Method of ejecting ink droplets having variable droplet volumes
09579889 ยท 2017-02-28
Assignee
Inventors
- Vincent Patrick Lawlor (Dublin, IE)
- Gregory John McAvoy (Dublin, IE)
- Ronan Padraig Sean O'Reilly (Dublin, IE)
- Emma Rose Kerr (Dublin, IE)
- Misty Bagnat (Dublin, IE)
Cpc classification
B41J2/04585
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B41J2/04593
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of ejecting an ink droplet from an inkjet nozzle device having an actuator and a meniscus pinned across a nozzle opening. The method includes the steps of: delivering a sub-ejection pulse to the actuator for perturbing the meniscus from a quiescent state; and subsequently delivering an ejection pulse to the actuator at an instant when the meniscus is perturbed from its quiescent state, the ejection pulse ejecting the ink droplet from the nozzle opening. A time period between a trailing edge of the sub-ejection pulse and a leading edge of the ejection pulse controls a droplet volume of the ejected ink droplet.
Claims
1. A method of ejecting an ink droplet from an inkjet nozzle device having an actuator and a meniscus pinned across a nozzle opening, said method comprising the steps of: delivering a sub-ejection pulse to the actuator for perturbing the meniscus from a quiescent state; and subsequently delivering an ejection pulse to the actuator at an instant when the meniscus is perturbed from its quiescent state, the ejection pulse ejecting the ink droplet from the nozzle opening, wherein: a time period between a trailing edge of the sub-ejection pulse and a leading edge of the ejection pulse controls a droplet volume of the ejected ink droplet; a relatively shorter time period produces a relatively larger droplet volume; and a relatively longer time period produces a relatively smaller droplet volume.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sub-ejection pulse and the ejection pulse together define a pulse package, each pulse package having a predetermined time period and an associated droplet volume.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein each pulse package consists of a single sub-ejection pulse and a single ejection pulse.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the meniscus is a concave meniscus in its quiescent state.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the sub-ejection pulse inverts the concave meniscus into a convex meniscus, the convex meniscus providing relatively higher droplet volumes.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the sub-ejection pulse increases the curvature of the concave meniscus, the increased curvature providing relatively lower droplet volumes.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein relatively larger and relatively smaller droplet volumes are generated by a same amount of energy delivered to the actuator.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein a time period in the range of 0.1 to 2 microseconds produces a larger droplet volume relative to a corresponding ejection pulse without a preceding sub-ejection pulse.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein a time period in the range of 2.5 to 8 microseconds produces a smaller droplet volume relative to a corresponding ejection pulse without a preceding sub-ejection pulse.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the time period is varied to eject ink droplets having different droplet volumes.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the time period is varied for different print jobs.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein an optimum droplet volume is determined for a print job using one or more input parameters.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the input parameters comprise one or more of: ink type, media type, user-specified print quality requirements, print speed, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, and a position of the nozzle device in the printhead.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the droplet volume is further dependent on one or more of: a pulsewidth of the sub-ejection pulse, an amplitude of the sub-ejection pulse, a pulsewidth of the ejection pulse, an amplitude of the ejection pulse, ink viscosity, ink surface tension, and a backpressure of ink in the printhead.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the inkjet nozzle device comprises a nozzle chamber having the nozzle opening defined in a roof thereof and a moving roof portion for ejection of ink from the nozzle opening, whereby actuation of said device moves said moving roof portion towards a floor of the nozzle chamber.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the moving roof portion has one or more of the following characteristics at the instant of delivering the ejection pulse: a non-zero displacement; zero or near-zero velocity; and zero or near-zero acceleration.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the moving roof portion comprises the actuator.
18. The method of clam 17, wherein the actuator is a thermal bend actuator comprising: an upper thermoelastic beam connected to a pair of electrical contacts; and a lower passive beam mechanically cooperating with said thermoelastic beam, such that when a current is passed through the thermoelastic beam, the thermoelastic beam heats and expands relative to the passive beam resulting in bending of the thermal bend actuator.
19. A method of ejecting an ink droplet from an inkjet nozzle device having an actuator and a meniscus pinned across a nozzle opening, said method comprising the steps of: delivering a sub-ejection pulse to the actuator for perturbing the meniscus from a quiescent state; and subsequently delivering an ejection pulse to the actuator at an instant when the meniscus is perturbed from its quiescent state, the ejection pulse ejecting the ink droplet from the nozzle opening, wherein: a time period between a trailing edge of the sub-ejection pulse and a leading edge of the ejection pulse controls a droplet volume of the ejected ink droplet, and wherein the time period is varied for different print jobs.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein an optimum droplet volume is determined for a print job using one or more input parameters.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the input parameters comprise one or more of: ink type, media type, user-specified print quality requirements, print speed, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, and a position of the nozzle device in the printhead.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the droplet volume is further dependent on one or more of: a pulsewidth of the sub-ejection pulse, an amplitude of the sub-ejection pulse, a pulsewidth of the ejection pulse, an amplitude of the ejection pulse, ink viscosity, ink surface tension, and a backpressure of ink in the printhead.
23. A method of ejecting an ink droplet from an inkjet nozzle device having a moving roof portion controlled by an actuator for ejection of ink from a nozzle opening having a meniscus, said method comprising the steps of: delivering a sub-ejection pulse to the actuator for perturbing the meniscus from a quiescent state; and subsequently delivering an ejection pulse to the actuator at an instant when the meniscus is perturbed from its quiescent state, the ejection pulse ejecting the ink droplet from the nozzle opening, wherein: a time period between a trailing edge of the sub-ejection pulse and a leading edge of the ejection pulse controls a droplet volume of the ejected ink droplet; and the moving roof portion has one or more of the following characteristics at the instant of delivering the ejection pulse: a non-zero displacement; zero or near-zero velocity; and zero or near-zero acceleration.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(13)
(14) Referring to
(15) The moving portion 108 comprises a thermal bend actuator having a pair of cantilever beams in the form of an upper thermoelastic beam 114 fused or bonded to a lower passive beam 116. The lower passive beam 116 defines the extent of the moving portion 108 of the roof. The upper thermoelastic beam 114 comprises a pair of arms 114A and 114B which extend longitudinally from respective electrode contacts 118A and 118B. The arms 114A and 114B are connected at their distal ends by a connecting member 115. The connecting member 115 may comprise a conductive pad 117 (e.g. copper, titanium etc), which facilitates electrical conduction around this join region. Hence, the active beam 114 defines a bent or tortuous conduction path between the electrode contacts 118A and 118B.
(16) The electrode contacts 118A and 118B are positioned adjacent each other at one end of the inkjet nozzle device 100 and are connected via respective connector posts 119 to a metal CMOS layer 120 of the substrate 102. The CMOS layer 120 contains the requisite drive circuitry for actuation of the bend actuator.
(17) The passive beam 116 is typically comprised of any electrically and thermally-insulating material, such as silicon oxide, silicon nitride etc. In some embodiments, the passive beam 116 may be bi-layered, having a relatively thin thermally-insulating silicon oxide layer sandwiched between the thermoelastic beam 114 and a relatively thick silicon nitride layer. Inkjet nozzle devices having a bi-layered passive beam and corresponding advantages thereof are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,079,668, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The thermoelastic beam 114 may be comprised of any suitable thermoelastic material, such as an aluminium alloy (e.g. titanium-aluminium, vanadium-aluminium etc.). As explained in the U.S. Pat. No. 7,984,973, aluminium alloys are a preferred material, because they combine the advantageous properties of high thermal expansion, low density and high Young's modulus.
(18) Referring to
(19) The roof 104, which defines part of a rigid nozzle plate for the printhead, is covered with a coating layer 126. As shown in
(20) When it is required to eject a droplet of ink from the nozzle chamber 122, a current flows through the thermoelastic beam 114 between the electrode contacts 118. The thermoelastic beam 114 is rapidly heated by the current and expands. Since the thermoelastic beam 114 is bonded to the passive beam 116, the expansion is constrained and causes the thermoelastic beam 114, and hence the moving portion 108, to bend downwards towards the substrate 102 relative to the stationary portion 110. This movement, in turn, causes ejection of ink from the nozzle opening 112 by a rapid increase of pressure inside the nozzle chamber 122. When current stops flowing, the moving portion 108 is allowed to return to its quiescent position, shown in
(21) In the nozzle design shown in
(22) The inkjet nozzle device 100, as described above, typically ejects ink droplets having droplet volumes in the range of 0.8-1.2 pL using a single ejection pulse, depending on fixed parameters, such as nozzle diameter, chamber height, ink surface tension, ink viscosity, ink backpressure etc.
(23)
(24) At time zero, the actuator is in a quiescent state having zero displacement and velocity at the moment of receiving the ejection pulse. This quiescent state is shown schematically in the inkjet nozzle device 100 of
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29) Moreover, the total amount of energy delivered to the device is about the same for each droplet ejection, irrespective of whether relatively larger or smaller droplets are ejected. Consistent droplet ejection energies are particularly advantageous, because this simplifies the design of a power supply for delivering power the printhead.
(30) The method described herein may be used to vary relative droplet volumes. However, absolute droplet volumes may be controlled by usual parameters known the art, such as ink chamber geometry, nozzle opening diameter, ink viscosity and surface tension, ink backpressure, energy of ejection pulse etc.
(31) By way of completeness,
(32) Other parameters may be used to determine an optimum pulse package for a particular print job. For example, media type, ink type, print speed, ambient conditions etc. may be used to determine an optimum pulse package for each inkjet nozzle device 100 in the printhead 250. By way of example, a high viscosity ink, such as a UV-curable ink, will typically require longer time periods between the sub-ejection and ejection pulses than a low viscosity ink.
(33) In practice, optimum pulse packages for a printhead will usually be determined empirically by measuring droplet weights for different time delays. Once time delays for maximum and minimum droplet weights have been determined, then optimum pulse packages for different print jobs may be selected accordingly.
(34) It will, of course, be appreciated that the present invention has been described by way of example only and that modifications of detail may be made within the scope of the invention, which is defined in the accompanying claims.