APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING OBJECTS WITH GESTURE CONTROLS

Abstract

An apparatus for manipulating an object includes first and second gesture controllers, each operatively connected to the object and structured and programmed such that, in a first-action active state, each can causes a first action to be carried out on the object by an appropriate first-action gesture made in the gesture controller. Only one of the first and second gesture controllers at any given time is capable of being in the first-action active state, and the first-action active state is transferable between the first and second gesture controllers upon the detecting of a first-action transfer gesture by one of said first gesture controller and said second gesture controller. Specific gesture control apparatus and methods for manipulating an object are also disclosed.

Claims

1-20. (canceled)

21. A system for manipulating an object comprising: a first gesture controller operated by a secondary user, the first gesture controller comprising a first sensor, the first sensor configured to produce a first sensing field, the first gesture controller operatively connected to the object, wherein the secondary user manipulates the object by performing a series of gestures in the first sensing field; and a second gesture controller operated by a primary user, the second gesture controller comprising a second sensor, the second sensor configured to produce a second sensing field, the second gesture controller operatively connected to the object, wherein the primary user monitors manipulation of the object by the secondary user in the first sensing field, the primary user configured to assume control of manipulating the object when the series of gestures deviates from a desired operation.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the first gesture controller is in an active state when the secondary user manipulates the object and the second gesture controller is in an inactive state when the secondary user manipulates the object.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the first gesture controller is placed in an inactive state and the second gesture controller is placed in an active state prior to the primary user assuming controller over the object.

24. The system of claim 21, wherein the second gesture controller detects an acquire gesture performed by the primary user in the second sensing field.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein responsive to the second gesture controller detecting the acquire gesture in the second sensing field, the second gesture controller places the first gesture controller in an inactive state.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein the second gesture controller detects a pass gesture performed by the primary user in the second sensing field.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein responsive to the second gesture controller detecting the pass gesture performed in the second sensing field, the second gesture controller activates the first gesture controller.

28. The system of claim 21, wherein the first gesture controller and the second gesture controller cannot simultaneously manipulate the object.

29. The system of claim 21, wherein the object is a physical object.

30. The system of claim 21, wherein the object is a virtual object.

31. A method of manipulating an object, comprising: receiving, by a computing system from a trainee gesture controller of a set of gesture controllers, an indication of a first gesture within a first sensing field of the trainee gesture controller; determining, by the computing system, an operation performable on a first object corresponding to the first gesture; based on the determining, causing, by the computing system, the operation to be performed to the first object; transferring, by the computing system, control from the trainee gesture controller to a primary gesture controller in the set of gesture controllers during training of the trainee; receiving, by the computing system, a second indication of a second gesture within a second sensing field of the primary gesture controller; determining, by the computing system, that the second gesture corresponds to a second operation to be performed on a second object; and based on the determining, causing, by the computing system, the second operation to be performed to the second object.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the first object is a virtual object and the second object is a physical object, or the first object is a physical object and the second object is a virtual object.

33. The method of claim 31, further comprising: placing, by the computing system, the trainee gesture controller in an active state before causing the operation to be performed to the first object.

34. The method of claim 33, further comprising: setting, by the computing system, the trainee gesture controller to an inactive state prior to transferring control to the primary gesture controller.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising: setting, by the computing system, the primary gesture controller in the active state before causing the second operation to be performed to the second object.

36. The method of claim 31, wherein transferring, by the computing system, control from the trainee gesture controller to the primary gesture controller in the set of gesture controllers during training of the trainee comprises: detecting an acquire gesture performed in the second sensing field.

37. The method of claim 31, wherein transferring, by the computing system, control from the trainee gesture controller to the primary gesture controller in the set of gesture controllers during training of the trainee comprises: detecting a pass gesture performed in the first sensing field.

38. The method of claim 31, further comprising: detecting, by the computing system, a third indication of a third gesture within the first sensing field of the trainee gesture controller; determining, by the computing system, that the trainee gesture controller is in an inactive state; and based on the determining, disregarding, by the computing system, the third indication.

39. The method of claim 31, further comprising: detecting, by the computing system, a third indication of a third gesture within the first sensing field of the trainee gesture controller; determining, by the computing system, that the trainee gesture controller is in an active state; and based on the determining, processing, by the computing system, the third indication.

40. The method of claim 31, wherein the first object and the second object are the same.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] FIG. 1 is a general schematic view of aspects of the process and apparatus employed in the present invention;

[0032] FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a portion of the process, showing a gesture controller detecting a particular type of gesture;

[0033] FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a portion of the process, showing the general logic followed by a controller for carrying out a particular action on the object;

[0034] FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a portion of the process, showing the general logic for a controller transferring the ability to perform a particular action by either passing the ability to perform that action to another controller or taking the ability to perform that action from another controller;

[0035] FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a portion of the process, showing the logic of a controller preventing one or more controllers from being able to perform a particular action or take the ability to perform a particular action from another controller;

[0036] FIG. 6 is a general schematic showing, together with FIG. 7, the concept of a boundary switch, whereby particular actions are taken when a gesture is made touching upon or leaving the boundaries of the sensing field of a gesture controller; and

[0037] FIG. 7 is a general schematic showing, together with FIG. 6, the concept of a boundary switch, whereby particular actions are taken when a gesture is made touching upon or leaving the boundaries of the sensing field of a gesture controller;

[0038] FIG. 8 is a general schematic showing the motion of a hand within a gesture controller to describe the creation of a user-defined home position within the sensing field of the controller; and

[0039] FIG. 9 is a general schematic showing the motion of a hand within a gesture controller to describe the creation of a user-defined home position within the sensing field of the controller.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

[0040] The present invention teaches novel ways to structure systems that employ multiple gesture controllers to manipulate an object, whether that object be virtual or physical. With reference to FIG. 1, the system of this invention for manipulating an object through the use of gesture controllers is shown and designated by the numeral 10. The system 10 includes a plurality of gesture controllers, here shown as first gesture controller 12 and second gesture controller 14. Any number of gesture controllers may be employed. The disclosure of two gesture controllers is sufficient for disclosing the concepts of this invention, but all disclosures relating to the two gesture controllers can be applicable to third and fourth etc., gesture controllers. In some embodiments, the gesture controller 12 includes a sensor 16 that produces a sensing field 18, which is represented by a box defined by various planes. Similarly, the second gesture controller 14 includes a sensor 20 defining a sensing field 22 defined by planes. Gestures made within the sensing fields cause certain actions. Although a hand is shown as the item forming the gesture, any appendage or body part or even other physical devices, machines or robots might be employed to execute the gestures necessary to cause desired actions (broadly the gesture is made by a “gesturing object”).

[0041] A “gesture” as used herein can include static and dynamic gestures. Static gestures would include making shapes or different signs with a gesturing device, often a hand or other appendage. Making an open hand, making a closed fist, making a one, two or three with the finger are all examples of static gestures. These are often useful for programmed actions. For example, make an open hand gesture could open the grip of a machine and making a closed fist could close the grip. Dynamic gestures involve motion. For example, twisting the hand might result in a rotation of an object or 3D computer model thereof, with rotation dynamically following movement of the hand.

[0042] The gesture controllers are operatively connected to each other and to one or more objects for manipulating the objects. Computers and/or other processing units, herein “processors,” interpret gestures and communicate with apparatus to cause the manipulation. The multiple gesture controllers need not be connected to a single computer but may be connected by the web, cloud, mobile device, etc. The present invention teaches that, at any given time, only one, non-conflicting command can be sent to the processors/apparatus that control particular manipulations of the object. These gesture controllers are shown simply for illustrative purposes and it should be appreciated that virtually any gesture control can be employed in the present system. There are a multitude of gesture controllers to choose from, including, without limitation, those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,106,749, 8,316,324, and U.S. 2013/0182902. Gesture controllers are well known by those of skill in the art and even by the general public, for example, with such gesture control systems as that offered by Microsoft's Kinect™ system offered with its Xbox™ gaming systems.

[0043] The first gesture controller 12 and second gesture controller 14 are operatively connected by appropriate processors and/or apparatus to operate as disclosed herein, the communication being shown at arrow 13, and, in some embodiments, the state of various components and actions and other data relevant to the system 10 and its implementation to manipulate an object can be displayed at operator interface 15 associated with the first gesture controller 12 and operator interface 17 associated with the second gesture controller. To operatively connect the first gesture controller 12 to the desired object, the sensor 16 communicates with processors and/or apparatus, with the communication being represented by arrow 24 and the processors and/or apparatus being represented by apparatus A and apparatus A′. Sensor 20 communicates with processors and/or apparatus, with the communication being represented by arrow 26, and the processors and/or apparatus being represented by apparatus A′ and apparatus A″. In FIG. 1, the Venn diagram generally representing the various processors and/or apparatus as apparatus A, A′ and A″ is employed to show that sensors 16 and 20 can communicate with shared apparatus—as at apparatus A″—and can also communicate with their own unique apparatus as with apparatus A of sensor 16 and apparatus A′ of sensor 20. The various apparatus A, A′, and A″ are operatively connected or communicate with either a virtual object t or a physical object t′, as shown at arrows 28 and 30.

[0044] With respect to the first gesture controller 12, a gesture made in the sensing field 18 of sensor 16 is detected and processed to cause a particular action either between the multiple gesture controllers 12, 16 or on the virtual object t or physical object t′. With respect to the second gesture controller 14, a gesture made in the sensing field 22 of sensor 20 is detected and processed to cause a particular action either between the multiple gesture controllers 12, 16 or on an object t, t′. Some gestures will be interpreted to cause apparatus A or apparatus A″ to effect manipulation of a virtual object t, in some embodiments, or a physical object t′, in other embodiments. The present system 10 can be employed to manipulate virtual objects t, such as icons and/or images on a computer screen, or it can be employed to physically manipulate a physical object t′. Virtual objects could include computer-drafted images and 3D models, with a 3D model being represented in FIG. 1 by way of example. The 3d model is the cube shown on the computer screen. An exemplary action that could be carried out on such a 3D model is represented by the arrow on the computer screen showing that the image could be rotated perhaps by a gesture rotating the hand in either the first gesture controller 12 or the second gesture controller 14. A gear is employed to represent physical object t′, but the physical items manipulated through the present system 10 are unlimited. The state of the art is such that gesture control will gain in popularity and increase in areas of application, and the present system is broadly applicable to any applications currently being investigated or hereafter developed.

[0045] With this general understanding of the system 10, the particular structure and programming of the plurality of gesture controllers in various embodiments is next disclosed. The disclosure focuses on the first gesture controller 12, being represented in flow charts by GC1. When necessary, the second gesture controller 14 is referenced as GC2. The flow charts also focus on particular broadly defined actions, but it will be appreciated that each gesture controller in the system can have any number of actions, each action relating to a specific gesture. In some embodiments, the present invention introduces novel safety measures by ensuring that actions shared by multiple gesture controllers can only be effected by one gesture controller at a time.

[0046] Referring now to FIG. 2, specific aspects of the first gesture controller are disclosed with the understanding that logic associated with the first gesture controller 12 (GC1) equally applies to the second gesture controller 14 (GC2). The first gesture controller 12 detects a gesture in its sensing field 18, as at step 100. Upon detection of a gesture, a processor associated with sensor 16 determines what type of gesture has been made in the sensing field 18, as shown at step 102. Determinations of this type and other determinations made per the disclosures herein are made by the processors and logic programmed into the system. Depending on the type of gesture made and other optional requirements, an appropriate desired action is carried out either between the first gesture controller 12 and one or more other gesture controllers (e.g. the second gesture controller 14) or on an object t, t′. The gestures relevant to the present invention and the manner in which they are treated by the system 10 are disclosed more fully in flow charts dealing with each particular gesture. In FIG. 2, the gestures relevant to the present invention are shown as a first-action gesture 200, a transfer gesture 300, and a pause gesture 400.

[0047] Through a first-action gesture 200, the object, whether virtual object t or physical object t′, may be manipulated in a first type of way according to a gesture made in the sensing field. The term “first” is employed only to indicate the action is a distinct manipulation of the object t, t′. The gesture controllers 12, 14 and others when employed, can be programmed to recognize any number of second, third, etc. gestures and communicate with the apparatus A, A′, A″ so as to manipulate the object in second, third, etc ways. Through the transfer gesture 300, the ability to manipulate the object in a particular way through a given gesture, for example the first-action gesture 200, is transferred from one gesture controller to another. Through the pause gesture 400, the ability to manipulate the object in a particular way through a given gesture, for example the first-action gesture 200, is disabled in one or more gesture controllers. More particulars will be apparent from further disclosures below.

[0048] Referring now to FIG. 3, the functioning of the first gesture controller 12 when detecting a first-action gesture 200 is disclosed. This disclosure applies equally well to any other gesture, broadly, second-action gestures, third-action gestures, etc., that are intended to result in manipulation of the object t, t′. Upon detection of a first-action gesture 200, a determination is made, as at 202, as to whether or not the first gesture controller 12 is in a first-action active state. If the first gesture controller is not in a first-action active state, the first gesture controller 12 cannot cause that first action to be carried out on the object t, t′ through apparatus A or apparatus A″, as represented at 100, wherein the controller simply awaits a gesture that it is able to execute. If the first gesture controller 12 is in a first-action active state, then the first gesture controller 12 can cause manipulation of the object t, t′ through its communication with apparatus A or apparatus A″, as shown at 206. In the case of a second gesture controller the manipulation can be achieved through apparatus A′ or apparatus A″. It will be appreciated that the same applies to the second gesture controller 14, and can apply to any number of gesture controllers employed. In the case of a second gesture controller the manipulation can be achieved through apparatus A′ or apparatus A″. Although focus has been drawn to a “first” action, it will be appreciated that any number of actions can be carried out through any number of gestures, with an active state particular to that gesture being necessary to result in the action being carried out. For example, a particular gesture might rotate an image on a screen or rotate a physical object, while another gesture might move an object on the screen to the right or move a physical object to the right.

[0049] In some embodiments, only one gesture controller can be in an active state for a given gesture resulting in a manipulation of the object t, t′, i.e., for any given first-action gesture, second-action gesture, third-action gesture etc. at any given time. Thus, though multiple gesture controllers might be programmed similarly to carry out various actions, it is important in some embodiments, that two different gesture controllers cannot at the same time control a particular action. For instance, it may be important to ensure that a first operator of a first gesture controller 12 cannot attempt an action that conflicts with an action taken by an operator of a second gesture controller 14. This safety feature will be found very important as gesture controlled systems become more commonly implemented. Notably, for purposes of this invention, there may be certain actions that two or more controllers can carry out without being required to be in the active state. That is, there may be some manipulations of the object that are acceptable for always being controllable by two or more gesture controllers, for purposes of this invention, the system has at least one action that can only be carried out by one gesture controller at a time, thus requiring determination of an “active state” for the gesture that causes that action, as disclosed above. In some embodiments, every action might require an active state.

[0050] Referring now to FIG. 4, the functioning of the first gesture controller 12 when detecting a transfer gesture 300 is disclosed. Some embodiments of the present invention employ a pass gesture, some embodiments employ an acquire gesture, and some embodiments employ both a pass gesture and an acquire gesture. Thus, at 302, it is first determined if the transfer gesture 300 is a pass gesture or an acquire gesture. The pass gesture is first addressed.

[0051] The pass gesture allows one to pass the active state for a given action to another controller. For example the first-action active state can be passed from a first gesture controller 12 to a second gesture controller 14. This ability might always be available, or, as shown in FIG. 4, at 304, the first gesture controller 12 might optionally have to be in a pass active state in order for a pass gesture to result in passing of the first-action active state to the second gesture controller 14 (or any other controller). If the first gesture controller 12 is not in a pass active state, the first gesture controller 12 causes no action and simply awaits detection of another gesture as at 100. If the first gesture controller 12 is in a pass active state for a first action, the first-action active state is passed to another controller, e.g., the second gesture controller 14 (GC2), as at 306. More particularly, the second gesture controller 14 is placed in the first-action active state, while, in some embodiments, the first gesture controller 12, which was just employed to pass the first-action active state to the second gesture controller 14 is placed in a first-action inactive state, wherein per FIG. 3, the first gesture controller 12 cannot cause the first action to be carried out on the object. Thus, it is possible for an operator of the first gesture controller to cause the first-action active state to be removed from the first gesture controller and passed to the second gesture controller by performing the pass gesture so as to be detected by the sensor 16. Only one operator at a time would be able to cause the first action to be carried out on the object.

[0052] The inactive state as discussed herein for various functions can be achieved in a number of ways, and the present invention is not limited to or by any particular apparatus or programming in this regard. The apparatus A, A′, A″ might remain engaged with the object t, t′, but would not be able to receive commands from the gesture controller and related processors etc. to cause motion. Other methods to achieve the inactive state include disengaging the signal from the apparatus to the object, disengaging the signal from any processors to the apparatus, and disengaging the signal from the gesture controller sensor to a processor. Combinations of these methods may also be employed. Logic relays, solid state relays or other components not shown but commonly known must be added to the gesture controllers to permit the implementation of the inactive state.

[0053] In some embodiments, as shown at 308, a determination must first be made as to whether or not the second gesture controller 14 (GC2) is permitted to and is ready to accept the first-action active state being passed to that controller. If it is not permitted, the transfer will be denied. A notice could be made to the individual attempting the pass gesture, as, for example, at operator interface 15, shown as an informative screen in FIG. 1. If the second gesture controller 14 is not ready to accept the first-action active state, the transfer could be paused to allow time for the second gesture controller 14 to be ready, with the attempt to pass and the paused state being indicated at operator interface 17. In some embodiments, an acceptance gesture must be made within the sensing field of the controller to which the active state is being passed. This is shown at 310.

[0054] The acquire gesture is now addressed. The acquire gesture allows one to acquire the active state for a given action from another gesture controller. Here, a first-action gesture is the focus. This ability might always be available, or, as shown in FIG. 4, at 314, the first gesture controller 12 might optionally have to be in an acquire gesture active state in order for an acquire gesture to result in transfer of the first-action active state from another gesture controller to the first gesture controller 12. If the first gesture controller 12 is not in an acquire gesture active state the first gesture controller 12 causes no action and simply awaits detection of another gesture as at 100. In some embodiments, if the first gesture controller 12 is in an acquire gesture active state for a first action gesture, the first-action active state is transferred from whatever gesture controller or controllers are currently first-action active. Here the transfer is from the second gesture controller 14 (GC2), as at 316. In some embodiments, the active state subject to transfer can only exist for one gesture controller for a given action, and thus the performance of the acquire gesture simply transfers the active state from whatever gesture controller is active to the gesture controller in which the acquire gesture was made. More particularly, in the example shown, the first gesture controller 12 is placed in the first-action active state, while, the second gesture controller 14 is placed in a first-action inactive state, wherein per FIG. 3, the first gesture controller 12 cannot cause the first action to be carried out on the object. Thus, it is possible for an operator of the first gesture controller to cause the first-action active state to be removed from the second gesture controller and passed to the first gesture controller by performing the acquire gesture so as to be detected by the sensor 16. In this manner, only one operator at a time would be able to cause the first action to be carried out on the object.

[0055] The acquire gesture and its implementation can have wide application in education and training, allowing a mentor at one gesture controller to monitor the manipulation of the object as carried out by one or more trainees at separate and distinct gesture controllers. The mentor can take possession of certain actions if needed to assist in education or training or for safety reasons.

[0056] Referring now to FIG. 5, the pause action 400 is disclosed. The pause gesture allows one to cause a certain action to be inactive for the system, until the action is reinstated as active on one or more controllers. For example the first-action active state can be made inactive for all gesture controllers. Explained in another way, a particular gesture can be made inoperable in the system 10 by placing all gesture controllers in an inactive state with respect to that gesture. In some embodiments, a given gesture controller might always have the ability to make a particular action inactive. In other embodiments, only a gesture controller that is in the active state for a specific gesture can successfully execute the pause gesture to place the system in the inactive state with respect to the execution of the action associated with that specific gesture. For the disclosure of this concept, the focus is on a first-action gesture and a first-action active state in FIG. 5.

[0057] As shown in FIG. 5, at 402, the first gesture controller 12 might optionally have to be in a first-action active state in order for a pause gesture to result in placing remaining controllers in a first-action inactive state. In some embodiments, if the first gesture controller 12 is not in a first-action active state, the first gesture controller 12 causes no action and simply awaits detection of another gesture as at 100. As at 404, if the first gesture controller 12 is in a first-action active state, the pause gesture results in both the first and second gesture controller 14 being placed in the first-action inactive state, whereby the first action gesture will be ineffective in both gesture controllers 12, 14. Thus, it is possible for an operator of a gesture controller to pause the ability to carry out a particular action.

[0058] In some embodiments, the paused action can be reinstated. In some embodiments, any gesture controller can be used to restart, while in other embodiments, only specifically dedicated gesture controllers can be used to restart. In specific embodiments, only the gesture controller that was employed to pause the action can be used to restart the action, i.e., the restart gesture must be made in the sensing field of the same gesture controller in which the pause gesture was made. As at 406, the first gesture controller 12 awaits a restart gesture for the first-action gesture. If the restart gesture is detected in the sensing field 18 of the first gesture controller 12, one or more gesture controllers are placed in the first-action active state, as at 408. In some embodiments, only the gesture controller in which the restart gesture is made is place in the active state.

[0059] Another embodiment of this invention provides safety measures and transfer gesture capabilities based on the sensing field dimensions. More particularly, removing a gesturing object from the boundaries of the sensing field can cause various desired actions. Herein, simply for convenience, reference will be made to a hand making gestures. With reference to FIGS. 6 and 7, it is seen that the sensing field 18 of the first gesture controller 12 is defined by the 4 boundary planes defined through points abd, points afg, points ceg, and cde. The top boundary may not be defined (or may be defined by the sensitivity of the sensor 16) whereas the bottom boundary is defined by the location of sensor 16. In this method, when the hand is removed from the sensing field 18, crossing a boundary plane, as in the condition of FIG. 7, certain actions are carried out.

[0060] In some embodiments, when a gesture is made touching upon or leaving the boundaries of the sensing field of a gesture controller the action being performed is stopped. For example if movement of the hand to the right within the sensing field causes movement of the object t, t′ to the right, the hand touching upon or leaving the boundaries of the sensing field will result in a stopping of the object movement to the right. In some such embodiments, the gesture controller is placed in the inactive state with respect to a given action when a gesture is made touching upon or leaving the boundaries of the sensing field. In some embodiments, the gesture must fully leave the boundaries of the sensing field (in the example shown, the entire hand would have to leave the boundaries). For the purposes of this disclosure, the above concept will be referred to as a “boundary switch”. Other ways may be possible to achieve a boundary switch but the concept of said switch is unique to the safe function of the invention. 100611 In some embodiments, when the pause gesture disclosed above with respect to FIG. 5 includes one of either touching upon a boundary of the sensing field or fully removing an appendage (or other gesturing object) from a sensing field of a gesture controller. In some embodiments, the pause gesture is removing an appendage (or other gesturing object) from a sensing field.

[0061] In some embodiments, the pass gesture disclosed above with respect to FIG. 4 includes one of either touching upon a boundary of the sensing field or fully removing a gesturing object from a sensing field of a gesture controller. In some embodiments, the gesture must fully leave the boundaries of the sensing field. In some embodiment, the action taken depends upon the boundary touched or crossed. In some embodiments, a gesture touching upon or leaving the sensing field at a right-side boundary, such as boundary plane ceg of FIG. 6, causes a passing of an action to a specific gesture controller. This could be a gesture controller to the right of the gesture controller in which the pass gesture is taking place, thus providing an intuitive way in which to pass an action to another gesture controller. Similarly, in some embodiments, a gesture touching upon or leaving the sensing field at a left-side boundary, such as boundary plane abd of FIG. 6, causes a passing of an action to a specific gesture controller, which could be a gesture controller to the left of the gesture controller in which the pass gesture is taking place. In other embodiments, it is simply sufficient that the operator doing the passing knows one distinct gesture controller will pass the active state when a gesture is made across one boundary of the sensing field, and another separate and distinct gesture controller will be passed the active state when a gesture is made across a different boundary of the sensing field.

[0062] In one embodiment, a removal gesture across a right boundary causes a passing of the active state to a particular gesture controller, a removal gesture across a left boundary causes passing of the active state to a separate and distinct gesture controller, and removal across the near boundary (e.g., boundary plane afg) causes the gesture-based action being performed to stop.

[0063] In other embodiments, any boundary (not just the near boundary) could be used to cause the stop a desired action being performed.

[0064] Referring now to FIG. 8, a gesture controller for facilitating the manipulation of an object t, t′ is shown by representing in different frames the movement of an operator's hand within a sensing field 18′. Because a top plan view is employed, the box-like structure of the sensing field is not seen, and is not necessary to understand the concepts disclosed. The intent is to provide the operator with the ability create a new home position for object manipulations. Although a hand is shown as the item forming the gesture, any appendage or body part or even other physical devices, machines or robots might be employed to execute the gestures necessary to cause desired actions. It will be appreciated that the sensing field area/volume is limited, and executing a gesture to perform a particular action may be facilitated by programming the gesture controllers to create a new home position upon detection of what is herein called a home gesture.

[0065] In FIG. 8, a hand gesture is employed for moving an object and defining the direction and speed at which the motion of the object occurs. A home gesture is also employed, including, by way of example only, the opening and closing a hand. It will be appreciated that any distinct gesture or gestures could be used as a home gesture. The top plan view is a simplification of the sensing field 18. Here the 2D space is shown with closed hand 40 in the sensing field 18. The figure represents only control of motion left and right (x direction) but it can be appreciated that in a sensing field the motion may be in any direction. For purpose of this example, a closed hand would be placed into the sensing field 18, with the closed hand being sensed and causing a prevention of motion control. In some embodiments, the act of placing the hand in the sensing field turns a boundary switch on to allow movement, with the closed hand gesture prohibits movement. When the hand is opened, two functions occur: 1) a “home” position within the field is defined (represented by the arrow in the first frame) and 2) motion control is allowed. In the home position no motion occurs. In the example of FIG. 8, as the open hand is moved to the left, the object would move to the left. In some embodiments, the system would be programmed such that the further that the open hand moves to the left of the field (or left of the established home position), the faster the object will move to the left. In other embodiments, a constant rate of motion might be effected regardless of the magnitude of movement from the home position. This will be based on the needs of a given application and suitability of providing or prohibiting such speed control.

[0066] It can be appreciated that movement of the hand is limited by the boundaries of the sensing area, and different movement systems might benefit from the ability to create a home position. If the object is moved from its current position only when the hand moves, the distance the object can move to the right is limited by the right boundary because the operator cannot leave the boundary and still effect movement. Thus, in FIG. 8, when the hand approaches the right boundary ceg, the hand is closed, prohibiting movement. It is then moved to the left, and the hand is reopened, creating a new home position, from which the object can now be moved further to the right. This is similar to picking up and repositioning a computer mouse when running out of room or contacting an obstacle in moving the mouse a particular direction.

[0067] Thus, in some embodiments, the present invention provides a gesture control system form manipulating an object wherein a gesture controller is operatively connected to the object and structured and programmed such that the object is moved upon movement of an gesturing object in the gesture controller relative to a home position, and wherein a new home position is established in the gesture controller when a home gesture is detected by the gesture controller.

[0068] In some embodiments, as seen in FIG. 9, both the position of the object and the speed at which it is moved is controlled by the hand gestures and movement of the hand in the sensing field in relation to a home position. With the hand at the home position, no movement occurs. Movement off of the home position causes movement of the object t, t′ in a desired direction, with the speed of the movement being dependent on the distance of the hand from the home position. In such a movement method, the hand would have to come back to the home position and then travel in an opposite direction to thereby move the object in an opposite direction. Thus, the present invention, as shown in FIG. 9, allows the operator to make a new home position by making a gesture that causes the system to prohibit movement (e.g. closed hand), thereafter repositioning the hand and making a gesture that causes the system to allow movement (open hand). Thus, in the frames of FIG. 9, a closed hand enters the sensing field 18, with the closed hand being sensed and causing a prevention of motion control. The opening of the hand in the second frame establishes a home position (at the X shown in the second frame) and, in the home position no motion occurs. As the open hand is moved to the right, the object would move to the right. In some embodiments, the object would be moved at a constant rate despite the positioning of the hand relative to the home position, with the positioning of the hand functioning to define the direction of motion only. In other embodiments, the distance the hand moves from the home position causes a change in the speed at which the object is moved. In either embodiment, the direction and distance the object moves are dependent upon the amount of time the hand remains off the home position. To change direction, the hand could return to the left and, once it approaches and passes the home position and moves to the left thereof, the object would likewise slow and then stop its rightward motion and switch direction and move to the left. Of course, left and right motion are exemplary only, and any type of motion could be achieved through this concept. To avoid requiring a return to the home position to establish a different direction of motion and to otherwise allow more nuanced control of the object, a new home position can be created at any time through an appropriate home gesture. Here, the operator, after moving the object rightward by moving the open hand to the right and holding for the desired time, stops motion by forming a fist and then creates a new home position near the right boundary ceg by opening the hand. Thereafter, movement to the left can be effected without regard to the home position initially established.

[0069] Aspects of the invention relating to transferring the active state between multiple controllers has broad application in any gesture control system employing multiple controllers. Aspects of motion as disclosed with respect to the boundary switch and the creation of new home positions for motion have application in gesture controls systems employing one or more gesture controllers.

[0070] In particular embodiments, one or more aspects of the present invention are implemented in a microscopy assembly having a microscope and a specimen on translation stage. A translation stage serves to move the specimen under the microscope to change the portion of the specimen that is imaged thereby. The movement can be in x, y and/or z directions. In some embodiments, the specimen and/or portions of the microscope can be manipulated to image the desired portion. The microscope could be movable relative to the specimen or a combination of movement of the microscope and movement of the specimen could be practiced. General aspects of using gesture controls to in microscopy are shown in patent DE 102012220195.

[0071] In light of the foregoing, it should be appreciated that the present invention significantly advances the art of gesture control systems. While particular embodiments of the invention have been disclosed in detail herein, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to or by and specific example and as variations on the invention herein will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the invention shall be appreciated from the claims that follow.