METHOD OF ENHANCING ROOM-TEMPERATURE PLASTICITY IN BRITTLE CERAMICS AND CERAMICS PRODUCED THEREBY
20250243127 ยท 2025-07-31
Assignee
Inventors
- Xinghang Zhang (West Lafayette, IN, US)
- Zhongxia Shang (West Lafayette, IN, US)
- Haiyan Wang (West Lafayette, IN, US)
- Chao Shen (Mesa, AZ, US)
- Anyu Shang (West Lafayette, IN, US)
Cpc classification
C04B2235/604
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B28B11/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C04B41/0081
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3232
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C04B41/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A method for increasing the room temperature ductility of an object made of a ceramic material is disclosed. The method includes providing an object made of a ceramic material, heating the object made of the ceramic material to a temperature to or above the brittle to ductile transition temperature of the ceramic material, introducing defects into the microstructure of the object by deforming the object at the temperature, and cooling the object to room temperature, resulting in room-temperature ductility higher than the room-temperature ductility of the object prior to the heating and deforming steps. A ceramic material subjected to the above-described method of achieving room-temperature ductility is also disclosed. An object made of ceramic material subjected to the above-described method of achieving room-temperature ductility is also disclosed.
Claims
1. A method for increasing the room temperature ductility of an object made of a ceramic material, comprising: providing an object made of a ceramic material; heating the object made of the ceramic material to a temperature to or above the brittle to ductile transition temperature of the ceramic material; introducing defects into the microstructure of the object by deforming the object at the temperature. cooling the object to room temperature, resulting in room-temperature ductility higher than the room-temperature ductility of the object prior to the heating and deforming steps.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the ceramic material is titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2)
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the ceramic material is Aluminum oxide (Al.sub.2O.sub.3)
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature is 10-50 degrees C. higher than the transition temperature.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the deformation of the object is by compression.
6. The method of claims 1, 2, or 4, wherein the defects introduced are dislocations and/or stacking faults.
7. The method of claims 1, 3, or 4, wherein the defects introduced are dislocations and/or twins.
8. The method of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein the resulting deformation strain at room temperature is 3.3 times higher than the deformation strain at room temperature prior to heating the object.
9. (canceled)
10. A ceramic material subjected to the method of claim 1.
11. An object made of a ceramic material and subjected to the method of claim 1.
12. The object of claim 11, wherein the ceramic material is a structural material.
13. The object of claim 11, wherein the object is a structural component.
14. The ceramic material of claim 10, wherein the ceramic material is TiO.sub.2 or Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
15. The object of claim 11, wherein the ceramic material is TiO.sub.2 or Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0009] While some of the figures shown herein may have been generated from scaled drawings or from photographs that are scalable, it is understood that such relative scaling within a figure is by way of example, and are not to be construed as limiting. In these figures the symbol has been used.
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0015] For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates.
[0016] This detailed description is supported by several experiments, materials, methods, tests and test results leading to this disclosure. Ceramic materials with high strength and chemical inertness are widely used as engineering materials. However, the brittle nature limits their applications as fracture occurs before the onset of plastic yielding. There has been limited success despite extensive efforts to enhance the deformability of ceramics. Here we report a method for enhancing the room temperature plastic deformability of ceramics by artificially introducing abundant defects into the materials via preloading at elevated temperatures. After the preloading treatment, single crystal (SC) TiO.sub.2 exhibited a significant increase in deformability, achieving 10% strain at room temperature. SC -Al.sub.2O.sub.3 also showed plastic deformability, 6-7.5% strain, by using the preloading strategy. These preinjected defects enabled the plastic deformation process of the ceramics at room temperature. These findings suggest a great potential for defect engineering in achieving plasticity in ceramics at room temperature.
[0017] Interestingly, despite the limited RT deformability, under elevated temperatures, ceramics can become more deformable and even ductile due to the activation of slip systems and nucleation of numerous defects. The critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) required to initiate plastic deformation decreases at higher temperatures, allowing for the slip to occur more readily. For example, it has been reported that the CRSS of SC MgO.Math.Al.sub.2O.sub.3 decreases by 2 orders of magnitude for {110} slip when temperature increases from 200 to 1,900 C. Meanwhile, the CRSS of SC sapphire for both basal and prismatic slip drastically decreases at elevated temperature following a temperature-dependent logarithmic law.
[0018] This disclosure describes a generalized concept to improve RT plasticity in ceramics, i.e., using an elevated temperature preloading method to artificially introduce abundant defects into ceramics under elevated temperature and thus significantly improve their RT deformability. In this disclosure the symbol is used to represent strain.
[0019] The materials and methods and tests utilized in experiments leading to this disclosure will now be described: Micropillars of SC (001) TiO.sub.2 and SC (0001) Al.sub.2O.sub.3 with a dimension of 3 m in diameter and 6 m in height (a diameter-to-height aspect ratio of 1:2) were fabricated using a focused ion beam (FIB) in a Thermo Fischer Quanta 3D FEG scanning electron microscope. A series of decreasing currents were utilized to mill the pillar with the least tapering angles in a concentric and annular crater. In situ SEM micropillar compression experiments were performed inside the Quanta 3D FEG microscope using a Hysitron PI 88R PicoIndenter to collect the force-displacement data. For elevated temperature in situ compression setups, the 20 m diameter diamond flat punch was fixed on the probe heater, and the specimens were clamped on a ceramic heating stage tightly by V-shaped molybdenum. Before the compression test, the temperature on both the heating stage and probe heater was simultaneously ramped up at a rate of 10 C./min and isothermally stabilized for 30 min to eliminate the thermal-driven drifts. An average drift rate of less than 0.5 nm/s and an estimated force noise level of less than 8 N were monitored during the alignment preloading process for 45 s. When the temperature of both sample stage and indenter tip reached the preset values and remained stable for 30 min, preloading compression began by compressing the pillar using a diamond flat punch tip at a constant strain rate of 510.sup.3 s.sup.1. The selection of the strain rate was within the range of the typical quasistatic uniaxial compression test. Upon detecting the yielding phenomenon from the load-displacement curve (typically at a plastic strain of 2-3%), the preloading procedure was terminated. Afterwards, the samples were cooled down to RT for subsequent testing. An overestimation of specimen displacement during the compression test induced by a displacement associated with the measuring instrument (machine compliance) was systematically corrected.
[0020] In situ microcompression tests of SC (001) TiO.sub.2: SC (001) TiO.sub.2 micropillar specimens tested at three different deformation conditions are referred to as DT1 (deformation at RT), DT2 (deformation at 600 C.), and DT3 (preloading at 600 C. to just beyond yielding, cooled to RT, and followed by RT compression). All deformation experiments were performed at a constant strain rate of 510.sup.3 s.sup.1.
[0021] As shown in
[0022] Bright-field (BF) TEM micrographs showed that the DT1 TiO.sub.2 pillar contains strain contours and scattered dislocations when deformed to =3% (onset of catastrophic fracture). To investigate the influence of preloading on the RT deformability, post-mortem TEM analyses were also performed on the DT2 and DT3 pillars of SC TiO.sub.2.
[0023] Meanwhile, these dislocation-rich slip bands intersected and blocked the propagation of microcracks. When the DT3 pillars were compressed to an even greater strain, 11%, several phenomena were observed. First, in addition to the inclined microcracks, vertical microcracks appeared (Section E of
[0024] In situ microcompression tests of SC (0001) Al.sub.2O.sub.3: To explore the general applicability of the concept of preloading improved plasticity in ceramics, similar preloading experiments were performed in SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3. In this case, SC (0001) Al.sub.2O.sub.3 specimens were tested at three deformation conditions, referred to as DA1 (deformation at RT), DA2 (deformation at 740 C.), and DA3 (preloading at 740 C. to slightly beyond plastic yielding, cooled to RT, followed by RT compression) specimen, at a constant strain rate of 510.sup.3 s.sup.1. As shown in section A of
[0025] It was also determined that the SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 DA1 pillar deformed at RT to a maximum fracture strain of 3% without any preloading treatment. BF-TEM images showed short dislocation segments scattered in the upper half of the pillar, while some giant transgranular cracks propagated throughout the entire pillar. IPF map indicated that the crack penetration to the pillar interior leads to a minor texture change and little crystal rotation. The KAM map indicates scattered dislocations. The Geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) map showed that GNDs were mostly distributed near the pillar top and along the cracks.
[0026] Post-mortem microstructure analyses were performed on the SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 DA2 and DA3 micropillars to investigate the influence of preloading on the microstructure evolution. As shown in BF TEM micrographs in sections A-B of
[0027] The micropillar compression studies of this disclosure show that SC TiO.sub.2 experienced brittle failure when tested at RT. The poor deformability of the pristine pillar is a result of the aforementioned lack of capability for the nucleation and glide of dislocations. Surprisingly, substantial plasticity was observed in the preloaded pillar under RT compression, where the pillars were plastically deformed to 10% strain without catastrophic failure (section I of
[0028] Defect-assisted room-temperature (RT) plasticity in preloaded SC TiO.sub.2: Compared to pristine ceramics with few defects, abundant defects, such as dislocation seeds and twin boundaries, were introduced in the pillars during the preloading at elevated temperatures. These defects allow ceramics to bypass the large CRSS required for dislocation nucleation at RT, therefore when the preloaded pillars containing dislocations were deformed at RT, plastic deformation took place. It has been reported that under the uniaxial compression along direction between 3001,300 C., SC TiO.sub.2 deformed by {10
[0029] Work hardening is frequently observed in ductile metallic materials due to the formation of forest dislocations. In contrast, work hardening is rare in ceramics, especially at RT due to the aforementioned brittle nature of ceramics. Hence it is unexpected that the preloaded TiO.sub.2 pillars show prominent work hardening phenomenon as shown in section I of
[0030] Next, we examine the influence of dislocation slip bands on crack propagation in ceramics. Cracking is a prevalent deformation mechanism in ceramics when deformed at RT. Microcracks were also observed in TiO.sub.2 pillars deformed to a strain of 5.5%. Section E of
[0031] In addition to work hardening and blockage of microcracks, another deformation mechanism may have also been triggered to improve RT plasticity in TiO.sub.2. As shown in sections E and F of
[0032] Defect-assisted RT plasticity in preloaded SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3: Similarly, the preloading concept appears effective to improve the RT plasticity of SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3. Some parallel rhombohedral twin boundaries as well as dislocation seeds were embedded into SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 during elevated temperature preloading to 2% strain as shown in sections A_D of
[0033] It should be noted that the IPF map (section D of
[0034] Once the preloaded pillar was further compressed to 7% strain at RT, two sets of inclined SFs were observed to intersect with each other (sections E, F of
[0035] Comparing to the IPF map in preloaded SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (to a strain of 2% at 740 C.) in
[0036] Another dislocation enabled plasticity mechanism has been observed in SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3. After the preloaded SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is deformed at RT to a strain of 5%, significant dilation of the pillar top was observed, and slip traces from two intersecting twin planes were also revealed on the pillar surface (section I of
[0037] While the influence of preloading on nucleation of dislocations has been confirmed in this study on two model systems, TiO.sub.2 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3, the mobility of dislocation is also curtailed by lattice friction stress. The significant RT plasticity observed in preloaded TiO.sub.2 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 implies that the lattice friction stress in these ceramics may have been reduced. Several factors may play an important role. First, partial dislocations are prevalent in the deformed TiO.sub.2 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3. It is known that the friction stress for partials is lower than perfect dislocations because the dislocation core width is broader for partials. Second, our ASTR IPF studies show that TBs in preloaded Al.sub.2O.sub.3 have steps. Such defect TBs have been shown to be the source for mobile partials, and thus enable prominent plasticity in twinned metallic materials. Third, it has been shown that the dislocation core in Al.sub.2O.sub.3 can be non-stoichiometric. Edge dislocation can dissociate into two partials on adjacent glide plane and thus improve the mobility of dislocations at elevated temperatures. It is likely that such unique dislocation cores created during preloading at elevated temperature have been preserved at room temperature, and thus enable the dislocation mobility at RT. RT plasticity has been reported in flash-sintered polycrystalline TiO.sub.2 by Li et. al. Flash sintering, a non-equilibrium sintering technique, introduces abundant dislocations as well as oxygen vacancies during the sintering process. These defects can accommodate mechanical deformation and improve plasticity at RT. In flash-sintered ceramics, it is likely that oxygen vacancies and other charged point defects have reduced the friction stress for migration of dislocations. Similarly, It was reported that the ductility of the ferroelectric oxides Pb(In.sub.1/2Nb.sub.1/2)O.sub.3Pb(Mg.sub.1/3Nb.sub.2/3)O.sub.3PbTiO.sub.3 can be improved by introducing more oxygen vacancies into the system, where the covalent bonding was dramatically weakened. Oxygen vacancies could also be introduced during the preloading stage under elevated temperatures and the vacuum condition in the SEM chamber. Considering our testing conditions, i.e., the temperature of 600 C. for 30 min under the vacuum of 110.sup.6 torr, the estimated diffusion length is much less than 0.4 m. Thus, such oxygen vacancy effects could be mostly on the surface but not on the entire pillar properties. In this case, the oxygen vacancies play a minor role comparing to those of high-density dislocations and stacking faults observed in the preloading pillars. Compared to flash sintering, the preloading concept is more general and can be widely utilized in a broad range of ceramic materials, including those that cannot be easily flash sintered.
[0038] Furthermore, to demonstrate the potential of the preloading method on improving the deformability of polycrystalline ceramics, similar preloading experiments were performed on a polycrystalline TiO.sub.2 bulk sample prepared by spark plasma sintering (SPS). Larger pillars with 7 m in diameter and a height of 14 m (a diameter-to-height aspect ratio of 1:2) were fabricated from the sample. Based on the preliminary data studied, it was obvious that the as-processed SPS TiO.sub.2 pillars were brittle when tested directly at RT, and the specimens fractured instantaneously and catastrophically. Micropillar compression tests at 600 C. show substantial plasticity. In comparison, subsequent room temperature compression tests on the preloaded pillar have endured a few percent of plastic strain before fracture, indicating the preloading treatment also improves the RT plasticity of the polycrystalline bulk samples. In this case, the orientation effects and size effects on the improved plasticity are considered to be minimal. Such studies suggest the preloading concept may be further scaled up to produce bulk ceramics or specific sections of large specimens and parts with prominent RT plasticity.
[0039] Thus, this disclosure demonstrates that defects can be introduced into the ceramics through preloading treatment under elevated temperatures for improving the RT deformability of high temperature ceramics. It is important to note that selecting an appropriate preloading temperature is crucial. If the temperature is below the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature, defects, including dislocations and SFs, will not form and thus will not improve the RT plasticity. However, if the preloading temperature is too high, some of the defects induced during preloading could be eliminated through annihilation process, reducing the impact of the preloading experiments on plasticity.
[0040] Thus, this disclosure describes and implements the concept that room-temperature plasticity in ceramics can be achieved by introducing mobile dislocations through an elevated temperature preloading approach. The in situ micropillar compression tests indicate that the SC TiO.sub.2 and SC Al.sub.2O.sub.3 can achieve substantial plasticity at RT if high density defects were introduced during the elevated temperature preloading. These pre-loading introduced mobile dislocations also allowed us to observe several interesting plastic deformation mechanisms at RT in ceramics, including the migration of SFs and twin boundaries and work hardening through the interaction of these defects, a tribute that has long been the privilege of ductile metallic materials. Introducing the preloading concept to bulk polycrystalline ceramics, as this disclosure demonstrated, could present great potential towards future designs of bulk ductile ceramics.
[0041] Based on the above description, it is an objective of this disclosure to describe a method for increasing the room temperature ductility of an object made of a ceramic material. The method contains the steps of providing an object made of a ceramic material; heating the object made of the ceramic material to a temperature to or above the brittle to ductile transition temperature of the ceramic material; introducing defects into the microstructure of the object by deforming the object at the temperature; and cooling the object to room temperature, resulting in room-temperature ductility higher than the room-temperature ductility of the object prior to the heating and deforming steps. In some embodiments of the method of this disclosure, the ceramic material is titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2). In some embodiments of the method of this disclosure, the ceramic material is Aluminum oxide (Al.sub.2O.sub.3). In some embodiments of the method, the temperature to which the object is heated is 10-50 degrees C. higher than the brittle-ductile transition temperature. As a guiding principle, the temperature to which the object is heated should be such that the defects such as dislocations, stacking faults and twins can form as result of deformation at that temperature. In some embodiments of the method of this disclosure, the deformation of the object is by compression. In many embodiments of the methods of this disclosure defects are introduced by deformation. Non-limiting examples of such defects are dislocations, stacking faults, and twins. In some embodiments of this disclosure, the resulting deformation strain at room temperature is 3.3 times higher than the deformation strain at room temperature prior to heating the object. In some embodiments of the methods of this disclosure, the resulting deformation strain at room temperature is 3.3 times higher than the deformation strain at room temperature prior to heating the object.
[0042] It is another objective of this disclosure to describe a ceramic material subjected to the methods of this disclosure. It is yet another objective of this disclosure to describe an object made of a ceramic material subjected to the methods of achieving room temperature ductility described above. In some embodiments of the object of this disclosure, the ceramic material is a structural material. In some embodiments of the object of this disclosure, the object is a structural component. In some embodiments of this disclosure the ceramic material subjected to the methods of this disclosure is TiO.sub.2 or Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
[0043] While the present disclosure has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the implementations should not be limited to the particular limitations described. Other implementations may be possible. It is therefore intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting. Thus, this disclosure is limited only by the following claims.