Fastening structures with high coefficient of thermal expansion for reduction of thermally driven stresses in securing aluminum silicon alloys
12331698 ยท 2025-06-17
Assignee
Inventors
- Daniel P. Hoffman (Fond du Lac, WI, US)
- Kevin R. Anderson (Fond du Lac, WI, US)
- Christopher J. Misorski (Fond du Lac, WI, US)
- Jeremy J. Dion (Port Washington, WI, US)
Cpc classification
F02F7/0021
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02F2007/0041
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C21D1/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
F02F7/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C21D1/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A fastening structure for securing two disparate sections of an aluminum silicon alloy product. A precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolt engages each hole of a first and second aluminum silicon alloy product sections to fasten the sections together. The fastening structure is optimally utilized in a high temperature environment having thermal fluctuations. In such environments, the precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolt has less than 15% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations, and in some embodiments, less than 13% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations. The invention is of particular use for the fastening of an engine block crankcase utilized in a high temperature environment having thermal fluctuations where an engine block, a crankcase bedplate and a crankcase cover are formed from AA 362.0 alloy.
Claims
1. An engine block crankcase utilized in a high temperature environment having thermal fluctuations comprising: an engine block having a plurality of holes; a crankcase bedplate formed from an aluminum silicon alloy and having a first plurality of holes corresponding to the plurality of holes in the engine block and a second plurality of holes; a crankcase cover formed from an aluminum silicon alloy and having a plurality of holes corresponding to the second plurality of holes in the crankcase bedplate, the engine block, crankcase bedplate and crankcase cover defining the crankcase; a crankshaft disposed in the crankcase; and a first and second plurality of threaded bolts constructed of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel and having a drive nut portion and stem member portion, wherein the first and second plurality of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts have less than 15% thermal relaxation during thermal fluctuations; wherein each hole of each of the first and second plurality of holes is a threaded hole having threads, and the first plurality of threaded precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts engage the threads of each hole of the first plurality of holes the along the stem member portion to secure the crankcase bedplate to the engine block such that the drive nut portion engages the crankcase bed plate, and the second plurality of threaded precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts engage the threads of the each hole of the second plurality of holes along the stem member portion to secure the crankcase cover to the crankcase bedplate such that the drive nut portion engages the crankcase cover, and such that the first and second plurality of threaded precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts retain the crankshaft therein.
2. The engine block crankcase of claim 1, wherein the first and second plurality of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts are formed from A286 alloy.
3. The engine block crankcase of claim 1, wherein the engine block, crankcase bedplate and the crankcase cover are formed from a strontium containing aluminum silicon alloy.
4. The engine block crankcase of claim 1, wherein the engine block, crankcase bedplate and the crankcase cover are formed from a nickel and strontium containing aluminum silicon alloy.
5. The engine block crankcase of claim 1, wherein the engine block, crankcase bedplate and the crankcase cover are formed from AA 362.0 alloy.
6. The engine block crankcase of claim 1, wherein the first and second plurality of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts have less than 13% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations.
7. An engine block crankcase utilized in a high temperature environment having thermal fluctuations comprising: an engine block having a plurality of holes; a crankcase bedplate formed from AA 362.0 alloy and having a first plurality of holes corresponding to the plurality of holes in the engine block and a second plurality of holes; a crankcase cover formed from AA 362.0 alloy and having a plurality of holes corresponding to the second plurality of holes in the crankcase bedplate, the engine block, crankcase bedplate and crankcase cover defining the crankcase; a crankshaft disposed in the crankcase; and a first and second plurality of threaded bolts constructed of A286 alloy and having a drive nut portion and stem member portion; wherein each hole of each of the holes of the first and second plurality of holes is a threaded hole having threads, and the first plurality of bolts engage the threads of each hole of the first plurality of holes the along the stem member portion to secure the crankcase bedplate to the engine block such that the drive nut portion engages the crankcase bed plate, and the second plurality of bolts engage the threads of the each hole of the second plurality of holes along the stem member portion to secure the crankcase cover to the crankcase bedplate such that the drive nut portion engages the crankcase cover, and such that the first and second plurality of threaded precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolt retain the crankshaft therein and wherein during operation the threaded bolts have less than 15% thermal relaxation during thermal fluctuations.
8. The engine block crankcase of claim 7, wherein the first and second plurality of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts have less than 13% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Examples of apparatuses for outboard marine engines are described with reference to the following drawing figures. The same numbers are used throughout the drawing figures to reference like features and components.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(9) In the present description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed. The different apparatuses described herein may be used alone or in combination with other apparatuses. Various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims. Each limitation in the appended claims is intended to invoke interpretation under 35 U.S.C. 112 (f), only if the terms means for or step for are explicitly recited in the respective limitation.
(10) Most generally, the present application relates to a fastening structure for securing two or more disparate sections, [e.g. 12, 24, 26 (
(11)
(12) The cover 24 is connected to the bedplate 26 by bolts 60 that extend through bolt holes 62 in the cover 24 and thread into the bedplate 26. The bedplate 26 is connected to the engine block 12 by bolts 64 that extend through bolt holes 66 in the bedplate 26. To maintain clarity on the drawings, not all the bolts 60, 64 and bolt holes 62, 66 are numbered.
(13) As is known in the art, a cooling water jacket is utilized to surround and cool the engine cylinders 14, 16 and crankshaft 18. By way of example, and without limitation,
(14) As shown in
(15) The coefficient of thermal expansion of aluminum alloys used for an exemplary engine block 12 depends primarily on the Silicon (Si) content of the aluminum alloy. As the percentage of Si increases, the coefficient of thermal expansion decreases. This is represented by dotted line 70 the graph of
(16) Prior to the present invention, carbon steel bolts with a coefficient of thermal expansion of 12.9610-6/K were threaded into bolt holes 27, 15 formed in thin (22 mm) bulkheads made from the A362.0 alloy. The difference in thermal expansion of 9.410-6/K, is believed to contribute significantly to the cracking of engine blocks 12 during engine durability testing. This difference is demonstrated by arrow 72 in the graph of
(17) The failure of the engine block 12 at the threaded holes 15 in bulkheads in aluminum alloy engines has been analyzed and from many different angles. Traditionally, prior aluminum alloy covers 24, bedplates 26, and bulkheads were thicker and had room for larger diameter carbon steel bolts that engage threaded bulkhead holes 15 resulting in lower stresses in the threads and the ability to spread engine operating and thermal loads over more material. While failure is lower, the engine weighs more, and this defeats the purpose of utilizing the lighter aluminum alloy material in the first place. Moreover, when the preferable thinner aluminum covers 24, bedplates 26, and bulkheads are utilized, the larger diameter carbon steel bolts that engage the threaded holes 15 in the thin bulkheads are not optimal for the engine geometry. Essentially, there is too little supporting aluminum around the large threaded bulkhead holes 15.
(18) Another approach has been to remove material from the center of the end of a carbon steel bolt 60, 64. This removal can reduce the stiffness or section modulus of the bolt and make it less stiff when interacting with the aluminum alloy. Thus, while this solution has some potential for limited effectiveness, it is not an optimal solution as it did not increase the life of silicon containing aluminum alloy engines.
(19) Some racing engines change the orientation of bolts as they extend through bolt holes 66 in the bedplate 26 at an angle into the block 12, resulting in splayed bolts. If the ends of the bolts can be in a cooler region of the engine, and the orientation of the engine operating loads can be known quite well, this approach can also be effective. Machining bolt holes 15 into blocks on angles, however, can be more difficult than machining perpendicular to flat surfaces, as shown in
(20) During research and experimentation, the inventors realized that the difference of coefficient of thermal expansion between an aluminum engine block 12 alloy and steel bolts 60, 64 is fundamental to the issue of failure of the engine blocks 12. For some time, the focus on the industry has been to modify the aluminum base (i.e. the alloy of the engine block 12) to change to a lower coefficient of thermal expansion aluminum alloy to minimize the difference with the traditional carbon steel bolt 60, 64. One of the inventors named herein has designed aluminum alloys that have particular utility in addressing this situation as shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,109,271 and 9,650,699, incorporated herein by reference. As discussed therein, these alloys have quite low coefficients of thermal expansion and excellent high temperature strength. Additionally, aluminum alloys with lower coefficients of thermal expansion such as the hypereutectic AlSi 390.1 and 391.1 alloys are used today to manufacture engines. These silicon containing aluminum alloys, however, are more expensive and require significantly more processing to form the alloys into aluminum engine blocks 12.
(21) Recognizing that the coefficient of thermal expansion problem would not be readily solved by modifying the base aluminum alloy, the inventors turned to potential modifications of the carbon steel bolts 60, 64. Specifically, the inventors investigated reducing the difference in thermal expansion between the bolt and any aluminum block material to equal to or less than 5.710-6/K by using a bolt with a higher coefficient of thermal expansion compared to carbon steel. The coefficients of thermal expansion are measured at the maximum engine operating oil temperature of the engine so that the bolt and mating aluminum tend to expand and contract to a more similar degree during engine operation. The inventors evaluated numerous materials in an effort to find a material with adequate mechanical properties and the proper level of the coefficient of thermal expansion. The inventors considered titanium alloys, carbon steel alloy variants, stainless steels, nickel based superalloys, cobalt based alloys, aluminum silicon alloys and copper base alloys.
(22) In exploring stronger versions of these materials, a highly unforeseen consequence arose. For certain materials, and particularly austenitic stainless steel alloys, they must be cold worked in order for the strength of the final product to be increased. While it was possible to strengthen most of these alloys to meet the mechanical property requirements at the desired design size of the fasteners so that the engine does not get any larger, the cold working process altered the coefficient of thermal expansion of these materials. In the cold worked condition where the strength is at the required level, the coefficient of thermal expansion decreased to the point that is was only as good as the carbon steel bolt that these were designed to replace. Therefore, there was no advantage of using these materials as fasteners to address this issue.
(23) One relatively rare alloy family, the precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel alloys that can meet these diverse requirements. Within the family of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel alloys, one alloy that has shown particular utility for main bolts in AA 362.0 aluminum alloy engines is A286 stainless steel. While stainless steel that is generally considered too weak for engine securement applications, it is used in unique corrosion resistant applications or direct flame impingement situations. Here, stainless steel, and particularly precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel alloys such as A286 were not apparent because the application is a highly non-corrosive environmentthe bolts 60, 64 in securing the covers 24 and bedplate 26 are held in an engine oil-rich environment. Moreover, A286 is an expensive alloy to manufacture bolts from, and the bolts in general are typically constructed from a material that has very little thermal expansion. Thus, it was counter-intuitive for the inventors to look to stainless steels, much less particularly precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel alloys such as A286 as a fastening option, and bolts constructed of A286 were not readily available in part because of the non-optimal thermal expansion characteristics.
(24) Nonetheless, when A286 bolts with a thermal expansion of 16.6710-6/K were tested and used, the failure rate of the engine blocks 12 made of AA 362.0 aluminum alloy in durability testing unexpectedly plunged to 0%. The difference in coefficient of thermal expansion of 5.710-6/K between the AA 362.0 engine block 12 and the A286 bolts 60, 64 is demonstrated by arrow 74 in
(25) As shown in the EXAMPLES below, the clamp load retention of an A286 bolt was dramatically better than traditional carbon steel bolts. In other words, the A286 bolts loosen far less in service compared to traditional carbon steel bolts. The inventors contemplate that this is due to the small delta in thermal expansion between the AA 362.0 engine block material and the A286 bolts. This solution provides a novel, production-relevant, material-based solution for preventing cracking of lightweight aluminum silicon alloy engine blocks, and may be more generally applied to the fastening of aluminum silicon alloys in high temperature environments.
(26) Accordingly, and referring again to
(27) The first plurality 60 and second plurality 64 of precipitation hardenable austenitic stainless steel bolts have less than 15% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations. The bolts 60, 64 may have less than 14% or 13% thermal relaxation after thermal fluctuations. The engine block 12, crankcase bedplate 26 and the crankcase cover 24 may be formed from a strontium containing aluminum silicon alloy of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,923,935, 7,347,905, and 7,666,353. Alternatively the engine block 12, crankcase bedplate 26 and the crankcase cover 24 may be formed from a nickel and strontium containing aluminum silicon alloy of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,109,271 and 9,650,699. In one embodiment, the engine block 12, crankcase bedplate 26 and the crankcase cover 24 are formed from AA 362.0 alloy.
Example 1
(28) A component level fatigue test was also conducted to show the enhanced clamp load retention of the invention. Aluminum alloy samples of AA 362.0 alloy were extruded to eliminate as-cast porosity and other discontinuities from the casting process that could increase material property variation. Samples were machined to 17.4 mm diameter to approximate the width of a thin engine bulkhead. The samples were form thread tapped, and thermally conditioned to reduce residual stress in the aluminum alloy. Carbon steel bolts and A286 stainless steel bolts were threaded into the aluminum samples and the assemblies were fatigue tested at 160 C., the maximum design oil temperature for engines of the type described above.
Example 2
(29) Finite element analysis of both traditional carbon steel bolts and A286 bolts into AA 362.0 alloy engine blocks was also conducted to demonstrate clamp load retention. As shown in
Example 3
(30) A clamp load comparison analysis was conducted between traditional carbon steel bolts on AA 362.0 alloy engine blocks versus A286 bolts on AA 362.0 alloy engine blocks. The carbon steel bolts were thermally cycled three times from 40 C. to 145 C. with a 3 hour hold time at each extreme. The A286 bolts were subject to a more severe treatment where the bolts were thermally cycled four times from 40 C. to 145 C. with a 3 hour hold time at each extreme. As demonstrated in TABLES 1-4, below, the A286 bolts had only 12.6% and 10.4% average thermal relaxation, as compared to 19.2% and 15.5% average thermal relaxation for carbon steel bolts. It is important to note that this is in good agreement with research at Chrysler Corporation where clamp load relaxation of 15%-30% was reported for carbon steel fasteners in aluminum silicon alloy engine blocks (SAE Paper 2010-01-0965).
(31) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Carbon Steel Fasteners Assembly Specification: 40 Nm + 75* Fastener 2.sup.nd Installation Post Thermal Clamp Thermal ID Clamp Load (kN) Load (kN) Relaxation 1 43.1 34.5 20.0% 2 43.3 36.2 16.5% 3 47.3 37.2 21.5% 4 47.8 38.7 19.0% 5 47.3 37.5 20.7% 6 47.8 37.9 20.7% 7 47.9 39.4 17.8% 8 48.2 39.6 17.8% Average 46.6 37.6 19.2%
(32) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Carbon Steel Fasteners Assembly Specification: 25 Nm + 60* Fastener 2.sup.nd Installation Post Thermal Clamp Thermal ID Clamp Load (kN) Load (kN) Relaxation 1 33.9 29.2 13.7% 2 33.3 28.4 14.8% 3 35.2 29.6 15.9% 4 34.6 29.0 16.2% 5 34.5 29.2 15.4% 6 34.7 28.7 17.5% 7 36.2 30.9 14.7% 8 34.2 28.8 15.6% Average 34.6 29.2 15.5%
(33) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 A286 Stainless Fasteners Assembly Specification: 35 Nm + 60* Fastener 2.sup.nd Installation Post Thermal Clamp Thermal ID Clamp Load (kN) Load (kN) Relaxation 1 47.4 41.6 12.4% 2 49.6 43.5 12.3% 3 47.4 41.6 12.4% 4 48.1 41.9 12.9% 5 46.2 40.6 12.2% 6 46.9 40.9 12.8% 7 48.7 42.4 12.9% 8 49.2 42.9 12.8% Average 47.9 41.9 12.6%
(34) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 A286 Stainless Fasteners Assembly Specification: 25 Nm + 45* Fastener 2.sup.nd Installation Post Thermal Clamp Thermal ID Clamp Load (kN) Load (kN) Relaxation 1 35.9 33.2 7.3% 2 36.4 32.8 10.0% 3 37.4 33.6 10.3% 4 36.9 32.7 11.4% 5 35.9 32.4 9.7% 6 38.8 34.3 11.6% 7 36.6 32.5 11.3% 8 37.8 33.5 11.4% Average 37.0 33.1 10.4%