METHOD FOR SHEARING AMORPHOUS ALLOY FOILS

Abstract

A method for shearing a plurality of layered amorphous alloy foils 28 includes blanking the plurality of amorphous alloy foils 28 with a shear tool having a punch 12 and a die 14 through one descending of the punch 12. The punch 12 has a first edge E1 formed on a tip surface 12a of the punch 12 and a second edge E2 formed on a side peripheral surface 12b of the punch 12. A horizontal distance l between the first edge E1 and the side peripheral surface 12b and a vertical distance h between the second edge E2 and the tip surface 12a are each set in a range of 0.010 mm to 0.050 mm. A vertical distance h is set to 52% or less of the thickness of each amorphous alloy foil 28.

Claims

1. A method for shearing a plurality of layered amorphous alloy foils, comprising blanking the plurality of amorphous alloy foils with a shear tool having a punch and a die through one descending of the punch, wherein the punch has a first edge formed on a tip surface of the Punch and a second edge formed on a side surface of the punch, a horizontal distance between the first edge and the si de surface of the punch and a vertical distance between the second edge and the tip surface of the punch are each set in a range of 0.010 mm to 0.050 mm, and the vertical distance is set to 52% or less of a thickness of each amorphous alloy foil.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] FIG. 1 is a graph of the relationship between tensile strength and elongation as a result of a tensile test of an amorphous alloy foil.

[0037] FIG. 2 is a structural diagram illustrating a configuration of a blanking die according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0038] FIG. 3 includes a diagram illustrating a tin portion of a shear punch according to the embodiment of the present invention, and an SEM photograph of the tin port ion.

[0039] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the shape of a cutting edge of the punch used in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0040] FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating how five layers are blanked in blanking for electromagnetic steel sheets.

[0041] FIG. 6 is a table indicating the configurations of six types of punches used in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0042] FIG. 7 shows SEM photographs of the tip corners of the six types of punches before use.

[0043] FIG. 8 shows SEM photographs of the tip corners of the six types of punches after machining.

[0044] FIG. 9 shows an SEM photograph of the tip corner of punch (2) after 50,000 machining shots.

[0045] FIG. 10 is a graph of the results of measuring the shape of the cutting edge of punch (2) before machining and after 50,000 machining shots.

[0046] FIG. 11 is a graph of the results of measuring the dimensions of holes machined with the six types of punches every five layers of a stack.

[0047] FIG. 12 illustrates the change in hole size in each layer from machining start to 50,000 shots in machining after five-layered amorphous alloy foils are sheared with punch (2).

[0048] FIG. 13 shows SEM photographs of the shapes of holes machined with the six types of punches in the first layer of the five-layered amorphous alloy foils.

[0049] FIG. 14 shows enlarged SEM photographs of the vicinity of holes machined with the six types of punches in the first layer of the five-layered amorphous alloy foils.

[0050] FIG. 15 shows SEM photographs of the shapes of parts machined with the six types of punches in the first layer of the five-layered amorphous alloy foils.

[0051] FIG. 16 shows enlarged SEM photographs of the outer periphery of parts machined with six types of punches in the first layer of the five-layered amorphous alloy foils.

[0052] FIG. 17 illustrates distribution diagrams of maximum principal stresses at the start of shearing using three types of punches, calculated by finite element analysis.

[0053] FIG. 18 illustrates distribution diagrams of maximum principal stresses at the start of shearing using two types of punches, calculated by finite element analysis.

PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FOR CARING OUT THE INVENTION

[0054] An embodiment of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. The present invention is not limited to the present embodiment.

[Configuration of Blanking Die]

[0055] FIG. 2 illustrates a blanking die 10 according to the present embodiment, which include a punch 12, a die 14, a stripper plate 16, a punch plate 18, a back plate 20, springs 22, a die set 24, and guide posts 26.

[0056] An object to be machined is placed between the stripper plate 16 and the die 14.

[0057] When a pressing force is applied to the punch plate IS by a press machine (not illustrated), the punch 12 descends and blanks the object to be machined between the punch 12 and the die 14.

[0058] Meanwhile, a plate pressing force applied to the stripper plate 16 makes it possible to remove the punch 12 from the workpiece while keeping the object to be machined flat.

[0059] In FIG. 3, (a) illustrates the shape of the tip of the punch 12 having a tip surface 12a, a side peripheral surface 12b. Between the tip surface 12a and the side peripheral surface 12b, the punch 12 also has a first edge (corner) E1, an inclined surface 12c, and a second edge (corner) E2 (details will be described later). In FIG. 3, (b) is an SEM photograph of the tip portion of the punch 12.

[0060] However, the shape of the punch 12 is not limited to a cylindrical shape.

[0061] FIG. 4 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the tip portion of the punch 12, in which the horizontal distance (width) between the first edge E1 formed on the tin surface 12a of the punch 12 and the side peripheral surface 12b of the punch 12 is defined as l, the vertical distance (height) between the second edge E2 formed on the side peripheral surface 12b of the punch 12 and the tip surface 12a of the punch 12 is defined as h, and the exterior angle between the inclined surface 12c connecting the edges E1 and E2 and the tip surface 12a is defined as G.

[0062] In the figure, t represents the thickness of a workpiece.

[0063] As illustrated in FIG. 5, an object to be machined 28 (with a total thickness of 125 m) made of five-layered amorphous alloy foils 28a to 28e (each with a thickness of 25 m), which are high-strength, low-ductility metal materials, was subjected to continuous press blanking by using the blanking die 10 in FIG. 2 and the punch 12 in FIG. 3. Specifically, a plurality of punches 12 with different dimensions and h were used to compare punch damages and observe the surface condition and dimensions of the blanking products as follows.

[0064] FIG. 6 indicates the configurations of six types of punches (1) to (6).

[0065] Among these, punch (1) corresponds to a conventional edge punch, which has only one edge, in which is 90 degrees, and l and h are 0 accordingly.

[0066] The contrast, punches (2) to (6) each have a first edge and a second edge, and l and h are Set to values greater than 0.

[0067] For all the conditions, the punch diameter was set to 2.003 mm and the die diameter was set to 2.010 mm. The lubrication condition was no lubrication. A cemented carbide was used for each punch, which is a typical material for punches.

[0068] FIG. 7 shows SEM photographs of the states of punches (1) to (6) before use, which are each an enlarged view of a boxed area in (b) of FIG. 3.

[0069] FIG. 8 shows SEM photographs of the punches after machining.

[0070] It was found that punch (1) (edge punch) had a chip on the cutting edge of the punch after 100 machining shots. The same experiment was carried out three times, each in which a chip occurred for approximately the same number of machining snots.

[0071] On the other hand, no chips were observed after 1,000 machining shots with punch (2), punch (3), punch (4), and punch (6).

[0072] In contrast, with punch (5) which has relatively large l and h, the machining was discontinued after five shots because cracks appeared in the blanking hole at such a machining early stage.

[0073] To further evaluate durability, punch (2) was used, which has a cutting edge shape similar to that of the edge punch and which would be most likely to be chipped due to the load placed on the cutting edge of the punch, to perform 50,000 shots of continuous machining.

[0074] FIG. 9 shows an SEM photograph of the tip of punch (2) after 50,000 machining shots.

[0075] No chips were found, and no significant changes were observed when compared with the SEM photograph before machining.

[0076] The wear losses of the cutting edge shaped portion of punch (2) before and after machining were measure with a non-contact three-dimensional measuring machine. As a result, it was found as illustrated in FIG. 10 that the cutting edge shape dimension l before machining was 0.008 mam and after machining it was 0.013 mm, and the cutting edge shape dimension h before machining was 0.010 mm and after machining it was 0.013 mm, that is, a wear loss of only about 5 m.

[0077] The results shown above lead to that minute removal machining on the cutting edge of the punch can prevent the punch from being chipped.

[0078] Next, the hole dimensions were evaluated. FIG. 11 snows the results of measuring the dimensions of the holes in each layer machined with punches (1) to (6).

[0079] When punches (2) to (4) were used having a cutting edge shape with l and h of 0.050 mm or less, or when punch (6) was used having l of 0.050 mm, h of 0.013 mm, and 0 of 15 degrees, holes were machined in each layer with an accuracy of within 0.005 mm in hole dimensions on the basis of the hole size of punch (1) (edge punch).

[0080] FIG. 12 shows the results of measuring the hole dimensions in each layer from the machining start to 50,000 shots with punch (2) (l and h=0.010 mm).

[0081] For the first layer, the dimensions did not substantially change from the machining start until 50,000 shots. As described above, this is believed to be due to the fact that the punch was hardly worn, thereby maintaining its sharpness, and the punch diameter remained almost unchanged.

[0082] For the second and third layers, the hole dimensions did not substantially change from the first shot until 30,000 shots, but increased at the stage of 50,000 shots.

[0083] For the fourth and fifth layers, the dimensions increased as the number of machining shots increased. This is the result of the wear of the die, and is expected to be improved by increasing the hardness of the die material.

[0084] Next, the hole shapes were evaluated. FIG. 13 shows the results of SEM observation of the shapes of the holes machined with the six types of punches.

[0085] It was found that when punches (2) to (4) were used having a cutting edge shape with l and h of 0.050 mm or less, or when punch (6) was used having l of 0.050 mm, h of 0.013 mm, and of 15 degrees, the shapes of the blanking holes were free of defects including cracks, and the blanking made a shape equivalent to each punch outline shape.

[0086] FIG. 14 shows the results of SEM observation of the surface conditions in the vicinity of the holes machined with the six types of punches in the first layer.

[0087] No kink bands such as wrinkle were observed on the surface in the vicinity of the holes for punch (1) (edge punch), punch (2) (l and h=0.010 mm), and punch (6) (l=0.050 mm, h=0.013 mm, 0=15 degrees).

[0088] On the other hand, it was found that kink bands occurred when punches (3), (4), and (5) having cutting edge shapes with l and h of 0.025 mm or more were used.

[0089] The blanking parts were then evaluated. FIG. 15 shows SEM photographs of blanking parts when machined with the six types of punches in the first layer. Further, FIG. 16 shows enlarged SEM photographs of the outer periphery of the blanking parts.

[0090] It was found that when punches (1) to (4) were used having a cutting edge shape with l and h of 0.050 mm or less, and when punch (6) was used (l=0.050 mm, h=0.013 mm, 9=15 degrees), the shapes of the blanking holes were free of defects including cracks, and the blanking made a shape equivalent to each punch outline shape.

[0091] In contrast, with punch (5) having l and h of 0.125 mm, cracks occurred on the outer periphery.

[0092] A kink band is the Phenomenon that occurs when a material is bent and deformed (Non-Patent Literature 2) In shearing, it is expected that the cutting edge of a punch wears as the machining progresses, and the edge shape changes to have a roundness R, resulting in herding deformation. However, the boundary conditions for the cutting edge shape and its dimensions have not been clarified.

[0093] The boundary conditions for the occurrence or non-occurrence or kink bands depending on the cutting edge shape and its dimensions were verified by finite element analysis (FEM analysis).

[0094] FIGS. 1 and 18 show the maximum principal stresses at the start of shearing, calculated by FEM analysis, when one layer of amorphous alloy foil (with a thickness of 25 m) is machined with five types of punches.

[0095] Specifically, in FIG. 17, (a) is for punch (1) (edge punch), (b) is for punch (2) (l and h=0.010 mm), and (c) is for punch (3) (l and h=0.025 mm); in FIG. 18, (a) is for punch (6) (l=0.050 mm, h=0.013 mm, =15 degrees), and (b) is for the punch (X) first appeared here (l=0.025 mm, h=0.014 mm, =30).

[0096] Shearing has begun for punch (1), punch (2), punch (6), and punch (X), except for punch (3).

[0097] Note that, according to the definition of shear deformation, in actual machining, a large shear stress in an area connecting the cutting edge of a punch and the cutting edge of a die causes shear slippage to occur, forming a shear surface. However, shear slippage cannot be identified in PEM analysis.

[0098] Therefore, shear deformation as used herein is defined as the deformation of a workpiece along the side surface of a punch, and is the fact that the stress in an area connecting the cutting edge of the punch and the cutting edge of the die (on a line in two-dimensional FEM) is greater than that in the surrounding area.

[0099] On the other hand, with punch (3) (l and h=0.025 mm), only bending deformation occurred and no shear deformation occurred.

[0100] The results thus obtained were consistent with the occurrence or non-occurrence of kink bands on the hole surfaces illustrated in FIG. 14.

[0101] The boundary conditions for the occurrence or non-occurrence of kink bands can be considered to be the dominance of bending deformation over shear deformation.

[0102] Comparing the results for punch (3) ((c) of FIG. 17) and punch (X) ((b) of FIG. 18), it can be seen that the time (distance) from when the first edge E1 comes into contact with the material to when it comes into contact with the second edge E2 is an important factor in terms of dominant shear deformation. In other words, the shorter the time (distance) from when the first edge E1 comes into contact with the material to when it comes into contact with the second edge E2, the more dominant the shear deformation can be.

[0103] From the above-described experiments, it was found that, for a cutting edge shape height h within 52% of the material thickness as represented in the following Equation 2, shear deformation is dominant over bending deformation in the deformation mode of the machining, and no kink bands occur on the hole surface.

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}0.013\left(hof\mathrm{punch}\left(6\right)\right)0.025\left(\mathrm{thickness}\right)=0.52& \mathrm{Equation}2\end{array}$

Explanation of References

[0104] 12 Punch [0105] 16 [0106] 12a Tip surface of punch [0107] 12b Side peripheral surface of punch [0108] 12c inclined surface of punch [0109] E1 First edge [0110] E2 Second edge [0111] h Vertical distance between second edge and tip surface of punch [0112] l Horizontal distance between first edge and side peripheral surface of punch [0113] 14 Die [0114] 16 Stripper plate [0115] 18 Punch plate [0116] 20 Back plate [0117] 22 Spring [0118] 24 Die set [0119] 26 Guide post [0120] 28 Amorphous alloy foils