BIFIDOBACTERIUM LACTIS STRAIN FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING COLITIS AND USE THEREOF
20230069454 · 2023-03-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61P1/04
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Y02A50/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C12R2001/01
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
The present disclosure provides a Bifidobacterium lactis (B. lactis) strain XLTG11 and a use thereof. The strain belongs to Bifidobacterium lactis. The B. lactis strain XLTG11 was deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) on Oct. 25, 2019, with a taxonomic name of Bifidobacterium lactis XLTG11 and an accession number of CGMCC No. 18738. The B. lactis strain XLTG11 provided by the present disclosure can regulate an inflammatory cytokine, improve an intestinal barrier function, and modulate an intestinal flora by inhibiting the activation of a TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby alleviating dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. In addition, the B. lactis strain XLTG11 has an immune-enhancing effect on a cyclophosphamide (CTX)-induced mouse immunosuppression model.
Claims
1. A Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11, having an accession number of CGMCC No. 18738.
2. A use of the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1 in a preparation of a product for preventing and/or treating colitis.
3. The use according to claim 2, wherein the colitis is ulcerative colitis.
4. A use of the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1 in a preparation of a product for modulating an intestinal flora.
5. A use of the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1 in a preparation of a product for regulating an inflammatory cytokine by inhibiting an activation of a TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.
6. A use of the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1 in a preparation of a product for enhancing an immune function.
7. The use according to claim 2, wherein the product is a drug.
8. A drug for preventing and/or treating colitis or enhancing an immunomodulatory function, wherein the drug comprises the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1.
9. The drug according to claim 8, wherein the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 is comprised at a dosage of 1 × 10.sup.6 cfu to 1 × 10.sup.9 cfu.
10. A microbial agent comprising the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 according to claim 1, wherein the microbial agent is prepared by the following steps: anaerobically cultivating the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 for 18 h at 37° C. in a modified MRS medium supplemented with 0.05 % cysteine hydrochloride, passaging and cultivating, collecting cells of the Bifidobacterium lactis strain XLTG11 through a centrifugation, washing the cells 3 times with sterile phosphate buffered saline, and resuspending the cells in phosphate buffered saline at concentrations of 1 × 10.sup.7 CFU/mL and 1 × 10.sup.8 CFU/mL.
11. The use according to claim 3, wherein the product is a drug.
12. The use according to claim 4, wherein the product is a drug.
13. The use according to claim 5, wherein the product is a drug.
14. The use according to claim 6, wherein the product is a drug.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
Example 1 Screening and Identification of B. Lactis Strain
[0030] A strain was isolated from intestinal tracts of healthy children and identified by 16s rRNA full-length sequencing and mass spectrometry (MS). The strain belongs to Bifidobacterium lactis, and the strain was deposited in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) on Oct. 25, 2019, with a taxonomic name of Bifidobacterium lactis XLTG11 and an accession number of CGMCC No. 18738; and the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) is located at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1, West Beichen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
[0031] The B. lactis strain XLTG11 has the following biological characteristics: Gram-positive, anaerobic, non-motile, non-spore-forming, and smooth and gibbous colonies with intact edges, and white creamy appearance.
[0032] The tolerance of the B. lactis strain XLTG11 to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids was tested. After the B. lactis strain XLTG11 was digested in an artificial gastric fluid with pH 2.5 for 3 h, a survival rate of the B. lactis strain was 75.01%, and after the B. lactis strain XLTG11 was further digested in an artificial digestive fluid with pH 8.0 for 11 h, a survival rate of the B. lactis strain was as high as 89.75%, indicating that the B. lactis strain has high tolerance to a gastrointestinal digestive fluid, and can enter a human intestinal tract in a living state to exert a health effect.
Example 2 Preparation of a Bacterial Suspension
[0033] The strain was anaerobically cultivated for 18 h at 37° C. in a modified MRS medium with 0.05% cysteine hydrochloride (China Qingdao Hope Biological Co., Ltd., HB0384-5), and passaged twice before the experiment. Cells of the B. lactis strain XLTG11 were collected through centrifugation at 6,000 × g and 4° C. for 10 min, washed three times with sterile PBS, and resuspended in PBS at concentrations of 1 × 10.sup.7 CFU/mL and 1 × 10.sup.8 CFU/mL.
Example 3 Influence of B. Lactis Strain XLTG11 on the Symptoms of DSS-Induced Colitis
[0034] 8-week-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) C57BL/6 male mice were purchased from the Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. Before the experiment, all animals were raised for one week at a temperature of 23 ± 2° C. and a humidity of 50% ± 10% with a 12 h light-dark cycle for acclimatisation. The mice were randomly divided into four groups: normal control group (NC), model control group (MC), low-dose B. lactis strain XLTG11 group (BL), and high-dose B. lactis strain XLTG11 group (BH). During the experiment, the BL and BH groups were orally administered with low-dose B. lactis strain XLTG11 (1 × 10.sup.7 CFU/d) and high-dose B. lactis strain XLTG11 (1 × 10.sup.8 CFU/d) once a day, respectively. The NC and MC groups were each injected with 200 .Math.L of PBS once a day at the same raising frequency. From day 15 to day 21, all mice except mice in the NC group drank 2.5% DSS-containing drinking water to induce colitis. During DSS treatment, a body weight was measured for all mice every day, and a DAI score was recorded based on the body weight loss, stool consistency, and total blood volume. After the experiment was completed, the mice were fasted for 12 h and then anesthetized and sacrificed. Blood was collected from eyeballs of all mice and centrifuged at 4° C. and 3,500 rpm for 15 min to obtain serum, and the serum was stored at -80° C. A colon content was collected under sterile conditions and then stored at -80° C. for intestinal flora analysis. A colon was collected and the colon length was measured, and the colon was rinsed with normal saline (NS). The excised colon tissue was immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for histopathological analysis, and the remaining tissue was stored at -80° C. for qRT-PCR. A spleen was collected and weighed, and a spleen index was calculated as follows: organ weight (g)/body weight (g) × 100.
[0035] Measured body weights during DSS induction were shown in
Example 4 Influence of B. Lactis Strain XLTG11 on the Histopathological Analysis of Colon Tissues
[0036] A distal colon was fixed with 4% PFA for 48 h, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned to obtain 5 .Math.m sections. The sections were dewaxed with xylene, then stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE), and observed (a histological score was calculated by a method with reference to Tan, Y. et. al., The American journal of the medical sciences 2018, 355, 377-386; and Zhao, H.W. et. al., World journal of gastroenterology 2017, 23, 999-1009).
[0037] Histological changes of colons of mice in each treatment group were shown in
Example 5 Influence of B. Lactis Strain XLTG11 on the Inflammatory Cytokines, the mRNA Expression of Claudin-1, Occludin, and Zo-1, and the Tlr4/Myd88/Nf-Κb Signaling Pathway
[0038] Colon tissues of mice in different treatment groups were each weighed, ground with a prepared reagent as a homogenization medium in a weight-to-volume ratio of 1:19, and tested for MPO. According to instructions, an ELISA kit (Quanzhou Kenuodi Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Quanzhou, China) was used to detect the levels of interleukins IL-1β, IL-10, and IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor TNF-α in serum.
[0039] The levels of inflammatory cytokines in serum of mice in each treatment group were shown in
[0040] The mRNA expression levels of colonic TJPs (claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1) were shown in
[0041] In order to investigate whether the TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB signaling pathway plays an important role in an anti-inflammatory mechanism of B. lactis strain XLTG11, the mRNA expression levels of related genes were determined. The results were shown in
Example 6 Influence of B. Lactis Strain XLTG11 on the Structure and Composition of an Intestinal Flora
[0042] Relative mRNA levels of TJP genes (claudin-1, occlusion, and ZO-1) and TLR4 signaling pathway-associated genes (TLR4, MYD88, and NF-κB) were detected through qRT-PCR, with a GAPDH gene as an internal reference gene. Colonic total RNA was extracted with RNAiso Plus (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) and quantified with a 2000C ultra-micro ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), and the extracted RNA was subjected to reverse transcription with reference to a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit RNA kit (Roche, Germany, 04897030001). qRT-PCR was conducted according to the instructions on the Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Foster City, CA, USA), the on-line detection was conducted with reference to the instructions of a kit Stormstar SybrGreen qPCR Master Mix (DBI Bioscience, Germany, DBI-2143), and data were analyzed by the 2-ΔΔCt method.
[0043] The flora DNA was extracted from colons of mice in each group (n = 3) with a kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). PCR amplification was conducted on V3 and V4 regions of bacterial 16S rDNA with primers 338F and 806R: (5'-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3') (forward primer) and (5'-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3') (reverse primer). The resulting PCR products were purified with an AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing was conducted on the IlluminaMiseq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The raw data were merged with Flash (version 1.2.11) software and filtered by QIIME (V1.9.1) to collect high-quality labels. Valid labels were clustered by UCLUST (version 1.2.22) with a similarity ≥ 97% OTU [25]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were analyzed by PyNAST software (version 1.2) based on the Greengenes database and the taxonomic information was annotated at the phylum and genus levels.
[0044] All data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software and expressed as mean ± SD. A statistical difference was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and then the Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) was conducted. A relationship between a dominant intestinal flora and UC-associated symptoms was evaluated by a Spearman correlation coefficient, and P < 0.05 indicated that there was a statistically-significant difference.
[0045] In this study, the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rDNA gene were sequenced, and the intestinal floras in colonic contents of different groups were analyzed. As shown in
[0046] As shown in
[0047] In order to determine a role of an intestinal flora in reducing inflammatory biomarkers, correlations of the UC-associated symptoms and related gene expression with a dominant intestinal flora were analyzed at a genus level in this study. As shown in
Example 7 Establishment of an Immunosuppression Model
[0048] SPF BALB/c male mice that each were 6 to 8 weeks old and weighed 18 g to 22 g were provided by Liaoning Changsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., with animal license No.: SCXK (Liao) 2020-0001. The BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 7 groups, with 8 mice in each group. Mice in the blank group and model group were each orally gavaged with 0.4 mL of NS, mice in the positive control group were each orally gavaged with levamisole hydrochloride (LEV) (10 mg.Math.kg.sup.-1), and mice in the B. lactis strain XLTG11 dose groups were orally gavaged with 0.4 mL of B. lactis strain XLTG11 suspensions at doses of 1 × 10.sup.9 cfu, 1 × 10.sup.8 cfu, 1 × 10.sup.7 cfu, and 1 × 10.sup.6 cfu per mouse, respectively. The mice were orally gavaged continuously for 28 d, during which the mice could eat and drink freely. On day 23 and day 24 after the oral gavage, mice in the model group, positive control group, and B. lactis strain XLTG11 dose groups were intraperitoneally injected with CTX (40 mg.Math.kg.sup.-1), and mice in the blank group were intraperitoneally injected with an equal volume of NS.
Example 8 Determination of an Immune Organ Index
[0049] On day 28 after the oral gavage, mice in each group were weighed and then sacrificed by cervical dislocation, the thymus and spleen were collected and weighed, and the thymus and spleen indexes were calculated. Thymus or spleen index = thymus or spleen mass (mg)/mouse body mass (g).
[0050] The effects of different B. lactis strain XLTG11 doses on the thymus and spleen indexes of CTX mice were shown in Table 1 and
TABLE-US-00001 Effect of different B. lactis strain XLTG11 doses on thymus and spleen indexes of CTX mice ( x ± S, n = 8) Groups Thymus index Spleen index Control 2.11±0.36 3.12±0.94 Model 0.99±0.20*** 2.40±0.54* Positive control 1.42±0.44.sup.# 2.97±0.49 XLTG11 (1×10.sup.6 cfu) 1.36±0.31.sup.# 2.69±0.42 XLTG11 (1×10.sup.7 cfu) 1.42±0.41.sup.# 2.71±0.50 XLTG11 (1×10.sup.7 cfu) 1.55±0.44.sup.## 2.73±0.62 XLTG11 (1×10.sup.9 cfu) 1.83±0.32.sup.### 2.89±0.42 Note: *P < 0.05, and ***P < 0.001 versus Control group; and .sup.#P < 0.05, .sup.##P < 0.01, and .sup.###P < 0.001 versus Model group.
Example 9 Determination of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity (DTH)
[0051] On day 23 after the oral gavage, mice in each group were intraperitoneally injected with 0.2 mL of 2% (v/v) sheep red blood cells (SRBCs). On day 27 after the oral gavage, a thickness of a left hind toe was measured with a vernier caliper, each mouse was subcutaneously injected with 20 .Math.L of 20% (V/V) SRBC at a measurement site, and 24 h later, a thickness of the left hind toe was measured once again. Multiple measurements were conducted at the same site, and an average was taken. A reaction degree of DTH was expressed by a difference in toe thickness before and after the injection. The influence of different B. lactis strain XLTG11 doses on the toe thickness of CTX mice was shown in Table 2. Compared with the blank group, a toe thickness of mice in the model group was significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and a toe thickness of mice in the B. lactis strain XLTG11 dose (1 × 10.sup.9 cfu) group was significantly increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the model group, a toe thickness of mice in the positive control group was increased significantly (P < 0.01), and a toe thickness of mice in each B. lactis strain XLTG11 dose group was increased (P < 0.05).
TABLE-US-00002 Effect of different B. lactis strain XLTG11 doses on the toe thickness of CTX mice ( x ± S, n = 8) Groups Toe thickness difference (cm) Control 0.050±0.004 Model 0.034±0.008* Positive control 0.054±0.011.sup.## XLTG11 (1×10.sup.6 cfu) 0.047±0.012.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.7 cfu) 0.051±0.005.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.8 cfu) 0.053±0.009.sup.## XLTG11 (1×10.sup.9 cfu) 0.066±0.024*.sup.### Note: *P < 0.05 versus Control group; and .sup.#P < 0.05, .sup.##P < 0.01, .sup.###P < 0.001 versus Model group.
Example 10 Pathological Changes of Small Intestinal Mucosal Tissue
[0052] The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, a small intestinal mucosal tissue was collected from mice in each group, fixed with 4% PFA, dehydrated, embedded, and sectioned to prepare paraffin sections, and the conventional HE staining was conducted. A pathological change of a small intestinal mucosal tissue was observed under an optical microscope.
[0053] The HE staining results of mice in each group were shown in
Example 11 Determination of a Villus Height of a Small Intestinal Mucosa
[0054] The small intestinal mucosal tissue section of Example 10 was taken, a target area of the small intestinal tissue was selected and imaged at a magnification of 100 ×, the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 analysis software was used to determine heights of 5 intact intestinal villi (villus height) in each section with mm as a standard unit, and then an average was taken.
[0055] The villus height measurement results of small intestinal mucosas of mice in each group were shown in
Example 12 Determination of the Number of Small Intestinal Goblet Cells
[0056] Sections were prepared by the same process as in Example 11. A section was stained with periodic acid Schiff (PAS), and the morphology and distribution of small intestinal intraepithelial goblet cells (goblet cell number) were observed under an optical microscope. A target area of the small intestinal tissue was selected and imaged at a magnification of 100 ×, the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 analysis software was used to determine the number of goblet cells on 5 intestinal villi in each section and a corresponding epithelial length with mm as a standard unit, and the number of goblet cells per unit length was calculated as follows: number of goblet cells/length.
[0057] The goblet cell number results of mice in each group were shown in Table 3 and
TABLE-US-00003 Small intestinal goblet cell number (x ± S, n = 8) Groups Goblet cell number Control 23.90±5.01 Model 17.06±3.49* Positive control 25.22±5.93.sup.## XLTG11 (1×10.sup.6 cfu) 19.50±6.77 XLTG11 (1×10.sup.7 cfu) 22.79±3.53.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.8 cfu) 23.96±5.68.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.9 cfu) 25.80±7.90.sup.## Note: *P < 0.05 versus Control group; and .sup.#P < 0.05, and .sup.##P < 0.01 versus Model group.
Example 13 Determination of a Cytokine Level in Serum
[0058] 30 min after the last oral gavage to mice in each group, eyeballs were removed, the whole blood was collected and centrifuged at 3000 r.Math.min.sup.-1 for 10 min, and the resulting serum was collected, dispensed, and frozen in a -80° C. refrigerator for test. Serum IgA, IgG, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels were determined with an ELISA kit, and specific operation steps were conducted according to the instructions.
[0059] The test results of cytokines in serum of mice in each group were shown in Table 4 and
TABLE-US-00004 Serum IgA, IgG, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels of mice in each group ('x ± S, n = 8) Groups IgA(ng.Math.mL.sup.-1) IgG(ng.Math.mL.sup.-1) IL-2(ng.Math.L.sup.-1) IL-6(pg.Math.mL.sup.-1) IFN-γ(ng.Math.L.sup.-1) TNF-α(ng.Math.L.sup.-1) Control 57.87±3.64 462.19±21.64 700.68±123.49 82.29±7.06 472.73±51.55 467.16±30.28 Model 48.38±3.65** 378.10±92.63** 533.40±65.94** 56.50±13.29*** 403.99±64.51* 412.70±57.50* Positive control 55.95±3.66.sup.## 467.59±54.35.sup.## 666.32±134.02.sup.# 77.12±7.49.sup.## 466.78±62.60.sup.# 496.86±49.31.sup.## XLTG11 (1×10.sup.6cfu) 54.11±3.19.sup.# 405.24±35.33 646.22±142.10.sup.# 61.59±8.77 399.58±51.32 463.58±38.69.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.7cfu) 54.75±3.30.sup.# 432.87±32.42.sup.# 663.80±103.17.sup.# 67.96±5.73 433.15±53.26 465.62±41.08.sup.# XLTG11 (1×10.sup.8cfu) 56.95±8.72.sup.## 440.56±47.27.sup.# 673.12±80.22.sup.# 68.73±4.61.sup.# 460.97±33.15.sup.# 468.12±78.39.sup.# XLTG11 (1x10.sup.9cfu) 58.07±6.85.sup.### 512.72±21.05.sup.### 725.08±63.62.sup.## 69.36±9.44.sup.# 476.94±47.67.sup.## 472.56±33.93.sup.# Note: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 versus Control group; .sup.#P<0.05, .sup.##P<0.01, .sup.###P<0.001 versus Model group