Adaptive electronically steerable array (AESA) system for interceptor RF target engagement and communications
09541364 ยท 2017-01-10
Assignee
Inventors
- Andrew B. Facciano (Tucson, AZ, US)
- Rodney H. Krebs (Oro Valley, AZ, US)
- Michael S. Bielas (Tucson, AZ, US)
- Cody D. Tretschok (Tucson, AZ, US)
- Michael S. Spangler (Vail, AZ, US)
- Benjamin Mitchell (Oro Valley, AZ, US)
Cpc classification
F41G7/2286
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41G7/2253
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F42B15/01
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H01Q3/24
ELECTRICITY
H01Q1/42
ELECTRICITY
F42B30/006
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H01Q1/28
ELECTRICITY
F41G7/2293
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41G7/008
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F42B30/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H01Q1/28
ELECTRICITY
F42B15/01
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41G7/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41G7/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H01Q1/42
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
An adaptive electronically steerable array (AESA) system comprises a plurality of arrays, each comprising a plurality of radiating elements, each array configured for placement on a forward-facing surface of a different one of a plurality of aerodynamic control surfaces on an interceptor. A plurality of radio frequency (RF) transmissive radome elements, each having an aerodynamic shape complementary to the aerodynamic control surface, are placed over one of the arrays. Control circuitry configures the arrays, independently or in concert, for RF target engagement and communication. Additional arrays may be positioned on side or aft-facing surfaces of the aerodynamic control surfaces for RF communication. The AESA system may be paired with an IR system for dual-mode operation.
Claims
1. An interceptor, comprising: an airframe having a longitudinal axis; a plurality of dorsal fins positioned about a circumference of the airframe and running parallel to the longitudinal axis, each said dorsal fin having a forward-facing surface that is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis; an adaptive electronically steerable array (AESA) system comprising a plurality of AESA arrays, each AESA array placed on the forward-facing surface of a different one of said dorsal fins, each said AESA array comprising a plurality of radiating elements configured to emit radio frequency (RF) energy substantially perpendicular to the forward-facing surface and substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis; a plurality of RF transmissive radome elements, each radome element placed on the forward-facing surface of a different one of said plurality of dorsal fins over the respective one of said AESA arrays, each said radome element having an aerodynamic shape complementary to a cross-section of said dorsal fin; and control circuitry to configure the plurality of AESA arrays for RF target engagement.
2. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein said dorsal fins have side-facing surfaces, further comprising: an additional plurality of AESA arrays, each one of said additional plurality of AESA arrays comprising a plurality of radiating elements placed on the side-facing surface of a different one of said plurality of dorsal fins, wherein said control circuitry configures the additional plurality of AESA arrays for RF communication.
3. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein said dorsal fins have aft-facing surfaces that are substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, further comprising: an additional plurality of AESA arrays, each one of said additional plurality of AESA arrays comprising a plurality of radiating elements placed on the aft-facing surface of a different one of said plurality of dorsal fins, wherein said control circuitry configures the additional plurality of AESA arrays for RF communication.
4. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays with independent beam patterns.
5. The interceptor of claim 4, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays to scan the independent beam patterns over different regions of a field-of-regard (FOR) to search for and acquire a target.
6. The interceptor of claim 5, wherein once the target is acquired, the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays to produce a combined beam pattern to track the target, said combined beam pattern having a greater sensitivity than any one of said individual beam patterns.
7. The interceptor of claim 6, wherein the interceptor comprises a boresight strap down infrared (IR) seeker having a FOR less than the FOR of the independent beam patterns, wherein at terminal, said control circuitry activates the boresight strap down IR seeker to engage the target.
8. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays to produce a combined beam pattern.
9. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays for RF target engagement and RF communications with a communication station.
10. The interceptor of claim 9, wherein the control circuitry configures at least one said AESA array for RF target engagement and a different at least one said AESA array for RF communications with the communication station for simultaneous RF target engagement and RF communications.
11. The interceptor of claim 9, wherein the control circuitry configures at least one said AESA array for RF target engagement and a different at least one said AESA array for RF communications with the communication station for serial RF target engagement and RF communications.
12. The interceptor of claim 10, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays for multi-band operations.
13. The interceptor of claim 1, wherein the interceptor further comprises a forward looking non-gimbaled IR seeker mounted on the front of the airframe and an axis-symmetric IR transmissive dome mounted over the forward looking non-gimbaled IR seeker, wherein no AESA array is mounted inside the IR transmissive dome.
14. The missile interceptor of claim 1, wherein each said dorsal fin has a triangular cross-section that defines a triangularly shaped forward-facing surface on which the AESA arrays are placed, each said AESA array comprising a triangular arrangement of said plurality of radiating elements, wherein said radome element has a solid triangular shape.
15. An interceptor comprising: an airframe having a longitudinal axis; a plurality of aerodynamic control surfaces positioned about the airframe, each control surface having a forward-facing surface that is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, an adaptive electronically steerable array (AESA) system a plurality of AESA arrays, each AESA array placed on the forward-facing surface of a different one of said plurality of aerodynamic control surfaces, each said AESA array comprising a plurality of radiating elements configured to emit radio frequency (RF) energy substantially perpendicular to the forward-facing surface and substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis; a plurality of RF transmissive radome elements, each radome element placed on the forward-facing surface of a different one of said plurality of aerodynamic control surfaces over the respective one of said AESA arrays, each said radome element having an aerodynamic shape complementary to said aerodynamic control surface; and control circuitry to configure the plurality of AESA arrays for RF target engagement.
16. The interceptor of claim 15, wherein the control circuitry configures the plurality of AESA arrays both independently and in concert for RF target engagement and configures the plurality of AESA arrays for both RF target engagement and RF communications.
17. The interceptor of claim 15, wherein the interceptor comprises a forward looking non-gimbaled IR seeker mounted on the front of the airframe and an axis-symmetric IR transmissive dome mounted over the IR seeker, wherein no AESA array is mounted inside the IR transmissive dome.
18. A method of radio frequency (RF) target engagement comprising: positioning adaptive electronically steerable array (AESA) arrays on the forward-facing surfaces of a plurality of dorsal fins positioned about and running parallel to a longitudinal axis of an interceptor, each AESA array comprising a plurality of radiating elements configured to emit RF energy substantially perpendicular to the forward-facing surface and substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis that together define an AESA system; placing a plurality of RF transmissive radome elements over different ones of said AESA arrays on the forward-facing surfaces, each said radome element having an aerodynamic shape complementary to a cross-section of the dorsal fin; and configuring the arrays for RF target engagement.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the AESA arrays are configured both independently and in concert for RF target engagement.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the AESA arrays are configured for both RF target engagement and RF communications.
21. The method of claim 18, further comprising mounting a forward looking non-gimbaled IR seeker on the front of the airframe and mounting an axis-symmetric IR transmissive dome over the IR seeker without mounting an AESA array inside the IR transmissive dome.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(8) The present invention describes an AESA system for RF target engagement and communications for interceptor. The AESA system comprises multiple arrays that are deployed on aerodynamic control surfaces of the interceptor. The arrays may be controlled independently or in concert for RF target engagement or communications. The AESA system may be paired with an IR system for dual-mode operation. Removal of the AESA system from the interceptor radome increases the design options for implementation of the IR system. For example, the dual-mode system may be able to eliminate the mechanical gimbal for the IR seeker and use an axisymmetric dome without sacrificing performance.
(9) The interceptor may be any airborne vehicle that includes aerodynamic control surfaces. These surfaces may provide lift or maneuverability, may be fixed or moveable. For example, the interceptor may be a self-propelled missile, a gun-launched projectile, a unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a manned aircraft or a planetary lander (provided the destination planet has an atmosphere). Without loss of generality, the AESA system will be shown in described in the context of a missile interceptor having four fixed dorsal fins positioned every 90 degrees about the circumference of the interceptor. The dorsal fins are modified to incorporate the AESA arrays and radome elements.
(10) Referring now to
(11) AESA system 12 comprises a plurality of arrays 30, each comprising a plurality of radiating elements 32. Each array 30 is placed on a different one of the forward-facing surfaces 26 of the fins 24. As shown, each array 30 is connected to a power source such as the interceptor's power bus or a battery to power the radiating elements. A plurality of RF transmissive radome elements 36 are placed over respective arrays 30. The radome elements 36 are formed of a material such as ceramic or organic composite materials that is transmissive in the RF band and physically durable. Each radome element has an aerodynamic shape complementary to said aerodynamic control surface (fin) to maintain the aerodynamic properties of the control surface (fin). The exact shape of the radome element will depend on the cross-section of the fin. In some cases, the array of radiating elements may be larger than the exposed forward-facing surface 26, in which case, the size and shape of the radome element may be modified.
(12) In this embodiment dorsal fin 24 has a triangular cross-section that defines a triangularly shaped forward-facing surface 26 on which an AESA array 30 is placed. AESA array 30 comprises a triangular arrangement of radiating elements 32 coupled to a power source. Radome element 36 has a solid triangular shape that is complementary to the triangular cross-section of fin 24.
(13) Control circuitry 38 is connected to configure the arrays 30 for RF target engagement. The control circuitry may be integrated with other control circuitry on the interceptor that performs other tasks such as general avionics or guidance.
(14) In different embodiments, the control circuitry 38 may configure the arrays 30 to operate independently. For example, the arrays may scan their individual beam patterns to search for and acquire a target. Or different arrays may be used for RF target engagement and RF communication, either simultaneously or serially. The control circuitry may configure the arrays to operate in concert to form a single combined beam pattern with enhanced sensitivity. This may, for example, be used for target tracking or for communications. The control circuitry may configure the arrays for multi-band operation. This may be done, for example, by configuring each radiating element in an array to operate as a single aperture in a first frequency band and by configuring a subset of the radiating elements in an array to operate as a single aperture in a second frequency band. Multi-band operation may be used for either target tracking or communication.
(15) In this embodiment of interceptor 10, the AESA system 12 is paired with IR system 14 for dual-mode operation. In general, IR system 14 can be any system that can be located in the payload 20 behind forward looking IR dome 22, which is formed of materials that are transmissive in the IR band. The IR system may be fixed or gimbaled, and may be forward or side looking. However, because the AESA system is not co-located with the IR system in the IR dome, there is considerably more flexibility to design the IR system and the IR dome. For example, the IR dome may be axisymmetric and the IR system may not require mechanical gimballing. Elimination of the mechanical gimbal saves weight, volume, cost and complexity. Axisymmetric IR domes are less complicated to fabricate, hence less expensive.
(16) In this embodiment, IR system 14 comprises a boresighted strapdown IR seeker 40 with an axisymmetric (hemispheric) dome 22. The strapdown IR seeker 40 comprises an optical telescope 42 and one or more Focal Plane Arrays (PFAs) 44. The optical telescope focuses an enlarged image onto the one or more FPAs for image digitization. The optical telescope combines a number of optical elements e.g. reflective mirrors and/or optical lenses. The telescope may comprise primary, secondary, and possible tertiary optical elements and beam splitters for multiple color FPA input. Once digitized the on board computer can determine target motion to calculate the proper maneuver commands for ultimate interception. The optical telescope has no moving parts, hence is easier and less expensive to produce with greater reliability.
(17) In this embodiment, the IR seeker is a two-color system. The optical telescope includes a primary mirror 45 and a secondary mirror 46 that focus an enlarged image through a hole 47 in bulkhead 48. A sunshade 49 prevents extraneous light from entering the optical system. A beam splitter (not shown) behind the bulkhead splits the focused light into first and second colors and directs the respective colors to a first FPA 50 and a second FPA (not shown). An Inertial Measurement Unit 52 is also mounted behind the bulkhead.
(18) In an alternate embodiment, additional AESA arrays 60 may be deployed at other locations on the interceptor to increase the FOR for RF target engagement or RF communications. The individual and combined beam patterns for the AESA arrays 30 deployed on the forward surfaces of the fins are limited to project in a generally forward direction from the interceptor. In most scenarios this should be sufficient for RF target engagement. However, this configuration does limit the capability for RF communications to communication stations (other inerceptors, other airborne vehicles for advanced cueing, ground stations) that are in front of the interceptor. Additional AESA arrays 60 could be deployed in a side-looking on side-facing surfaces 62 of the dorsal fins, or on an aft-facing surface 64 of the dorsal fin. The arrays on the aft-facing surfaces would be covered with a radome element 66 similar to the forward-facing arrays. The arrays on the side-facing surfaces would be covered with a flat radome element 68.
(19) Referring now to
(20) Referring now to
(21) In a configuration, the gain response 120 of an individual AESA array 112 has a 1-way 3 dB beamwidth 122 that is asymmetric in Az and El depending on the orientation of the fin. The large gap between the apertures (arrays) creates multiple grating lobes in the response. Concurrent independent operation of the individual arrays can be facilitated by use of mutually orthogonal waveforms and frequency diversity for each array. The control circuitry should control the independent beam patterns to avoid attempting to look through the interceptor body, or to ignore the return should the beam look through the interceptor body.
(22) In this configuration, the gain response 130 of the full AESA array has numerous grating lobes 132 with a 1-way 3 dB beamwidth that is approximately symmetric in AZ and El and considerably narrower than that of a single array. The 1-way gain of the full AESA array is significantly greater than that of a single array. The large central obscuration caused by the missile body creates numerous grating lobes when the four arrays are combined to form a full array. Angles derived from the full array must be disambiguated (i.e. the angle measurement must be attributed to the correct lobe). For disambiguation, it may be sufficient to combine the target state estimates from the independent fin arrays. In fact, the fused target state may be good enough to make forming the full array unnecessary. The control circuitry should control the individual beam patterns to avoid attempting to look through the interceptor body to form a combined beam pattern, or to ignore the individual return should the beam look through the interceptor body as part of the combined return.
(23) Referring now to
(24) Referring now to
(25) While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such variations and alternate embodiments are contemplated, and can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.