GOLF COURSE-COMPATIBLE MODIFIED GOLF GAME
20170001088 · 2017-01-05
Inventors
Cpc classification
A63B24/0084
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A63B2225/01
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A63B24/0075
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A63B67/02
HUMAN NECESSITIES
F42B6/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
A63B71/0622
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A method of playing a game on a conventional golf hole having a tee region, a fairway region, a green region and a target includes loosing an arrow having an aerodynamic arrow head with a bow from the tee region or fairway region towards the green region until the arrow reaches a predetermined distance from the target, determining a number of times the arrow is loosed on the golfhole until the arrow lands within the predetermined distance from the target, and determining a score for the golf hole in response to the number of times the arrow is loosed on the golf hole and an approximate distance between the arrow and the target.
Claims
1. A method of playing a game on a conventional golf hole having a tee region, a fairway region, and a green region having a target comprising: loosing an arrow having an aerodynamic arrow head with a bow from the tee region or fairway region towards the green region until the arrow reaches the green region; determining a number of times the arrow is loosed on the golfhole until the arrow lands on the green region; after the arrow lands on the green region, determining a score for the golf hole in response to the number of times the arrow is loosed on the golf hole and an approximate distance between the arrow and the target.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the score for the golf hole further comprises: determining the score for the golf hole by combining the number of times the arrow is loosed on the golf hole and an additional number; wherein the additional number is determined in response to the approximate distance between the arrow and the target.
3. The method of claim 3 wherein the additional number is a first number when the approximate distance between the arrow and the target is within a first range of distances away from the target; and wherein the additional number is a second number when the approximate distance between the arrow and the target is within a second range of distances from the target.
4. The method of claim 2 further comprising displaying, using an augmented reality device, a virtual image representing one or more ranges of distances away from the target; and determining the additional number in response to a range of distances away from the target the arrow is visually determined to be within.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein loosing the arrow having the aerodynamic arrow head with the bow further comprises loosing the arrow to the fairway region; wherein the determining the score for the golf hole is also in response to one or more accuracy numbers; and wherein the one or more accuracy numbers are determined in response to loosing the arrow to the fairway region and one or more targets positioned within the fairway region.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the one or more targets positioned within the fairway region are selected from a group consisting of: physical targets disposed within the fairway region, and virtual targets disposed within the fairway region using an augmented reality system.
7. The method of claim 1: wherein prior to the loosing the arrow to the fairway region, the method includes displaying, using an augmented reality device, a virtual image within the fairway region.
8. The method of claim 7: wherein subsequent to loosing the arrow to the fairway region, the method includes displaying, using an augmented reality device, a virtual image representing one or more ranges of distances away from the virtual image within the fairway region; determining an accuracy number in response to a range of distances away from the virtual image the arrow is visually determined to be within in the fairway; and wherein the determining the score for the golf hole is also in response to one or more accuracy numbers.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the virtual image is selected from a group consisting of: an animated object, a stationary object, a target virtually disposed within the fairway, a target virtually disposed above the fairway, a cartoon character, a target ring, text, and a building.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein the virtual image is selected from a group consisting of: a tree, a bush, a rock, a hazard, a river, a sand bunker, out of bounds markers, a building, a person, a water hazard, an animated object, and a stationary object.
11. A method of playing a game on a conventional golf hole having a tee region, a fairway region, a green region and a target comprising: loosing an arrow having an aerodynamic arrow head with a bow from the tee region or fairway region towards the green region until the arrow reaches a predetermined distance from the target; determining a number of times the arrow is loosed on the golfhole until the arrow lands within the predetermined distance from the target; and determining a score for the golf hole in response to the number of times the arrow is loosed on the golf hole and an approximate distance between the arrow and the target.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein determining the score for the golf hole further comprises: determining the score for the golf hole by combining the number of times the arrow is loosed on the golf hole and an additional number; wherein the additional number is a first number when the approximate distance between the arrow and the target is within a first range of distances away from the target; and wherein the additional number is a second number when the approximate distance between the arrow and the target is within a second range of distances from the target.
13. The method of claim 12 further comprising displaying, using an augmented reality device, a virtual image representing one or more ranges of distances away from the target; and determining the additional number in response to a range of distances away from the target the arrow is visually determined to be within.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein regions within the predetermined distance from the target are selected from a group consisting of: regions only within the green region, and regions within the green regions and regions outside the green region.
15. The method of claim 12 wherein loosing the arrow having the aerodynamic arrow head with the bow further comprises loosing the arrow to the fairway region; wherein determining the score for the golf hole is also in response to one or more accuracy numbers; wherein the one or more accuracy numbers are determined in response to loosing the arrow to the fairway region and one or more targets positioned within the fairway region; and wherein the one or more targets positioned within the fairway region are selected from a group consisting of: physical targets disposed within the fairway region, and virtual targets disposed within the fairway region using an augmented reality system.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein prior to the loosing the arrow to the fairway region, the method includes displaying, using an augmented reality device, a virtual image within the fairway region.
17. The method of claim 16: wherein subsequent to loosing the arrow to the fairway region, the method includes determining whether the arrow is within a range of distances away from the virtual image within in the fairway; and wherein determining the score for the golf hole is also in response to whether the arrow is within the range of distances away from the virtual image.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the virtual image is selected from a group consisting of: an animated object, a stationary object, a target virtually disposed within the fairway, a target virtually disposed above the fairway, a cartoon character, a target ring, text, and a building; and wherein determining the score for the golf hole comprises subtracting a whole or fractional stroke when the arrow is within the range of distances away from the virtual image.
19. The method of claim 17 wherein the virtual image is selected from a group consisting of: a tree, a bush, a rock, a hazard, a river, a sand bunker, out of bounds markers, a building, a person, a water hazard, an animated object, and a stationary object; and wherein determining the score for the golf hole comprises adding a whole or fractional stroke when the arrow is within the range of distances away from the virtual image.
20. The method of claim 11 wherein determining the score for the golf hole is also in response to a bow draw weight.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019] In order to more fully understand the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings are not to be considered limitations in the scope of the invention, the presently described embodiments and the presently understood best mode of the invention are described with additional detail through use of the accompanying drawings in which:
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0030] The present invention relates to golf. More specifically, the present invention relates to apparatus and methods for playing golf on a conventional golf course that brings new players to the course and are accepted for play by golf courses. To facilitate this goal, the inventors of the present invention have developed an arrow that can fly distances similar to golf balls, and that is safer than golf balls to other players on a golf course.
[0031] In various embodiments, the inventors believe that arrows used in the present modified golf game should have a distance potential at least on par with conventional golf balls (e.g. over 200 yards). With such a distance potential, a player may play along with conventional golfers in their foursome, and keep up. Additionally, the inventors believe that various embodiments of arrows should be adaptable for use on a wide range of bows (with different bow weights). This is to reduce the start-up costs of new players, among other factors.
[0032] These above considerations are balanced against the inventors' concerns for playability. More particularly, to reduce the chance for injury to other golfers on a golf course, in various embodiments, the inventors have engineered the weight of the arrows to be less than a conventional golf ball (e.g. less than about 46 g). Because of this, the kinetic energy of a golf ball hitting the ground at 220 yards will be greater than the kinetic energy of embodiments of the arrow hitting the ground at the same distance. Additionally, the inventors have designed the shape of the safety arrow head to be blunt such that it is virtually impossible to accidentally penetrate human skin. With a large, blunt shape, the safety arrow head provides a large impact area, so that the arrow impact force per square inch is reduced.
[0033]
[0034] As discussed above, two of the inventors' competing considerations in selecting appropriate components for an aerodynamic safety arrow include: weight and adaptability.
[0035] In various embodiments, the inventors translate the adaptability factor to arrow stiffness, or arrow spine. More specifically, in various embodiments, the inventors consider arrows having a lower spine distance as being more adaptable to different bows than to arrows having a higher spine. For example, one arrow having a 1 inch spine may be adapted for use on bows within a range of about 20 lbs. to about 40 lbs., whereas another arrow having a 0.5 inch spine may be adapted for use on bows within a range of about 20 lbs. to about 60 lbs. In some specific embodiments, an arrow that has a high stiffness and can be used on bows within a range of 20 lbs. to about 75 lbs. In other embodiments, arrows may be designed for smaller ranges of bow strengths. For example, a first arrow may have a stiffness adapted for use on a bow within a range of about 20 lbs to about 40 lbs, a second arrow may have a stiffness adapted for use on a bow within a range of about 35 lbs to about 50 lbs, a third arrow may have a stiffness adapted for use on a bow within a range of about 50 lbs to about 75 lbs, or other ranges.
[0036] A competing consideration to stiffness is arrow weight. In various embodiments, the inventors recognize that arrow spine is often related to weight of shaft portion 110. For example, in the Easton XX75 Jazz arrow series, a first arrow has a spine of about 2.5 and a weight of about 10 grams, a second arrow has a spine of about 1.1 and a weight of about 15.5 grams, and a third arrow has a spine of about 0.53 and a weight of about 22.0 grams. As can be seen, spine distance and weight are typically inversely related. In one specific embodiment of the present invention, shaft portion 110 is an Easton X2315 arrow shaft having a spine of 0.34 and a weight of about 25 grams. Accordingly, such an embodiment is suitable for 25 lb. bows all the way up to 75 lb. bows. In other embodiments, different arrow shafts may be selected having lower weights and may be adapted to smaller ranges of bows. In some embodiments, arrow shafts may be made of any material, such as metal, carbon fiber, plastic, wood, fiber glass, or the like. In other embodiments, the arrow shafts may float on water.
[0037] In various embodiments, a fletching portion 120 may include any number of conventional plastic or feather fins. In some cases three or more fins may be used, and in some cases fewer than three fins (e.g. zero) may also be used. In various embodiments the fletching may be oriented in a straight, offset (spiral), helical, or other configuration. In other embodiments, non-conventional fletching such as FOB may be used.
[0038]
[0039] In various embodiments, the inventors also balance various performance considerations in determining the shape of arrow head 130. Some considerations include the weight of arrow head 130, the shape of arrow head 130, the drag of arrow head 130, energy absorbing capability of arrow head 130, and the like. Numerous embodiments of arrow head 130 are disclosed further in the figures and description below.
[0040]
[0041] In various embodiments, legs 230 help define an arrow head having an external semicircular or ball-shaped or a head with a reduced number of sharp edges, e.g. a geodesic dome. The inventors believe that a wide-diameter 240 arrow head 200 is typically associated with greater air resistance and thus such an arrow would have a shorter flight distance. However, such a wide-diameter arrow head 200 would have a bigger impact area and thus such an arrow would hurt a person or the ground less. Because arrows typically cannot hook, slice, or be affected by the wind as much as a conventional golf ball, the inventors believe that the chance of unintentionally hitting another golfer with an aerodynamic safety arrow is lower than with a golf ball. Accordingly, in various embodiments, arrow heads 200 have a cross-sectional diameter (e.g. about 34 mm) that is smaller than a cross-sectional diameter of a typical golf ball (e.g. 42.7 mm). To further reduce air resistance, as illustrated in
[0042] In various embodiments, the material of arrow head 200 is relatively flexible. Accordingly, if an arrow were to strike a hard object (e.g. person, tree, the ground), energy is dissipated by legs 230 bending, and an interior cavity 260 temporarily decreasing in volume. In
[0043] In some embodiments, arrow head 200 may include a central support extending from the arrow shaft until the blunt end portion 210. The central support may be used to hold an internal weight. The internal weight may be formed of metal or other dense material and can be added to modify the arrow front of center (center of gravity). In one embodiment, the FOC is approximately 18.33, although this may vary according to desired performance characteristics. In some embodiments, arrow head 200 may have a total weight on the order of about 6 grams to about 17 grams.
[0044]
[0045] In the example in
[0046] As can be seen in
[0047] In the example in
[0048] In the example in
[0049] In the example in
[0050] In the example in
[0051] In the example in
[0052]
[0053] In the example illustrated in
[0054]
[0055]
[0056] As also shown in
[0057]
[0058] As illustrated in
[0059] In practice, embodiment of the present invention travel much farther than what the inventors initially hoped their safety arrows would travel. Additionally, in surprising contrast to conventional arrows that tend to flip or stall-out when shot at long distances, embodiments of the present invention maintain a highly parabolic curve when playing the modified golf game.
[0060] Various embodiments include combining Augmented Reality [AR] and/or Mixed Reality [MR] and/or [in highly specialized and limited environments] Virtual Reality [VR] to the embodiments of the game of AeroGolf described herein. In augmented reality embodiments, non-physical virtual images augment a player's vision, such that the virtual object become a part of the hole and course. In some embodiments, the virtual images may be shared among other players or observers on a hole (e.g. a common virtual water hazard) or the virtual images may be unique to the players (e.g. distance targets based upon individual players' bow draw weights.
[0061]
[0062] Initially, a user or a golf course obtains aerodynamic safety arrows, step 700. In various embodiments, it is believed that embodiments of the safety arrows described above, provide surprising levels of safety and performance.
[0063] Next, a user locates a golf course that is certified and/or for modified golf, step 710. As seen firsthand by the inventors of the present invention, there is great resistance by traditional golf courses in general to new ideas. However, with the introduction of the herein described aerodynamic safety arrow, the inventors have proven to traditional golf courses that modified golf is actually much safer to other golfers on a golf course and less damaging to the fairways and greens than ordinary golf balls. Some golf courses have reported that their insurance companies do not require any additional insurance to support modified golf, so long as safety arrows, as disclosed herein are used for modified golf. Accordingly, it is contemplated that approved safety arrows and possibly other equipment, will be required by golf courses, step 720.
[0064] In various embodiments, it is contemplated that to play modified golf, a player need a minimum of one bow to play modified golf. However, in alternative embodiments, a player may have one bow for long range shots, e.g. +200 yards, and a lower bow weight for shorter range shots, e.g. 50 yards. In various embodiments, the player selects a bow appropriate for the shot, step 730.
[0065] In one embodiment, illustrated in
[0066] In one embodiment, as illustrated in
[0067] In various embodiments, based upon the virtual image, the user draws, aims and looses the arrow, step 910. In various embodiments, the virtual image may be a target, such that the user specifically aims her bow toward the target. As examples, the virtual target may be a bulls-eye target, a flag, a cartoon character, or the like. In other examples, the virtual image may be a hazard, such that the user specifically avoids aiming her bow towards the hazard. As examples, the virtual hazard may be a water hazard, one or more trees, a sand bunker, locations of golfers on the same hole, and the like.
[0068] After the arrow lands on the fairway or green, a distance between the virtual image and the arrow is determined. This can be performed based upon the GPS coordinates of the location of the arrow relative to the location of the virtual image within the augmented reality system. As can be seen referencing
[0069] In various embodiments, if the arrow is subject to the virtual target, a determination is made whether the virtual target is a virtual hazard (e.g. bush) or a virtual bonus, step 930. In some embodiments, if the virtual target is a hazard, the user is subject to a penalty, step 940, and if the virtual target is a bonus, the user is subject to a bonus, step 950. Using traditional golf scoring convention, a penalty may include adding strokes to the user's score, and a bonus may include subtracting strokes to the user's score. Using other scoring conventions, the penalty may include reducing a score, and a bonus may include raising a score. In various embodiments, the bonus or penalty may include integer increments (e.g. +1, 1 strokes), or the bonus or penalty may include non-integer increments (e.g. +0.1, +0.25, 0.5, 0.75 strokes). In some embodiments, the user's score may also be incremented to account for the loose in step 910, step 960.
[0070] Additionally, in some embodiments, the virtual image may react to the user hitting or missing the virtual region. For example, if a region on a fairway is associated with a Pokmon character, e.g. region 880, in
[0071] In various embodiments, when the green is reached, step 760, there are different ways to continue the modified golf game, as illustrated in
[0072] The embodiment illustrated in
[0073] In various embodiments, an augmented reality type of system may be used to help facilitate any one of steps 705-745. For example, using an augmented reality system, a virtual series of target rings may be automatically superimposed about a target for the user. Based upon the virtual rings, the user could easily see which ring their arrow falls within for scoring purposes, thus no physical measurement is required. In some embodiments, the system may also automatically increment the user's score (e.g. steps 715-745).
[0074] If there additional holes to play, step 755, the game continues to step 730. Otherwise, the player's score is the sum of strokes/shots, step 775. In various embodiments, the decision whether to putt or to use the virtual target of
[0075]
[0076] Using an augmented reality device, as described above, a user may also be subject to one or more virtual images associated with region 880. In one example a virtual image may be a virtual hazard, a grove of trees. In such an example, if the player on path 830 shoots into, above, or in virtual hazard 880, the player may be penalized a stroke. In another example, a virtual image may be a bonus region. In this example, if the player on path 830 shoots into, though, or lands within bonus region 880, the player may be awarded a mulligan, a negative stroke, a new car, or the like.
[0077] With respect to hole 810, several differences can be seen. In particular, instead of shooting for the pin 840, for this hole, the players aim for a marker or spot 850 approximately in the middle of the green. Additionally, the scoring distances need not be concentric about marker 850. Using a GPS unit, the location a player's arrow lands on the green can be electronically marked by a player, and the number of strokes to add to a player's score can be electronically determined. Accordingly, the scoring zones need not be regular in shape, and the player need not physical measure the distance to the target with a tape measurer. Various embodiments of the present invention may include a GPS device integrated into an aerodynamic safety arrow.
[0078] With respect to hole 810, two player shots/strokes are illustrated by paths 860 and 870. For the first layer, following path 860, the player reaches the green in two strokes, coming very close to the pin. However, the player shot for the wrong target, and is assessed three strokes for falling within the third ring around marker 850. The first player thus has five strokes for hole 810. For the second player, following path 870, the player reaches the green in one stroke; and (in this example) because the safety arrow overlies the marker, has one stroke taken away from her score (the goose). The second player thus has zero strokes for hole 810, or a Hole in None.
[0079] In other embodiments, other types of scoring bonuses (negative strokes) or penalties (positive strokes) may be added. In one example, termed The Condor, if the player uses a 40 lb. bow or above and releases an arrow that lands on the green from 150 yards away, one stroke may be taken away; and if the player uses a bow under 40 lbs. and releases an arrow that lands on the green from 75 yards away, one stroke may also be taken away. Different combinations of the above may also be provided. As an example, if a player shoots a Condor and a Goose with one shot, the player has negative one stroke for the hole.
[0080] In various embodiments for two equally skilled players, more than likely player one with the higher bow weight will likely beat player two. Accordingly, the inventors have developed a handicapping system that attempts to reduce the effect of the higher bow weight on the players' scores. In one example, for the following formula is used for player 1 (the player with the stronger bow):
P1=((P1P2)/(P1W/P2W))+P1
[0081] In this equation, P1 and P2 are the number of strokes for player 1 and player 2, respectively; P1W and P2W are the bow weights for player 1 and player 2, respectively; and P1 is the adjusted score for player 1. As an example of this, suppose P1=76 strokes; P1W=60 lbs.; P2=86 strokes; and P2W=30 lbs. Using this example, P1=81 strokes ((8676)/(60/30)+76). Using such a handicap, player 1's adjusted score is 81 strokes, and player 1 still beats player 2, who has 86 strokes. In other embodiments, different mechanisms for handicapping are contemplated.
[0082]
[0083] In still other embodiments of the present invention, augmented reality may be used to simulate entire holes of a golf course. Such embodiments, would allow arrow golf to be played outdoors (e.g. confined area) or even indoors (e.g. in a warehouse). Embodiments may use higher aerodynamic drag safety arrows to reduce the arrow distance, tethered safety arrows, or the like.
[0084] Illustrated in
[0085] In other embodiments, combinations or sub-combinations of the above disclosed invention can be advantageously made. For example, in other embodiments of the present invention, an arrow head itself may have a series of vanes (e.g.
[0086] In other embodiments, different types of games may be played using embodiments of the aerodynamic safety arrows. The block diagrams of the architecture and flow charts are grouped for ease of understanding. However it should be understood that combinations of blocks, additions of new blocks, re-arrangement of blocks, and the like are contemplated in alternative embodiments of the present invention.
[0087] The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.