Doctor blade including combination carbon/glass yarns

Abstract

A fiber reinforced composite material containing a polymeric resin matrix reinforced by fabrics consisting of co-mingled glass/carbon yarns for a doctor blade.

Claims

1. A doctor blade for use in a papermaking machine, comprising a fiber reinforced composite material containing a polymeric resin matrix reinforced by fabrics comprising combination glass/carbon yarns, wherein a combination glass/carbon yarn comprises combination glass/carbon fibers comprising a combination of carbon material and glass material, wherein the combination glass/carbon yarn does not include high performance thermoplastic fibers.

2. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein the percentage of carbon fibers to total fibers is about 5-95%.

3. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein the percentage of glass fibers to total fibers is about 5-95%.

4. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 3 wherein the fibers are oriented in both the machine and cross machine directions.

5. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 3, wherein the fibers are oriented substantially in the machine direction.

6. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 3 wherein the total thickness of the blade is about 0.015 inches to about 0.250 inches.

7. The doctor blade of claim 6 wherein the total thickness of the blade is about 0.040 inches to about 0.110 inches.

8. The doctor blade of claim 7 wherein the total thickness of the blade is about 0.050 inches to about 0.080 inches.

9. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 3, wherein the blade comprises one or more fabric reinforcement layers that are comprised of glass and carbon commingled fibers.

10. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein the percentage of carbon fibers is about 40% and the percentage of glass fibers is about 60%.

11. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein the polymeric resin material is an epoxy or thermoplastic.

12. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: high performance thermoplastic material.

13. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 12, wherein the high performance thermoplastic material comprise fibers selected from the group of: commingled glass fibers and high performance thermoplastic fibers; commingled carbon fibers and high performance thermoplastic fibers; and commingled carbon fibers, glass fibers, and high performance thermoplastic fibers.

14. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 12, comprising: a high performance thermoplastic selected from polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphthalamide (PPA).

15. A doctor blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the blade further comprises: nanoparticles in the polymeric resin matrix.

16. The doctor blade of claim 15 wherein said nanoparticles are selected from the group consisting of powders, grains, fibers and platelets.

17. The doctor blade of claim 16 wherein said nanoparticles are metallic and selected from the group consisting of metal oxides, carbides or nitrides, metallic complexes, ionic structures and covalent bonds.

18. The doctor blade of claim 16 wherein said nanoparticles are non-metallic and/or covalent and selected from the group consisting of clay particles, silicates, ceramic materials, glass particles, carbon black, fumed silica, calcium carbonate, carbon nanotubes and nanospheres of ceramic powders.

19. The doctor blade of claim 15 wherein said nanoparticles are metallic and selected from the group consisting of metal oxides, carbides or nitrides, metallic complexes, ionic structures and covalent bonds.

20. The doctor blade of claim 15 wherein said nanoparticles are non-metallic and/or covalent and selected from the group consisting of clay particles, silicates, ceramic materials, glass particles, carbon black, fumed silica, calcium carbonate, carbon nanotubes and nanospheres of ceramic powders.

21. The doctor blade of claim 15 wherein said nanoparticles comprise between about 0.5 to 75% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix.

22. The doctor blade of claim 21 wherein said nanoparticles comprise between about 1 to 20% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix.

23. The doctor blade of claim 22 wherein said nanoparticles comprise between about 10 to 15% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix.

24. The doctor blade of claim 21 wherein said nanoparticles comprise about 3% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix, and wherein the nanoparticles consist essentially of carbon nanotubes.

25. The doctor blade of claim 21, wherein said nanoparticles comprise between about 20% to about 40% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix, and wherein the nanoparticles consist essentially of silica nanoparticles.

26. The doctor blade of claim 25 wherein said nanoparticles comprise between about 30% to about 40% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix.

27. The doctor blade of claim 15, wherein the blade comprises a plurality of said fabrics impregnated with said polymeric resin matrix.

28. The doctor blade of claim 15, wherein the blade comprises a plurality of said fabrics with film layers interposed therebetween, at least one of said fabric and film layers being impregnated with said polymeric resin matrix.

29. The doctor blade of claim 1, wherein the combination glass/carbon fibers comprise commingled glass fibers and carbon fibers.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a partial cross sectional view, with dimensions exaggerated for purposes of illustration, of a blade construction in accordance with an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(2) It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions of the present invention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevant for a clear understanding of the present invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, many other elements which are conventional in this art. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other elements are desirable for implementing the present invention. However, because such elements are well known in the art, and because they do not facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, a discussion of such elements is not provided herein.

(3) The present invention will now be described in detail on the basis of exemplary embodiments.

(4) Methods for forming a commingled yarn for a doctor blade include separating a plurality of fibers of differing composition into individual filament components within a chamber. As described above the differing composition of the fibers include carbon and glass. The individual filament components are then intermixed by introducing hot air into the chamber. As a result of introducing hot air currents, the individual filament components get intimately mixed together. The mixed filament components are then brought together as a single fiber. The glass filaments, therefore, become randomly distributed in the commingled carbon-glass yarn. Systems and methods for forming multi-component and commingled yarns are known in the art and for the sake of brevity are not described herein. These commingled fibers can then be woven or stitched into potentially any type of reinforcement fabric, e.g. plain weave, twill, multiaxial, etc.

(5) The yarns thus formed can be used to produce doctor blades with carbon and glass synergistically combined together in the same yarns and reinforcement fabrics.

(6) With reference initially to FIG. 1, a doctor blade constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown at 10 comprises a composite of multiple layers 12 of resin-impregnated fabrics (commonly referred to as pre-pregs). The pre-pregs may comprise woven or non-woven commingled fibers can then be woven or stitched into potentially any type of reinforcement fabric, e.g. plain weave, twill, multiaxial, etc as described herein. In one example, a 400 gsm plain weave fabric with commingled yarns consisting of 40% carbon and 60% glass was produced. A five (5) layer laminate of this fabric with commingled yarns was made.

(7) The layers 12 are impregnated with a resin. A representative resin dispersion is a bisphenol A type epoxy resin, but can include other conventional resins as known in the art. The resin interfaces at 16 serve to adhere the layers 12 together during lamination under conditions of elevated temperature and pressure in accordance with well known practices.

(8) Other manufacturing methods for the planar element 10 known to those skilled in the art include pultrusion, resin injection, and reactive resin injection molding.

(9) In an embodiment, disclosed is a doctor blade comprising commingled glass/carbon yarns. In another embodiment, the doctor blade comprises commingled glass/carbon, and high performance thermoplastic yarns. Embodiments include commingled glass/carbon/high performance thermoplastic yarns in any combination. For example, the doctor blade can further comprise commingled glass/high performance thermoplastic and carbon/high performance thermoplastic yarns. The high performance thermoplastics can include thermoplastics selected from PPS, PEEK, PEI, PPA, and other high performance thermoplastics known in the art. Advantages of the high performance thermoplastic material includes eliminating the need for solvent based resins, potentially making the yarns and the doctor blades made therefrom recyclable, and improving the chemical resistance of the doctor blades. Adding high performance thermoplastic components as part of the commingled yarn thus may reduce the need for solvent based resins, makes the blades recyclable, and improves the solvent and chemical resistance as compared to conventional doctor blade resins such as epoxy and phenolic.

(10) As described above, conventional doctor blades have distinctive layers of different fabric reinforcements, such as carbon and glass. Carbon and glass have very different coefficients of thermal expansion:
Carbon=9.110.sup.7 K.sup.1
Glass=+510.sup.6 K.sup.1.

(11) So when resins are cured in conventional known doctor blade manufacturing processes, the distinctive glass layers expand whilst the carbon layers contract. The reverse occurs when the material cools: the glass layers contract whilst the carbon layers expand. The contrary expansions and contractions during curing and cooling stress the resin at a molecular level, which leads to weak inter-layer bonding.

(12) In an embodiment, disclosed a doctor blade for use in a papermaking machine, comprising a fiber reinforced composite material containing a polymeric resin matrix reinforced by fabrics consisting of commingled glass/carbon yarns. The polymeric resin material can be an epoxy or a thermoplastic. In an embodiment, the percentage of carbon fibers to total fibers is about 5-95%.

(13) In an embodiment, the percentage of glass fibers to total fibers is about 5-95%. In one embodiment, the fiber reinforced composite includes a percentage of carbon fibers of about 40% and the percentage of glass fibers of about 60%. The doctor blade can comprise a total thickness between about 0.3 mm and about 5.0 mm (0.01 inches to about 0.25).

(14) In an embodiment, the total thickness of the doctor blade is about 0.015 (inches) to about 0.250, for example about 0.040 to about 0.110 or between about 0.050 and about 0.080. The doctor blade can comprise two or more layers of the blade are comprised of glass and carbon commingled fibers. The remaining layers may comprise standard woven, unidirectional, or chopped mat fibers containing the glass, carbon, or another reinforcing fiber material or in some cases, no fiber at all, being a pure resin layer. In one embodiment, the fibers are oriented in both the machine and cross machine directions. In another embodiment, the fibers can be oriented substantially in the machine direction.

(15) In an embodiment, the fiber reinforced composite further comprises high performance thermoplastic (HPT) yarns. The doctor blade can further comprise commingled yarns selected from the group of: commingled glass and HPT, commingled carbon and HPT, and commingled glass, carbon and HPT. Exemplary HPT includes conventionally known HPT including HPT selected from polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphthalamide (PPA).

(16) An exemplary advantage of the commingled fabrics described herein includes, inter alia, that layers of the doctor blade expand and contract to substantially the same extent at substantially the same time, which this eliminates the stress and weakness in the chemical bonds between the layers and leads to better inter-layer bonds and hence a better higher performance doctor blade.

(17) Another exemplary advantage includes the fact that using layers of a commingled fabric produces a more homogeneous blade that leads to more consistent and more steady state performance. Conventional doctor blades wear quickly through layers of glass, then slowly through layers of carbon, quickly again through glass, slowly again through carbon, and quickly through glass yet again. In a doctor blade produced in accord with embodiments of commingled fiber reinforcement fabric as disclosed herein, the wear remains consistent throughout the construction since the blade is more homogeneous and gives steady state performance throughout its life. Therefore, the commingled fabric as described herein produces a blade with consistent performance throughout the lifetime of the blade.

(18) In an embodiment, commingled fabrics can be held together or laminated with resins containing carbon nanotubes and/or nanoparticles for use in doctor blades and planar elements. Doctor blades and incorporation of nanoparticles into resins for use in planar elements such as doctor blades are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/148,624 entitled PLANAR ELEMENTS FOR USE IN PAPERMAKING MACHINES, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein. The nanoparticles can be selected from powders, grains, fibers and platelets. For instance, metallic nanoparticles can selected from the group consisting of metal oxides, carbides or nitrides, metallic complexes, ionic structures and covalent bonds. Non-metallic and/or covalent particles usable in doctor blades include clay particles, silicates, ceramic materials, glass particles, carbon black, fumed silica, calcium carbonate, carbon nanotubes and nanospheres of ceramic powders.

(19) In one embodiment a doctor blade can comprise resins including nanoparticles comprising between about 0.5 to 75% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix, for example between about 5 to 20% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix or nanoparticles between about 10 to 15% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix. In an embodiment, the nanoparticles can comprise about 3% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix, wherein the nanoparticles comprise or consist essentially of carbon nanotubes.

(20) In another embodiment the doctor blade can comprise resins including nanoparticles comprising between about 20% to about 40% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix, and wherein the nanoparticles comprise or consist essentially of silica nanoparticles. For example, the silica nanoparticles can be between about 30% to about 40% by weight of said polymeric resin matrix.

(21) The doctor blade can comprise a composite of multiple fabric substrates impregnated with the polymeric resin matrix including nanoparticles. For example, fabric substrates can include film layers interposed therebetween, at least one of said fabric substrates and film layers being impregnated with the polymeric resin matrix including nanoparticles.

(22) For example, referring the FIG. 1, the layers 12 can be impregnated with a resin containing a dispersion of nanoparticles, such as for example, carbon nanotubes and or silica nanoparticles. A representative resin dispersion is a bisphenol A type epoxy resin, with carbon nanotube nanoparticles added to and uniformly dispersed therein in an amount of 3% by weight of the resin matrix. The resin interfaces at 16 serve to adhere the layers 12 together during lamination under conditions of elevated temperature and pressure in accordance with well known practices.

Example

(23) In one example, a 400 gsm plain weave fabric with commingled yarns consisting of 40% carbon and 60% glass was produced. A five (5) layer laminate of this fabric with commingled yarns was made. The laminate thus produced was exceptionally stiff and strong. The laminate was also very flat and straight and accordingly had no distortion. The laminate was not prone to delamination as the layers could not be peeled apart by a peel test, whereby a layer of the laminate is attached to a spring balanced scale and is pulled to cause the layer to peel, with the pull required to peel the layer being recorded.

(24) A 1.8 mm commingled blade comprising the commingled yarns consisting of 40% carbon and 60% glass was tested on an in-house wear tester against two different types of conventional glass-carbon doctor blades (Carbovic and Carbotek 4) of the same thickness and carbon content. The test was conducted by running the test blades against a chilled cast iron roll running at a speed of 1570 m/minute (50 Hz) for 24 hours at a loading of 1.2 Bar.

(25) The commingled blade showed less weight loss (0.58%) and improved resistance to wear as compared to conventional blade 1 (type 1) (0.82%) and conventional blade 2 (type 2) (1.41%).

(26) Additionally the commingled blade showed lower initial frictional drag (15.7 Amps were required to maintain the roll speed of 1570 m/min)), compared to conventional blade type (1) (18.0 Amps were required to maintain the roll speed of 1570 m/min), and conventional blade type (2) (20.5 Amps were required to maintain the roll speed of 1570 m/min). Accordingly, this resulted in a lower energy demand on the roll in order to maintain the same roll speed.

(27) The commingled blade also displayed improved steady state performance over the conventional blades, averaging 14.90 Amps after 10 minutes of testing and requiring only 13.9 Amps after 24 hour to maintain the set roll speed, compared to conventional blade type (1) (15.05 Amps average after 10 mins. and requiring 14.0 Amps after 24 hours) and conventional blade type (2) (17.62 Amps average after 10 mins. and requiring 14.2 Amps after 24 hours).

(28) The commingled blade also showed improved performance on a peel test. With the comingled blade the surface layer could not be lifted, as compared to conventional blade type (1) where the surface layer was peeled at 7.3 lbs and conventional blade type (2) where the surface layer was lifted at 8 lbs, all on a 3 wide sample.