METHOD OF AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A PROCESS OF CIRCULATION OF SOLID MATERIAL IN A CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR
20250314379 · 2025-10-09
Inventors
Cpc classification
F23C2206/103
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23N2223/40
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23C2206/102
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23C10/32
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of monitoring circulation of solid material in a circulating fluidized bed reactor including a reaction chamber, at least one solid material separator, and a return path between the separator and the chamber. The method includes selecting process variables of the process of circulating of solid material in the return path, and selecting performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material amongst the selected process variables for each performance indicator of the process of circulation of material, creating a multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of the process variables and the performance indicators, determining a modelled value of the performance indicators, by applying current measured values of the process variables to the multivariate model, and comparing the modelled value of each performance indicator to a respective measured value and inspecting a presence of an anomaly between the modelled value and the respective measured value.
Claims
1.-21. (canceled)
22. A method of monitoring a process of circulation of solid material in a circulating fluidized bed reactor, the reactor comprising a reaction chamber, at least one solid material separator, a return path between the at least one solid material separator and the reaction chamber and, in which method, the process of circulation of the solid material comprises arranging solid material to be entrained by gas flow in the reaction chamber, and to entrain further from the reaction chamber to the at least one solid material separator and passing solid material from the solid material separator via a return path to the reaction chamber, the method comprising the following steps: (a) selecting process variables of the process of circulation of the solid material in the return path, and selecting performance indicators of the process of circulation of the solid material amongst the selected process variables for each performance indicator of the process of circulation of the solid material; (b) creating a multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of the process variables and the performance indicators of the process of circulation of the solid material; (c) determining a modelled value of the performance indicators, by applying current measured values of the process variables to the multivariate model; and (d) comparing the modelled value of each performance indicator to a respective measured value of each performance indicator and inspecting a presence of an anomaly between the modelled value and the respective measured value.
23. A method according to claim 22, wherein the multivariate model is updated after a period of time triggered by a lapse of a constant predetermined time interval, or by a trigger input.
24. A method according to claim 22, wherein, when the reactor comprises at least a first return path between a first solid material separator and the reaction chamber and a second return path between a second solid material separator and the reaction chamber, the method further comprises separately performing the method concerning the process of circulation of the solid material in the first return path and the method concerning the process of circulation of the solid material in the second return path.
25. A method according to claim 22, wherein the multivariate model is a multivariate linear regression having a first number (N) of measured observations of each process variable and a second number (P) of different process variables of the process of circulation of solid material as follows:
26. A method according to claim 25, wherein the first number of measured observations N is at least ten times the second number (P) of different process variables.
27. A method according to claim 22, wherein a risk index for each performance indicator is calculated using information of a presence of the anomaly.
28. A method according to claim 27, wherein calculating the risk index for each performance indicator uses an anomaly between the modelled value and the respective measured value.
29. A method according to claim 22, wherein the process of circulation of the solid material comprises passing the solid material from the solid material separator directly to the reaction chamber via a loop seal in the return path, and further comprising selecting: (i) a pressure difference of the loop seal in the return path of the circulation of the solid material; and (ii) a temperature in the loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material, as the performance indicators of the process in step (a).
30. A method according to claim 29, wherein: (iii) process variables of the performance indicator of the pressure difference of the loop seal in the return path comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, temperature of a product gas upstream the loop seal, and bed temperature in the reaction chamber, and (iv) process variables of the performance indicator of temperature in the loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, a temperature of product gas upstream of the loop seal, and a bed temperature in the reaction chamber.
31. A method according to claim 30, wherein the aggregate reaction gas flow rate is total flow rate of gas flows into the reaction chamber.
32. A method according to claim 30, wherein the bed temperature is an average bed temperature in the reaction chamber, which is calculated from at least two measurement points in the reaction chamber, at least one of which is at a grid level of the reaction chamber.
33. A method according to claim 22, wherein the process of circulation of the solid material comprises passing the solid material from the solid material separator via a fluidized bed heat exchanger to the reaction chamber, and further comprising selecting: (i) a pressure difference of a loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material; (ii) a temperature in the loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material; (iii) a pressure difference of the fluidized bed heat exchanger; and (iv) a temperature of the solid material downstream of a fluidized bed heat exchange unit in the fluidized bed heat exchanger, as the performance indicators of the process in step (a).
34. A method according to claim 33, wherein: (v) process variables of the performance indicator of a pressure difference of the loop seal in the return path comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, a temperature of a product gas upstream the loop seal, and a bed temperature in the reaction chamber, (vi) process variables of the performance indicator of a temperature in the loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, a temperature of a product gas upstream of the loop seal, and a bed temperature in the reaction chamber, (vii) process variables of the performance indicator of a pressure difference of the fluidized bed heat exchanger comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, a temperature in the loop seal in the return path in the circulation of the solid material, a pressure difference of the loop seal, a gas flow rate to the fluidized bed heat exchanger, and a bed temperature in the reaction chamber, and (viii) process variables of the performance indicator of the temperature of the fluidized bed heat exchanger comprise an aggregate reaction gas flow rate fed into the reactor, a temperature in the loop seal in the return path, a pressure difference of the loop seal, a gas flow rate to the fluidized bed heat exchanger, and a bed temperature in the reaction chamber.
35. A method according to claim 34, wherein the aggregate reaction gas flow rate is a total flow rate of gas flows into the reaction chamber.
36. A method according to claim 34, wherein the bed temperature is an average bed temperature in the reaction chamber, which is calculated from at least two measurement points in the reaction chamber, at least one of which is at a grid level of the reaction chamber.
37. A method according to claim 22, wherein creating the multivariate model comprises: measuring values of predetermined process variables, storing the measured values of the predetermined process variables with a time stamp, thus, forming the history data of the process variables; measuring values of the performance indicator and storing the measured values of the performance indicator with a time stamp, thus, forming the history data of performance indicators; and selecting valid history data using predetermined data filters.
38. A method according to claim 37, wherein the data filters are configured to approve data that is not older than two months.
39. A method according to claim 37, wherein the data filters are configured to filter out from history data at least any data from shut down situations and from any abnormal operation, based on predefined limits for input variables or external information of abnormal operation.
40. A method according to claim 37, wherein the data filters are configured to approve data that is older than a pre-set quarantine time.
41. A method according to claim 40, wherein the data filters are configured to approve data that is older than two weeks.
42. A control system for monitoring a process of circulation of solid material in a circulating fluidized bed reactor between a reaction chamber and at least one solid material separator, and to the reaction chamber via a return path comprising a loop seal, the control system comprising: a performance modelling unit comprising: (a) access to source history data of performance indicators of the process of circulation of the solid material in the return path and process variables for each performance indicator; (b) a multivariate model for each performance indicator; and (c) executable instructions which, when executed in the control system, update the multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of predetermined process variables and the performance indicators of the process of circulation of the solid material, resulting in a calibrated multivariate model; and a performance diagnostic module comprising: (a) inputs for receiving measurement data of process variables and performance indicators of the process of circulation of the solid material; and (b) executable instructions which, when executed in the control system, (i) determine a modelled value of the performance indicators, by applying current measured values of the process variables to the calibrated multivariate model; and (ii) compare the modelled value of each performance indicator to a measured respective value of the performance indicator and inspecting a presence of an anomaly between the modelled value and the measured respective value.
43. A control system according to claim 42, further comprising measurement sensors for at least the following process variables: pressure sensors for measuring a pressure drop in the loop seal; a product gas temperature sensor downstream of the solid material separator; and sensors for determining an aggregate gas flow rate to the reactor and bed temperature in the reaction chamber of the reactor.
44. A control system according to claim 42, further comprising: a fluidized bed heat exchanger in the return path; measurement sensors for at least following process variables: pressure sensors for measuring a pressure drop in the loop seal; a temperature sensor in the loop seal; a product gas temperature sensor downstream of the solid material separator; pressure sensors for measuring a pressure drop in the fluidized bed heat exchanger; temperature sensors for measuring temperature of solid material downstream of a heat exchange unit in the fluidized bed heat exchanger; and sensors for determining an aggregate gas flow rate to the reactor and bed temperature in the reaction chamber of the reactor.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0160] In the following, the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying exemplary, schematic drawings, in which:
[0161]
[0162]
[0163]
[0164]
[0165]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0166] In the following, the description of the figures generally relates to examples of method of air combustion of fuel in a CFB reactor. Even if some minor structural changes may be needed, the CFB reactor and its embodiments described in the figures are as well applicable for producing syngas by practicing a gasification process in the reactor. Correspondingly the described CFB reactor and its embodiments may be utilized for practicing a so called oxy-combustion process, meaning combustion with oxygen enriched gas, which may contain air and/or recycled product gas.
[0167]
[0168] The wind box 18, and also other air inlets, are in connection with a source of air 24. This is an example of an air operated CFB boiler. There is at least one inlet 22 for fuel in connection with the combustion chamber 12. Operation of the CFB boiler involves a process of circulation of solid material, which, in this connection may also be referred to as bed material, as well. Bed material may comprise sand, limestone, and/or clay, that in particular may comprise kaolin, and also unburned fuel. Due to the bed material inside the boiler, CFB boilers have high heat transfer coefficients and a substantially uniform temperature distribution and have a considerably low stable combustion temperature. Combustion of fuel in the circulating fluidized bed results in heating, evaporating the water in the water-steam circuit, and superheating the steam, which can be used in a manner known as such, for example, production of electric power in a steam turbine generator. The steam cycle is not described here in more detailed.
[0169] It is a characteristic of the CFB boiler that, during its operation, a process of circulation of solid material is maintained via a route formed by the combustion chamber, a separator, and a solids return path. Combustion of fuel in the CFB results in high-efficiency combustion of various solid fuels with low emissions, even when burning fuels with completely different calorific values at the same time. Due to fluidization, there is an internal movement of solid material inside the combustion chamber 12, generally, upwards at the mid-section of the chamber and downwards flow of solids near the walls, as is depicted by the arrows in
[0170] The solid material, which is transported by the product gases to the separator 14 is separated from the gas as, is depicted by the arrow in the figure. The second outlet 30, which may also be referred to as a particle outlet, is connected to a lower part of the combustion chamber 12 by the return path 15 for returning separated solid material back to the combustion chamber 12. The return path 15 is provided with a so called loop seal 32 that prevents back-flow from the combustion chamber 12 to the particle outlet and makes it possible to feed separated solid material controllably back to the combustion chamber 12. The loop seal may also be referred to as a gas seal. Operation of the loop seal is controlled by fluidization air, which can be controllably supplied through an air inlet 23. Thus, the circulation of the solid material comprises the flow of solid material from the combustion chamber 12 to the solid material separator 14 and from the solid material separator 14 via the return path 15 and the loop seal 32, back to the combustion chamber 12. The process of circulation of the solid material is maintained and controlled while the CFB boiler is operating. The general direction of movement of the solid material may be used for referring to positions in the CFB boiler, which direction becomes clear in the description above.
[0171] In CFB boilers, the solid material circulation may be divided in two categories: internal circulating material flow that means solids material circulating inside the combustion chamber (12), which are depicted schematically with upside-down U-shaped arrows in
[0172] In order to monitor the process of circulation of the solid material, the CFB boiler 10 comprises a plurality of sensors for obtaining online data of performance indicators and process variables. The online data becomes history data when stored after the time moment of measurement. There are at least following sensorsand point of measurementsarranged to the CFB boiler for practicing the method according to the invention: [0173] (i) a first pressure sensor 101 arranged upstream of the loop seal 32, but downstream of the solid material separator, i.e., between the loop seal and the solid material separator 14; [0174] (ii) a second pressure sensor 102 arranged downstream of the loop seal 32, between the loop seal 32 and the combustion chamber 12, the purpose of the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor being to determine pressure difference provided by the loop seal 32; [0175] (iii) a first temperature sensor 100 arranged in the loop seal 32; [0176] (iv) a second temperature sensor 103 arranged upstream of the loop seal 32 it being shown in
[0180] Additionally, there may be an air flow rate sensor 109 for measuring the air flow rate to the loop seal, which may optionally the included in the aggregate air flow rate, as is depicted in
[0181] The CFB boiler further comprises a control system 48 for handing numerical operations relating to control of the CFB boiler and, particularly, to monitor the process of circulation of solid material in the CFB boiler. It should be understood that
[0182]
[0183] The control system 48 participates in practicing a method of monitoring a process of circulation of solid material in the circulating fluidized bed boiler 10. The control system 48 comprises one or more computers and executable instructions, i.e., computer programs which, when executed in the control system 48 perform the method in the circulating fluidized bed boiler 10. The method comprises: [0184] (a.) selecting performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material and process variables for each performance indicator of the process of circulation of solid material; [0185] (b.) calibrating a multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of the process variables and the performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material; [0186] (c.) determining a modelled value of the performance indicators, by applying current measured values of the process variables to the multivariate model; and [0187] (d.) comparing the modelled value of each performance indicator to a respective measured value of each performance indicator and inspecting presence of an anomaly between the modelled value and the measured value.
[0188] The control system comprises a performance modelling unit 400. The modelling unit 400 comprises executable instructions which, when executed in the control system 48, calibrate the multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of predetermined process variables and the performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material, resulting in a calibrated multivariate model.
[0189] The performance modelling unit 400 has, or is provided with an access, such as a data transfer communication with a source of history data 401 of (a) performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material obtained from the CFB boiler, and (b) process variables for each performance indicator. The history data is stored in a data media, which is used as the source of history data 401, is obtained by measuring the values of predetermined process variables 101, 102, 103, . . . , and 109 (see
[0190] Advantageously, the filtering process 406 may comprise the following conditions or rules. Firstly, a quarantine time for measured data is set so that only the data that is older than a pre-set quarantine time is approved. The quarantine time depends on the case. In some practical applications, the quarantine time may be even as short as three to seven days. However, preferably, the quarantine time is seven to fourteen days, even more preferably, at least two weeks. Additionally, it is preferred to filter out data that may be obsolete due to being too old and, therefore, the predetermined data filter is configured to approve data, which is not older than a predetermined time, advantageously, not older than two months. Also, the filter unit is configured to filter out from history data any data from shut down situations and/or data originating from any abnormal operation condition, e.g., based on predefined limits for input variables or an external information setting the data to be unusable or data of abnormal operation.
[0191] This way, the model is based on history data that represents normal operation conditions. The history data relating to the CFB boiler shown for example in
[0196] The performance indicators represent factors that describe the state of the process of circulation of solid material. In that case of the embodiment shown in
[0199] The data in the source of history data 401 is used as an input for the modelling unit 400, which is configured to prepare and/or to calibrate a multivariate model assigned separately for each performance indicator, in this case, for two performance indicators. The performance modelling unit 400 thus provides the multivariate model for each performance indicator. The calibration may be repeated at predefined intervals, or periodically. This helps to keep the model actual, reflecting the possible changes caused by normal use of the CFB boiler, but also, to changes in fuel quality, the environmental conditions (temperature, ambient humidity, ambient pressure changes), which may lead to operation parameters changing over time. The calibration may be prevented upon detecting an anomaly in the process. In this manner, it may be ensured that a problem in bed material circulation that is just developing will not contaminate the calibration and the model.
[0200] The model can be constructed by the modelling unit 400 using a multivariate linear regression. In principle, past input values of the model (i.e., history data of measurements) are used for estimating the coefficients of the model. The model is then used to estimate the prevailing situation by making use of current online data and the estimated coefficients.
[0201] For example, in linear regression, the response variable is expected to be a linear combination of process variables. Multiple linear regression can be used to model the relationship between multiple process variables and a performance indicator by fitting a linear equation to history data.
[0202] In a case of the embodiment shown in
[0210] In the case of the embodiment shown in
[0218] The fitting is performed by minimizing the sum of the squares of the vertical deviations from each data point to the line that fits best for the observed data, that is the optimal coefficient values by minimizing the sum of squared errors.
[0219] The modelling unit 400 provides required coefficients of the model that are based on viable history data, to be used for modelling the performance indicators by applying online data of process variable to the model. While the control system 48 and the CFB boiler 10 are in operation, the history data comprising data of process variables and the performance indicators is continuously read and stored to the source of history data 401. The modelling unit 400 is configured to update or to calibrate the model, i.e., the coefficients of the model in order to learn the model the latest conditions of normal operation of the process of circulation of solid material.
[0220] There is also a performance diagnostic module 404 provided in the control system 48. The performance diagnostic module is configured to receive current online data by a source of current data 402 from the CFB boiler of the performance indicators, and the process variables and a newly calibrated model of the performance indicators from the modelling unit 400. The performance diagnostic module 404 comprises instructions to determine a modelled value of the performance indicators by applying current measured values of the process variables to the calibrated multivariate model. Additionally, the performance diagnostic module 404 is configured to compare the modelled value of each performance indicator to a measured respective value of performance indicator and inspecting a presence of an anomaly between the modelled value and the measured value. Based on the outcome of the comparison, a predetermined measure or measures can be taken and generated as a diagnostic output 408.
[0221] The presence of an anomaly and the need for remedial actions can be realized by estimating a risk index of each KPI. The performance diagnostic module 404 may comprise instructions to practice a method estimating the risk index for a performance indicator, which performs the following acts: [0222] current data of performance indicators (KPI) of circulation of solid material is measured; based on the current data of the boiler, at least one of the following: [0223] (i) an average of the performance indicators is computed; [0224] (ii) a standard deviation of measured performance indicators is computed; [0225] (iii) a difference between a maximum measured performance indicator value and a minimum measured performance indicator is computed; and [0226] (iv) a difference between an average performance indicator KPI and a measured performance indicators is computed; [0227] using the computation results from (i), (ii), (iii) and/or (iv), preparing a risk index for the performance indicator KPI. The computation results from (i), (ii), (iii) and/or (iv) are compared with corresponding predefined limits so as to get risk indexes for average, a standard deviation, a difference between a maximum and a minimum KPI, and a difference between an average KPI and measured KPIs. In computation of deviation of a KPI.sub.k from an average KPI, the average includes all KPI measurements, except the measurement of KPI.sub.k.
[0228] Preferably, in the method also, or alternatively, [0229] (v) modelled values of KPI.sub.k; k=1, . . . , K are computed, and residuals between the measured values of the performance indicators and the modelled values of the performance indicators are computed. The results from step (v) are advantageously also used in the preparing of the risk index, preferably, such that residuals are compared with a corresponding predefined limit so as to get a sintering risk index for KPI residuals.
[0230] The final risk index may then be the maximum of the above risk indexes, for example. In this manner, the predictive accuracy of bed sintering index can be still improved.
[0231] The present inventors have observed that, in this manner, the resulting risk index provides an indication of a condition in the process of circulation of solid material in a circulating fluidized bed boiler, that could lead to shutting down the boiler unless treated, early enough to take corrective actions, such that the need to shut down the boiler may be avoided.
[0232] Optionally, the control system comprises a storage of history coefficients of the model 410, where each calibrated model is stored. The performance diagnostic module 404 may comprise a model evaluation function, which checks the newly created model and in case a newly created model is found to be imperfect, a model from the storage of history coefficients of the model 410 is used until an intact fresh model can be provided.
[0233]
[0234] The fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 is arranged to the return path 15 downstream of the loop seal 32 in the return channel 16. Solid material flows through the loop seal 32 into the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 where a bubbling bed of solid material is formed by introducing fluidization air into the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 through a grid 52 at the bottom thereof. The fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 is provided with a lifting chamber 54 with a respective inlet 54 of transport air. The lifting chamber transfers the solid material from the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 back to the combustion chamber 12 via a return duct 55.
[0235] The fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 is provided with one or more heat exchange units 58, which are preferably connected to, for example, the steam cycle. The heat exchange units may be evaporators, steam superheaters and/or steam reheaters. The heat exchange units comprise a heat transfer surface, such as one or more tube bundles inside the bubbling bed of solid material forming the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50.
[0236] In the CFB boiler, the solid material which is transported by the product gases to the separator 14, is separated from the gas as is depicted by the arrow in the figure. The second outlet 30, which may also be referred to as a particle outlet of the separator 14, is connected to a lower part of the combustion chamber 12 by the return path 15 for returning separated solid material back to the combustion chamber 12. The return path 15 is provided with a so called loop seal 32, which prevents back-flow from the combustion chamber 12 to the particle outlet and makes it possible to feed separated solid material controllably forward in the return path 15. Operation of the loop seal is controlled by fluidization air, which can be controllably supplied through an air inlet 23. Thus, the circulation of solid material comprises the flow of solid material from the combustion chamber 12 to the solid material separator 14 and from the solid material separator 14 via the return channel 16 to the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50, and from the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 back to the combustion chamber 12. While the fluidized bed heat exchanger 50 is operated, heat is transferred from the solid material to the steam flowing in the heat exchange unit 58, this cooling the solid material prior to its introduction back to the combustion chamber 12.
[0237] In order to monitor the process of circulation of solid material, the CFB boiler 10, according to the embodiment of
[0248] The control system 48 described in
[0249] When applied to the CFB boiler according to
[0254] The control system comprises a performance modelling unit 400. The modelling unit 400 comprises executable instructions which, when executed in the control system 48, calibrate the multivariate model for each performance indicator, using history data of predetermined process variables and the performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material, resulting in a calibrated multivariate model.
[0255] The performance modelling unit 400 has, or is provided with an access, such as a data transfer communication with a source of history data 401 of (a) performance indicators of the process of circulation of solid material obtained from the CFB boiler, and (b) process variables for each performance indicator. The history data is stored in a data media, which is used as the source of history data 401, is obtained by measuring the values of predetermined process variables 101, 102, 103, . . . , and 114 (see
[0256] The history data relating to the CFB boiler shown in
[0267] The performance indicators represent factors that describe the state of the process of circulation of solid material and the fluidized bed heat exchanger. In case of the embodiment shown in
[0272] The data in the source of history data 401 is used as an input for the modelling unit 400, which is configured to prepare and/or to calibrate a multivariate model assigned separately for each performance indicator, in this case, for two performance indicators. The performance modelling unit 400 thus provides the multivariate model for each performance indicator. The calibration may be repeated at predefined intervals, or periodically. This helps to keep the model actual, reflecting the possible changes caused by normal use of the CFB boiler, but also, to changes in fuel quality, the environmental conditions (temperature, ambient humidity, ambient pressure changes), which may lead to operation parameters changing over time. The calibration may be prevented upon detecting an anomaly in the process. In this manner, it may be ensured that a problem in bed material circulation that is just developing will not contaminate the calibration and the model.
[0273] The model can be constructed by the modelling unit 400 using a multivariate linear regression. In principle, past input values of the model (i.e., history data of measurements) are used for estimating the coefficients of the model. The model is then used to estimate the prevailing situation by making use of current online data and the estimated coefficients.
[0274] For example, in linear regression, the response variable is expected to be a linear combination of process variables. Multiple linear regression can be used to model the relationship between multiple process variables and performance indicator by fitting a linear equation to history data.
[0275] In the case of the embodiment shown in
[0285] In the case of the embodiment shown in
[0295] The fitting is performed by minimizing the sum of the squares of the vertical deviations from each data point to the line that fits best for the observed data, that is the optimal coefficient values by minimizing the sum of squared errors.
[0296] The modelling unit 400 provides required coefficients of the model that are based on viable history data to be used for modelling the performance indicators by applying online data of process variable to the model. While the control system 48 and the CFB boiler 10 are in operation, the history data comprising data of process variables and the performance indicators is continuously read and stored to the source of history data 401. The modelling unit 400 is configured to update or to calibrate the model, i.e., the coefficients of the model, in order to learn the model the latest conditions of normal operation of the process of circulation of the solid material.
[0297] There is also a performance diagnostic module 404 provided in the control system 48 that is applicable to the CFB boiler also provided with one or more fluidized bed heat exchangers. The description or the performance diagnostic module in connection with
[0298]
[0299]
[0300] It is to also to be understood that the return path 15 shown in
[0301] In addition, or alternatively to having the by-pass path 56, in
[0302] The control system 48 described in the
[0303] An exemplary embodiment of calculation of residual-based KPIs and the risk index for a case wherein a circulating fluidized bed boiler 10 has at one of its return paths 15 provided with a fluidized bed heat exchanger 50. The following steps are taken: [0304] creating the KPI models based on pressure difference and temperature in loop seal and pressure difference and temperature in the fluidized bed heat exchange chamber; [0305] comparing the modelled values of the KPI's to measured values at the current point of time (t), for example, KPI for a modelled loop seal temperature can be computed as follows:
[0311] The residual limits for each KPI type are shown schematically in below table:
TABLE-US-00001 lower limit upper limit KPI (l.sub.lo, k) (l.sub.up, k) Residuals of pressure difference (loop A.sub.lo A.sub.up seal) Residuals of temperature (loop seal) B.sub.lo B.sub.up Residuals of temperature (fluidized bed C.sub.lo C.sub.up heat exchange chamber bottom down- stream each heat exchange unit) Residuals of pressure difference (in the D.sub.lo D.sub.up fluidized bed heat exchange chamber) [0312] wherein A, B, C, and D depict predefined limit values. [0313] Calculating the risk index for each KPIs as follows:
[0317] As an example, let us assume that a residual for temperature in the loop seal is KPI.sub.loop seal temp,res(t)=KPI.sub.loop seal temp,modelled(t)KPI.sub.loop seal temp,meas (t)=B.sub.up. Then, using the above formula, we get for the loop seal temperature risk index:
In the case B.sub.up=B and B.sub.lo=B, then r.sub.loop seal temp=100 and, thus, calculation of the overall risk index with above formula results in RI=max(r.sub.k)=100.
[0318] The case without the fluidized bed heat exchange chamber goes similarly than the above example, but omitting the values (KPIs) related to the fluidized bed heat exchange chamber.
[0319] According to an aspect of the invention, the overall risk index may be calculated using at least one of the following formulas: as maximum RI=max(r.sub.k), average RI=mean(r.sub.k), weighted average RI=Wmean(r.sub.k) or median RI=median(r.sub.k).
[0320] According to a preferable aspect of the invention, a risk index for each of the KPIs is limited to have a maximum value of one hundred and a lowest value of zero, i.e., r.sub.k=[0, . . . , 100]. So, if an absolute value of KPI.sub.k is greater than an absolute value of a lower limit (l.sub.lo,k) or upper limit (l.sub.up,k), then r.sub.k=100. Generally, if KPI.sub.k does not belong to the interval [l.sub.lo,k, l.sub.up,k], then r.sub.k=100. It is also possible to have a condition written as if 100(|KPI.sub.k(t)(l.sub.up,k+l.sub.lo,k)/2|)/((l.sub.up,kl.sub.lo,k)/2)>100, then r.sub.k=100 and else r.sub.k=100(KPI.sub.k(t)(l.sub.up,k+l.sub.lo,k)/2|)/((l.sub.up,kl.sub.lo,k)/2).
[0321] In the above example, the table indicates that absolute limit values may be equal. It is possible, however, that upper limits and lower limits may be defined differently, so that the absolute values of the upper and lower limits differ for the corresponding KPI. It should be noted, however, that l.sub.lo,k<l.sub.up,k.
[0322] The above-described example is made for clarifying purposes only and not meant to limit the scope of the claimed invention. Furthermore, instead of residuals, other mathematical comparisons are possible, for example, computing a ratio between corresponding values.
[0323] While the invention has been described herein by way of examples in connection with what are, at present, considered to be the most preferred embodiments, it is obvious to the skilled person that, along with the technical progress, the basic idea of the invention can be implemented in many ways. The details mentioned in connection with any embodiment above may be used in connection with another embodiment when such a combination is technically feasible.