BIODEGRADABLE UREA-FORMALDEHYDE-BASED SAND-FIXING POLYMER MATERIAL WITH SLOW NUTRIENT RELEASE AND WATER ABSORPTION AND RETENTION

Abstract

formaldehyde-based polymer composite is coated on a surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric, and is embedded in meshes of the biodegradable polymer fabric. There is intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric.

Claims

1. A biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention, comprising: a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention; and a biodegradable polymer fabric; wherein the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite is coated on a surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric, and is embedded in meshes of the biodegradable polymer fabric; and there is intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric.

2. The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material of claim 1, wherein an interfacial bonding strength between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric is greater than a breaking strength of the biodegradable polymer fabric.

3. A method for preparing the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material of claim 1, consisting of: coating the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on the surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric, followed by thermal curing of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on the surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric, rolling and drying to obtain the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein a coating mass of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on the biodegradable polymer fabric is 0.1-0.5 g/cm.sup.2.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein a pressure of the rolling is greater than 0 MPa and equal to or less than 11 MPa; and a speed of the rolling is 10-50 rpm.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein the thermal curing is performed at 45-65° C. for 0.5-4 h; and a temperature of the drying is 45-65° C.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite is prepared through steps of: adding formaldehyde and urea into a reaction vessel, followed by adjustment to pH 8 and reaction at a first preset temperature for a first preset time; and adding an inorganic fertilizer containing phosphorus and potassium, and a superabsorbent polymer (SAP) or a monomer of the SAP into the reaction vessel, followed by reaction at a second preset temperature for a second preset time to obtain the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite in a viscous state.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first preset temperature is 30-60° C.; and the first preset time is 0.5-4 h.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the second preset temperature is 40-80° C.; and the second preset time is 0.5-4 h.

10. A water-retention, wind-proofing, and sand-fixation method for a region in need thereof, comprising: applying the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material of claim 1 to the region. A biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention, including a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention, and a biodegradable polymer fabric. The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on the biodegradable polymer fabric is 0.1-0.5 g/cm2.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] The accompanying drawings needed in the description of the embodiments of the disclosure will be briefly described below to explain the technical solutions of the present disclosure more clearly. Obviously, presented in the accompanying drawings are merely some embodiments of the present disclosure, and other drawings can be obtained by those skilled in the art based on the drawings provided herein without paying creative effort.

[0034] FIG. 1 shows the infrared (IR) spectra of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 2 and the polylactic acid (PLA) fabric obtained by stripping corn straw (CS)-modified polyacrylic acid (PAAcs)/mono-potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH.sub.2PO.sub.4)/urea formaldehyde (UF)-1 from the surface of the PLA fabric of composite prepared in Comparative Example 1;

[0035] FIG. 2 shows the tensile strength of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2;

[0036] FIG. 3 shows the water absorption curves of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2;

[0037] FIG. 4A is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared in Example 1 after water adsorption;

[0038] FIG. 4B is a SEM image of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared in Example 2 after water adsorption;

[0039] FIG. 4C is a SEM image of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared in Example 3 after water adsorption;

[0040] FIG. 5 shows the wind erosion curves in the presence and absence of a cylindrical sand-protecting barrier formed by the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared by Example 2;

[0041] FIG. 6A shows the nitrogen (N) release curves of the sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2;

[0042] FIG. 6B shows the phosphine (P) release curves of the sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2;

[0043] FIG. 7 shows the water-holding capacity of the sand samples added with the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2, respectively; and

[0044] FIG. 8 shows the water retention capacity of sand samples added with the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2, respectively.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0045] The present disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments and accompanying drawings. Obviously, described below are merely some embodiments of this disclosure, and are not intended to limit the disclosure. Other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments provided herein without paying any creative effort should fall within the scope of the present disclosure.

[0046] Measurement methods in this application are described below.

(1) Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy

[0047] The surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric after the urea-formaldehyde-based composite stripped from the surface of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material was analyzed by IR spectroscopy.

(2) Tensile Strength

[0048] The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material was cut into obtaining strips with 30×100 mm.sup.2, which were tested for the tensile strength by using a high-low temperature universal tensile testing machine, where a clamp distance was 50 mm; a calibration distance was 25 mm; a speed was 30 mm/min; and 5 replicates were set for each test.

(3) Water Absorption Capacity

[0049] The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material sample was weighed at room temperature, placed in a 300-mesh nylon bag with known weight, and then put into a beaker with 300 mL of distilled water. The sample was taken out every other 10 min, wiped with skimmed cotton and then weighed. The measurement was continuously performed for 120 min. The water absorption rate Q.sub.eq (g/g) was calculated as formula (1):

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}{Q}_{\mathrm{eq}}=\frac{M-M_0}{M_0}\times 100;& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

[0050] where M is the weight of the sample after water absorption and M.sub.0 is the weight of the sample before water absorption.

(4) N and P Release

[0051] The sample was put into a 300-mesh nylon bag, and buried in 500 g of sand at a depth of 3 cm. The humidity of the sand was kept at 20% during the whole test process. The sample was destructively sampled, weighed, and subjected to N and P content tests, respectively, on days 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30.

(5) Anti-Wind Erosion Capacity

[0052] 500 g of sand were piled into a sandpile with a diameter of 10 cm and a height of 5 cm on a plastic plate. A bag (length: 10 cm; and width: 5 cm) made of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material was filled with 40 g of sand and laid at a windward side of the sandpile. Wind with a speed of 15 m/s (corresponding to near gale) was adopted, and the sand was weighed at different moments.

(6) Water-Holding Capacity

[0053] The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material was woven into a bag with a length of 10 cm and a width of 5 cm. 40 g of sand were put into the bag to form a sandbag. The sandbag was placed in a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube with a diameter of 4.5 cm (a bottom of the PVC tube was sealed with a 300-mesh nylon bag) and weighed (denoted as MI). Then the PVC tube was fixed on an iron support, and fed with tap water from its top until tap water seeped out from the bottom of the sandbag. The PVC tube was allowed to stand for a period till there was no tap water seeped from the sandbag, and then the sandbag was taken out from the PVC tube and weighed (denoted as M.sub.2). The water-holding rate (WH%) was calculated as formula (2):

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{WH}\%=\frac{\left(M_2-M_1\right)\times 100}{40}.& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

(7) Water Retention Capacity

[0054] The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material was woven into a bag with a length of 10 cm and a width of 5 cm. 40 g of sand were put into the bag to form a sandbag. The sandbag was placed into a 500 mL plastic bottle and weighed (denoted as Mo). The sand was gradually wetted with tap water till saturated, where the amount of tap water was determined according to the water-holding rate of the sand. The plastic bottle containing the sandbag was weighed again (denoted as M.sub.1). The plastic bottle was weighed at the same time every day until its weight was constant. A water retention rate (WR %) was calculated through formula (3):

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{WR}\%=\frac{\left(M_i-M_0\right)\times 100}{M_1-M_0}.& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

[0055] Technical solutions of the present disclosure and the prior art will be described below in detail.

[0056] Provided herein was a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention, including a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention and a biodegradable polymer fabric; where the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention included a urea-formaldehyde polymer, a SAP, an inorganic fertilizer; where the SAP is PAAcs; the inorganic fertilizer is KH.sub.2PO.sub.4; and the biodegradable polymer fabric is PLA fabric.

[0057] The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials of Examples 1-3 were prepared according to the following steps.

[0058] (S1) Formaldehyde and urea were added into an airtight reaction vessel to obtain a mixed solution, where a molar ratio of formaldehyde to urea was 1:2. The mixed solution was adjusted to pH 8 and reacted at 40° C. for 2 h to obtain a methylol urea (MU) solution.

[0059] (S2) An acrylic acid (AA) solution was adjusted to neutralization of 80% by using potassium hydroxide (KOH). The AA solution, pre-treated CS, KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 and ammonium persulfate were successively added into the MU solution, in which a weight ratio of AA to CS to ammonium persulfate was 100:10:0.3; and a weight ratio of KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 to the MU in the MU solution was 1:20. The mixed solution was reacted at 60° C. for 2 h under a nitrogen atmosphere to obtain a viscous composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-n, where n was a weight ratio of AA to MU.

[0060] (S3) The composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-n was coated on a surface of the PLA fabric at 0.2 g/cm.sup.2, cured at 55° C. for 2 h, and rolled at 0.6 MPa and 40 rpm by using a padder.

[0061] (S4) The PLA fabric coated with the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-n obtained in step (S3) was dried at 55° C. to a constant weight, so as to obtain the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material.

[0062] The weight ratio of AA to MU in Example 1 was 1.5:1.0; the weight ratio of AA to MU in Example 2 was 1.0:1.0; the weight ratio of AA to MU in Example 3 was 0.5:1.0

[0063] Regarding Example 1, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material, which was prepared by the PLA fabric coated with the urea-formaldehyde-based composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1.5, had a tensile strength of 2.42 MPa and a water absorption rate of 21.67 g/g, and contained 6.55 wt. % of element N, 0.61 wt. % of element P (in P.sub.2O.sub.5) and 24.97 wt. % of element K (in K.sub.2O).

[0064] Regarding Example 2, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material, which was prepared by the PLA fabric coated with the urea-formaldehyde-based composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1, had a tensile strength of 2.66 MPa and a water absorption rate of 41.59 g/g, and contained 11.03 wt. % of element N, 1.03 wt. % of element P (in P.sub.2O.sub.5) and 21.37 wt. % of element K (in K.sub.2O).

[0065] Regarding Example 3, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material, which was prepared by the PLA fabric coated with the urea-formaldehyde-based composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-0.5, had a tensile strength of 0.7 MPa and a water absorption rate of 10.06 g/g, and contained 16.76 wt. % of element N, 1.57 wt. % of element P (in P.sub.2O.sub.5) and 16.77 wt. % of element K (in K.sub.2O).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1

[0066] Provided herein was a composite PLA+(PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1), which was prepared through the following steps.

[0067] (S1) Formaldehyde and urea were added into an airtight reaction vessel to obtain a mixed solution, where a molar ratio of formaldehyde to urea was 1:2. The mixed solution was adjusted to pH=8 and reacted at 40° C. for 2 h to obtain a methylol urea (MU) solution. This step was identical to step (S1) in Examples 1-3.

[0068] (S2) An acrylic acid (AA) solution was adjusted to neutralization of 80% by using KOH. The AA solution, pre-treated CS, KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 and ammonium persulfate were successively added into the MU solution, in which a weight ratio of the MU in the MU solution to AA to CS to ammonium persulfate to KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 was 100:100:10:0.3:5. The mixed solution was reacted at 60° C. for 2 h under a nitrogen atmosphere to obtain the viscous composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1. This step was identical to step (S2) in Example 2.

[0069] (S3) The composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 was coated on a surface of a poly tetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) plate at 0.2 g/cm.sup.2, and cured at 55° C. for 2 h. The composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 was removed from the PTFE plate.

[0070] (S4) The composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 obtained in step (S3) was superimposed with the PLA fabric, and rolled at 0.6 MPa and 40 rpm by using a padder. The rolled composite was dried at 55° C. to a constant weight, so as to obtain the composite PLA+(PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1).

[0071] In conclusion, the other steps of the preparation process in Comparative Example 1 were the same as those in Example 2 except that the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 was thermal cured first and then placed on the surface of the PLA fabric for rolling, that is, the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 is not solidified on the surface of the PLA fabric, so that there is no hydrogen-bond interaction between the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 and the PLA fabric in the composite PLA+(PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1). In Example 2, the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 was thermal cured on the surface of PLA fabric and then rolled, so that there is hydrogen-bond interaction between the composite PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 and the PLA fabric in the composite PLA/PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1.The composite PLA+(PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1) had a tensile strength of 1.73 MPa and a water absorption rate of 38.62 g/g, and contained 11.03 wt. % of element N, 1.03 wt. % of element P (in P.sub.2O.sub.5) and 21.37 wt. % of element K (in K.sub.2O).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2

[0072] Provided herein was a composite PLA/PAAcs+KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1, which was prepared through the following steps.

[0073] (S1) Formaldehyde and urea were added into an airtight first reaction vessel to obtain a mixed solution, where a molar ratio of formaldehyde to urea was 1:2. The mixed solution was adjusted to pH 8 and reacted at 40° C. for 2 h to obtain a MU solution. KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 was added into the MU solution, where a weight ratio of KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 to the MU solution was 1:20. The mixed solution was heated to 60° C. and reacted to obtain a white solid. The white solid was kneaded and extruded, dried at 80° C. and ground to 300 mesh to obtain KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF powder.

[0074] (S2) AA was added into an airtight second reaction vessel, adjusted with KOH to neutralization of 80%, and added with pre-treated CS and an ammonium persulfate solution, where a weight ratio of AA to CS to ammonium persulfate was 100:10:0.3. The mixed solution was heated to 55° C. and reacted for 2 h to obtain viscous PAA.sub.CS.

[0075] (S3) The viscous PAA.sub.CS obtained in step (S2) was mixed with the KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF powder, where a weight ratio of AA to the MU solution was 1:1. The mixture was mechanically stirred to be uniform to obtain a composite (PAA.sub.CS+KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1).

[0076] (S4) The composite (PAA.sub.CS+KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1) obtained in step (S3) was coated on a surface of the PLA fabric at 0.2 g/cm.sup.2, cured at 55° C. for 2 h, rolled at 0.6 MPa and 40 rpm by using a padder and dried at 55° C. to a constant weight, so as to obtain the composite PLA/PAA.sub.CS+KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1.

[0077] The composite PLA/PAA.sub.CS+KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 had a tensile strength of 1.95 MPa and a water absorption rate of 18.6 g/g, and contained 11.03 wt. % of element N, 1.03 wt. % of element P (in P.sub.2O.sub.5) and 21.37 wt. % of element K (in K.sub.2O).

[0078] As shown in FIG. 1, compared to Comparative Example 1, a stretching vibration peak of carbonyl group (—C═O) in the molecular chain of PLA fabric of Example 2 showed an obvious red shift, indicating that there is intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 and the PLA fabric, which enhanced the interfacial bonding strength therebetween.

[0079] As shown in FIG. 2, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 2 had the greatest tensile strength (2.66 MPa) due to an appropriate acrylic acid (AA)/methylol urea (MU) ratio, followed by the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 1 (2.42 MPa); and the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 3 had the lowest tensile strength (0.7 MPa). All of these results revealed that the AA/MU ratio could significantly affect the mechanical properties of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material. Compared to the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1 and 2 had a significantly-enhanced tensile strength, which was attributed to the great bonding strength between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric. The bonding strength therebetween was larger than the breaking strength of the biodegradable polymer fabric (0.3 MPa).

[0080] As shown in FIG. 3, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 2 was predominant in the water absorption capacity (41.59 g/g), which was attributed to an appropriate ratio between components, indicating the ratio of components had a significant effect on the water absorption capacity of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material. It was observed that the water absorption capacity of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Example 2 was slightly higher than that of the composite prepared in Comparative Example 1, which was attributed to the enhanced interfacial bonding strength brought by the intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric. Therefore, Example 2 can keep structurally complete when swelling.

[0081] As shown in FIG. 4, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 all had a porous structure and rough surface, which facilitated the water absorption. The biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared in Example 2 had more uniform and stronger pores, allowing for the best water absorption capacity.

[0082] FIG. 5 showed the wind erosion curves in the presence and absence of a cylindrical sand-protecting barrier. The cylindrical sand-protecting barrier was a cylindrical sand-protecting barrier fabricated by the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material prepared in Example 2, in which sand were filled. It was observed that the cylindrical sand-protecting barrier can obviously relieve the wind erosion loss, and the sand retention rate after wind erosion was increased from 7% (no sand-protecting barrier) to 55%. In conclusion, the sand-protecting barrier fabricated by the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material provided herein contributed to a higher sand retention rate.

[0083] As shown in FIG. 6, the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer materials prepared in Examples 1-3 and the composites prepared in Comparative Examples 1-2 all exhibited excellent slow release of N and P, in which Example 2 was the best. Regarding the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material of Example 2, after being placed in sand for 30 days, 67.12% of N and 81.98% of P were released. The sand-fixing polymer material of Example 2 was superior to the composite of Comparative Example 1 in the nutrient slow-release property because there was intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric. The intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction greatly enhanced the interfacial bonding strength between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer fabric, contributing to a better nutrient slow-release property.

[0084] As shown in FIG. 7, due to the appropriate AA/MU ratio, the sand-fixing polymer material of Example 2 had the highest water-holding capacity (103.87%). Regarding the sand-fixing polymer material of Example 3, due to the lower level of the water-absorbing component AA, it had the lowest water-holding capacity (73.61%). The water-holding capacity of the composite of Comparative Example 1 was lower than that of the sand-fixing polymer material of Example 2 because the interfacial bonding strength between the PAA.sub.CS/KH.sub.2PO.sub.4/UF-1 and the PLA fabric in Comparative Example 1 was weak owing to no hydrogen bond interaction between its two phases, and the polymer material was partially carried away by water. It could be concluded that the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material provided herein possessed good water-holding capacity.

[0085] As shown in FIG. 8, the sand-fixing polymer material of Example 2 had the best water retention capacity, and there was still 0.21% (relative to the original water content) water in the corresponding sand sample after being placed at room temperature for 30 days. By comparison, there was no water left in the sand sample added with the composite of Comparative Example 1 on day 27. It can be summarized that the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material provided herein had better water-retention capacity, and can absorb and store water when raining.

[0086] Described above are only some embodiments of the present disclosure, which are not intended to limit the disclosure. It should be understood that any modifications and replacements made by those of ordinary skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the disclosure shall fall within the scope of the disclosure defined by the appended claims.