Implant-Specific Medical Titanium Alloy Achieving Immediate Implant Placement and Preparation Method for Implant-Specific Medical Titanium Alloy
20230066250 · 2023-03-02
Inventors
- Ling REN (Shenyang, CN)
- Ke YANG (Shenyang, CN)
- Shuyuan ZHANG (Shenyang, CN)
- Hai WANG (Shenyang, CN)
- Sharafadeen Kunle KOLAWOLE (Shenyang, CN)
- Ziqing SUN (Shenyang, CN)
Cpc classification
International classification
C22F1/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present invention relates to the field of medical titanium alloy materials, and in particular, to a narrow-diameter high-strength implant-specific medical titanium alloy achieving immediate implant placement and a preparation method for the implant-specific medical titanium alloy. The medical titanium alloy is prepared from the following chemical components (by weight percentage), 14%-17% of Zr, 3.0%-10% of Cu, and the balance of Ti. The preparation method for the medical titanium alloy comprises: after cogging and forging and before rolling, performing heat preservation for 0.5-6 h at the temperature of 900-1200° C., and water cooling to the room temperature; and rolling at the temperature of 720-850° C., a strain rate being larger than 0.1 s-1, and a barstock obtained after rolling being used for subsequent implant processing. According to the narrow-diameter high-strength implant-specific medical titanium alloy achieving immediate implant placement provided in the present invention, immediate implant placement can be achieved without any surface treatment, and a firm combination of the implant and a bone tissue is achieved. According to the preparation method for the medical titanium alloy provided in the present invention, the implant having a narrow diameter (3.0-3.5 mm) can be prepared and is high in strength, and the purpose of firm implanting on a narrow teethridge missing a tooth is achieved.
Claims
1. An implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement, characterized in that: by weight percentage, a chemical composition of the titanium alloy is: Zr: 14-17; Cu: 3.0-10; the remainder is Ti.
2. The implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement according to claim 1, characterized in that: a copper content is, by weight percentage, Cu: 6-8.
3. A preparation method of the implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement according to claim 1, characterized in that: before rolling and after billet forging, insulating at 900-1200° C. environment for 0.5-6 h, and water cooling to room temperature.
4. The preparation method of the implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement according to claim 3, characterized in that: rolling at 720-850° C. environment with a strain rate greater than 0.1 s.sup.−1 to obtain a bar materials after rolling for subsequent implant processing.
5. The preparation method of the implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement according to claim 3, characterized in that: no surface treatment of the titanium alloy is required.
6. The preparation method of the implant-specific medical titanium alloy for realizing immediate implant placement according to claim 3, characterized in that: the titanium alloy is a narrow-diameter implant with a diameter range of 3.0-3.5 mm.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[0024] The present invention is further described by means of the following embodiments. These embodiments are merely descriptions of the best embodiments of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
[0025] Embodiments: Embodiments 1-6 are medical material titanium alloys containing Cu element, and their chemical compositions are shown in Table 1. The controlled smelting is carried out according to the chemical composition range of the present invention, Also, the heat treatment and thermal processing technology are carried out as follows:
[0026] First heat treatment: after billet forging and before rolling into a bar, carryout heat preservation at 900-1200° C. environment for 0.5-6 h, and water cool to room temperature.
[0027] The second hot working: rolling at 720-850° C. environment, a strain rate is greater than 0.1 s.sup.−1, and the bar material obtained after rolling is used for subsequent implant processing.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES
[0028] Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are conventional medical titanium alloy TiZr, Comparative Examples 3 and 4 are medical titanium alloys containing a small amount of Cu element, and Comparative Examples 5 and 6 are medical titanium alloys containing a large amount of Cu element. Their chemical compositions are shown in the Table 1. Wherein, Comparative Examples 1, 3, and 5 have undergone the hot working heat treatment process provided by the present invention; Comparative Examples 2, 4, and 6 have undergone conventional hot working heat treatment processes: after billet forging, rolling at 700˜850° C. into bar materials.
1. Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Ability
[0029] All the bar materials (diameter 4 mm) of the comparative examples and the embodiment of the present invention are processed into threaded implants with reference to the current clinical mainstream Straumann SLA 3.3*10 mm NN SP implant (Straumann company, Switzerland), but no surface treatment is performed. The dimensional design drawings of the implant and the carrier are shown in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 The chemical composition of the materials of the embodiments and comparative examples (wt. %) Materials Zr Cu Ti Embodiment 1 15.7 3.9 Remainder Embodiment 2 16.1 5.3 Remainder Embodiment 3 15.5 6.5 Remainder Embodiment 4 15.8 7.3 Remainder Embodiment 5 15.9 8.2 Remainder Embodiment 6 15.9 9.5 Remainder Comparative 15.5 — Remainder Example 1 Comparative 16.1 — Remainder Example 2 Comparative 15.7 0.6 Remainder Example 3 Comparative 15.2 1.2 Remainder Example 4 Comparative 16.3 15.5 Remainder Example 5 Comparative 15.9 16.1 Remainder Example 6
[0030] After extraction of bilateral mandibular premolars, implant surgery is performed after 3 months of natural healing. A standard twist drill was used to prepare a hole at the implant placement site, with a diameter of 3.3 mm and a depth of 10 mm. The above processed implants of the comparative examples and the embodiments are respectively implanted into the edentulous area of the mandible on both sides of the Beagles. The implantation depth is 10 mm, the implant shoulder is flush with the alveolar ridge top bone surface, and then the screw is closed and tightened, the mucosa is pulled up, and the suture is closed tightly. After the operation, start feeding with normal soft food. One week after implantation, the animals are sacrificed for sampling, and hard tissues are sliced and stained with Masson's tricolor staining kit (BASO, Zhuhai, China). Stain the slices with Weigert iron hematoxylin (Weigert iron hematoxylin A, B solution in equal proportions) for 5-10 minutes, and then rinse slightly with running water; differentiate with 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol, and rinse with running water for several minutes. Dye with Ponceau S acid red solution for 5-10 minutes, wash with running water; treat with phosphomolybdic acid solution for 5 minutes, directly use aniline blue dye solution without washing for 5 minutes; treat with 1% glacial acetic acid for 1 minute, dehydrate with 95% alcohol for multiple times; dehydrate with anhydrous alcohol, and mount with neutral gum. The stained sections are observed and photographed with a LeicaS (Typ 007) camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and an inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany), which are shown in
2. Mechanical Performance Evaluation
[0031] The mechanical properties of the bar materials of the embodiments and comparative examples are examined. The HTV-1000 hardness tester is used to measure the Vickers hardness of the annealed sample. The sample surface is polished before the experiment. The sample size is a sheet with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. The test load force is 9.8 N and the pressure duration is 15 s. By measuring the diagonal length of the indentation, the hardness value is automatically calculated by the computer hardness analysis software. The final hardness value is taken as the average value of fifteen points, and three parallel samples are selected for each group of samples. The Instron 8872 tensile testing machine is used to test the room temperature tensile mechanical properties of the samples after heat treatment, and the tensile rate is 0.5 mm/min. Before the experiment, a lathe is used to process the sample into a standard tensile specimen with a thread diameter of 10 mm, a gauge length of 5 mm, and a gauge length of 30 mm. Three parallel samples are taken from each group of the samples after heat treatment, and the mechanical properties indicators obtained in the experiment are tensile strength, yield strength and elongation. The results are shown in Table 2.
3. Cytotoxicity Assessment
[0032] The biosafety performance test is carried out on the materials of the embodiments and comparative examples. MTS reagent is used for cytotoxicity experiment. This reagent can be converted into water-soluble formazan compounds by dehydrogenases in living cells, but dead cells have no such function. The cells in the culture flask are digested with trypsin to prepare a cell suspension with a concentration of 5×10.sup.4/ml, which is added to a 96-well plate, and 100 μl is added to each well. After culturing for 8 hours in a 5% CO.sub.2 incubator, aspirate the original medium, wash gently with PBS twice, add 100 μl of material extract, and set a negative control group (add complete medium) and a positive control group (complete medium containing 10% DMSO). Put the 96-well plate back into the CO.sub.2 incubator and continue culturing for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. At the preset time point, take out the 96-well plate, add 10 μl MTS (Signalway Antibody, USA), incubate for 4 h in the incubator, measure the absorbance value at the 490 nm wavelength of the microplate reader, and calculate the relative growth rate (Relative growth rate, RGR), RGR=(experimental group OD value/culture medium OD value)×100%, and then classify according to the 5-level toxicity evaluation standard (0.1 level meets the requirements of biomedical materials). The results are shown in Table 2.
[0033] It can be seen from the results in Table 2 that when the content of Cu element in the medical titanium alloy is low (Comparative Examples 1-4), the BIC value is low, all lower than 40%. According to literature and clinical reports, only when the BIC is greater than 45%, the implant is considered to be well integrated and the implantation is successful. Although the Cu content in Comparative Examples 5 and 6 is relatively high, too much Cu will affect the biocompatibility of the material, that is, the cytotoxicity rating is only Grade 3, which leads to a decrease in the osseointegration rate, both of which are lower than 30%. Only when the weight percentage of Cu element is between 3-10, the BIC exceeds 45%, and it has the highest BIC in the preferred range of Cu element, which proves that it has excellent osseointegration ability and realizes immediate implant placement.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 5 Related Performance Test Results of Materials of Embodiments and Comparative Examples bone- Cytotoxicity implant Mechanical Performance Grading (≤ contact σ.sub.b σ.sub.0.2 δ Ψ HV grade 2 is Materials (BIC) % MPa MPa % % 0.5 pass) Embodiment 1 53 735 643 35 40 330 1 Embodiment 2 60 865 755 30 35 345 1 Embodiment 3 80 956 853 25 30 360 0 Embodiment 4 82 1012 910 25 30 365 0 Embodiment 5 62 1105 980 15 20 370 1 Embodiment 6 59 1125 1005 10 12 375 1 Comparative 32 510 420 35 42 280 0 Example 1 Comparative 29 450 345 30 38 290 0 Example 2 Comparative 40 720 658 30 35 315 1 Example 3 Comparative 39 530 475 28 25 300 1 Example 4 Comparative 30 985 858 10 15 355 3 Example 5 Comparative 28 855 750 8 10 345 3 Example 6
[0034] It can be seen from the results in Table 2 that when Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are respectively subjected to the hot working and heat treatment process provided by the present invention and conventional method, the mechanical properties of Comparative Example 1 are better than those of Comparative Example 2. At the same time, for Comparative Examples 3 and 4, which are also low-content Cu elements, and Comparative Examples 5 and 6, which are also high-content Cu elements, after respectively undergoing the hot working and heat treatment process provided by the present invention and conventional method, the mechanical properties of Comparative Examples 3 and 5 are better than those of Comparative Examples 4 and 6. Finally, all the embodiments have better mechanical properties after undergoing the hot working and heat treatment process provided by the present invention, and the strength is improved on the basis of maintaining excellent plasticity, which is significantly higher than the comparative examples.
[0035] It can be seen from the above analysis that when the content of Cu element is in the preferred range, after the hot working and heat treatment process provided by the present invention, the implant-specific medical titanium alloy provided by the present invention not only achieves the purpose of immediate implant placement, but also has a higher strength and a better biocompatibility.
[0036] Details not provided by the present invention is known technologies.
[0037] The above-mentioned embodiments are only to illustrate the technical concept and characteristics of the present invention, and the purpose is to enable those familiar with the technology to understand the content of the present invention and implement them accordingly, and cannot limit the protection scope of the present invention. All equivalent changes or modifications made according to the spirit of the present invention should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention.