Method for Operating Cell Based Mobility Production System
20230067801 · 2023-03-02
Inventors
- Seung Hyeon Kim (Goyang-si, KR)
- Ye Eun Kim (Anyang-si, KR)
- Suk Jae Youn (Yongin-si, KR)
- Hyun Dong Park (Seongnam-si, KR)
Cpc classification
G05B2219/32331
PHYSICS
G05B19/41865
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
An embodiment method of operating a cell-based mobility production system for producing various types of mobilities includes assigning works required in each cell of a plurality of cells connected in series or in parallel that vehicle bodies need to go through based on the type of the mobility to be produced, determining a feeding order of the vehicle bodies based on the assigned works, and reassigning the works required in each cell that the vehicle bodies to be fed need to go through based on the determined feeding order, wherein each of assigning the works, determining the feeding order, and reassigning the works is performed by a processor.
Claims
1. A method of operating a cell-based mobility production system for producing various types of mobilities, the method comprising: assigning works required in each cell of a plurality of cells connected in series or in parallel that vehicle bodies need to go through based on the type of the mobility to be produced; determining a feeding order of the vehicle bodies based on the assigned works; and reassigning the works required in each cell that the vehicle bodies to be fed need to go through based on the determined feeding order; and wherein each of assigning the works, determining the feeding order, and reassigning the works is performed by a processor.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising assembling the various types of mobilities by performing the reassigned work on the vehicle bodies fed into each cell.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein reassigning the works required in each cell comprises reassigning the works such that a total production time of the vehicle bodies to be fed according to the determined feeding order satisfies a minimum production time.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: after reassigning the works, detecting a work delay in a specific cell when the vehicle bodies are fed based on the determined feeding order; and reassigning the works again in response to detecting the work delay.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein reassigning the works comprises: preparing a plurality of expected reassignments in which the works required in each cell for the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the determined feeding order are assigned; and selecting an optimal reassignment from among the plurality of expected reassignments, wherein a total production time of the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the determined feeding order satisfies a minimum production time in the optimal reassignment.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the feeding order of the vehicle bodies comprises: preparing a plurality of expected production plans different from each other in the feeding order of the vehicle bodies; and selecting an optimal expected production plan from among the plurality of expected production plans that has a shortest total working time.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the feeding order of the vehicle bodies comprises: preparing a plurality of expected production plans different from each other in the feeding order of the vehicle bodies; and selecting an optimal expected production plan from among the plurality of expected production plans that has a shortest standby time.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein reassigning the works comprises reassigning the works required in each cell for the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the determined feeding order and workload differences between a preceding vehicle body and a following vehicle body of the vehicle bodies.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein reassigning the works comprises reassigning the works required in each cell for the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the determined feeding order and possible and impossible works in the respective cells.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising planning a logistics flow required in each cell based on the feeding order and the reassigned works.
11. A method of operating a cell-based mobility production system for producing various types of mobilities, the method comprising: assigning works required in each cell of a plurality of cells connected in series or in parallel that vehicle bodies need to go through based on the type of the mobility to be produced; determining a feeding order of the vehicle bodies based on the assigned works; reassigning the works required in each cell that the vehicle bodies to be fed need to go through based on the determined feeding order; and assembling the various types of mobilities by performing the reassigned work on the vehicle bodies fed into each cell.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising planning a logistics flow required in each cell based on the feeding order and the reassigned works.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: after planning the logistics flow, detecting an occurrence or non-occurrence of a logistics flow issue during feeding of the vehicle bodies based on the feeding order; and performing planning the logistics flow again in response to detecting the occurrence of the logistics flow issue.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the logistics flow issue comprises a collision or congestion in the logistics flow.
15. The method of claim 12, further comprising: after planning the logistics flow, detecting a work delay in a specific cell when the vehicle bodies are fed based on the feeding order; and in response to detecting the work delay, performing reassigning the works and planning the logistics flow again.
16. The method of claim 12, further comprising, after planning the logistics flow, detecting possibility or impossibility of achieving a target production amount of each mobility when the vehicle bodies are fed based on the feeding order.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein detecting the possibility or impossibility comprises detecting the impossibility of achieving the target production amount, the method further comprising reassigning the works and planning the logistics flow again in response to detecting the impossibility of achieving the target production amount.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein detecting the possibility or impossibility comprises detecting the possibility of achieving the target production amount, the method further comprising fixing and applying a smart factory operation plan in response to detecting the possibility of achieving the target production amount.
19. A cell-based mobility production system for producing various types of mobilities, the system comprising: a plurality of cells connected in series or in parallel, wherein the cells are configured to receive vehicle bodies and modify the vehicle bodies based on the type of the mobility to be produced; and a processor configured to: assign works required in each cell of the plurality of cells based on the type of the mobility to be produced; determine a feeding order of the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the assigned works; and reassign the works required in each cell based on the determined feeding order.
20. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is configured to reassign the works such that a total production time of the vehicle bodies to be fed based on the determined feeding order satisfies a minimum production time.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
[0030] Specific structural or functional descriptions of the embodiments of the present invention disclosed in the present specification or application are presented by way of examples only for the purpose of describing the embodiments according to the present invention, and the embodiments according to the present invention may be implemented in various forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments described in the present specification or application. In the following, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0031] Here, a sequence SEQ refers to an order in which vehicles are fed and will be denoted by Seq hereinafter. The embodiment method of operating the present invention may be performed by a controller (processor) but is not limited thereto.
[0032]
[0033]
[0034] An example of the works performed in each cell shown in
TABLE-US-00001 classification TE1 TE2 TE3 TE4 representative work door removal wiring plug/pad sunroof RR glass roof rack underpad IEB break T / GATE CAB headlining C/PAD blower rear bumper TE5 PM CM AM carpet / fixed glass / battery break tube engine room work underbody chassis decking/fastening WCCU wiring cable wheel guard T/F Convertible Cell FE1 FE ¼ ⅖ 3/6 FRT SIDE engine room interior trim CRT SIDE wiring W/STRIP striker RR SIDE T/GATE luggage seal side FEM RR seat console auxiliary battery FRT sear FRT bumper back panel molding luggage tray FE3 FE4 FE5 FE6 door installation styling wheel WS glass tire mounting fluid injection key coding FRUNK electrical equipment coding / inspection
[0035] As shown in TABLE 1, TE1 to TE5 may be connected in series and may form a trim line. And, PM to AM may be connected in series as a chassis line.
[0036] On the other hand, as shown in TABLE 1 and
[0037] And, FE1 to FE6 represent a final line, and final installation works may be performed in cells connected in series. As described above, the cell-based mobility production system to which embodiments of the present invention are applied has a basic assembly sequence and a cell arrangement.
[0038]
[0039] The manual cell shown in
[0040]
[0041]
[0042] As shown in the upper part of
[0043] However, as shown in the upper part of
[0044] Specifically, as shown in the upper and lower parts of
[0045] And, as shown in the upper part of
[0046] By the way, the total working time of the processes performed in Cells 1, 2, and 3 of model B of Seq 2 is different from the total working time of the processes performed in Cells 1, 2, and 3 of model A of Seq 1 due to the difference in working process performed in each cell for the respective models (the working time for model B is assumed to be shorter than that for model A in the present embodiment).
[0047] Accordingly, if the method of operating the production system based on a single work assignment optimized for model A is applied to the mixed production system and model A of Seq 1 is processed in Cell 2 after work in Cell 1 is completed, model B of Seq 2 fed following model A may not be fed to Cell 2 and stand by immediately after work in Cell 1 is completed due to the shorter working time for model B than model A, and idle time is generated and accumulated.
[0048] That is, the difference in working times between different models is not duly considered. This phenomenon is repeated every time models change and a different model is fed. Accordingly, the production efficiency of the mobility production system may decline and the daily target production amount of mobilities may not be achieved. After all, the application of the convention production system to the mixed production system adversely affects the overall vehicle production plan.
[0049] On the other hand, as shown in the lower part of
[0050] For example, considering that the total working time and working time in Cell 1 are shorter for Seq 2 (model B), the working time of Seq1 (model A) in Cell 1 may be extended and the working time of the same in Cell 2 may be shortened. That is, the working time in each cell may be adjusted by reassigning the working process performed in each cell for the same total working time of Seq1 (model A). Accordingly, the idle time between the work completion time in Cell 1 and the work start time in Cell 2 of Seq2 (model B) is reduced.
[0051] Sequentially, work reassignment may be implemented such that the working time in Cell 2 of Seq 2 (model B) is extended and the working time in Cell 3 is shortened in consideration of Cell 1 of Seq 3 (model A) and Cell 3 of Seq 1 (model A), which have a relatively long total working time. Accordingly, the idle time between the work completion time in Cell 1 and the work start time in Cell 2 of the Seq 3 (model A) is reduced. Eventually, the total production time of mobilities is minimized when the production system of embodiments of the present invention is applied to mixed production.
[0052] In this way, the method of operating the cell-based mobility production system according to an embodiment of the present invention reassigns the works for the respective vehicles based on the vehicle feeding order to solve the basic problem of the work delay that may occur in a multi-model mixed production line. Through this, the method of operating the cell-based mobility production system according to an embodiment of the present invention prepares a flexible production plan having a high degree of freedom and promotes productivity improvement.
[0053] The lower part of
[0054] Specifically, the works may be reassigned such that the difference between the work completion time of Seq 1 (model A) in Cell 2 and the work start time of Seq 2 (model B) in Cell 2 is minimized. To this end, the works in each cell may be reassigned such that the working time of Seq 1 (model A) in Cell 2 is reduced and the working time of Seq 1 (model A) in Cells 1 and 3 is extended.
[0055] Similarly, the works may be reassigned such that the difference between the work completion time of Seq 2 (model B) in Cell 2 and the work start time of Seq 3 (model A) in Cell 2 is minimized. To this end, the works in each cell may be reassigned such that the working time of Seq 2 (model B) in Cell 2 is extended and the working time of Seq 2 (model B) in Cells 1 and 3 is reduced.
[0056] In this way, the works required in each cell for the respective vehicle bodies to be fed may be reassigned such that the total working time for vehicle bodies to be fed satisfies the minimum working time.
[0057] TABLE 2 below illustrates the works that may be reassigned to other cells among the works performed in the process of TE 1 and the other cells to which the reassignment is possible.
TABLE-US-00002 line process system work title movable process (automation items are fixed and automated processes are not considered) trim TE1 moving RR door removal (LH/RH) current position trim TE1 interior roof gusset fastening TE2/TE3/TE4 trim TE1 interior installation of two plugs (two cowl upper panels) C/PAD(TA1) move to TE4 trim TE1 interior installation of two plugs (two cowl upper panels) C/PAD(TA1) move to TE4 trim TE1 interior installation of four plugs (2/2 fender aprons) ALL trim TE1 interior installation of one plug (rear floor panel) move to TE3
[0058] On the other hand, some parts in the automated process also may be reassigned to the manual process. Also, a link may be arranged such that work information and logistics information are automatically revised when the assignment is changed through this process.
[0059]
[0060] As shown in TABLE 1, various types of works that may be performed in each cell may be defined. In particular, movements between cells connected in parallel entail differences in production time depending on various moving paths. In addition, the working time in a cell also differs depending on what cells the vehicle body has gone through to the present cell. Accordingly, the method of operating the cell-based mobility production system according to an embodiment of the present invention sets the optimal moving path depending on the work assignment for the respective vehicles to minimize the total production time of the vehicle bodies.
[0061]
[0062] In addition,
[0063] And, in the reassigning of the works (S104), the works required in each cell for the vehicle bodies to be fed may be reassigned in consideration of the determined feeding order and sequential relationships between the respective works. And, in the reassigning of the works (S104), the works required in each cell for the vehicle bodies to be fed may be reassigned in consideration of the determined feeding order and possible and impossible works in the respective cells. That is, the works may be reassigned towards finding critical variables that minimize the object functions in consideration of various sets of constraints (sequential relationships between the respective works and impossible works in the respective cells) in the mathematical optimization model.
[0064] In addition,
[0065] On the other hand,
[0066] Here, in the assigning of the works (S102), the works may be assigned in consideration of the target production amount of each mobility. In addition, in the determining of the feeding order (S102), the feeding order may be determined in consideration of the total production time of the vehicle bodies to be fed according to the feeding order.
[0067] On the other hand,
[0068]
[0069]
[0070] TABLES 3 and 4 below show an example of production information, including the daily target production quantity for each process and production model, and processes that can be performed and reassigned for the respective vehicle models. TABLE 5 below shows a simulation result listing reduction rates of the overall total production time and the lead time for the respective vehicle models on the basis of a mixed production according to the determined feeding order as compared with the conventional invention (As-Is) that mathematically optimizes the work assignment based on a single vehicle model production under the constraints of TABLES 3 and 4.
[0071] In this way, the cell-based mobility production system according to the embodiment of the present invention achieves a reduction in the total production time while eliminating errors in the work assignment and the logistics flow through a digital twin simulation.
TABLE-US-00003 process (cell): 19 cells in total vehicle model number of vehicles produced (96 in total) TE1 0 13 TE2 1 15 TE3 2 13 TE4 3 11 TE5 4 11 PM 5 11 CM1/2 6 11 AM 7 11 FD1 FD2 FD3 FD4 FD5 FD6 FE1 FE2 FE3 FE4 FE5
TABLE-US-00004 process (cell) model 0 model 1 model 2 model 3 model 4 model 5 model 6 model 7 movable process 1, if performed in the current cell; 0, otherwise TE1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 current position TE1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 current position TE1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 TE2/TE3/TE 4 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to TE4 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to TE4 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ALL TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to TE3 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to TE3 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ALL TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ALL TE1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to TE3 TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ALL TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 move to AM TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 current position TE1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TE3/TE4/TE5
TABLE-US-00005 comparison of total production time <unit: hr.> To-Be work assignment for respective vehicles As-Is single work assignment reduction rate of production time reduction rate of production time total production time (hr.) 20.81 26.13 -5.32 -20% average production time per vehicle body (hr.) 2.87 2.95 -0.08 -3%
TABLE-US-00006 comparison of lead time for respective models To-Be work assignment for respective vehicles As-Is single work assignment reduction rate of lead time model average lead time model lead time 0 181.9 0 182.1 -0.1% 1 160.2 1 167.9 -4.6% 2 169.9 2 178.2 -4.6% 3 179.9 3 179.8 0.1% 4 164.3 4 173.4 -5.3% 5 177.4 5 180.8 -1.9% 6 179.4 6 180.1 -0.4% 7 167.4 7 177 -5.4%
[0072] As described above, specific embodiments of the present invention are illustrated and described, but it will be self-evident to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be improved upon and modified in various ways within the scope not departing from the technical spirit of the present invention provided by the patent claims below.