Selective area coating sintering
20170001918 ยท 2017-01-05
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C23C24/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C24/106
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
H01J37/32009
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
The present disclosure is directed to a variable sintered coating or a variable microstructure coating as well as an apparatus and method of making such a variable coating onto substrates. The substrate has some electrical conductivity and is used as one electrode while an ionized gas is used as the other electrode that is moved over the areas of the powder coating to be sintered. An electrical current is used to cause a plasma produced through the gas, resulting in a combined energy and temperature profile sufficient for powder-powder and powder-substrate bonding. This preferred method is referred to as flame-assisted flash sintering (FAFS).
Claims
1. A method of manufacturing a coated area with variable amounts of sintering, the method comprising: a) providing a substrate having an exposed first surface, b) disposing powder onto said first surface of said substrate to form a powder layer d) providing a gas capable of creating an electric plasma, e) providing a conduit capable of dispensing said plasma generating gas toward said powder layer on said substrate, f) creating a gas flow that closely enough connects a first electrode to the plasma generating gas so that a high voltage current can pass through the gas and powder layer to said substrate, which is at a second electrical potential, g) electrically energizing said electrode causing a current flow through said gas and the powder layer, h) wherein said electrical potential enhances the powder sintering and creates a net electrical flow of at least 1 mA, and i) consolidating said powder on said substrate in said current flow area,
2. A device for sintering a powder coating on to a substrate comprising: a) at least one gas source capable of supplying an ionizing gas b) a gas delivery means, capable of delivering at least one gas to or close to at least one electrode c) said electrode capable of producing an electric current sufficient through the gas to produce a plasma d) an electrical circuit configured to flow current through said plasma and a powder to be sintered e) a controller or electrical circuit capable of controlling current or voltage f) a traversing means capable of traversing said electrode or moving said substrate while said plasma is energized with current so that a sintered pattern can be achieved.
3. A variable microstructure inorganic-coated substrate or released film, comprising: a) a substrate having a powder on its surface, b) said powder on said substrate being in a state of variation in sintering over the scale of 30 microns or less.
4. The coating in claim 3 wherein the substrate is an electrical conductor or a semiconductor, or a composite containing a conductor or a semiconductor.
5. The coating of claim 3 wherein the powder is a ceramic, metalloid, metal, or semiconductor.
6. The coating of claim 3 wherein the powder has an electrical conductivity less than that of said substrate.
7. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure changes occur with negligible composition variation.
8. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure changes occur over distances of less than 10 microns.
9. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure changes occur over distances of less than 3 microns.
10. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure change is a grain size change of at least 2 times.
11. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure change is a grain size change of at least 4 times.
12. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure change is a necking between particles width change of at least 2 times.
13. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure change is a necking between particles width change of at least 4 times.
14. The coating of claim 3 wherein the microstructure is sufficient for the more sintered areas being stable while the less sintered areas can be removed by a removal process to which all areas are subjected.
15. The coating of claim 14 wherein the removal process is a mechanical process such as brushing or being subjected to a fluid flow or ultrasonic excited fluid.
16. The method in claim 1 where the said gas is a flammable mixture and electrode that is close to or in a flame.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein said flame is in the temperature range of 1000 C. to 3000 C. and produces chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a plasma.
18. The method of 16 wherein said flame produces chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a flame plasma and the electrical potential creates an arc-like plasma in the flame that rasters over the coating and produces small-scale microstructural variations.
19. The method of claim 1 wherein the gas flow over the surface is moved such that the area of current flow does not cover all the coating resulting in areas of more sintered material where the gas makes contract with the coating.
20. The method of claim 1 wherein a plasma occurs at a voltage and current at least less than one-half of that possible without the ionizing gas in the ambient gas composition.
21. The method of claim 1 wherein the electric arc is traversed over select areas where coating material is desired to remain for the product being made and subsequently the more sintered powder layer is removed when the substrate is subject to a cleaning or unsintered powder removal method.
22. The method of claim 1 wherein the method is repeated at least twice over the substrate where the resulting coating is thicker or has layers of different composition.
23. The device of claim 2 additionally comprising the gas source being a flammable gas fuel.
24. The device of claim 2 additionally comprising a fuel delivery means, such as a control valve, mass-flow controller or rotometer, capable of delivering at least one gaseous fuel to a torch.
25. The device of claim 2 additionally comprising a torch capable of producing a flame of sufficient temperature to produce chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a flame plasma.
26. The device of claim 2 additionally comprising an electrical circuit configured to apply at least part of the range of 100 V to 5000 V of electrical potential and control a desired flow of current of 2 mA to 300 mA through said gas.
27. The device of claim 2 wherein said traversing means is a robotic arm with multiple degrees of motion freedom so that the torch can be maintained near the same angle and distance to the substrate even when the substrate is a complex shape.
28. The device of claim 2 further comprising a substrate temperature controlling system that brings the coating and substrate to a desired temperature for processing.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] The images shown in
[0029]
[0030]
[0031] In
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035] Although flame-assisted flash sintering is capable of being used in a vacuum environment, with flames being stable to at least 15 torr, it is practically preferred for use in non-vacuum environments, enabling in-place applications, such as very large components, repair applications, and applications requiring challenging orientations, such as vertical or overhead surface coatings.
[0036] The localized control of sintering of material can also occur with a plasma not formed by a flame. There are many traditional forms of plasma and some that produce local control of the plasma. TIG torches produce an electric arc at atmospheric pressure, and there are more uniform field plasmas that are formed at reduced pressures. Lasers can ionize gas and heat the surface some in a manner to replace a flame. An ionizable gas is generally used to produce these plasmas. While the preferred method of making the electric current for sintering is a flame, these other forms of plasmas that yield an electric current flow through gas can also be used. To help control the location of the current flow yielding the sintering, the surrounding gas should be less ionizable than the surrounding gas. The surrounding gas should be preferably at least as ionizable, and more preferably at least 80% less ionizable. The voltage source should be close to or in the more ionizable gas flow, just as it should be for the flame when it is used to complete the electric circuit. Then, motion of the ionizable gas is relative to the substrate, and can be moved as desired to yield the areas of sintering wanted similar to when using the flame. A flame is an ionizable gas and is a form of chemically ionized gas, which makes the conduction of electricity easy. This makes the flame readily electrically ionizable. Ionizing gasses, without a flame, many sometimes require an initial high voltage or other energy form such as a laser to initiate the plasma.
[0037] Additionally, although FAFS was demonstrated for coating metals, it is applicable to any substrate having electrically even the smallest conductive properties. One only needs to pass milliamps of current through the substrate or a coating on the substrate with a high potential being applied.
[0038] Flame-assisted flash sintering may also be used for bonding or welding of material(s) to electron-passing surfaces. In this case, the material could be in a green, partially sintered, or fully sintered state. During bonding of the material, the material may also undergo partial or full sintering or grain growth. The material to be welded may be in the form of a green-state coating, as a tape or sheet, or a solid, shaped to conform to the substrate surface.
[0039] It is possible to sinter just desired areas with the FAFS process. If the material is in coating form, specific areas of the coating may be welded and sintered to the substrate by FAFS, and the unwelded and unsintered ceramic could be removed to expose the substrate in areas where no coating is desired. Unsintered material can be removed by many different processes, including washing, scrubbing, blowing, vibration, ultrasonic, and other known cleaning or removal methods. The FAFS process can be localized and it may be easier to define shapes and areas for the coating to remain than to mask or otherwise limit where the material is to be applied to the substrate.
[0040] It is also possible to run the selective sintering process such that the surface is sintered but the bonding to the substrate is weak, so that a sintered free standing sheet is created, as shown in
[0041] For the examples described, the following preparations were made. A slurry was made for coating metal substrates. The slurry or paste can be made in many ways, or purchased. The following is simply the method used and does not limit the FAFS process.
[0042] Oxide powder was added to a solvent and dispersed with an ultrasonic probe (e.g., Hielscher UIP100hd). Slurries were sonicated for 10 min at 75% amplitude while manually stirred in an ice bath to minimize solvent evaporation. Slurries were cooled to room temperature via the ice bath prior to use. Slurries have also been made by rolling with grinding media and rapid rotation mixing methods, but almost any mixing technique that makes a stable slurry, dispersion, or ink can be used. The end fractional amounts are approximate because some solvent is lost.
Example Slurry Recipes:
YSZ
[0043] 44.3 g Tosoh TZ-8YS YSZ powder
56.7 g n-butanol solvent/dispersant
Alumina
[0044] 35-40 g n-butanol solvent/dispersant
25 g of Baikalox BMA-15 Alumina powder
0.3-0.8 g Timcal SuperC65 Carbon Black powder
Alumina/YSZ Composite #1
[0045] 28.3 g n-butanol solvent/dispersant
20.5 g Tosoh TZ3YS20A YSZ/Alumina powder
0.3 g Timcal SuperC65 Carbon Black powder
0.5 g polyvinylpyrrolidone binder
Alumina/YSZ Composite #2
[0046] 8.8 g n-butanol solvent/dispersant
6.7 g Tosoh TZ-8YS YSZ powder+0.2 g Baikalox BMA-15 Alumina powder
[0047] The metal substrate was prepared as follows. After cutting to size and removal of masking adhesive, 0.075 or 0.125 thick substrates were cleaned with distilled ethanol in an ultrasonic bath cleaner for 15 min to remove any residual adhesive remaining on the substrate surface. After cleaning, substrates were rinsed in reverse osmosis or distilled water and sprayed dry with compressed air.
[0048] The slurry was applied as a coating onto the metal substrate as follows. Clean substrates were placed onto flattened sheets of aluminum foil and then onto the glass coating plate of a bench-top automated coating system. A wound-wire Meyer rod was cleaned by bath sonication in distilled ethanol and sprayed dry with compressed air. Cleaning cycles with ethanol were continued until the rod was completely clear of debris. With both the substrate and coating rod cleaned, the rod was inserted into the holder and lowered onto the substrate. Slurry was pipetted onto the substrate and the coating rod was drawn across. After coating, wet samples were transferred to a hot plate and dried for 5 min at 80-130 C. Once dry, coated substrates were inspected manually for defects and any excess coating was removed from the substrate back with a dust-free wipe.
[0049] Typical coating thicknesses for examples of alumina and YSZ/alumina composite samples were 12-15 m, while YSZ samples typically had a dried thickness of 25-30 m. A wide range of thicknesses have been processed. For the listed examples, the following equipment items were used when needed, but these items could be replaced with other equipment or set of components that perform similar functions: [0050] 1. The flame equipment used was a custom-built torch assembly consisting of a central flame (such as that produced by a Smith Little Torch with #5 tip) surrounded by a more diffuse annular flame. The latter flame is referred to as an auxiliary flame source because its primary purpose is to broaden the heat distribution and not to sinter the coating or deliver the plasma arc. The central flame torch typically protrudes from the auxiliary flame burner by 2 mm No second flame is needed for FAFS processing, but it can be helpful. [0051] 2. The voltage or current supplies used were a Stanford PS300 high voltage power supply, an Acopian P01HP60 high voltage power supply, and a Hoefer PS2500 high voltage power supply; they were used interchangeably and others can be used. [0052] 3. Alicat mass flow controllers, 0.5 SLPM and 2.0 SLPM (propane and O.sub.2, respectively), as well as manual rotometers. [0053] 4. Omega OMEGALUX infrared radiant panel heater (when needed). [0054] 5. Standard (industrial)-grade propane, methane, air, and oxygen gases. [0055] 6. A custom-made substrate chuck, made from type 309 stainless steel of dimensions 36. Any holder can be used but the substrate must be connected to the electrical circuit.
[0056] Using the equipment and materials prepared above, the examples listed below were made with the following process. Single-sided coated substrates were placed onto substrate chuck without clamping. The chuck was connected to electrical ground through a 100 k ballast resistor, and was positioned atop the substrate heater such that the chuck rested only on the ceramic surface of the heater and did not physically touch the metallic body of the heater. Electrical grounding issues may occur if the metallic chuck does touch the metallic heater body, which is in electrical contact with essentially all components of the FAFS system (enclosure, motor drives, etc.). The ballast resistor was connected in series with the negative side of the power supply and served to restrict the maximum current in the circuit. The ballast resistor was intentionally placed on the negative side of the circuit so that the positive voltage applied to the torch was not attenuated through additional resistance before any plasma was ignited. Note that the ballast resistor must be of a sufficient wattage rating to handle the power delivered to it: in these experiments, a 25-W ballast resistor of 100-150 k resistance was used. The resistor was found to help stabilize the power flow, but other means to finely control the electrical power, such as different circuitry or power supplies, can replace this or alter its value. We have successfully used over 90% lower resistances with stable FAFS processing.
[0057] The substrate heater was driven by a PID temperature controller and set to a temperature between 0 C. up to 800 C. In some cases, it was not necessary to use the substrate heater at all. This can be advantageous when one wishes not to heat the substrate material beyond the point of oxidation. It may even be best to cool the substrate.
[0058] The torch was clamped by an electrically insulating fixture onto a two-axis linear motion stage above, in the vicinity of the substrate heater and coated substrate. It is important that the torch be clamped using electrically insulating materials to prevent high voltage from being transferred to the motion system and thus the rest of the assembly. This is important both for operator safety and practical purposes, to avoid shorting the power supply to ground. The high voltage was supplied to the torch by means of an electrical spade lug that was silver-soldered to the body of the electrically conductive torch tip. A matching spade connector crimped onto the end of a cable (capable of withstanding high voltages) mates to the lug; this cable was connected to the positive terminal of the power supply.
[0059] A motion trajectory for the torch is determined and programmed into software that controls the motion of the entire three-axis system. It is useful to define a three-axis Cartesian coordinate system consisting of x, y, and z axes, such that the z-axis is parallel to the common understanding of vertical (up and down) movement, and the x-y plane is orthogonal to the z-axis. The trajectory used in all experiments to date consisted of holding the torch at a fixed height (z position) above the substrate surface while rastering along at a fixed speed in the x-y plane. At the end of each raster line (assuming rastering along the major axis, x), the substrate position is indexed in y and the torch returns to the initial x position. This pattern is repeated a number of times until the desired number of scan lines have been executed. Practical values used in our example experiments are shown in the table below, but wider ranges function. A robotic system can also be used.
TABLE-US-00001 z height 2.0-5.0 mm z trajectory speed 100-200 mm/min x trajectory speed 50-200 mm/min y trajectory speed 50-200 mm/min x scan length 25-75 mm y index position length 0.5-2.0 mm
[0060] Before electrically energizing the circuit, combustible gases are delivered to the torch and the flame is lit. Successful methods of gas delivery in these experiments included manual rotometer flow devices as well as electronic mass flow controllers designed to deliver precise amounts of gas. The latter has the advantage of creating a very stable flame, which is preferred to support a stable plasma. Fuel and oxidizing gases were delivered through separate mass flow controllers or rotometers and premixed within the torch assembly. Propane and oxygen were used as the primary fuel gases in these experiments. Methane was also tested as an acceptable fuel gas, but not in any of the incorporated examples. Air, oxygen, and argon mixed with oxygen, were demonstrated to be functional with the FAFS process. Various gases (or other fuel gases, such as butane and hydrogen) may be used once appropriate experimental conditions are ascertained.
[0061] By setting a voltage on the power supply, the FAFS circuit was energized. All experiments to date were performed as described above with the torch at a positive electrical potential with respect to the substrate chuck, and, by extension, the substrate. It may be that reversing the polarity of this voltage may show comparable or even greater success than the present configuration Changing the placement of the ballast resistor to the positive side of the circuit is also a modification that may be contemplated within the experimental parameters. It is noted that the torch is only electrically energized after lighting the combustible gases for safety reasons.
[0062] Voltages between 500 and 2000 V were applied to the torch (with respect to the substrate) to achieve currents ranging from 1 to 15 mA for the examples, but currents of 200 mA have been used and higher values are possible. The power supply may be controlled in constant current or constant voltage mode, as outlined in the proceeding examples. In theory, constant current mode should be preferable because the temperature increase due to the electrical current within the ceramic is proportional to power, and power is proportional to the square of the current multiplied by the ceramic resistance. As the ceramic resistance remains mostly constant, a change in current has a significant effect on the deposited power, and thus the temperature increase, within the ceramic. Variable sintering can also be obtained by purposefully adjusting current or voltage while processing, in which case non-constant electric potentials or currents are not just desired but purposefully created.
[0063] Once the flame is lit and the torch is electrically energized, the scanning motion trajectory begins, with the torch descending in the z-axis until it reaches the fixed height at which it will begin the x-y scanning motion. As the torch descends, it is sometimes necessary to also execute some x-y scanning motion so that a single point on the substrate does not get too hot. A typical value for this height is 2.5 mm, which provides enough space for stable combustion of the fuel-gas mixture before the primary combustion zone contacts the substrate surface. The z-height is an important parameter in the FAFS process, because the hottest section of the flame can reach temperatures in excess of 2,000 C., under certain combustion conditions, sufficient to oxidize, damage, or melt the surface of the ceramic coating or metal substrate. For this specific flame, use at a height of <1 mm may damage the coating due to erosion or extreme heat stress, while a height of >5 mm may be too far away from the surface to generate a stable plasma arc using the current torch apparatus. Other flames and torches will require different surface offsets, which can be determined by experimentation.
[0064] The nature of the FAFS process differs substantially between the two ceramic materials most studied and successfully demonstrated in this application, YSZ and alumina. In the case of YSZ, an extremely bright plasma was ignited as the torch approached a height of 3.8 mm Using a voltage of 850 V in constant voltage mode, the current generated was 2.5-13 mA. The substrate heater was set up to 1000 C. for 8YSZ but the substrate was not glowing red, so was much cooler than this. For YSZ conditions tried low temperatures tended to cause coating spalling or delamination. The plasma arc, which extended visibly from the torch tip to the substrate, moved rapidly and sporadically within the lateral extent of the combustion zone. For a x-y scanning speed of 25.4 mm/min, the 0.1-0.2 mm diameter plasma arc moved in such a way as to expose 50-80% of the ceramic coating within the lateral extent of the combustion zone.
[0065] Alumina with some carbon added, on the other hand, processed better when the substrate was not heated and the sample was at ambient temperature prior to processing. Using a current set point of 15 mA in constant current mode, the voltage obtained was of the order of 2,000 V. The nature of the plasma arc was fundamentally different than that of the 8YSZ case; luminescence was much less and a shower of multiple current arcs appeared rather than a single one. A high-frequency audible hissing sound was also typically heard in this case.
[0066] Once the scanning trajectory was complete, samples were either allowed to cool slowly to room temperature while residing on the substrate heater, or were instantly removed for examination. There was no noticeable difference observed between the two different cooling rates, although one may be preferable to the other upon closer examination in the future.
Example 1
[0067]
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Experimental parameters for Example 1. Flame + Heater Traverse ceramic Flame + ceramic SP Voltage Current speed resistance electrical ( C.) (V) (mA) (mm/min) (K) power (W) N/A 1500 8.0 50 50-100 3.2-6.4 Nozzle Auxiliary height nozzle Propane Powder Flame + plasma H height flow O.sub.2 flow size arc diameter (mm) (mm) (sccm) (sccm) (nm) (mm) 4.5 5.5 175 390 150 0.8-1.0
[0068]
[0069]
Example 2
[0070] In this example, the voltage was manually pulsed on and off to induce a variation in sintering across the sample surface. This modulation can engineer strain relief into the coating to avoid spallation, and can be done to selectively sinter for other benefits or selective removal processing. An appropriate analogy is designing cracks in concrete slabs to prevent the concrete from cracking as it expands and contracts. The coating is the alumina/YSZ composite #2, described above. The frequency of switching the voltage off and on was approximately 1 Hz. The frequency and speed can be adjusted to create the optimal pattern. The power supply was operated in constant-voltage mode. When the same FAFS process conditions were used without the pulsing, the coating would crack or spall in many areas.
[0071] Varying the current and voltage have another benefit in ending spot arcing. Spot arcing occurs when a low resistance spot is present through the coating and the arc stays located there for an extended time, with the arc stretching beyond the inner flame or ionizing gas stream, which excessively processes this spot and ends up underprocessing nearby coating. By effectively shutting off the arc and reestablishing it, the new point will be very close to the ionizing gas stream or flame.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Experimental Parameters for Example 2 Flame + Heater Traverse ceramic Flame + ceramic SP Voltage Current speed resistance electrical ( C.) (V) (mA) (mm/min) (K) power (W) 950 1700 11.5 200 48 6.3 Nozzle Auxiliary height nozzle Propane Powder Flame + plasma H height flow O.sub.2 flow size arc diameter (mm) (mm) (sccm) (sccm) (nm) (mm) 2.5 3.5 80 390 180 0.8-1.0
Example 3
[0072]
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Experimental Parameters for Example 3. Flame + Heater Traverse ceramic Flame + ceramic SP Voltage Current speed resistance electrical ( C.) (V) (mA) (mm/min) (K) power (W) 700 750 2.5 25-250 100-200 1.6 Nozzle Auxiliary height nozzle Propane Powder Plasma arc H height flow O.sub.2 flow size diameter (mm) (mm) (sccm) (sccm) (nm) (mm) 2.25 N/A 100 370 200 .070-0.10
[0073]
[0074] The shiny lines in
Example 4
[0075] Example 4 illustrates the hardness of a processed FAFS coating.
Experimental Parameters for Example 4.
[0076]
TABLE-US-00005 Heater Traverse Flame + SP Voltage Current speed ceramic Flame + ceramic ( C.) (V) (mA) (mm/min) resistance electrical N/A 2000 14 50 43 8.4 Nozzle height Auxiliary Propane Powder Flame + plasma H nozzle flow O.sub.2 flow size arc diameter (mm) height (sccm) (sccm) (nm) (mm) 2.3 3.3 90 370 200 0.8-1.0
[0077] The results achieved differed widely from those achieved by flame or arc plasma alone. On both YSZ and LSM coatings, flame-only processing was performed and nominal or no sintering was achieved and the adhesion was very poor. A much higher current TIG welder was tried with the YSZ coating and the arc would jump from spot to spot where, it is believed, there was a lower electrical resistance to the powder coating. With the right conditions and lower current, TIG-treated material from a steady plasma arc should be scanned continuously over the surface to also achieve variable sintering. Also, any ionized gas stream used to propagate an electric arc could be used to create the features and microstructures of this invention.
[0078] The FAFS process uses a flame to define a path where the plasma arc is restricted and then the flame can be traversed or moved relatively over the area to be treated. Additionally, the flame has some conductivity and can support a lower resistance path, so that a lower power plasma arc can exist versus non-flame-based plasma arcs. The plasma is a composite of both a flame plasma and an electric arc plasma, which enables a lower current flow than is required to sustain a pure electric arc, so that the right amount of energy to properly sinter, without damaging the powder coating or substrate, can be achieved more readily. With appropriate equipment and setting, a non-flame pure arc plasma could achieve selective sintering. Other energy sources, such as a laser, can be used to excite an initial plasma that can be used in place of the flame to control the location of the electric sintering beam or arc. The current and voltage required to form an arc plasma is known to vary with the composition of the gas medium. Another significant factor is pressure, and under reduced pressure, electric plasmas are more stable at lower current flows. Of course, any air that might be entrained should be included in the gas mix, so some form of enclosure or localized gas flow control would be necessary. The flame or heater helps to bring the coating material up to a temperature where electric current sintering can be effective.
[0079] The powder coating should be of good quality without coating material lacking in the area of processing. While the flame does control the zone of the electric plasma are, if there are holes or cracks in the coating, the arc can try to move to these areas of a lower resistance path and will jump over or move quickly by areas where the coating has significantly higher resistance.
[0080] Coating contaminants should be minimized, as is the case for most coating methods. Some contaminants might dramatically alter the melting point or resistance of the coating and result in different coating morphologies or properties as well as difficult to control currents or voltages. As with many processes, cleaner or more consistent properties are better. There could be benefits to some additional materials on processing, but uniformity is helpful in maintaining operating conditions.
[0081] Embodiments of the present invention include: [0082] 1. A method of manufacturing a coated area with variable amounts of sintering, the method comprising: [0083] a. providing a substrate having an exposed first surface, [0084] b. providing a powder having of a plurality of particles, [0085] c. disposing said powder to said first surface of said substrate to form a powder layer [0086] d. providing a gas capable of creating an electric plasma, [0087] e. providing an orifice capable of dispensing said plasma generating gas toward said powder layer on said substrate, [0088] f. creating a gas flow that connects a first electrode to the plasma generating gas so that a high voltage current can pass through the gas and powder layer to said substrate which is at a second electrical potential, [0089] g. electrically energizing said electrode causing a current flow through said gas and the powder layer, [0090] h. wherein said electrical potential enhances the powder sintering and creates a net electrical flow of at least 1 mA, and [0091] i. consolidating said powder on said substrate in said current flow area, [0092] 2. A device for sintering a powder coating on to a substrate comprising: [0093] a. at least one gas source capable of supplying a ionizing gas [0094] b. a gas delivery means, capable of delivering at least one gas to at least one electrode [0095] c. said electrode capable of producing an electric current sufficient through the gas to produce a plasma [0096] d. an electrical circuit configured to flow current through said plasma [0097] e. a controller or electrical circuit capable of controlling current or voltage [0098] f. a traversing means capable of traversing said electrode or moving said substrate while said plasma is energized with current. [0099] 3. A variable microstructure inorganic coated substrate or released film, comprising: [0100] a. a substrate having a powder on its surface. [0101] b. said powder on said substrate being in a state of variation in sintering over the scale of 30 microns or less. [0102] 4. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the substrate is an electrical conductor or a semiconductor, or composite containing a conductor or a semiconductor. [0103] 5. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the powder is a ceramic, metalloid, metal or semiconductor. [0104] 6. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the powder has an electrical conductivity less than that of said substrate. [0105] 7. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure changes occur with negligible composition variation. [0106] 8. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure changes occur over distances of less than 10 microns. [0107] 9. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure changes occur over distances of less than 3 microns. [0108] 10. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure change is a grain size change of at least 2 times. [0109] 11. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure change is a grain size change of at least 4 times. [0110] 12. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure change is a necking between particles width change of at least 2 times. [0111] 13. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure change is a necking between particles width change of at least 4 times. [0112] 14. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure is sufficient for the more sintered areas being stable while the less sintered areas can be removed by a removal process to which all areas are subjected. [0113] 15. The coating of 14. (above) wherein the removal process is a mechanical process such as brushing or being subjected to a fluid flow. [0114] 16. The method in 1. (above) where the gas is a flammable mixture and electrode that is adjacent to or in a flame. [0115] 17. The method in 16. (above) wherein said flame is in the temperature range of 1000 C. to 3000 C. and produces chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a plasma. [0116] 18. The method in 16. (above) wherein said flame produces chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a flame plasma and the electrical potential creates an arc-like plasma in the flame that raster's over the coating and produces small scale microstructure variations. [0117] 19. The method in 1. (above) wherein the gas flow over the surface is moved such that the area of current flow does not cover all the coating resulting in areas of more sintered material where the gas makes contract with the coating. [0118] 20. The method in 1. (above) wherein a plasma occurs at a voltage and current at least less than one-half of that possible without the ionizing gas in the ambient gas composition. [0119] 21. The method in 1. (above) wherein the electric arc is traversed over select areas where coating material is desired to remain for the product being made and subsequently the more sintered powder layer is removed when the substrate is subject to a cleaning or unsintered powder removal method. [0120] 22. The method in 1. (above) wherein the method is repeated at least twice over the substrate where the resulting coating is thicker or has layers of different composition. [0121] 23. The device of 2. (above) additionally comprising the gas source being a flammable gas fuel. [0122] 24. The device of 2. (above) additionally comprising a fuel delivery means such as a control valve, mass-flow controller or rotometer, capable of delivering at least one gaseous fuel to a torch [0123] 25. The device of 2. (above) additionally comprising a torch capable of producing a flame of sufficient temperature to produce chemically and thermally generated ions as constituents of a flame plasma. [0124] 26. The device of 2. (above) additionally comprising an electrical circuit configured to apply at least part of the range of 100 V to 5000 V of electrical potential and control a desired flow of current of 1 mA to 300 mA through said gas. [0125] 27. The device in 2. (above) wherein said traversing means is a robotic arm with multiple degrees of motion freedom so that the torch can be maintained near the same angle and distance to the substrate even when the substrate is a complex shape. [0126] 28. The device in 2. (above) further comprising a substrate heating system that brings the coating and substrate up to a desired initial temperature for processing. [0127] 29. The coating in 3. (above) wherein the microstructure changes occur over distances of less than 1 micron.
[0128] Unless indicated otherwise, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term about. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
[0129] While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
[0130] All documents, books, manuals, papers, patents, published patent applications, guides, abstracts, and other references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.