MINIMALLY-INVASIVE LOW STRAIN ANNULOPLASTY RING
20230125047 · 2023-04-20
Inventors
- Brian S. Conklin (Orange, CA, US)
- Louis A. Campbell (Santa Ana, CA, US)
- Salvador Marquez (Foothill Ranch, CA, US)
- James R. Yamada (Irvine, CA, US)
- Rodolfo Rodriguez (San Luis Obispo, CA, US)
- Da-Yu Chang (Irvine, CA, US)
- Steven M. Ford (Laguna Beach, CA, US)
Cpc classification
A61F2230/0013
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2220/0016
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2/2445
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2210/0014
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A minimally-invasive annuloplasty ring for implant at a mitral annulus. The annuloplasty ring has an inner core member with a C-shaped plan view that generally defines an oval with a major axis and a minor axis, and is symmetric about the minor axis. A posterior portion of the core member bisected by the minor axis has a thicker radial dimension than a pair of free end regions terminating on an anterior side of the core member. The radial thickness smoothly transitions between the posterior portion and the end regions. The inner core member may be covered with a fabric, and is a superelastic metal so that it can be straightened out and delivered through an access tube. The curvatures and thicknesses around the core member are selected so that the strain experienced when straightened does not exceed 7-8%.
Claims
1. An annuloplasty ring, comprising: an inner core member surrounded by an outer covering, the core member being formed of a superelastic material and defining in plan view a curved relaxed open D-shape implant shape having a posterior portion connected by left and right sides to an anterior portion including end regions terminating in two free ends spaced across a gap, the core member having a radial thickness t.sub.1 within the posterior portion and a smaller radial thickness t.sub.2 within the end regions, and transition segments between the end regions and the posterior portion within which the radial thickness gradually transitions from the radial thickness t.sub.1 of the posterior portion to the smaller radial thickness t.sub.2 of the end regions, wherein the core member has a saddle shape with the posterior portion and anterior portion rise upward from the sides, wherein the core member may be substantially straightened without exceeding a yield strain of the superelastic material.
2. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the superelastic material is Nitinol.
3. The annuloplasty ring of claim 2, wherein the yield strain is between about 7-8%.
4. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the radial thickness in each region in cooperation with a respective curvature results in a strain in that region when the ring is substantially straightened of between 4-7%.
5. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the core member has a first radius R of curvature within the posterior portion and a smaller second radius r of curvature within the two end regions.
6. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the posterior portion rises upward higher than the anterior portion.
7. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the core member has a radial cross-section in the shape of a solid square with rounded corners.
8. The annuloplasty ring of claim 8, wherein the superelastic material is Nitinol.
9. An annuloplasty ring, comprising: an inner core member surrounded by an outer covering, the core member being formed of a superelastic material and defining in plan view a curved relaxed open D-shape implant shape having a posterior portion connected by left and right sides to an anterior portion including end regions terminating in two free ends spaced across a gap, the core member having a first radius R of curvature within the posterior portion and a smaller second radius r of curvature within the two end regions, wherein the core member has a saddle shape with the posterior portion and anterior portion rise upward from the sides, wherein the core member may be substantially straightened without exceeding a yield strain of the superelastic material.
10. The annuloplasty ring of claim 9, wherein the superelastic material is Nitinol.
11. The annuloplasty ring of claim 10, wherein the yield strain is between about 7-8%.
12. The annuloplasty ring of claim 1, wherein the core member has a radial thickness t.sub.1 within the posterior portion and a smaller radial thickness t.sub.2 within the end regions.
13. The annuloplasty ring of claim 12, wherein the radial thickness in each region in cooperation with a respective curvature results in a strain in that region when the ring is substantially straightened of between 4-7%.
14. The annuloplasty ring of claim 9, wherein the posterior portion rises upward higher than the anterior portion.
15. The annuloplasty ring of claim 9, wherein the core member has a radial cross-section in the shape of a solid square with rounded corners.
16. The annuloplasty ring of claim 15, wherein the superelastic material is Nitinol.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0023] The present invention provides an annuloplasty ring suitable for implant at a native mitral or tricuspid annulus in need of repair. It should be understood that although a mitral annuloplasty ring is shown and described, a number of features are equally applicable to a tricuspid annuloplasty ring; in particular the desirable curvatures around the ring which limit the maximum strain created in an inner core member when straightened.
[0024] A first embodiment of the present application is illustrated in
[0025] A fully assembled annuloplasty ring 28, described in more detail below with reference to
[0026] As seen in
[0027] At this point, it is instructive to define coordinate axes for the various directions used to define the ring shape. The term “axis,” “flow axis,” “vertical axis” or “central axis” in reference to the illustrated ring, and other non-circular or non-planar rings, refers to a line generally perpendicular to the ring that passes through the area centroid of the ring when viewed in plan view (i.e.,
[0028] With reference again to
[0029] With reference to
[0030]
[0031] The core member 20 is desirably made from a superelastic material such as, but not limited to, Nitinol (NiTi) or similar superelastic alloys. Superelasticity, sometimes called pseudoelasticity, is an elastic (reversible) response to an applied stress, caused by a phase transformation between the austenitic and martensitic phases of a crystal. More generally, superelasticity permits a material to bend beyond what would conventionally be expected from the particular class of material, such as a metal alloy.
[0032] The superelastic core member 20 is designed in such a way that deforming it from the shape shown to a completely linear shape does not exceed the yield strain for Nitinol, which is between approximately 7-8%. Namely, the core member 20 as shown in
[0033] One can use the following equations for the relationship between the radius at the neutral axis of a curved beam and the maximum strain it will experience when being straightened:
[0034] where e is the strain and 1.sub.0 and 1.sub.1 are the initial and final length of the region which is experiencing strain. In the case of a curved member with an initial radius of curvature R at the neutral axis which subtends an angle of θ in radians and has a thickness of t, the starting and ending lengths, 1.sub.0 and 1.sub.1, for when the curved member is straightened can be expressed as follows:
[0035] Substituting equations 2 and 3 into equation 1 results in an equation for the maximum strain when a curved beam is straightened:
[0036] which simplifies to
[0037] Thus, the following equations pertain to the posterior portion 22 and thin regions 54 between the sides 40 and the free ends 24a, 24b of the core member 20, respectively:
[0038] The strain e.sub.3 within the transition segments 56 between the posterior portion 22 and the sides 40 necessarily changes due to the varying thickness, but is also below the yield strain for Nitinol of between approximately 7-8%. In general, the curvature R of the posterior portion 22 is fairly large and therefore the thickness t.sub.1 can also be large, whereas where the curvature r is much tighter as in the end regions 54, the wall thickness t.sub.2 can be thinner. Another way to characterize this design is that the ring has matched radii and radial thicknesses around its periphery which in cooperation result in a strain below the yield strain of the material when the ring is straightened out for MIS delivery.
[0039] For an exemplary 24 mm ring, as traditionally measured across the major axis 50, the radius R of curvature within arc θ (posterior portion 22) is about 0.482 inches (12.24 mm). Assuming the maximum strain to be 7% and solving equation {5} for the thickness t.sub.1 results in the maximum thickness t.sub.1 of 0.063 inches (1.60 mm). Likewise, for the region 54 within arc β (adjacent the free ends 24a, 24b) the radius of curvature is about 0.220 inches (5.59 mm) which results in a maximum calculated thickness of 0.029 inches (0.74 mm).
[0040] Still another way to define the beneficial aspects of the exemplary core member 20 is that the in-plane radial thickness at any location depends on the local radius of curvature. As mentioned, looking at
[0041] However, at the same time, the core member 20 must have a minimum bulk for the purpose of providing rigidity to the implanted annuloplasty ring to ensure proper correction or remodeling of the annulus. That is, a purely flexible core member with a small radial thickness, such as a wire, will experience very low strain when straightened, but also will not have the rigidity to remodel the annulus - it will be too floppy. There is thus a trade-off between providing flexibility so as to enable straightening, while also being semi-rigid for remodeling. The more rigid the core member the lower the strain or flexing after implant from the heart beating. Of course, surgeons have varying preferences in this regard, but a semi-rigid ring which can be bent for delivery and then assumes a desired annulus remodeling shape with minimal implanted flexing is considered optimum by most.
[0042] So, in practice the local thickness/radius combination preferably results in a strain which is less than but close to the yield strain. For Nitinol rings where the material yield strain is between 6-7%, therefore, the strain from straightening out the core member is preferably between 3-6%, more preferably between 4-6%, and most preferably between 5-6%. Similarly, for Nitinol rings where the material yield strain is between 7-8%, the strain from straightening out the core member is preferably between 4-7%, more preferably between 5-7%, and most preferably between 6-7%. The following provide examples beyond a 7% strain for a 24 mm ring. For a 5% max strain: t.sub.1 = 0.046”, t.sub.2 = 0.021 ”. For a 3% max strain: t.sub.1= 0.028”, t.sub.2 = 0.013”. Again, if the intention is to make the implant as stiff as possible (i.e. lowest strain during heart beating) then it would be desirable to use the highest permissible strain during delivery, which is around 6.5-7% for the Nitinol typically used in medical implants.
[0043] Further, the same equations and calculations apply to the curvatures in the Z-direction that define the saddle shape to ensure that it could be flexed flat in the Z-direction into a straight configuration for delivery. For instance, the radius of the curvature of the upwardly-bowed posterior portion 22, as best seen in
[0044] The core member 20 of the MIS annuloplasty ring 28 disclosed herein could be manufactured a number of different ways, including laser cut or stamped from sheet, formed from wire, cut from a tube, etc. Any of these methods could involve post-processing such as machining, grinding, and shape setting to achieve the final desired configuration, both in terms of thickness in the Z-direction as well as the saddle shape.
[0045] As will be clear below, the open nature of the core member 20, and ring 28 formed thereby, permits a surgeon to open the structure up into an elongated (straightened) strand for delivery through a small tube such as a catheter or cannula, as will be described below. The annuloplasty ring 28 is advanced into the heart and expelled from the access tube into position at the mitral annulus MA (or tricuspid annulus, as contemplated). The natural elasticity of the superelastic material of the core member 20 enables the ring to transition from the elongated delivery shape to the relaxed ring shape and therefore conform to the target annulus.
[0046]
[0047] The mitral annuloplasty ring 28 preferably includes two commissure markings 60 that help the surgeon register the ring at the appropriate location around the mitral annulus MA. A third marking 62 may be provided at the midpoint of the posterior portion 22 of the ring. The markings may be lines of colored thread, whereas the outer covering 26 is typically a white fabric. Ink, toner from a laser printing system or even a yarn knit into the cloth can also be used for marker, or the marker may be a radiopaque clip or stitch visible from outside the body under fluoroscopy.
[0048] The free ends 24a, 24b of the exemplary core member 20 extend beyond the commissure markings 60, into the area of the tough, fibrous trigones RT, LT, as seen in
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052] While the foregoing is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Moreover, it will be obvious that certain other modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.