3-dimensional atomic structure model with magnetically attached sub-atomic particle models
20230069280 · 2023-03-02
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The invention comprises an atomic structure kit for enabling students to understand how atoms are made of smaller sub-atomic particles, the architecture of these particles in relation to each other, and the forces acting upon the sub-atomic particles that hold an atom together. The kit comprises a central body representing an atomic nucleus attached to a shaft about which concentric circular or elliptical rings are rotatably attached. A plurality of bodies representing protons and neutrons is magnetically attachable to the atomic nucleus, and a plurality of bodies representing electrons is magnetically attachable to the rotatable rings. The properties and geometry of the magnetic materials mimic the strong localised force relationships between sub-atomic particles, specifically the electron-electron, proton-proton repulsion, the electron-nucleus attraction and the very strong attraction between the nucleons that bind the nucleus.
Claims
1. A 3-dimensional model for representing the structure of an atom, the model comprising: a shaft or filament; a central magnetic body connected to the shaft or filament; a plurality of bodies magnetically attachable to the central magnetic body to represent an atomic nucleus, each body representing a proton and/or a neutron; a plurality of concentric rings centres of which substantially coincide with the location of the central magnetic body, the rings connected to the shaft or filament such that the rings can substantially freely rotate around an axis of the shaft or filament; and a plurality of bodies representing electrons magnetically attachable to the rings.
2. A kit for a 3-dimensional model for representing the structure of an atom, the kit comprising: a shaft or filament; a body comprising a central magnetic body connected to the shaft or filament; and a plurality of concentric rings centres of which substantially coincide with the location of the central magnetic body, the rings connected to the shaft or filament such that the rings can substantially freely rotate around an axis of the shaft or filament; a plurality of bodies magnetically attachable to the central magnetic body to represent an atomic nucleus, each spherical body representing a proton and/or a neutron; a plurality of bodies representing electrons magnetically attachable to the rings.
3. The model of claim 1, wherein the shaft or filament is a shaft.
4. The model claim 3, wherein the central body is substantially centrally attached to the shaft.
5. The model of claim 1, wherein the shaft or filament is a filament.
6. The model of claim 5, wherein the central body is attached at or towards an end of the filament.
7. The model of claim 1, wherein each spherical body attachable to the central body represents a proton or a neutron.
8. The model of claim 1, wherein the bodies representing electrons make polar repulsions against each other.
9. The model of claim 1, wherein the bodies representing protons make polar repulsions against each other.
10. The model of claim 1, wherein the bodies representing protons make polar attractions to the bodies representing electrons.
11. The model of claim 1, wherein the bodies representing protons make polar attractions to the central body.
12. The model of claim 1, wherein the respective bodies representing the protons, the neutrons, and the electrons are spheroid bodies.
13. The model of claim 3, wherein movable mounting of the shaft allows for rotation of the rings about two perpendicular axes.
14. The model of claim 13, wherein the shaft is movably mounted to a circular rail at mounting positions at or towards first and second ends of the shaft.
15. The model of claim 14, wherein the substantially circular rail is in a horizontal plane.
16. The model of claim 14, wherein the substantially circular rail is in a vertical plane.
17. The model of claim 1, when used for teaching atomic structure.
18. A method of assembling a model for representing the structure of an atom, including steps of: a) connecting a central magnetic body to a shaft or filament; b) connecting a plurality of concentric rings with the shaft or filament such that centres of the rings substantially coincide with the location of the central body, and the rings can substantially freely rotate around an axis of the shaft or filament; c) magnetically attaching a plurality of bodies to the central body, each of the plurality of bodies representing a proton and/or a neutron; and d) magnetically attaching a plurality of bodies representing electrons to the rings.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0035] Definition of Terms: The term “magnetic material” refers to a substance that is attracted to a magnet, or responds to an external magnetic field. A magnetic material is not itself necessarily a permanent magnet. Such materials include but are not limited to iron, nickel, cobalt, niobium and a few rare earth materials and their alloys.
[0036] The term “magnet” is a magnetic substance that has been magnetized to becomes a source of a permanent magnetic field. These include the above substance that have undergone a magnetizing process that aligns their magnetic domains. A magnet will attract another magnet according to the polarity rules: unlike poles attract; like poles repel. They will also attract a magnetic material such as iron by magnetic induction. They will also align to an external magnetic field if free to do so.
[0037] The term “localized magnet” refers to a magnet in which the North pole and South poles are positioned to produce a magnetic field whose field lines radiate in or out from the magnet at significant angles. For example, a horseshoe-shaped, or rod-shaped magnet, or a ball magnet will produce field lines that emanate away from the north pole in a radial fashion, and into the south pole in a radial fashion. The concentration of field lines, that is, the strength of the magnetic fields, are concentrated at the poles. The poles are regions that have stronger magnetic field strengths than at other points. Magnetic force interactions with magnetic materials will be stronger in the regions where the field lines are concentrated.
[0038] The term “dispersed magnet” refers to a magnet in which the magnetic field lines are uniform. For example, a magnetic film with poles on either side will produce magnetic field lines that emanate as parallel lines away from the north side, and as parallel lines into the south side. The magnetic lines do not congregate to concentrate regions of high magnetic field strength across the surface of the film. That is, one point on the surface of the film has the same magnetic strength as another.
[0039] Provided according to an aspect of the invention is an atomic structure model. Typically, the atomic structure model comprises a plurality of circular orbital rings comprising a magnetic material such as iron or steel, supported by a rigid shaft to which the rings are coupled, so that the rings can rotate freely about the shaft. Typically, the plurality of orbital rings surround a platform or similar containing a magnet-embedded localized nucleus. Exemplary embodiments of the nucleus arrangement are shown in
[0040] Electron models with embedded localized magnets (see, for example,
[0041] In some embodiments of the atomic structure model the magnetic material and magnets are reversed e.g. the orbital rings comprising the magnet with the electron models comprising of the magnetic material; and/or the nuclear models comprising the magnetic material and the nucleon models comprising of the magnets.
[0042] The localized magnets embedded into the electron models are arranged so that the same pole protrudes from the model, whereas the opposite pole is embedded so that the magnetic field strength is masked. This allows a net repulsive force to be exerted between any two electron models.
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053] Certain advantages of at least typical embodiments of the atomic structure model according to the invention will now be described.
[0054] The present atomic structure model addresses shape problems: The current 3-D invention (along with certain existing 3-D mobile type models) has a compelling advantage over 2-D flat models, whether or not the latter employ either flat dispersed magnet films attached to a flat surface like a whiteboard, or non-magnetic spherical shapes to represent subatomic particles. Any 2-D representation of an atoms is problematic. 3-dimensionality is also important because students find it difficult to reconcile this ‘skeletal’ model of an atom comprised only of its internal sub-atomic particles being visible, with the 3-dimensional models of atoms in which only the ‘surface’ of the atom is visible, as in a solid ball. Normally the student learning progression moves from a ‘solid’ to the ‘skeletal’ model of an atom. Because this progression is a key step, it is useful to make these two versions as similar as possible. In other words, to shift from a 3-D solid ball model to a 2-D sub-atomic model is changing too many variables in a single shift; not withstanding that the 2-D model is also conceptually inaccurate. It is pedagogically preferable for students to compare a 3-D solid ball version with a 3-D sub-atomic skeletal version, so that the only difference is in the visibility of the atom's internal structure. If the dimensionality of the model also changes (from 3-D back to 2D), this adds an unnecessary confusion to the students' understanding. The use of localized magnets, as described herein with reference to
[0055] The present atomic structure model addresses force-directionality problems: The force directionality problem with the 2-D flat magnet film type model has been discussed above, in which the flat dispersed magnets whose surfaces attach with uniform force as they are shifted sideways across the white board surface, display no preferential force of attachment to the nucleus region in the case of the nucleons, or to the orbital rings in the case of the electron models. Existing 3-D mobile type models also suffer directionality problems, as the sub-atomic particle models need to be shifted into place, and attached to a sticky substance, then by an external pressing force applied by the user. In other words, there is no inherent force directionality at all without guidance from the user. Indeed, the 3-D mobile type model implies not internal atomic forces-at-a-distance at all. Real atomic nuclei employ a highly localized strong nuclear force to bind the nucleons together, or a nucleon to the existing nucleus, in which the nuclear attractive force is highly directed between two points—the nucleon and the nucleus. A similar force directionality to real atoms is achieved with the present invention because a localized magnet, in which a magnetic material in the geometry of a point, or confined sphere, is attracted to another point, the nucleus-magnet. The present invention also addresses the directionality problem for the electron models, as the localized electron model is specifically attracted to, and attaches to, the magnetic orbital rings. It also addresses the 3-D mobile model type problem, as the magnetic attractions spontaneously attract, and cause attachment, of the sub-atomic particles to their sites on the model without requirement of an external force, except for the original positioning. The lack of effort in binding nucleons to the nucleus more accurately reflects how nuclei actually form in real atoms. In the case of the electrons, orienting the same magnetic pole of the embedded magnet in identical fashion for all electron models will create a net repulsive force between them. For example, if the North pole protrudes to the outside of the embedding material out of which the electron model is composed, while the South pole is embedded and its magnetic field strength is masked at this pole, then the North pole will dominate in any electron-electron interaction, creating a repelling effect. This mimics the repulsive force of interaction between electron-electron pairs as all electrons carry a negative charge. The point-to-point directionality of this force will also be preserved.
[0056] How the present atomic structure model addresses force-distance issues: In the case of the 2-D type model, the force required to pull apart the flat fridge magnet surface from the white board surface is not very sensitive to the separation distance of the surfaces, as a result of the uniform magnetic field patterns associated with flat dispersed magnetic films, and because the magnets are attached to a flat 2-D surface e.g. a whiteboard. However, the nucleon models in the present atomic structure model are attached specifically to, and directed towards, the nuclear region by a localized magnet, in a similar way that the nucleons are contained within the nucleus by a localized strong nuclear force. Force-wise, pulling a nucleon model away from the nucleus model is similar to pulling a nucleon away from the nuclear region, if localized magnets are used. The initial effort is relatively high, but once the nucleon is free from the nucleus, only minimal force is required to fully detach it. This means that the magnetic force of attraction between a localized magnet (especially a strong one like a rare earth magnet) within the nucleus model and a magnetic particle/nucleon is highly sensitive to separation distance. When the particles are close, the magnetic force is very strong because the magnetic field strength is high close to the magnet, but as they are pulled apart, this force diminishes in strength exponentially as the magnetic field strength fades away. This is a better analogue to both electric and nuclear forces of attraction within atoms. Electric forces vary inversely with the square of the distance of separation of the electric charges, showing that the force is disproportionately sensitive to separation distance. In the case of the strong nuclear force, this relationship to separation distance is even more sensitive. Existing 3-D mobile type models have an even more serious flaw in their representation of the force-distance relationships because they rely upon the user to physically guide and press the sub-atomic particle models onto the corresponding sites. Because the binding process is accomplished through the effort of the user, the model suggests that there [[is]] are no internal attractive forces of attraction within atoms at all. The is superior in showing that the attractive force gets much stronger as the sub-atomic particles get closer to their target sites, and that the binding processes within atoms are spontaneous and effortless. Nucleons do not need to be ‘squeezed’ and stuck together by an external agent, and no analogue for such an agent exists within real atoms. All that is required is that the nucleons be proximate, and the natural attractive nuclear force will take over to bind them together. A similar situation exists with electrons that spontaneously and effortlessly attach to atoms through the electric attractive force between oppositely charged particles. No external agent is required. Rather than requiring energy, binding an electron to form an atom instead releases energy, that is, it is an exothermic process, not an effortful endothermic process.
[0057] Other benefits of the present atomic structure model: A further advantage of the present model using localized magnetic forces is that the attachments do not require fine motor skills that younger students often do not possess. Attaching is also instantaneous and more fun so are pedagogically more engaging. Because the user kinesthetically ‘feels’ the attractive forces during attachment and detachment (and repulsions with electron-electron interactions), along with their sensitivity to distance of separation and directionality, learning outcomes are more meaningful. For example, the spontaneous exothermic nature of attaching a nucleon to the nucleus is more understandable if the student can physically feel the models attaching effortlessly. Conversely, the effortful endothermic nature of detaching a nucleon is more understandable if the student needs to physically overcome the magnetic attractions to separate the particles in a hands-on way. The force directionality and distance sensitivity are likewise understood kinesthetically with the localized magnetic forces involved. Kinesthetic learning is acknowledged to be one of the three key modalities of learning: the other two being the visual and auditory modes.
[0058] A key to components in the figures is provided as follows. Note that the numbers used in a figure apply to all subsequent figures, unless otherwise indicated.
[0059]
[0070]
[0075]
[0077]
[0079]
[0082]
[0086]
[0089]
[0091]
[0092]
[0093]
[0094]
[0097]
[0101] In this specification, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” are not to be read as singular indefinite articles or as otherwise excluding more than one or more than a single subject to which the indefinite article refers. For example, “a” shaft includes one shaft, one or more shafts, and a plurality of shafts.
[0102] In this specification, the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes”, “including”, and similar terms, are intended to denote the inclusion of a stated integer or integers, but not necessarily the exclusion of another integer or other integers, depending on context. That is, a product, composition, or method, etc., that comprises or includes stated integer(s) need not have those integer(s) solely, and may well have at least some other integers not stated, depending on context.
[0103] In this specification, terms such as “above” and “below”; “front” and “back”; “top” and “bottom”; “left” and “right”; “horizontal” and “vertical”, and the like, may be used for descriptive purposes. However, it will be understood that embodiments can potentially be arranged in various orientations, and that such relative terms are not limiting and may be interchangeable in appropriate circumstances.
[0104] In this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “connection”, “connected”, “connecting”, and the like, are not to be read as limited to direct connections and may also include indirect connections. For example, unless the context requires otherwise, a stated first component “connected” to a stated second component may be connected via, through, or by, one or more unstated components.