total length on the weld toe of 50% or more of the whole length of the weld toe, and the knocking region has a width at least twice a width of a knocking mark per knock point, and further, in the knocking region, end parts in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of knocking marks, which are located at an widthwise edge of the knocking region and partially superimposed on each other, are separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or, knocking marks located at the widthwise edge of the knocking region are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

12. The welded structure according to claim 11, wherein the lap fillet welded joint has a base sheet with a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) In the accompanying drawings:

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating one typical example of peening;

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating one example of a fold mark formed during peening;

(4) FIG. 3 is a micro-image illustrating one example of a weld toe of a lap fillet welded joint;

(5) FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a knocking mark formed by a conventional peening method and a stress loading direction of a representative fatigue fracture mode;

(6) FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating a knocking mark (knocking mark group) formed by a peening method according to one of the disclosed embodiments and a stress loading direction of a representative fatigue fracture mode;

(7) FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating a knocking mark (knocking region) formed by a peening method according to another embodiment and a stress loading direction of a representative fatigue fracture mode;

(8) FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a shape of a test piece;

(9) FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating a holding manner of a knocking tool in a knocking tool holder; and

(10) FIG. 9 is a sectional view taken along line A-A of FIG. 8.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(11) The present disclosure is described in detail below based on embodiments.

First Embodiment

(12) A method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to a first embodiment, comprises knocking a weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint using a knocking pin 5 attached to a tip of a knocking tool, wherein the knocking pin 5 has, on its tip, a curvature radius in a vertical cross section in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of the weld toe 4, the knocking pin 5 is continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction across the weld toe 4, the series of knocking is repeatedly performed in the welding direction, and at that time, a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking is superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark group 12 is separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction.

(13) The method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to the first embodiment is described below.

(14) A curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 being 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of the weld toe 4

(15) As stated above, when weld ripples 9 formed on the weld toe 4 during welding are collapsed to be flattened, stress concentration is relaxed even if the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 is decreased, and a fold mark 7 at the weld toe can be effectively prevented from occurring. Therefore, the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 is set to 0.50 mm or less and equal to or less than the curvature radius of the weld toe 4 of the welded joint before peening. Further, from the viewpoint of effectively collapsing the weld ripples 9, the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 needs to be set to 0.05 mm or more.

(16) For example, in the case of a lap fillet welded joint having a thin steel sheet with a thickness of 3.6 mm or less as a base sheet, the curvature radius of the weld toe 4 is typically about 0.50 mm to 1.0 mm, and thus the knocking pin tip 6 having a curvature radius of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm is used.

(17) Further, in the method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to the first embodiment, it is important that the knocking pin 5 is continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction across the weld toe 4, the series of knocking is repeatedly performed in the welding direction, and at that time, a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking is superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark group 12 is separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction.

(18) As used herein, the knocking mark group 12 refers to a series of knocking marks 10 running at a predetermined inclination angle relative to the welding direction as illustrated in FIG. 5.

(19) Further, the end part 121 of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction refers to a region ranging from the end of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction to 1% of the width of the knocking mark group 12.

(20) Specifically, as stated above, a fold mark 8 at a knocking mark edge illustrated in FIG. 2 may provide the origin of fatigue fracture. In particular, as illustrated in FIG. 4, when the lap fillet welded joint is continuously knocked along the weld toe 4 in the welding direction, fold marks 8 at knocking mark edges are continuously connected in a direction orthogonal to a stress loading direction, that is, the welding direction, and as a result, the stress intensity factor is increased to promote development of a crack, deteriorating fatigue properties. To prevent the deterioration of fatigue properties, it is effective to prevent fold marks 8 at knocking mark edges from being continuously connected in the welding direction.

(21) Therefore, in the method of peening the first embodiment, the knocking pin 5 is continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction across the weld toe 4 (in other words, knocking is performed so that the knocking marks 10 are superimposed with each other and have a center line inclined relative to the welding direction) and the series of knocking is repeatedly performed in the welding direction. At that time, knocking mark groups 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 as illustrated in FIG. 5 are formed by superimposing a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while separating an end part 121 of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction.

(22) When the series of knocking is performed, it is preferable to set an inclination angle relative to the welding direction θ (hereinafter, also referred to as “scanning angle”) to 30° to 45°.

(23) When the scanning angle is set to 30° or more, since the fold mark 8 at the knocking mark edge can be particularly advantageously prevented from being continuously connected in the welding direction, the effect of improving fatigue properties is increased. On the other hand, a scanning angle of more than 45° leads to deterioration in workability.

(24) Further, no limitation is placed on the scanning distance of the series of knocking in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction (hereinafter, also referred to as “scanning width”) as long as the knocking mark group 12 is formed across the weld toe 4, yet the scanning width is preferably set to 1.0 mm or more. The upper limit of the scanning width is not particularly limited, yet it is preferably set to about 3.0 mm from the viewpoint of work efficiency.

(25) Further, the series of knocking is preferably applied to a region up to at least about 0.5 mm on each of the weld metal side and the base sheet side around the weld toe 4 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, and particularly preferably applied around the weld toe 4.

(26) Further, the distance between the centers of knocking mark groups 12 adjacent to each other on the weld toe 4 is preferably 0.70 to 0.99 times the length of a knocking mark 10 formed per knock in the welding direction. Therefore, a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking can be superimposed more advantageously on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction can be separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction.

(27) Further, other than the above peening conditions are not particularly limited, yet it is sufficient to follow the conventional methods. For example, in the series of knocking, the knocking frequency may be 50 Hz to 300 Hz and the scanning rate may be 3 mm/s to 30 mm/s. Moreover, the knocking angle of the knocking pin 5 (an angle formed on a plane perpendicular to the welding direction by the centerline of the knocking pin 5 and a straight line perpendicular to the base sheet (thin steel sheet) surface of the weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint) may be preferably 30° to 60°.

(28) As stated above, by knocking the weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint, a welded structure having the lap fillet welded joint according to the first embodiment as illustrated in FIG. 5 can be obtained, the welded structure comprising a plurality of knocking mark groups 12 in which a plurality of knocking marks 10 run at an angle relative to the welding direction across the weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint, wherein the knocking marks 10 have a curvature radius in a cross section perpendicular to the weld line direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm, and each knocking mark group 12 is superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of the knocking mark group 12 is separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in the direction orthogonal to the welding direction.

(29) Note that θ, which denotes the inclination angle relative to the welding direction of the knocking mark group 12 (i.e., the angle formed by the running direction of the knocking marks 10 of the knocking mark group 12 and the welding direction), is the same as the scanning angle, and L1, which denotes the width of the knocking mark group 12 (width in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction), is the same as the scanning width. θ is preferably in a range of 30° to 45° and L1 is preferably in a range of 1.0 mm to 3.0 mm.

Second Embodiment

(30) The method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to a second embodiment, comprising knocking a weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint using a knocking pin 5 attached to a tip of a knocking tool, wherein the knocking pin 5 has, on its tip, a curvature radius in a vertical cross section in a direction orthogonal to a welding direction of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of the weld toe 4, the knocking pin 5 is knocked while the knocking pin 5 is oscillated in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction across the weld toe 4 and moved in the welding direction, the knocking pin 5 has an oscillation width around the weld toe at least twice a width of the knocking mark 10 per knock point, and in a knocking region 13 defined according to the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5, end parts 101 of knocking marks 10 that are located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other, are separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(31) The method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to the second embodiment is described below.

(32) A curvature radius of a knocking pin tip 6 being 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm and equal to or less than a curvature radius of a weld toe 4

(33) As stated above, when weld ripples 9 formed at the weld toe 4 during welding are collapsed to be flattened, stress concentration is relaxed even if the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 is decreased and a fold mark 7 at the weld toe can be effectively prevented from occurring. Therefore, the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 is set to 0.50 mm or less and equal to or less than the curvature radius of the weld toe 4 of the welded joint before peening. Further, from the viewpoint of effectively collapsing the weld ripples 9, the curvature radius of the knocking pin tip 6 needs to be set to 0.05 mm or more.

(34) For example, in the case of a lap fillet welded joint having a thin steel sheet with a thickness of 3.6 mm or less as a base sheet, the curvature radius of the weld toe 4 is typically about 0.50 mm to 1.0 mm, and thus the knocking pin tip 6 having a curvature radius of 0.05 mm to 0.50 mm is used.

(35) Further, in the method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to the second embodiment, the knocking pin 5 is knocked while the knocking pin 5 is oscillated in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction across the weld toe 4 and moved in the welding direction. At that time, the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5 is set to be at least twice the width of the knocking mark 10 per knock point, that is, the width (in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction) of one knocking mark.

(36) Specifically, as stated above, the fold mark 8 at the knocking mark edge illustrated in FIG. 2 may provide the origin of fatigue fracture. In particular, as illustrated in FIG. 4, when the lap fillet welded joint is continuously knocked along the weld toe 4, the fold mark 8 at the knocking mark edge are continuously connected in a direction orthogonal to a stress loading direction, that is, the welding direction, and as a result, the stress intensity factor is increased to promote development of a crack, deteriorating fatigue properties.

(37) Therefore, in the method of peening a lap fillet welded joint according to the second embodiment, the knocking pin 5 is knocked while the knocking pin 5 is oscillated in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction across the weld toe 4 (in other words, the knocking pin 5 is oscillated so that the knocking pin 5 crosses the weld toe 4 at least a predetermined number of times and the knocking marks 10 formed by the knocking are superimposed on one another) and moved in the welding direction. At that time, as illustrated in FIG. 6, by setting the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5 (in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction) to be at least twice, and preferably 2.5 times or more of a width of one knocking mark 10, L0, the knocking region 13 having a plurality of knocking marks 10 is formed and end parts 101 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of knocking marks that are 10 located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other, are separated from each other, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(38) As used herein, the end part 101 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark 10 refers to a region ranging from the end in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of the knocking mark 10 on an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 to 1% of the width of the knocking mark 10.

(39) Therefore, it becomes possible to prevent the fold mark 8 at the knocking mark edge from continuously running in the welding direction to improve fatigue properties.

(40) The upper limit of the oscillation width is not particularly limited, but it is preferably set to 3.0 mm from the viewpoint of work efficiency.

(41) Further, the oscillation range preferably includes a region at least including the weld toe 4 in the center and extending by about 0.5 mm to both the weld metal side and the base sheet side in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, and particularly preferably includes the weld toe 4 in the center.

(42) Moreover, preferably, the knocking frequency is set to 50 Hz to 300 Hz, the oscillation frequency is set to 1 Hz to 20 Hz, and the scanning rate is set to 0.1 mm/s to 20 mm/s.

(43) Other than the above peening conditions are not particularly limited, yet it is sufficient to follow the conventional methods.

(44) As stated above, by knocking a weld toe 4 of a lap fillet welded joint, a welded structure having the lap fillet welded joint according to the second embodiment can be obtained, the welded structure comprising a knocking region 13 having a plurality of knocking marks 10 running across the weld toe 4 of the lap fillet welded joint, wherein in the knocking region 13, the knocking marks 10 have a total length on the weld toe 4 of 50% or more of the whole length of the weld toe 4, and the knocking region 13 has a width at least twice a width of a knocking mark 10 per knock point, and further, in the knocking region 13, end parts 101 of knocking marks 10 that are located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other, are separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(45) The knocking region 13 is defined as a region having a maximum width (maximum width in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction), L2, the region including a plurality of contiguous (or mutually superimposed) knocking marks 10 as illustrated in FIG. 6.

(46) However, from the viewpoint of sufficiently obtaining a stress relieving effect by peening, it is necessary to make the total length on the weld toe 4 of the knocking marks 10 in the knocking region 13 50% or more of the whole length of the weld toe 4. The total length on the weld toe 4 of the knocking marks 10 is preferably 70% or more and more preferably 90% or more of the whole length of the weld toe 4. Alternatively, it may be 100%.

(47) Adjusting the knocking frequency, oscillation frequency, and scanning rate in the welding direction to the above ranges makes it possible that in the knocking region, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the knocking marks 10 have a total length on the weld toe 4 of 50% or more of the whole length of the weld toe 4 and in the knocking region 13, end parts 101 of knocking marks 10 that are located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other, are separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 are contacted with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(48) Further, in particular, adjusting the knocking frequency to 50 Hz to 150 Hz, oscillation frequency to 1 Hz to 10 Hz, and scanning rate in the welding direction to 0.1 mm/s to 5 mm/s makes it possible that in the knocking region, the knocking marks have a total length on the weld toe of 90% or more of the whole length of the weld toe.

(49) Moreover, from the viewpoint of improving fatigue properties, it is preferable that the straight line connecting the centers of knocking marks 10 superimposed on each other is not parallel to the welding direction. Therefore, it is preferable that the knocking frequency f.sub.1 is inconsistent with the oscillation frequency f.sub.2, specifically, f.sub.1/f.sub.2 is a non-integer.

(50) The width of the knocking region 13, L2 is typically almost the same as the oscillation width. Therefore, the knocking region 13 has a width at least twice a width of one knocking mark. The knocking region 13 preferably has a width of 2.5 times or more of a width of one knocking mark. The width of the knocking region 13, L2 is preferably 3.0 mm or less, and more preferably 1.0 mm or less.

(51) While the first and second embodiments have been described above, it is particularly preferable to apply the peening according to these embodiments to a lap fillet welded joint having a thin steel sheet with a thickness of 1.0 mm to 3.6 mm (more preferably, 2.0 mm to 3.0 mm) and a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more as a base sheet.

(52) Further, the knocking pin 5 has any tip shape if the curvature radius of the tip is equal to or less than the curvature radius of the weld toe 4. For example, the knocking pin 5 may have a tip with a semicylindrical, hemispherical, semielliptical, or approximately semicylindrical shape.

(53) Moreover, when the peening is performed according to the embodiments stated above, not only an air-driven device and ultrasonic device but also an electric device can be also used, and thus, it is very advantageous in terms of workability.

(54) In addition, the welding method is not particularly limited, and the peening method can be applied to any welded joint obtained by, for example, arc welding and laser welding.

(55) Further, although the holding method of the knocking tool 17 is not particularly specified, when the knocking tool 17 is pressed against the weld toe 4 using the knocking tool holder 18 as illustrated in FIG. 8, it is desirable from the reason stated above to clamp the knocking tool 17 with the viscoelastic material 20 as illustrated in FIG. 9. In FIG. 9, reference sign 19 indicates a bolt.

(56) The material property of the viscoelastic material 20 is not particularly limited if it has viscosity which makes the vibration of the knocking tool holder 18 inconsistent with that of the knocking pin 5. However, a polymer substance such as rubber and gel is preferable.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

(57) An example according to the first embodiment will be described.

(58) Steel sheets with a size of 300 mm×70 mm (thickness: 2.9 mm) were cut out of various steel materials. Two steel sheets thus cut out were fixed with a jig and subjected to lap fillet arc welding under the conditions listed in Table 1 to produce various lap fillet arc welded joints. Next, a weld toe 4 of each produced lap fillet arc welded joint was subjected to peening using an electric or air-driven (air pressure of 0.5 MPa) device under the conditions listed in Tables 2 and 4 to 6 to form knocking marks 10 on the lap fillet arc welded joint as illustrated in FIG. 5.

(59) The peening was performed until a slag of the surface of the weld toe 4 was fractured and the internal metallic luster was exposed. Further, the knocking pin 5 was continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to the welding direction across the weld toe 4, the series of knocking was repeatedly performed in the welding direction, and at that time, a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking was superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction was separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction. Further, the used knocking pin 5 had a tip with a hemispherical shape. The scanning rate in the series of knocking was 10 mm/s.

(60) The curvature radius of the weld toe 4 as listed in Tables 4 to 6 was determined by averaging the measurement results at five locations for each welded joint according to NPL 2.

(61) Test pieces having a shape illustrated in FIG. 7 were collected from the lap fillet arc welded joints after the peening so that a weld bead 11 became the center part of the test piece. Using the test pieces, plane bending fatigue test was conducted in accordance with JIS Z 2275 under the conditions listed in Table 3 to evaluate fatigue properties based on the following criterion.

(62) Passed (Particularly Excellent): Fatigue life was beyond three million times (if the test piece was not fractured at a stress repeating count of three million, fatigue life was judged as beyond three million times).

(63) Passed (Excellent): Fatigue life was two million times or more and three million times or less.

(64) Failed: Fatigue life was less than two million times.

(65) The evaluation results are also listed in Tables 4 to 6.

(66) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Current Voltage Welding rate Shielding gas (A) (V) (cm/min) 80 vol. % Ar—20 vol. % CO.sub.2 230 23 80

(67) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Knocking pin Knocking diameter frequency Device (mm) (Hz) Electric type 3 100 Air-driven type 3 20

(68) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Nominal stress range Frequency Counts when (MPa) Stress ratio (Hz) test ends 500 0 10 3 million times

(69) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature Curvature streangth of radius of radius of weld steel sheet knocking toe before Scanning Scanning (base sheet) pin peening angle width No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (°) (mm) 1 980 0.04 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 2 980 0.05 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 3 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 4 980 0.40 0.50 air-driven type 30 1.0 5 980 0.50 0.50 air-driven type 30 1.0 6 980 0.51 0.50 air-driven type 30 1.0 Shape of weld toe after peening Inclination angle relative to Width of Curvature welding direction knocking Presence/ radius of of knocking mark absence knocking mark group group of fold mark θ L1 mark in Fatigue life No. (mm) (°) (mm) weld toe (times) Remarks 1 0.04 30 1.0 absent 1.5 mill. Comparative Example 2 0.05 30 1.0 absent 2.5 mill. Example 3 0.10 30 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 4 0.40 30 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 5 0.50 30 1.0 absent 2.5 mill. Example 6 0.51 30 1.0 present 0.31 mill.  Comparative Example

(70) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature Curvature streangth of radius of radius of weld steel sheet knocking toe before Scanning Scanning (base sheet) pin peening angle width No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (°) (mm) 7 980 0.10 0.50 electric type  0 1.0 8 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 20 1.0 9 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 10 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 45 1.0 11 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 50 1.0 Shape of weld toe after peening Inclination angle relative to Width of Curvature welding direction knocking Presence/ radius of of knocking mark absence knocking mark group group of fold mark θ L1 mark in Fatigue life No. (mm) (°) (mm) weld toe (times) Remarks 7 0.10  0 1.0 absent   1 mill. Comparative Example 8 0.10 20 1.0 absent 2.5 mill. Example 9 0.10 30 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 10 0.10 45 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 11 0.10 50 1.0 absent 2.5 mill. Example

(71) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature Curvature streangth of radius of radius of weld steel sheet knocking toe before Scanning Scanning (base sheet) pin peening angle width No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (°) (mm) 12 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 13 780 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 14 690 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 15 590 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 16 440 0.10 0.50 electric type 30 1.0 Shape of weld toe after peening Inclination angle relative to Width of Curvature welding direction knocking Presence/ radius of of knocking mark absence knocking mark group group of fold mark θ L1 mark in Fatigue life No. (mm) (°) (mm) weld toe (times) Remarks 12 0.10 30 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 13 0.10 30 1.0 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 14 0.10 30 1.0 absent 2.6 mill. Example 15 0.10 30 1.0 absent 2.3 mill. Example 16 0.10 30 1.0 absent   2 mill. Example

(72) As listed in Tables 4 to 6, our examples had excellent fatigue life.

(73) Further, as listed in Table 5, when an inclination angle relative to the welding direction is controlled to be 30° to 45°, excellent fatigue life was obtained.

(74) Moreover, as listed in Table 6, when a steel sheet having a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more was used as a base sheet, fatigue properties could be advantageously improved.

Example 2

(75) An example according to the second embodiment stated above will be described.

(76) Steel sheets with a size of 300 mm×70 mm (thickness: 2.9 mm) were cut out of various steel materials. Two steel sheets thus cut out were fixed with a jig and subjected to lap fillet arc welding under the conditions listed in Table 1 to produce various lap fillet art welded joints. Next, a weld toe 4 of each produced lap fillet arc welded joint was subjected to peening using an electric or air-driven (air pressure of 0.5 MPa) device under the conditions listed in Tables 2 and 7 to 9 while the knocking pin 5 was oscillated in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction around the weld toe 4. The peening was performed until a slag of the surface of the weld toe 4 was fractured and the internal metallic luster was exposed. Further, the used knocking pin 5 had a tip with a hemispherical shape.

(77) The curvature radiuses of the weld toes 4 listed in Tables 7 to 9 were determined by averaging the measurement results at five locations for each welded joint according to NPL 2.

(78) In any example in which the knocking pin 5 was oscillated, in a knocking region 13 determined according to the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5, knocking marks 10 located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other had end parts 101 separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 were contacting with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(79) Test pieces having a shape illustrated in FIG. 7 were collected from the lap fillet arc welded joints after the peening so that a weld bead 11 became the center part of the test piece. Using the test pieces, plane bending fatigue test was conducted in accordance with JIS Z 2275 under the conditions listed in Table 3 to evaluate fatigue properties based on the following criterion.

(80) Passed (Particularly Excellent): Fatigue life was beyond three million times (if the test piece was not fractured at a stress repeating count of three million, fatigue life was judged as beyond three million times).

(81) Passed (Excellent): Fatigue life was two million times or more and three million times or less.

(82) Failed: Fatigue life was less than two million times.

(83) The evaluation results are also listed in Tables 7 to 9.

(84) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature streangth of Curvature radius of weld steel sheet radius of toe before Oscillation Oscillation Scanning (base sheet) knocking pin peening width frequency rate No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (mm) (Hz) (mm/s) 101 980 0.04 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 1 102 980 0.05 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 1 103 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 1 104 980 0.40 0.50 air-driven type 0.6 7 1 105 980 0.50 0.50 air-driven type 0.6 7 1 106 980 0.51 0.50 air-driven type 0.6 7 1 Shape of weld toe after peening Ratio of total length of Curvature Width of Width of knocking marks radius of one knocking knocking on weld toe to Presence/ knocking mark region whole length of absence mark L0 L2 weld toe of fold mark Fatigue life No. (mm) (mm) (mm) (%) in weld toe (times) Remarks 101 0.04 0.2 0.6 90 absent  1.5 mill. Comparative Example 102 0.05 0.2 0.6 90 absent  2.5 mill. Example 103 0.10 0.2 0.6 90 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 104 0.40 0.2 0.6 70 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 105 0.50 0.2 0.6 70 absent  2.5 mill. Example 106 0.51 0.2 0.6 70 present 0.31 mill. Comparative Example

(85) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature streangth of Curvature radius of weld steel sheet radius of toe before Oscillation Oscillation Scanning (base sheet) knocking pin peening width frequency rate No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (mm) (Hz) (mm/s) 107 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 108 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.5 7 7 109 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.4 7 7 110 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 4 4 111 980 0.10 0.50 electric type no oscillation Shape of weld toe after peening Ratio of total length of Curvature Width of Width of knocking marks radius of one knocking knocking on weld toe to Presence/ knocking mark region whole length of absence mark L0 L2 weld toe of fold mark Fatigue life No. (mm) (mm) (mm) (%) in weld toe (times) Remarks 107 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 108 0.10 0.2 0.5 70 absent beyond 3 mill. Example 109 0.10 0.2 0.4 70 absent 2 mill. Example 110 0.10 0.2 0.6 90 absent 2 mill. Example 111 0.10 0.2 0.2 100 absent 1 mill. Comparative Example

(86) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Peening conditions Tensile Curvature Curvature streangth of radius of radius of weld steel sheet knocking toe before Oscillation Oscillation Scanning (base sheet) pin peening width frequency rate No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) Device (mm) (Hz) (mm/s) 112 980 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 113 780 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 114 690 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 115 590 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 116 440 0.10 0.50 electric type 0.6 7 7 Shape of weld toe after peening Ratio of total length of Curvature Width of Width of knocking marks Presence/ radius of one knocking knocking on weld toe to absence knocking mark region whole length of of fold Fatigue mark L0 L2 weld toe mark in life No. (mm) (mm) (mm) (%) weld toe (times) Remarks 112 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent beyond Example 3 mill. 113 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent beyond Example 3 mill. 114 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent 2.6 mill. Example 115 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent 2.3 mill. Example 116 0.10 0.2 0.6 70 absent   2 mill. Example

(87) As listed in Tables 7 to 9, our examples had excellent fatigue life.

(88) Further, as listed in Table 8, when the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5 was 2.5 times or more of the width of one knocking mark, particularly excellent fatigue life was obtained.

(89) Moreover, as listed in Table 9, when a steel sheet having a tensile strength of 780 MPa or more was used as a base sheet, fatigue properties could be advantageously improved.

Example 3

(90) To demonstrate an effect when a knocking tool was clamped with a viscoelastic material in fixing the knocking tool with a holding jig, the peening was performed with the method according to the first embodiment while the knocking tool was held in such a way as illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9. The method is described below.

(91) Steel sheets (thickness of 2.9 mm) were subjected to lap fillet arc welding under the conditions listed in Table 1 to produce various lap fillet arc welded joints. Next, a weld toe 4 of each produced lap fillet arc welded joint was subjected to peening using an air-driven (air pressure of 0.5 MPa) device under the conditions listed in Tables 2 and 11 to form knocking marks 5 on the lap fillet arc welded joint as illustrated in FIG. 5.

(92) A knocking tool 17 was clamped with a viscoelastic material 20 as illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9 by inserting the viscoelastic material 20 between the knocking tool 17 which had a mechanism of oscillating a knocking pin 5 and a knocking tool holder 18, and fastening a bolt 19. In the example, a gel sheet made of silicon was used as the viscoelastic material 20.

(93) The peening was performed until a slag of the surface of the weld toe 4 was fractured and the internal metallic luster was exposed. Further, the knocking pin 5 was continuously knocked as a series of knocking toward a direction inclined relative to a welding direction across the weld toe 4, and the series of knocking was repeatedly performed in the welding direction. At that time, a knocking mark group 12 made of a plurality of knocking marks 10 formed by the series of knocking was superimposed on at least a part of an adjacent knocking mark group 12 while an end part 121 of the knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction was separated from an end part 121 of the adjacent knocking mark group 12 in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction. Further, the used knocking pin 5 had a tip with a hemispherical shape. The scanning rate in the series of knocking was 5 mm/s.

(94) The curvature radiuses of the weld toes 4 listed in Table 11 were determined by averaging the measurement results at five locations for each welded joint according to NPL 3.

(95) Test pieces having a shape illustrated in FIG. 7 were collected from the lap fillet arc welded joints after the peening so that a weld bead 11 became the center part of the test piece. Using the test pieces, plane bending fatigue test was conducted in accordance with JIS Z 2275 under the conditions listed in Table 10 to evaluate fatigue properties based on the following criterion.

(96) Passed (Particularly Excellent): Fatigue life was beyond three million times (if the test piece was not fractured at a stress repeating count of three million, fatigue life was judged as beyond three million times).

(97) Passed (Excellent): Fatigue life was two million times or more and three million times or less.

(98) Failed: Fatigue life was less than two million times.

(99) The evaluation results are also listed in Table 11.

(100) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Nominal stress range Frequency Counts when test (MPa) Stress ratio (Hz) ends 600 0 10 3 mill.

(101) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Peening conditions Curvature Curvature radius of Tensile radius of weld toe before Knocking streangth of knocking pin peening angle Scanning Scanning base sheet ρ.sub.p ρ.sub.a β angle width No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) (°) (°) (mm) 2 980 0.5 1.8 0 30 5 114 980 0.5 1.8 0 30 5 Peening Shape of weld toe after peening conditions Inclination angle Presence/ Curvature relative to Width of absence of radius of welding direction knocking viscoelastic knocking of knocking mark group material of mark mark group L1 Fatigue life No. holder (mm) (°) (mm) (times) Remarks 2 absent 1.5 30 5 2.1 mill. Example 114 present 1.5 30 5 beyond 3 mill. Example

(102) As listed in Table 11, particularly excellent fatigue life was obtained when the knocking tool was clamped with the viscoelastic material.

Example 4

(103) As with Example 3, to demonstrate an effect when a knocking tool was clamped with a viscoelastic material in fixing the knocking tool with a holding jig, the peening was performed with the method according to the second embodiment while the knocking tool was held in such a way as illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9. The method is described below.

(104) Steel sheets (thickness of 2.9 mm) were subjected to lap fillet arc welding under the conditions listed in Table 1 to produce various lap fillet arc welded joints. Next, a weld toe 4 of each produced lap fillet arc welded joint was subjected to peening using an air-driven (air pressure of 0.5 MPa) device under the conditions listed in Tables 2 and 12 while a knocking pin 5 was oscillated in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction around the weld toe 4.

(105) The peening was performed until a slag of the surface of the weld toe 4 was fractured and the internal metallic luster was exposed. Further, the used knocking pin 5 had a tip with a hemispherical shape.

(106) A knocking tool 17 was clamped with a viscoelastic material 20 as illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9 by inserting the viscoelastic material 20 between the knocking tool 17 which has a mechanism of oscillating the knocking pin 5 and a knocking tool holder 18, and fastening a bolt 19. In the example, a gel sheet made of silicon was used as the viscoelastic material 20.

(107) The curvature radius of the weld toe 4 listed in Table 12 were determined by averaging the measurement results at five locations for each welded joint according to NPL 3.

(108) In any example in which the knocking pin 5 was oscillated, in a knocking region 13 determined according to the oscillation width of the knocking pin 5, knocking marks 10 located in an end part along a width direction of the knocking region 13 and superimposed on each other had end parts 101 separated from each other in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction, or knocking marks 10 located in an end part along the width direction of the knocking region 13 were contacting with each other in the welding direction at three knock points or less.

(109) Test pieces having a shape illustrated in FIG. 7 were collected from the lap fillet arc welded joints after the peening so that a weld bead 11 became the center part of the test piece. Using the test pieces, plane bending fatigue test was conducted in accordance with JIS Z 2275 under the conditions listed in Table 10 to evaluate fatigue properties based on the following criterion.

(110) Passed (Particularly Excellent): Fatigue life was beyond three million times (if the test piece was not fractured at a stress repeating count of three million, fatigue life was judged as beyond three million times).

(111) Passed (Excellent): Fatigue life was two million times or more and three million times or less.

(112) Failed: Fatigue life was less than two million times.

(113) The evaluation results are also listed in Table 12.

(114) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Peening conditions Curvature Curvature radius of weld Tensile radius of toe before Knocking streangth of knocking pin peening angle Oscillation Oscillation Scanning base sheet ρ.sub.p ρ.sub.a β width frequency rate No. (MPa) (mm) (mm) (°) (mm) (Hz) (mm/s) 102 980 0.5 1.8 0 3 7 3 115 980 0.5 1.8 0 3 7 3 Shape of weld toe after peening Peening Ratio of total conditions Width of length of Presence/ Curvature Width of knocking knocking marks absence of radius of one knocking mark on weld toe to viscoelastic knocking mark group whole length of material of mark L0 L2 weld toe Fatigue life No. holder (mm) (mm) (mm) (%) (times) Remarks 102 absent 1.5 1 3 90 2.1 mill. Example 115 present 1.5 1.5 3 100 beyond 3 mill. Example

(115) As listed in Table 12, particularly excellent fatigue life was obtained when the knocking tool was clamped with the viscoelastic material.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

(116) 1: Thin steel sheet (base sheet) 2: Thin steel sheet (base sheet) 3: Weld metal 4: Weld toe 5: Knocking pin 6: Knocking pin tip 7: Fold mark of a weld toe 8: Fold mark at a knocking mark edge 9: Weld ripple 10: Knocking mark 101: End part in a direction orthogonal to the welding direction of a knocking mark 11: Weld bead 12: Knocking mark group 121: End part of a knocking mark group 13: Knocking region 17: Knocking tool 18: Knocking tool holder 19: Bolt 20: Viscoelastic material