Multiphase structured nanocomposite

Abstract

A NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material includes a monoclinic nickel oxide (NiO) phase, a cubic magnesium oxide (MgO) phase, a hexagonal calcium carbonate (CaCO.sub.3) phase, and a hexagonal calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH).sub.2) phase. The NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a granular morphology including spherical particles having an average particle diameter in a range from 10 nanometer (nm) to 50 nm. Further, a CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material includes cubic CaO phases, cubic NiO phases, cubic Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O phases, and hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 phases. The CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a granular morphology including particles having an average particle diameter in a range from 10 nm to 90 nm.

Claims

1. A NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material, comprising: a monoclinic NiO phase; a cubic MgO phase; a hexagonal CaCO.sub.3 phase; and a hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 phase, wherein the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a granular morphology comprising spherical particles having an average particle diameter in a range from 10 to 50 nm; and wherein the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an oxygen content in a range from 40 to 60 atomic % (at. %), a calcium content in a range from 5 to 25 at. %, a nickel content in a range from 8 to 18 at. %, a magnesium content in a range from 8 to 18 at. %, and a carbon content in a range from 5 to 20 at. % wherein at. % is based on the total number of atoms in the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

2. The NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material of claim 1, wherein the spherical particles have an average particle diameter in a range from 20 to 30 nm.

3. The NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material of claim 1, wherein the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an average crystallite size in a range from 40 to 80 nm.

4. A NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material, comprising: a monoclinic NiO phase; a cubic MgO phase; a hexagonal CaCO.sub.3 phase; and a hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 phase, wherein the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a granular morphology comprising spherical particles having an average particle diameter in a range from 10 to 50 nm; wherein the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an oxygen content in a range from 45 to 55 atomic % (at. %), a calcium content in a range from 10 to 20 at. %, a nickel content in a range from 10 to 16 at. %, a magnesium content in a range from 10 to 15 at. %, and a carbon content in a range from 6 to 15 at. % wherein at. % is based on the total number of atoms in the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A more complete appreciation of this disclosure and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary flow chart depicting a method for making a NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite, according to certain embodiments.

(3) FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary block diagram of synthesizing the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite, according to certain embodiments.

(4) FIG. 2A is a graph depicting X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., according to certain embodiments.

(5) FIG. 2B is a graph depicting XRD pattern of the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C., according to certain embodiments.

(6) FIG. 3A is a graph depicting atomic percentage distribution of elements in the synthesized nanocomposite, determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), at a temperature of 600 C., according to certain embodiments.

(7) FIG. 3B is a graph depicting atomic percentage distribution of elements in the synthesized nanocomposite, determined by EDX, at a temperature of 800 C., according to certain embodiments.

(8) FIG. 4A is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., at a magnification of 1 micrometer (m), according to certain embodiments.

(9) FIG. 4B is a SEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C., at a magnification of 1 m, according to certain embodiments.

(10) FIG. 5A shows transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., at a magnification of 100 nanometer (nm), according to certain embodiments.

(11) FIG. 5B shows TEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C., at a magnification of 200 nm, according to certain embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(12) When describing the present disclosure, the terms used are to be construed in accordance with the following definitions, unless a context dictates otherwise.

(13) Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings wherever applicable, in that some, but not all, embodiments of the disclosure are shown.

(14) In the drawings, like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views. Further, as used herein, the words a, an and the like generally carry a meaning of one or more, unless stated otherwise.

(15) Furthermore, the terms approximately, approximate, about, and similar terms generally refer to ranges that include the identified value within a margin of 20%, 10%, or preferably 5%, and any values therebetween.

(16) As used herein, the term room temperature refers to a temperature range of 25 degrees Celsius ( C.)3 C. in the present disclosure.

(17) As used herein, the term nanoparticles (NPs) refers to particles having a particle size of 1 nanometer (nm) to 500 nm within the scope of the present disclosure.

(18) As used herein, the term nanocomposite refers to a composite material that has at least one component with a grain size measured in nanometers.

(19) As used herein, the term nanohybrid composite refers to a material that combines nanomaterials (such as nanoparticles, nanotubes, or nanofibers) with another material, typically a polymer, metal, or ceramic, to form a composite structure. The nanomaterials are typically incorporated at the nanoscale level to enhance the properties of the base material, such as improving strength, conductivity, or flexibility, while maintaining the advantages of both components. The resulting nanohybrid composite exhibits unique properties that are enhanced to the individual materials alone.

(20) As used herein, the term porosity refers to a measure of the void or vacant spaces within a material.

(21) As used herein, the term pore diameter refers to an average width or size of the pores (void spaces) within a material, typically measured in nm or angstroms (). It is a parameter in characterizing the texture and permeability of porous materials, influencing their adsorption, filtration, or catalytic properties. The pore diameter is often determined using methods such as nitrogen adsorption or mercury intrusion, which provide insights into the material's ability to absorb or interact with molecules of specific sizes.

(22) As used herein, the term pore volume refers to the total volume of void spaces (pores) within a material that is capable of being filled by a gas or liquid. It is typically expressed in cubic centimeters per gram (cm.sup.3/g) and is an parameter in characterizing the porous structure of materials, such as adsorbents or catalysts.

(23) As used herein, the term average particle size refers to the mean diameter of nanoparticles in a sample, typically calculated from measurements obtained using techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM), representing the typical size of the particles in the distribution.

(24) As used herein, the term average crystallite size refers to the mean size of crystalline regions in a material, typically determined through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and represents the size of the individual crystal domains within the sample, excluding any amorphous material.

(25) A weight percent of a component, unless specifically stated to the contrary, is based on the total weight of the formulation or composition in which the component is included. For example, if a particular element or component in a composition or article is said to have 5 wt. %, it is understood that this percentage is in relation to a total compositional percentage of 100%.

(26) The present disclosure is intended to include all hydration states of a given compound or formula, unless otherwise noted or when heating a material.

(27) In addition, the present disclosure is intended to include all isotopes of atoms occurring in the present compounds and complexes. Isotopes include those atoms having the same atomic number but different mass numbers. By way of general example, and without limitation, isotopes of hydrogen include deuterium and tritium, and isotopes of carbon include .sup.13C and .sup.14C. Isotopes of oxygen include .sup.16O, .sup.17O, and .sup.18O. Isotopically-labeled compounds of the disclosure may generally be prepared by conventional techniques known to those skilled in the art or by processes analogous to those described herein, using an appropriate isotopically-labeled reagent in place of the non-labeled reagent otherwise employed.

(28) An aspect of the present disclosure is directed to a NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite (also referred to as a nanocomposite material) fabricated using the Pechini sol-gel method. The nanocomposite of the present disclosure includes a multi-phase composition with controlled structural, morphological, and compositional properties for industrial and environmental applications.

(29) According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, a NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material is described. The nanocomposite material includes a monoclinic NiO phase, a cubic MgO phase, a hexagonal CaCO.sub.3 phase, and a hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 phase. In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material may include crystalline phases, but is not limited to quartz, calcite, hematite, magnetite, goethite, dolomite, albite, anorthite, pyrite, fluorite, halite, barite, apatite, rutile, and zircon. In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has an average crystallite size in the range from 20 to 100 nm, preferably 40 to 80 nm, preferably 50 to 70 nm, preferably 55 to 65 nm, preferably 55 to 60 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite material has an average crystallite size of 60.37 nm.

(30) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material is porous. Pores may be micropores, mesopores, macropores, and/or a combination thereof. The pores exist in the bulk material, not necessarily in the molecular structure of the material. The term microporous means that nanocomposite material has pores with an average pore width (i.e. diameter) of less than 2 nm. The term mesoporous means the pores of the nanocomposite have an average pore width of 2-50 nm. The term macroporous means the pores of nanocomposite have an average pore width larger than 50 nm. Pore size may be determined by methods including, but not limited to, gas adsorption (e.g. N.sub.2 adsorption), mercury intrusion porosimetry, and imaging techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray computed tomography (XRCT).

(31) In some embodiments, in the nanocomposite material comprises sheet morphologies, preferably nanosheets, although other morphologies such as nanowires, nanospheres, nanocrystals, nanorectangles, nanotriangles, nanopentagons, nanohexagons, nanoprisms, nanodisks, nanocubes, nanoribbons, nanoblocks, nanotoroids, nanodiscs, nanobarrels, nanogranules, nanowhiskers, nanoflakes, nanofoils, nanopowders, nanoboxes, nanobeads, nanobelts, nano-urchins, nanoflowers, nanostars, tetrapods, and their mixtures thereof are also possible. In a preferred embodiment, nanocomposite material has a granular morphology including spherical particles. In some embodiments, the spherical particles have an average particle diameter ranging from 5 to 75 nm, preferably 10 to 50 nm, preferably 20 to 50 nm, preferably 30 to 50 nm, preferably 20 to 30 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the spherical particles have an average particle diameter of 25.89 nm.

(32) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has an oxygen content in the range from 30 to 70 atomic % (at. %), preferably 40 to 60 atomic % (at. %), preferably 45 to 65 atomic % (at. %), preferably 50 to 60 atomic % (at. %), preferably 55 to 60 atomic % (at %) based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite material has an oxygen content of 48.8% based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material.

(33) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has a calcium content in the range from 2.5 to 30 at. %, preferably 5 to 25 at. %, preferably 10 to 25 atomic % (at. %), preferably 15 to 25 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 20 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite material has a calcium content of 15.6% based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material.

(34) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has a nickel content in the range from 5 to 30 at. %, preferably 8 to 18 at. %, preferably 10 to 18 atomic % (at. %), preferably 15 to 18 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 16 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite material has a nickel content of 13.4% based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material.

(35) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has a magnesium content in the range from 2.5 to 30 at. %, preferably 8 to 18 at. %, preferably 10 to 18 atomic % (at. %), preferably 15 to 18 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 15 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite material has a magnesium content of 13.1% based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material.

(36) In some embodiments, the nanocomposite material has a carbon content in the range of 2.5 to 30 at. %, preferably 5 to 20 at. %, preferably 10 to 20 atomic % (at. %), preferably 15 to 20 atomic % (at. %), preferably 5 to 15 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite has a carbon content of 9.1% based on the total number of atoms in the nanocomposite material.

(37) In one or more embodiments, the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has 24 to 44 wt. %, preferably 30 to 38 wt. % NiO, 15 to 40 wt. %, preferably 25 to 35 wt. % MgO, 15 to 40 wt. %, preferably 23 to 33 wt. % CaCO.sub.3, 3 to 15 wt. %, preferably 4 to 10 wt. % Ca(OH).sub.2, and 1 to 20 wt. %, preferably 1 to 10 wt. % C, based on the total weight of the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(38) According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, a CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material is described. The CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material includes a cubic CaO phase, cubic NiO phases, cubic Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O phases, and hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 phases. In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material may include crystalline phases, but is not limited to quartz, calcite, hematite, magnetite, goethite, dolomite, albite, anorthite, pyrite, fluorite, halite, barite, apatite, rutile, and zircon. In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an average crystallite size in the range from 20 to 100 nm, preferably 40 to 80 nm, preferably 50 to 70 nm, preferably 55 to 65 nm, preferably 55 to 60 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an average crystallite size of 52.65 nm.

(39) In some embodiments, in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material comprises sheet morphologies, preferably nanosheets, although other morphologies such as nanowires, nanospheres, nanocrystals, nanorectangles, nanotriangles, nanopentagons, nanohexagons, nanoprisms, nanodisks, nanocubes, nanoribbons, nanoblocks, nanotoroids, nanodiscs, nanobarrels, nanogranules, nanowhiskers, nanoflakes, nanofoils, nanopowders, nanoboxes, nanobeads, nanobelts, nano-urchins, nanoflowers, nanostars, tetrapods, and their mixtures thereof are also possible. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a granular morphology, including irregular particles. In some embodiments, the irregular particles of nanoparticles may have an average particle diameter ranging from 5 to 100 nm, preferably 10 to 90 nm, preferably 30 to 90 nm, preferably 60 to 90 nm, preferably 20 to 60 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the irregular particles of nanoparticles have an average particle diameter of 35.47 nm.

(40) In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an oxygen content in the range from 35 to 80 at. %, preferably 45 to 70 atomic % (at. %), preferably 45 to 70 atomic % (at. %), preferably 50 to 70 atomic % (at. %), preferably 50 to 60 atomic % (at. %) based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an oxygen content of 54.7% based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(41) In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a calcium content in the range from 2.5 to 30 at. %, preferably, 5 to 25 at. %, preferably 10 to 25 at. %, preferably 15 to 25 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 20 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a calcium content of 14.1% based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(42) In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a nickel content in the range from 2.5 to 20 at. %, preferably 5 to 15 at. %, preferably 7 to 15 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 15 atomic % (at. %), preferably 7 to 10 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a nickel content of 10.4% based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(43) In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a magnesium content in the range from 2.5 to 25 at. %, preferably 5 to 17 at. %, preferably 7 to 17 atomic % (at. %), preferably 10 to 17 atomic % (at. %), preferably 8 to 15 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has a magnesium content of 12.1% based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(44) In some embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has an carbon content in the range from 1.5 to 30 at. %, preferably 3 to 20 at. %, preferably 10 to 20 atomic % (at. %), preferably 15 to 20 atomic % (at. %), preferably 5 to 12 at. %, based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In a preferred embodiment, the nanocomposite has a carbon content of 8.7% based on the total number of atoms in the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(45) In one or more embodiments, the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material has 10 to 32 wt. %, preferably 17 to 27 wt. % CaO, 15 to 40 wt. %, preferably 20 to 35 wt. % NiO, 20 to 45 wt. %, preferably 30 to 42 wt. % Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O, 1 to 15 wt. %, preferably 2 to 8 wt. % Ca(OH).sub.2, and 1 to 20 wt. %, preferably 1 to 15 wt. % C, based on the total weight of the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(46) FIG. 1A illustrates a schematic flow chart of a method 50 of preparing the nanocomposite material. The order in which the method 50 is described is not intended to be construed as a limitation, and any number of the described method steps can be combined to implement the method 50. Additionally, individual steps may be removed or skipped from the method 50 without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

(47) At step 52, the method 50 includes adding a tartaric acid solution to a solution comprising Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O, Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.4H.sub.2O, and Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O under stirring to form a reaction mixture. In some embodiments, other magnesium salts, apart from Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O, may also be used, for example, magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate, magnesium acetate, magnesium carbonate, magnesium citrate, magnesium phosphate, magnesium fluoride, magnesium bromide, magnesium iodide, magnesium oxalate, magnesium tartrate, magnesium formate, magnesium silicate, magnesium arsenate, magnesium molybdate, magnesium tungstate, magnesium chromate, magnesium permanganate, magnesium borate, magnesium selenate, magnesium tellurate, magnesium vanadate, magnesium ferrate, magnesium stannate, magnesium zirconate, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium thiocyanate, magnesium hypochlorite, and magnesium thiophosphate. In some embodiments, the concentration of Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O in the reaction mixture may range from 50 to 100 g/L, preferably 60 to 75 g/L, preferably 62 to 75 g/L, preferably 65 to 75 g/L, preferably 70 to 75 g/L, preferably 72 to 75 g/L. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O in the reaction mixture is 100 g/L.

(48) In some embodiments, other calcium salts, apart from Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.4H.sub.2O, may also be used, for example, the calcium salt may include but is not limited to calcium chloride, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, calcium citrate, calcium phosphate, calcium lactate, calcium oxalate, calcium tartrate, calcium formate, calcium silicate, calcium fluoride, calcium bromide, calcium iodide, calcium arsenate, calcium molybdate, calcium tungstate, calcium chromate, calcium permanganate, calcium borate, calcium selenate, calcium tellurate, calcium vanadate, calcium ferrate, calcium stannate, calcium zirconate, calcium hydroxide, calcium hypochlorite, calcium thiocyanate, and calcium thiophosphate. In some embodiments, the concentration of Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.4H.sub.2O in the reaction mixture may range from 50 to 100 g/L, preferably 60 to 75 g/L, preferably 62 to 75 g/L, preferably 65 to 75 g/L, preferably 70 to 75 g/L, preferably 72 to 75 g/L In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.4H.sub.2O in the reaction mixture is 100 g/L.

(49) In some embodiments, other nickel salts, apart from Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O, may also be used, for example, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel citrate, nickel phosphate, nickel fluoride, nickel bromide, nickel iodide, nickel oxalate, nickel tartrate, nickel formate, nickel silicate, nickel arsenate, nickel molybdate, nickel tungstate, nickel chromate, nickel permanganate, nickel borate, nickel selenate, nickel tellurate, nickel vanadate, nickel ferrate, nickel stannate, nickel zirconate, nickel hydroxide, nickel thiocyanate, nickel hypochlorite, nickel thiophosphate, and nickel cyanide. In some embodiments, the concentration of Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O. in the reaction mixture may range from 50 to 100 g/L, preferably 60 to 75 g/L, preferably 62 to 75 g/L, preferably 65 to 75 g/L, preferably 70 to 75 g/L, preferably 72 to 75 g/L. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O. in the reaction mixture is 100 g/L.

(50) Tartaric acid is added as a chelating agent. In some embodiments, other chelating agents, such as, citric acid, malic acid, mandelic acid and 12-hydroxystearic acid, may also be used. In some embodiments, the chelating agent is selected from a group consisting of one or more of isosteric acid, isocitric acid, aconitic acid, tricarboxylic acid, carboxylic acid, dicarboxylic acid, tricarboxylic acid, aminopolycarboxylic acid and polycarboxylic acid. In some embodiments, the carboxylic acid includes saturated dicarboxylic acids and unsaturated dicarboxylic acids. In some embodiments, the saturated dicarboxylic acids include adipic acid, and succinic acid. The unsaturated dicarboxylic acids include fumaric acid, glutaconic acid, muconic acid, and citraconic acid. In some embodiments, the chelating agent is one or more of disodium edetate, trisodium edetate, sodium citrate, sodium tartrate, lactic acid, sodium polyphosphate, sodium metaphosphate or gluconic acid, and salicylic acid.

(51) In some alternate embodiments, the chelating agent consists of tartaric acid. Tartaric acid includes natural and commercial forms of the acid. In some embodiments, tartaric acid is D-tartaric acid, L-tartaric acid, achiral tartaric acid or racemic mixture of D- and L-tartaric acid forms.

(52) In some embodiments, the concentration of tartaric acid in the reaction mixture may range from 50 to 200 g/L, preferably 100 to 130 g/L, preferably 105 to 130 g/L, preferably 110 to 130 g/L, preferably 115 to 130 g/L, preferably 120 to 130 g/L, preferably 125 to 130 g/L. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of tartaric acid in the reaction mixture is 350 g/L.

(53) At step 54, the method 50 includes adding polyethylene glycol 400 to the reaction mixture to form a stabilized mixture and stirring at 250 C. until a solid is formed. In some embodiments, the polyethylene glycol 400 is added in a dropwise manner into the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, the concentration of polyethylene glycol 400 in the stabilized mixture may range from 25 to 75 ml/L, preferably 35 to 60 ml per liter of stabilized solution, preferably 40 to 60 ml/L, preferably 45 to 60 ml/L, preferably 50 to 60 ml/L, preferably 55 to 60 ml/L. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of polyethylene glycol 400 in the stabilized mixture is 48 ml/L.

(54) At step 56, the method 50 includes calcining the solid at a temperature in the range from 550 to 850 C. for 1 to 5 hours to form the nanocomposite material. In some embodiments, the solid is calcined at a temperature in the range from 550 to 650 C., preferably 570 to 650 C., preferably 600 to 650 C., preferably 625 to 650 C. In one embodiment, the solid is calcined at 600 C. to form NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material. In some embodiments, the solid is calcined at a temperature in the range from 750 to 850 C., preferably 770 to 850 C., preferably 800 to 850 C., preferably 825 to 850 C. In one embodiment, the solid is calcined at 800 C. to form CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite material.

(55) In some embodiments, the solid is calcined for 1 to 5 hours, preferably 1.5 to 5 hours, preferably 2 to 5 hours, preferably 2.5 to 5 hours, preferably 3 to 5 hours, preferably 3.5 to 5 hours, preferably 4 to 5 hours, preferably 4.5 to 5 hours, preferably 2 to 4 hours. In a preferred embodiment, the solid is calcined for 3 hours.

EXAMPLES

(56) The following examples demonstrate a multiphase nanocomposite material and a method of preparation thereof. The examples are provided solely for illustration and are not to be construed as limitations of the present disclosure, as many variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

(57) Example 1: Synthesis of NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposites.

(58) According to the present disclosure, the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposites were synthesized using the Pechini sol-gel method, as described in FIGS. 1A-1B. In particular, for synthesis of the nanocomposites, 35 grams (g) of tartaric acid was dissolved in 100 millilitres (mL) of distilled water. Further, 20 g of magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O), 20 g of calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (Ca(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.4H.sub.2O), and 20 g of nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.6H.sub.2O) were dissolved in 200 mL of distilled water under vigorous stirring. The tartaric acid (C.sub.4H.sub.6O.sub.6) solution prepared in the first step was then added to the nitrate solution under continuous stirring for 30 minutes. Subsequently, 15 mL of polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) was added to the mixture, and stirring continued at 250 C. until complete evaporation of the solvents occurred. The resultant powder was collected and subjected to calcination at 600 C. for 3 hours to obtain the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite. Further, in order to synthesize the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite, the powder was calcinated at 800 C. for 3 hours.

(59) The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirmed the phase composition and crystallinity of nanocomposites synthesized at 600 C. and 800 C., as shown in FIGS. 2A-2B. At 600 C., the identified phases included nickel oxide (NiO), magnesium oxide (MgO), calcium carbonate (CaCO.sub.3), and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH).sub.2), corresponding to card numbers JCPDS (No. 03-065-6920), JCPDS (No. 01-075-1525), COD (2100992), and JCPDS (No. 00-044-1481), respectively. The above listed phases exhibited monoclinic, cubic, and hexagonal crystal systems. The monoclinic NiO displayed 2 angles of 37.25 and 75.24, corresponding to Miller indices (001) and (021), respectively. The cubic MgO exhibited 2 angles at 43.23, 62.75, and 79.22, assigned to Miller indices (200), (220), and (222), respectively. The hexagonal CaCO.sub.3 showed 20 angles at 23.18, 29.48, 31.48, 36.19, 39.56, 47.42, 48.68, 56.76, 57.60, 60.96, 64.84, 70.29, 72.92, and 76.81, with corresponding Miller indices (012), (104), (006), (110), (113), (018), (116), (211), (122), (208), (300), (0 2 10), (128), and (220). The hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 exhibited 2 angles at 18.04, 34.19, 50.78, 54.14, and 59.39, assigned to Miller indices (001), (101), (110), (111), and (200), respectively. Furthermore, at 800 C., the identified phases included calcium oxide (CaO), nickel oxide (NiO), magnesium nickel oxide (Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O), and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH).sub.2), corresponding to card numbers JCPDS (No. 01-070-4068), JCPDS (No. 01-086-8824), JCPDS (No. 01-082-9883), and JCPDS (No. 01-078-0315), respectively. The above listed phases exhibited cubic and hexagonal crystal systems. The cubic CaO displayed 2 angles at 32.21, 53.94, 64.22, and 67.47, assigned to Miller indices (111), (220), (311), and (222), respectively. The cubic NiO exhibited a 2 angle of 37.36, corresponding to Miller index (111). The cubic Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O exhibited 2 angles at 43.12, 62.75, 75.13, and 79.11, corresponding to Miller indices (200), (220), (311), and (222), respectively. The hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 exhibited 2 angles at 18.04, 28.86, 34.09, 47.23, and 50.89, assigned to Miller indices (001), (100), (011), (012), and (110), respectively. The average crystallite size of the nanocomposites synthesized at 600 C. and 800 C. was 60.37 nm and 52.65 nm, respectively, as listed in Table 1 and Table 2. The difference in crystallite size may be attributed to the thermal decomposition behavior of the precursors and the influence of the Pechini sol-gel method using tartaric acid and polyethylene glycol 400, as higher calcination temperatures generally promote phase transformation and particle growth.

(60) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Structural and compositional details of the synthesized nanocomposite at 600 C. Average crystallite size of synthesized Components of synthesized nanocomposite at 600 C. nanocomposite Phase Chemical name Card No. Crystal system (nm) NiO Nickel oxide JCPDS-03-065-6920 Monoclinic 60.37 MgO Magnesium oxide JCPDS-01-075-1525 Cubic CaCO.sub.3 Calcite COD-2100992 Hexagonal Ca(OH).sub.2 Calcium hydroxide JCPDS-00-044-1481 Hexagonal

(61) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Structural and compositional details of the synthesized nanocomposite at 800 C. Average crystallite size of synthesized Components of synthesized nanocomposite at 800 C. nanocomposite Phase Chemical name Card No. Crystal system (nm) CaO Calcium oxide JCPDS-01-070-4068 Cubic 52.65 NiO Nickel oxide JCPDS-01-086-8824 Cubic Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O Magnesium JCPDS-01-082-9883 Cubic nickel oxide Ca(OH).sub.2 Calcium JCPDS-01-078-0315 Hexagonal hydroxide

(62) The atomic percentage distribution of elements in the nanocomposites are shown in FIGS. 3A-3B. The elemental analysis for NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposites synthesized at 600 C. and at 800 C., respectively were determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). For the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., the atomic percentages of carbon (C), oxygen (O), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), and nickel (Ni) were 9.1%, 48.8%, 13.1%, 15.6%, and 13.4%, respectively. Further, the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C. exhibited atomic percentages of 8.7%, 54.7%, 12.1%, 14.1%, and 10.4% for carbon, oxygen, magnesium, calcium, and nickel, respectively. The increase in the oxygen content and the decrease in carbon, magnesium, calcium, and nickel contents for the sample synthesized at 800 C. may be attributed to thermal decomposition and phase transformations during calcination. At higher temperatures, enhanced oxidation occurs, leading to a higher proportion of oxygen in the final nanocomposite. Concurrently, the volatilization of residual organic components and the stabilization of crystalline phases contribute to the observed reduction in the atomic percentages of other elements. The aforementioned results aligned with the structural changes confirmed by the XRD analysis, indicating the formation of more oxidized and stable phases at elevated temperatures.

(63) The SEM images of the synthesized nanocomposites are shown in FIGS. 4A-4B. In particular, FIG. 4A corresponds to the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., while FIG. 4B corresponds to the CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C. The SEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C. showed agglomerated spherical particles with relatively uniform distribution. In contrast, the SEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C. exhibited irregularly shaped particles, including polygonal and aggregated forms, with enhanced surface roughness. The average grain size of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C. was 135.58 nm, while the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C. had a reduced average grain size of 77.89 nm. This reduction in grain size was attributed to the increased calcination temperature, which promoted further decomposition of residual organic materials and results in more compact and refined crystallite structures. The above listed observations aligned with the structural transformations evident from the XRD and EDX analyses.

(64) In addition, the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the nanocomposites synthesized at 600 C. and 800 C. are shown in FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B, respectively. The TEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C., as shown in FIG. 5A, revealed spherical and nearly uniform particles with minimal agglomeration, indicating desirable dispersion and a narrow size distribution. The TEM image of the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C., as shown in FIG. 5B, exhibited larger and more irregularly shaped particles, including polygonal structures and aggregated clusters, suggesting the effects of thermal treatment on particle growth and morphology. The average particle diameter of the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C. was 25.89 nm, whereas the nanocomposite synthesized at 800 C. was 35.47 nm. The increase in particle size at the higher calcination temperature was attributed to enhanced crystallite growth and particle agglomeration driven by thermal energy, which facilitated the fusion of smaller particles into larger ones. The morphological differences aligned with the structural transformations and crystallite size variations as observed in XRD and SEM analyses.

(65) Aspects of the present disclosure include the NiO/MgO/CaCO.sub.3/Ca(OH).sub.2/C and CaO/NiO/Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O/Ca(OH).sub.2/C nanocomposites, fabricated using the Pechini sol-gel method. The prepared nanocomposites exhibited potential for commercial applications across various fields. The nanocomposites may be utilized in environmental remediation for adsorbing heavy metal ions and toxic pollutants from aqueous media, focusing water pollution concerns. Additionally, the synthesized nanocomposites may be employed in catalysis for industrial chemical processes and in advanced materials for energy storage or conversion, such as in batteries or fuel cells, due to their distinctive structural and compositional properties.

(66) The distinctiveness of the synthesized nanocomposites appear from the multi-phase composition of the nanocomposites and desirable structural properties. Further, XRD analysis confirmed the formation of distinct phases, including NiO, MgO, CaCO.sub.3, Ca(OH).sub.2, CaO, and Mg.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.5O, with average crystallite sizes of 60.37 nm for the nanocomposite synthesized at 600 C. and 52.65 nm for the one synthesized at 800 C., demonstrating the impact of calcination temperature on crystallinity. SEM revealed differences in particle morphology, with spherical and relatively uniform grains averaging 135.58 nm for the nanocomposite fabricated at 600 C. and irregular polygonal grains with an average size of 77.89 nm for the nanocomposite fabricated at 800 C., indicating enhanced compaction and refinement at higher temperatures. EDX analysis provided atomic distribution insights, which depicted changes in elemental percentages attributed to thermal decomposition and oxidation processes during calcination. TEM further highlighted the particle morphology, showing spherical particles for the 600 C. nanocomposite with an average diameter of 25.89 nm and irregularly shaped, larger particles for the 800 C. nanocomposite with an average diameter of 35.47 nm, reflecting particle growth and agglomeration under elevated temperatures. The Pechini sol-gel method may provide scalability and cost-effectiveness while delivering advanced material properties, positioning the synthesized nanocomposites as a contribution to the field of multifunctional nanomaterials.

(67) Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present disclosure are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.