Gas gun launcher
09567108 ยท 2017-02-14
Assignee
Inventors
- John William Hunter (Escondido, CA, US)
- Harry E. Cartland (Carmel, CA, US)
- Philip James Sluder (El Cajon, CA, US)
- Richard Edward Twogood (Dublin, CA, US)
Cpc classification
F42B10/663
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41A1/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F42B15/01
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41B11/68
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41F1/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F41A1/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41F3/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41B11/68
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41F1/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A gas gun launcher has a pump tube and a launch tube with a first end of the launch tube slidably inserted into a second end of the pump tube. The pump tube may hold a heat exchanger to heat a light gas used to launch a vehicle. A sliding seal can be employed to manage recoil and to retain the gas within the launch tube and the pump tube. A fast-closing muffler at the second end of the launch tube can conserve the light gas utilized for launching a vehicle, enabling the light gas to be recycled. A launch tube alignment system is preferably automatic, ensuring the survival of the launch vehicle.
Claims
1. A gas gun launcher for launching a vehicle into space, which comprises: a launch tube having a first end and a second end; a pump tube defining a chamber, wherein the chamber has a size sufficient to contain a total volume of heated light gas used to launch the vehicle from the gas gun launcher; a high-speed opening valve at the first end of said launch tube and in fluid communication with a heat exchanger to receive heated light gas from the heat exchanger; a closure at the second end of the launch tube, the closure including a fast-closing valve configured so that the light gas drives the fast-closing valve to a shut position at launch; and a light gas recycling system for recycling the light gas from the launch tube.
2. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1 wherein the fast-closing valve comprises a door for sealingly closing the gas gun launcher, and wherein the door is rotatably connected so that the door is closed by the light gas behind the vehicle during launch.
3. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1 wherein the fast-closing valve comprises a ball with a diameter larger than an inner diameter of the valve and positioned so that the light gas behind the vehicle pushes the ball to sealingly close the inner diameter during launch.
4. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1, wherein the launch tube is mounted statically to ground.
5. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1 wherein the pump tube is movable and has a sliding seal between the pump tube and the launch tube.
6. A gas gun launcher according to claim 5 wherein the pump tube is attached to a shock absorber.
7. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1, wherein the high-speed opening valve is configured to control admission of the light gas to the first end of the launch tube as the valve opens so that the light gas is initially below a peak pressure at the vehicle as the vehicle moves from the first end of the launch tube and toward the second end of the launch tube, said valve sealing against a seat.
8. A gas gun launcher according to claim 7 wherein the high-speed opening valve has a brake configured to provide a retaining force against the high-speed opening valve to hold the high-speed opening valve closed against pressure applied to the high-speed opening valve by the light gas.
9. A gas gun launcher according to claim 7 wherein the high-speed opening valve has a shape and a mass such that the light gas is initially below said peak pressure at the vehicle as the vehicle moves from the first end of the launch tube and toward the second end of the launch tube.
10. A gas gun launcher according to claim 9 wherein said high-speed opening valve's shape and mass are such that the light gas is at a peak pressure at the vehicle once said vehicle reaches a distance beyond about a third of a length of the launch tube during launch.
11. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1 wherein the light gas consists essentially of hydrogen.
12. A gas gun launcher according to claim 1 and further comprising an automatic launch tube alignment system configured to straighten the launch tube.
13. A gas gun launcher for launching a vehicle into space, which comprises: a launch tube having a first end and a second end; a movable pump tube defining a chamber, wherein the chamber has a size sufficient to contain a total volume of heated light gas used to launch the vehicle from the gas gun launcher, the movable pump tube being movable relative to the launch tube; a high-speed opening valve at the first end of said launch tube and in fluid communication with a heat exchanger to receive heated light gas from a heat exchanger; and a recoil absorber for at least one end of the launch tube.
14. A gas gun launcher according to claim 13 wherein the recoil absorber enables relative movement of the movable pump tube at the first end of the launch tube.
15. A gas gun launcher according to claim 14 wherein the movable pump tube is connected to the first end of the launch tube by a slidable seal.
16. A gas gun launcher according to claim 14 wherein the recoil absorber further comprises a movable muffler at the second end of the launch tube.
17. A gas gun launcher according to claim 13 wherein the recoil absorber comprises a movable muffler at the second end of the launch tube.
18. A gas gun launcher according to claim 17 wherein the movable muffler is connected to the second end of the launch tube by a slidable seal.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
(19) A pump tube shown in
(20) The OBL preferentially uses the neutral buoyancy tubes submerged in the ocean to minimize gravitational loads and hence tube distortion. The LBL has the option to use composites as well and in this case benefits from the reduced weight and distortion, and potentially lower cost. The pump tube also has an insulating liner that reduces hydrogen heat transfer to the walls. The pump tube contains a heat exchanger that uses the heat of combustion of natural gas or other hydrocarbons and air to heat hydrogen.
(21) The pump tube has buoyancy compensators, in the case of the OBL, that also serve as recoil fins as in
(22) The pump tube has a gas manifold shown in
(23) The pump tube conditions and stores the high temperature (approximately 1700 K typical), high pressure (approximately 100 MPa typical) light gas prior to its release from the pump tube's chamber through a fast-opening valve and into the launch tube, accelerating the launch vehicle to its desired muzzle velocity (6 km s.sup.1 typical for hydrogen) over the length of the launch tube. As one of ordinary skill recognizes from e.g.
(24) A reusable fast-opening valve is located in the pump tube near the sliding seal in the launch tube as shown in
(25) The valve accelerates prior to opening and the flow area increases from zero to full area in a short time thereafter. By tailoring both the shape and mass of the cylindrical diaphragm as well as the empty volume behind the vehicle, one can insure that peak pressure at the vehicle base occurs when the vehicle is at a desired location. (About of the way along the pump tube is much better in terms of reducing peak g-load.)
(26) The cylindrical fast valve diaphragm is illustrated in
(27) The launch tube is constructed similarly to the pump tube, however, it has a replaceable refractory liner. Straightness is at a premium here since the vehicle is traveling at high speeds. Waviness in the OBL and the LBL launch tubes is reduced by means of an automatic launch tube alignment mechanism, which senses misalignment. The OBL waviness will then be corrected by differential tension applied to the cables shown in
(28) Both the OBL and LBL can use similar sensors to determine misalignment and mechanisms to correct misalignment. Ludeca offers a commercial laser/optical device to determine misalignment. (See www.ludeca.com/prod_borealign-bore-alignment.php.) The inventors' preferred method has three precision tubes rigidly attached externally to the launch tube. The Ludeca bore alignment devices are located inside the tubes and sense misalignment as described in Ludeca's brochure. Alternatively, the devices can travel inside the launch tube prior to the launch.
(29) Once misalignment is determined the OBL can apply tension to the tensioning cables shown in
(30) The LBL alignment forces are applied in a different fashion from the OBL due to the simple piers attached to the earth (
(31) In both the OBL and LBL cases, alignment sensing and adjustment will be carried out remotely with the help of commercial control system equipment, e.g. a Labview/Trio motion control system or a standard Programmable Logic Controller. Preferably, a human confirms final alignment prior to each launch.
(32) Circular cable support members shown in
(33) The male locating step and female locating step in
(34) The composite construction muffler in
(35) Maneuvering thrusters shown in
(36) There is preferably a Maintenance Platform (MP) as shown in
(37) There is, also preferably, a smaller Muffler Maintenance Platform (MMP) shown in
(38) As a theoretical example, a launcher could have a pump tube with an internal diameter of 4 meters and a total length of 100 meters. It would be joined to a launch tube 1,000 meters long with an ID of 2.5 meters. The muffler at the end of the launch tube would be 5 meters in internal diameter and 50 meters long. The heated hydrogen just prior to the shot would be at 15 ksi and 1,700 Kelvin. The launch vehicle would weigh about 3 tons and deliver 1,000 lbs of payload to a depot in LEO at equatorial inclination.
(39) The launch vehicle, illustrated in
(40) The aeroshell preferably has a power law shape of the form r=AX.sup.P where the exponent is 0.75, although other viable shapes such as bi-conic exist. The acceptable range of exponent is, though, between 0.25 and 1.5, inclusive. The length to diameter ratio (L/D) is between 3 and 20, exclusive of the endpoints. An L/D of 5 has about 4 times the drag of an L/D of 10. The reason for excluding L/Ds greater than or equal to 20 is the fragility of long skinny objects at extreme speeds in air. Conversely, an L/D of 1 will be rugged but have unacceptably high drag.
(41) The aeroshell covers the housing of the vehicle without, of course, blocking the rocket motor nozzle, and is composed of carbon-phenolic or similar material and has a wall thickness appropriate to the in-bore stresses it will experience. (Carbon-phenolic is a name known by one of ordinary skill in the field of thermal protection for aircraft and reentry bodies.) In-bore stresses are a result of base pressure, velocity, barrel straightness, and vehicle/sabot material. Those of ordinary skill in the art who design vehicles, e.g., designers for the light gas gun at Arnold Engineering and Development Center in Tennessee, use computer Finite Element Analysis (FEA) predictions to design hypersonic gun-launched vehicles based on those parameters. In addition to using computer programs to determine wall thickness, it is desirable to take data from a large number of test launches to validate and augment the FEA results.
(42) The fore-body is preferably capped with an ablative aerospike as illustrated in
(43) Q* refers to the heat of ablation of a material under extremely high heating rates consistent with orbital speeds. Carbon-carbon is known to those of ordinary skill in the field of thermal protection for re-entry vehicles. Other materials such as Teflon and oak are among acceptable ablative thermal protection system materials. Carbon-carbon has a Q* in excess of 5,000 Btu lb.sup.1 or 12 MJ kg.sup.1. Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) and PICA-X are recent acceptable coatings used by NASA and SpaceX.
(44) Aerospike dimensions can be computed by the use of ablation codes such as Coyote and ABRES (ASCC86) at Sandia National Laboratory (SNL). SNL's Aeroscience and Compressible Fluid Mechanics Department has run aerothermal shape change codes for the inventors in the past to predict the changing shape of a vehicle nose during high speed atmospheric egress. Aeroshell design is a straightforward yet challenging piece of engineering. There are probably several hundred individuals of ordinary skill in the field at SNL, LLNL, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NASA, and assorted companies like SpaceX, Boeing and Lockheed capable of performing the work. There will be some testing required in addition to the simulations.
(45) The aft section of the vehicle preferably has a flared base in order to move the center of pressure rearward, further behind the center of mass, to increase stability. An ACS nozzle, shown in
(46) An aeroshell ejection charge, illustrated in
(47) When the vehicle is powered by a solid propellant, a cargo compartment will exist. This is also an option when the vehicle uses liquid or hybrid propellant, e.g. when the payload is a satellite.
(48) More commonly, however, if liquid propellant powers the vehicle, and liquid propellant is the cargo, the vehicle contains an oxidizer tank and a fuel tank, as illustrated in
(49) A standard liquid propellant is most preferred, a hybrid fuel is preferred, and solid fuel is third in terms of priority of propellants, although priorities may change depending on the specific application. Hybrid rockets use a fuel such as acrylic, polyethylene or polybutadiene and then flow a gaseous oxidizer like oxygen or nitrous oxide over the fuel surface. They are safer than ordinary solid propellant motors yet still throttleable via the oxidizer. Of course when liquid propellant is utilized, there must be one or more valves to control the fuel and oxidizer, and in a hybrid rocket there must be a valve to control the oxidizer.
(50) Primary propulsion of the vehicle is possible with a standard nozzle or multiple standard nozzles. Preferably though, in the case of a liquid propulsion system, a rocket plug nozzle is utilized, as described below and as illustrated in
(51) For the case of liquid propellants for either the primary motor or the attitude control system motor, a manifold and igniter exist unless the propellant is hypergolic, in which case an igniter is unnecessary. In the case of the rocket plug nozzle, the manifold is located near the plug nozzle and regulates and distributes the propellant which is pressurized preferably from centripetal force created by spinning the vehicle.
(52) The ACS nozzle of
(53) The ACS system may employ mono or bi-propellant.
(54) The ACS is controlled by a microprocessor, sensors, and other avionics (not shown since these are standard commercial elements). The avionics package includes an accelerometer, a GPS, a radio transmitter and receiver, a horizon sensor, and a payload integrity sensor. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand control of the ACS, including employees of Ball Aerospace, Boeing, and Lockheed who regularly maneuver spacecraft. The guidance system preferably uses a combination of GPS and inertial guidance, plus active radio telemetry with the depot in the case of staging materials in LEO. This is discussed further in U.S. Pat. No. 8,536,502 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,664,576 B2. Russia's Progress resupply vehicle use an autonomous docking system composed of the TsVM-101 digital flight computer plus the MBITS digital telemetry system. In 2007 the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) also demonstrated autonomous docking with Orbital Express. DARPA used the Advanced Video Guidance System to control the docking.
(55) The operation of the Gas Gun Launcher is as follows:
(56) For the ocean-based variant, first the OBL is towed or propelled, as shown in
(57) Next the pump and launch tubes are cleaned, and, if honing (described more fully below) is to be utilized to cause the vehicle to spin, the launch tube is honed. The spin direction during honing can determine the amount and direction of spin imparted to the projectile in-bore. Then the launch tube is automatically aligned using feedback from sensors and subsequently applying tension (utilizing the tensioning cables as described above) in the case of the OBL. (The LBL is aligned instead using threaded actuators on mounting piers.) Next the launch vehicle is loaded with propellant and payload and inserted down the launch tube from the muzzle until it seats near the pump tube (and the sliding seal) as in
(58) From this point on the system is operated remotely.
(59) The fast-opening valve in the pump tube is closed while the fast-closing valve in the muffler is opened. A diaphragm, preferably composed of Mylar, is fastened across the muzzle prior to pulling a vacuum in the launch tube. A vacuum of a few Torr is pulled separately in both the launch tube and pump tube to remove heavy gas (e.g. air) that would degrade performance and constitute a parasitic launch mass. Care must be taken to maintain lower pressure behind the projectile so that it does not get pushed toward the muzzle.
(60) The pump tube's annular chamber or reservoir is then charged with cold, pressurized light gas through utility lines. The light gas, preferably hydrogen, or a mixture of light gases is fed into the pump tube as shown in
(61) Upon reaching launch condition temperature and pressure, the tracking radars are notified and the fast-opening valve is opened allowing the light gas working fluid to enter the launch tube behind the launch vehicle in a controlled manner, smoothly accelerating the vehicle along the launch tube.
(62) As the vehicle is accelerated down the launch tube to high speed, it pushes a small amount of shocked air in front. The shocked air impacts the Mylar diaphragm and blows it outward allowing the vehicle to exit the muffler untouched. The hydrogen behind the vehicle stagnates against large areas of a fast-closing valve and drives the valve shut, effectively sealing off the launcher with the hydrogen inside. The hydrogen in the launcher takes several minutes to cool down and it is then pumped out, scrubbed and recycled into the hydrogen vessels on the MP shown in
(63) The fast-closing valve preferably comprises a partition sealingly connected to the inner surface of the muffler, containing an aperture adequate for the passage of the vehicle, and having a door for sealingly closing the aperture rotatably connected to the aperture on the side toward the pump tube. Alternatively, a ball with a diameter larger than the inner diameter of the muffler aperture is placed on the bottom of the muffler, leaving adequate room for passage of the vehicle. The gas behind the vehicle then forces the door closed or pushes the ball into the open end of the muffler.
(64) The hydrogen is expected to thermalize with the tube within 5-15 minutes. The pressure and temperature are anticipated to drop as follows:
(65) TABLE-US-00001 t = 0 t = 1 sec t = 10 minutes Volume (m.sup.3) 1,260 6,170 6,170 Pressure (psi) 15,000 1,620 720 Temp (K) 1,700 900 400
(66) After approximately 10 minutes the hydrogen is pumped through a conventional industrial type scrubber and back into the storage tanks where it preferably resides near 2,650 psi and ambient temperature. While refilling the storage tanks the hydrogen temperature will increase adiabatically unless the tanks are cooled. The inventors expect this cooling can be accomplished, in the case of the OBL, with the surrounding seawater. The preceding is a standard industrial process, and there are many companies of ordinary skill in the art that can design and build the hydrogen scrubbing and recycling system.
(67) The vehicle emerges from the muffler and the sabot petals are separated from the aeroshell by aerodynamic forces. The petals burn while airborne because of air friction at the high speed of the launch, and due to their low ballistic coefficient land within a few kilometers of the muffler. The vehicle may be spinning on exiting the launch tube or may spin up in the atmosphere due to subtly canted fins. For a spinning vehicle, orientation changes are made if needed by driving gyroscopic precession. Assuming force is applied at right angles to the spin axis, the angular precession rate is given by:
=/LEqn. 2
where is torque and L is angular momentum. (See The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. 1 Chapter 20, p. 6, Eqn. 20.15.)
(68) The preferred ACS has a major novel feature in that it achieves vehicle orientation by stroboscopically applying thrust at right angles to the spin axis of the vehicle in accordance with Equation 2 above. This is important and different. Alternatively, conventional ACS thrust maneuvers do not require a spinning vehicle, but they do require more thrusters (typically two thrusters for pitch and two for yaw located near the nose (or tail), as well as at least two for roll located near the center of mass).
(69) Spinning the vehicle can be performed several ways. Fins can be employed, which will be very small canted protuberances on the aft section. They will not stick out more than about 5% of the vehicle diameter, and will have a cant angle of one to five degrees with respect to the vehicle centerline. Their length can be 5-100% of the vehicle diameter. Optionally, grooves similarly oriented on the surface of the vehicle aeroshell can be employed. Another option is to hone the barrel preferentially in one direction. And alternatively, the inventors believe a practical technique is prespinning the vehicle in the launcher prior to launch by spinning the section of launch tube containing the vehicle. Of the three techniques, prespinning the vehicle is likely the most precise. The fin option, however, has a side benefit in that it will stabilize the projectile both gyroscopically as well as by moving the center of pressure further aft of the center of mass. All of these methods can be accomplished by one skilled in the art, although significant engineering and testing will be required.
(70) Equation 2 is more transparent here:
d=(F.Math.l.sub.cm/L)dtEqn. 3
where thrust F is applied at right angles at distance l.sub.cm from the center of mass for time dt to cause a precession of d. Sensors determine the orientation of the vehicle with respect to the horizon so that the microprocessor can issue commands to the controller to pulse the nozzle at the appropriate time. Multiple pulses incrementally achieve the desired orientation. Obviously there are other sensors on-board to determine where the vehicle is relative to any depot or object of rendezvous, as well as relative velocity.
(71) As the vehicle ascends through the atmosphere, the aerospike sees maximum heating and will ablate substantially. The rest of the aeroshell should remain largely undisturbed although the minimal fins may also get ablated somewhat. After attaining approximately 60 to 100 km altitude the aeroshell will be ejected exposing the rocket motor and payload. Shortly thereafter, the rocket motor is ignited and burns for approximately 100 seconds as the vehicle nears the desired orbit or orbital depot. The spinning rocket causes significant centripetal propellant pressure thereby, in the preferred embodiment, circumventing the need for a tank pressurization device or a turbo-pump. The ACS is in communication with any depot or object of rendezvous and continues to guide the spinning rocket/payload assembly as they approach.
(72) In the case of orbital staging of materials, upon arriving near the depot a robotic tug fields the rocket/payload assembly. It determines payload integrity and then delivers the assembly to the depot where materials, e.g. propellant, are off-loaded. Alternatively, the assembly may dock directly with the depot.
(73) Alternatives or options in addition to those discussed above are as follows:
(74) The hydrogen may be heated externally to the pump tube with a self-contained heat exchanger using natural gas or another hydrocarbon and air.
(75) A mixture of gases, for example hydrogen, helium and oxygen, may be heated and their hot reaction products used to propel the vehicle through the launcher.
(76) An all steel, non-buoyant launcher may be used even for the OBL. Of course, the cable supports/buoyancy compensators and the recoil fins/buoyancy compensators can be enhanced to make this feasible.
(77) Composites may include fiberglass, Spectra, Kevlar and other high strength fibers.
(78) The OBL may be towed and serviced by a ship instead of using the Maintenance Platform, or it may be self-propelled.
(79) The recoil fins in the breech area may be replaced with conventional shock absorbers.
(80) The launcher may employ a rotating section of the launch tube to impart spin to the vehicle prior to launch. This may be needed to spin up the fluids in a vehicle with liquid propulsion since they will not spin up as rapidly as a solid propellant vehicle.
(81) The LBL can be based in a tunnel.
(82) The launch tube and pump tube can be placed on support members.
(83) The foregoing is not all-inclusive and other alternatives, options, and variations will be obvious to those of ordinary skill.
(84) As used herein, the term substantially indicates that one skilled in the art would consider the value modified by such terms to be within acceptable limits for the stated value. Also as used herein the term preferable or preferably means that a specified element or technique is more acceptable than another but not that such specified element or technique is a necessity.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
(85) The way in which the Gas Gun Launcher is capable of exploitation in industry and the way in which the Gas Gun Launcher can be made and used are obvious from the description herein.