Combined CGH and allele specific hybridisation method

Abstract

The invention combines the fields of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis and SNP array analysis. It relates to methods for detecting and mapping genetic abnormalities associated with various diseases. In particular the invention provides a method for simultaneously performing array CGH and SNP array analysis on a genomic DNA sample comprising contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridization conditions, comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridized to the hybridization probes of the first probe set, comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridized to the hybridization probes of the second probe set; and using the data obtained to determine the copy number of at least one locus; and at least one SNP in the genomic DNA sample.

Claims

1. A method for simultaneously performing array CGH and one or more of SNP array analysis INDEL array analysis VNTR array analysis transposon array analysis on a genomic DNA sample, comprising steps (a) to (d): (a) contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridisation conditions, wherein: (i) the first probe set, for the detection of copy number variation by array CGH, comprises a plurality of hybridisation probes substantially complementary to a plurality of target nucleotide sequences in the nucleic acid sample; and (ii) the second probe set comprises one or more pair(s) of hybridisation probes comprising a first allele probe and a second allele probe, wherein the probes are 50-70 nucleotides in length comprising a linker sequence of up to 30 nucleotides in length for one or more of a SNP position an INDEL position a VNTR position a transposon position wherein the pair(s) of probes differ in sequence such that a nucleic acid target present in the sample can differentially hybridise to the two probes depending on the nucleotide at the SNP position, the sequence at the INDEL position the number of tandem repeats at the VNTR position the presence or absence of a transposon at the transposon position wherein a probe's nucleotide at the SNP position is not its 3 terminal nucleotide; (b) comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridised to the hybridisation probes of the first probe set; (c) comparing the amount of test sample hybridized to the first allele probe and the second allele probe of the second probe set; and (d) using the data obtained in steps (b) and (c) to determine both the copy number of at least one locus and one or more of at least one SNP in the genomic DNA sample at least one INDEL in the genomic DNA sample at least one VNTR in the genomic DNA sample at least one transposon in the genomic DNA sample.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the test and reference samples present in the genomic DNA sample are each labelled with a label distinguishable from each other.

3. A method for simultaneously performing array CGH and SNP array analysis on a genomic DNA sample comprising: (a) contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridisation conditions, wherein: i. the first probe set, for the detection of copy number variation by array CGH, comprises a plurality of hybridisation probes substantially complementary to a plurality of target nucleotide sequences in the nucleic acid sample; and ii. the second probe set comprises one or more pair(s) of hybridisation probes comprising a first allele probe and a second allele probe, wherein the probes are 50-70 nucleotides in length comprising a linker sequence of up to 30 nucleotides in length for a SNP position, wherein the pair(s) of probes differ in sequence such that a nucleic acid target present in the sample can differentially hybridise to the two probes depending on the nucleotide at the SNP position wherein a probe's nucleotide at the SNP position is not its 3 terminal nucleotide; (b) comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridised to the hybridisation probes of the first probe set; (c) comparing the amount of test sample hybridized to the first allele probe and the second allele probe of the second probe set; and (d) using the data obtained in steps (b) and (c) to determine: the copy number of at least one locus; and at least one SNP in the genomic DNA sample.

4. A method for simultaneously performing array CGH and INDEL array analysis on a genomic DNA sample comprising: (a) contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridisation conditions, wherein: i. the first probe set, for the detection of copy number variation by array CGH, comprises a plurality of hybridisation probes substantially complementary to a plurality of target nucleotide sequences in the nucleic acid sample; and ii. the second probe set comprises one or more pair(s) of hybridisation probes comprising a first allele probe and a second allele probe, wherein the probes are 50-70 nucleotides in length comprising a linker sequence of up to 30 nucleotides in length for an INDEL position, wherein the pair(s) of probes differ in sequence such that a nucleic acid target present in the sample can differentially hybridise to the two probes depending on the sequence at the INDEL position (b) comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridised to the hybridisation probes of the first probe set; (c) comparing the amount of test sample hybridized to the first allele probe and the second allele probe of the second probe set; and (d) using the data obtained in steps (b) and (c) to determine: the copy number of at least one locus; and at least one INDEL in the genomic DNA sample.

5. A method for simultaneously performing array CGH and VNTR array analysis on a genomic DNA sample comprising: (a) contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridisation conditions, wherein: i. the first probe set, for the detection of copy number variation by array CGH, comprises a plurality of hybridisation probes substantially complementary to a plurality of target nucleotide sequences in the nucleic acid sample; and ii. the second probe set comprises one or more pair(s) of hybridisation probes comprising a first allele probe and a second allele probe, wherein the probes are 50-70 nucleotides in length comprising a linker sequence of up to 30 nucleotides in length for a VNTR position, wherein the pair(s) of probes differ in sequence such that a nucleic acid target present in the sample can differentially hybridise to the two probes depending on the number of tandem repeats at the VNTR position (b) comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridised to the hybridisation probes of the first probe set; (c) comparing the amount of test sample hybridized to the first allele probe and the second allele probe of the second probe set; and (d) using the data obtained in steps (b) and (c) to determine: the copy number of at least one locus; and at least one VNTR in the genomic DNA sample.

6. A method for simultaneously performing array CGH and transposon array analysis on a genomic DNA sample comprising: (a) contacting a nucleic acid array which comprises a first probe set and a second probe set with a genomic DNA sample, comprising a test and reference sample, under hybridisation conditions, wherein: i. the first probe set, for the detection of copy number variation by array CGH, comprises a plurality of hybridisation probes substantially complementary to a plurality of target nucleotide sequences in the nucleic acid sample; and ii. and the second probe set comprises one or more pair(s) of hybridisation probes comprising a first allele probe and a second allele probe, wherein the probes are 50-70 nucleotides in length comprising a linker sequence of up to 30 nucleotides in length for a transposon position, wherein the pair(s) of probes differ in sequence such that a nucleic acid target present in the sample can differentially hybridise to the two probes depending on the presence or absence of a transposon at the transposon position (b) comparing the amount of test sample and reference sample hybridised to the hybridisation probes of the first probe set; (c) comparing the amount of test sample hybridized to the first allele probe and the second allele probe of the second probe set; and (d) using the data obtained in steps (b) and (c) to determine: the copy number of at least one locus; and at least one transposon in the genomic DNA sample.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1: Overview of array CGH.

(2) FIG. 2: Signal intensity of different probes hybridised with homozygous or heterozygous samples.

(3) FIGS. 3 & 4: Diagrams showing an ideogram of the results from an Isodisomy 8 (FIG. 3) and an Isodisomy 15 (FIG. 4) sample using SNP and CGH probes. The arrows show an aberration (marked A) and the % of homozygous SNPs on a chromosome (%), which is indicated as a dark shading on a semicircular annulus.

(4) FIGS. 5 & 6: Diagrams showing an ideogram of the results from an Isodisomy 8 (FIG. 5) and an Isodisomy 15 (FIG. 6) sample using indel probes.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

(5) Use of SNP and CGH Probes to Detect UPD

(6) Array Fabrication

(7) A combined array comprising (i) 37,116 oligonucleotide SNP probes (both allele probes, triplicate) to detect 6,186 SNPs and (ii) 137,100 CGH probes was fabricated using ink jet in situ synthesis technology (see ref. 11) and was supplied by Agilent Technologies Inc.

(8) Labelling

(9) The test DNA and reference DNA were labelled using the CytoSure labelling kit (OGT catalogue number 020020). Briefly, the DNAs are digested using Alul and Rsal for 2 hours at 37 C. Following digestion and denaturation of the enzyme by heating at 65 C. for 20 mins, 10 l random primers and 10 l reaction buffer were added and the mix incubated at 94 C. for 3 minutes. Following 5 minutes on ice, 10 l of nucleotide mix was pipetted into the mix. 1 l of Cy3-dCTP was then added to the test DNA mix and 1 l of Cy5-dCTP was added to the reference DNA mix. The reaction was started with the addition of 1 l of exo-free Klenow and incubation at 37 C. for 2 hours. The enzyme was deactivated by incubation at 65 C. for minutes.

(10) The labelled DNA was cleaned up using CytoSure purification columns (OGT 020020). The columns were prepared by a spin at 2000 g for 1 minute. The mixes were each pipetted onto a column and the columns spun at 2000 g for 1 minute. The labelled DNA was collected.

(11) Hybridisation

(12) DNA was prepared for hybridisation by mixing together the labelled sample and reference DNA, then adding Cotl, Blocking buffer (Agilent Technologies Inc) and 2 high rpm hybridisation buffer (Agilent Technologies Inc). The mix was denatured at 94 C. for 3 minutes, followed by incubation at 37 C. for 30 minutes. The hybridisatio n was set up by pipetting the mix onto an Agilent backing slide (Agilent Technologies Inc) and creating a sandwich with the Microarray slide. The hybridisation was carried out using the SureHyb cassettes (Agilent Technologies Inc) and incubated at 65 C. for 40 hours at a rotation of 20 rpm in a SureHyb oven (Agilent).
Washing and Scanning

(13) The cassettes were disassembled under aCGH Wash buffer 1 (Agilent) and the slides washed with aCGH Wash buffer 1 for 5 minutes at room temperature. A second wash was carried out in aCGH Wash buffer 2 (Agilent) for 1 minute at 37 C. The slides were scanned using an Agilent Microarray scanner at 2 m resolution at 100% PMT setting following the manufacturer's recommendation.

(14) Feature Extraction and Analysis

(15) Cy3 and Cy5 intensity data from the SNP and aCGH probes was extracted from the image files using Agilent's feature extraction software.

(16) Copy number variations (CNVs) were identified from the aCGH results by examining the ratio of the signals (Cy5/Cy3) on the CGH probes. The aberrations were then identified using a combination of Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS) and calling the segment as an aberration using two thresholds set at a value of log 2(Cy5/Cy3) exceeding 0.6 in the case of deletions and below 0.3 in the case of gains.

(17) SNPs were genotyped by examining the ratio of the Cy3 signal on the two alleles' probes. The obtained signals were corrected using a correction factor for each individual SNP which had been ascertained from previous experiments with known genotyped samples. A threshold was then applied to call the SNP as homozygous (allele1, AA), heterozygous (AB) or homozygous (allele 2, BB). The thresholds used were as follows: homozygous (allele 1, AA) a ratio of Cy3 signal allele1/Cy3 signal allele 2 exceeding 0.5; heterozygous (AB) a ratio of Cy3 signal allele1/Cy3 signal allele 2 between 0.45 and 0.45; homozygous (allele 2, BB) a ratio of Cy3 signal allele 1/Cy3 signal allele 2 below 0.5).

(18) A small number of probes were been excluded by filtering if they failed to achieve a minimum signal or reproducibility between the 3 replicates.

(19) Results

(20) Detection of Isodisomy 8 UPD

(21) Column A in Table 1 shows the number of SNPs that were homozygous on each chromosome in an Isodisomy 8 sample. Column A in Table 2 shows the position of CNVs detected using the CNV probes in the same Isodisomy 8 sample.

(22) Most chromosomes have 502% of their SNPs that are homozygous. All chromosomes except for Chromosome 8 and X have between 38%-58% of their SNPs that are homozygous. 91% of SNPs on chromosome 8 are homozygous, which indicates that the arrays have detected a significant loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome 8. The CNV probes have not detected a large deletion on chromosome 8, so this indicates that the LOH is due to isodisomy 8. The X chromosome also indicates a LOH on chromosome X. This is because the sample is a male sample and therefore contains a single X chromosome. The reference used was male. FIG. 3 shows an ideogram with the results of the SNP probes and the CNV probes.

(23) Detection of Isodisomy 15 UPD

(24) Column B in Table 1 shows the number of SNPs that were homozygous on each chromosome in an Isodisomy 15 sample. Column B in Table 2 shows the position of CNVs detected using the CNV probes in the same Isodisomy 15 sample.

(25) Most chromosomes have 502% of their SNPs that are homozygous. All chromosomes except for chromosome 15 and X have between 42-58% of SNPs that are homozygous. 89% of SNPs on chromosome 15 are homozygous, indicating a significant LOH on chromosome 15. Examination of the CNV probes detected no aberrations (by examining the ratio of sample signal/reference signal). Therefore this suggests that the LOH was not due to a deletion and was due to isodisomy on chromosome 15. The other chromosome indicating LOH was chromosome X. This is because the sample is a male sample and therefore contains a single X chromosome. The reference used was male. FIG. 4 shows an ideogram with the results of the SNP probes and the CNV probes.

(26) Use of Indel and CGH Probes to Detect UPD

(27) Array Fabrication

(28) A combined array comprising oligonucleotide indel probes (both allele probes, in triplicate) to detect 490 indels and 43,323 CGH probes was fabricated using ink jet in situ synthesis as described above. Note more than one probe type may be used to detect each indel.

(29) Labelling

(30) The test DNA and reference DNA were labelled using the CytoSure labelling kit (OGT 020020). Briefly, the DNAs are denatured for 20 mins with 10 l random primers and 10 l reaction buffer at 99 C. for 20 mins. Following 5 mins on ice 10 l of nucleotide mix was pipetted into the mix. 1 l of Cy3-dCTP was then added to the test DNA mix and 1 l of Cy5-dCTP was added to the reference DNA mix. The reaction was started with the addition of 1 l of exo-free Klenow and incubation at 37 C. for 2 hours. The enzyme was deactivated by incubation at 65 C. for 10 minutes.

(31) Labelled DNA was cleaned up using CytoSure purification columns, as described above.

(32) Hybridisation, Washing and Scanning

(33) Hybridisation, washing and scanning was performed for the indel/CGH arrays in the same way as described above for the SNP/CGH arrays.

(34) Feature Extraction and Analysis

(35) Cy3 and Cy5 intensity data from the Indel and aCGH probes were extracted and normalised from the image files in the same way as described above for the SNP/CGH arrays. CNVs were identified from the aCGH results in the same way. Indels were genotyped by examining the ratio of the Cy3 signal on the two alleles' probes in the same way as described above for SNP genotyping.

(36) Results

(37) Detection of Isodisomy 8 UPD

(38) Column C in Table 1 shows the number of indels that were called homozygous on each chromosome in an known whole chromosome 8 isodisomy sample. Column C in Table 2 shows the position of CNVs detected using CNV probes in the same isodisomy 8 sample.

(39) Most chromosomes have 5010% of their indels that are homozygous. The low figure for chromosome 21 is likely due to incomplete coverage of this chromosome by indel probes. The number of homozygous indels on chromosome 8 is 91%, which indicates that the arrays have detected a significant LOH at chromosome 8. The CNV probes have not detected a large deletion on chromosome 8, so this indicates that the LOH is due to isodisomy 8. The X chromosome also indicates a LOH on chromosome X. This is because the sample is a male sample and therefore contains a single X chromosome. The reference used was male. FIG. 5 shows an ideogram with the results of the indel probes.

(40) Detection of Isodisomy 15 UPD

(41) Column D in Table 1 shows the number of indels that were homozygous on each chromosome in an Isodisomy 15 sample. Column D in Table 2 shows the position of CNVs detected using the CNV probes in the same isodisomy 15 sample.

(42) Most chromosomes have 5010% of their indels that are homozygous. All chromosomes except for chromosome 15, 18, 21 and X have between 43-68% of indels that are homozygous. 89% of chromosome 15 indels are homozygous, indicating a significant LOH on chromosome 15. The high figures for chromosomes 18 and 21 are likely due to the low number of indels on these chromosomes (24 and 12 respectively). Examination of the CNV probes on chromosome 15 detected no aberrations (by examining the ratio of sample signal/reference signal). Therefore this suggests that the LOH was not due to a deletion and was due to isodisomy on chromosome 15. The other chromosome indicating LOH was chromosome X. This is because the sample is a male sample and therefore contains a single X chromosome. The reference used was male. FIG. 6 shows an ideogram with the results of the indel probes.

(43) Use of VNTRs and CGH Probes to Detect UPD

(44) Array Fabrication

(45) One VNTR probe on chromosome 8 appeared to perform adequately in test experiments. This probe bound to the VNTR designated rs8192897 by dbSNP. A combined array comprising this VNTR probe (both alleles in triplicate) and 15,159 CGH probes was fabricated using ink jet in situ synthesis technology as described above.

(46) Labelling

(47) The test DNA and reference DNA were labelled using the CytoSure labelling kit (OGT 020020). Briefly, the DNAs are denatured for 20 mins with 10 l random primers and 10 l reaction buffer at 99 C. for 20 mins. Following 5 mins on ice 10 l of nucleotide mix was pipetted into the mix. 1 l of Cy3-dCTP was then added to the test DNA mix and 1 l of Cy5-dCTP was added to the reference DNA mix. The reaction was started with the addition of 1 l of exo-free Klenow and incubation at 37 C. for 2 hours. The enzyme was deactivated by incubation at 65 C. for 10 minutes.

(48) Subsequent steps of (i) cleaning labelled DNA, (ii) hybridisation, (iii) washing, (iv) scanning, (v) feature extraction, and (vi) data analysis were all performed in the same way as described above for the SNP and indel arrays. VNTRs were genotyped by examining the ratio of the Cy3 signal on the two alleles' probes in the same way as described above for and SNP and indel genotyping.

(49) Detection of Isodisomy 8 UPD

(50) The CGH probes indicate that there is no large deletion on chromosome 8, and the VNTR probe calls its allele as homozygous. A single CNV was detected using the CGH probes, namely a 0.79 Mb loss on chromosome 14. As there is no large CNV detected on chromosome 8 the homozygous call for the VNTR probe indicates that the combination of VNTR probes and aCGH probes can be used to identify UPD.

(51) It will be understood that the invention has been described by way of example only and modification of detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

(52) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 % of SNPs on indicated chromosome which are homozygous Chromosome A B C D 1 49% 43% 53% 50% 2 48% 47% 54% 64% 3 46% 46% 75% 64% 4 51% 45% 69% 47% 5 41% 45% 65% 59% 6 51% 47% 54% 56% 7 48% 45% 58% 68% 8 91% 49% 91% 55% 9 45% 52% 50% 58% 10 51% 46% 68% 52% 11 52% 48% 67% 63% 12 58% 53% 54% 47% 13 48% 56% 79% 59% 14 52% 42% 56% 43% 15 40% 89% 56% 89% 16 44% 48% 57% 53% 17 51% 42% 69% 54% 18 54% 51% 52% 79% 19 49% 50% 57% 57% 20 54% 45% 47% 53% 21 55% 53% 8% 83% 22 38% 58% 54% 54% X 88% 86% 100% 100%

(53) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Aberrations detected by CNV probes (exceeding 0.25 Mb) Only those CNVs exceeding 0.25 Mb are shown Chro- mo- some A B C D 1 2 Loss 0.27 Mb 0.94 Mb loss 1.5 Mb gain 3 4 1.17 Mb loss 2.23 Mb gain 5 2.02 Mb gain 1.34 Mb gain 6 0.28 Mb gain 7 0.3 Mb gain 8 1.75 Mb, 0.52 Mb, 1.16 Mb gain 9 10 11 0.48 Mb gain 0.39 Mb gain 12 2.95 Mb gain 13 14 0.34 Mb gain, 0.67 Mb gain, 0.32 Mb gain 1.49 Mb gain 15 Gain 0.75 Mb 0.31 Mb gain Gain 0.75Mb 16 17 Loss 0.47 Mb 0.36 Mb gain Loss 0.47 Mb 18 19 20 21 22 0.69 Mb loss 0.65 Mb loss, 1.75 Mb gain X

REFERENCES

(54) [1] WO93/18186. [2] WO96/17958. [3] Oostlander et al. 92004) Clin Genet 66:488-95. [4] Pinkel et al. (1998) Nature Genet 20:207-11. [5] Robinson WP (2000). Bioessays 22 (5): 452-9. [6] Kloth et al. (2007) BMC Genomics 8:53 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-53. [7] US 2007/0238106. [8] Lage et al. (2003) Genome Res 13:294-307. [9] Nakaya et al. (2007) pages 265-307 of Nucleic Acid Hybridisation ISBN 1402060394. [10] Matson (2009) Microarray Methods and Protocols. CRC Press. ISBN 1420046659. [11] Hughes et al (2001) Nature Biotechnol 19(4):342-7.