Ion trap mass analyzer apparatus, methods, and systems utilizing one or more multiple potential ion guide (MPIG) electrodes

Abstract

In one aspect of the invention, an ion trap mass analyzer includes a variable- or multi-potential type ion guide (MPIG) assembly which has been pre-configured to produce a parabolic-type potential field. Each MPIG electrode has a resistive coating of designed characteristics. In one example the coating varies in thickness along the length of an underlying uniform substrate. The MPIG assembly can be a single MPIG electrode or an array of a plurality of MPIG electrodes. An array can facilitate delocalization for improved performance. This chemical modification of a uniform underlying substrate promotes cheaper and flexible instruments. The modified MPIG electrodes also allow miniaturization (e.g. micro and perhaps even nano-scale), which allows miniaturization of the instrument in which the single or plural modified MPIG electrode(s) are placed. This promotes portability and field use instead of limitation to laboratory settings.

Claims

1. An ion trap mass analyzer comprising: a. a housing; b. an elongated multi-potential ion guide in the housing, the ion guide having a length and comprising: i. a feed wire; ii. an insulator around the feed wire; iii. an semi-conductive coating on the insulator, the semi-conductive coating having a predetermined variation in thickness; c. a potential supply electrode sub-assembly operatively connected to the ion guide; d. a reference electrode sub-assembly spaced from the supply electrode and along the ion guide; e. so that the predetermined variation in thickness of the semi-conductive coating on the ion guide and the supply and reference electrode sub-assemblies can be correlated to produce a customizable potential energy field relative to the length of the ion guide.

2. The analyzer of claim 1 wherein the insulator comprises a tubular member.

3. The analyzer of claim 2 wherein the tubular member comprises silica.

4. The analyzer of claim 1 wherein the semi-conductive coating comprises polymer.

5. The analyzer of claim 4 wherein the polymer provides resistance in the mega-ohm range.

6. The analyzer of claim 1 wherein the supply electrode sub-assembly is at or near a first end of the ion guide and the reference electrode sub-assembly comprises a single reference electrode spaced from but nearer the first end than a second opposite end of the ion guide.

7. The analyzer of claim 1 wherein the supply electrode sub-assembly is at or near a first end of the ion guide and the reference electrode sub-assembly comprises a set of plural ring reference electrodes spaced along the length of the ion guide.

8. The analyzer of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of additional said ion guides in the housing, the ion guides extending substantially parallel to one another.

9. The analyzer of claim 8 wherein the ion guides are generally parallel.

10. A small-scale ion analyzer apparatus comprising: a. first and second grid reference electrodes spaced apart at a fraction of a millimeter; b. an array of a plurality of multi-potential ion guides extending between the first and second reference electrodes, each ion guide comprising an insulator of micro-scale diameter which has been chemically modified along its axis to create a parabolic potential surface; c. wherein the array creates a radially homogeneous electric field but allows delocalized analysis with improved ion trapping efficiency and ion detection sensitivity.

11. The ion analyzer of claim 10 wherein the diameter of the ion guides is approximately 0.2 mm.

12. The ion analyzer of claim 10 wherein the chemically modified parabolic potential surface varies in thickness along the ion guide length.

13. The ion analyzer of claim 12 wherein the thickness is varied by applying a micro-scale coating of varying thickness.

14. The ion analyzer of claim 12 wherein the thickness is varied by applying a nano-scale coating of varying thickness.

15. The ion analyzer of claim 12 wherein the thickness increases towards a center portion of the ion guide.

16. The ion analyzer of claim 10 wherein the plurality of ion guides comprises tens of ion guides.

17. The ion analyzer of claim 14 wherein the tens of ion guides comprises on the order of twenty ion guides.

18. The ion analyzer of claim 10 in combination with ion introduction and collection components, and detection and processing components.

19. A method of ion analysis comprising: a. introducing a supply of ions; b. utilizing the ion analyzer of claim 1.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the ion analyzer comprises plural said ion guides.

Description

III. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) From time-to-time in this description reference will be taken to the attached Drawings, which are identified and summarized below. These Drawings are a part of and incorporated by reference to this specification.

(2) FIG. 1A is reduced-in-scale perspective view of a multi-potential ion guide (MPIG) used as the mass analyzer in an analytical instrument according to a first exemplary embodiment according to the present invention.

(3) FIG. 1B is a side elevation sectional view of the MPIG of FIG. 1A with an enlarged view of a portion of the MPIG for clarity.

(4) FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating electric potential generated by the semiconductor surface of the MPIG of FIGS. 1A and B in one embodiment and use.

(5) FIG. 3A is a reduced-in-scale perspective view of an analytical instrument, referred to here as a harmonic oscillator ion trap, incorporating the MPIG of FIGS. 1A and B.

(6) FIG. 3B is a partially exploded, partial sectional illustration illustrating the interior structure of the instrument of FIG. 3A, including the MPIG of FIGS. 1A-B.

(7) FIGS. 4A-C are diagrammatical sectional views (left side) of the single MPIG instrument of FIGS. 3A and B, and associated graphs (right side) illustrating the ability of the instrument to trap ions.

(8) FIGS. 5A-C are diagrammatical sectional views (left side) similar to FIGS. 4A-C, and associated graphs (right side) illustrating a specific method of operation of the instrument to provide broadband detection of ions.

(9) FIGS. 6A and 6B are graphs illustrating principles of operation (e.g. frequency response) of the instrument of FIGS. 1-5.

(10) FIG. 7A is a side elevation sectional view of alternative structure of a modified MPIG according to an alternative exemplary embodiment according to the present invention.

(11) FIG. 7B is graph illustrating the voltage gradient produced by the embodiment of FIG. 7A.

(12) FIG. 8 is a sectioned perspective view of an alternative configuration of an analytical instrument using one of the modified MPIGs but with an inductive imaging detection set-up.

(13) FIGS. 9A-C are diagrammatical sectional views (left side) of the single MPIG instrument of FIGS. 7A and B, and associated graphs (right side) illustrating the ability of the instrument to trap and detect ions by the inductive imaging detection set-up of FIG. 8.

(14) FIGS. 10A-E are diagrammatical sectional views (left side) of the single MPIG instrument of FIGS. 7A and B, and associated graphs (right side) illustrating the ability of the instrument of FIG. 8 to eject unwanted ions, and trap and detect ions by inductive imaging detection.

(15) FIG. 11A is a diagrammatic illustration of a simple miniaturized ion trap using a modified MPIG of the configuration of those of FIGS. 1A and B or 7A and B according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(16) FIG. 11B is a diagrammatic simulation of ion trajectory in the trap of FIG. 11A.

(17) FIG. 12 is a plot related to operation of a modified MPIG such as in FIGS. 1A and B or FIGS. 7A and B.

(18) FIG. 13 is a diagrammatic depiction of ion trajectory for a plural modified MPIG array according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

(19) FIG. 14 is a computer generated model of a potential energy well created by the array of FIG. 13.

(20) FIGS. 15A and B are plots of axial position of an ion trapped in an array analyzer of the type of FIG. 13.

(21) FIG. 16 is a partially exploded diagrammatic illustration of an array of plural miniaturized modified MPIGs like the one in FIG. 11A according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The left-side circular member is intended to schematically illustrate that the enlarged in scale array could be a module that could be one or plural such modules combined into a larger apparatus.

(22) FIG. 17A is a perspective view of another configuration of a plural modified MPIG array in assembly with supply and reference electrodes.

(23) FIG. 17B is a schematic depiction of the array of FIG. 17A in section and includes an optional ionization probe.

(24) FIG. 17C is a plot of the potential energy field associated with the array of FIGS. 17A and B.

(25) FIGS. 18A-C are schematic illustrations of ion detection by ion ejection with a plural MPIG array of the type of FIGS. 17A-C.

(26) FIGS. 19A-C are schematic illustrations of inductive detection with Fourier transform analysis with a plural MPIG array of the type of FIGS. 17A-C.

IV. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

A. Overview

(27) As indicated in the Summary of the Invention, a central aspect of the present invention is the utilization of a modified Multi-potential Ion Guide (MPIG) in an ion trap device. The ability to control the resistive coating on an underlying substrate is a cost-effective and flexible way to vary the potential field of the ion guide. This leads to such benefits as cheaper mass analysis instruments, as well as the ability to produce them in a form that can be taken out of laboratory settings and into the field. It has also been discovered that improvements in ion trapping and related functions can be achieved. And, it has been discovered that an array of plural MPIGs can be used in one instrument. The ability to chemically modify each such MPIG by application of such coatings likewise makes a plural ion guide instrument cheaper to produce than use of other state of the art ion guides. It has also been discovered that use of an array of MPIGs can delocalize an ion trap over the plurality of ion guides to boost performance of the instrument.

(28) The invention can take many forms and embodiments. But to better understand the invention, reference should be taken to the following exemplary embodiments and aspects. Discussion of proof of concepts is also included.

B. Single MPIG Examples

(29) Disclosed here are examples of use of a single modified MPIG type electrode in an ion trap instrument. FIGS. 1-6 show the structure of a first example of a single modified MPIG (FIGS. 1A and B), its assembly into an ion trap instrument (FIGS. 2A and B), and diagrams related to its operation in the ion trap. Note particularly that this embodiment produces what is described as a partial parabola (specifically half of a parabola). This is illustrated in FIGS. 2, 4A-C, 5A-C, and 6A-B.

(30) The benefits of such a combination are discussed below. One is that ion motion will oscillate back and forth in the trapping space within the modified MPIG electric field with a frequency that is proportional to the mass of the molecule. This provides a direct way to detect and differentiate mass. Coordinated operation with the other components of the ion trap (e.g. endcap grid electrode) provides an effective ion trap. This leads to use of this combination in a variety of ways including but not limited to mass separation, mass detection, mass selection, and tandem or linked tests.

(31) Note then how a full parabola embodiment is described. This embodiment produces what is described as full parabola (specifically an entire parabola). This is illustrated in FIGS. 7A and B, 9A-C, and 10A-E. This improves the potential field of the modified MPIG and provides other benefits discussed below.

(32) The key to my method of mass analysis is the use of a multi-potential ion guide (MPIG). The MPIG is a single strand ion guide that creates a varying potential field by using user controlled resistive coating as the electrode surface. By varying the conductivity of the surface of the electrode, it is possible to use the single electrode as a voltage dividing device which alters the potential field generated by the ion guide at different locations. This electrode can be used to create any potential surface desired at the center of the spectrometer near the ions flight region. This is in contrast to more common approaches which use multiple external electrodes that attempt to control the ion flight and therefore mass analysis.

(33) Diagrams of the electrode assembly 10 are shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. In one example, a 1 mm aluminum oxide insulator 16 was coated with a combination of a silver doped conductive polymer and a resistive polymer coating 18 to create regions of conductivity as well as discrete resistance along the electrode 12 surface. The polymer coatings 18 were acquired from METCH Electronic Materials Technology and provided resistances in the mega ohm range. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,190 regarding construction of the electrode. Other configurations of coating 18 for achieving a desired potential field according to the invention are, of course, possible.

(34) FIGS. 1A and 1B thus illustrate one example of the basic structure of a modified Multi-potential ion guide (MPIG) type electrode assembly that can be used as the mass analyzer in an analytical instrument such as shown at FIGS. 2A and 2B. Electrode assembly 10 includes a feed wire 14 along the longitudinal axis of the silica insulator 16; as well as an insulator sleeve 28 that allows mounting of electrode 12 in a plate 30 (e.g. can be conductive and used as an ion repeller or otherwise as is known in the art).

(35) When a voltage difference is placed between the two ends of the electrode 12, a potential gradient defined by the resistance will be created. In this manner, a single electrode 12 can be used in a constantly changing field by changing the resistivity of the surface to alter the resultant voltage.

(36) FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating electric potential generated by the semiconductor surface 18 of the MPIG 12. Note how it has a partial parabolic shape.

(37) Shown in FIG. 2 is the variable resistance of the electrode 12 that is used to create a parabolic field gradient. Varying the thickness of a semiconductor coating controls the resistance of the surface 18 resulting in a voltage gradient. This shape of field gradient creates harmonic oscillations of ions that are attracted to the resultant electric fields. In order to mimic a harmonic oscillator, the MPIG 12 was created as half of a parabola. Using an end cap electrode 30 as an electrostatic mirror, ions trapped in the resultant field are reflected back up the field generated by the MPIG 12 creating the effect of being trapped in a potential well. Harmonic oscillations are created by a system that constantly produces a force that is proportional to the location within the system. This kind of proportional force results in ion motion that will oscillate back and forth within the electric field with a frequency that is proportional to the mass of the molecule.

(38) In order for the electrode 12 to produce the desired field, additional electrodes are used to generate the needed field lines. A diagram of the complete analyzer instrument 20 containing the MPIG assembly 10 is shown in FIG. 3.

(39) FIG. 3A illustrates how analytical chamber portion 22 of analyzer 20 can be connected at one end to a mounting plate 24 to allow analyzer 20 to be anchored or attached to other components. Analyzer 20 essentially constitutes a harmonic oscillator ion trap incorporating the MPIG 12.

(40) Ion trajectories within this harmonic oscillator trap were studied theoretically using the ion trajectory simulation program SIMION (available from Scientific Information Services, Inc., 1027 Old York Road, Ringoes, N.J. 08551-1054. USA; see also www.simion.com including documentation for the program. These trajectory studies demonstrated a simple relationship between mass (mass to charge ratio) and frequency of oscillation along the axis of the MPIG.

(41) $\mathrm{Oscilation}\mathrm{Frequency}=\frac{k}{\sqrt{\mathrm{mass}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{molecule}}}$
Where k is a proportionality constant dependent upon the shape of the electric field generated by the MPIG.

(42) A test of the analyzer 20 was accomplished using Cesium Iodide. Cesium Iodide is a standard calibrant used because of its ability to produce cluster ions at repeatable intervals. In this experiment, Cesium ions were desorbed in the analyzer cavity using laser desorption methods (well known in the art). Initially, the ability of the system 20 to trap ions was studied by holding the potential on the end cap grid electrode 36 at a high potential. The potential on the grid electrode 36 kept the ions from leaving the potential field generated by the MPIG 12, thus trapping them within the cavity of the analyzer 20. Following a variable delay, the potential on the grid 36 was dropped and the ions exited the trap and were accelerated into the electron multiplier detector 38, generating a signal. This process is illustrated in FIGS. 4A-C. Through this approach the ability of the system 20 to effectively trap ions was verified.

(43) FIGS. 4A-C illustrate the following: A) Ions are produced by laser desorption of CsI located on the probe 12. Ion formation occurs over a large area within the trap. Ions formed either too prompt or too slow are not trapped in the cell 22. Only ions formed within the low potential energy region of the ion trap are effectively trapped in the potential well. B) trapped ions are allowed to resonant within the field for periods ranging from 2-500 ms. C) the voltage on the grid electrode 36 is dropped and the ions are accelerated from the trap into the detector 38.

(44) Because the oscillatory frequency of each mass is unique, mass determination is accomplished by monitoring an ion's response to an applied rf field. This detection can be achieved by several different methods.

(45) The simplest approach to ion detection in the proposed cell is through the use of an electron multiplier located outside the boundaries of the potential well (FIG. 3). If an rf field is applied to the trap plates it will accelerate any ions of that mass. If any ions of that mass are present in the trap they will be accelerated and escape the trap striking the electron multiplier and thereby creating a signal. If no ions of that mass are present in the cell, no signal will be generated. By sweeping a range of rf frequencies using an rf sweep generator, signals will be detected at the frequencies where ions trapped in the cell come into resonance thus permitting broadband detection. This process is demonstrated in FIG. 5.

(46) FIG. 5 diagrammatically illustrates ions that are formed in the low potential energy region of the trap are stored for periods ranging from 2-500 ms. When a resonant electric field is superimposed on the repeller endcap, ions are accelerated by the resonant field, exit the analyzer, and are detected by the electron multiplier detector.

(47) The results of the ion signal as a function of the frequency of the applied electric field are shown in FIG. 6. FIG. 6 is essentially showing frequency response of what is called here a harmonic oscillator ion trap.

(48) As seen in FIG. 6, signals were generated as a function of the resonant oscillating electric field applied at 260, 150 and 115 kHz which correspond to the expected calibration ions having masses of 133 amu (Cs.sup.+), 393 amu (Cs(CsI)) and 653 amu (Cs(CsI).sub.2). This data clearly illustrates the ability of a modified multi-potential electrode 12 to act as a mass analyzer.

(49) FIG. 12 is a plot of the observed frequency of the ion motion (kHz) as a function of the voltage applied to the MPIG electrode

(50) This initial system was then used to study the oscillatory frequency of the ion motion as a function of the voltage applied to the MPIG. As seen in the FIG. 5, the observed oscillatory frequency of the Cs.sup.+ ions (m/z 133) increases as the square root of the voltage applied to the MPIG. This is consistent with theoretical ion trajectories studied using the ion trajectory simulation program SIMION. These studies demonstrated a simple relationship between mass (mass to charge ratio) and frequency of oscillation along the axis of the MPIG where k is a proportionality constant dependent upon the shape of the electric field generated by the MPIG.

(51) Perturbations in field lines at the junction between the modified MPIG 12 and the endcap grid electrode 36 may cause limitations to both the resolution and trapping efficiency. As shown in FIG. 2, the original MPIG embodiment was created as half of a parabola. This initial design was used to permit effective evaluation of the operation of the system and demonstrate function. Use of the endcap grid electrode 36 as an electrostatic mirror created the effect of an ion being trapped in a parabolic well. However, variations in the field lines at the junction between the MPIG 12 and the end cap 36 distort the periodic motions of the ions to a small extent. These distortions can produce variations in the oscillatory frequency and may result in a loss of resolution and trapping efficiency.

(52) This limitation can be addressed by creating an MPIG that creates the entire parabolic field, eliminating the need for an electrostatic mirror. The cross sectional design of this alternative MPIG 12 is shown in FIG. 7A.

(53) FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram of the cross section of the proposed MPIG 12. FIG. 7B is a diagram illustrating the resultant voltage gradient produced by varying the thickness of the semiconductor polymer 18.

(54) As shown in FIG. 7A, the center of the MPIG 12 will be tapped with a supply wire 14 to feed the voltage to the center 19 of the electrode 12. The rest of the circuit is completed by connections 15L and 15R to the ends of the MPIG 12. The voltage supplied to the center 19 of the electrode 12 is divided by the resistance of the semiconductor 18 resulting in the voltage gradient shown in FIG. 7B. Similar to the original MPIG 12, the thickness of the semiconductor 18 will be varied to produce the desired potential gradient. By creating the complete parabolic potential field, inhomogeneities of the initial design 12 may be eliminated improving the resolution and trapping efficiency of the instrument 20.

(55) In addition to improving the potential field of the analyzer, the complete parabolic electrode 12 also is compatible with alternate methods of ion detection. By allowing the ions to move freely between trapping plates 26 at opposite ends of MPIG 12, their oscillatory frequency can be measured by detecting an induced image in the trapping plates 26. The detected current is generated by the coherent motion of a packet of ions as it moves between the opposing plates 26. This type of detection eliminates the need for the electron multiplier detector further reducing the size requirements of the instrument. A diagram of an instrument 20 is shown in FIG. 8, a cutaway view of a harmonic oscillator ion trap using inductive plate detection.

(56) This induced image current can be amplified by a high impedance differential amplifier to produce a detectable frequency using a standard oscilloscope or an analog-to-digital (A-D) converter. When ions of only one mass are driven into coherence, a single frequency corresponding to that m/z will be detected. If a range of rf frequencies are applied, such that ions of all masses are driven into coherence (but not ejected), then the detected signal will be a complex mixture of the sum of the individual frequencies. This complex mixture can be deconvoluted using a Fourier or Hadamard transform into the individual frequency components. This process is illustrated in FIGS. 9A-C.

(57) FIG. 9A diagrammatically illustrates ions formed and trapped within the analyzer chamber with initially random velocity vectors will exhibit random phases of the periodic motions. FIG. 9B illustrates application of an rf excitation of all frequencies across the endcap electrodes 26 gives the ions energy and induces coherence of their periodic motion. FIG. 9C illustrates the rf electric field is turned off and the ions continue to move with their natural periodic motion, inducing an image current in the detection plates of the analyzer.

(58) Using this method it is possible to simultaneously detect the frequencies of all ions trapped in the cell and produce a mass spectrum. The performance characteristics of the mass analyzer are greatly enhanced by using Fourier transform data analysis (well known in the art). Because ion detection is based on a digitized frequency instead of a detector response, mass resolution is based on time of observation. This results in both an improvement in signal to noise ratio as well as resolution.

(59) In addition to the inherent advantages of Fourier analysis on the induced image current, this approach also permits tandem mass spectrometry experiments.

(60) FIG. 10A diagrammatically illustrates a mixture of ions are trapped within the analyzer chamber. FIG. 10B shows resonant excitation of unwanted ions accelerates them beyond the boundaries of the analyzer chamber. FIG. 10C depicts isolated ions of interest are trapped within the analyzer chamber for chemical study. FIG. 10D indicates how the selected ions are driven into coherence by rf electric field excitation and FIG. 10E, how they are detected using the inductance detection plates.

(61) Tandem mass spectrometry, or linked scans allows mixtures of compounds to be separated into their individual components by selecting a specific compound for study. The selected ion can then be analyzed for structural identification by several different processes, such as photo-dissociation or collision induced dissociation. Typically, this type of analysis requires two complete instruments that are connected by an interface. In Fourier transform instruments, the separation and analysis is separated in time rather than space allowing greater flexibility in structural elucidation studies. Illustrated in FIGS. 10A-E is an example of a simple MS-MS experiment. The ability to eliminate unwanted ions from the analyzer has already been demonstrated by the data shown in FIGS. 6A-B. These peaks observed in those spectra were generated by the rf ejection of selected ions using resonant electric field excitation. Using this proven technique, ions of interest can be selected within the analyzer for chemical and structural study. Because the analysis is separated in time, multiple experiments can be conducted on the sample ion. The potential for continuing studies in time on trapped ions is referred to as MS.sup.n and is possible only in a few select research grade mass analyzers.

(62) Unlike presently available mass spectrometers which are constructed by machining complex shapes to create the required field lines, the electric fields generated by the MPIG are created by chemical modification of an insulator. Using the advances in nano-science and nano-chemistry, the process of chemical modification at the micro scale is a well-developed technique and known to those skilled in the art. Therefore, creation of a microscale MPIG analyzer is within the reach of presently existing scientific methods. As previously stated, mass spectrometry is already used in all areas of analysis because of its powerful ability to identify molecules present at only trace levels in the environment. Miniaturization of the analyzer would permit detection of environmental hazards, such as radioactive isotopes, radon, pesticides, and also be routinely used by law enforcement for detection of drugs, accelerants, and explosives while in the field eliminating the need to collect the samples and transport them to a laboratory for analysis.

(63) The ability to miniaturize this type of analyzer has been studied theoretically in my laboratory using SIMION. Contained in FIG. 11B is the theoretical trajectory for an ion trapped in a parabolic electric field generated by a single MPIG electrode 12 and a flat reference electrode 44. The dimensions of this ion trap 40 have been reduced to 0.2 mm. As seen in the theoretical trajectory the ions are effectively trapped using a voltage of only 500V. Frequency analysis of the axial motion shows the same mass to frequency relationship as seen on the larger scale. This simulation confirms the ability to reduce the size of the analyzer and the voltage requirements of the MPIG.

(64) Thus FIG. 11A gives a diagrammatical indication of a model of a simple miniaturized ion trap and FIG. 11B the simulated ion trajectory of ions trapped by such an MPIG calculated using SIMION.

(65) Because the analyzer can reduced to this dimension, it is possible to combine a large number of MPIG electrodes in to an array sensor. This type of sensor would boost the performance of the analyzer by delocalizing the ion trap over a large number of miniature electrodes. A conceptual illustration of such an analyzer is shown in FIG. 16:

(66) The FIG. 16 a conceptual diagram of a miniaturized MPIG array detector 50 utilizing two grid reference electrodes 44 and 46 and an array of MPIG electrodes 12 to trap and analyze trapped ions. Additional discussion of a plural MPIG array is below.

C. Plural MPIG Array Example

(67) Basic principles about the array are as follows. Reference can also be taken to attached FIGS. 12, 13, 14, 15A and B, 16, 17A-C, 18A-C, and 19A-C.

(68) Disclosed are examples of use of a plural MPIG array in an ion trap instrument. FIGS. 13, 16, and 17A-C and 19A-C illustrate the structure of a plural MPIG array. Diagrammatic views related to its principle of operation are also referenced. Note particularly that this embodiment permits delocalized analysis increasing both the sensitivity and the dynamic range of the instrument compared to other available methods of mass analysis.

(69) The benefits of such a combination are discussed below. That discussion confirms compatibility of this array version with various mass analysis methods.

(70) Tests illustrate the ability of a single chemically treated electrode to perform mass analysis, the same approach can be used to create an analyzer comprised of multiple discrete electrodes. Using several discrete electrodes permits delocalized analysis increasing both the sensitivity and the dynamic range of the instrument compared to other available methods of mass analysis. The array of MPIG electrodes would also produce a radially homogeneous electric field. By eliminating the radial inhomogeneity, the oscillatory frequencies of the trapped ions would be unaffected by motion perpendicular to parabolic field, thus resulting in increased resolution. Because the oscillatory motion is not perturbated by radial fields, ions that are injected into the analyzer would not need to be collimated or relaxed into a specific location to permit analysis. This geometry will not only simplify the trapping and detection of injected ions but also greatly improve ion trapping efficiency and therefore sensitivity. Using this approach also simplifies the introduction and collection of ions from external ion sources such as Electrospray Ionization (ESI) enhancing its effectiveness for biological samples. Finally, because of the frequency dependent motion of the ions, this analyzer is compatible with multiple established methods of ion detection.

(71) The theoretical trajectories for ions trapped in a delocalized MPIG array mass analyzer were studied using SIMION. The trajectory of an ion trapped in the parabolic field generated by an array of twenty MPIG electrodes is shown in FIG. 13. It is important to note that the ion is not constrained by a single electrode but is free to move in a radial direction between the electrodes. The parabolic potential surface created along the axial direction is illustrated in FIG. 14.

(72) FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate the theoretical trajectory of an ion and cross section of the potential energy well of a delocalized MPIG array mass analyzer calculated using the ion simulation program SIMION.

(73) The electric field traps the ions and induces a harmonic motion along the axial direction. The lack of a potential barrier between the individual electrodes results in the flat region in the center of the field. This region permits the ions to freely move in a radial direction within the center of the array. Because of the relative potential difference between the center of the array and the outside edge, the potential barrier that exists at the extremes of the array traps the ions in a radial direction. The lack of a radial component in the center of the field increases resolution because the frequency of the ion motion along the axis of the electrodes is unperturbed by radial acceleration. This results in an oscillatory frequency that is dependent only upon the mass of the ion and the potential of the electrode.

(74) The frequency of ion motion in the MPIG array analyzer can be examined by analyzing the axial position of the theoretical trajectories of ions as illustrated in FIGS. 15A and B.

(75) FIGS. 15A and B are plots of the axial position of an ion trapped in the array analyzer calculated by SIMION. FIG. 15A contains the axial location of an ion following a trapping time of 2000 ms. The resultant sinusoidal plot indicates the periodic motion of the trapped ion. Contained in 15B is the axial location of the trapped ion following a total trapping time of 4000 ms. Although it can be noted that the amplitude of the motion has decreased due to redirection of the ion motion in the radial direction, the frequency remained the same. This further illustrates that the frequency of the ion motion is solely related to the mass of the ion and not the radial energy.

(76) Because the effect of radial or divergent trajectories has little or no effect on the analysis of trapped ions, this geometry is ideally suited for trapping and detection of ions produced from an external ion source. Because ions can be introduced into the trap without regard to position or radial kinetic energy, interfaces for ionization are simplified. Therefore, the proposed analyzer provides a straightforward inexpensive route to a low cost, high performance Fourier transform ion trap mass analyzer. This analyzer is ideally suited for biological samples that are commonly introduced from an external ion source.

(77) The periodic motion of the trapped ions along the axial direction is compatible with inductive detection methods and consequently Fourier transform methods of data analysis. Inductive detection methods permit a multi-channel or Felleget advantage in signal to noise ratio relative to dispersive techniques of detection. Because there is no tradeoff between sensitivity and resolution, high resolution mass measurements are possible for this type of instrument. Furthermore, since our previous work with this instrument demonstrates the ability to eject selected ions from the ion trap for resonant detection, it is possible to eject unwanted ions from the trap for selected ion studies in an MS-MS experiment. Using the flexibility inherent in the design of this ion trap, MS-MS and MS.sup.n experiments could be made available at a lower cost to a wider range of laboratories and applications than currently have this technology.

(78) Finally, miniaturization of the proposed analyzer is simplified because the electrodes in this instrument are created by chemical modification in contrast to mechanically changing the physical shape of the electrode as in other mass analyzers. The ability to miniaturize this type of analyzer has been studied theoretically in my laboratory using SIMION. Contained in FIG. 11B is the theoretical trajectory for an ion trapped in a parabolic electric field generated by a single MPIG electrode and a flat reference electrode (see FIG. 11A). The dimensions of the ion trap have been reduced to 0.2 mm. As seen in the theoretical trajectory, the ions are effectively trapped using a voltage of only 500V. Frequency analysis of the axial motion shows the same mass to frequency relationship as seen on the larger scale. This simulation not only confirms the ability to reduce the size of the analyzer, but also the voltage requirements of the MPIG.

(79) Thus FIGS. 11A and B provide a theoretical model of a simple miniaturized ion trap and the simulated ion trajectory of ions trapped by the MPIG calculated using SIMION.

(80) Because the analyzer can be reduced to this dimension, it is possible to boost the performance of the analyzer by combining a large number of MPIG electrodes into a miniaturized array. A conceptual diagram of the miniaturized MPIG array is shown in FIG. 16; a conceptual diagram of a miniaturized MPIG array detector 50 utilizing two grid reference electrodes and an array of MPIG electrodes to trap and analyze trapped ions.

(81) One example of such a system is comprised of more than a few (e.g. twenty-two) individual MPIG electrodes 12 anchored to a single base electrode 44 and a separate reference electrode 46 that defines the potential field (see FIG. 17A).

(82) A diagram of the proposed analyzer and the resultant potential energy field is shown in FIGS. 17B and C respectively. The depth of the potential well is a controlled by a negative bias voltage applied to end of the MPIG electrodes through the base electrode. The electric field gradient generated by the MPIG electrode is a result of the voltage difference between the potential applied to the base and to the tip of the electrode. This is controlled by a shielded feed wire at the center of the MPIG. In addition, an electrically isolated reference electrode is added at the base of the analyzer to define the boundary of the ion trap. This potential serves to create an electrostatic barrier such that any ions formed within the boundaries of the array will be trapped by the potential at the tip of the MPIG and the potential of the reference electrode. The shape of the potential well between these two extremes is defined by the thickness of the resistive polymer coating of the MPIG electrode. Though this approach, the shape of the potential well can be optimized to provide the best possible performance characteristics. In the initial test of the system, the MPIG will be constructed to create half of the parabolic well with the reference electrode acting as an electrostatic mirror generating a complete parabolic well. Although multiple shapes have been tested in our laboratory, previous experiments have indicated that this geometry provides the greatest flexibility for evaluating performance.

(83) FIGS. 18A-C illustrate ion detection using an electron multiplier by ion ejection with a resonant rf electric field.

(84) Ion detection can be accomplished with an electron multiplier using resonant ion ejection similar to mass instability detection schemes in a quadruple ion trap mass spectrometer. This detection method has been previously tested in the single electrode MPIG analyzer, and permit us to evaluate trapping and detection of ions formed from different ionization methods (e.g., Electron impact ionization, Laser desorption, and Electrospray ionization). The process is illustrated in FIGS. 18A-C. Ions can be produced in the center of the array by electron impact of volatile samples. Electron impact ionization was selected for the primary test of the MPIG array mass analyzer because it provides a reliable baseline with consistent ion formation. Following ion formation, ions will be trapped within the boundaries of the potential well with random locations and velocity vectors. After a stabilization delay, an rf voltage will be applied to the reference electrode (FIG. 18B). As the ions trapped within the MPIG array come into resonance with the applied electric field, they will gain translational energy along the axis of the ion trap. When the energy of the ions becomes greater than potential boundary of the trap, they will exit and be accelerated into an electron multiplier detector.

(85) A solid insertion probe compatible with laser desorption can be used to create ions. As in previous experiments, Cesium Iodide can be ionized using a Continuum pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Cesium Iodide's ability to produce high molecular weight clusters allows us to investigate the effect of mass on both resolution and ion storage. In order to demonstrate the utility of the technique, ions formed from an external ESI source can be directly injected into the ion trap. These experiments evaluate the ability of the MPIG array to trap and analyze externally produced ions, as well as to and determine the effective mass range of the instrument. Part of the advantages of this design is the ease in which ionization sources can be interchanged with little or no inconvenience to the operator.

(86) In addition to ion detection using an electron multiplier, the periodic motion of ions can also be detected using inductive detection techniques. A diagram of inductive detection followed by Fourier transform analysis is illustrated in FIGS. 19A-C.

(87) FIGS. 19A-C are illustrations of inductive detection and Fourier transform analysis in the proposed MPIG array mass analyzer.

(88) Ions are once again formed within the center of the MPIG array and trapped in the potential field. By application of either a rapid sweep of rf frequency range (i.e., chirp excitation) or a short dc pulse (i.e., impulse excitation) the entire mass range of ions trapped in the array will be accelerated to higher kinetic energies and driven into coherent motion (FIG. 19B). Owing to the ability of the coherent ion packets to spread out in a radial direction throughout the full cross section of the array, it is possible to collect and trap larger numbers of ions without the effects of ion-ion repulsion. This increases the dynamic range and enhances inductive detection by utilizing larger ion densities. In such an experiment, a charge fluctuation generated by the motion of the ions can be detected by placing a low noise amplifier between the reference electrode and a detection electrode located at the tip of the MPIG electrodes. The image current that is generated can be digitized and analyzed using Fourier transform or other frequency analysis methods. As mentioned previously, this method provides an inherent increase in the signal-to-noise ratio because all of the ions are simultaneously detected.

(89) Inductive detection methods and subsequent Fourier analysis also provide the potential for in-depth investigations of molecular structure or compound reactivity though MS-MS experiments. For example, as demonstrated in previous experiments, ions can be accelerated out of the trap using a resonant rf electric field. The ability to selectively remove ions provides the basis for isolating ions of a single mass within the trap. When analyzing a mixture or complex structure, this allows a specific ion to be selected for further study in order to examine its specific mass spectrum or chemical reactivity. Because ions can be stored in the trap for extended periods of time, the variety of the experiments possible are almost unlimited. Thus, this analyzer provides the power and flexibility of other Fourier transform instruments without the associated cost.

(90) We built and tested multiple systems that used MPIG electrodes as analyzers. Different shaped fields including full parabolic fields and half parabolic fields were constructed and tested. Theoretical trajectory studies have been done for the development of a multi-electrode array analyzer. The results of these studies clearly show that by creating a true parabolic well without radial inhomogeneities, ion trapping and resolution are enhanced. Further, the system has already demonstrated the ability to perform resonant ion ejection which permits MS-MS and MS.sup.n experiments. This enables enhanced selectivity as well as flexibility in ion identification.

(91) Examples of tests include: (a) resonant detection using selected ion acceleration and electron multiplier detector (create ions using electron impact and create ions using laser desorption of CSI; (b) inductive detection and Fourier analysis using the back plate of the ion trap as a detector; (c) ion isolation using resonant ejection and subsequent detection of remaining ions (MS-MS and MS.sup.n); (d) evaluation of mass resolution, trapping efficiency, and sensitivity/dynamic range enhancements; and (e) continue development of resistive polymer electrodes.

(92) An optional application may be evaluation of high mass performance characteristics using an external source Electrospray Ionization (ESI) ionization method. An additional advantage of this system is that ions can be simply introduced into a delocalized trap. This makes adaptation to external ion formation simple. Adapting ESI and other atmospheric pressure sources permits this analyzer to be ideal for high mass introduction and analysis therefore providing gains in sensitivity for biomolecule analysis.

(93) As mentioned above, miniaturization using the above concepts is possible. The design of the MPIG array analyzer simplifies ion introduction and trapping compared to other mass analyzers. Because there is no radial component in a delocalized analyzer, ions can be sprayed into the trap without having to collisionally cool or squeeze the radial motion. Trajectory studies show that ions that are deflected in a radial direction maintain the same axial frequency at lower amplitude (true harmonic oscillator). The ion trap effectively pre-concentrates the sample by ionizing and collecting ions over a long period of time, thus improving the limits to detection. Because the ions are delocalized over a wider area, more ions can be detected without space charge interferences, thus increasing both dynamic range and sensitivity.

(94) One of the most powerful outcomes of this research is the development of a mass analyzer that can provide the power and flexibility to conduct extensive mass spectrometry studies without the cost or upkeep of the typical high performance instruments. Reducing the cost while expanding the range of applications is enhanced by both the simplicity of the design coupled with potential for miniaturization. The reduction of size and cost of the instrument will allow mass spectrometry experiments of the type described in this proposal to be performed in a wider range of laboratories both academic and industrial. In addition, as this type of technology continues to develop, mass analyzers will become routine instrumentation throughout all the scientific disciplines. As the need for more specific information increases within our society, so does our need to develop new methods of instrumentation that can be made widely available.

D. Options and Alternatives

(95) As will be appreciated by those skilled in this art, the invention is not limited to the specific forms and embodiments presented herein. Variations obvious to those skilled in the art will be included.

(96) For example, specific configurations of the components, including the specific shape and characteristics of the coating of the modified MPIG, can vary according to need or desire by those skilled in the art. Likewise, operating parameters for any of the configurations can be varied and selected by those skilled in the art according to desire or need for a given situation.

(97) Additionally, the scale of the instrument can vary according to need or desire.

(98) Still further, the specific mode of operation of the ion trap instrument can vary, as intimated above. Likewise, combination with linked or integrated other tests or methods is discussed.

(99) The apparatus, systems, and methods of the invention can also be applied to a wide variety of analytes.

(100) The specific examples given herein are by way of example and not limitation.

(101) TABLE-US-00001 Table of Citations i. Vestal, M. J.A.S.M.S., 2011, 22(6), 953-959 ii. Beck, H. Methods in Molecular Biology 2010, 593, 263-282 iii. Hanson, C.; Simet, I.; Smith, S., J. Iowa Academy of Science, 1993, 100, 1-8. iv. Hanson, C.; Castro, M.; Russell, D.; Hunt, D.; Shabanowitz, J. Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry: Evolution, Innovation, and Applications, ACS Symposium Series 359, Chapter 6, 1988, Ed. M. V. Buchanan v. Li, Y.; Su, X.; Stahl, P.; Gross, M. Anal. Chem 2007, 79(4), 1569-1574 vi. McLean, J.; Ruotolo, B.; Gillig, K.; Russell, D. Int. J. Mass Spect. 2005, 240(3), 301-315. vii. Cologna, S.; Russell, W.; Lim, P.; Vigh, G.; Russell, D. J.A.S.M.S. 2010, 21(9), 1612-1619 viii. Fenn, J.; Mann, M.; Meng, C; Wong, S.; Whitehouse, Science, 1989, 24(4926) 64-71 ix. Subhodaya, A.; Chait, B. Anal. Chem., 1991, 63 (15), 1621-1625 x. Liu, J; Wang, H; Manicke, N.; Lin, J; Cooks, R. Anal Chem 2010, 82(6), 2463-2471 xi. Todd, J. Chemical Analysis 1989, 102, 1-30, 445-9 xii. Curtiss D. Hanson, Eric L. Kerley, David H. Russell, Recent Developments in Experimental FT-ICR, Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Second Edition, Part 1, Volume 11, Chapter 2, 1989, Ed. M. Bursey. J. Wiley Publ xiii. Hu, QZ; Noll, RJ; Li, HY; Makarov, A; Hardman, M; Cooks, RG J. Mass Spec. 2005, 40 (4): 430-443. xiv. Bruce, J.; Anderson, G.; Smith, R. Anal. Chem., 1996, 68 (3), 534-541 xv. Kingdon KH 1923, 21(4): 408-418 xvi. Oakey, N.; Macfarlane, R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1967, 49, 220-228. xvii. Geno, P.; Macfarlane, R. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1986, 74, 43-57. xviii. Brown, R.; Gilfrich, N. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 697-701. xix. Wolf, B.; Macfarlane, R. J.A.S.M.S. 1992, 3, 706-715. xx. Geno, P.; Macfarlane, R. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1986, 74, 43-57. xxi. Just, C. L.; Hanson, C. D. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 7, 502-506. xxii. Hanson, C.; Just, C. Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 3676-3680 xxiii. Hanson, C. U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,913, 2000. xxiv. Hanson, C. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 448-453 xxv. Hanson, C.; Trent, P. U.S. Pat. No. # 6,657,190, 2003 xxvi. Schulten, H., Lattimer, R. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2005, 3, 233 xxvii. Richarsaon, S. D. Analytical Chem. 2006, 78, 4021 xxviii. Fenselau, C. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 105A xxix. Cooks, R. G., Busch, K. L., Glish, G. L. Science, 1983, 222, 273 xxx. Burlingame, A. L., Whitney, J. I., Russell, D. H. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 363R xxxi. Hanson, C. D., Kerley, E. L., Russell, D. H. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Chapter 2, Ed. J. D. Weinford, Pub. J. Wiley and Sons, 1989 xxxii. Markarov, A. Analytical Chem. 2000, 72, 1156 xxxiii. Hu, Q., Noll, R. J. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 430 xxxiv. Bonner, R.; Lawson, G.; Todd, J.; March, R. Adv. Mass Spectrom. 1974, 6, 377 xxxv. Fulford, J.; March, R. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1978, 26, 155 xxxvi. McIver, R. T. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1970, 41, 555 xxxvii. Hanson, C. D.; Castro, M. E.; Kerley, E. L.; Russell, D. H. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 520 xxxviii. Neuhauser, W.; Hohenstatt, M.; Toschek, P. E.; Dehmelt, H. Phys. Rev. A 1980, 22, 1137 xxxix. Allison, J.; Stepnowski, R. M. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 1072A xl. Hanson, C. D., et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,190, Variable Potential Ion Guide 2003