PHOTOCATALYSTS FOR WATER OXIDATION
20230160073 · 2023-05-25
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02P20/133
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C25B5/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C25B5/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present disclosure provides for a composition that includes a modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite, method of making the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite, an electrode having modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite surface and a photoelectrochemical cell including the electrode, and methods of photoelectrochemical oxidation of water. The modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite can be used in an electrode configuration, for example, in a photoelectrochemical cell for the photoelectrochemical oxidation of water. The present disclosure provides for a modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite that has a catechol compound(s) (e.g., oligo-catechol) adsorbed onto at least the M (metal) on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite.
Claims
1. A composition, comprising: a modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite having catechol compound adsorbed onto at least the M on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite, wherein the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a defect-free M/TiO.sub.2 interface, wherein the M/TiO.sub.2 composite has the characteristic of having a higher CO oxidation activity than that on the oxygen vacancy (Vo)-rich M/TiO.sub.2 interface.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the M/TiO.sub.2 composite is selected from the group consisting of: a Au/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Ag/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Cu/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Pd/TiO.sub.2 composite, and a Pt/TiO.sub.2 composite.
3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the catechol is an oligo-catechol.
4. The composition of claim 3, wherein the oligo-catechol includes 2 to 15 monomers in the backbone of the chain.
5. The composition of claim 3, wherein the oligo-catechol has a molecular weight about 110 to 600 g/mol.
6. The composition of claim 3, wherein the oligo-catechol is selected from one of: ##STR00001##
7. A photochemical cell, comprising: an electrode comprising modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite on the surface of the electrode, wherein the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite having catechol compound adsorbed onto at least the M on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite.
8. The photochemical cell of claim 7, wherein the M/TiO.sub.2 composite is selected from the group consisting of: a Au/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Ag/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Cu/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Pd/TiO.sub.2 composite, and a Pt/TiO.sub.2 composite.
9. The photochemical cell of claim 8, wherein the catechol is an oligo-catechol.
10. The photochemical cell of claim 8, wherein the oligo-catechol includes 2 to 15 monomers in the backbone of the chain.
11. The photochemical cell of claim 8, wherein the oligo-catechol has a molecular weight about 110 to 600 g/mol.
12. The photochemical cell of claim 8, wherein the oligo-catechol is selected from one of: ##STR00002##
13. A method of photoelectrochemical oxidation of water, comprising: exposing, in the presence of light, water to an electrode comprising modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite on the surface of the electrode, wherein the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite having catechol compound adsorbed onto at least the M on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite; and oxidizing the water to O.sub.2 and producing electricity.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the M/TiO.sub.2 composite is selected from the group consisting of: a Au/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Ag/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Cu/TiO.sub.2 composite, a Pd/TiO.sub.2 composite, and a Pt/TiO.sub.2 composite.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the catechol is an oligo-catechol.
16-18. (canceled)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] Further aspects of the present disclosure will be more readily appreciated upon review of the detailed description of its various embodiments, described below, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0062] Before the present disclosure is described in greater detail, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to particular embodiments described, and as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present disclosure will be limited only by the appended claims.
[0063] Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range, is encompassed within the disclosure. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges and are also encompassed within the disclosure, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the disclosure.
[0064] Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, the preferred methods and materials are now described.
[0065] As will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading this disclosure, each of the individual embodiments described and illustrated herein has discrete components and features which may be readily separated from or combined with the features of any of the other several embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. Any recited method can be carried out in the order of events recited or in any other order that is logically possible.
[0066] Embodiments of the present disclosure will employ, unless otherwise indicated, techniques of chemistry, materials science, mechanical engineering, and the like, which are within the skill of the art.
[0067] The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to perform the methods and use the probes disclosed and claimed herein. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers (e.g., amounts, temperature, etc.), but some errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by volume, temperature is in ° C., and pressure is at or near atmospheric. Standard temperature and pressure are defined as 20° C. and 1 atmosphere.
[0068] Before the embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail, it is to be understood that, unless otherwise indicated, the present disclosure is not limited to particular materials, reagents, reaction materials, manufacturing processes, or the like, as such can vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for purposes of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. It is also possible in the present disclosure that steps can be executed in different sequences where this is logically possible.
[0069] It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a compound” includes a plurality of compounds. In this specification and in the claims that follow, reference will be made to a number of terms that shall be defined to have the following meanings unless a contrary intention is apparent.
DISCUSSION
[0070] The present disclosure provides for a composition that includes a modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite, method of making the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite, an electrode having modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite surface and a photoelectrochemical cell including the electrode, and methods of photoelectrochemical oxidation of water. The modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a catechol compound(s) (e.g., oligo-catechol) adsorbed onto at least the M (metal) on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite. The modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a defect-free M/TiO.sub.2 interface. The modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite can be used in an electrode configuration, for example, in a photoelectrochemical cell for the photoelectrochemical oxidation of water.
[0071] In an aspect, photoelectrodeposited catechol molecules on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures can trap and stabilize photo-generated hot holes on Au and further introduce a new multi-hole reaction pathway in which those long-lived catechol-trapped holes cooperate with newly generated holes on Au. The new mechanism boosts photoelectrochemical water oxidation on Au by one order of magnitude.
[0072] In the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite the M can be Au, Ag, Al, Cu, Pt, or Pd. The M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a characteristic of having a higher CO oxidation activity than that on the oxygen vacancy (Vo)-rich M/TiO.sub.2 interface (without catechol). The M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a characteristic of having a higher CO oxidation activity than that on the oxygen vacancy (Vo)-rich M/TiO.sub.2 interface. In particular, the M/TiO.sub.2 composite has a characteristic of having a higher (e.g., at least 10 times, at least 15 times, at least 20 times, at least 25 times, at least 30 times, or at least 34 times) CO oxidation activity than that on the oxygen vacancy (Vo)-rich Au/TiO.sub.2 interface. When the M/TiO.sub.2 composite is a Au/TiO.sub.2 composite, the Au/TiO.sub.2 composite has a characteristic of having a higher (e.g., at least 10 times, at least 15 times, at least 20 times, at least 25 times, at least 30 times, or at least 34 times) CO oxidation activity than that on the oxygen vacancy (Vo)-rich Au/TiO.sub.2 interface.
[0073] The catechol compounds are adsorbed (e.g., physisorption and/or chemisorption) to the surface of the M/TiO.sub.2, in particular adsorbed to M. The catechol compounds can be an oligo-catechol that can include 2 to 15 or 2 to 5 monomers in the backbone of the chain. The oligo-catechol can have a molecular weight about 110 to 600 g/mol. As an example,
[0074] Although generally described here, additional details are provided in Example 1 regarding the method of making the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite. In general, the process for forming the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite on an electrode includes photochemically growing metal nanoparticles on the surface of a TiO.sub.2 electrode to form a M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode. Subsequently, the M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode is annealed to form an annealed M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode. The catechol monomers are then photoelectrodeposited onto the annealed M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode to form the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode having catechol compound adsorbed onto at least the M on the surface of the modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite electrode.
[0075] The present disclosure also includes a photochemical cell including the electrode comprising modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite on the surface of the electrode as well as one or more other electrodes used to perform the desired photochemical reaction. For example, the photoelectrochemical oxidation of water can be performed using the photochemical cell of the present disclosure. In particular, the method includes exposing, in the presence of light (e.g., natural or artificial light source (e.g., LED light source)), water to an electrode comprising modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite on the surface of the electrode and oxidizing the water to O.sub.2 and producing proton. Additional details regarding this process are provided in Example 1.
[0076] The present disclosure provides for electrochemical cells that include the composition that includes a modified M/TiO.sub.2 composite to oxidize water on the anode to produce O.sub.2 and a proton.
EXAMPLES
[0077] Now having described the embodiments of the present disclosure, in general, example 1 describes some additional embodiments of the present disclosure. While embodiments of the present disclosure are described in connection with example 1 and the corresponding text and figures, there is no intent to limit embodiments of the present disclosure to these descriptions. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents included within the spirit and scope of embodiments of the present disclosure.
Example 1
[0078] Numerous widely-tracked photochemical reactions, such as water oxidation and CO.sub.2 reduction, involve multiple hole/electron transfer to ultimately generate stable products..sup.1-6 Multi-carrier reactions are based on long-lived hot carriers and multiple oxidations/reductions of active sites..sup.3-4,6 Natural photosynthesis utilizes sophisticated redox cascade consisting of enzymes and molecular mediators (e.g., quinone)′ to trap and transport hot carriers for achieving efficient multiple charge transfer. However, design principles for modulating multiple charge transfer in artificial hot-carrier photochemistry remain undeveloped.
[0079] Metal nanoparticle photocatalysts (MNPs, e.g., Au and Ag) boast broadly tunable optical properties coupled with catalytically active sites that offer unique opportunities for visible-light photocatalysis..sup.8-26 The direct interband transition and nonradiative decay of surface plasmon resonance on MNPs generate hot electron-hole pairs that are promising for trigging photochemical reactions..sup.8-26 However, lifetimes of those hot carriers are extremely short (˜fs to ns).sup.8, 10-11 when compared to the slow kinetics of multi-carrier reactions (˜ms to s)..sup.3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 27-31 Numerous studies have used metal/semiconductor heterostructures to prolong lifetimes of hot electrons, thus improving low photocatalytic activities of reduction reactions..sup.32-34 Nonetheless, to date, very few works have been reported to manipulate photo-generated hot holes for extending their lifetimes to coincide with kinetically sluggish oxidation reactions.′ It is noteworthy that photo-generated holes possess faster relaxation dynamics and lower mobility than electrons,.sup.36-37 making it more difficult to trap and utilize them to promote the overall photochemical reaction efficiency.
[0080] Long-lived hot holes lay the foundation for triggering multi-hole reactions. Directly trapping and stabilizing multiple hot holes on MNP for driving reactions (Scheme 1a) is difficult due to extremely short lifetimes of hot holes.sup.9, 11-12 and the high energy barrier of multi-hole accumulation..sup.12, 30-31 A hole-trapping mediator (HTM) then is necessary for extending lifetimes of hot holes and initiating multi-hole reactions. For instance, sequential oxidations of HTM have been reported in dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells..sup.3 Similar multi-hole reaction pathway could also exist on MNP, in which the first trapped hole encounters the second trapped hole to enable a two-hole rate-determining step (RDS) solely taking place on HTM (Sequential oxidation pathway, Scheme 1b). Alternatively, HTM-stored hot holes would cooperate with newly-generated hot holes on MNP to drive the two-hole RDS at MNP/HTM interfaces (Multi-hole cooperation pathway, Scheme 1c).
[0081] In this work, we reported that photoelectrodeposited catechol on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures stabilized photo-generated hot holes on Au under visible-light illumination and triggered a multi-hole cooperation pathway for prompting water oxidation, a typical sluggish proton-coupled four-hole reaction. Our results showed that on pristine Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures, photo-generated hot holes were transferred from Au to TiO.sub.2 for driving multi-hole reactions via the sequential pathway, but the recombination of those hot holes with hot electrons also transferred to TiO.sub.2 severely limited the photoactivity. However, catechol molecules adsorbed on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures trapped and stabilized hot holes directly on Au and physically separated them from transferred hot electrons on TiO.sub.2. It was further demonstrated that catechol-trapped holes coupled with those newly generated holes on Au to trigger a cooperation pathway for driving water oxidation at Au/catechol interfaces. The new mechanism was found to boost photoelectrochemical water oxidation on Au by one order of magnitude.
Results and Discussion
[0082] Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures were constructed by photodepositing Au nanoparticles (NPs) on TiO.sub.2 electrodes (see the experimental section in supplementary information and
[0083] Long-lived holes provide opportunities to enable multi-hole reactions such as water oxidation..sup.2 The reaction order for TiO.sub.2-trapped holes in PEC water oxidation was measured to identify multi-hole reaction pathways (Supplementary Note 4,
[0084] Both aforementioned two-hole and four-hole reaction kinetics implied that TiO.sub.2 alone provided active sites for water oxidation, which should follow the sequential pathway as shown in Scheme 1 b. The sequential pathway required more than one hole to be trapped at HTM, but the sluggish proton-coupled hole transfer greatly hindered this process. On the other hand, it is noted that photo-generated hot holes and electrons on Au were both transferred and trapped on TiO.sub.2..sup.14′ .sup.32 Thus, it is inevitable that TiO.sub.2 would function as an electron-hole recombination center (
[0085] Molecular redox adsorbates have been demonstrated to trap and stabilize photo-generated hot holes..sup.43-44 For driving multi-hole reactions, adsorbates need to be redox-active and also stable under water-oxidation conditions..sup.3 Catechol, a reductive form of quinone derivatives that are commonly used as redox mediators in natural photosynthesis (PSII system).sup.45-46 and metal-organic complexes,.sup.44′ .sup.47-48 is expected to effectively store hot holes and assist multi-hole reactions when it adsorbs on Au surfaces in Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures.
[0086] Catechol was photoelectrodeposited on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures (Supplementary Note 6 and
[0087] The adsorption of catechol on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures was further found to lower the reaction order of TiO.sub.2-trapped holes in PEC water oxidation. When RDS only involved TiO.sub.2-trapped holes, the reaction order of TiO.sub.2-trapped holes was 2 (
[0088]
[0089] Those two reaction pathways can be distinguished by looking into the hot-hole trapping and releasing on Au as only the cooperation pathway involved newly generated holes on Au in RDS.
[0090] As shown in
[0091] LSV measurements on the Au/catechol electrode showed a largely enhanced photo-response (red curves in
CONCLUSION
[0092] We have successfully developed a molecular approach to stabilize photo-generated hot holes on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures for driving water oxidation under visible-light illumination. Since water oxidation represents a typical type of slow chemical reactions driven by multiple charge carriers, it is expected that the newly created reaction pathway, the multi-hole cooperation, would be extendable to various multi-hole (or -electron) photochemical reactions at metal/semiconductor or metal/molecule interfaces. Taken together, our studies provide a molecular-level understanding of hot-hole-induced photocatalysis, highlighting the visible-light-mediated multi-hole collaboration as a new avenue for facilitating photochemical processes.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
[0093] 1. Le Formal, F.; Pastor, E.; Tilley, S. D.; Mesa, C. A.; Pendlebury, S. R.; Gratzel, M.; Durrant, J. R., Rate Law Analysis of Water Oxidation on a Hematite Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6629-6637. [0094] 2. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Chen, C.; Song, W.; Zhao, J., Rate-Limiting 0-0 Bond Formation Pathways for Water Oxidation on Hematite Photoanode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3264-3269. [0095] 3. Chen, H.-Y.; Ardo, S., Direct observation of sequential oxidations of a titania-bound molecular proxy catalyst generated through illumination of molecular sensitizers. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 17-23. [0096] 4. Beiler, A. M.; Moore, G. F., Caught in the act. Nat. Chem. 2017, 10, 3. [0097] 5. Mesa, C. A.; Kafizas, A.; Frances, L.; Pendlebury, S. R.; Pastor, E.; Ma, Y.; Le Formal, F.; Mayer, M. T.; Gratzel, M.; Durrant, J. R., Kinetics of Photoelectrochemical Oxidation of Methanol on Hematite Photoanodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11537-11543. [0098] 6. Inoue, H.; Shimada, T.; Kou, Y.; Nabetani, Y.; Masui, D.; Takagi, S.; Tachibana, H., The Water Oxidation Bottleneck in Artificial Photosynthesis: How Can We Get Through It? An Alternative Route Involving a Two-Electron Process. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 173-179. [0099] 7. Anson, C. W.; Stahl, S. S., Cooperative Electrocatalytic 02 Reduction Involving Co(salophen) with p-Hydroquinone as an Electron—Proton Transfer Mediator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18472-18475. [0100] 8. Christopher, P.; Moskovits, M., Hot Charge Carrier Transmission from Plasmonic Nanostructures. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017, 68, 379-398. [0101] 9. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Guo, W.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J.; Mulcahy, J. R.; Wei, W. D., Surface-Plasmon-Driven Hot Electron Photochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2927-2954. [0102] 10. Linic, S.; Christopher, P.; Ingram, D. B., Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 911-921. [0103] 11. Brongersma, M. L.; Halas, N. J.; Nordlander, P., Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 25-34. [0104] 12. Aslam, U.; Rao, V. G.; Chavez, S.; Linic, S., Catalytic conversion of solar to chemical energy on plasmonic metal nanostructures. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 656-665. [0105] 13. Kazuma, E.; Jung, J.; Ueba, H.; Trenary, M.; Kim, Y., Real-space and real-time observation of a plasmon-induced chemical reaction of a single molecule. Science 2018, 360, 521-526. [0106] 14. Knight, M. W.; Sobhani, H.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J., Photodetection with Active Optical Antennas. Science 2011, 332, 702-704. [0107] 15. Zhou, L.; Swearer, D. F.; Zhang, C.; Robatjazi, H.; Zhao, H.; Henderson, L.; Dong, L.; Christopher, P.; Carter, E. A.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J., Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis. Science 2018, 362, 69-72. [0108] 16. Mubeen, S.; Lee, J.; Singh, N.; Kramer, S.; Stucky, G. D.; Moskovits, M., An autonomous photosynthetic device in which all charge carriers derive from surface plasmons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 247-251. [0109] 17. Zhang, Y.; Yam, C.; Schatz, G. C., Fundamental Limitations to Plasmonic Hot-Carrier Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1852-1858. [0110] 18. Brus, L., Noble Metal Nanocrystals: Plasmon Electron Transfer Photochemistry and Single-Molecule Raman Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1742-1749. [0111] 19. Sundararaman, R.; Narang, P.; Jermyn, A. S.; Goddard Hi, W. A.; Atwater, H. A., Theoretical predictions for hot-carrier generation from surface plasmon decay. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, [0112] 20. Hu, C.; Chen, X.; Jin, J.; Han, Y.; Chen, S.; Ju, H.; Cai, J.; Qiu, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, C.; Qi, Z.; Long, R.; Song, L.; Liu, Z.; Xiong, Y., Surface Plasmon Enabling Nitrogen Fixation in Pure Water through a Dissociative Mechanism under Mild Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7807-7814. [0113] 21. Zandi, 0.; Agrawal, A.; Shearer, A. B.; Reimnitz, L. C.; Dahlman, C. J.; Steller, C. M.; Milliron, D. J., Impacts of surface depletion on the plasmonic properties of doped semiconductor nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 710-717. [0114] 22. Tan, S.; Argondizzo, A.; Ren, J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, J.; Petek, H., Plasmonic coupling at a metal/semiconductor interface. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 806-812. [0115] 23. Shi, X.; Ueno, K.; Oshikiri, T.; Sun, Q.; Sasaki, K.; Misawa, H., Enhanced water splitting under modal strong coupling conditions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 953-958. [0116] 24. Kim, Y.; Smith, J. G.; Jain, P. K., Harvesting multiple electron—hole pairs generated through plasmonic excitation of Au nanoparticles. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 763-769. [0117] 25. Zhan, C.; Chen, X.-J.; Yi, J.; Li, J.-F.; Wu, D.-Y.; Tian, Z.-Q., From plasmon-enhanced molecular spectroscopy to plasmon-mediated chemical reactions. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 216-230. [0118] 26. Yang, W.-C. D.; Wang, C.; Fredin, L. A.; Lin, P. A.; Shimomoto, L.; Lezec, H. J.; Sharma, R., Site-selective CO disproportionation mediated by localized surface plasmon resonance excited by electron beam. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 614-619. [0119] 27. Zhai, Y.; DuChene, J. S.; Wang, Y.-C.; Qiu, J.; Johnston-Peck, A. C.; You, B.; Guo, W.; DiCiaccio, B.; Qian, K.; Zhao, E. W.; Ooi, F.; Hu, D.; Su, D.; Stach, E. A.; Zhu, Z.; Wei, W. D., Polyvinylpyrrolidone-induced anisotropic growth of gold nanoprisms in plasmon-driven synthesis. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 889-895. [0120] 28. Polte, J.; Erler, R.; Thünemann, A. F.; Sokolov, S.; Ahner, T. T.; Rademann, K.; Emmerling, F.; Kraehnert, R., Nucleation and Growth of Gold Nanoparticles Studied via in situ Small Angle X-ray Scattering at Millisecond Time Resolution. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1076-1082. [0121] 29. Le Formal, F.; Pendlebury, S. R.; Cornuz, M.; Tilley, S. D.; Grätzel, M.; Durrant, J. R., Back Electron—Hole Recombination in Hematite Photoanodes for Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2564-2574. [0122] 30. Wang, J.; Ding, T.; Wu, K., Charge Transfer from n-Doped Nanocrystals: Mimicking Intermediate Events in Multielectron Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7791-7794. [0123] 31. Wang, J.; Ding, T.; Wu, K., Electron Transfer into Electron-Accumulated Nanocrystals: Mimicking Intermediate Events in Multielectron Photocatalysis II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, [0124] 32. DuChene, J. S.; Sweeny, B. C.; Johnston-Peck, A. C.; Su, D.; Stach, E. A.; Wei, W. D., Prolonged Hot Electron Dynamics in Plasmonic-Metal/Semiconductor Heterostructures with Implications for Solar Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7887-7891. [0125] 33. Furube, A.; Du, L.; Hara, K.; Katoh, R.; Tachiya, M., Ultrafast Plasmon-Induced Electron Transfer from Gold Nanodots into TiO.sub.2 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14852-14853. [0126] 34. Jia, H.; Du, A.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Jiang, R.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.-y., Site-Selective Growth of Crystalline Ceria with Oxygen Vacancies on Gold Nanocrystals for Near-Infrared Nitrogen Photofixation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5083-5086. [0127] 35. Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Miao, S.; Liu, T.; Mu, L.; Li, R.; Fan, F.; Li, C., Positioning the Water Oxidation Reaction Sites in Plasmonic Photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11771-11778. [0128] 36. Liu, G.; Zhen, C.; Kang, Y.; Wang, L.; Cheng, H.-M., Unique physicochemical properties of two-dimensional light absorbers facilitating photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6410-6444. [0129] 37. Chen, R.; Pang, S.; An, H.; Zhu, J.; Ye, S.; Gao, Y.; Fan, F.; Li, C., Charge separation via asymmetric illumination in photocatalytic Cu.sub.2O particles. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 655-663. [0130] 38. Urso, C.; Barawi, M.; Gaspari, R.; Sirigu, G.; Kriegel, I.; Zavelani-Rossi, M.; Scotognella, F.; Manca, M.; Prato, M.; De Trizio, L.; Manna, L., Colloidal Synthesis of Bipolar Off-Stoichiometric Gallium Iron Oxide Spinel-Type Nanocrystals with Near-IR Plasmon Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 139, 1198-1206. [0131] 39. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ji, H.; Ma, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J., Pivotal Role and Regulation of Proton Transfer in Water Oxidation on Hematite Photoanodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2705-2711. [0132] 40. Kim, Y.-S.; Kriegel, S.; Harris, K. D.; Costentin, C.; Limoges, B.; Balland, V., Evidencing Fast, Massive, and Reversible H+ Insertion in Nanostructured TiO.sub.2 Electrodes at Neutral pH. Where Do Protons Come From? J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 10325-10335. [0133] 41. Klahr, B.; Gimenez, S.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Hamann, T. W., Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of water oxidation with hematite electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7626-7636. [0134] 42. You, B.; Sun, Y., Innovative Strategies for Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 1571-1580. [0135] 43. La Croix, A. D.; O'Hara, A.; Reid, K. R.; Orfield, N. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Rosenthal, S. J.; Macdonald, J. E., Design of a Hole Trapping Ligand. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 909-914. [0136] 44. Tachan, Z.; Hod, I.; Zaban, A., The TiO.sub.2-Catechol Complex: Coupling Type II Sensitization with Efficient Catalysis of Water Oxidation. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301249. [0137] 45. Rappaport, F.; Diner, B. A., Primary photochemistry and energetics leading to the oxidation of the (Mn).sub.4Ca cluster and to the evolution of molecular oxygen in Photosystem II. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 259-272. [0138] 46. Kato, M.; Cardona, T.; Rutherford, A. W.; Reisner, E., Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation with Photosystem II Integrated in a Mesoporous Indium-Tin Oxide Electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8332-8335. [0139] 47. Wada, T.; Tsuge, K.; Tanaka, K., Electrochemical oxidation of water to dioxygen catalyzed by the oxidized form of the bis(ruthenium-hydroxo) complex in H20. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1479-1481. [0140] 48. Tanaka, K.; Isobe, H.; Yamanaka, S.; Yamaguchi, K., Similarities of artificial photosystems by ruthenium oxo complexes and native water splitting systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2012, 109, 15600-15605. [0141] 49. Wada, T.; Tsuge, K.; Tanaka, K., Syntheses and Redox Properties of Bis(hydroxoruthenium) Complexes with Quinone and Bipyridine Ligands. Water-Oxidation Catalysis. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 329-337. [0142] 50. Muckerman, J. T.; Polyansky, D. E.; Wada, T.; Tanaka, K.; Fujita, E., Water Oxidation by a Ruthenium Complex with Noninnocent Quinone Ligands: Possible Formation of an 0-0 Bond at a Low Oxidation State of the Metal. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1787-1802. [0143] 51. Wang, P.; Krasavin, A. V.; Nasir, M. E.; Dickson, W.; Zayats, A. V., Reactive tunnel junctions in electrically driven plasmonic nanorod metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 159-164. [0144] 52. Guttentag, A. I.; Wachter, T.; Barr, K. K.; Abendroth, J. M.; Song, T.-B.; Sullivan, N. F.; Yang, Y.; Allara, D. L.; Zharnikov, M.; Weiss, P. S., Surface Structure and Electron Transfer Dynamics of the Self-Assembly of Cyanide on Au{111}. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 26736-26746.
Supplemental Information for Example 1
[0145] Experimental section
Materials: Tetrachloroauric acid (HAuCl.sub.4, 99.99%), Titanium (IV) butoxide (97%), 1,2-Dihydroxybenzene (99%), 4-Nitrocatechol (97%), 3,4-Dihydroxybenzonitrile (97%), Sodium sulfite (98%), Methanol (99.8%), Ethanol (>99.5%), and Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, >97.0%) was purchased from Fisher
Scientific. Deuterated water (D.sub.2O, 99.9%) were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.
Instrumentation: Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra were collected on a Shimadzu UV-2600 spectrophotometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were collected on an FEI Nova Nano 430 SEM operated at 15 kV at the Nanoscale Research Facility of University of Florida (UF). Photoelectrochemical (PEC) measurements were controlled by a potentiostat (PGSTAT302N autolab, Metrohm). Additional dual mode bipotentiostat (BA) module and PX1000 module were used for dual-working electrode (DWE) PEC experiments. Three mono-wavelength LED lamps (470 nm, 530 nm, and 630 nm) controlled by PGSTAT302N were used as light sources. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained using a PHI VersaProbe Scanning XPS Microscope (Al Kα) with an energy resolution of 0.1 eV. 0.21 kV Argon ions were used to neutralize surface charge. Adventitious carbon with the binding energy of 284.8 eV was used as a reference for calibration. Annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (ADF-STEM) imaging was conducted on a Cs-corrected Hitachi HD-2700C microscope equipped with a Cold-FEG and operated at 200 kV (located at BNL, Upton, NY). Images were acquired using a probe convergence angle of 23 mrad, with the inner collection angle of ADF detector at 53 mrad. Liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) data were obtained using an LCQ DECA quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization (ESI) operating with XCALIBUR 2.0.7. SP1. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted using Agilent (Palo Alto, Calif.) 1100 series system consisting of G1313A autosampler, G1322A degasser, and G1312A binary pump. Mobile phase A was H.sub.2O+0.2% acetic acid and phase B was methanol+0.2% acetic acid.
Fabrication of Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes: Rutile TiO.sub.2 nanowire electrodes were fabricated using a hydrothermal method.′ FTO substrates were first cleaned in a mixed solution of 10 mL of acetone, 10 mL of 2-propanol, and 10 mL of nanopure water for 1 h ultrasonication. FTO substrates then were rinsed using nanopure water, airdried, and placed at an angle against the sidewall of a 40 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. In a separate 100 mL beaker, 15 mL of nanopure water and 15 mL of concentrated HCl (37 wt %) were mixed, followed by addition of 500 μL of Ti (IV) butoxide. The solution was stirred for 5 min and poured into a 40 mL Teflon-lined autoclave containing FTO substrates. Hydrothermal synthesis was conducted in an oven at 150° C. for 5 h. Photochemical growth of Au nanoparticles (NPs) on TiO.sub.2 electrodes was performed in a solution containing 200 μL of methanol, 250 μL of 10 mM HAuCl.sub.4, and 4.8 mL of nanopure water in a 50-mL beaker. The solution was irradiated for 5 min with a 500 W Hg lamp (full spectrum). Briefly ultrasonicating electrodes in water (˜5 s) removed Au NPs not strongly bound to TiO.sub.2 nanowires. Electrodes were further annealed under 200° C. for 10 min in a tube furnace. For fabricating DWE, a 10 nm Au film was deposited on Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes by sputtering (model KJL CMS-18 MULTI-SOURCE).
Fabrication of Au NP electrodes: A 10 nm Au film was deposited on FTO substrates by sputtering (model KJL CMS-18 MULTI-SOURCE). Further annealing under 600° C. for 1 h converted the Au film to Au NPs.
Photoelectrodeposition of catechol and charging of modified electrodes: As-prepared Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes and Au NP electrodes were immersed in a 0.1 M catechol solution for 24 h in the dark and then an anodic bias of 1.0 V.sub.RHE was applied to electrodes for 240-600 s under the irradiation of a 470 nm LED. After being modified with catechol, electrodes were rinsed with nanopure water to remove catechol weakly bound to the electrodes. Then electrodes were put into an unbuffered solution with pH 7.0 (0.1 M NaClO.sub.4). A bias of 1.2 V.sub.RHE was held for 1 h under 470 nm illumination to fully charge electrodes with hot holes. Those as-prepared electrodes were moved to a clean unbuffered solution with pH 7.0 for PEC water-oxidation measurement.
Photodeposition of catechol on Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes: As-prepared Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes were immersed in a 0.1 M catechol solution under the irradiation of a 470 nm LED for 10 h. After being modified with catechol, electrodes were rinsed with nanopure water to remove catechol weakly bound to the electrodes.
PEC measurement: Conventional PEC experiments were performed in a three-electrode electrochemical cell and DWE PEC experiments were performed in a four-electrode electrochemical cell, both with Pt as the counter electrode and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. For electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), experimental data were fitted and simulated using Nova 1.11 from Metrohm Inc. pH values of electrolyte solutions were measured using a pH meter, and pD values were calculated using the equation pD=pH.sub.read+0.4..sup.2 Concentrations of dissolved O.sub.2 were measured using a YSI Professional Optical Dissolved Oxygen Meter. N.sub.2 was purged into electrolyte for 1 h to remove dissolved O.sub.2. It is noted that unbuffered solutions with pH 7.0 (0.1 M NaClO.sub.4) and pH 13.6 (1 M NaOH) were used as electrolytes for main results in the manuscript. Buffer (e.g., PO.sub.4.sup.3-) was not used since previous works reported that buffer species influenced charge separations and surface proton transfer processes on semiconductors..sup.2-3 Experimental results obtained in the buffered solution (0.1 M PO.sub.4.sup.3-) were only shown in the supplementary information for reference. It also needs to be noted that catechol molecules adsorb on Au via hydroxyl groups. When performing the reaction in alkaline solutions, the competitive adsorption between hydroxyl groups and OH.sup.−ions in the electrolyte would further decrease the stability of Au/catechol electrodes for water oxidation. Therefore, all those catechol-modified electrodes were tested in the neutral medium.
Supplementary Note 1. Open-circuit potential (OCP) measurement
[0146] OCP measurement was performed on a Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode. As shown in
[0147] Average lifetimes of photo-generated carriers were calculated from OCP decays (
[0148] where T.sub.n represents average lifetimes of photo-generated carriers, k.sub.B is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature (in Kelvin), q is the charge of an electron.
[0149] The exponential decay equation was also applied to get time constants considering that the existence of both fast and slow components of OCP decays:
y=y.sub.0+A.sub.1e.sup.−x/t.sup.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE S1 Calculated time constants using the exponential decay equation y.sub.0 (V) A.sub.1 (V) t.sub.1 (s) A.sub.2 (V) t.sub.2 (s) unbuffered pH 7.0 0.75 −0.090 2.05 −0.085 38.74 buffered pH 7.0 0.69 −0.100 2.04 −0.100 38.34 pH 13.6 0.88 −0.400 0.44 −0.038 10.76
Supplementary Note 2. Technique Issues in DWE Measurements
[0150] Before sputtering a 10 nm Au film, bare FTO on Au/TiO.sub.2 electrodes was partially coated with epoxy resin that slightly touched the Au/TiO.sub.2 part. The remained bare FTO was fully covered with Scotch tape. After sputtering, the Scotch tape was carefully peeled off with a razor blade and this exposed FTO was used as the first working electrode connection. The second working electrode connection was made by Cu conductive tape with Ag paint connected with the Au film that covered epoxy resin (
[0151] Previous DWE work emphasized that a conformal and crack-free electrocatalyst film was necessary to prevent short contact between the top Au film and bottom semiconductor substrates..sup.7-9 In those studies, bottom semiconductor substrates were photo-excited,.sup.7-9 and the short contact would lead to a direct charge transfer from bottom semiconductor substrates to the top Au film. Since our research target was Au NPs, the short contact between the second working electrode Au film and the TiO.sub.2 substrate cannot be avoided. Nonetheless, analysis of transfer of electrons and holes in the as-prepared dual-working Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode suggested that the short contact between the Au film and TiO.sub.2 should not be an issue for our study. As shown in
[0152] Moreover, the Au film directly sputtered on TiO.sub.2 did not show pronounced PEC water oxidation activity (
[0153] A comparison of LSV traces between the pristine Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode and the dual-working Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode showed that PEC behaviors (onset potential and saturated photocurrent) were not remarkably affected by the additional Au film (
[0154] Previous DWE studies employed back-illuminations (i.e., from FTO sides to semiconductor substrates) to avoid light absorption of the additional Au film..sup.8 In our study, although the sputtered Au film also had visible-light absorption (
[0155] Conductivity of the second working electrode was also a critical issue that needed to be addressed in the research of DWE..sup.7-8 It was found that holding an additional bias on the second working electrode (the same potential was applied on the first working electrode, TiO.sub.2, simultaneously) led to ˜93% decrease of the photocurrent obtained from TiO.sub.2 (by comparing
Supplementary Note 3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
[0156] Surface-trapped holes on a Au/TiO.sub.2 photoanode under PEC water oxidation was investigated by fitting and simulating EIS data using a well-developed electric model. As shown in
[0157] The series resistance R.sub.s was a constant (˜10 Ω as shown in Table S2) under various mono-wavelength irradiations and applied potentials, indicating that the fitting and simulation process was reliable for Au/TiO.sub.2.sup.11 C.sub.trap decreased with the applied bias while R.sub.ct,trap increased with the applied bias (
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE S2 Parameters calculated from EIS data obtained under various illuminations Potential R.sub.s C.sub.H R.sub.trapping R.sub.ct,trap C.sub.trap T.sub.trap Wavelength (V.sub.RHE) (Ω) (μF) (Ω) (Ω) (μF) (s) 470 nm 0.4 10.6 13.2 419 2190 159.0 0.34 0.5 10.5 11.5 531 3940 59.0 0.23 0.6 10.4 11.6 707 8060 30.4 0.24 0.7 10.3 11.6 949 15600 19.5 0.30 0.8 10.3 10.9 928 29200 16.4 0.48 1.0 10.3 10.2 622 91500 13.9 1.27 1.2 10.3 10.4 508 120000 14.2 1.70 530 nm 0.5 10.5 11.1 1860 10700 31.9 0.34 0.6 10.4 10.9 2810 22300 15.8 0.35 0.7 10.4 10.7 3700 53600 11.3 0.60 0.8 10.4 10.6 5260 135000 9.3 1.25 1.0 10.4 10.4 5060 192000 9.0 1.72 1.2 10.4 10.7 6060 — 10.7 — 630 nm 0.6 9.1 11.4 1720 15300 19.0 0.29 0.7 9.2 10.8 3030 26900 14.8 0.39 0.8 9.2 10.4 3880 70300 15.4 1.08 0.9 9.3 10.1 3380 416000 13.1 5.40 1.0 9.3 10.2 4390 — 11.4 — 1.2 9.3 10.5 6870 — 12.1 —
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE S3 Parameters calculated from EIS data obtained under various electrolyte conditions Potential R.sub.s C.sub.H R.sub.trapping R.sub.ct,trap C.sub.trap T.sub.trap (V.sub.RHE) (Ω) (μF) (Ω) (Ω) (μF) (s) Unbuffered 0.5 17.4 11.7 297 1240 302.0 0.37 pH 7.0 0.6 17.2 11.3 326 1830 213.0 0.39 0.7 17.2 10.7 363 1860 171.0 0.32 0.8 17.1 10.3 408 2950 84.4 0.25 0.9 17.0 11.3 583 5920 39.4 0.23 1.0 16.8 12.3 996 13600 22.0 0.30 1.1 16.8 11.8 1320 28200 16.7 0.47 Buffered 0.4 29.3 16.1 399 817 147.0 0.12 pH 7.0 0.5 28.9 13.5 480 2990 94.7 0.28 0.6 28.4 13.8 796 6920 38.2 0.26 0.7 28.0 13.7 1330 16600 20.4 0.34 0.8 27.9 13.4 2070 32900 14.2 0.47 0.9 27.7 13.1 3310 53100 11.5 0.61 1.0 27.5 12.6 4700 76100 10.8 0.82 pH 13.6 0.4 10.6 13.2 419 2190 159.0 0.35 0.5 10.5 11.5 531 3940 59.0 0.23 0.6 10.4 11.6 707 8060 30.4 0.25 0.7 10.3 11.6 949 15600 19.5 0.30 0.8 10.3 10.9 928 29200 16.4 0.48 1.0 10.3 10.2 622 91500 13.9 1.27 1.2 10.3 10.4 508 120000 14.2 1.70
Supplementary Note 4. Equations for Reaction Order Analysis
[0158] Under steady state, the water-oxidation rate (photocurrent density, J in μA/cm.sup.2) is related to the surface hole density ([hole] in nm-2) as:.sup.14-15
J=k.sub.wo[holes]
Log J=βlog([holes])+logk.sub.wo
Where k.sub.m is the water oxidation rate constant, and β is the reaction order of surface trapped holes.
[0159] Surface hole density was calculated from EIS results based on the model circuit displayed in
[0160] where V.sub.appl is the applied potential and S is the active area of electrodes.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE S4 Parameters calculated from EIS data obtained under various electrolyte conditions for rate law analysis Light intensity R.sub.s R.sub.trapping C.sub.H R.sub.ct,trap C.sub.trap [hole] log J log (mW .Math. cm.sup.−2) (Ω) (Ω) (μF) (Ω) (μF) (nm.sup.−2) [hole] (μA .Math. cm.sup.−2) J pH 7.0 500 26.5 240 9.6 5320 420.0 3.120 0.494 1.75 0.243 0.5 V.sub.RHE 453 26.5 250 9.7 4800 374.0 2.758 0.441 1.25 0.097 402 26.5 263 9.7 5140 335.0 2.474 0.393 1.00 0.000 345 26.4 295 9.6 5080 280.0 2.054 0.313 0.75 −0.125 277 26.4 354 9.5 5110 220.0 1.597 0.203 0.50 −0.301 pH 7.0 500 26.4 352 8.9 3380 61.9 0.612 −0.213 12.25 1.088 0.7 V.sub.RHE 453 26.3 369 9.1 3580 58.3 0.578 −0.238 10.25 1.011 402 26.3 418 9.3 3970 53.6 0.530 −0.276 8.75 0.942 345 26.4 503 9.4 4700 46.5 0.460 −0.338 7.00 0.845 277 26.4 635 9.4 6000 39.4 0.390 −0.409 5.75 0.760 pH 13.6 500 15.6 692 11.3 4480 35.1 0.236 −0.626 6.25 0.796 0.5 V.sub.RHE 453 15.6 717 11.4 4880 34.0 0.231 −0.637 5.50 0.740 402 15.5 786 11.3 5300 32.8 0.222 −0.653 4.75 0.677 345 15.6 878 11.1 5850 31.3 0.212 −0.674 4.00 0.602 277 15.6 1010 10.9 6580 29.1 0.196 −0.707 2.75 0.439 pH 13.6 500 18.9 1300 10.5 11600 11.1 0.110 −0.960 13.00 1.114 0.7 V.sub.RHE 453 18.9 1340 10.6 12500 10.4 0.103 −0.986 11.25 1.051 402 18.9 1450 10.5 13000 10.0 0.099 −1.005 9.50 0.978 345 18.9 1600 10.3 13500 9.8 0.096 −1.016 8.00 0.903 277 18.9 1960 10.2 13900 9.5 0.091 −1.039 6.00 0.778 pH 13.6 500 16.9 871 12.2 115 24.8 0.057 −1.245 27.50 1.439 Na.sub.2SO.sub.3 453 16.8 854 11.7 125 21.8 0.055 −1.262 23.75 1.376 1.3 V.sub.RHE 402 16.9 918 11.0 161 16.5 0.048 −1.314 19.00 1.279 345 16.9 1010 10.6 166 16.6 0.046 −1.335 17.25 1.237 277 16.9 1140 10.1 212 12.3 0.038 −1.419 13.25 1.122
[0161] H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiment was performed to further confirm whether H.sub.2O molecules could be oxidized by hot holes, as oxidation of H.sub.2O molecules would lead to a pronounced KIE according to the previous PEC water oxidation research on semiconductors..sup.2 LSV curves of the Au/TiO.sub.2 photoanode exhibited no significant difference between H.sub.2O and D.sub.2O under pH/pD 7.0, excluding the possibility to have the O—H bond cleavage in RDS. Therefore, the oxidation of H.sub.2O molecules should not be the major contribution to PEC activities. Instead, the oxidation of OH.sup.−contributed to observed PEC activities in our work.
[0162] The Fermi level of Au is located ˜0.3 V more cathodic than the redox potential of O.sub.2/H.sub.2O..sup.5 Considering that photo-generated hot holes on metals quickly relax to the Fermi level before chemical reactions occur,.sup.22 those photo-generated holes are not able to directly drive the oxidation of H.sub.2O molecules. Hence, it is reasonable that the oxidation of OH.sup.− mainly contributes to PEC activities.
Supplementary Note 5. Simultaneous Photocurrent Measurement of Dual-Working Au/TiO.SUB.2 .Electrodes
[0163] Simultaneous photocurrent measurement was performed on Au and TiO.sub.2 of a dual-working Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode to study the electron transfer dynamics under quasi open-circuit conditions. Constant potentials were simultaneously applied on TiO.sub.2 and Au, and the electric force applied on TiO.sub.2 was offset from that on Au to mimic open-circuit conditions while still generated photocurrents on both TiO.sub.2 and Au. The photocurrent obtained from TiO.sub.2 was reduced by ˜93% (5 μA,
[0164] It is noted that under quasi open-circuit conditions, the photocurrent on TiO.sub.2 was about two orders of magnitude higher than that on Au (under 470 nm irradiation in
Supplementary Note 6. Preparation of Catechol-Modified Au/TiO.SUB.2 .Electrodes
[0165] Catechol was photoelectrodeposited on Au/TiO.sub.2 heterostructures under 1.0 VRHE and 470 nm irradiation for 240 s (
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE S5 Molecular weight (MW) of oligo-catechol obtained from LC-MS. oligo-catechol Retention oligo- time catechol control catechol (RT) RT catechol MW (min) Total Area (min) Total Area control MW 218 19.78 144,385,064 19.82 1,827,528 79.01 MW 218 22.58 80,669,676 22.61 2,067,386 39.02 m/z 443 23.92 1,873,403 nd* ion MW 218 25.45 107,152,534 25.45 2,566,451 41.75 MW 218 25.90 15,132,772 nd MW 218 28.17 1,153,760 28.18 775,180 1.49 MW 326 23.92 9,714,149 nd MW 216 34.12 6,176,494 nd nd*: not detected.
Supplementary Note 7. Catechol-Modified TiO.SUB.2 .Electrodes
[0166] Previous studies reported that catechol adsorbed on TiO.sub.2 also introduced visible-light activity owing to the LMCT (ligand to metal charge transfer) mechanism..sup.24-25
Supplementary Note 8. Rate law analysis on the catechol-modified Au/TiO.sub.2 electrode
[0167] Analysis of the variation of reaction orders:
A=intermediate in RDS of water oxidation
B=holes trapped on TiO.sub.2
C=holes trapped on catechol
D=holes on Au
(1) B+B→A
[0168]
When RDS only involves two TiO.sub.2-trapped holes, the reaction order of TiO.sub.2-trapped holes is 2.
(2)B+C→A
[0169]
When RDS involves one TiO.sub.2-trapped hole and one catechol-trapped hole, the reaction order of TiO.sub.2-trapped holes is 1.
(3)B+C→A;D+C→A
[0170]
When RDS involves two parallel elementary steps, the reaction order of TiO.sub.2-trapped holes is below 1.
Supplementary Note 9. Preparation of catechol-modified Au NP electrodes
[0171] Catechol was photoelectrodeposited on a Au NP electrode under 1.0 V.sub.RHE and 470 nm irradiation for 600 s (
Supplementary Note 10. Comparisons Among Modified Au NP Electrodes Using Catechol, 3,4-Dihydroxybenzonitrile, and 4-Nitrocatechol
[0172] Two catechol derivatives were used to modify Au NP electrodes, i.e., 3,4-dihydroxybenzonitrile (catechol with nitrile (—C≡N) substituent, abbreviated as cyanide-catechol), and 4-nitrocatechol. Cyanide-catechol was used for exploring the influence of adsorption mode (
Q.sub.o.sub.
Q.sub.photocurrent=0.042C
FE%=86%
[0173] When further extending the reaction time, the photocurrent exhibited a very slow and continuous decayed within 20 hours. This decay should be due to the slow desorption of catechol molecules from Au surfaces under the harsh water-oxidation condition. Further improvement on the long-term stability of catechol-modified Au surfaces could be realized by molecular design, such as adding an Au-anchoring group adjacent to the hydroxyl group in catechol.
Supplementary Note 11. Catechol-Modified FTO Electrodes
[0174] The catechol-modified FTO electrode (
References for the Supplemental Information
[0175] 1. DuChene, J. S.; Sweeny, B. C.; Johnston-Peck, A. C.; Su, D.; Stach, E. A.; Wei, W. D., Prolonged Hot Electron Dynamics in Plasmonic-Metal/Semiconductor Heterostructures with Implications for Solar Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7887-7891. [0176] 2. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ji, H.; Ma, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J., Pivotal Role and Regulation of Proton Transfer in Water Oxidation on Hematite Photoanodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2705-2711. [0177] 3. Sheng, H.; Li, Q.; Ma, W.; Ji, H.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J., Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants on Surface Anionized TiO.sub.2: Common Effect of Anions for High Hole-availability by Water. Appl. Catal. B: Environ 2013, 138-139, 212-218. [0178] 4. Sundararaman, R.; Narang, P.; Jermyn, A. S.; Goddard III, W. A.; Atwater, H. A., Theoretical Predictions for Hot-carrier Generation from Surface Plasmon Decay. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5788. [0179] 5. Hung, S.-F.; Xiao, F.-X.; Hsu, Y.-Y.; Suen, N.-T.; Yang, H.-B.; Chen, H. M.; Liu, B., Iridium Oxide-Assisted Plasmon-Induced Hot Carriers: Improvement on Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Hot Carriers. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2016, 6, 1501339. [0180] 6. Schlather, A. E.; Manjavacas, A.; Lauchner, A.; Marangoni, V. S.; DeSantis, C. J.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J., Hot Hole Photoelectrochemistry on Au@SiO.sub.2@Au Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 2060-2067. [0181] 7. Lin, F.; Boettcher, S. W., Adaptive Semiconductor/Electrocatalyst Junctions in Water-splitting Photoanodes. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 81-86. [0182] 8. Qiu, J.; Hajibabaei, H.; Nellist, M. R.; Laskowski, F. A. L.; Hamann, T. W.; Boettcher, S. W., Direct in Situ Measurement of Charge Transfer Processes During Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation on Catalyzed Hematite. ACS Central Sci. 2017, 3, 1015-1025. [0183] 9. Aslam, U.; Chavez, S.; Linic, S., Controlling Energy Flow in Multimetallic Nanostructures for Plasmonic Catalysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1000-1005. [0184] 10. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Song, W.; Zhou, P.; Ji, H.; Ma, W.; Hao, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J., Nonmetal P-doped Hematite Photoanode with Enhanced Electron Mobility and High Water Oxidation Activity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1231-1236. [0185] 11. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, C.; Che, Y.; Ji, H.; Ma, W.; Zhang, J.; Song, D.; Zhao, J., Gradient FeO.sub.x(PO.sub.4).sub.y Layer on Hematite Photoanodes: Novel Structure for Efficient Light-Driven Water Oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 12844-12851. [0186] 12. Klahr, B.; Gimenez, S.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Hamann, T. W., Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Investigation of Water Oxidation with Hematite Electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7626-7636. [0187] 13. Klahr, B.; Gimenez, S.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Hamann, T.; Bisquert, J., Water Oxidation at Hematite Photoelectrodes: the Role of Surface States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4294-302. [0188] 14. Le Formal, F.; Pastor, E.; Tilley, S. D.; Mesa, C. A.; Pendlebury, S. R.; Grätzel, M.; Durrant, J. R., Rate Law Analysis of Water Oxidation on a Hematite Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6629-6637. [0189] 15. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Chen, C.; Song, W.; Zhao, J., Rate-Limiting 0-0 Bond Formation Pathways for Water Oxidation on Hematite Photoanode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3264-3269. [0190] 16. Nakamura, R.; Nakato, Y., Primary Intermediates of Oxygen Photoevolution Reaction on TiO.sub.2 (Rutile) Particles, Revealed by in Situ FTIR Absorption and Photoluminescence Measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1290-1298. [0191] 17. Migani, A.; Blancafort, L., What Controls Photocatalytic Water Oxidation on Rutile TiO.sub.2(110) under Ultra-High-Vacuum Conditions? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11845-11856. [0192] 18. Liu, F.; Feng, N.; Wang, Q.; Xu, J.; Qi, G.; Wang, C.; Deng, F., Transfer Channel of Photoinduced Holes on a TiO.sub.2 Surface As Revealed by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10020-10028. [0193] 19. Shirai, K.; Fazio, G.; Sugimoto, T.; Selli, D.; Ferraro, L.; Watanabe, K.; Haruta, M.; Ohtani, B.; Kurata, H.; Di Valentin, C.; Matsumoto, Y., Water-Assisted Hole Trapping at the Highly Curved Surface of Nano-TiO.sub.2 Photocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 4, 1415-1422. [0194] 20. Cheng, J.; Sprik, M., Acidity of the Aqueous Rutile TiO.sub.2(110) Surface from Density Functional Theory Based Molecular Dynamics. J. Chem Theo. and Comput. 2010, 6, 880-889. [0195] 21. Zheng, B. Y.; Zhao, H.; Manjavacas, A.; McClain, M.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J., Distinguishing Between Plasmon-induced and Photoexcited Carriers in a Device Geometry. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7797. [0196] 22. Christopher, P.; Moskovits, M., Hot Charge Carrier Transmission from Plasmonic Nanostructures. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017, 68, 379-398. [0197] 23. Wu, K.; Chen, J.; McBride, J. R.; Lian, T., Efficient Hot-electron Transfer by a Plasmon-induced Interfacial Charge-transfer Transition. Science 2015, 349, 632-635. [0198] 24. Lana-Villarreal, T.; Rodes, A.; Perez, J. M.; Gómez, R., A Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Approach to the Study of the Interactions and Photoinduced Electron Transfer between Catechol and Anatase Nanoparticles in Aqueous Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12601-12611. [0199] 25. Tachan, Z.; Hod, I.; Zaban, A., The TiO.sub.2—Catechol Complex: Coupling Type II Sensitization with Efficient Catalysis of Water Oxidation. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301249. [0200] 26. Pochon, A.; Vaughan, P. P.; Gan, D.; Vath, P.; Blough, N. V.; Falvey, D. E., Photochemical Oxidation of Water by 2-Methyl-1,4-benzoquinone: Evidence against the Formation of Free Hydroxyl Radical. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 2889-2894.