Alien crosstalk suppression with enhanced patch cord

Abstract

Systems and methods for decreasing alien crosstalk use enhanced patch cords for introducing additional attenuation. The enhanced patch cords are preferably shielded to reduce alien crosstalk down their lengths and also attenuate signals passing therethrough to a greater extent than standard communication patch cords. The interaction of two enhanced patch cords results in two suppression steps for alien crosstalk and only one suppression step for intended signal passing through a communication cable.

Claims

1. A communication cable comprising a plurality of twisted pairs wherein at least one twisted pair of the plurality of twisted pairs has a first cable lay over a first length of the cable, a second cable lay over a second length of the cable, and a third cable lay over a third length of the cable and further wherein the first, second, and third cable lays are not equal and are all selected from a finite list of cable lay values.

2. The communication cable of claim 1 further comprising a fourth cable lay over a fourth length of the cable, the fourth cable lay not being equal to the first, second, or third cable lay.

3. The communication cable of claim 2 wherein the lengths are equal to ten meters or less.

4. The communication cable of claim 1 wherein the first second and third lengths vary randomly.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a plan view of a communication system according to one embodiment of the present invention;

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a cabling installation with improved patch cords for providing alien crosstalk suppression;

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph showing the increased signal-to-noise ratio in a communication system using an enhanced patch cord according to the present invention;

(4) FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing a conductor and lossy conductor insulation according to one embodiment of the present invention;

(5) FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of stranded wires having a lossy conductive coating;

(6) FIG. 6 is a detail view of the detail A of FIG. 5;

(7) FIGS. 7a and 7b are cross-sectional views showing the comparison of two cable pairs, with the cable pair of FIG. 7b having increased distance between crosstalk pairs;

(8) FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a surrounding shield;

(9) FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a modified surrounding shield;

(10) FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having shielding surrounding each wire pair;

(11) FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a conductive spline;

(12) FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating varying cable lays along the length of a cable.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS

(13) Turning now to FIG. 1, a communication system 10 is shown. In the communication system 10, a network device such as the 10 Gb/s Ethernet switch 12 is connected to a plurality of devices, such as personal computers (PCs) 14 and 16 by first and second communication cables 18 and 20, respectively. It is to be understood that while FIG. 1 shows the communication cables 18 and 20 extending from a single network device to two devices, systems and methods according to the present invention will allow for the suppression of alien crosstalk between communication cables regardless of the types of devices to which the cables are connected.

(14) Generally, alien crosstalk resulting from the interaction between the communication cables 18 and 20 will be coupled along the entire lengths of the cables 18 and 20. The cables 18 and 20 act to suppress signal travelling through them to some degree, such that alien crosstalk occurring between the cables closer to the Ethernet switch 12 will be attenuated somewhat at the PCs 14 and 16.

(15) Crosstalk suppression is enhanced in the system of FIG. 1 by the use of first and second enhanced patch cords 22 and 24. The enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 are designed to suppress crosstalk along their lengths, for example by providing additional shielding. In addition, the enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 attenuate communications signals and noise, such as crosstalk, travelling through them. Attenuation in the patch cords 22 and 24 may be accomplished in a number of ways. For example, attenuation may be increased by the use of finer-gauge wire within the enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 or by increasing the number of twists per inch in wires contained within the patch cords 22 and 24.

(16) The strength of alien crosstalk is dependent upon the strength of the interfering or disturbing signal. Thus, increased attenuation provided by the first enhanced patch cord 22 will reduce the signal level in the first communication cable 18. As a result, the alien crosstalk coupled into the second communication cable 20 from the first communication cable will be reduced due to attenuation by the first enhanced patch cord 22. Because the alien crosstalk caused by the first communication cable 18 in the second communication cable 20 will travel in both directions in the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk will also be subjected to suppression in the second enhanced patch cord 24.

(17) For example, if a signal leaves the Ethernet switch 12 having a signal strength of 1 volt peak-to-peak, and the first enhanced patch cord 22 attenuates to 10% of the initial strength, the signal going from the Ethernet switch 12 to the first PC 14 will have a signal strength of 0.1 volt peak-to-peak. If 10% of that signal couples as alien crosstalk to the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk in the second cable will have a signal strength of 0.01 volt peak-to-peak. If the second enhanced patch cord 24 also has attenuating properties that reduce signals to 10% of the initial strength, the alien crosstalk will be suppressed in the second communication cable 20 to 0.001 volt peak-to-peak. Thus, the alien crosstalk has been subjected to the effects of two enhanced patch cords 22 and 24, and the signal from the Ethernet switch 12 through the second communication cable 20 has been subjected only to the effects of the second enhanced patch cord 24. Optional enhanced patch cords 26 have been shown for connection to the PCs 14 and 16 and similarly operate to reduce alien crosstalk at the user side of the communication connection.

(18) Enhanced patch cords according to the present invention may be integrated into a number of connections, as shown by FIG. 2, in which a horizontal cable plant 28 having multiple cables is enhanced by enhanced patch cords 30 and 32 provided at first and second ends of the communication path.

(19) The enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio using enhanced patch cords according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. The dotted line shows the reduced signal and noise resulting from the enhanced patch cords across the communication frequencies. Because the noise due to alien crosstalk is attenuated to a greater degree than the signal, both the available bandwidth and the signal-to-noise ratio are improved in systems employing enhanced patch cords according to the present invention.

(20) Attenuation may be introduced into patch cords and other communication cabling using a variety of methods. There are two design parameters to consider in the design of a lossy patch cord. One parameter is the amount of insertion loss to include in the cable, and the second is the amount of alien crosstalk suppression or susceptibility to have in the cable. Both parameters are preferably addressed in a cable design.

(21) Dielectric loss may be increased as shown in FIG. 4 by providing a conductor 34 within lossy conductor insulation 36 or 38. Dielectric loss can also be increased by using such methods as: (a) cable jacket dielectric lossy material; (b) cable spline dielectric lossy material; and (c) a wire pair shield (which concentrates the E&M field through the wire insulation).

(22) The use of a less conductive wire (for example, aluminum wire instead of copper wire) will also increase conductor loss. As mentioned above, conductor loss can also be increased by decreasing the conductor wire diameter or increasing the twist per unit length. Increasing the amount of twisting increases the effective length of the cord and hence increases the conductor loss.

(23) Conductor loss can also be increased by tinning a metal wire. A less-conductive coating on the circumference of the wire will increase the conductor loss because the current density congregates near the surface (via the skin effect) and will experience a higher loss through the tinned material. The use of stranded wire can also increase conductor loss, with an increase of loss by roughly 20% for comparable wire gauges. FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a cable 40 employing tinning and stranded wire. In the embodiment of FIG. 5, stranded copper conductors 42 are provided within a tin skin 44. FIG. 6 is a detail view of the detail A of FIG. 5. The skin is provided at a depth d.sub.s.

(24) The use of wire with a roughened surface can also increase the conductor loss through the wire.

(25) FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate a technique to decrease the susceptibility of a cable by increasing the physical distance between crosstalk pairs. First and second cables 46 and 48 are placed in an abutting relationship. When the cable jacket material 50 is increased in thicknessfor example, to jacket 52, as shown in FIG. 7bthe distance between crosstalk pairs is increased from d.sub.1 shown in FIG. 7a to d.sub.2 shown in FIG. 7b. According to one embodiment, the cable jacket material 50 is a foamed jacket material. Cable separators may also be used to increase separation between neighboring cables.

(26) Metallic shielding can also be used to reduce susceptibility of alien signals into a signal cable pair. FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view showing a technique to decrease the susceptibility of a cable by the incorporation of a conductive shield. In FIG. 8, conductive pairs 52 are provided within an overall conductive shield 54. The conductive shield 54, in turn, is provided within a jacket 56. As shown in FIG. 9 (which incorporates a detail view), in another embodiment a layer of overall shielding 54 may be provided between first and second layers 58 and 60 of jacketing material.

(27) FIG. 10 shows another embodiment, in which individual shielding 62 surrounds each wire pair.

(28) Another embodiment is shown in FIG. 11, which illustrates the use of a conductive spline 64 or conductive pair separator used to decrease susceptibility.

(29) In another embodiment, crosstalk may be reduced by modifying the lay of a cable along its length. The lay of a cable refers to the twisting of a cable along its length. In this embodiment, fixed twisted pair lengths are provided along the length of a cable. Four or more cable lay values providing a four-pair cable with twisted pair lengths over the length of the cable meeting the proposed 10 Gb/s Ethernet Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) requirement are selected. Any four or more cable lay values are chosen at random, with the selection process being described as follows:

(30) 1. Cable lays A, B, C, D, . . . ) are selected, with each of the lays meeting the 10 Gb/s Ethernet NEXT requirement.

(31) 2. Any of the four cable lays are selected without replacement during the cable lay process.

(32) 3. The selected cable lay is provided over a uniform or random length of cable less than or equal to ten meters.

(33) 4. Any of the three or more remaining cable lays are selected and applied, to the cable construction as described in step 3.

(34) 5. The process is repeated until all cable lays have been assigned.

(35) A diagram of a cable length employing random distances between cable lay transitions and using four different cable lays is shown in FIG. 12.

(36) While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.