Sustained release capsules
09555225 ยท 2017-01-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61D7/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61J3/07
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/4808
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61M31/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61D7/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/48
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The invention relates to an intraruminal sustained release capsule which is capable of delivering a sustained release dose of a first medicament to an animal, as well as either or both of a dump dose of a second medicament or mineral, and an exit dose of a third medicament or mineral. The capsule can have a dissolvable overcap molded from plasticized starch enabling a dump dose of medicament to be held between the overcap and one end of the capsule. A piston within the body of the capsule can be modified to enable it to accommodate an exit dose of medicament within its hollow interior which is aligned with an aperture at the end of the capsule which enables release of the medicaments to the rumen. After insertion of the capsule in the animal the overcap (if present) dissolves and separates from the capsule to release the dump dose of medicament. The sustained release medicament is then dispensed via the apertured end, followed by the release of the exit dose of medicament (if present).
Claims
1. A sustained release capsule comprising a hollow tubular body sealed at a first end, a movable piston within the body, a spring biasing the piston towards a second end of the body, an apertured cover at the second end to define a first chamber between the movable piston and the apertured cover capable of containing a first dose of material within the hollow tubular body for subsequent sustained release through the apertured cover into a rumen of an animal; wherein an overcap is releasably attached to the device at one end thereof to form a void between an end of the device and the overcap capable of containing a second dose of material within the void so that in use the second dose of material is delivered to the rumen when the overcap is breached or detaches from the device; wherein the capsule contains the second dose of material as a dump dose within the overcap, and the first dose of material as a sustained release dose within the body of the capsule; and wherein the movable piston has an end face facing towards the first dose, a hollow central sleeve extending rearwardly from the end face to assist in locating a spring, an aperture in the end face into the hollow interior of the central sleeve, the central sleeve having a closed portion distal from the end face to create a void capable of containing an exit dose of material.
2. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the overcap is releasably attached to the device by a dissolvable attachment.
3. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the overcap is made of a material which will dissolve or breakup in the rumen.
4. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the overcap is made of a material selected from the group consisting of cellulosic fibre, cardboard, paper, a water soluble plastics material and starch.
5. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the body has at least one external protrusion adapted in use to assist in retaining the capsule in the rumen of an animal.
6. The sustained release capsule of claim 5, wherein the at least one protrusion consists of a pair of foldable wings.
7. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the capsule is loaded with a first dose of material.
8. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the capsule is loaded with a second dose of material in the overcap.
9. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the capsule is loaded with an exit dose of material.
10. The sustained release capsule of claim 1, wherein the second dose of material in the overcap comprises copper needles.
11. A sustained release capsule comprising a hollow tubular body sealed at a first end, a movable piston within the body, a spring biasing the piston towards a second end of the body, an apertured cover at the second end to define a first chamber between the movable piston and the apertured cover capable of containing a first dose of material within the hollow tubular body for subsequent sustained release through the apertured cover into a rumen of an animal, wherein the movable piston has an end face facing towards the first dose, a hollow central sleeve extending rearwardly from the end face to assist in locating a spring, an aperture in the end face into the hollow interior of the central sleeve, the central sleeve having a closed portion distal from the end face to create a void capable of containing an exit dose of material, and wherein an overcap is releasably attached to the device at one end thereof to form a void between an end of the device and the overcap capable of containing a second dose of material within the void so that in use the second dose of material is delivered to the rumen when the overcap is breached or detaches from the device.
12. The sustained release capsule of claim 11, wherein the capsule contains the second dose of material as a dump dose within the overcap, and the first dose of material as a sustained release dose within the body of the capsule.
Description
DRAWINGS
(1) These and other aspects of this invention, which should be considered in all its novel aspects, will become apparent from the following description, which is given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(19) The following description will describe the invention in relation to preferred embodiments of the invention, namely a sustained release capsule.
(20) The invention is in no way limited to these preferred embodiments as they are purely to exemplify the invention only and it should be understood that possible variations and modifications which would be readily apparent are intended to be included without departing from the scope of the invention.
(21) There are two aspects to the current invention. The first aspect addresses the need to provide a priming dose capability for a sustained release capsule, while the second aspect addresses the need to provide the exit dose capability.
(22) Priming Dose
(23) The first preferred embodiments of this invention are designed to achieve an outcome whereby a secondary treatment formulation can be mounted with the sustained release device without requiring modifications to the geometry of the device that would impede subsequent payout from the sustained release portion. This is achieved by holding the secondary treatment, which could be in the form of a liquid, powder, fine particles or tablets under a releasable or detachable overcap mounted on one end of the device. This overcap is able to be constructed of moulded fibre, cardboard or preferably a biodegradable starch material and would serve the purpose of protecting the secondary treatment during storage and transport.
(24) Because the overcap would rapidly detach from the capsule once it was in the rumen it would leave the basic geometry of the sustained release capsule unchanged. Preferably the release of the overcap results from the rumen fluid causing the material of the cap to dissolve and/or biodegrade. However, in other embodiments of the invention the overcap can be made of a material that is more durable and is attached to the capsule by a soluble tape or the like, such that the release of the overcap results from the rumen fluid causing the soluble tape to dissolve and/or biodegrade. In this case the more durable material is likely to be made of a material which will eventually biodegrade inside the animal even if it biodegrades at a slower rate than the soluble tape.
Example 1
(25)
(26) The capsule 100 is shown in side elevation in
(27) The capsule 100 and foldable wings 101 may be of a generally conventional construction having a moveable piston inside the body of the capsule 100, and as shown in
(28) With the exception of the overcap 110 and its attachment to the capsule 100, the other components of the capsule device 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, and 105 can be of conventional sustained release capsule construction.
(29) In this embodiment of the invention the novel feature is the provision of an overcap 110, which is preferably made of a mouldable starch material, and which is of a sufficient shape and size so as to fit snugly over the end face 104 of the capsule, and clip over the sealing rib 109. Thus the diameter of the overcap 110 is only slightly greater than the diameter of the capsule body 100. The overcap 110 preferably has a rounded nose and rounded end, so as not to provide any obstruction or discomfort when the device is swallowed by the animal being treated.
(30) The moulded overcap 110 is of such a size and shape so as to provide a void 120 between the closed end 104 of the capsule and the inside edges of the overcap, the void being for the inclusion of a dump dose of a medicament. The medicament might be in the form of a specially formulated tablet which is designed for rapid release in the rumen once the overcap has been dissolved or detached or otherwise breached by the rumen fluid, or it might be a collection of copper oxide needles or particles, or any other dose which is to be administered to the animal prior to the release of the sustained release pay load contained within the void 102 in the body of the capsule. In some cases the dump dose medicament might be a fast acting anthelmintic, to flush out any adult parasites, whilst the medicament in the sustained release portion of the device consists of a long acting anthelmintic designed to treat the immature and juvenile parasites. Of course many other combinations are possible.
(31) Prior to administration of the capsule, the wings 101 will be folded down and attached to the sides of the capsule 100. As shown in
(32) By modifying the properties of the starch the overcap 110 can be dissolved by the rumen fluid, and depending upon the size and thickness of the overcap, the overcap will then start to jellify, and detach from the body of the capsule 100. In the most preferred form of the invention, the overcap 110 is designed to detach from the body of the capsule, as the wall thickness of the overcap is thinner adjacent the screw threaded portion 108 of the end portion of the capsule. However it is possible that the overcap could be designed to be breached in other portions or areas before actually detaching, so that the dump dose of medicament can be quickly released into the rumen even if the overcap has not itself been detached from the capsule body.
(33) Once the dump dose of medicament has been released either by the cap detaching, or the cap being breached, rumen fluid can then enter the aperture 107 of the capsule body, and the sustained release payload contained in the void 102 will start being dispensed as it is dissolved by the rumen fluid. During this time the moveable piston 105 is biased towards the stack of tablets or capsules or other medicament contained within the void 102, and as the medicament dissolves the piston moves towards the closed end 104 of the capsule.
Example 2
(34)
(35) The capsule 200 is shown in side elevation in
(36) It is noted that in Examples 1 and 2 the overcap prevents any rumen fluid from entering the aperture 107 or 207 until the overcap has been detached from the end of the capsule device, or until the overcap has been breached and the dump dose of medicament has been released.
(37) Preferred Materials
(38) In the preferred embodiments of the invention, the overcap is made entirely of an acceptable dissolvable material such as potato or corn starch (e.g. Plastarch) or alternatively Polylactide acid (e.g. Cereplast Compostables material). Pure starch possesses the characteristic of being able to absorb moisture and is thus ideally suited for this application. Flexibilisers and/or plasticisers such as sorbitol and glycerine may be added to the starch so that the starch can be injection molded into the desired shape.
(39) Upon contact with the rumen fluids the overcap will begin to gellify and become to detached from the capsule. Once the overcap is detached, the dump dose of medicament located within or underneath the overcap is released into the rumen.
(40) The capsule 100 or 200 and wings 101 or 201 and end closure 104 or 204 can all be moulded of a suitable plastics material.
(41) Advantages of the Dump Dose Configurations
(42) The use of the plasticised starch material for the overcap has a secondary and unexpected benefit in that it develops a slippery surface on contact with saliva/mouth moisture, which can aid passage of the capsule down the oesophagus of the animal when treated.
(43) The thickness of the walls of the overcap can be adjusted in order to alter the time taken to separate the overcap from the capsule device.
(44) The fact that the overcap can become entirely separated from the capsule means that there is no interaction or interference with the dynamics of release of the sustained release medicament from the body of the capsule.
(45) Variations of the Dump Dose Configurations Include:
(46) Anthelmintic release devicesa primary dose of one or more active ingredients is formulated in one or more tablets. This dose is stored under the overcap. The overcap is mounted at the opening end of the capsule. Within the capsule body is a plurality of tablets or a stack of tablets containing a sustained release formulation of one or more anthelmintics.
(47) Mineralised capsulesin which a primary dose of copper oxide wire particles is stored under the overcap. Once again the overcap is mounted at the opening end of the capsule. Within the capsule body is a plurality of tablets or a stack of tablets containing a sustained release formulation of one or more minerals such as selenium and cobalt.
(48) It should be recognised that there are many combinations and permutations of medicaments that are capable of being used with this invention. For example the overcap may contain any number of individual materials each having a different biological effect.
(49) It is also possible that the overcap could be constructed of other types of material such as cardboard or plastic. The overcap could be attached to the capsule by means of a clip or alternatively by water soluble adhesive tape or some other non-permanent attaching means.
(50) One such variation could be the use of an overcap made of cardboard or plastic which is secured to the end of the capsule body by means of the same dissolvable tape used to hold the wings in place. In another version the wings may well have a provision which clips into the cardboard or plastic overcap, and the wings are then held in place by a dissolvable tape so that once the tape has been released, the movement of the wings will cause the plastic or cardboard overcap to be detached from the dump dose body.
(51) Although the preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the overcap fitting over the closed end of the capsule, i.e. at the end distant from the attachment of the wings, it will be appreciated that the overcap could be positioned at the same end of the capsule where the wings are attached.
(52) In such an arrangement, the wings will be folded down prior to administration of the capsule to the animal, in the position shown in
(53) Although such a modified overcap and its dump dose payload would be able to be released into the rumen shortly after the insertion of the capsule into the animal, this arrangement is less advantageous, in that the overcap no longer covers the aperture leading to the sustained release payload. This means that the sustained release payload may start to be released possibly before the overcap is released from the capsule. Thus it will be appreciated that having the overcap 410 on the end of the capsule as shown in
(54) Many other variations are possible.
(55) Exit Dose
(56) It is also desirable for a sustained release capsule to include an exit dose that can be released at the conclusion of the sustained release payout period instead of, or as well as, the dump dose. If the capsule is used to release a medicament such as an anthelmintic over a long period, the exit dose would preferably be in the form of a larger immediate release of anthelmintic sufficient to kill any parasites that may have survived the low level of sustained release of anthelmintic. However there are practical problems with achieving this desired embodiment.
(57) Just as there are difficulties in providing for a priming dose within the body of the capsule the same basic problems are present when including an exit dose. Because the fast release exit tablet must be constructed of a more soluble formulation than the sustained release tablets this can result in the release of the anthelmintic drug through the matrix of the sustained release medicament or tablet stack before it is meant to be released. There is also an additional problem of how to fit such an exit dose into the device when it is desired to include as much medicament or as many sustained release tablets into the capsule as possible.
(58) To address these issues, the next embodiment of the invention allows for the inclusion of an exit dose of medicament in a modified piston covering the end of the spring within the capsule device. Current sustained release capsules fitted with a spring have a flat faced piston (which serves as the spring cover). This cover contacts the face of the last sustained release tablet within the tablet stack inside the capsule. There is however a void space within the inner diameter of the spring behind the spring cover. This space is currently not utilised for any practical purpose.
Example 3
(59)
(60) The capsule 300 is shown in side elevation in
(61) Inside the capsule device 300 there is a modified moveable piston, indicated generally at 305 of
(62) The moveable piston 305 is shown in more detail in
(63)
(64) When the moveable piston 305 reaches the end face 304 as shown in
(65) Typically the exit dose 331 will be a fast release tablet, which dissolves more quickly than the sustained release formulations of the payload 330 in the body of the capsule, and hence the material of the exit dose will be released quickly into the rumen.
(66) Because the exit dose 331 is stored within a chamber 316 in the modified piston, it does not add to the length of the capsule, and this exit dose configuration can also work with the dump dose configuration of examples 1 and 2.
Example 4
(67)
(68) Both
(69)
(70)
(71) Dimensions:
(72) The device of
(73)
(74) Of course many other variations are possible, and the size and in particular the length of the device may depend upon the payload and the design time of the payout of the payload.
(75) Advantages of the Exit Dose Configuration (Example 3 and the Combined Configuration of Example 4)
(76) By designing the piston to include a well shaped portion projecting rearward from the face that contacts the last sustained release tablet, a suitable repository can be created to contain an exit dose of medicament.
(77) The well shaped portion has an additional advantage to merely creating a suitable repository for the exit dose material. That is, it also concentrates the exit dose material at the centre of the tablet stack where it is aligned with the aperture 407 once the capsule has paid out the sustained release tablet stack portion 430. Because each tablet in the sustained release tablet stack 430 tends to collapse and gellify from the centre portion immediately adjacent the aperture 407 first, this makes it highly desirable that the exit dose medicament is also aligned with this point. This means that even if the last sustained release tablet is not completely paid out the exit dose 431 will still be cleanly and effectively released.
(78) Because the modified piston 405 does not impede significantly on the interior volume of the capsule, it is still possible to provide a significant sustained release payload 430 within the body of the capsule and also provide for the provision of an exit dose 431 within the piston 405. Thus the combined capsule of
(79) Variation of the Exit Dose Configuration
(80) Instead of a coil spring, any other resilient means can be used to cause the piston to move towards the exit end of the device.
(81) The modified piston of example 3 can be included in the configurations of examples 1 or 2 so that the device has a dump dose and an exit dose as well as the sustained release payload within the body of the capsule, generally as described in Example 4.
(82) Although it is preferable that the dump dose, the sustained release payload, and the exit dose are formulated differently, it is also possible that this configuration could be used to deliver a longer duration sustained release payload by including a sustained release portion in the dump dose, the main payload itself within the capsule, and also in the cavity within the piston, or some sub-combination of these three possibilities.
(83) Although the four embodiments are described with reference to foldable wings, other forms of protrusions or means for retaining the capsule within the rumen can be used.
(84) Field Study
(85) In order to test the efficacy of the invention a field study was performed in respect of an embodiment of the invention comprising a plasticised starch overcap fitted to a sustained release capsule for sheep, the overcap comprising a dump dose of medicament. This was a single dose, controlled total worm count efficacy study in which the dump dose medicament contained within the overcap on the capsule comprised a combination of abamectin and levamisole, while the sustained release medicament contained within the body of the capsule comprised a combination of abamectin and albendazole designed to be released over a period of 100 days.
(86) An untreated control group, a group treated with an empty capsule fitted with the overcap comprising the dump dose only, and a group treated with a standard abamectin/albendazole sustained release capsule were also included in the study.
(87) Four days prior to treatment, a group of 30 sheep suspected of harbouring a burden of gastrointestinal parasites and weighing between 60 kg-80 kg were selected from a larger mob, ear tagged and faecal sampled for faecal egg count (FEC). From this mob of sheep, 24 animals with positive FEC were selected for inclusion in the study. Animals were introduced to a diet of lucerne chaffage whilst on pasture.
(88) On Day 0 the study animals were removed from pasture, weighed and randomly assigned to 4 groups of n=6 based on individual bodyweight. All animals were faecal sampled for FEC and larval culture and the treatments were administered to animals in Groups 1-3; while Group 4 remained untreated. Animals were retained off pasture for the duration of the study. Treatment groups were: Group 1: Abamectin/albendazole sustained release capsule including an overcap comprising a dump dose of medicament containing abamectin and levamisole Group 2: Empty sustained release capsule with an overcap comprising a dump dose of medicament containing abamectin and levamisole Group 3: Abamectin/albendazole sustained release capsule with no dump dose overcap Group 4: Untreated control
(89) Ten days after treatment, all study animals were faecal sampled for FEC to demonstrate faecal egg count reduction and confirm control group worm burdens. A larval culture was performed on pooled faeces from Group 4. The following day, all animals were necropsied and the abomasa, small and large intestines were collected for total worm counts. Individual capsules were recovered from treated animals in Groups 1 and 3 and measured to determine release kinetics. Capsules fitted with the overcap containing the dump dose of medicament (Groups 1 and 2) were examined to ensure the housing and tablet had detached correctly.
(90) Results
(91) Performance of the Overcap Containing the Dump Dose of Medicament
(92) Performance of the overcap containing the dump dose of medicament was measured by the ability of the actives in the overcap (abamectin/levamisole) to reduce worm burdens in the animals. This was principally demonstrated by comparing the result from Group 2 with the other treatment Groups.
(93) Total Worm Counts:
(94) Mean total worm count results are shown in Tables 1a, 1b and 1c. The control group harboured a mixed burden of gastrointestinal nematodes, evident from the total worm count results.
(95) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1a Arithmetic and geometric mean total worm counts - Abomasum Haemonchus Ostertagia/ Trichostron- contortus Teladorsagia spp. gylus axei Species Imma- Imma- Imma- Stage Adult ture Adult ture Adult ture Arithmetic means Group 1 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 2 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 16.7.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 3 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 4 50.0.sup. 8.3.sup. 1108.3.sup. 16.7.sup. 3850.0 0.0.sup. Geometric means Group 1 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 2 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a 2.7 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 3 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 4 8.6 .sup.b 0.9 .sup.a 614.2 .sup.b 1.2 .sup.a 2943.6 .sup.b 0.0 .sup.a .sup.a, b Subscripts within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05
(96) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1b Arithmetic and geometric mean total worm counts - Small intestine Species Nematodirus spp. Trichostrongylus spp. Cooperia spp. Stage Imma- Imma- Imma- Adult ture Adult ture Adult ture Arithmetic means Group 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0.sup. 0.0 0.0.sup. Group 4 366.7 100.0 1750.0 8.3.sup. 508.6 0.0.sup. Geometric means Group 1 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 2 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 3 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a 0.0 .sup.a Group 4 .sup.93.1 .sup.b .sup.49.1 .sup.b 1582.2 .sup.b 0.9 .sup.a .sup.22.3 .sup.b 0.0 .sup.a .sup.a b Subscripts within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05
(97) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1c Arithmetic and geometric mean total worm counts - Large intestine Species Oesophagostomum spp. Chabertia spp. Trichuris spp. Stage Adult Adult Adult Arithmetic means Group 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Group 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Group 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Group 4 43.3 6.7 23.3 Geometric means Group 1 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a Group 2 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a Group 3 .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a .sup.0.0 .sup.a Group 4 .sup.31.1 .sup.b .sup.2.7 .sup.b .sup.20.5 .sup.b .sup.a b Subscripts within the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05
(98) Percent efficacy (% E) for each group was calculated for each of the worm species (WS) present, using the following formula:
(99)
(100) Percentage efficacies calculated on total worm counts using both arithmetic and geometric means are shown in Table 2a, 2b and 2c.
(101) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2a Percentage efficacies (by genus, based on abomasa Total Worm Counts) Haemonchus Ostertagia/Teladorsagia Trichostrongylus contortus spp axei % Arithmetic Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 Group 2 100 98.5 100 Group 3 100 100 100 % Geometric Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 Group 2 100 99.6 100 Group 3 100 100 100
(102) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 2b Percentage efficacies (by genus, based on small intestinal Total Worm Counts) Nematodirus Nematodirus Trichostrongylus Cooperia spp. Adult spp. Immature spp. spp. % Arithmetic Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 100 Group 2 100 100 100 100 Group 3 100 100 100 100 % Geometric Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 100 Group 2 100 100 100 100 Group 3 100 100 100 100
(103) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 2c Percentage efficacies (by genus, based on large intestinal Total Worm Counts) Oesophagostomum spp. Chabertia spp. Trichuris spp. % Arithmetic Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 Group 2 100 100 100 Group 3 100 100 % Geometric Efficacy Group 1 100 100 100 Group 2 100 100 100 Group 3 100 100 100
Performance of the Sustained Release Medicament within Capsule Body
(104) To ensure that the overcap comprising the dump dose of medicament had no effect on the payout of the sustained release portion of the device, the linear payout of the tablet stack within the device having the dump dose overcap fitted (Group 1) was compared with the linear payout of that from a standard device having no dump dose portion fitted (Group 3). The result was that the mean linear payout for Groups 1 and 3 was 7.85 and 7.91 mm respectively, eleven days after administration. It can therefore be concluded that the overcap quickly detached from the sustained release capsule and that the addition of the dump dose cap element to the sustained release device had no effect on the subsequent linear payout when compared to the standard device, p=0.87.