Dimming control including an adjustable output response
09596741 ยท 2017-03-14
Assignee
Inventors
- Jared Lemke (Pleasant Grove, UT, US)
- James Beagley (Taylorsville, UT, US)
- Scott Chandler (Spanish Fork, UT, US)
- Michael Whatcott (Lehi, UT, US)
- Douglas Allen (Lindon, UT, US)
- David Earl James (Orem, UT, US)
- Jon Erik Knabenschuh (Orem, UT, US)
Cpc classification
Y02B70/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02B70/3225
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
G05B2219/25401
PHYSICS
Y04S20/246
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y04S20/222
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y02B20/00
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
The present disclosure provides improved dimming or dimmer assemblies/modules for controlling lights or loads (e.g., as part of a control or automation system). More particularly, the present disclosure provides for systems and methods for utilizing dimmer control assemblies/modules advantageously having: (i) an adjustable output response, (ii) enhanced thermal management, (iii) a voltage detector to determine amplitude and zero-crossing, and/or (iv) an estimation of power consumption for multiple loads (e.g., using a single sensor).
Claims
1. A control assembly comprising: a first load circuit, the first load circuit including a first load control device, the first load control device in communication with a first controlled device; a processor in communication with the first load control device; and a first line feed associated with the first load circuit and in communication with the first load control device; wherein at least a portion of the first line feed is configured to travel to and be output by the first load control device as a first load output to the first controlled device; wherein the processor is in communication with the first load control device via a first control signal line; wherein the processor is adapted to store a plurality of individual data points, each individual data point being a value that represents the magnitude of a control signal on the first control signal line that is generated for a different dim level of the first controlled device; wherein the individual data points are spaced apart from one another from a low dim level to a high dim level of the first controlled device; wherein the processor is adapted to determine a magnitude of a first control signal for a first dim level of the first controlled device that is positioned between first and second data points of the plurality of data points, the first and second data points adjacent to one another from the low dim level to the high dim level; wherein the processor is adapted to determine a magnitude of a second control signal for a second dim level of the first controlled device that is positioned between third and fourth data points of the plurality of data points, the third and fourth data points adjacent to one another from the low dim level to the high dim level; wherein the first controlled device has a non-linear relationship between power delivered to the first controlled device and the light intensity of the first controlled device when power is delivered to the first controlled device at each individual data point from the low dim level to the high dim level; and wherein the first controlled device has a linear transition in light intensity between the first dim level and the second dim level.
2. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the processor stores about thirty-three individual data points, each individual data point being spaced apart from one another from the low dim level to the high dim level of the first controlled device; and wherein the first nine data points proximal to the low dim level are spaced apart from one another by about 2% of the total number of dim levels of the first controlled device, and the remaining data points are spaced apart by about 3.5% of the total number of dim levels of the first controlled device.
3. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the data points are generated manually by a user.
4. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the data points are generated by software associated with a light meter, the light meter configured and adapted to measure the light intensity of the first controlled device at a plurality of dim levels.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are further described with reference to the appended figures. It is to be noted that the various features and combinations of features described below and illustrated in the figures can be arranged and organized differently to result in embodiments which are still within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. To assist those of ordinary skill in the art in making and using the disclosed systems, assemblies and methods, reference is made to the appended figures, wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(26) In the description which follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals, respectively. Drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and in certain views, parts may have been exaggerated for purposes of clarity.
(27) The present disclosure provides improved dimming or dimmer assemblies/modules for controlling lights or loads (e.g., as part of a control or automation system). More particularly, the present disclosure provides for systems and methods for utilizing dimmer control assemblies/modules advantageously having: (i) an adjustable output response, (ii) enhanced thermal management, (iii) a voltage detector to determine amplitude and zero-crossing, and/or (iv) an estimation of power consumption for multiple loads (e.g., using a single sensor).
(28) Current practice provides that some of the challenges that arise when designing/creating a dimming module/assembly can include implementing an accurate zero-crossing detector, producing an output that is substantially smooth as the level is adjusted, providing useful feedback to the user regarding the operating conditions such as power consumption of the loads, and/or managing the heat that is generated by the dimming modules or dimming circuits. For example and as noted above in the case of a lighting control, current practice provides that the turn-on timing typically should be consistent from cycle to cycle to ensure that the output does not have any substantial detectable variation when set to a specific level. As such, the method used to detect the zero-crossing typically should be accurate enough to avoid substantial errors in the turn-on that would cause a visibly detectable change in the output. Moreover, current practice also provides that some new load types generally have more unusual output characteristics than in the past when controlled by a dimmer module/assembly, and the output characteristics of these and other loads may have a response that is not able to be adequately corrected for by adding simple curvature to the dimming control signal.
(29) In general, the present disclosure provides for improved dimmer control assemblies/modules having an adjustable output response, enhanced thermal management, a voltage detector to determine amplitude and zero-crossing, and/or an estimation of power consumption for multiple loads, thereby providing a significant commercial, operational and/or manufacturing advantage as a result.
(30) Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to
(31) Examples of suitable control assemblies 15 include, without limitation, dimmer assemblies/modules, electrical control devices, lighting controls, modules, relays, HVAC controls, motor controls, window treatment controls, security controls, temperature controls, water feature controls, media controls and/or audio/video controls or the like. It is noted that the master controller 14 may be the main central processing unit (CPU) of the control or automation system 10, or it may be an access point to the automation system network. As noted, an exemplary control or automation system 10 of the present disclosure is depicted in
(32) In general, the master controller 14 may transmit command signals to control assemblies 15 (e.g., to processor 12
(33) The master controller 14 may receive status signals from the control assemblies 15 regarding the status of a controlled device 17. In certain embodiments, at least one control assembly 15 includes a controllably conductive device, such as, for example, a relay or triac, to control power to a controlled device 17. In general, control assemblies 15 may be wall-box mounted or enclosure mounted. The control assemblies 15 may include control points, or the control points may be separate, such as, for example, a keypad. More particularly and as shown in
(34) In general and as shown in
(35) In general, dimmer module/assembly 15 is configured and adapted to control at least one controlled device 17 (e.g., at least one light or load). In exemplary embodiments and as discussed further below, dimmer module/assembly 15 of system 10 is configured and adapted to control at least twelve controlled devices 17 (e.g., at least twelve lights or loads) (
(36) In exemplary embodiments and as shown in
(37) In general, processor 12 is in communication with (e.g., via control lines/signals) at least one load circuit 16.
(38) In exemplary embodiments, processor 12 is in communication with four load circuits 16 (
(39) In general, load circuit 16 includes at least one load output 23. In exemplary embodiments and as shown in
(40) As shown in
(41) In exemplary embodiments, load circuit 16 includes three load control devices 25, although the present disclosure is not limited thereto. Load circuit 16 may include any number of load control devices 25. In general, at least a portion of the line feed 18 of load circuit 16 travels to load control device 25 and is output as a load output 23 by load control device 25 (e.g., to device 17). Load control device 25 typically is in communication with processor 12 (e.g., via communication lines and/or control/status signals) for control purposes (e.g., for control of controlled device 17).
(42) The present disclosure will be further described with respect to the following examples; however, the scope of the disclosure is not limited thereby.
EXAMPLE 1
Estimating Individual Load Consumption
(43) As noted above and with reference to
(44) In other words, each load circuit 16 typically includes both a voltage detector 31 and a current detector 33 for its respective line feed 18 to allow for, inter alia, calculation of power consumption. As noted above, each load circuit 16 typically includes three load outputs 23 (e.g., each line feed 18 has three load outputs 23). Each load output 23 typically is in communication with a load or controlled device 17 for control purposes. As shown in
(45) In general, the voltage input typically will be substantially the same for each load output 23 on a line feed 18, so a single voltage detector or sensor 31 per line feed 18 is sufficient to accurately measure the voltage for each load output 23. However, each load output 23 on a line feed 18 can be using a different amount of current at any given moment, so a single current detector or sensor 33 typically can provide a direct measurement of the total current in all three load outputs 23, but not each load output 23 individually when they are all turned on. Additionally, the current drawn by a controlled device 17 (e.g., a light or load) attached to a load output 23 may vary depending on the type of controlled device 17 (e.g., on the load type) and/or on the dim level of the controlled device 17. It is noted that this problem could be solved by placing a current detector/sensor 33 or the like on each load 17, but this would quickly add cost to the assembly 15, and/or would take additional board space (e.g., PCB space) that may not be available.
(46) In exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, dimmer module/assembly 15 advantageously utilizes a single current detector/sensor 33 for each load circuit 16 to save cost and space. It is noted that a measurement of the current drawn by each individual load output is desired. In this regard, the systems, assemblies and methods of the present disclosure advantageously utilize the information from the single current detector/sensor 33 to accurately calculate an estimate of the individual load 17 values. In exemplary embodiments, these systems/methods are based on the concept of calibrating each load 17 by taking measurements while only one load or controlled device 17 at a time is turned on and then using this data to calculate the estimate.
(47) For example, a purely resistive load or controlled device 17 presents a fixed impedance that does not substantially vary significantly due to external conditions. Since the impedance is generally fixed, the amount of current that will flow through it can be calculated based on the applied voltage. One measurement of the load output 23 current can be taken at a known voltage to determine the resistance and then that resistance can be used to calculate the current for other voltages. In the case of a sinusoidal voltage, the current can be measured at one point in the waveform, and that measurement can be used to determine the current at any other point in the waveform. The current through a controlled device 17 that presents a fixed impedance generally has the same amplitude at a given point in the cycle, regardless what dim level the device 17 is set on.
(48) In general, one of the most common load types or controlled devices 17 is an incandescent bulb. An incandescent bulb generally is a resistive load, but the resistance typically varies significantly with temperature. It has been found that an incandescent bulb is sensitive enough to temperature that it will have a different resistance at different dimming levels.
(49) Other practical examples of loads 17 that are becoming more common are dimmable compact-fluorescent light (CFL) and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. In general, these bulbs use electronic ballasts that often present a distorted current waveform when dimmed. These tend to be non-sinusoidal and also typically make it difficult to predict the current from a single measurement.
(50) The following are advantageous methods to estimate the power consumed by the individual loads 17 using a single current detector/sensor 33 in load circuit 16.
(51) Method 1:
(52) In exemplary embodiments, a calibration sequence is run by processor 12 after the loads 17 are connected (e.g., after a load or controlled device 17 is connected to each load output 23 of load circuit 16). For example, the calibration sequence turns on each load 17 separately and/or individually (e.g., while all the other loads 17 are turned off or are not turned on) at multiple dim levels from low to high (e.g., about eight different dim levels), and processor 12 then stores a measurement of the average power consumed by each load 17 at each of these dim levels. At each dim level (and for each load 17 individually), the current measurements are provided by the current detector 33, and the voltage measurements are provided by the voltage detector 31. The current and voltage measurements are then utilized by processor 12 to calculate the average power consumed by each load 17 at each of the dim levels.
(53) These stored power measurements/levels then form a calibration table for each load 17. When a load 17 is in operation, its respective stored data can then be used (e.g., by processor 12) to calculate and/or interpolate the power consumption of the load 17 at the actual dim level that is being used at the moment.
(54) In exemplary embodiments, storing a plurality (e.g., about eight) different points/measurements of power drawn, with each point/measurement being substantially evenly-spaced apart from one another at differing dim levels, has been found sufficient to provide a very accurate estimate of power consumption of the load 17 at the actual dim level that is being used at the moment. For the loads that were tested, the response was curved near the beginning and the end of the dim settings, and was substantially linear or straight in the middle of the dim settings (
(55) Method 2:
(56) This method estimates the average power drawn for a single load using a single calibration measurement for the load, the dimming level for the load, and a measurement of the total average power used by all of the loads connected to a single current detector 33 including the load for which power is being estimated. The calibration measurement is performed after the loads 17 are connected. It is measured for each load output 23 of circuit 16 set to a level of full on one at a time. The average power measurements are obtained by using the measurements from the current detector 33 and voltage detector 31. For reference, the average power may be calculated by measuring the instantaneous current and voltage at multiple (may be 12) points spaced evenly over the period of a half cycle (for AC power); multiplying the current and voltage measurements at each point to obtain a set of instantaneous power measurements; and then taking the average of the instantaneous results by dividing by the number of points (12 in this case).
(57) In exemplary embodiments, when the dimmer module 15 is in normal operation, the average power for each load 17 can be estimated by a novel calculation that uses the calibration data along with the dimming level for each load 17 and the total average power measured for the loads 17 connected to a single current sensor 33. In general this method provides for a faster calibration process and requires less memory storage on processor 12 since only one calibration calculation needs to be made and stored for each load, and the calibration calculation typically only requires measurements made at a single dimming level. This method, however, can be less accurate when compared to Method 1 described above. The novel calculation is shown below in Equation 1.
(58)
(59) Where Pload, the result of the calculation, is the average power used by one particular load 17, and the other parameters are obtained as follows.
(60) Pex
(61) This is the calculated average power that would be consumed if the load was a fixed resistive load dimmed at the level that the actual load is currently being dimmed at. It is calculated using the calibrated power measurement along with the dimming level using the following Equation 2:
Pex=DimPercentPcalEquation 2:
(62) Where Pcal is the calibrated value that has been stored for this load as described above, and DimPercent is the percentage of the available input signal that is being output to the load by the dimmer.
(63) Pd
(64) This is the difference between the total measured power (Ptm) for all of the loads connected to a single current detector and the sum of the values of Pex for each of the loads connected to that current detector.
(65) Pw
(66) This is a weighted value for this load calculated using the following Equation 3:
Pw=DimPercentPcalPercentEquation 3:
(67) Where DimPercent is the same as described above and PcalPercent is value of Pcal for this load divided by the sum of the values of Pcal for all the loads connected to this current detector.
(68) Ptw
(69) This is the sum of the values of Pw for each of the loads connected to this current detector.
(70) Example Calculation:
(71) As an example suppose there are three loads that are each dimmed at 50% connected to a single current detector. The loads are all incandescent light bulbs where Load1 is a 300 W rated bulb, Load2 is 60 W rated bulb, and Load 3 is a 40 W rated bulb. First, we measure Pcal for each load and get the following:
Pcal1=287
Pcal2=58
Pcal3=39
(72) With all the loads turned on and dimmed to 50%, we measure Ptm to be 224.5.
(73) Next, we calculate the value of Pex for each load.
Pex1=0.5*287=143.5
Pex2=0.5*58=29
Pex3 0.5*39=19.5
(74) Calculate Pd.
Pd=Ptm(Pex1+Pex2+Pex3)=224.5(143.5+29+19.5)=32.5
(75) Calculate Pw for each load.
Pw1=0.5*Pcal1/(Pcal1+Pcal2+Pcal3)=0.5*287/(287+58+39)=0.374
Pw2=0.5*Pcal2/(Pcal1+Pcal2+Pcal3)=0.5*58/(287+58+39)=0.076
Pw3=0.5*Pcal3/(Pcal1+Pcal2+Pcal3)=0.5*39/(287+58+39)=0.051
(76) Calculate Ptw.
Ptw=Pw1+Pw2+Pw3=0.374+0.076+0.051=0.501
(77) Then the final calculation gives the average power for each load as,
Pload1=143.5+0.374*32.5/0.501=167.8
Pload2=29+0.076*32.5/0.501=33.9
Pload3=19.5+0.051*32.5/0.501=22.8
(78) For comparison, the actual measured power for each load in this case was:
Pactual1=171
Pactual2=35.5
Pactual3=24
EXAMPLE 2
Voltage Detector to Determine Amplitude and Zero-Crossing
(79) As noted above and with reference to
(80) In exemplary embodiments and as shown in
(81) In exemplary embodiments and as shown in
(82) In exemplary embodiments, the amplitude of the voltage for a given line feed 18 can be determined by testing the circuit to find the ratio of the input line feed 18 voltage to the voltage that is present at the ADC 39 input. This ratio can be used as a multiplier to calculate the line feed 18 voltage. This amplitude measurement is useful for diagnostic purposes as well as in calculating power consumption for the line feed 18.
(83) In general, accurately detecting the voltage zero-crossing point of the power supply's (e.g., line feed 18) waveform is useful in AC dimming circuits. For example, it is used to keep the dimming signal synchronized with the alternating line feed 18 voltage. The voltage detector 31 circuit described provides an isolated and scaled-down representation of the line feed 18 voltage. In general, the ADC 39 is configured and adapted to take many sample measurements of the voltage that is present at the ADC input during each cycle of the line feed 18. These sample measurements may then be broken down into groups (e.g., one group is 12 samples, with one sample taken about every 63 s), and then further analyzed. One exemplary process (e.g., via processor 12) is as follows: 1) Take the average of each group of sample measurements to determine if the average is higher or lower than zero (positive or negative). 2) Continue until a group of samples has an average value that is opposite (e.g., positive or negative) from the previous group. For example, the previous group's average was higher than zero and the current group's average is lower than zero. 3) If the group sizes are large enough (e.g., about 12 samples per group), then a transition of the average as described in step 2 above indicates that a zero crossing occurred within those two groups of samples. 4) Analyze the individual samples in the two groups from step 2 above to determine the zero-crossing point.
(84) One exemplary implementation configures/adapts the ADC 39 to take one sample of the voltage that is present at the ADC input about every 63 s, and uses groups of 12 samples. It has been found, after much experimentation and calculation, that this method provided excellent performance without requiring too much processing time. In addition, the direct-memory-access (DMA) function of the processor or microcontroller 12 can advantageously be utilized to transfer the sample measurements directly to memory storage of processor 12 to await processing via the processor 12.
(85) Several investigations were completed for performing step 4 above (analyzing the individual samples in the two groups to determine the zero-crossing point). One successful approach was to program the processor 12 to draw lines between pairs of points in the sample set and interpolate the zero-crossings for the lines. This gives a group of zero-cross estimates that can be analyzed to choose the likely zero-cross point. Many combinations for the pairs were attempted, including, without limitation, the following: A) Start with the first point in a group and create pairs with all the other points in that group, then move to the next point of that group and continue this way all the way through the set of points in that group. For example and with reference to
(86) As noted, Method C above is called the sequential lines method. During testing, the sequential lines method performed better than the other line-drawing methods (e.g., better than Methods A and B noted above). An example drawing of the sequential lines method is shown in
(87) After determining the zero-crossing estimate for each line drawn between two points, the group of estimates can be used to determine where the actual zero-cross of the AC supply occurred. In one embodiment, the average of the zero-crossings of all of the drawn lines is used as the estimate of the zero-cross of the AC supply. In another embodiment, the median of the zero-crossings of all of the drawn lines is used as the estimate of the zero-cross of the AC supply.
(88) In exemplary embodiments, an oscilloscope can be used to measure the amount of variation between the final estimate of the zero-cross and the actual zero-cross of the signal. It has been found that taking a median of the zero-crossings of the drawn lines, as opposed to an average, improves the accuracy of the result, e.g., there is less measured variation between the median and the actual zero-cross of the AC supply than between the average and the actual zero-cross. By nature, the median ignores situations where a single point (or small number of points compared to the total number) is significantly in error.
(89) Another investigation that was completed for performing step 4 above (analyzing the individual samples in the two groups to determine the zero-crossing point) included using a least squares calculation. The least squares method performed well, but it was not quite as accurate as the sequential lines method discussed above, for the conditions tested. In one test, the least squares calculation had about 58 s of measured variation compared to about 51 s of measured variation for the sequential lines method.
EXAMPLE 3
Adjustable Output-Response Curve
(90) As noted above, current practice provides that some new load types generally have more unusual output characteristics than in the past when controlled by a dimmer module/assembly, and the output characteristics of these and other loads may have a response that is not able to be adequately corrected for by adding simple curvature to the dimming control signal.
(91) For example, to generally provide high quality dimming, some dimmer modules have incorporated therein a trim and/or linearization value. The trim value typically allows the dimming range to be adjusted so that the dimming signal stays out of areas near the high and/or low end (e.g., areas that typically do not change the output). If the lighting load normally does not turn on until the control signal level is increased beyond about 10%, then the trim value can generally be set to about 10% on the low end. This typically causes the control signal to start from about 10% as the lowest dim setting, and then all other dimming steps are typically divided up between about 10% and about 100%, instead of the original 0% to 100%.
(92) In general, the linearization value allows the control signal to be adjusted so that it varies in a non-linear fashion. This typically allows the output to be adjusted to try to match a substantially smooth response for the human eye. Some manufacturers use a method that causes the linearization value to adjust the control signal by introducing some amount of curvature to its output over the dimming range. In general, increasing and decreasing the linearization value affects how extreme the curvature is. On some dimmer assemblies/products, about ten data points are taken from the desired curve and programmed into the dimmers by the main controller. This typically keeps the storage space for the curve data fairly low, but generally means that the resolution of the actual curve used by the dimmers may be limited. To help with this, more of the data points may be located near the beginning and end of the curve where more detail is often required with common load types. See, e.g.,
(93) However, some new load types have more unusual output characteristics than in the past when controlled by a dimmer module/assembly. For example, these include compact-fluorescent lights (CFL) and light-emitting diodes (LED). The output characteristics of these and other loads may have a response that is not able to be adequately corrected for by adding simple curvature to the dimming control signal, as some have accomplished with a linearization value. Moreover, the response may also vary to an extent that about ten data points is no longer generally sufficient to describe a curve to correct it. For example, the output of such a load may look like that as shown in
(94) In exemplary embodiments, the present disclosure provides for a new linearization scheme that can compensate for loads with irregular output responses. In one embodiment, a table of about thirty-three (33) data points is utilized to describe the shape of the dimming control signal as it varies from low to high (dim level). It has advantageously been found that having about this many data points (e.g., about thirty-three) gives one the resolution to compensate for very extreme load responses.
(95) In exemplary embodiments, about the first nine or so data points may be positioned/measured closer together as compared to the remainder of the data points, in order to provide extra precision on the low end. It is noted that more data points (greater than about 33 data points) can be utilized if desired, although adding more data points to the linearization scheme adds additional storage on the dimmer module/assembly 15 (e.g., on processor 12), and/or on system 10 (e.g., on master controller 14).
(96) In exemplary embodiments, each data point is a 16-bit value that represents the magnitude of the control signal that should be generated for the dim level corresponding to that data point. In general, the dimmer module/assembly 15 utilizes interpolation (e.g., via processor 12) to estimate the desired control signal output for dim levels that fall between the data points.
(97)
(98) It is noted that one can still use these data points to describe a simple curved correction, but now a user can also create a table of data points to describe a more complex curve that can be used to correct a load that provides an arbitrary response. For example, this table of data points can be generated manually by viewing the appropriate output of a load (e.g., intensity of a light), manually adjusting the values stored in the relevant table(s) in the controller software, and then checking the result.
(99) Another option is to automate the process of generating the linearization data for a load 17 (e.g., a light fixture) using software 24 to control a light meter 11 and a dimmer module/assembly 15, as shown in
(100) In exemplary embodiments, the process has two basic steps. First, the software 24 gathers data about the output response of the light fixture 17. Second, the software 24 compares this data to the desired response and generates a linearization table that will achieve the desired response.
(101) The first step of gathering the data can be accomplished by setting the dimmer output to multiple levels from 0% to 100%. The output signal of the dimmer in this case should be linear as it is varied. At each dim level, the software 24 stores a measurement of the light intensity taken by the light meter 11. This provides the software 24 with the response of the light fixture 17 to a linear drive signal.
(102) The second step of generating the linearization data is accomplished by first choosing a desired response (e.g., a desired light intensity). Then, the data for the measured response of the fixture 17 gathered in the first step is compared to the desired response. The software 24 checks the high and low end of the measured response to see if any trimming is required. The first and last points of the linearization table are set based on any trimming that is required. The remaining points are generated to compensate for any differences between the desired output and the measured output. For example, if the measured value at a particular point is higher than the desired output, then the linearization value for that point is set to output a dimming signal that is lower than what was used when the measurement was taken.
(103) For example, this setup can be used in a lab or the like to generate linearization tables for various loads 17, and these tables can be kept in a library and/or database (e.g., electronic database). The library could then be shared with installers. This method could also be used by the installer themselves by providing them with the hardware and software required to take the measurements. This would allow the installer to tune the response of the load 17 during commissioning of the system 10.
(104) Thus, the above disclosure describes another option for generating a non-linear curve for the dimming signal that provides a smooth, linear or near-linear transition in the load output (e.g., light intensity) by inputting the linearization values into the software (e.g., into processor 12 and/or master controller 14). Currently, a user can enter a single parameter (e.g., an integer from 1 to 100) that the software then inputs into a mathematical function to produce a set table of data points that define the curve. The present disclosure describes a novel alternative by which a user can create a custom table of data points that define a curve that is more detailed in its shape. The single parameter option is advantageously simple and quick and allows for adequate correction to be applied in many cases. The custom table method advantageously allows for finer control and correction of irregular load outputs.
EXAMPLE 4
Thermal Management
(105) In general, the present disclosure provides for improved dimmer control assemblies/modules having enhanced thermal management. In exemplary embodiments, the present disclosure provides for systems/methods for improving the power-handling capability of multiple dimming modules 15 mounted in an enclosure (e.g., a vertical enclosure) by enhancing the performance of the thermal management.
(106) As noted above and as depicted in
(107) As shown in
(108) In certain embodiments and as shown in
(109) As best shown in
(110) In general, the convection cooling performance of the enclosure 41 is improved (
(111) As shown in
(112) The present disclosure advantageously provides a system/method for mounting the heat generating member 27 (e.g., a switching semiconductor 27) substantially parallel or horizontally with respect to the surface of the PCB 49 facing the heat sink 47 (and facing the front of enclosure 41), with the rear side of the heat generating member 27 substantially facing the heat sink 47.
(113) In one embodiment and as shown in
(114) In general, the rear housing 53 of the assembly 15 includes at least one supporting member 55 (
(115) Fastening members 57 (e.g., screws or the like) are typically attached through the rear enclosure 53 (e.g., through each supporting member 55), and then through the printed circuit board 49, and then into the heat sink 47. When the members 57 are tightened, the rear housing 53 (e.g., each supporting member 55) presses on/against the printed circuit board 49 and holds the at least one semiconductor 27 tightly to or proximal the heat sink 47. This thereby provides for an excellent thermal transfer from the at least one semiconductor 27 to the heat sink 47. Also, the heat sink 47 can be made as large as possible, because the members 27 are not mounted perpendicular or vertically with respect to the surface of the PCB that faces the heat sink 47, which would restrict the size of the heat sink 47.
(116) With reference to
(117) Each handle member 59 typically includes at least one receiving feature 63 (e.g., an aperture or recess) that is configured to mount with respect to a securing member 61 (e.g., a pin member or protrusion) of housing 53. In exemplary embodiments, each handle member 59 also includes at least one engaging member 73 (e.g., an engaging member 73 that includes a ridged/raised and/or recessed portion) that is configured and dimensioned to releasably fasten or secure to (e.g., in a snap-fit manner) at least one corresponding engaging member 75 (e.g., an engaging member 75 that includes a ridged/raised and/or recessed portion) of housing 53, to releasably secure the handle member 59 to the housing 53 (e.g., when assembly 15 is inserted into and/or mounted with respect to enclosure 41).
(118) For example, each handle member 59 may include a top and bottom receiving feature 63 that mounts/mates with respect to a securing member 61, thereby releasably and movably mounting each handle member 59 to a side of housing 53. Mounted handle members 59 may then advantageously be rotated, pivoted, moved or swung about each side of housing 53 via securing members 61 (e.g., for mounting purposes to enclosure 41). In this regard, each handle member 59 typically includes at least one latching member 65 (e.g., two members 65 for each handle member 59), with each latching member 65 configured to latch or mount with respect to a corresponding mating member 67 of enclosure 41 to facilitate mounting assembly 15 to enclosure 41.
(119) Moreover, rear housing 53 also typically includes at least one extending member 69 (e.g., four members 69) that extend from the rear of housing 53, each extending member 69 configured to mate or mount with respect to a corresponding receiving member 71 of enclosure 41 to facilitate mounting assembly 15 to enclosure 41.
(120) Although the systems, assemblies and methods of the present disclosure have been described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the present disclosure is not limited to such exemplary embodiments and/or implementations. Rather, the systems, assemblies and methods of the present disclosure are susceptible to many implementations and applications, as will be readily apparent to persons skilled in the art from the disclosure hereof. The present disclosure expressly encompasses such modifications, enhancements and/or variations of the disclosed embodiments. Since many changes could be made in the above construction and many widely different embodiments of this disclosure could be made without departing from the scope thereof, it is intended that all matter contained in the drawings and specification shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. Additional modifications, changes, and substitutions are intended in the foregoing disclosure. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the disclosure.