Cranberry plant named ‘WI02-A4G-X1’

Abstract

A new and distinct cranberry variety ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ is described. The variety is distinguished by having very early flowering and fruit color development, strong flower bud set and rebud set, and consistently high fruit yield.

Claims

1. A new and distinct variety of cranberry plant named ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ herein described and illustrated.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) This new cranberry plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures.

(2) FIG. 1—Shows the full pedigree of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’. Female parents are provided in the upper boxes of each cross. ‘McFarlin’ (not patented) and ‘Early Black’ are wild selections from Massachusetts; ‘Potter’ (not patented) and ‘Searles’ are wild selections from Wisconsin. ‘BL8’ is an open-pollinated seedling selection of ‘Ben Lear’ (selected in Portage County, Wis.). ‘HyRed’ is a cultivar developed by the University of Wisconsin cranberry breeding program. ‘Bergman’ is a cultivar developed by the USDA breeding program carried out in the 1930's. The cross of ‘HyRed’ x ‘Bergman’ to combine early and intense fruit color from two unrelated lines (‘Ben Lear’ and ‘Early Black’) was conceived and carried out in Madison, Wis. and first field planted in 1997. The selection of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ for scale-up was made in 2002.

(3) FIG. 2—Shows a molecular comparison of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ to its parents, ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’. Of the twelve markers developed by the Zalapa lab for cranberry cultivar identification based on microsatellites, nine markers clearly differentiate ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ from its parents, either because the loci were homozygous while the parents were heterozygous (yellow boxes) or because there is an allele present that could only come from one parent. The distribution of inherited alleles in ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ is shown to be unique and clearly demonstrates that it is a hybrid of ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’.

(4) FIG. 3—Shows a comparison of bloom timing between ‘WI02-A4G-X1’, ‘HyRed’ and ‘Stevens’ at Site 1 (Wood County, Wis.) on Jun. 9, 2015. ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ was the most advanced, with many open flowers; while ‘HyRed’ had few open flowers, but had many well developed unopened flowers. ‘Stevens’ was far behind with few flowers visible on this date. While the difference is variable depending on site, season and age of bed, the bloom order is always ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ before ‘HyRed’ before ‘Stevens’ and most other cultivars.

(5) FIG. 4—Shows early fruit color of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’, ‘HyRed’ and ‘Stevens’ by site and color class. 150 berries from three random sub-samples taken in late August of 2014 for each site (Site 1 is in Wood County, Wis., Site 2 is in Juneau County, Wis.) and cultivar were rated into five color classes based on the percent of pink or red surface coverage on each berry. ‘Stevens’ fruit were mostly lacking any color and were still green. ‘HyRed’ had a somewhat even distribution across color classes. ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ yielded fruit mostly in the highest color class, demonstrating a very early fruit color development.

(6) FIG. 5—Shows early fruit color coverage of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’. Three random half-square foot samples were taken from adjacent beds of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’, ‘HyRed’ and ‘Stevens’ from a site in Wood County, Wis., in late August of 2014. The color differences between the three cultivars is clear, with ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ having the most uniform and darker red coloration.

(7) FIG. 6—Shows early fruit color as demonstrated by average percent of acceptable berries (75% or more pink or red surface coverage), by cultivar and site (Site 1 is in Wood County, Wis., Site 2 is in Juneau County, Wis.). Three random samples per cultivar and site were taken in late August of 2014 and 50-berry random subsamples rated. ‘Stevens’ yielded no acceptable berries at either site, as expected for such an early harvest date. ‘HyRed’ was better at about 30% acceptable berries, while ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ was best with over twice as many acceptable fruit as ‘HyRed’.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

(8) The distinctive characteristics of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ are described in detail below.

Molecular Analysis of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ and its Parents

(9) The molecular analysis of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ and its parents was carried out using methods known in the art (Fajardo et al., Plant Mol Biol Rep 31:264-271, 2013; Zhu et al., Theor Appl Genet 124:87-96, 2012), and the results are presented in Table 1 and FIG. 2. The results show that nine out of twelve SSR microsatellite markers were able to differentiate ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ from one or both parents and that the pattern of alleles is consistent with a hybrid between ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’. The distribution of inherited alleles in ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ clearly demonstrates that it is a hybrid of ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’. The unique allelic composition of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ can be used to differentiate it from all other cranberry cultivars tested (Fajardo et al., Plant Mol Biol Rep 31:264-271, 2013). Multiple samples taken from across the various planted beds of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ yielded uniformly identical results.

(10) Table 1 below shows the results of microsatellite (SSR) analysis of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ and its parents ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’. Each locus yields two alleles of the same (homozygous) or different (heterozygous) size as indicated by the values present (which indicate the number of base pairs). Nine out of the twelve SSR markers previously found to be most useful in DNA fingerprinting cranberry cultivars were found to differentiate ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ from either or (in most cases) both parents. There are no alleles present in ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ that are not present in the parents and the distribution of alleles is consistent with a hybrid between ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’.

(11) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Microsatellite (SSR) analysis of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ and its parents ‘HyRed’ and ‘Bergman’. SSR ‘WI02- locus ‘HyRed’ A4G-XI’ ‘Bergman’ Notes ct04084 151/155 151/155 151/155 No difference present ct25796 195/243 195/243 195/243 No difference present ct26877 246/265 265/268 259/268 ‘WIO2-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents ct28527 216/216 216/232 216/232 ‘WIO2-A4G-X1’ differs from ‘HyRed’ ct31701 268/305 268/268 257/268 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents ct38401 185/185 185/185 185/187 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from ‘Bergman’ ct39030 202/204 196/204 196/196 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents ct40600 182/182 182/182 182/182 No difference present ct51985 174/182 174/178 171/178 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents ct52682 271/279 271/279 269/279 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from ‘Bergman’ ct554441 171/175 175/181 173/181 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents ct78806 223/225 225/227 227/227 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ differs from both parents

Earlier Bloom Timing of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’

(12) ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ blooms earlier than other cultivars at all sites in all years. The differential in the timing of full bloom depends on a number of factors, including bed age, horticultural management, location, and season. Site 1 in Wood County, Wis., has the oldest planting in a dedicated bed with adjacent beds of ‘HyRed’, ‘Ben Lear’ and ‘Stevens’. On Jun. 12, 2012, ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ was fully out of bloom with abundant fruit set, while ‘Stevens’ was in full bloom with no fruit set yet. On Jun. 9, 2015, the same beds showed less extreme differences (FIG. 3), but the relative bloom order was as follows: ‘WI02-A4G-X1’.fwdarw.‘HyRed’.fwdarw.‘Ben Lear’.fwdarw.‘Stevens’ and most other cultivars. Although there may be overlap, the difference between cultivars for peak bloom has always been the same, with a differential of four to seven days between each the cultivars listed above.

Early Fruit Color Development of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’

(13) The early color development of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ was compared to its grandparent, the late maturing cultivar ‘Stevens’, and to its parent, the early cultivar ‘HyRed’. In late August of 2014 (far earlier than normal harvest timing), three random half-square foot samples (all berries harvested) were taken from adjacent beds (Site 1, Wood County, Wis.) or near adjacent beds (Site 2, Juneau County, Wis.). Total anthocyanins (Tacy), which provides an average color and does not distinguish between individual green or red berries, was not used for early color differentiation. Instead, from each sample, a random sub-sample of 50 berries was taken and each berry classified based on the percent pink or red coverage over the surface area. The ratings were: 0-5% pink or red, 5-25% pink or red, 25-50% pink or red, 50-75% pink or red, or 75-100% pink or red.

(14) The distribution of berries from all of the three samples by site, cultivar, and rating class are shown in FIGS. 4-6. There was little difference between sites. ‘Stevens’ had mostly poorly colored berries as expected, ‘HyRed’ had a somewhat even distribution, and ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ had a mostly high number of berries with early color coverage.

(15) Using OCEAN SPRAY® criteria for “acceptable” color coverage for fresh berries (75% pink or red coverage), the differences between the three cultivars are quite clear (FIG. 6.) there was no significant differences between sites, but there were clear difference between cultivars (the means between cultivars were all significantly different by pairwise t-tests at a probability of 0.01 or greater).

Yield of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’

(16) Optimization of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ for yield has not been fully examined and optimal management will significantly differ from other cultivars due to its earlier flowering and fruit maturation. However, the yield results obtained to date are very favorable (Table 2) and ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ is expected to outperform many other cultivars once optimized, due its very high rebud (flower bud set on fruiting stems) and flower bud set in general. A key element in this optimization is the development of a very high upright (fruiting stem) density, as this is a major component of yield, particularly if a very high percentage of uprights set flower buds as expected for ‘WI02-A4G-X1’. It is difficult to compare beds of different age and many beds of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ were mowed for propagation with no yield data available. Typically a bed is fully established by five years after planting. The yield on 3-year-old ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ plants was as good or better than that of other varieties of the same age and will improve as the beds mature, as evidenced by the older planting at Site 1.

(17) Table 2 below shows the results of comparative yield testing of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’, ‘HyRed’, and ‘Stevens’. Site 1 is in Wood County, Wis.; Site 2 is in Juneau County, Wis.; Site 3 is in Eau Claire County, Wis. Site 3 did not have plantings of ‘Stevens’ or ‘HyRed’. Morphological description of cranberry cultivar ‘WI02-A4G-X1’. Growth habit.—‘WI02-A4G-X1’ produces fruit on upright stems, with vegetative expansion occurring by stolons. Runner length.—Stolon length is quite variable in cranberry due to fertilization and management differences at each farm and/or each individual bed. While stolon length is not typically used to distinguish cranberry cultivars, it should be noted that there was no observable difference between ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ and its parents. Uprights.—Cranberry is not grown commercially as discrete plants, and thus evaluation of individual uprights per plant was not performed. Leaves.—All cranberry leaves are petiolate. Measurement of individual leaves was not performed. Flowers.—All cranberries produce flowers in the lower axils of new upright growth from pre-formed initials in flower buds. V. macrocarpon does not produce clusters, unlike some other Vaccinium species (notably V. corybosum, the commercial highbush blueberry). The flower number can vary greatly between flowering upright stems, both within a bed and between beds (due to age and management), and thus was not measured. Fragrance in cranberry is minimal. Flower buds.—Flower bud shape does not vary between cranberry cultivars, although the flower bud size can vary. Flower petals.—Cranberry in commercial production or even in the wild (with sufficient nutrient availability) does not vary much in flower size or other traits. Thus, these were not measured. Sepals.—Not measured. Bloom time.—Bloom time varies greatly with weather, season, and location, and occurs over several weeks. Fruit.—Fruit shape data can be useful in generally distinguishing cultivars, although these are highly variable within a planting bed, between beds, and based on location, age, and management method, among other factors. Most other fruit characteristics are not useful in distinguishing cultivars and thus were not measured. The fruit of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ can be harvested for fresh consumption or processed into juice, sauce, jams, and dried cranberries. Fruit brix and titratable acidity.—These characteristics vary very little between varieties compared to variation between growing regions, harvest date, season and location, and as such have little value in distinguishing cultivars. As such, these were not measured. Harvest season.—Harvest date is determined by growing region and also between individual growers and varies accordingly. The earlier fruit color of ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ allows harvest as early as the first week of September, one or more weeks earlier than most other cultivars. Pollinator.—All cranberry plants are usually pollinated by imported honey bees and wild or cultivated bumble bees. Disease and pest resistance/susceptibility.—These were not determined.

(18) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative yield of W102-A4G-X1’, HyRed’, and ‘Stevens’ in 2015. Avg. Yield Site Cultivar Acres (B/a) notes 1 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ 0.5 523.9 established bed 1 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ 6.2 261.3 3-year-old bed 1 ‘Stevens’ 72.5 165 established beds 1 ‘HyRed’ 19.4 291 established beds 2 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ 3 344 estimate, unestablished 2 ‘Stevens’ 16 419 established beds 2 ‘HyRed’ 6 481 established beds 3 ‘WI02-A4G-X1’ 7.4 321 3-year-old beds