Fuse-Protected Electronic Photodiode Array
20170084645 ยท 2017-03-23
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H10F39/107
ELECTRICITY
H01H2085/0275
ELECTRICITY
H10F39/103
ELECTRICITY
H01H85/25
ELECTRICITY
H10F30/22
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
There is provided a photodiode array including a semiconducting substrate and a plurality of photodiodes that are disposed at a surface of the substrate. Each photodiode is laterally spaced apart from neighboring photodiodes by a lateral substrate surface region. An optical interface surface of the substrate is arranged for accepting external input radiation. A plurality of electrically conducting fuses are disposed on the substrate surface. Each fuse is connected to a photodiode in the plurality of photodiodes. Each fuse is disposed at a lateral substrate surface region that is spaced apart from neighboring photodiodes in the plurality of photodiodes.
Claims
1. A photodiode array comprising: a semiconducting substrate; a plurality of photodiodes disposed at a surface of the substrate with each photodiode laterally spaced apart from neighboring photodiodes by a lateral substrate surface region; an optical interface surface of the substrate arranged for accepting external input radiation; and a plurality of electrically conducting fuses disposed on the substrate surface, each fuse connected to a photodiode in the plurality of photodiodes and each fuse disposed at a lateral substrate surface region spaced apart from neighboring photodiodes in the plurality of photodiodes.
2. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each fuse in the plurality of fuses includes a first fuse end electrically connected to a photodiode and includes a second fuse end, with a fuse material length between the first and second fuse ends, and further comprising an electrical connection from the second fuse end to a photodiode array read-out circuit.
3. The photodiode array of claim 2 wherein the read out circuit comprises a read-out circuit substrate and wherein the electrical connection from the second fuse end to a photodiode array read-out circuit comprises an electrically conducting bump bonded between the second fuse end and the read-out circuit substrate.
4. The photodiode array of claim 2 wherein the electrical connection from the second fuse end to a photodiode array read-out circuit is at a substrate location that is laterally spaced apart from each photodiode in the plurality of photodiodes.
5. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each photodiodes in the photodiode array comprises an avalanche photodiode.
6. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein the each photodiode in the photodiode array comprises a mesa of photodiode multiplier and absorber material layers and having a mesa top surface for electrical connection to the photodiode.
7. The photodiode array of claim 6 further comprising, for each photodiode, an electrical connection from the photodiode mesa top surface to a fuse disposed at a substrate location that is laterally spaced apart from the photodiode mesa layers.
8. The photodiode array of claim 7 wherein the electrical connection from the photodiode mesa top surface to a fuse is nonplanar and wherein the fuse comprises a planar fuse material disposed on the substrate surface.
9. The photodiode array of claim 6 wherein the mesa top surface is at a mesa height and wherein the fuse comprises a planar fuse material disposed on the substrate surface at a fuse height below the mesa height.
10. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each fuse includes an adhesion layer underlying fuse material.
11. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each fuse includes an oxidation inhibitor layer overlying fuse material.
12. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each fuse comprises a fuse material region disposed at a lateral substrate surface region on top of a layer of passivation material disposed on the substrate surface.
13. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein each fuse comprises a fuse material length having a top surface, at least a portion of the fuse length top surface including no layer there on and being exposed a plurality of electrically conducting fuses.
14. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein the plurality of photodiodes are arranged as photodiode rows and photodiode columns and wherein the plurality of fuses are arranged as fuse rows and fuse columns that are laterally spaced apart from the photodiode rows and photodiode columns.
15. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein the optical interface surface of the substrate is opposite the substrate surface at which the photodiodes and fuses are disposed.
16. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein the substrate comprises InP and each photodiode comprises an InP layer.
17. The photodiode array of claim 1 wherein at least one fuse comprises a fuse length of fuse material that is discontinuous at a site along the fuse length.
18. A photodiode array comprising: a semiconducting substrate; a plurality of photodiodes disposed at a surface of the substrate with each photodiode comprising a mesa of photodiode material layers that are laterally spaced apart from neighboring photodiodes by a lateral substrate surface region; an optical interface surface of the substrate arranged for accepting external input radiation; and a plurality of electrically conducting fuses disposed on the substrate surface, each fuse connected to a photodiode in the plurality of photodiodes by a fuse connection extending between a top surface of a photodiode mesa and a first end of a fuse, and each fuse disposed at a lateral substrate surface region spaced apart from neighboring photodiode mesas in the plurality of photodiodes.
19. The photodiode array of claim 18 wherein each fuse includes a second end that is electrically connected to a read-out circuit substrate by an electrically conducting bump.
20. The photodiode array of claim 18 wherein the plurality of photodiodes are arranged as photodiode mesa rows and photodiode mesa columns and wherein the plurality of fuses are arranged as fuse rows and fuse columns that are laterally spaced apart from the photodiode mesa rows and photodiode mesa columns.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0020] Referring to
[0021] Each fuse 16 is electrically connected to a photodiode 12 by a first electrical connection 18 that extends between the photodiode 12 and a first end of the fuse. Each fuse also includes a second electrical connection 22 extending from a second end 24 of the fuse 16 to a substrate site that is spaced from the photodiode, for electrical connection to photodiode array circuitry such as read out circuitry (ROIC). With this arrangement, an electrical connection between a given photodiode and circuitry such as a ROIC extends from the photodiode through a first electrical connection 18, through a fuse 16, and then through a second electrical connection 22. The second electrical connection 22 is in mechanical contact with an electrical connection for the ROIC, as explained in detail below. A fuse is therefore included in series with an electrical connection between each photodiode and photodiode circuitry such as a ROIC.
[0022] If the flow of electrical current from the photodiode through the first electrical connection and to the fuse is greater than a threshold electrical current that the fuse material can withstand, then the fuse material will degrade, deteriorate, burn, vaporize, or otherwise become corrupted so that fuse material becomes discontinuous at one or more sites along the fuse length and width; the path for electrical conduction through the fuse is broken. As a result, the series connection between the photodiode and the photodiode circuitry is broken. The fuse thereby operates as a protective element that disallows high electrical current levels from flowing between a photodiode and photodiode array circuitry. A separate, distinct fuse is provided for each photodiode in the photodiode array to ensure that the photodiode circuitry is protected from high current levels flowing through any photodiode in the array.
[0023] The photodiodes in
[0024] In one example embodiment, circular mesa photodiodes of 12 microns in diameter are arranged in rows and columns of an array with a 20 micron pitch, with a spacing of 8 microns from the edge of one photodiode to the next, and with fuses provided between the photodiodes on the substrate. This is one general example; no particular photodiode array pitch or fuse distance is required. All that is required is that each photodiode fuse be provided laterally spaced from each photodiode, so that no fuse overlaps with photodiode structures. In general, the greater the edge-to-edge distance between photodiodes, within which distance a fuse is placed, the easier it is to microfabricate the photodiodes and fuses, and the less likely the probability for a fuse destruction to damage a neighboring photodiode. But even with very high pitch requirements, such as 1 micron-diameter photodiodes arranged with 5 micron pitch in an array of photodiodes, fuses of 2 microns wide and 2 microns long can be included on the substrate without laterally overlapping with the photodiodes.
[0025] As shown in
[0026] With this fuse and photodiode configuration, there is no requirement that a protective passivation layer be provided over the material composition of the fuse, and it can indeed be preferred that no passivation layer be provided over the fuse material, so that at least a portion of the fuse material length is exposed. As explained above, if the electrical current flow from a photodiode to a fuse is greater than a threshold electrical current that the fuse material can withstand, then the fuse material becomes discontinuous at one or more sites along the fuse length. If a passivation layer were to be provided over the fuse material, the enclosure of the fuse material with the passivating material could lead to the formation of a reconnection of fuse material atoms under the passivating material. This reconnection could re-establish a conductive path through the fuse and re-establish electrical conductivity between the photodiode and the photodiode array circuitry, with subsequent reconnection of the shorted circuit and possible damage to the circuitry unless/until the fuse material again disconnects. It is therefore preferred that no passivation layer be provided over the fuse material.
[0027] This exclusion of passivating material over the fuse material renders the fuse material substantially exposed and results in the exposure of photodiodes to the destruction of the fuse during a short circuiting event. The lateral spacing of fuses away from photodiodes in the manner shown in
[0028] The fuse material composition, fuse material thickness, and lateral fuse geometry are determined based on the operational and performance specifications for a given photodiode array application. Referring to
[0029] The fuse material thickness, T, length, L, and width, W, are selected to cause the fuse material to become discontinuous at one or more sites along the length of the fuse material when an electrical current above a specified threshold short circuiting electrical current is conducted through the fuse material. The fuse material may be burned, vaporized, or otherwise degraded or destroyed by an electrical current flow that is greater than the specified threshold short circuiting electrical current. Fuse material thickness is preferably selected based on a desired burn-out current and in one embodiment, can range in thickness between, e.g., about 10 to about 100 microns. An adhesion layer can be provided of a selected material and a thickness of between about, e.g., 20 and 200 . An anti-oxidation layer can be provided with a suitable thickness of, e.g., between about 20 and about 500 . In one example embodiment, given a specified electrical short circuiting level of electrical current through the fuse material of about 4.5 mA, then a Ni anti-oxidation layer of about 20 in thickness, an Al fuse layer of about 75 in thickness, and a Ti adhesion layer of about 20 in thickness are employed. The short circuiting current level that causes deterioration, or burn-out, of a fuse, is generally independent of applied voltage, and here for example, is between about 75 V and 100 V.
[0030] As shown in
[0031] The microelectronic fuse geometry provided herein can be integrated into any suitable photodiode platform, substrate, or other photodiode array structure for which fuses are desired. Further, the photodiode array can be customized, e.g., by including structures and materials for reducing cross-talk between neighboring photodiodes in the array. Other microfabrication features as well as system features can be included, e.g., such as a microlens array or other structural feature, as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0169117, published Jul. 14, 2011, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
[0032] Referring to
[0033] Referring to
[0034] Referring to
[0035] Referring to
[0036] As shown in
[0037] As shown in
Experimental Example I
[0038] Microelectronic fuses having a range of geometries were microfabricated. Electrical short circuiting events for which the fuses were to operate by breakage of fusing electrical connectivity were defined with a threshold short circuiting current of about 4.510.sup.3 A. A maximum leakage current to be conducted through a burned-out fuse length was specified as about 10.sup.7 A at a voltage of about 70 V. The experimental fuse geometry was specified to accommodate a photodiode array pitch as small as 20 m. Both fuse material and fuse dimensions of length, width, and neck angle, , as shown in
[0039] Fuses were microfabricated by first spin-coating on InP substrates a 2 m-thick layer of polyimide, which was then cured at 220 C. for 1 hour in a nitrogen environment. The polyimide layer was then coated with a 2000 -thick layer of SiN.sub.x that was deposited at 300 C. in a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition system. Single-layer fuse structures having various dimensions were then defined using conventional photolithography and electron-beam deposition. The deposition was performed in a dual shutter electron-beam evaporation system in which the deposition rate could be measured prior to opening the second shutter for metallization of the sample. The deposition rate of the fuse metal layers was 1 /s. The rate was monitored using a standard quartz crystal. The final fabrication step was a second photolithography process followed by electron beam deposition of 100 m100 m Ti/Au (200 /2000 ) square contact pads on both ends of the fuse to be used for electrical probing.
[0040] The fuse structures had fuse lengths that varied between 2 m and 20 m in 2 m increments. For each fuse length, fuses were fabricated with widths varying from 2 m-20 m in 2 m increments. For each fuse length-width combination, fuse neck angles of 90, 110, 135, and 160 were fabricated The fuses were fabricated with thicknesses ranging from between about 10 -250 . Fuses were fabricated of the electrically conducting materials Ti, Au, Pt, Al, S, Ni, and Ge.
[0041] The electrical current at which each fuse deteriorated or burned out was determined by performing voltage sweeps across each fuse using 0.1 V, 200 ms steps in voltage while measuring the electrical current through a fuse. Each fuse was configured in the test circuit in series with a 2 k resistor. The burn-out current was defined as the highest current reached before an order of magnitude drop in current was measured.
[0042] In analyzing the various experimental fuse materials, it was found that a fuse thickness of about 100 formed of aluminum produced fuses with the desired burn-out currents, on the order of 5-10 mA, and leakage currents through burned-out fuses of less than about 10.sup.7 A after burnout. In addition, it was observed that test fuses with 135 neck angles and lengths longer than 4 m were the least likely to have burn-out events away from the center of the fuse, near the bond pads.
Experimental Example II
[0043] Based on the results of the first experiments, a second set of experiments was carried out to refine the performance of Al-based fuses. The goal of these experiments was to better understand the burn-out current of the fuses as a function of length and width as well as to optimize fabrication compatibility with photodiode array fabrication. The fuse structures had fuse lengths that varied between 2 m and 20 m in 2 m increments. For each fuse length, fuses were fabricated with widths varying from 2 m-20 m in 2 m increments. For each fuse length-width combination, fuse neck angles of 135 and 142 were fabricated. The fuses were fabricated with thicknesses ranging from between about 10 -250 . Fuses were fabricated of the electrically conducting material Al in the manner of Example I. Adhesion and oxidation prevention metal layers were here also added to the fuse test structures. The lower-most layer was a 20 -thick Ti layer deposited on the substrate to provide adhesion. The second layer, the active fuse material, was an Al layer. The thickness of this layer was varied to adjust the burn-out current. The upper layer was a Ni layer used to prevent oxidation of the Al layer beneath it. 20 and 50 Ni layers were produced. In addition, fuse structures having neck angles of either 135 or 1.42 were produced.
[0044] Each of the microfabricated fuses was subjected to electrical current flow using an automated probing station, again in series with a 2 k resistor in the testing procedure of Example I.
Experimental Example III
[0045] A third set of experiments was carried out to refine the fuse burn-out current characteristics for a fuse of aluminum and including a lower Ti adhesion layer and an upper Ni oxidation resistance layer as in
[0046] Using the testing procedure of Example I, the burn-out currents of the microfabricated fuses were measured by sweeping the voltage across the fuses from 0 V to 70 V using 0.1 V, 500 ms steps, while measuring the electrical current through the test circuit. The fuses were here configured in series with a 2 k resistor as in Examples I-II. For each fuse length-thickness combination, five data points were measured.
Experimental Example IV
[0047] With a minimum fuse burn-out electrical current specified as 4.510.sup.3 A, 8 m-long and 2 m-wide aluminum fuses were incorporated into a 25664 pixel InP-based Geiger-mode APD array following the microfabrication procedure described above. The photodiodes of the array were configured with a 50 m pitch. The fuses were fabricated including a 20 -thick titanium adhesion layer and a 20 -thick nickel anti-oxidation layer.
[0048] Without prescreening for defective photodiodes, the fuse-protected APD array was bump-bonded to a ROIC for operation of the APD array. The photodiode array was controlled with the ROIC to electrically bias each photodiode in the array. First, the voltage bias of the array was slowly increased from 0 V to an operating voltage of about 68 V.
[0049] These experiments confirmed that aluminum fuses can protect a photodiode array circuit to accommodate a burn-out current of 2 mA-10 mA with fuse structures that are laterally offset from photodiode structures on a photodiode array substrate, and can operate as-specified to protect a Geiger-mode APD array circuitry from short circuit events across the photodiode array. The fuse material thickness, length, and width can be controlled to set a prespecified electrical short circuit current for which protection is needed.
[0050] The fuse-enabled APD described herein is particularly well-suited for linear-mode as well as Geiger-mode APD arrays. But in general, the fuse arrangement provided herein can also be employed with any photodiode arrangement. No particular photodiode array configuration or operational limitations are required, and any suitable microfabrication sequence that accommodates fabrication of fuses on a substrate, laterally separated from photodiodes, can be employed. Other device and substrate structures can be included with the photodiode array, such as cross talk absorption materials, cross talk filter materials, lens arrays, and circuit configurations.
[0051] The fuse design and configuration provided herein enables both an increase in microfabrication throughput as well as increased operational reliability in the production and operation of photodiode array devices and systems. Conventional microfabrication sequences rely on photodiode device pre-screening for faulty photodiodes, adding cost and time to production. Even with such pre-screening, no additional protection is provided against photodiode failure during the photodiode array operation. With the integration of a fuse array that is offset from a photodiode array, the failure of a photodiode results in loss of that one photodiode alone, rather than the entire array and/or array circuitry. It is recognized that those skilled in the art may make various modifications and additions to the embodiments described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the present contribution to the art. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the protection sought to be afforded hereby should be deemed to extend to the subject matter claims and all equivalents thereof fairly within the scope of the invention.