Device for detecting the positions of a control lever of a gearbox in two axes of rotation

Abstract

A device is mounted with a capability for angular movement in a mounting unit, the movement being detected by an element that is able to send electrical signals within a processing unit. The element consist of a single 2D Hall-effect sensor able to measure the rotations of the magnetic field, the sensor being mounted in close proximity to a dual magnet to measure two rotations of the lever in two planes, each corresponding to the P, R, N, D and M+, M and M positions.

Claims

1. A device for detecting P, R, N, D, M+, M, and M positions of a control lever of a gearbox, the device comprising: a body of the device mounted in a mounting unit, the mounting unit having a fixed portion and a movable portion, the control lever coupled to the movable portion, the movable portion having a capability for angular movements in a first axis and a second axis, the first axis corresponding to movement of the movable portion between the P, R, N, and D positions and the second axis corresponding to movement of the movable portion between the M+, M and M positions; a magnet coupled to the movable portion of the mounting unit, the magnet having a north-south-north orientation or a south-north-south orientation; and a 2D Hall-effect sensor, the 2D Hall-effect sensor coupled to the fixed portion of the mounting unit in close proximity to the magnet, the 2D Hall-effect sensor integrated within a processing unit, the 2D Hall-effect sensor configured to measure rotations of a magnetic field, the rotations of the magnetic field corresponding to movement of the magnet in the first axis and the second axis; wherein the movable portion of the mounting unit includes an articulation rotary joint of the control lever, the articulation rotary joint having a housing, the magnet coupled to the housing.

2. The device of claim 1 wherein movement between the P and D positions corresponds to angular rotation of the control lever of 26 degrees in the first axis.

3. The device of claim 1 wherein movement between the M+, and M positions corresponds to angular rotation of the control lever of 7 degrees in the second axis and movement between the M and M positions corresponds to angular rotation of the control lever of 7 degrees in the second axis.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The invention is explained below in greater detail, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a purely-schematic view showing the mounting of the magnet on the lever, and its positioning in relation to the 2D Hall-effect sensor, with this lever being illustrated in the D position;

(3) FIG. 2 is a side view corresponding to FIG. 1;

(4) FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 1, with the lever being illustrated in the M position;

(5) FIG. 4 is a side view corresponding to FIG. 3;

(6) FIG. 5 is purely-schematic view showing the rotation of the lever around a Y axis corresponding to the P, R, N, D positions;

(7) FIG. 6 is a purely-schematic view showing the rotation of the lever around an axis in a YZ plane corresponding to the M+, M and M positions;

(8) FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 are schematic views showing the rotation of the magnet in relation to the sensor, as a function of the position of the lever, namely the P position to the D position in FIG. 7, the D position to the M position in FIG. 8, and the M+ and M positions in FIG. 9;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) You are reminded that the targeted goal is to detect the P, R, N and D positions of a gear lever (1) (automatic operation) and the M+, M, M positions of the said lever (1) (sequential operation). In a perfectly-known manner, the lever (1) is mounted with a capability for angular movement in a mounting unit (2) by means, for example, of a device of rotary joint type (3).

(10) The lever (1) is designed to be coupled to any type of actuator for control over selection and engagement of gears.

(11) The various positions and the various movements of the lever are detected in order to send electrical signals within a processing unit.

(12) According to the invention, the means designed to send electrical signals within the processing unit consist of a single 2D Hall-effect sensor (4) able to only measure the rotations of the magnetic field.

(13) This 2D sensor is mounted in close proximity to a dual magnet (5), to measure two lever rotations (1) in two planes, each corresponding to the P, R, N, D and the M+, M and M positions.

(14) The 2D Hall-effect sensor is, for example, of Melexis 90 316 type, whereas the dual magnet (5) can be of North-South-North type or South-North-South type.

(15) The 2D sensor (4) is mounted on a fixed part of the mounting unit (2), whereas the dual magnet (5) is mounted in a housing on the articulation rotary joint (3).

(16) The goal sought is to be able to detect a rotation and a lateral movement of the magnet in relation to the sensor.

(17) You are reminded that the P, R, N, D positions of the lever are around one rotation axisfor instance, around the Y axis (see FIG. 5), whereas the M+, M and M positions of the lever are around another rotation axisfor example, in a YZ plane (see FIG. 6)resulting from a tipping of the lever around the axis.

(18) In each plane, the 2D Hall-effect sensor detects an angular rotation as if there was only one magnet.

(19) Each rotation is limited to less than 150. The change from one plane to another takes place with the sideways movement of the dual magnet, which causes a 180 rotation of the magnetic fields.

(20) Refer to FIGS. 7, 8 and 9.

(21) In FIG. 7, the rotation of the lever causes a rotation of the magnet. The sensor measures a rotation of the magnet.

(22) In FIG. 8, when the lever changes from D to M by rotation around the X axis, the magnet is moved sideways. However, because of the positioning of the dual magnet, the sensor measures a rotation of the magnetic field of around 180.

(23) In FIG. 9, the lever moves in a YZ axis. The magnet moves sideways, and mostly in rotation. The sensor D2 measures a rotation of the magnetic field.

(24) For example, from the P position to the D position (see FIG. 7), there is a rotation of around 26 of the magnet, with the sensor perceiving the North and South poles. From the D position to the M position (see FIG. 8), there isas showna rotation of 180 of the magnetic fields. In the D position, the sensor perceives the North and South poles, whereas in the M position, the sensor perceives the South and North poles. From the M position to the M+, M position (see FIG. 9), the rotation of the magnetic fields is around more or less 7, for example.

(25) The result of these arrangements is that the use of a dual magnet enables the perception of two partial rotations, as with a sensor that only perceives a total rotation. One of the partial rotations detects the P, R, N, D positions, whereas the other partial rotation corresponds to the reversal of the ensemble, in order to create magnetic fields for the M+, M positions.

(26) The advantages come clearly to the fore in the description; in particular, we emphasize and restate: the use of a single 2D Hall-effect sensor, by virtue of the use of a dual magnet; the integration of the sensors and the magnet within a limited volume; good precision in rotation through the use of a 2D Hall-effect sensor in opposition to a 3D Hall-effect sensor.

(27) Lastly, we emphasize and restate that the use of a 2D Hall-effect sensor requires a certain tolerance on two axes only, instead of three. Also note that one can choose lower-performing and, therefore, cheaper components, because one can eliminate the aging of the magnet, which is a dual magnet either of North-South-North type or South-North-South type.

(28) The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.