WHEEL SUSPENSION FOR A VEHICLE AXLE
20170015264 ยท 2017-01-19
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60G2200/156
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60G7/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60R21/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B62D21/15
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A wheel suspension for a vehicle axle includes a wheel carrier carrying a wheel which is displaceable rearward in a longitudinal direction of the vehicle in case of a frontal collision; a steering link, articulately connecting the wheel carrier to a vehicle superstructure, the steering link including at least two control arms articulately connected to the wheel carrier via respective support sites on the wheel carrier and to the vehicle superstructure via respective support sites on the vehicle superstructure; and an actuating element coupled with a first one of the two control arms and impinging the first control arm with a torsional force in response to a collision force resulting from the rearward displacement of the wheel caused by the frontal collision so as to cause detachment of the first control arm from the support site on the superstructure and/or on the wheel carrier.
Claims
1. A wheel suspension for a vehicle axle, in particular a front axle of a two-track vehicle, comprising: a wheel carrier carrying a wheel which is displaceable rearward in a longitudinal direction of the vehicle in case of a frontal collision; a steering link, articulately connecting the wheel carrier to a vehicle superstructure, said steering link comprising at least two control arms articulately connected to the wheel carrier via respective support sites on the wheel carrier and to the vehicle superstructure via respective support sites on the vehicle superstructure; and an actuating element coupled with a first one of the two control arms and impinging the first control arm with a torsional force in response to a collision force resulting from the rearward displacement of the wheel caused by the frontal collision, said torsional force causing detachment of the first control arm from the support site on the superstructure and/or on the wheel carrier thereby enabling the wheel carrier together with the second control arm to pivot about the support site of the second control arm on the superstructure in a further course of the collision.
2. The wheel suspension of claim 1, wherein the frontal collision has a low lateral overlap.
3. The wheel carrier of claim 1, wherein a rearward displacement of the wheel carrier resulting from the frontal collision causes a pivot movement of the first control.
4. The wheel carrier of claim 1, further comprising a counter contour provided on the superstructure, wherein the actuating element is connected to the first control arm for force transmission, and/or in response to the collision contacts the counter contour while building up a torsional force.
5. The wheel carrier of claim 4, wherein the contact between the actuating element and the counter contour caused by the collision counteracts the pivot movement of the first control arm.
6. The wheel suspension of claim 4, wherein during normal driving operation the actuating element is spaced apart from the counter contour by a clearance.
7. The wheel suspension of the claim 4, wherein the actuating element is connected to the first control am at a connection site on the first control arm, which is spaced apart from a force axis of the control arm by a lever arm length, said force axis extending as a straight line through the support sites of the first control arm on the superstructure and the wheel carrier.
8. The wheel carrier of claim 1, wherein the actuating element is constructed as a strut having a movement stop, said strut being articulately connected to the first control arm at a connection point on the first control arm for force transmission, and being supported for displacement in longitudinal direction of the strut in a guide provided on the superstructure for, wherein in response to the collision the movement stop of the strut comes into contact with a counter contour provided on the superstructure thereby resulting in the torsional force, wherein during normal operation the movement stop is not in contact with the counter contour on the superstructure.
9. The wheel suspension of claim 8, wherein the strut is arranged on a crash-averted side of the first control arm and in response to the collision is impinged with a compression force resulting in the torsional force.
10. The wheel suspension of claim 8 wherein the strut is arranged on a crash facing side of the first control arm and that the strut in the case of collision is impinged with a tensile force resulting in the torsional force.
11. The wheel suspension of claim 1, wherein the first control arm and the second control arm are arranged in a lower plane of the steering link, and wherein the first control arm is configured as a two-point transverse control arm and/or the second control arm is configured as a longitudinal control arm.
12. The wheel suspension of claim 11, wherein the longitudinal control arm is located in longitudinal direction of the vehicle in front of the two-point control arm, wherein the two-point control arm extends close to a center of the wheel and approximately points toward the center of the wheel, and wherein the strut is connected to the two-point control arm.
13. The wheel suspension of claim 1, wherein the first control arm is one of two an upper transverse control arms of the steering link.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0018] Other features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent upon reading the following description of currently preferred exemplified embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0023] Throughout all the Figures, same or corresponding elements may generally be indicated by same reference numerals. These depicted embodiments are to be understood as illustrative of the invention and not as limiting in any way. It should also be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that the embodiments are sometimes illustrated by graphic symbols, phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.
[0024]
[0025] As shown in
[0026] According to
[0027] As further shown in
[0028] The strut connection point 25 can for example be configured as a force transmitting metal ball joint. In addition the connection point 25 is spaced apart with a lever arm length l (
[0029] According to
[0030] As further shown in
[0031] During normal driving operation the pressure strut 27 is switched functionless. This means that according to
[0032] The compression strut 27 is only activated in the event of a collision, as explained below by way of
[0033] The support sites 13, 15 of the two-point transverse control arm 9 on the superstructure thus are impinged with a torsion, which occurs in the case of a crash but not during normal operation. Because the support sites 13, 15 are not configured to withstand such a torsion stress, a small force is already sufficient to destroy the support sites 13, 15 of the two-point transverse control arm 9.
[0034]
[0035] In
[0036] What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims and includes equivalents of the elements recited therein: