Allocation of calls in a lift installation
09556001 ยท 2017-01-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B66B1/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B2201/211
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B1/2458
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B2201/104
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B2201/222
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B2201/103
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66B1/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B66B1/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method of allocating calls of a lift installation with at least one lift and at least one car per lift to move passengers in a journey from at least one input floor to at least one destination floor, a system for executing the method and a computer readable memory with instructions for executing the method. The method includes receiving input calls from passengers travelling from an input floor to a destination floor, each call identifying at least one floor as an input floor or a destination floor. A start zone with identified input floors and a destination zone with identified destination floors are determined from the input calls and destination calls. Each identified floor within a corresponding zone is considered using at least one selection criterion and a stopping floor is selected which satisfies the criterion. The car is caused to stop at fewer than all the identified input floors and identified destination floors during the journey.
Claims
1. A computer implemented lift installation operation method, comprising: determining, using a computer having at least one central processing unit including at least one processor configured to execute instructions stored on at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium, a start zone in a building which identifies input building floors in at least one destination call; determining, by the computer processor executing the instructions, a destination zone in the building which identifies at least one destination building floor in the at least one destination call; selecting, using the computer processor executing the instructions, a stopping floor from the start zone of floors or from the destination zone of floors, the selecting of the stopping floor being based on a selection criterion; and transporting the car of a lift installation between the start zone and the destination zone by omitting a stop for at least one of the input building floors or at least one of the destination building floors.
2. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, further comprising communicating to one of the passengers to exit the car at a floor other than a destination building floor identified in a destination call inputted by the passenger.
3. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, further comprising communicating to one of the passengers to enter the car at a floor other than an input building floor identified in a destination call inputted by the passenger.
4. The lift installation operation method of claim 3, communicates to the one of the passengers being performed using a destination call input terminal.
5. The lift installation operation method of claim 3, communicates to the one of the passengers being performed before the passenger enters the car.
6. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising passenger identification.
7. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising a predefined input floor.
8. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising a number of inputted destination calls.
9. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising a lowest floor difference.
10. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising a floor number.
11. The lift installation operation method of claim 1, the selection criterion comprising a substitute cost.
12. A non-transitory computer readable memory programmed storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, configure the processor to perform operations comprising: determining, for a lift journey by the processor executing the instructions, a start zone in a building, the start zone comprising input building floors identified in destination calls inputted by two or more passengers; determining, for the lift journey by the processor executing the instructions, a destination zone in the building, the destination zone comprising destination building floors identified in the destination calls; selecting, by the processor executing the instructions, a stopping floor from the start zone of floors or from the destination zone of floors, the selecting of the stopping floor being based on a selection criterion; and transporting, responsive to said determining and selecting by the processor executing the instructions, the two or more passengers in a car of a lift installation between the start zone and the destination zone during the lift journey, the transporting comprising omitting a stop at at least one of the input building floors or at least one of the destination building floors.
13. A computer implemented lift installation operating method, comprising: receiving, using a destination call input terminal, a destination call for a passenger, the destination call being associated with an indicated departure floor in a building and with an indicated destination floor in the building; determining, using a computer having at least one central processing unit including at least one processor configured to execute instructions stored on the at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium, a start zone of floors in the building and a destination zone of floors in the building; and selecting a stopping floor based on selection criteria and stopping the lift car at fewer than the identified input floors and the identified destination floors.
14. The lift installation operating method of claim 13, further comprising instructing the passenger to board the lift car at the floor other than the indicated departure floor comprising: displaying travel data for traveling from the indicated departure floor to the floor other than the indicated departure floor.
15. The lift installation operating method of claim 13, further comprising instructing the passenger to exit the lift car at the floor other than the indicated destination floor comprising: displaying travel data for traveling from the floor other than the indicated destination floor to the indicated destination floor.
16. The lift installation operating method of claim 13, further comprising communicating state data of the lift installation to the passenger.
17. The lift installation operating method of claim 16, the state data of the lift installation comprising an indication of a floor at which the lift car will not stop during a lift trip.
18. The lift installation operating method of claim 16, the state data of the lift installation comprising an indication that a lift trip from the indicated departure floor to the indicated destination floor will be available later.
19. The lift installation operating method of claim 13, further comprising determining a substitute cost for the indicated departure floor or the indicated destination floor.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the invention are explained in detail with reference to the figures, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
(6)
(7) A lift control 4 comprises at least one processor, at least one computer readable data memory and at least one electrical power supply. During operation, a computer program is executed, for example, by being loaded from the computer readable data memory into the processor and executed. The control computer program controls the movement of the cars 1, 1 by way of lift drives and the opening and closing of the lift doors by way of door drives. The lift control 4 obtains data about the instantaneous position of the cars 1, 1 in the lift shafts from the shaft sensors. A person of ordinary skill in the art can realise the present invention in any lift installations with substantially more lifts, such as a group with six or eight lifts; with double and triple cars; with several cars, which are arranged one above the other and movable independently of one another, per lift shaft; with lifts without counterweight, with hydraulic lifts; etc.
(8)
(9) According to
(10) According to
(11) The mobile apparatus 83 is carried by the passenger and is, for example, a mobile telephone and/or a computer with at least one transmitting/receiving device. The mobile apparatus 83 includes a processor, a computer readable data memory and an electrical power supply. A computer program is loaded from the computer readable data memory into the processor and executed. The communications computer program controls the transmission and reception of the transmitting/receiving device.
(12) The terminal 8, as well as the mobile apparatus 83, are connected or connectible with the lift control 4 by way of data lines by a fixed network or radio network. In the embodiment of
(13) According to
(14) Known mobile telephone radio networks such as Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) at frequencies of 900 to 1900 MHz can be used, but use can also be made of Nearfield Communication (NFC) radio networks. Known radio networks are Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) according to the standard IEEE 802.11 or Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WIMAX) according to the standard IEEE 802.16 for the range of several hundreds of metres up to several tens of kilometres. The radio frequency employed by the radio network is, in the case of a WLAN, for example in the 2.4 GHz band or in the 5.0 GHz band and in the case WIMAX in the 10 to 66 GHz band. Not only the fixed network, but also the radio network allow a bidirectional communication according to known and proven network protocols such as the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) or Internet Packet Exchange (IPX). The fixed network comprises, for example, several electrical and/or optical data cables which, for example, are laid in the building to be buried and thus interconnect the terminal 8, the mobile apparatus 83 and the lift control 4.
(15)
(16) At least one operating costs computer program is loaded from the computer readable data memory of the lift control 4 into the processor of the lift control 4 and executed. The operating costs computer program determines the operating costs of a journey with the car 1, 1. From the call data communicated by the terminal, the operating costs computer program composes a journey with the car 1, 1 and lists for this journey the number of destination calls or direction calls per input floor as well as the number of destination calls or car calls per destination floor. According to
(17) The operating costs of the journey from the start zone 9, 9 to the destination zone 10, 10 are minimised by reduction of the number of stops in the start zone 9, 9 and/or in the destination zone 10, 10. At least one stopping floor in the start zone 9, 9 is determined and/or at least one stopping floor in the destination zone 10, 10 is determined
(18) For this purpose, each input floor and/or each destination floor is analyzed using at least one selection criterion by the operating costs computer program in the method step B. The selection criteria can be called up from a data memory.
(19) The selection criterion is determined by the operating costs computer program in method step C. Several selection criteria are explained in detail below:
(20) Number of callsThe number of input calls per input floor and/or destination floor may serve as selection criterion. Thus, the input floor and/or destination floor with the highest number of input calls may be selected as a stopping floor. This selection criterion determines the smallest number of floor changes the passengers have to undertake. According to
(21) Lowest total floor differenceThe total of the floor difference of the input floors from one another and/or the floor difference of the destination floors from one another may also serve as selection criterion. In that case the input floor with the lowest total floor difference from the other input floors and/or the destination floor with the lowest total floor difference from the other destination floors may be selected as the stopping floor. This approach does not take into account the direction of travel between floors. This selection criterion determines the shortest route which the passengers must cover. According to
(22) Lowest relative floor differenceThe total floor difference of the input floors from one another and/or the destination floors from one another may also serve as selection criterion taking into account the direction of travel between floors. In that case, the input floor with the lowest floor difference from the other input floors and/or the destination floor with the lowest floor difference from the other destination floors is selected as the stopping floor. This selection criterion determines the smallest ascent in the building the passengers have to cover. It is thus taken into consideration that passengers rather prefer to go down stairs in the building (negative floor difference) than up (positive floor difference). According to
(23) Lowest or highest floor numberThe number of the floors of the start zone 9, 9 and/or in the destination zone 10, 10 may also serve as selection criterion. This selection criterion is based on the assumption that most passengers are located in the floor with the lowest floor number and/or in the floor with the highest floor number. In addition, passengers rather prefer to go down stairs in the building than up. In the case of upward journeys the input floor with the lowest floor number and/or the destination floor with the highest floor number is or are selected as the stopping floor. In the case of downward journeys the input floor with the highest floor number and/or the destination floor with the lowest floor number may be selected as stopping floor. According to
(24) Second-lowest or second-highest floor numberThe number of the floors again serves as selection criterion. This time the selection criterion is based on the assumption that the most passengers are located in the floor with the second-lowest floor number and/or in the floor with the second-highest floor number.
(25) Lowest building floor differenceThe floor difference between the input floors and the destination floors may also serve as selection criterion. The input floor and the destination floor with the lowest floor difference from one another are selected as stopping floors. This selection criterion is based on the assumption that the lower the building floor difference, the more rapidly the journey of the car 1, 1 takes place. According to
(26) Predefined input floorAccording to this selection criterion a predefined input floor and/or destination floor may be selected as stopping floor.
(27) Floor substitute costsThe level of the substitute costs of an input floor and/or destination floor, which is not a selected stopping floor, may also serve as selection criterion. With this criterion, the system is prevented from consistently neglecting, i.e. not choosing, certain input or destination floors as stopping floors. Accordingly, the input floor and/or destination floor with the greatest substitute costs over a certain length of time may be determined and selected as a stopping floor. Alternatively, the input floor and/or destination floor that has reached a threshold value of substitute costs can be determined and selected as a stopping floor. This selection criterion is based on the approach that all floors are, as far as possible, to be allocated the same substitute costs. The time unit is freely selectable and amounts to, for example, a week. The threshold value is similarly freely divisible and amounts to, for example, a fifth of the floor number of the building.
(28) Passenger identificationPassenger identifications of the passengers can also be used as selection criterion. The determined passenger identifications are compared with a values list. Passenger identifications can be input by the passenger at the terminal 8 by actuation of buttons of the call input device 81. However, passenger identifications can also be contactlessly detected by reading out from the computer readable data memory of the mobile apparatus 82, 83. Other technical passenger identification determination possibilities, such as recognition of biometric data of the passenger and/or scanning of identity means of the passenger, are equally usable. A passenger identification having the greatest value according to the values list is determined The input floor and/or the destination floor, which has the call of the passenger with the passenger identification of greatest value, is selected as the stopping floor. For example, a VIP identification and/or a handicapped-person identification of a passenger may be determined as passenger identification. According to the values list the presence of a VIP identification and/or handicapped-person identification is allocated greater value than is the non-presence of a VIP identification and/or handicapped-person identification. If several input floors and destination floors have a call of a passenger with VIP identification and/or handicapped-person identification, these input floors and/or destination floors can each be selected as stopping floors.
(29) Substitute costsA sum of the substitute costs, which are collected over a certain time, of a passenger may be determined as passenger identification. According to a values list the greatest sum of the substitute costs, which are collected during a time unit, of a passenger is allocated the greatest value. Thus, the floors selected as stopping floors may be determined to favour a person who has collected a large sum of substitute costs over a certain time. This selection criterion is based on the approach that all passengers shall, as far as possible, bear the same substitute costs. The time unit is freely selectable and amounts to, for example, a week. Passengers who in a week collect relatively high substitute costs to say cover much travel by way of stairs and/or escalators to selected stopping floors, are, in accordance with the values list, compensated for that in a following week.
(30) RandomAccording to this selection criterion a random input floor and/or destination floor may be selected as the stopping floor.
(31) With knowledge of the present invention it is freely available to a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine several of these selection criteria together to form a selection criterion and/or use several of these selection criteria in any sequence in succession.
(32) At least one input floor and/or at least one destination floor, which best fulfils the particular selection criterion, may be selected as the stopping floor in method step D. The operating costs computer program works down at least one or more selection criteria according to the predetermined calls at the input floors and/or destination floors and selects an optimum stopping floor in a journey-specific manner.
(33) In method step E on the one hand the operating costs of the journey from the start zone to the destination zone and on the other hand the operating costs of the journey by way of the selected stopping floor are determined by the operating costs computer program. The operating costs are the journey costs of the lift installation during movement of the passengers. The minimisation of the stops in the start zone and/or in the destination zone is thus quantified on the side of the lift installation.
(34) In method step F difference costs are determined by the operating costs computer program in that the difference of the operating costs of the journey from the start zone to the destination zone and the operating costs of the journey by way of the selected stopping floor is formed.
(35) In method step G there is determined, by the operating costs computer program, for each input floor and/or for each destination floor which is not a selected stopping floor substitute costs from this input floor to the selected stopping floor of the start zone 9, 9 and/or from this destination floor to the selected stopping floor of the destination zone 10, 10. Total substitute costs are determined for all input floors and/or for all destination floors which are not a selected stopping floor. Substitute costs are the travel costs which arise for the passengers in order to go from the input floor and/or destination floor to a selected stopping floor. The minimisation of the stops in the start zone 9, 9 and/or in the destination zone 10, 10 is thus quantified at the passenger side.
(36) The total substitute costs are compared with the difference costs by the operating costs computer program in method step H. If the total substitute costs are greater than the difference costs at least one further stopping floor is selected. Otherwise, the car 1, 1 is moved to the selected stopping floor (Step I).
(37) While there have been shown and described particular features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.