MISFIT P-TYPE TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE OXIDE (TCO) FILMS, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS

Abstract

A p-type transparent conductive oxide (TCO) mixed metal oxide material layer formed upon a substrate has a formula M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z generally, Ca.sub.xCo.sub.yO.sub.z more specifically, and Ca.sub.3C.sub.o4O.sub.9 most specifically. Embodiments provide that the p-type TCO mixed metal oxide material may be formed absent an epitaxial crystalline relationship with respect to the substrate while using a sol-gel synthesis method that uses a chelating polymer material and not a block copolymer material.

Claims

1. A structure comprising: a substrate; and an at least partially crystalline p-type mixed metal oxide material having a chemical composition M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z and located upon the substrate without an epitaxial crystalline relationship with respect to the substrate.

2. The structure of claim 1 wherein the substrate comprises an optically transparent substrate.

3. The structure of claim 1 wherein: M1 is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkali earth metals and post transition metals that are lighter than radon; M2 is a least one metal selected from the group consisting of transition metals that are lighter than radon; further wherein: when x is normalized to unity y ranges from 0.2 to 5.0, including stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions; and z is determined consistent with x and y, considering oxidation states of M1 and M2.

4. The structure of claim 3 wherein: M1 as an alkali metal is selected from the group consisting of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium; M1 as an alkali earth metal is selected from the group consisting of beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium; M1 as a post transition metal lighter than radon is selected from the group consisting of copper aluminum, bismuth and zinc; and M2 is selected from the group consisting of chromium, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, ruthenium and rhodium.

5. A structure comprising: a substrate; and an at least partially crystalline non-stoichiometric p-type mixed metal oxide material having a chemical composition Ca.sub.xCo.sub.yO.sub.z and located upon the substrate without an epitaxial crystalline relationship with respect to the substrate, wherein: when x is normalized to unity y ranges from about 1.2 to about 1.5; z is selected consistent with x and y, considering the oxidation states of Ca and Co.

6. The structure of claim 5 wherein the substrate comprises an optically transparent substrate.

7. A structure comprising: a substrate; and an at least partially crystalline p-type mixed metal oxide material having a chemical composition Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 and located upon the substrate without an epitaxial crystalline relationship with respect to the substrate.

8. The structure of claim 7 wherein the substrate comprises an optically transparent substrate.

9. The structure of claim 8 wherein: the mixed metal oxide material has an optical transparency in the visible range from about 31 to about 67 percent; and the mixed metal oxide material comprises a misfit crystal material.

10. The structure of claim 9 wherein the mixed metal oxide material shows no more than five peaks in an x-ray diffraction spectrum from 10 to 40 degrees position of 2.

11. A method for preparing a mixed metal oxide material comprising: mixing within a solvent material at least an M1 metal oxide precursor material and an M2 metal oxide precursor material different from the M1 metal oxide precursor material with a chelating polymer material that is not a block copolymer material to provide at least an M1/M2 chelated polymer material; and desolvating and calcining the at least the M1/M2 chelated polymer material to provide a mixed metal oxide material of chemical composition M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the chelating polymer material is selected from the group consisting of polyacrylic chelating polymer materials, polyacrylate chelating polymer materials, polyamine chelating polymer materials, polyammonium chelating polymer materials and polyhydroxyl chelating polymer materials.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein: M1 is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkali earth metals and post transition metals that are lighter than radon; and M2 is a least one metal selected from the group consisting of transition metals that are lighter than radon, wherein: when x is normalized to unity y ranges from 0.2 to 5.0, including stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions; and z is selected consistent with x and y, considering oxidation states of calcium and cobalt.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein: M1 as an alkali metal is selected from the group consisting of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium; M1 as an alkali earth metal is selected from the group consisting of beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium M1 as a post transition metal lighter than radon is selected from the group consisting of copper aluminum, bismuth and zinc; and M2 is selected from the group consisting of chromium, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, ruthenium and rhodium.

15. A method for preparing a mixed metal oxide material comprising: mixing within a solvent material at least a calcium metal oxide precursor material and at least a cobalt metal oxide precursor material with a chelating polymer material that is not a block copolymer material to provide at least a calcium and cobalt chelated polymer material; and desolvating and calcining the calcium and cobalt chelated polymer material to provide a calcium and cobalt mixed metal oxide material of chemical composition Ca.sub.xCo.sub.yO.sub.z wherein: when x is normalized to unity y ranges from 1.2 to 1.5, including non-stoichiometric compositions; and z is selected consistent with x and y, considering oxidation states of calcium and cobalt.

16. A method for preparing a mixed metal oxide material comprising: mixing within a solvent material at least a calcium metal oxide precursor material and at least a cobalt metal oxide precursor material with a chelating polymer material that is not a block copolymer material to provide at least a calcium and cobalt chelated polymer material; and desolvating and calcining the calcium and cobalt chelated polymer material to provide a calcium and cobalt mixed metal oxide material of chemical composition Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the chelating polymer material is selected from the group consisting of polyacrylic chelating polymer materials, polyacrylate chelating polymer materials, polyamine chelating polymer materials, polyammonium chelating polymer materials and polyhydroxyl chelating polymer materials.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein: the mixed metal oxide material has an optical transparency in the visible range from about 31 to about 67 percent; the mixed metal oxide material comprises a misfit crystal material.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising coating the desolvated chelated polymer material upon a substrate prior to calcining the desolvated chelated polymer material.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein substrate comprises an optically transparent substrate.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] The objects, features and advantages of the embodiments are understood within the context of the Detailed Description of the Non-Limiting Embodiments, as set forth below. The Detailed Description of the Non-Limiting Embodiments is understood within the context of the accompanying drawings, which form a material part of this disclosure, wherein:

[0023] FIG. 1 shows measurements of a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) thin film of p-type Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 obtained by spin coating and calcination of a viscous resin on a quartz substrate. The figure of merit (FOM) value for the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 TCO thin film is significantly higher than the FOM values of other solution processed p-type TCO thin films in literature and even higher than FOM values of PVD or CVD prepared films. (a) Specular optical transmission of the TCO thin film between photon wavelengths of 250 nm and 3000 nm. The inset camera image at the top left shows the TCO thin film on a paper with printed logos. FOM and sheet resistance (SR in the figure) values for the TCO thin film are 151 M.sup.1 and 5.7 k/sq, respectively. The inset graph at bottom right is in-plane Seebeck measurement of the film, indicating a positive Seebeck coefficient of 41 V/K (p-type conductivity). (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 thin film in (a) showing film thickness of 100 nm. (c) Low (left) and high (right) magnification surface SEM images of the TCO thin film. The film is smooth and homogenous with nanometer scale voids and sparse micrometer scale cracks (left). The length of the nano-plates in the TCO film is 50-100 nm (right).

[0024] FIG. 2 shows sheet resistance, specular optical transmission and FOM values for Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 TCO thin films obtained with different solute concentrations and calcination times. Data points for the solute concentrations of 2.5, 3.1, 3.5, and 4.1 M are represented in color by blue diamond, green triangle, red circle, and black square symbols, respectively (or alternatively by diamond, triangle, circle and square symbols, respectively). (a) Average sheet resistance values were obtained from 12 measurements on each TCO film vs. calcination time. The error bars are based on standard deviation in different sheet resistance values on each TCO film. (b) Average specular optical transmission of the TCO thin films in visible range vs. calcination time. (c) FOM values were calculated based on average sheet resistances and specular optical transmissions in visible range.

[0025] FIG. 3 shows XRD and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) of TCO thin films. (a) XRD for six Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 TCO thin film samples (i-v) and Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 powder (vi). The reference peak positions for Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase are shown with vertical (red or gray) lines. The peak in powder sample (vi) denoted by asterisk (*) is likely to have originated from a CaO impurity. (b) XPS of the top-performing TCO thin film (3.5 M solute conc., 25 min calc.). The Co 2p, O 1s, Ca 2p, and C 1s peaks are evaluated for elemental analysis (indicated by green bands which are light gray in grayscale). XPS is taken on the film surface (upper red curve) and after etching 30 nm into the film (blue curve). Subtracted backgrounds are shown with black curves. Atomic percentages are listed in the inset tables.

[0026] FIG. 4 shows low magnification SEM images of the TCO thin film in the main text FIG. 1. (a) Low magnification cross-sectional image of the TCO thin film showing long range uniformity. (b) Low magnification surface image of the TCO thin film showing the long range smoothness and occasional micron-scale cracks.

[0027] FIG. 5 shows transparent conductive oxide (TCO) thin films of p-type Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 obtained from viscous resin intermediates with different solute concentrations. All of the TCO films in this figure are calcined at 650 C. for 15 minutes. Different solute concentrations of 2.5 M, 3.1 M, 3.5 M and 4.1 M are indicated with blue, green, orange and black colors (i.e., from top bottom) respectively. (a) Optical transmission measurements of the TCO thin films. (b) Camera images showing the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 thin films in (a) on white paper with FOM and sheet resistance (SR) values written under the samples.

[0028] FIG. 6 shows surface SEM images of TCO films made from resins with different solute concentrations. All of the films are calcined at 650 C. for 25 minutes. The thin films are made from resins with solute concentrations of (a) 4.1 M, (b) 3.5 M, (c) 3.1 M and (d) 2.5 M

[0029] FIG. 7 shows cross-sectional SEM images of the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 thin film prepared from 4.1 M solute concentration resin after 15 minutes calcination at 650 C.

[0030] FIG. 8 shows SEM images of two Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 thin films that are calcined for (a) 45 and (b) 135 minutes at 650 C. Both films are prepared from same solute concentration resin. The lowest sheet resistance values measured on the films are 4 k and 1.5 M respectively for (a) and (b).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE NON-LIMITING EMBODIMENTS

[0031] Since the pioneering work on thin films of delafossite CuAlO.sub.2, p-type TCOs have been vigorously researched with the goal of creating invisible circuits. To date, a material with a comparatively high conductivity among p-type TCOs is CuCr.sub.1-xMg.sub.xO.sub.2, with conductivity of 220 S/cm and visible range transparency of 30-40%. However, thin film manufacturing routes in the majority of these studies have been restricted to CVD and PVD techniques. These methods are more expensive and less scalable than solution-based techniques, which are simpler and faster. Solution-based synthesis techniques, so far, have provided only limited success for p-type TCO thin films, with performance hampered by low conductivity, induced from non-uniformity and excessive porosity. Until now, the highest p-type conductivity from solution-based techniques is only 1 S/cm.

[0032] In light of the foregoing, embodiments provide p-type TCO materials that are formed using solution methods, and with enhanced optical transparency within the optical wavelength range.

I. General Considerations and Extensions for p-Type Mixed Metal Oxide TCO Materials

[0033] Although the experimental embodiments as discussed below are described within the context of a specific p-type Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 mixed metal oxide material that may be prepared using a sol-gel method, the embodiments need not necessarily be so limited. Rather the embodiments are generally and prophetically expected to be applicable within the context of a mixed metal oxide material comprising a chemical composition M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z wherein: (1) M1 is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkali earth metals and post transition metals that are lighter than radon; (2) M2 is a least one metal selected from the group consisting of transition metals that are lighter than radon; further wherein: (a) when x is normalized to unity y ranges from 0.2 to 5.0, including stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions; and (b) z is determined consistent with x and y, considering oxidation states of M1 and M2.

[0034] Within the context of the foregoing chemical composition: (1) M1 as an alkali metal includes at least one of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium (to a lesser extent) and cesium (to a lesser extent); (2) M1 as an alkali earth includes at least one of beryllium (to a lesser extent), magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium (to a lesser extent); and (3) M1 as a post transition metal lighter than radon includes at least one of copper aluminum, bismuth and zinc. Similarly, M2 as a transition metal lighter than radon includes at least one of chromium, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, ruthenium and rhodium

[0035] Within the context of the foregoing description the more extended embodiments also consider a method for preparing a mixed metal oxide material including: (1) mixing within a solvent material at least an M1 metal oxide precursor material and at least an M2 metal oxide precursor material with a chelating polymer material and not a block copolymer material to provide at least an M1/M2 chelated polymer material; and (2) subsequently and sequentially desolvating and calcining the M1/M2 chelated polymer material to provide a mixed metal oxide material of chemical composition M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z wherein: (a) M1 is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of alkali metals, alkali earth metals and post transition metals that are lighter than radon; (b) M2 is a least one metal selected from the group consisting of transition metals that are lighter than radon; further wherein: (1) when x is normalized to unity y ranges from 0.2 to 5.0, including stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions; and (2) z is selected consistent with x and y, considering oxidation states of M1 and M2.

[0036] Within the foregoing method M1 and M2 are the same materials as designated above within the context of the related chemical composition material. Within the context of the embodiments, any of several chelating polymers may be used, including but not limited to polyacrylic acid chelating polymers, polyacrylate chelating polymers, polyamine chelating polymers, polyammonium chelating polymers and polyhydroxy chelating polymers. Notable within the embodiments is that the embodiments do not use a chelating block copolymer, or any other type of block copolymer which will otherwise provide for formation of an ordered porous array within an M1.sub.xM2.sub.yO.sub.z chemical composition that results from overall method in accordance with the embodiments.

[0037] Within the embodiments, the mixing of the M1 and M2 starting materials may be undertaken in a solvent including but not limited to an aqueous or an alcoholic solvent to yield a total M1 and M2 concentration from about 0.04 to about 5.0 molar and preferably from about 0.05 to about 5.0 molar. The M1 and M2 starting materials comprise salts including but not limited to halide, nitrate, acetate and sulphate salts of appropriate M1 and M2 starting materials.

[0038] Within the embodiments the desolvating is undertaken at a temperature from about 20 to about 180 degrees centigrade and preferably from about 100 to about 150 degrees centigrade.

[0039] Within the embodiments, the calcining is undertaken at a temperature from about 400 to about 900 degrees centigrade and more preferably from about 550 to about 750 degrees centigrade.

[0040] Within the embodiments under relatively low scanning electron microscopy (SEM) magnification of about 500 to about 2000 fold, a scanning electron microscopy image of a chemical composition in accordance with the embodiments (see, e.g., FIG. 1c (left)) shows a generally smooth sand like surface with some granularity and occasional cracks that occupy less than about 5 area percent of the SEM image surface.

[0041] Within the embodiments, an x-ray diffraction spectrum of a chemical composition in accordance with the embodiments (see, e.g., FIG. 3a) shows no greater than five resonances within a 2 position range of 10 to 40 degrees.

II. Specific Considerations for an Experimentally Embodied Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9p-Type TCO

[0042] In this particular exemplary embodiment, a scalable and cost-effective embodied manufacturing technique is reported for fabricating a nanostructured, p-type TCO thin film of Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9. Homogenous, p-type TCO thin films with 5.7 k/sq sheet resistance (R.sub.s) and 100 nm thickness (t) (corresponding to a conductivity of =1/(R.sub.st)18 S/cm) can be obtained by the embodied simple method that is based on sol-gel chemistry and spin coating. The average visible range optical transparency for the films can be varied from 31% to 67%, with a concomitant change in conductivity. One may observe very high optical transmission in the near infrared region, reaching up to 85% for an embodied most conductive TCO film. Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 is a misfit-layered oxide with two alternating monoclinic subsystems (rock salt-type Ca.sub.2CoO.sub.3 and CdI.sub.2-type CoO.sub.2) that have identical lattice parameters for the a and c axes but different lattice parameters for the b axis. Although Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 has been very well known as a remarkable p-type thermoelectric material, with properties such as high in-plane conductivity (.sub.ab>500 S/cm) and Seebeck coefficient (S.sub.ab>120 VK.sup.1), superior optoelectronic properties of Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 have not been reported previously, and transparent conductivity has not been observed in misfit layered oxides.

[0043] The synthetic method for the transparent conducting thin films of calcium cobalt oxide employs the Pechini method, in which an organic chelating agent dissolves metal precursors in an appropriate solvent. The resulting homogenous liquid solution is then evaporated into a viscous resin that is spun coated on quartz substrates prior to in-furnace calcination. One may modifiy the Pechini method to polymerically entrap the metal ions in aqueous solutions by using poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, average molecular weight=M.sub.w1800) as the chelating agent. Appropriate quantities of PAA, cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate and calcium nitrate tetrahydrate were dissolved in deionized water at room temperature. Concentrations of each of the metal salts in the solution were 0.205 M, providing a Ca to Co ratio of 1:1. The ratio of PAA carboxylate groups to total metal ions is 2:1, resulting in a total solute concentration of 1.23 M, considering the number of PAA monomers and metals salts in the solution. The solution was evaporated at 150 C. with continuous stirring until it reached the desired solute concentration, forming a viscous resin. As the solution was evaporated, it is believed that chelating groups on the ligand stabilize the metal cations in the solution through dipole forces between water molecules and metal ions, and by the physical tangling and cross-linking of polymer chains which can trap both the solvent and cations in a drying sheet of polymer-metal ion complex. The solute concentration in the resin was adjusted by controlling the evaporated solvent volume. Evaporating the solution to 50% 40%, 35%, and 30% of the initial solution volume resulted in total solute concentrations of 2.5, 3.1, 3.5 and 4.1 M (3% error), respectively. The evaporated resin was spin coated on 1 inch diameter polished quartz substrates at 6000 rpm. The solution was injected from a syringe in a continuous stream for <2 seconds onto the quartz substrate. Spin rates lower than 6000 rpm resulted in notably more inhomogeneous resin coatings in terms of transparency and color. In order to eliminate the water content and organic species in the coated films, the samples are baked under vacuum at 80 and 150 C. consecutively for 2 hours each and then in air at 150 C. for another 2 hours. Setting the initial baking temperature to 80 C. prevents rapid outgassing of the water content preventing bubble and crack formation on the coated films. Similarly, the vacuum environment reduces the burning rate of the organic content resulting in slower outgas sing of combustion products. The vacuum environment also speeds the time required for the low temperature outgassing of water. In the second step, the temperature was raised to 150 C. because this temperature is typically needed for outgassing of C content from PAA and N content from metal salts. Introducing air in the last baking step ensures complete burning and outgassing of the remaining N and C content. The resin films were then calcined at 650 C. in a preheated box furnace for 5, 15, 25, or 35 minutes. The samples were covered by crucibles during calcination in order to avoid undesired radiative heating of the sample surface.

[0044] Specular optical transmissions and sheet resistances of calcium cobalt oxide thin films were measured to evaluate the TCO properties. A linear array, four-point probe is used for sheet resistance measurements. Sheet resistances of TCO films were determined by averaging 12 equally spaced measurements along two perpendicular lines passing through the center of the circular sample. The measurements were limited to locations that were within 8 mm from the center of the sample to avoid edge effects. Optical transmission measurements were performed using a Shimadzu UV3600 UV-Vis spectrometer and an Ocean Optics USB2000+VIS-NIR spectrometer, with an uncoated quartz disc used as a reference for these measurements. The optical transmission was measured through a 515 mm rectangular area close to the center of the sample. Optical transmission though two different areas on the same sample were typically within 1% of each other. Because the high optical transmission and electrical conductivity are conflicting properties, the transparent conducting films were evaluated based on their FOM F=1/(R.sub.sln T) where R.sub.s is the sheet resistance and T is the optical transmission..sup.16 One may calculate FOM based on optical transmission in the visible range by averaging transmission values at photon energies of 1.77, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, and 3 eV.

[0045] The highest FOM was found for the TCO thin films of calcium cobalt oxide when a 3.5 M total solute concentration resin is used and the film was calcined for 25 minutes at 650 C. FIG. 1(a) shows the specular optical transmission of the high FOM thin film between photon wavelengths of 200 and 3000 nm. The optical transmission increases with increasing photon wavelength ranging from 8.9% to 53.7% at the lower and higher edges of the visible range (400 and 700 nm, respectively). The optical transmission was significantly enhanced in the near infrared region, reaching up to 85% for photon wavelengths longer than 1.5 m. The film had visibly homogenous transparency with translucent brown color (FIG. 1(a), top left inset). The average photon transmission in the visible range and the sheet resistance (R.sub.s) for the film were 31.3% and 5.7 k/sq, respectively, resulting in a FOM of 151 M.sup.1. Voltage and temperature differences (V and T) were measured between two points on the thin film at room temperature in order to find the Seebeck coefficient (FIG. 1(a), bottom right inset). The temperature difference between the two points was induced by a resistive heater at the hot point while the cold point remained at room temperature. The data points in the V vs. T plot fit to a line (FIG. 1(a), bottom right inset, open black circles and dashed blue line, respectively), with a negative slope indicating a positive Seebeck coefficient of

[00001]$S=-\frac{.Math..Math.V}{.Math..Math.T}41.Math..Math..Math..Math.V.Math.\text{/}.Math.K$

and p-type conductivity. The FOM value for the p-type TCO thin film in FIG. 1 was significantly higher than the FOM values of all other solution processed p-type TCO thin films previously reported and even higher than FOM values of most PVD and CVD prepared films. The thickness of the TCO thin film was 100 nm according to a cross-sectional SEM (FIG. 1(b) and FIGS. 4(a)) and 106 nm as measured by contact profilometry. The contact profilometry measurements performed on the film surface over 1 mm length with 1 m lateral resolution indicated that the standard deviation in the film height was 16 nm. Surface SEM images show that the film consisted of nano-porous network of 50-100 nm long nano-plates (FIG. 1(c), right) and the film was mostly smooth and homogenous with occasional micron-scale cracks (FIG. 1(c), left and FIG. 4(b)). These micron-scale cracks formed during calcination, mostly likely due to grain growth by coalescence of crystals. Assuming 100 nm thickness, the electrical conductivity of the TCO thin film could be calculated as =1/(R.sub.st)18 S/cm (resistivity, 57 mcm). This conductivity was more than 25 times lower compared to in-plane conductivities previously reported for single crystalline Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 (>500 S/cm). A plausible reason for the reduction in conductivity is the nanoporous and nanocrystalline microstructure of the film that reduces the effective cross-sectional area for electrical conduction and introduces contact resistance between the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 crystals. The micron scale cracks in the film could also reduce the specular optical transmission due to scattering of light, therefore, elimination of such defects should improve the optical transmission and FOM of the film. The nanoporous and nanocrystalline microstructure of the film were unlikely to cause significant optical scattering because the pore and crystal sizes were significantly shorter than the visible light wavelengths (FIG. 1(c)).

[0046] Decreasing the resin solute concentration to less than 3.5 M significantly increased sheet resistance and optical transmission of the calcined TCO thin films. In FIG. 2, sheet resistances, average specular optical transmissions in the visible range, and FOM values are plotted against calcination times for all Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 TCO thin films obtained from different solute concentrations (see FIG. 8(a) for optical transmission spectrum of the 15 minute calcined films). Sheet resistance values are reported with error bars (FIG. 2(a)), which correspond to the standard deviation from the 12 sheet resistance measurements performed on each film. Both optical transmission and sheet resistance significantly increased with decreasing solute concentration for the TCO thin films that were prepared from 2.5, 3.1, and 3.5 M solute concentration resins (FIG. 2(a)). This trend was most likely due to decreasing film thickness (t) since both optical transmission and sheet resistance increased with decreasing t as expressed by T=e.sup.t and R.sub.s=1/(t) respectively (assuming fixed and ). After 15 minutes calcination, the thicknesses of the TCO thin films that were prepared from 3.5, 3.1, and 2.5 M solute concentration resins were 10823, 859, and 495 nm, respectively, as measured by contact profilometry over a 1 mm length with 1 m lateral sampling. This decrease in the film thickness with decreasing solute concentration was reasonable as low solute concentration resins have visibly lower viscosity, resulting in thinner films after spin coating and calcination. Another reason for the increasing sheet resistance with decreasing solute concentration can also be associated with high porosity of the samples made with low solute concentration. Lower metal concentrations are expected to result in higher porosity as the water and organics are eliminated during baking (See FIG. 6 for surface SEM images of TCO films made from different solute concentration resins).

[0047] Decreasing the solute concentration from 3.5 to 3.1 M and from 3.1 to 2.5M caused up to a 9.5 and a 12.8 increase in the sheet resistance, respectively. The difference in sheet resistance between the 4.1 and 3.5 M samples was negligible (within the error limits) (FIG. 2(a)). This negligible change in the sheet resistance for these two concentrations (4.1 and 3.5 M) was likely due to the low quality of the 4.1 M films in terms of homogeneity and uniformity. The coefficients of variation in the 12 sheet resistance measurements performed on 15 minute calcined thin films are 0.06, 0.09, 0.07 and 0.21 in order of increasing solute concentration. This revealed that the 4.1 M sample was significantly more inhomogeneous compared to the others in terms of sheet resistance. The 4.1 M sample was also visibly inhomogeneous in terms of color and transparency, unlike the other films (See FIG. 5(b) for camera images of the 15 minute calcined films). SEM images indicate that the film prepared from 4.1 M solute concentration resin was non-uniform and not very well attached to the substrate.

[0048] For all solute concentrations except 3.5 M, the lowest sheet resistances were observed at 15 minutes calcination and the sheet resistance gradually increased as calcination time increased past 15 minutes. For the 3.5 M solute concentration the sheet resistance gradually reached the lowest value at 25 minutes calcination and increased again at 35 minutes calcination (FIG. 2(a)). The high sheet resistance at 5 minutes calcination of the thin films was likely due to incomplete crystallization of the metallic species into the highly conductive Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase. The increase in the sheet resistance as calcination times approached 35 minutes is likely due to coalescence of Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 crystals, which break the electrical connections between the particles. SEM images showed obvious coalescence of Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 crystals after 135 minutes of calcination in comparison with the TCO film calcined for 45 minutes, and a concomitant increase in sheet resistance by 2-3 orders of magnitude comparing the 45 and 135 minutes calcination time samples (FIG. 8). The film obtained from the 3.5 M solute concentration resin at 25 minutes calcination had the lowest sheet resistance among all of our TCO thin film samples (sheet resistance 5.7 k/sq, 57 mcm). This same film showed the best spatial homogeneity in terms of sheet resistance, with a coefficient of variance of 0.03 in the 12 sheet resistance measurements performed on different locations on the film.

[0049] Optical transmission, interestingly, did not vary greatly across calcination times (FIG. 2(b)). However, transmission markedly increased as precursor concentration decreased. The highest visible range optical transmission (67% in average) was measured for the film obtained from the 2.5 M solute concentration after 35 minutes calcination.

[0050] The optimum transparent conductive properties were obtained when the baked films were calcined for 15 minutes (2.5, 3.1, and 4.1 M concentration) or 25 minutes (3.5 M). FOM values calculated from the sheet resistances and optical transmissions (FIGS. 2(a) & 2(b)) were plotted in FIG. 2(c). The FOM increased as the calcination time was increased from 5 minutes to 15 minutes for the 2.5, 3.1, and 4.1 M samples, and decreased as the calcination time increased further. For the 3.5 M sample the FOM peaked at 25 minutes calcination. The FOM increased as the solute concentration increased at all calcination times for solute concentrations 2.5, 3.1, and 3.5 M, but the highest solute concentration (4.1 M) showed a decreased FOM below the 3.5 M sample's values. The FOM was highest for the film with lowest sheet resistance (3.5 M solute concentration and 25 minutes calcination) and lowest for the film with highest optical transmission (2.5 M solute concentration and 35 minutes calcination).

[0051] X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns obtained from the TCO thin films could be indexed by assuming Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 crystalline structure. FIG. 3(a) shows XRD patterns for four top-performing TCO thin films (solute resins concentrations: 2.5, 3.1, 3.5, and 4.1 M; calcined at 650 C. for 15 or 25 minutes) and another TCO thin film that is prepared from 4.9 M solute concentration resin and calcined at 650 C. for 25 minutes (FIG. 3(a)(i-v)). Notable is that the XRD spectrum of FIG. 3(a)(i-v) is the limited number of XRD peaks, generally less than 5 peaks or 4 peaks, and as low as 1 peak. For comparison, FIG. 3(a) also includes the XRD pattern of calcium cobalt oxide powder that are obtained by direct calcination of the 3.5 M solute concentration resin at 650 C. for 3 hours (FIG. 3(a)(vi)). The resin solute concentrations and calcination times are indicated next to the XRD patterns. In XRD measurements of the films the scattering vector (Q) is aligned perpendicular to the quartz substrate. The wide background peak from the quartz substrate is separately measured and subtracted from all of the TCO thin film XRD patterns. The XRD pattern for the powder obtained from the calcination of the 3.5 M solute concentration resin (FIG. 3(a)(vi)) matched with most of the reference peaks (FIG. 3(a) vertical bars at bottom) for the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase. The asterisk (*) marked peak of the powder matched the (111) peak of CaO phase (PDF #004-0777), which can form as an impurity due to excess Ca in the resin. The XRD pattern of the TCO films prepared from a 4.1 and 4.9 M solute concentration resin have (002), (004) and (201) peaks matched with the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 reference (FIG. 3(a)(iv-v)). The XRD patterns for the other TCO thin films in FIG. 3(a) clearly show two (00L) peaks from the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 reference (FIG. 3(a)(i-iii)). The absence of peaks other than the (00L) planes indicates texturing of the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 crystals, with alignment of the c-axis perpendicular to the substrate. Considering the number of peaks from different crystal planes, the XRD patterns from the 4.1 and 4.9 M samples are a transition between the randomly oriented crystals of the powder form and the c-axis oriented crystals of the top-performing TCO thin films. This is probably due to extreme non-uniformity and excessive peeling of the TCO films prepared from the more viscous 4.1 and 4.9 M solute concentration resins. The peak from the CaO phase did not appear in the TCO thin film XRD patterns probably due to diffusion of excess Ca in the resin to the glass substrate. Scherrer analysis of the (002) peak from the film with the highest FOM (3.5 M solute concentration and 25 minutes calcination, FIG. 3(a)(iii)) indicated that the average crystal size was 22 nm along the [00L] direction. The film obtained from the 2.5 M solute concentration resin at 15 minutes calcination only showed a weak (002) peak that matched with the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase (FIG. 3(a)(i)).

[0052] XPS was performed on the top-performing TCO thin film (3.5 M concentration, 25 minutes calcination) (FIG. 3(b)). XPS was measured at the film surface (FIG. 3(b), red curve) and after removing the upper 30 nm of surface by Ar-ion milling (FIG. 3(b), blue curve). The Co 2p, Ca 2p, O 1s and C 1s peaks are evaluated for elemental analysis. Elemental analysis from XPS shows that the film surface consisted of 7.3% Co, 12.4% Ca, 51.8% 0 and 28.5% C. The Ca:Co ratio on the film surface was 1.7 higher than the original Ca:Co ratio in the resin, indicating Ca migration to the film surface. High C and Ca content on the film surface was likely from calcium carbonate or bicarbonate phases forming on the film surface as a result of the reaction of Ca ions in the film with H.sub.2O and CO.sub.2 in air. After 30 nm of Ar-ion milling, XPS indicated atomic percentages of 25.6% Co, 18.4% Ca, 48.2% 0 and 7.8% C. This result implied that the Ca:Co ratio in the inner regions of the film was 0.72, which is very close to the Ca:Co ratio of the stoichiometric Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase. However, the film was O deficient compared to the Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 phase, likely due to preferential etch of the O atoms by Ar-ion milling. The XPS after Ar-ion milling also showed a weak Ar 2p peak due to minor Ar deposition on the film (FIG. 3(b)).

[0053] In conclusion, p-type transparent conducting thin films of Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 were obtained using a scalable and cost-effective manufacturing technique. The FOM value for the p-type Ca.sub.3Co.sub.4O.sub.9 films can be as high as 151 M.sup.1, exceeding the FOM values reported for other solution processed p-type TCO thin films, as well as those prepared by PVD and CVD. The lowest sheet resistance and highest visible range optical transmission for the TCO films were 5.7 k/sq and 67.1%, respectively. Near infrared region optical transmission is as high as 85% for a most conductive TCO thin film. The embodied cost-effective, sol-gel based technique is compatible with most of the metallic species and it can be readily applied to other metal oxide thin film structures.

[0054] All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties to the same extent as if each reference was individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.

[0055] The use of the terms a and an and the and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms comprising, having, including, and containing are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning including, but not limited to,) unless otherwise noted. The term connected is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening.

[0056] The recitation of ranges of values herein (i.e., which are intended to have a relative uncertainty of 10% unless clearly otherwise indicated) are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it was individually recited herein.

[0057] All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., such as) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not impose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed.

[0058] No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

[0059] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. There is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.