Mechanical system comprising a shaft coupled to a bearing, and method for manufacturing such a system
11624399 · 2023-04-11
Assignee
Inventors
- Mohamadou Bocar Diew (Amilly, FR)
- Yves René Alexis Gachon (Saint-Just-Saint-Rambert, FR)
- Fabrice PROST (SAINT-ETIENNE, FR)
Cpc classification
F16C33/043
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2204/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2206/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05C2201/0448
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2202/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2223/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2202/50
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C33/1065
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C9/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02F3/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16J1/16
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2240/44
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C11/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a mechanical system (1), comprising a bearing (4) and a shaft (10) coupled to the bearing (4), especially for an internal combustion engine, being subjected to average contact pressures of less than 200 MPa. The shaft (10) has at least one area (12) provided with an anti-seizing surface coating (20), having a surface hardness at least twice that of the bearing (4), and a microtexturation (30) comprised of a set of individual microcavities (31), distributed in said area (12). The invention also relates to a method for manufacturing such a mechanical system (1).
Claims
1. A mechanical system comprising a bearing and a shaft coupled to the bearing, said mechanical system comprising an internal combustion engine; wherein the bearing and the shaft are subjected to mean contact pressures of less than 200 MPa; wherein the shaft comprises at least one area provided with: an anti-seizure surface coating, having a surface hardness at least twice that of the bearing, and a microtexturing formed by a set of separated microcavities, distributed within said area; wherein each of the microcavities has a greatest length of between 15 and 100 micrometers, and a depth of between 50 nm and 100 μm.
2. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein the anti-seizure surface coating of the shaft has a surface hardness at least three times that of the bearing.
3. A mechanical system according to claim 2, wherein the anti-seizure surface coating of the shaft has a surface hardness at least six times that of the bearing.
4. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein each of the microcavities has a form ratio less than or equal to 1, defined as the ratio between the depth and the greatest length.
5. A mechanical system according to claim 1 wherein the microcavities are distributed within said area with a surface density of between 5 and 30%, that surface density being defined as the ratio of the total area covered by the microcavities to the total area of said area including those microcavities.
6. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein the microcavities are distributed within said area in a predetermined pattern so as to form a rectangular, square, triangular, or hexagonal network of microcavities on the surface, with spacing between the center of a microcavity and the centers of neighboring microcavities within a single pattern that are between 1 and 10 times the value of a length or a diameter of the microcavities.
7. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein the microcavities are distributed within said area in a random pattern, with spacing between the center of a microcavity and the centers of neighboring microcavities that are randomly between 0.1 and 10 times the value of a length or a diameter of the microcavities.
8. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein the shaft has a cylindrical outer surface fully covered by the surface coating and the microtexturing.
9. A mechanical system according to claim 1, wherein the shaft has a cylindrical outer surface comprising a single localized area covered by the surface coating and the microtexturing, that area at least partially covering the portion of the surface intended to rub against the bearing.
10. A mechanical system according to claim 1 wherein the shaft has a cylindrical outer surface comprising several distinct areas covered by the surface coating and the microtexturing, those areas at least partially covering the portion of the surface intended to rub against the bearing.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The invention will be better understood upon reading the following description, given solely as a non-limiting example, and made with reference to the accompanying figures wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
(12)
(13) The mechanical system 1 comprises a connecting rod 2 and a piston shaft 10, also according to the invention.
(14) The connecting rod 2 comprises a big end forming a first bearing 3, and a small end forming a second bearing 4, which comprises a bronze ring 5 delimiting a cylindrical borehole 6.
(15) The piston shaft 10 is intended to be installed in the bearing 4, more specifically in the borehole 6 of the bronze ring 5.
(16) Alternatively, the bearing 4 may be without the ring 5. The shaft 10 then is housed directly in the borehole of the bearing 4.
(17) The piston shaft 10 comprises a cylindrical outer surface 11 provided with a thin layer of anti-seizure coating 20 made of DLC amorphous carbon.
(18) Alternatively, the coating 20 may be made of molybdenum nitride MoN or Mo2N, or any other anti-seizure material.
(19) The coating 20 constitutes a surface hardening treatment with a tribological function. The coating 20 makes it possible to improve the seizure resistance of the shaft 10, compared to an untreated shaft. In other words, the coating 20 has an outer surface 21 with a better seizure resistance than that of the surface 11.
(20) Furthermore, the coating 20 has a surface hardness greater than that of the surface 11 of the shaft 10. Preferably, the coating 20 is at least twice as hard as the surface 11.
(21) Furthermore, the coating 20 has a surface hardness greater than that of the surface 11 of the shaft 10. Preferably, the coating 20 is at least twice as hard as the surface 11.
(22) Additionally, the coating 20 has a surface hardness greater than that of the borehole 6 of the bearing 4. Preferably, the coating 20 is at least twice as hard as the bearing 4.
(23) Thus, the coating 20 makes it possible to avoid seizure of the piston shaft 10 in the bearing 4 of the connecting rod 3.
(24) The piston shaft 10 comprises a sublayer 18 formed between the surface 11 and the coating 20. By way of non limiting examples, the sublayer 18 may be composed of chromium or chromium nitride.
(25) The piston shaft 10 further comprises outer microtexturing 30 formed by a set of separated microcavities 31 (micrometer-scale cavities), evenly distributed on the surface 11. The microtexturing 30 is intended to reduce the wear speed of the coated shaft 10 and the bearing 4. In practice, reducing the wear speed is a major challenge to preserve the anti-seizure properties of the coating 20 and maintain the clearances between the shaft 10 and bearing 4, and therefore preserve the mechanical function.
(26) The microcavities 31 form a discontinuous outer pattern on the surface 11. The microcavities 31 have the same geometry, dome-shaped with a circular cross-section, delimiting an area whose depth decreases from the edge of the dome to the center.
(27) As shown in
(28) Each of the microcavities 31 has substantially equal dimensions, which are very slightly different given the precision of the laser beam. Within the context of the invention, it is assumed that the microcavities 31 have similar dimensions when the dimensional variations remain between double (×2=+100%) and half (divided by 2=−50%) the mean dimensions of the microcavities 31. As an example, this definition excludes dimensional variations on the order of the next decimal place (×10=+900%) or previous one (divided by 10=−90%).
(29) In order to achieve the desired performance, the microcavities 31 have a diameter between 15 and 100 micrometers, and a depth of between 50 nm and 100 μm. When the dimensions are less than or greater, the tribological behavior of the shaft 10 in the bearing 4 is not satisfactory.
(30) Advantageously, each of the microcavities 31 has a form ratio less than or equal to 1. This form ratio, defined as the ratio between the depth and the greatest length, is optimal to effectively reduce the wear speed of the anti-seizure coating on the shaft 10 and the wear of the bearing 4.
(31) Furthermore, the microcavities 31 are distributed across the surface 11 with a surface density of between 5 and 30%. This surface density is defined as the ratio of that area of the surface 11 which is covered by the microcavities 31 to the total area of the surface 11.
(32) In practice, the sublayer 18 is first applied to the surface 11, for example by reactive or non-reactive magnetron cathode sputtering.
(33) Next, the coating layer 20 is applied to the layer 18, for example by vacuum deposition according to a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process or a plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition (PACVD) process.
(34) Finally, the microtexturing 30 is carried out deterministically on the surface 21 of the coating 20, using a LASER (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) protocol, more specifically called laser ablation.
(35) Alternatively, the microtexturing 30 may be carried out deterministically by plastic deformation replication (for example with a tool that has positive patterns of the microtexturing to be carried out), by chemical treatment (with a gate or mask), or any other technique that makes it possible to achieve the desired characteristics for the microtexture 30 in terms of its shape, dimensions, density, and distribution.
(36) In the example of
(37) A series of tests was conducted on a testbed dedicated to piston shafts, designed to simulate the tribosystem of a piston shaft in a crankshaft connecting rod of an internal combustion engine. The tests have different configurations of materials and microtexturing dimensioning. A protocol has been put in place to distinguish the various solutions tested.
(38) For each test, the tested shaft is made of quenched low-alloy steel whose surface hardness is 635 HV. The shaft and bearing have a diameter of 25 mm, with a diametrical clearance of 20±5 μm. The width of the bearing is 19 mm. The bearing is equipped with a ring 5 opposite the shaft 10.
(39) Some shafts have a DLC amorphous carbon coating of the hydrogenated a-C:H type, having a thickness of 2 μm on a chromium nitride sublayer 0.7 μm thick. Other shafts have a DLC amorphous carbon coating of the non-hydrogenated ta-C type, having a thickness of 0.7 μm on a Cr sublayer about 0.3 μm thick. The hardness ratio of the DLC a-C:H coating and the shaft is 3.5, while the hardness ratio of the DLC ta-C coating and the shaft is 7.
(40) The microtexturing is formed of dome-shaped microcavities, produced by a femtosecond laser.
(41) The tests are carried out in an environment heated to 180° C., at a load of kN, i.e. an applied Hertz pressure of 37 MPa, 45 MPa, and 52 MPa respectively for the aluminum, copper, and steel or coated steel antagonists. The duration of each test is 4 hours.
(42) The tests are detailed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 below.
(43) Table 1 shows the influence of the surface materials in contact. More specifically, it shows the hardness ratio of the materials, the observation of the surfaces, and the damage to the coatings and wear to the shaft and/or bearing if any. The tested surfaces do not contain microtextures. The hardness ratio defined by the hardness ratio of the shaft coating and that of the bearing varies from 1 to 20.
(44) The various configurations of non-textured materials all have a non-compliance. That non-compliance may be related to coating wear on the shaft, when the coating hardness Hv1 is at least twice that of the surface of the bearing Hv2 (tests 1-3, 5). For a hardness ratio Hv1/Hv2 less than or equal to 1, flaking of the coating on the shaft and wear on the bearing 15 μm deep also make that configuration non-compliant (test 4).
(45) These examples illustrate the problem posed by smooth surfaces and the influence of the hardness ratio of the antagonists.
(46) Table 2 shows the influence of the microtexturing density on the coated shaft, with hardness ratios between 5 and 16.7. Microcavities 50 μm in diameter and 500 nm deep are produced on the shaft.
(47) Densities between 5 and 30% (tests 6 to 11, 14 to 17 and 19 to 22) show very low wear (<0.1 μm) on the shaft coating, which illustrates the advantageous effect achieved by the invention. Simultaneously, the wear is not measurable on the bearing. The microtexturing of tests 6 to 11, 14 to 17 and 19 to 22 therefore afford protection to the coated shaft, without leading to bearing damage, independently of the nature of the material constituting the bearing.
(48) On the other hand, for a density over 30% (tests 12, 13, 18, and 23), significant wear is observed on the bearing, so that those configurations are classified as non-compliant.
(49) Table 3 shows the influence of the dimensional parameters of the microtexturing, i.e. the size (greater length) and depth of the microcavities.
(50) Tests 24-32, carried out with microtexturing whose greatest dimension varies from 50 to 90 μm, for depths of 500 nm to 50 μm, are compliant with the criteria of the invention. For those tests, very little wear (<0.1 μm) is measured on the shaft coating.
(51) Tests 33 and 34, conducted with microtexturing sizes greater than 100 μm on the largest dimension, make it possible to observe coating wear on the shaft for tests 33 and 34, which makes them non-compliant with the invention.
(52) Test 36 is carried out with the macroscopic texturing described in patent FR2974399. It shows a non-compliance due to 4 μm of bearing wear and at least 0.2 μm of shaft wear. The texture described in that document does not meet the criteria desired for the invention, namely protecting the coating of the shaft and bearing from wear.
LEGEND OF COLUMN DESIGNATIONS IN THE RESULTS TABLE
(53) A Test number B Nature of the coating on the shaft C Nature of the antagonist ring D Hardness ratio Hv1/Hv2 Hv1: hardness of the shaft's anti-seizure surface coating Hv2: hardness of the antagonist bearing of the shaft E Type of texturing F Density of the textures (%) G Dimensions of the textures (μm) H Depth (μm) I Form factor J Shaft wear K Ring wear L Compliant (C) or non-compliant (NC) M Reason for non-compliance
(54) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Effect of the materials and their hardness on the wear of the shaft and bearing A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1 a-C:H Copper 8.3 No texture 0% 0 0 0 2.2 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft 2 a-C:H Aluminum 20 No texture 0% 0 0 0 2.0 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft 3 a-C:H Steel 5 No texture 0% 0 0 0 2.1 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft 4 a-C:H a-C:H 1 No texture 0% 0 0 0 not measurable 15 μm NC deposit flaking on shaft + bearing wear 5 ta-C Copper 16.7 No texture 0% 0 0 0 0.8 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft
(55) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect of the density of the microtexturing on the wear of the shaft and bearing A B C D E F G H I J K L M 6 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 5% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 7 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 8% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 8 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 9 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 15% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 10 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 20% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 11 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 30% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 12 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 35% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm 5 μm NC bearing wear 13 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 40% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm 8 μm NC bearing wear 14 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 5% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 15 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 10% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 16 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 20% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 17 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 30% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 18 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 40% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm 2 μm NC bearing wear 19 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 5% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 20 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 10% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 21 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 20% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 22 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 30% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 23 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 40% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm 15 μm NC bearing wear
(56) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Effect of the dimensions of the microtexturin2 on the wear of the shaft and bearing A B C D E F G H I J K L M 24 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 0.5 0.01 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 25 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 5 0.1 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 26 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 10 0.2 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 27 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 20 0.4 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 28 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 30 0.6 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 29 a-C:H Steel 5 Microcavities 10% 50 10 0.2 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 30 ta-C Copper 16.7 Microcavities 10% 50 10 0.2 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 31 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 90 0.5 0.006 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 32 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 90 50 0.556 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 33 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 150 0.5 0.003 1.3 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft 34 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 150 5 0.033 1.4 μm not measurable NC deposit wear on shaft 35 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Microcavities 10% 50 0.05 0.001 <0.1 μm not measurable C N/A 36 a-C:H Copper 8.3 Spiral texturing 10% 450 250 0.56 0.2 μm 4 μm NC bearing wear
(57) Other embodiments of a shaft 10 equipping a mechanical system 1 according to the invention are shown in
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63) In the context of the present invention, an “area 12” is defined as a surface of the shaft 10 covered both by the coating 20 and the microtexturing 30. The coating 20 may extend beyond said area 12. Likewise, the microtexturing 30 may extend beyond said area 12.
(64) Preferably, the area 12 corresponds to a friction area between the shaft 10 and the bearing 4. The area 12 may extend beyond the friction area, at lengths that may vary. The area 12 may also correspond to only one part of the friction area. In this case, the rest of the friction area may be covered only with the coating 20 or only with the microtexturing 30, or not be modified at all.
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69) In the context of the invention, it is assumed that the microcavities 35 of the second type have different dimensions when their dimensions are greater than double (×2=+100%) or less than half (divided by 2=−50%) the mean dimensions of the microcavities 31 of the first type. In the present case, the diameter of the microcavities 35 is less than half the diameter of the microcavities 31.
(70)
(71) In
(72)
(73) In
(74) Regardless of the embodiment, the mechanical system 1 is intended to operate under mean contact pressures below 200 MPa at the interface between the bearing 4 and the shaft 10, which comprises at least one area 12 provided both with an anti-seizure surface coating 20 having a surface hardness at least twice the surface hardness 11 of the shaft 10, and a microtexturing 30 formed of a set of separated microcavities, distributed discontinuously within said area 12.
(75) In practice, the mechanical system 1 can be configured differently from
(76) Moreover, the technical characteristics of the various embodiments and variants mentioned above can, in whole or for some thereof, be combined with one another.
(77) Thus, the mechanical system 1 and the method of making same may be adapted in terms of cost, functionality and performance.