Test device and calibrating method

Abstract

A test device and a calibration method thereof are disclosed. The test device for calibrating a test equipment, which is used to test a waterproof level of an electronic apparatus, comprises: two plates, which are pressed against each other with pressure, wherein minor gap between the two plates are used as water leakage path.

Claims

1. A method for calibrating a test equipment under calibration, which is used to test a waterproof level of an electronic apparatus, the method comprising: testing a test device by using a standard test equipment to obtain a standard waterproof level value using a first sensor, wherein the test device comprises two plates which are pressed against each other with pressure, and is placed in a test position of a base of the standard test equipment when calibrating the standard test equipment, and wherein a minor gap between the two plates is used as a water leakage path; testing the same test device by using the test equipment under calibration to obtain a calibration waterproof level value using a second sensor, wherein the test device is placed in the test position of the base of the test equipment under calibration when calibrating the test equipment under calibration; and calibrating the test equipment under calibration by using the difference between the standard waterproof level value and the calibration waterproof level value.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: performing the testing and calibrating processes by using the test device with at least one changed attribute selected from a group including the roughness of surfaces between the two plates, the pressure applied on the two plates the length along the leakage path.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description thereof, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a test device according to a first embodiment of this disclosure.

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a test device according to a second embodiment of this disclosure.

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a test device according to a third embodiment of this disclosure.

(5) FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing a test device according to a fourth embodiment of this disclosure.

(6) FIG. 5 is an exemplary flow chart diagram a method for calibrating a test equipment under calibration according to an embodiment of this disclosure.

(7) FIG. 6 shows an example of testing an test device in a test equipment.

(8) FIG. 7 shows the cross-section view along the line A-A′ of FIG. 7.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(9) Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings. It should be noted that the relative arrangement of the components and steps, the numerical expressions, and numerical values set forth in these embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention unless it is specifically stated otherwise.

(10) The following description of at least one exemplary embodiment is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.

(11) Techniques, methods and apparatus as known by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art may not be discussed in detail but are intended to be part of the specification where appropriate.

(12) In all of the examples illustrated and discussed herein, any specific values should be interpreted to be illustrative only and non-limiting. Thus, other examples of the exemplary embodiments could have different values.

(13) Notice that similar reference numerals and letters refer to similar items in the following figures, and thus once an item is defined in one figure, it is possible that it need not be further discussed for following figures.

(14) In order to test the waterproof ability of an electronic apparatus, the electronic apparatus may be placed in an environment with high water pressure. The electronic apparatus may be a smart phone, a smart watch or a transducer such as a microphone unit. For example, this may simulate the situation where a smart watch is placed at 50 meters under water. Generally, a test equipment is used to test the electronic apparatus by sensing the leakage thereof.

(15) If a new test equipment is to be used or is developed, its scales may deviate from a standard one. So, we propose that the test equipment under development or supplied by a different vendor shall be calibrated with the standard one.

(16) In the calibration, a standard test device is tested in the standard equipment and a standard leakage value is obtained. Then, the standard test device is tested in the test equipment under calibration and a calibration leakage value is obtained. Ideally, the calibration leakage value should be identical with the standard one. But, in practice, they will have difference. The difference is used to adjust the test equipment under calibration to approach the scales or values of the standard one.

(17) The test device is a key issue for calibrating the test equipment. If a product to be tested is used as the test device, it has several disadvantages. First, the cost may be an issue. Second, its performance may vary. For example, after being tested in a high water pressure, the mesh of the product may be changed (enlarged), which leads to an un-constant result. Third, it is usually difficult to adjust the water leakage of a product and thus it is difficult to calibrate the test equipment under calibration in several levels by using the same product.

(18) Here, we propose that they shall be calibrated before being used. The test device for calibration is proposed here, which can create a very small leakage which is controllable and durable and which is cost efficient and simple to manufacture.

(19) FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a test device according to a first embodiment of this disclosure.

(20) As shown in FIG. 1, the test device comprises two plates 11, 12. The two plates 11, 12 are pressed against each other with pressure indicated by P1, P2. Here, minor gap between the two plates 11, 12 are used as water leakage path 13.

(21) The pressure P1, P2 can be applied by using clamps or bolts. FIG. 2 shows an embodiment in which the plates 11, 12 are pressed by using bolts. As shown in FIG. 2, the bolts 21, 24 and the nuts 22, 23, 25, 26 are used to apply pressure on the plates 11, 12. For example, the waterproof level of the test device adjusted by changing the pressure P1, P2 applied on the two plates 11, 12.

(22) The test device can be used for calibrating a test equipment. As explained above, the test equipment is used to test a waterproof level of an electronic apparatus. The waterproof level may be a value indicating the range of the water leakage value of a device or may be a water leakage value per se.

(23) The plates 11, 12 may be metal plates, such as aluminum plates. Alternatively, it may be resin sheet.

(24) FIGS. 3-4 show several embodiments of changed water leakages of the test device. The repetitive description of already explained elements is omitted.

(25) The waterproof level of the test device is adjusted by changing the roughness of surfaces between the two plates. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, a layer of waterproof mesh 31 may be sandwiched between two adjacent plates, and the roughness of surfaces is at least partly defined by the layer of waterproof mesh. For example, it can be defined by the thickness, the material and/or the surface roughness of the waterproof mesh. The waterproof mesh may be that available on the market, which is waterproof and is used to protect an device from water or humidity.

(26) The waterproof level of the test device adjusted by changing the length along the leakage path. As shown in FIG. 4, the plates 41, 42 are shorter than those in FIG. 1. So, the length of the leakage path 43 is shorter than that in FIG. 1, too.

(27) In this disclosure, the test device is simple and easy to manufacture. It can provide a stable performance during test. The water leakage thereof can be adjusted conveniently.

(28) FIG. 5 is an exemplary flow chart diagram a method for calibrating a test equipment under calibration according to an embodiment of this disclosure. The test equipment under calibration is used to test a waterproof level of an electronic apparatus.

(29) As shown in FIG. 5, at step S1100, a test device as described above is test by using a standard test equipment to obtain a standard waterproof level value.

(30) FIG. 6 shows an example of testing an test device in a test equipment. FIG. 7 shows the cross-section view along the line A-A′ of FIG. 6. The arrangement of the standard test equipment may be that shown in FIGS. 6, 7.

(31) As shown in FIG. 6, the test device may be placed in the test positions 61, 62, 63, 64 of a base 66 of the standard test equipment. A plurality of test devices may be used in the testing. The base 66 may include a water outlet 65, which can be used to control the water pressure of testing.

(32) As shown in FIG. 7, the test devices are placed in the test positions 61, 63 with inlets towards down and outlets towards up. The pressurized water comes along the direction indicated by the arrow. A sensor (not shown) is provided above the test devices to sensor the water leakage or humidity above the test devices (or the base 66) to obtain a standard waterproof level value.

(33) At step S1200, the same test device is tested by using the test equipment under calibration to obtain a calibration waterproof level value.

(34) The arrangement of the test equipment under calibration may also be that shown in FIG. 7.

(35) At step S1300, the test equipment under calibration is calibrated by using the difference between the standard waterproof level value and the calibration waterproof level value. For example, the scale of the test equipment under calibration may be adjusted by adding the difference.

(36) In some situation, the testing and calibrating processes may be performed by using a test device as described above with at least one changed attribute selected from a group including thickness and material of the waterproof mesh, sizes of the holes and the number of the layers of waterproof meshes and the number of the plates. In such a situation, the calibration may be more accurate.

(37) Although some specific embodiments of the present invention have been demonstrated in detail with examples, it should be understood by a person skilled in the art that the above examples are only intended to be illustrative but not to limit the scope of the present invention.