TAGGANT INSPECTION SYSTEM
20250241358 ยท 2025-07-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
A24C5/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A system is provided for checking a presence and integrity of taggant applied to components of aerosol-generating articles during manufacture of the aerosol-generating articles on a manufacturing line, the system including: a first sensor configured to detect a taggant applied to a surface of a material web and to determine that the taggant has been applied to meet a predetermined continuity of application quality condition; and a second sensor located downstream of the first sensor on the manufacturing line, the second sensor configured to inspect portions of the material web after the material web has been cut into portions and to confirm at least one of a predetermined profile of the taggant and a predetermined concentration of the taggant. A method of checking a presence and integrity of taggant applied to components of aerosol-generating articles during manufacture of the articles on a manufacturing line is also provided.
Claims
1.-15. (canceled)
16. A system for checking a presence and integrity of taggant applied to components of aerosol-generating articles during manufacture of the aerosol-generating articles on a manufacturing line, the system comprising: at least one first sensor configured to detect a taggant applied to a surface of a material web and to determine that the taggant has been applied to meet a predetermined continuity of application quality condition; and at least one second sensor located downstream of the at least one first sensor on the manufacturing line, the at least one second sensor configured to inspect portions of the material web after the material web has been cut into portions and to confirm at least one of a predetermined profile of the taggant and a predetermined concentration of the taggant.
17. The system according to claim 16, wherein the material web is tipping paper.
18. The system according to claim 16, wherein the taggant is applied to the material web in a form of at least one substantially continuous band along a length of the material web.
19. The system according to claim 18, wherein the at least one first sensor is configured to indicate a fault condition if the at least one first sensor detects an interruption in the at least one substantially continuous band.
20. The system according to claim 18, wherein the at least one first sensor is configured to indicate a fault condition if the at least one first sensor detects a variation outside a predetermined range in an amount of taggant per unit length applied along the at least one substantially continuous band or in an amount of taggant per unit length applied along at least one of the at least two substantially continuous bands.
21. The system according to claim 16, wherein the cut portions of the material web are configured as circumferential wrappers in rod-shaped articles, and wherein the taggant is present on exterior surfaces of the circumferential wrappers.
22. The system according to claim 21, wherein the at least one second sensor is configured to inspect each circumferential wrapper at only one rotational orientation of a rod-shaped article with respect to a longitudinal axis of the rod-shaped article.
23. The system according to claim 16, wherein the at least one first sensor or the at least one second sensor or the at least one first sensor and the at least one second sensor are configured to operate using electromagnetic waves having a wavelength or having wavelengths in at least one of an ultraviolet spectrum, a visible light spectrum, and an infra-red spectrum.
24. The system according to claim 23, wherein the at least one first sensor and the at least one second sensor are configured to operate using electromagnetic radiation of different wavelengths.
25. The system according to claim 16, wherein the taggant is a phosphorescent taggant having a predetermined emission half-life, and wherein the at least one first sensor is configured to detect a phosphorescent response from the taggant but not to verify or determine the emission half-life of the phosphorescent taggant.
26. The system according to claim 25, wherein the at least one second sensor is configured to verify or determine the emission half-life of the phosphorescent taggant.
27. A method of checking a presence and integrity of taggant applied to components of aerosol-generating articles during manufacture of the aerosol-generating articles on a manufacturing line, the method comprising: providing at least one first sensor; operating the at least one first sensor to detect a taggant applied to a surface of a material web and to determine that the taggant has been applied to meet a predetermined continuity of application quality condition; providing at least one second sensor located downstream of the at least one first sensor on the manufacturing line; and operating the at least one second sensor to inspect portions of the material web after the material web has been cut into portions and to confirm at least one of a predetermined profile of the taggant and a predetermined concentration of the taggant.
28. The method according to claim 27, wherein the at least one first sensor indicates a fault condition if the at least one first sensor detects a variation outside a predetermined range in an amount of taggant per unit length applied along at least one substantially continuous band.
29. The method according to claim 27, wherein the taggant is a phosphorescent taggant having a predetermined emission half-life, and wherein the at least one first sensor detects a phosphorescent response from the taggant but does not verify or determine the emission half-life of the phosphorescent taggant.
30. The method according to claim 29, wherein the at least one second sensor verifies or determines the emission half-life of the phosphorescent taggant.
Description
[0155] Examples will now be further described with reference to the figures in which:
[0156]
[0157]
[0158]
[0159]
[0160]
[0161]
[0162]
[0163]
[0164] Component A may be a filter rod, component B may be a hollow acetate tube, and component C may be a tobacco rod, although this is just a non-limiting example.
[0165] After cutting, the individual wrapped rods 1 are passed on to the combiner section 300, shown in more detail in
[0166] The combiner section 300 is configured to take individual wrapped rods 1 that have been cut from the continuous rod CR and to arrange the individual wrapped rods 1 pair-wise, each pair of individual wrapped rods 1 being disposed along a straight line generally transverse to the direction of travel T2. Each pair of individual wrapped rods 1 is linearly arranged so that a segment A of one individual wrapped rod 1 is closest to a segment A of its corresponding individual wrapped rod 1 in the pair, with a space between respective segments A of the pair.
[0167] A further rod-shaped segment D is then placed in the space between the individual wrapped rods 1 of each pair, and a tipping paper (not shown in
[0168] The double rods are then cut in half through the tipping paper and the rod-shaped segment D so as to form individual aerosol-generating articles 310.
[0169]
[0170] The pairs of individual wrapped rods 1 are passed along direction T2 by way of a sequence of rotating conveyor drums 331, 332, 333 and 334. During passage along direction T2, the individual wrapped rods 1 are positioned precisely relative to each other so as to provide a gap between segment A ends of each pair of individual wrapped rods 1. Operational details of conveyor drums in combiner machines are known to those skilled in the art, and need not be described in detail in the present disclosure.
[0171] Rod-shaped segments D, for example mouthpieces, are placed in the spaces between segment A ends of respective pairs of individual wrapped rods 1 on conveyor drum 334 by way of conveyor drums 340, 341 and 342.
[0172] The pairs of individual wrapped rods 1 with their centrally-disposed rod-shaped segments D are then passed further along direction T2 by way of conveyor drums 335 and 336.
[0173] At conveyor drum 335, each pair of individual wrapped rods 1 with its centrally-disposed rod-shaped segment D is provided with a tipping paper that is wrapped around the rod-shaped segment D and the facing ends of each pair of individual wrapped rods 1 so as to form double length rods 9, which are then passed on to conveyor drum 336 and then on to conveyor drum 6. The double length rods 9 are subsequently cut in half through the tipping paper and the rod-shaped segment D so as to form individual aerosol-generating articles 310.
[0174] Instead of forming double length rods 9 from end-to-end arranged individual wrapped rods 1 and centrally-disposed rod-shaped segments D, it is also possible for a combiner 300 to be configured to transport individual wrapped rods 1 as a single, rather than a double, stream along direction T2. In this alternative, rod-shaped segments D are individually attached to segment A ends of each individual wrapped rod 1 by way of tipping paper, and no subsequent cutting step is required. However, combiners 300 that process double length rods 9 generally have a greater throughput than combiners that only process single rods.
[0175] The general operation of the rod-making section 200 and the combiner section 300 is known to those skilled in the art, and will not be described in further detail in the present disclosure.
[0176] Referring to
[0177]
[0178] The first sensors 10, 11 are preferably not configured to detect a predetermined profile of the taggant. Alternatively or in addition, the first sensors 10, 11 are preferably not configured to detect a predetermined concentration of the taggant. Detecting a predetermined profile of a taggant is generally a slower process than detecting a taggant continuity of application quality condition, since detecting the predetermined profile usually requires analysing a rate of decay of intensity of electromagnetic radiation 360, 361 emitted by the taggant and performing appropriate calculations. This analysis typically takes a time of the order of milliseconds. Similar considerations apply to detecting a predetermined concentration of the taggant. Accordingly, band of material web 2 can be run past the first sensors 10, 11 at a higher speed than would be possible if it was necessary for the first sensors 10, 11 to detect a predetermined profile or concentration of the taggant. This means that the speed of travel of the band of material web 2 past the first sensors 10, 11 is not unduly limited, thus improving speed of manufacture of the aerosol-generating articles.
[0179] If the first sensor or sensors 10, 11 detects an interruption or discontinuity in the band or bands of taggant 3, 33 applied to the band of material web 2, then a signal may be given to reject an aerosol-generating article 310 comprising a tipping paper 400 bearing the interrupted or discontinuous band or bands of taggant 3, 33. In extreme situations, such as the first sensor or sensors 10, 11 detecting that no taggant 3 is present at all on an extended length of material web 2, the manufacturing line 100 may be temporarily stopped so as to allow a replacement bobbin 4 of material web 2 to be installed.
[0180]
[0181] A second sensor 20 is mounted adjacent to the conveyor drum 6. The second sensor 20 comprises an emitter configured to emit a beam of electromagnetic radiation 430 towards the band 3 of taggant on the tipping paper 400, and a receiver configured to receive electromagnetic radiation 440 emitted by the band 3 of taggant on the tipping paper 400.
[0182] The conveyor drum 6 is configured to rotate about an axis 420. Preferably, the conveyor drum 6 is configured to rotate continuously. The speed of travel of the rod-shaped aerosol-generating articles 310 past the second sensor is less than the speed of travel of the band of material web 2 past the first sensor or sensors 10, 11. This means that there is sufficient time for the incident beam of electromagnetic radiation 430 to elicit a photoluminescent response from the taggant 3 on the tipping paper 400 and for the rate of decay of intensity of emitted electromagnetic radiation from the taggant 3 to be analysed. For example, the incident beam of electromagnetic radiation 430 may be directed at the taggant 3 on the tipping paper 400 for a first predetermined time, sufficient to excite electrons in the taggant 3 to a higher energy state, and the emitter in the second sensor may then be switched off. The electrons in the taggant 3 will then return to a lower energy state, emitting photons as the electromagnetic radiation 440 that is detected by the receiver in the second sensor 20. An emission half-life of the taggant 3 can be determined by measuring an intensity of the electromagnetic radiation 440 emitted by the taggant 3 and determining a time taken for the intensity to fall by 50% from a peak value at a time when the emitter in the second sensor 20 is switched off. The emission half-life of the taggant 3 can be correlated with a predetermined profile of the taggant 3. Alternatively or in addition, the emission half-life of the taggant can be correlated with a predetermined concentration of the taggant 3.
[0183] The conveyor drum 6 continues to rotate so that the next aerosol-generating article 310 passes under the second sensor 20, and the emitter of the second sensor 20 is switched on again to repeat the process described above.
[0184] Importantly, because the first sensor or sensors 10, 11 have already checked the predetermined continuity of application quality condition, there is no need to the aerosol-generating articles 310 to be rotated within the grooves 410 of the conveyor drum 6 when being inspected by the second sensor 20. It will already have been established by the first sensor or sensors 10, 11 that the band of taggant 3 has been applied evenly all the way around the tipping paper 400 on the aerosol-generating article 310. Accordingly, the second sensor 20 need only inspect the taggant 3 on the aerosol-generating articles 310 at a single rotational orientation of the aerosol-generating article 310 with respect to a longitudinal axis of the aerosol-generating article 310. This improves the speed of manufacture of the aerosol-generating articles, since the conveyor drum 6 can rotate more quickly than would be the case if it were necessary to inspect the taggant 3 on the tipping paper 400 in multiple rotational orientations of the aerosol-generating article.
[0185] If the second sensor 20 determines that the taggant 3 does not elicit the correct response to the incident beam of electromagnetic radiation 430, for example because the concentration of taggant 3 is too low, or because the taggant 3 is contaminated, then a signal may be given to reject the aerosol-generating article 310 (or double length rod 9) comprising the tipping paper 400 with the defective taggant 3.
[0186] Although the illustrated embodiment shows individual aerosol-generating articles 310, it will be understood that double length rods 9 could be conveyed by the drum, and two second sensors 20 could be provided so as to inspect the taggant on each half of the respective double length rods 9.
[0187] The taggant 3 may be applied to the band of material web 2 on the manufacturing line 100, for example by way of a spray nozzle. Alternatively, the band of material web 2 may have the taggant 3 applied before feeding into the manufacturing line 100. The band of material web 2 may have taggant 3 applied during manufacture, or prior to being wound onto the bobbin 4.
[0188] Preferably, the taggant 3 is applied to a surface of the band of material web 2 that will form an exterior surface of a tipping paper 400 on an aerosol-generating article 310. This means that electromagnetic radiation does not have to penetrate the tipping paper 400 before eliciting a photoluminescent response. This is also of benefit when the aerosol-generating article 310 is inserted into an aerosol-generating device (not shown) where electromagnetic radiation is used to identify a predetermined profile of the taggant 3 so as to identify a type or provenance of the aerosol-generating article 310.
[0189] However, there may be implementations where the taggant 3 is applied to a surface of the band of material web 2 that will form an interior surface of a tipping paper 400 on an aerosol-generating article 310. Although it is necessary for electromagnetic radiation to penetrate the tipping paper 400 in these implementations, locating the taggant 3 on the interior surface of the tipping paper 400 may help to prevent the taggant 3 from being inadvertently removed from the tipping paper 400 by rough handling or exposure to moisture.
[0190] Advantageously, the first sensor or sensors 10, 11 are positioned at a point in the production line 100 immediately before the band of material web 2 is cut into portions. This ensures that the continuity of application quality condition is determined after the band of material web 2 has been dispensed from the bobbin 4 and passed over a number of tensioning rollers, since these handling steps might themselves damage the band of applied taggant 3 and introduce unwanted discontinuities. By performing the continuity of application quality condition check immediately before cutting the band of material web 2 into portions, a more reliable indication of continuity of application quality around the tipping paper 400 on a finished aerosol-generating article is obtained.
[0191]
[0192]
[0193]
[0194] For the purpose of the present description and of the appended claims, except where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing amounts, quantities, percentages, and so forth, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term about. Also, all ranges include the maximum and minimum points disclosed and include any intermediate ranges therein, which may or may not be specifically enumerated herein. In this context, therefore, a number A is understood as A5% of A. Within this context, a number A may be considered to include numerical values that are within general standard error for the measurement of the property that the number A modifies. The number A, in some instances as used in the appended claims, may deviate by the percentages enumerated above provided that the amount by which A deviates does not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the claimed invention. Also, all ranges include the maximum and minimum points disclosed and include any intermediate ranges therein, which may or may not be specifically enumerated herein.