Elevator
09573792 ยท 2017-02-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Esko Aulanko (Kerava, FI)
- Jorma Mustalahti (Hyvinkaa, FI)
- Pekka Rantanen (Hyvinkaa, FI)
- Simo Makimattila (Espoo, FI)
Cpc classification
Y10T74/18848
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B66B7/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B11/009
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B15/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
D07B2201/2006
TEXTILES; PAPER
B66B11/008
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
D07B2201/2006
TEXTILES; PAPER
International classification
B66B7/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B11/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B15/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B11/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
D07B1/16
TEXTILES; PAPER
Abstract
An elevator may include: a hoisting machine; a set of hoisting ropes; a traction sheave that comprises a plurality of grooves; and diverting pulleys. The hoisting machine may engage the set of ropes via the traction sheave. Each groove may have an opening for receiving an individual rope. Each rope may include steel wires of circular, non-circular, or circular and non-circular cross-section, twisted together to form strands. The strands of each rope may be twisted together to form the respective rope. A thickness of each rope may be greater than or equal to about 2.5 mm and less than or equal to about 8 mm. An average of wire thicknesses of the steel wires may be greater than or equal to 0.1 mm and less than or equal to 0.4 mm. The strength of the steel wires may be greater than 2,300 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 3,000 N/mm.sup.2.
Claims
1. An elevator without a machine room, comprising: a hoisting machine; a set of hoisting ropes; a traction sheave that comprises a plurality of grooves; and diverting pulleys; wherein the hoisting machine engages the set of hoisting ropes via the traction sheave, wherein each of the grooves has an opening for receiving an individual hoisting rope from among the hoisting ropes, wherein each respective hoisting rope of the hoisting ropes comprises steel wires of circular, non-circular, or circular and non-circular cross-section, twisted together to form strands, wherein the strands of each respective hoisting rope are twisted together to form the respective hoisting rope, wherein a thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to about 2.5 mm and less than or equal to about 8 mm, and wherein an average of wire thicknesses of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to 0.1 mm and less than or equal to 0.4 mm, and wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,300 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 3,000 N/mm.sup.2.
2. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,300 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 2,700 N/mm.sup.2.
3. The elevator of claim 1, wherein an outer diameter of the traction sheave is at most about 250 mm.
4. The elevator of claim 1, wherein at least part of a space between strands and wires in the hoisting ropes is filled with at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other medium of substantially non-fluid nature.
5. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the hoisting ropes have a surface made of at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other non-metallic material.
6. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the traction sheave is coated, at least in the grooves, with a nonmetallic material.
7. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the traction sheave is made of a non-metallic material, at least in a rim part including the grooves.
8. The elevator of claim 1, wherein a ratio of a traction sheave diameter (D) to a hoisting rope thickness (d) is lower than 40:1.
9. The elevator of claim 1, where at least part of a space between strands or wires in the hoisting ropes is filled with at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other medium of substantially non-fluid nature.
10. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,700 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 3,000 N/mm.sup.2.
11. The elevator of claim 1, wherein each of the hoisting ropes individually contacts one of the grooves.
12. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to about 2.5 mm and less than or equal to about 5 mm.
13. The elevator of claim 1, wherein the thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is about 4 mm, about 6 mm, or about 8 mm.
14. An elevator with a machine room, comprising: a hoisting machine; a set of hoisting ropes; a traction sheave that comprises a plurality of grooves; and diverting pulleys; wherein the hoisting machine engages the set of hoisting ropes via the traction sheave, wherein each of the grooves has an opening for receiving an individual hoisting rope from among the hoisting ropes, wherein each respective hoisting rope of the hoisting ropes comprises steel wires of circular, non-circular, or circular and non-circular cross-section, twisted together to form strands, wherein the strands of each respective hoisting rope are twisted together to form the respective hoisting rope, wherein a thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to about 2.5 mm and less than or equal to about 8 mm, and wherein an average of wire thicknesses of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to 0.1 mm and less than or equal to 0.4 mm, and wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,300 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 3,000 N/mm.sup.2.
15. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,300 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 2,700 N/mm.sup.2.
16. The elevator of claim 14, wherein an outer diameter of the traction sheave is at most about 250 mm.
17. The elevator of claim 14, wherein at least part of a space between strands and wires in the hoisting ropes is filled with at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other medium of substantially non-fluid nature.
18. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the hoisting ropes have a surface made of at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other non-metallic material.
19. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the traction sheave is coated, at least in the grooves, with a nonmetallic material.
20. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the traction sheave is made of a non-metallic material, at least in a rim part including the grooves.
21. The elevator of claim 14, wherein a ratio of a traction sheave diameter (D) to a hoisting rope thickness (d) is lower than 40:1.
22. The elevator of claim 14, where at least part of a space between strands or wires in the hoisting ropes is filled with at least one of rubber, urethane, and some other medium of substantially non-fluid nature.
23. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the strength of the steel wires of the hoisting ropes is greater than 2,700 N/mm.sup.2 and less than 3,000 N/mm.sup.2.
24. The elevator of claim 14, wherein each of the hoisting ropes individually contacts one of the grooves.
25. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is greater than or equal to about 2.5 mm and less than or equal to about 5 mm.
26. The elevator of claim 14, wherein the thickness of each of the hoisting ropes is about 4 mm, about 6 mm, or about 8 mm.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the following, the invention will be described in detail by the aid of a few examples of its embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, wherein
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
(15)
(16) The elevator also may have a machine room, for example, machine room 28, as shown in
(17) The drive machine 6 placed in the elevator shaft is preferably of a flat construction, in other words, the machine has a small depth as compared with its width and/or height, or at least the machine is slim enough to be accommodated between the elevator car and a wall of the elevator shaft. The machine may also be placed differently, e.g. by disposing the slim machine partly or completely between an assumed extension of the elevator car and a shaft wall. The elevator shaft can be provided with equipment required for the supply of power to the motor driving the traction sheave 7 as well as equipment for elevator control, both of which can be placed in a common instrument panel 8 or mounted separately from each other or integrated partly or wholly with the drive machine 6. The drive machine may be of a geared or gearless type. A preferable solution is a gearless machine comprising a permanent magnet motor. The drive machine may be fixed to a wall of the elevator shaft, to the ceiling, to a guide rail or guide rails or to some other structure, such as a beam or frame. In the case of an elevator with machine below, a further possibility is to mount the machine on the bottom of the elevator shaft.
(18)
(19) The elevator car 101 and the counterweight 102 move in the elevator shaft along elevator and counterweight guide rails 110,111 guiding them.
(20) In
(21) As discussed above, some or all of the diverting pulleys may be larger in diameter than the traction sheave 7, as shown, for example, in
(22)
(23) The weight of the elevator machine and its supporting elements used to hold the machine in place in the elevator shaft is at most about of the nominal load. If the machine is exclusively or almost exclusively supported by one or more elevator and/or counterweight guide rails, then the total weight of the machine and its supporting elements may be less than about or even less than of the nominal load. Nominal load of an elevator means a load defined for elevators of a given size. The supporting elements of the elevator machine may include e.g. a beam, carriage or suspension bracket used to support or suspend the machine on/from a wall structure or ceiling of the elevator shaft or on the elevator or counterweight guide rails, or clamps used to hold the machine fastened to the sides of the elevator guide rails. It will be easy to achieve an elevator in which the machine deadweight without supporting elements is below 1/7 of the nominal load or even about 1/10 of the nominal load or still less. Basically, the ratio of machine weight to nominal load is given for a conventional elevator in which the counterweight has a weight substantially equal to the weight of an empty car plus half the nominal load. As an example of machine weight in an elevator of a given nominal weight when the fairly common 2:1 suspension ratio is used with a nominal load of 630 kg, the combined weight of the machine and its supporting elements may be only 75 kg when the traction sheave diameter is 160 mm and hoisting ropes having a diameter of 4 mm are used, in other words, the total weight of the machine and its supporting elements is about of the nominal load of the elevator. As another example, using the same 2:1 suspension ratio, the same 160 mm traction sheave diameter and the same 4 mm hoisting rope diameter, in an elevator for a nominal load of about 1000 kg, the total weight of the machine and its supporting elements is about 150 kg, so in this case the machine and its supporting elements have a total weight equaling about of the nominal load. As a third example, let us consider an elevator designed for a nominal load of 1600 kg. In this case, when the suspension ratio is 2:1, the traction sheave diameter 240 mm and the hoisting rope diameter 6 mm, the total weight of the machine and its supporting elements will be about 300 kg, i.e. about 1/7 of the nominal load. By varying the hoisting rope suspension arrangements, it is possible to reach a still lower total weight of the machine and its supporting elements. For example, when a 4:1 suspension ratio, a 160 mm traction sheave diameter and a 4 mm hoisting rope diameter are used in an elevator designed for a nominal load of 500 kg, a total weight of machine and its supporting elements of about 50 kg will be achieved. In this case, the total weight of the machine and its supporting elements is as small as only about 1/10 of the nominal load. When the traction sheave size is substantially reduced and a higher suspension ratio introduced, the motor torque output requirement falls to a fraction of the level required in the starting situation. For example, if a 4:1 suspension ratio is used instead of 2:1 suspension and if a traction sheave having a diameter of 160 mm is used instead of one with a diameter of 400 mm, then, if the increased losses are ignored, the torque requirement falls to one fifth. Thus, the size of the machine is also really substantially reduced.
(24)
(25) By making the coating thinner at the sides of the groove than at its bottom, the strain imposed by the rope on the bottom of the rope groove while sinking into the groove is avoided or at least reduced. As the pressure cannot be discharged laterally but is directed by the combined effect of the shape of the basic groove 320 and the thickness variation of the coating 302 to support the rope in the rope groove 301, lower maximum surface pressures acting on the rope and the coating are also achieved. One method of making a grooved coating 302 like this is to fill the round-bottomed basic groove 320 with coating material and then form a half-round rope groove 301 in this coating material in the basic groove. The shape of the rope grooves is well supported and the load-bearing surface layer under the rope provides a better resistance against lateral propagation of the compression stress produced by the ropes. The lateral spreading or rather adjustment of the coating caused by the pressure is promoted by thickness and elasticity of the coating and reduced by hardness and eventual reinforcements of the coating. The coating thickness on the bottom of the rope groove can be made large, even as large as half the rope thickness, in which case a hard and inelastic coating is needed. On the other hand, if a coating thickness corresponding to only about one tenth of the rope thickness is used, then the coating material may be clearly softer. An elevator for eight persons could be implemented using a coating thickness at the bottom of the groove equal to about one fifth of the rope thickness if the ropes and the rope load are chosen appropriately. The coating thickness should equal at least 2-3 times the depth of the rope surface texture formed by the surface wires of the rope. Such a very thin coating, having a thickness even less than the thickness of the surface wire of the rope, will not necessarily endure the strain imposed on it. In practice, the coating must have a thickness larger than this minimum thickness because the coating will also have to receive rope surface variations rougher than the surface texture. Such a rougher area is formed e.g. where the level differences between rope strands are larger than those between wires. In practice, a suitable minimum coating thickness is about 1-3 times the surface wire thickness. In the case of the ropes normally used in elevators, which have been designed for a contact with a metallic rope groove and which have a thickness of 8-10 mm, this thickness definition leads to a coating at least about 1 mm thick. Since a coating on the traction sheave, which causes more rope wear than the other rope pulleys of the elevator, will reduce rope wear and therefore also the need to provide the rope with thick surface wires, the rope can be made smoother. Rope smoothness can naturally be improved by coating the rope with a material suited for this purpose, such as e.g. polyurethane or equivalent. The use of thin wires allows the rope itself to be made thinner, because thin steel wires can be manufactured from a stronger material than thicker wires. For instance, using 0.2 mm wires, a 4 mm thick elevator hoisting rope of a fairly good construction can be produced. Depending on the thickness of the hoisting rope used and/or on other reasons, the wires in the steel wire rope may preferably have a thickness between 0.15 mm and 0.5 mm, in which range there are readily available steel wires with good strength properties in which even an individual wire has a sufficient wear resistance and a sufficiently low susceptibility to damage. In the above, ropes made of round steel wires have been discussed. Applying the same principles, the ropes can be wholly or partly twisted from non-round profiled wires. In this case, the cross-sectional areas of the wires are preferably substantially the same as for round wires, i.e. in the range of 0.015 mm.sup.2-0.2 mm.sup.2. Using wires in this thickness range, it will be easy to produce steel wire ropes having a wire strength above about 2000 N/mm.sup.2 and a wire cross-section of 0.015 mm.sup.2-0.2 mm.sup.2 and comprising a large cross-sectional area of steel material in relation to the cross-sectional area of the rope, as is achieved e.g. by using the Warrington construction. For the implementation of the invention, particularly well suited are ropes having a wire strength in the range of 2300 N/m.sup.2-2700 N/mm.sup.2, because such ropes have a very large bearing capacity in relation to rope thickness while the high hardness of the strong wires involves no substantial difficulties in the use of the rope in elevators. A traction sheave coating well suited for such a rope is already clearly below 1 mm thick. However, the coating should be thick enough to ensure that it will not be very easily scratched away or pierced e.g. by an occasional sand grain or similar particle having got between the rope groove and the hoisting rope. Thus, a desirable minimum coating thickness, even when thin-wire hoisting ropes are used, would be about 0.5 . . . 1 mm. For hoisting ropes having small surface wires and an otherwise relatively smooth surface, a coating having a thickness of the form A+B cos a is well suited. However, such a coating is also applicable to ropes whose surface strands meet the rope groove at a distance from each other, because if the coating material is sufficiently hard, each strand meeting the rope groove is in a way separately supported and the supporting force is the same and/or as desired. In the formula A+B cos a, A and B are constants so that A+B is the coating thickness at the bottom of the rope groove 301 and the angle a is the angular distance from the bottom of the rope groove as measured from the center of curvature of the rope groove cross-section. Constant A is larger than or equal to zero, and constant B is always larger than zero. The thickness of the coating growing thinner towards the edges can also be defined in other ways besides using the formula A+B cos a so that the elasticity decreases towards the edges of the rope groove. The elasticity in the central part of the rope groove can also be increased by making an undercut rope groove and/or by adding to the coating on the bottom of the rope groove a portion of different material of special elasticity, where the elasticity has been increased, in addition to increasing the material thickness, by the use of a material that is softer than the rest of the coating.
(26)
(27) The hoisting ropes 3 may have, for example, a load-bearing part twisted from steel wires of circular cross-section (e.g.,
(28)
(29) It is obvious to the person skilled in the art that different embodiments of the invention are not limited to the examples described above, but that they may be varied within the scope of the following claims. For instance, the number of times the hoisting ropes are passed between the upper part of the elevator shaft and the counterweight or elevator car is not a very decisive question as regards the basic advantages of the invention, although it is possible to achieve some additional advantages by using multiple rope passages. In general, embodiments should be so implemented that the ropes go to the elevator car at most as many times as to the counterweight. It is also obvious that the hoisting ropes need not necessarily be passed under the car. In accordance with the examples described above, a skilled person can vary the embodiment of the invention as the traction sheaves and rope pulleys, instead of being coated metal pulleys, may also be uncoated metal pulleys or uncoated pulleys made of some other material suited to the purpose.
(30) It is further obvious to the person skilled in the art that the metallic traction sheaves and rope pulleys used in the invention, which are coated with a non-metallic material at least in the area of their grooves, may be implemented using a coating material consisting of e.g. rubber, polyurethane or some other material suited to the purpose.
(31) It is also obvious to the person skilled in the art that the elevator car, the counterweight and the machine unit may be laid out in the cross-section of the elevator shaft in a manner differing from the lay-out described in the examples. Such a different lay-out might be e.g. one in which the machine and the counterweight are located behind the car as seen from the shaft door and the ropes are passed under the car diagonally relative to the bottom of the car. Passing the ropes under the car in a diagonal or otherwise oblique direction relative to the form of the bottom provides an advantage when the suspension of the car on the ropes is to be made symmetrical relative to the center of mass of the elevator in other types of suspension lay-out as well.
(32) It is further obvious to the person skilled in the art that the equipment required for the supply of power to the motor and the equipment needed for elevator control can be placed elsewhere than in connection with the machine unit, e.g. in a separate instrument panel. It is likewise obvious to the skilled person that an elevator applying the invention may be equipped differently from the examples described above.
(33) It is also obvious to the skilled person that, instead of using ropes with a filler as illustrated in
(34) As average of the wire thicknesses, a statistical average or mean valuee.g. the geometrical or arithmetical mean valueof the thicknesses of all wires of a hoisting rope is understood. For statistical average or mean value, the standard deviation, Gauss distribution, medium error square or deviation square method etc. could be used. Often wires of the same thickness are used in a rope, in which case the average thickness describes the thickness of each wire of the rope. If wires of different thicknesses should be used, for the same reason the maximum wire thickness in the rope should preferably not exceed the factor 4, more preferably 3 or most preferably 2 of the average wire thickness.