SMART SOFT ACTUATION UNIT FOR UNDERWATER APPLICATIONS

Abstract

Disclosed are soft origami actuators with embedded optical waveguides and underwater manipulator applications.

Claims

1. A device for underwater applications, comprising: a photodiode tube; an LED tube; a soft origami fluidic actuator between the photodiode tube and LED tube; a plurality of optical waveguides configured to follow motion of the soft origami fluidic actuator; and a plurality of sensors.

2. The device for underwater applications according to claim 1, with the proviso that each of the plurality of optical waveguides does not comprise a cladding layer.

3. The device for underwater applications according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of optical waveguides comprises a core layer comprising transparent silicone rubber.

4. The device for underwater applications according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is an optical sensor.

5. The device for underwater applications according to claim 1, further comprising a hydraulic control system and gripper.

6. The device for underwater applications according to claim 1, comprising three optical waveguides.

7. An underwater robot, comprising: a photodiode tube; an LED tube; a soft origami fluidic actuator between the photodiode tube and LED tube; a plurality of optical waveguides configured to follow motion of the soft origami fluidic actuator; and a plurality of sensors.

8. The underwater robot according to claim 7, with the proviso that each of the plurality of optical waveguides does not comprise a cladding layer.

9. The underwater robot according to claim 7, wherein each of the plurality of optical waveguides comprises a core layer comprising transparent silicone rubber.

10. The underwater robot according to claim 7, wherein at least one of the plurality of sensors is an optical sensor.

11. The underwater robot according to claim 7, further comprising a hydraulic control system and gripper.

12. The underwater robot according to claim 7, comprising three optical waveguides.

Description

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008] FIG. 1 depicts an underwater manipulator and the soft origami fluidic actuator with embedded optical waveguide in accordance with an embodiment.

[0009] FIG. 2a depicts a soft origami fluidic actuator in accordance with an embodiment.

[0010] FIG. 2b depicts three schematic drawings of SOFA. Sc is the contact area between upper and lower surface of the optical waveguide in accordance with an embodiment.

[0011] FIG. 2c depicts an example of a soft optical waveguide fabrication process in accordance with an embodiment.

[0012] FIG. 2d depicts a SOFA exposed view and assembly in accordance with an embodiment.

[0013] FIG. 3a depicts a schematic drawing of SOFA, illustrating the relationship between critical angle and the orientation of the actuator.

[0014] FIG. 3b is a graphical illustration of SOFA concept validation test results.

[0015] FIG. 3c is a graphical illustration of SOFA bending test results of pitch.

[0016] FIG. 3d depicts a SOFA bending test platform setup.

[0017] FIG. 3e depicts a SOFA concept validation test platform setup. The elongation & contraction test setup is the same, except there are three optical waveguides in the elongation & contraction test.

[0018] FIG. 3f reports a graphical illustration of SOFA elongation & contraction test results.

[0019] FIG. 3g reports a graphical illustration of SOFA bending test results of roll.

[0020] FIG. 4a depicts a hybrid underwater manipulator in accordance with an embodiment.

[0021] FIG. 4b Schematic drawing of the gripper. Elongation of the actuator closes the gripper.

[0022] FIG. 4c depicts a hybrid underwater manipulator joint assembly in accordance with an embodiment.

[0023] FIG. 4d is a schematic drawing of the hydraulic control system in accordance with an embodiment.

[0024] FIG. 4e depicts a hydraulic control system in accordance with an embodiment.

[0025] FIG. 4f depicts the gripping force test setup.

[0026] FIG. 4g depicts the hybrid underwater manipulator joint test setup.

[0027] FIG. 4h is a graphical illustration of Gripping force test results.

[0028] FIG. 4i is a graphical illustration of Joint test results for pitch.

[0029] FIG. 4j is a graphical illustration of Joint test results for roll.

[0030] FIG. 5a depicts an on shore manipulator test and FIG. 5b depicts a pick & place test in a water tank.

[0031] FIG. 6a Underwater platform orientation corresponds to motors; FIG. 6b depicts the proposed omni-directional underwater platform; FIG. 6c depicts the underwater platform mounted with the underwater manipulation system; and FIG. 6d depicts the whole system tested in a water tank.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] The motion of many soft robots are realized by stretching/bending of soft actuators, stretching and bending take place simultaneously most of the time. One concern is that as the soft strain sensors are bound with soft actuators, stretching and bending are measured at the same time as they both have affect on the output signal of soft sensors.

[0033] As described herein, an underwater manipulator actuated by soft origami fluidic actuator with embedded optical waveguide (SOFA) is provided, as shown for example in FIG. 1 to tackle the coupling issue. Three special designed optical soft waveguides are embedded in each soft origami actuator, with photodiodes and LEDs placed on top and bottom for sensory feedback. An underwater manipulator with a gripper is also presented, actuated with the same soft origami actuators. The main contributions of this disclosure include: 1) coupling of stretching and bending are eliminated by combing origami soft actuators and special designed optical waveguide; 2) the optical waveguide is designed such that no cladding is needed which largely reduces fabrication complexity; and 3) a new hybrid underwater manipulator is described, with redundant position feedback for accuracy and dexterous underwater applications.

[0034] Design Concept

[0035] The devices and methods herein provide at least one of three advantages: a) providing a feedback solution for soft actuators for underwater manipulation applications; b) allowing the sensing methodology to measure bending and stretching separately; and c) allowing the sensor to be robust, accurate, and easy to fabricate. For the first advantage, as waterproofing is a critical issue in underwater applications, an optical waveguide is employed, as only the soft waveguide needs to be exposed to water, all the electronics can be separated and well sealed, which largely reduces system design complexity.

[0036] The second advantage is to decouple bending and stretching in two levels: 1) actuator level and 2) sensor level. Firstly, a soft origami actuator shown in FIG. 2a is developed. Contraction and elongation can be easily realized by the unique folding structure. Also, double bidirectional motion can be realized by different combinations of critical angle θc (FIG. 2b). Compared with traditional FEAs, when the proposed soft origami actuator is bent, only the critical angle is changed, stretching of the actuator is negligible (wall thickness <0.7 mm). In this case, bending and stretching are decoupled in the actuator level. Secondly, the optical waveguide is designed such that it can be passed closely to the soft origami actuator. The pre-molded buckling structure also ensures that the optical waveguide can follow the motion of the soft origami actuator. In this case, bending and stretching are decoupled in the sensor level.

[0037] Normally optical waveguide needs at least two layers: one core layer to transmit light and one cladding layer to provide lower refractive index and protection for core layer. This method is very well developed, but the fabrication process is very complex, especially when making soft waveguide. In this case, some modification are made based on the following aspects:

[0038] 1) There is only one layer for the waveguide molded using silicone rubber. The material's refractive index is larger than water (1.33) and water is considered as the cladding layer. In this case, the fabrication process of the optical waveguide can be simplified.

[0039] 2) As shown in FIG. 2b, as the critical angle becomes smaller, the upper and lower surface of the optical waveguide will have more contact area Sc. This area provides a “shortcut” for the light, as the light can propagate straight towards the photodiode. In this case, the smaller the critical angle, the larger the photodiode's output will be.

[0040] Fabrication Process

[0041] The soft origami actuator is shown in FIG. 2a. It is fabricated by injection molding with a wall thickness of 0.7 mm. Each actuator has, for example, three optical waveguide paths and corresponding housing mechanism for mounting the soft waveguides. The bottom side of the actuator is permanently sealed while the top side has a sealing sleeve as inlet & outlet.

[0042] The fabrication process of the soft waveguide is shown in FIG. 2c. A transparent silicone rubber (VytaFlex 20, Smooth-On Inc) (n=1.461) is chosen as the soft waveguide material. The mold is first 3D printed and silicone rubber is injected into the mold. After the silicone is cured, the soft waveguide is removed from the mold and cut into the desired shape. At last, three soft optical waveguides are placed onto the soft origami actuator.

[0043] As shown in FIG. 2d, when the actuator with waveguide is ready, it is first sealed on the sealing sleeve. After that, photodiodes and LEDs are sealed separately in two acrylic tubes. The photodiodes and LEDs are placed perpendicular to the acrylic and the viewing angle of LEDs are 18° to reduce propagation loss. Then two photodiode tube and LED tube are mounted on top and bottom of the actuator.

[0044] Sensing Mechanism Validation

[0045] As described in the last section, the sensing mechanism is based on the contact area of the upper and lower surface of the optical waveguide. In order to justify the feasibility of this approach, a validation test is first carried out.

[0046] As shown in FIG. 3e, a SOFA is mounted at the photodiode side while the LED side can move axially. One optical waveguide is placed as usual, the other waveguide has tinfoil placed in between the upper and lower surface of the waveguide so that there is no “shortcut” when the two surface get closer. The last waveguide path is empty. A laser distance sensor (HG-C1100, Panasonic) is placed at the led side to measure changed length of the actuator. The testing results are shown in FIG. 3b. The photodiode on the empty waveguide path output. The blocked optical waveguide signal had a much smaller magnitude than the normal optical waveguide signal. In this case, one can raw a conclusion that the sensing mechanism is valid.

[0047] SOFA Elongation & Contraction Test

[0048] When the SOFA is elongated & contracted, the length of the actuator can be calculated by any of the three output signals from the three optical waveguide. As shown in FIG. 3a, the equation is:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}H=4L\sin \frac{{\theta }_c}{2}+h_0;& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

θc is the critical angle, H is the length of SOFA, L is the folded edge length and h.sub.0 is the initial length of SOFA. And the changed length

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}\Delta H=4L\sin \frac{{\theta }_c}{2}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

[0049] The testing platform setup was the same as last test except all three optical waveguides were properly mounted. The testing results were shown in FIG. 3f. All the data measured from optical sensors fitted well with laser measured data, the root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.59 mm, 0.56 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.47 mm for sensor1, sensor2, sensor3, and mean value of the three sensors.

[0050] SOFA Bending Test

[0051] The orientation of SOFA can also be decided giving the three critical angles. As shown in FIG. 3a, the three point Pa, Pb, Pc can be described as:

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_a\left(-L\cos {\theta }_{\mathrm{ca}},0,L\sin {\theta }_{\mathrm{ca}}\right);& \left(3\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_b\left(L\cos {\theta }_{\mathrm{cb}}\cos \left(\frac{\pi }{6}\right),-L\cos {\theta }_{\mathrm{cb}}\sin \left(\frac{\pi }{6}\right),L\sin {\theta }_{\mathrm{cb}}\right);& \left(4\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_c\left(L\cos {\theta }_{\mathrm{cc}}\cos \left(\frac{2\pi }{3}\right),L\cos {\theta }_{\mathrm{cc}}\sin \left(\frac{2\pi }{3}\right),L\sin {\theta }_{\mathrm{cc}}\right);\mathrm{and}& \left(5\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{ab}=P_b-P_a;& \left(6\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{bc}=P_c-P_b.& \left(7\right)\end{array}$

The normal vector is

n.sub.a=ab×bc.  (8)

Then the pitch and roll can be calculated as

[00004]$\begin{array}{cc}{\mathrm{pitch}}_a=\arcsin \left(\frac{{\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{n}}_a.Math.\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{x}}{.Math.{\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{n}}_a.Math.}\right);& \left(9\right)\\ {\mathrm{roll}}_a=\arcsin \left(\frac{{\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{n}}_a.Math.\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{y}}{.Math.{\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{n}}_a.Math.}\right).& \left(10\right)\end{array}$

[0052] FIG. 3d showed the testing platform setup. A SOFA was fixed on the LED side and a 6-DOF Inertial measurement unit (IMU) was mounted on top of the photodiode tube. The actuator was rotated manually and data was captured. The testing results was shown in FIG. 3c and FIG. 3g. The RMSE of pitch is 2.2° and the RMSE of roll is 2.63°.

[0053] Manipulator Design and System Setup

[0054] Hybrid design is carried out for the underwater manipulator. On the one hand, giving complex underwater environments, soft robotics have the advantage of inherent compliance compared with conventional rigid-bodied robots. On the other hand, better accuracy and larger payload can be achieved by applying rigid parts in the design. The hybrid underwater manipulator consists of two parts: one gripper and one joint. The gripper (FIG. 4b) is actuated by one SOFA. The SOFA moves axially, the gripper will close when SOFA elongates and vise versa. The maximum opening angle is 78°. The joint has two sections, each section has three SOFAs mounted triangularly. Two photodiode circuits are sealed inside the middle acrylic tube and two LED circuits are sealed in two tubes mounted on top and bottom of the joint. The diameter of the joint is 108 mm and the height is 114 mm.

[0055] The underwater manipulator was controlled by the hydraulic control system shown in FIG. 4d and FIG. 4e. The hydraulic system consists of eight valves, two pumps, and one control unit. For the sake of waterproofing and compactness, all the electronic components are put into acrylic tubes. Six actuators on the joint correspond to six valves, and each valve is connected with two coupled actuators. The rest two valves are for the actuator on the gripper.

[0056] Gripping Force & Joint Test

[0057] The gripper's gripping force was first tested. The testing setup is shown in FIG. 4g. A force sensor (FSR400, Interlink Electronics) was mounted at the tip of the gripper. As shown in FIG. 4h, the gripping force reached about 2.3 N when pressure was 30 kPa.

[0058] As illustrated in the last section, giving three critical angle, the orientation of one SOFA can be calculated. In the manipulator's joint, the normal vector of each section is in parallel with the corresponding SOFA. In other words, one section's orientation can be obtained by only one of the three SOFAs. The redundant sensing feedback could largely increase system robustness and accuracy. In order to validate the position feedback, an IMU was mounted on the top photodiode tube and used as a reference (FIG. 4f). The testing results were shown in FIG. 4i and FIG. 4j. The RMSE of pitch was 1.34° and the RMSE of roll is 5.1°.

[0059] Hybrid Underwater Manipulator Validation

[0060] A serious of tests were carried out to test the hybrid underwater manipulator's performance. The hybrid underwater manipulator was first mounted on a fixed platform and perform different tasks both on shore and underwater. In the on shore test (FIG. 5a), the manipulator was mounted vertically and was controlled to grab a pen from one operator, rotate count clockwise and return the pen to the operator. In the water tank test (FIG. 5b), the manipulator was controlled to perform one pick-and-place task of a cylindrical object.

[0061] Omni-Directional Underwater Platform

[0062] The underwater platform (FIG. 6b) is controller by 7 motors and is capable of moving omni-directionally. Compared with most existing underwater platforms that use cubic frame, triangular motion frames are used for the underwater platform, in which case the overall weight can be reduced while thrust force and load capacity can remain the same. In total 7 motors were used to control 6 DOFs (FIG. 6a): Three horizontal motors provide propulsion alone x axis and y axis; three vertical motors provide propulsion alone z axis, pitch and roll; the last motor mounted on the center provide yaw.

[0063] Validation Test of the Integrated Underwater Platform

[0064] The manipulator system was mounted on an underwater platform and tested in a water tank. As shown in FIG. 6c, the manipulator was mounted underneath the underwater platform. The connecting bar was 50 cm to prevent interference between the manipulator and the platform. Neutral buoyancy can be obtained by applying weights alone the triangle frame and validation test was carried out in a water tank (FIG. 6d).

[0065] A hybrid underwater manipulator, along with soft origami actuator and embedded optical waveguide was proposed in this paper. Taking advantage of the distinct structure of the soft origami actuator, bending and stretching motion was firstly separated on the actuator level. Also, as the pattern of embedded optical waveguide made it closely attach to the soft origami actuator's surface, bending and stretching were further decoupled on the sensor level. The new novel optical sensing approach requires only one core layer for waveguide, largely reduces fabrication complexity and cost. The feasibility of this approach was also validated. The soft origami fluidic actuator with embedded optical waveguide SOFA was tested as a single unit and components of one joint and the results showed small RMSE. At last, the hybrid underwater manipulator successfully carried different tasks on shore, in a water tank, and on an underwater platform.

[0066] Unless otherwise indicated in the examples and elsewhere in the specification and claims, all parts and percentages are by weight, all temperatures are in degrees Centigrade, and pressure is at or near atmospheric pressure.

[0067] With respect to any figure or numerical range for a given characteristic, a figure or a parameter from one range may be combined with another figure or a parameter from a different range for the same characteristic to generate a numerical range.

[0068] Other than in the operating examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers, values and/or expressions referring to quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, etc., used in the specification and claims are to be understood as modified in all instances by the term “about.”

[0069] While the invention is explained in relation to certain embodiments, it is to be understood that various modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention disclosed herein is intended to cover such modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.