TAPE, ZIPPER TAPE, TAPE-EQUIPPED CONTAINER, AND ZIPPER TAPE-EQUIPPED CONTAINER
20220332472 · 2022-10-20
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B65D75/5805
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B65D33/2508
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
A44B19/16
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Y10T428/17
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
B65D33/25
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
A44B19/16
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A tape having a cross sectional profile including first and second thick portions and a thin portion provided between the first and second thick portions is provided. The first and second thick portions and the thin portion are made of a resin composition whose main component is polyethylene. The density of at least a part of the thin portion is higher than a density of the first and second thick portions.
Claims
1. A tape having a cross sectional profile comprising a first thick portion, a second thick portion, and a thin portion provided between the first and second thick portions, wherein the first and second thick portions and the thin portion are made of a resin composition whose main component is polyethylene, and a density of at least a part of the thin portion is higher than a density of the first thick portion and a density of the second thick portion.
2. The tape according to claim 1, wherein the density of the at least a part of the thin portion is in a range from 930 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3.
3. The tape according to claim 1, wherein a density of at least a part of the first and second thick portions is in a range from 900 kg/m.sup.3 to 930 kg/m.sup.3.
4. The tape according to claim 1, wherein the tape has a tearing resistance of 4 N or less.
5. The tape according to claim 1, wherein the tape has a tearing resistance range of less than 3.3 N.
6. The tape according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first thick portion, the second thick portion, or the thin portion is made of a resin composition comprising bio-polyethylene.
7. The tape according to claim 1, wherein the cross sectional profile comprises a first portion and a second portion configured to at least partially face each other, and at least one of the first portion or the second portion comprises the first and second thick portions and the thin portion in a cross sectional profile thereof.
8. A zipper tape comprising a first portion and a second portion in a cross sectional profile thereof, the first and second portions being configured to at least partially face each other, wherein each of the first and second portions comprises in a cross sectional profile thereof a base strip and an engagement portion protruding from the base strip, the engagement portion of the first portion and the engagement portion of the second portion being engageable with each other, the cross sectional profile of at least one of the first portion or the second portion comprises a first thick portion continuous with the base strip, a second thick portion, and a thin portion provided between the first and second thick portions, the engagement portion, the base strip, the first and second thick portions, and the thin portion are made of a resin composition whose main component is polyethylene, and a density of at least a part of the thin portion is higher than a density of the first thick portion and a density of the second thick portion.
9. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein the first thick portion is thicker than the base strip.
10. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein the density of the at least a part of the thin portion is in a range from 930 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3.
11. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein a density of at least a part of the first and second thick portions is in a range from 900 kg/m.sup.3 to 930 kg/m.sup.3.
12. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein the zipper tape has a tearing resistance of 4 N or less.
13. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein the zipper tape has a tearing resistance range of less than 3.3 N.
14. The zipper tape according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the engagement portion, the base strip, the first thick portion, the second thick portion, or the thin portion is made of a resin composition comprising bio-polyethylene.
15. A tape-attached container comprising: a container body at least comprising a first area and a second area that face each other, and the tape according to claim 7, at least a part of the first portion of the tape being bonded to the first area and at least a part of the second portion of the tape being bonded to the second area.
16. The tape-attached container according to claim 15, wherein the container body is bag-shaped.
17. The tape-attached container according to claim 15, wherein the thin portion is provided with a rib extending in a longitudinal direction of the tape and protruding in a thickness direction of the tape, and a top of the rib is bonded to the first area or the second area.
18. The tape-attached container according to claim 15, wherein a seal portion adjacent to an outer periphery of the container body is provided to an end of the tape in the longitudinal direction, the first and second portions and the first and second areas being thermally fused at the seal portion, and a thin seal portion that traverses the seal portion along the longitudinal direction of the tape is provided.
19. A tape-attached container comprising: a container body at least comprising a first area and a second area that face each other, and the zipper tape according to claim 8, at least a part of the first portion of the zipper tape being bonded to the first area and at least a part of the second portion of the zipper tape being bonded to the second area.
20. The tape-attached container according to claim 19, wherein the container body is bag-shaped.
Description
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF DRAWINGS
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT(S)
[0026] Suitable exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described in detail below with reference to the attached drawings. It should be noted that components of the same or substantially the same function(s) and structure(s) will be denoted by the same reference numerals herein and in the drawings, omitting repetition of description thereof.
First Exemplary Embodiment
[0027]
[0028] The bag body 110 is made of, for instance, a single- or multi-layered thermoplastic resin film. Specific examples of the thermoplastic resin include low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), and polypropylene (PP). PP is optionally homo polypropylene (HPP), random polypropylene (RPP), or block polypropylene (BPP). When the bag body 110 is made of a multi-layered film, a top base material is optionally biaxially oriented polypropylene (OPP), biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate (OPET), or biaxially oriented nylon (ONy). These resins are not necessarily derived from fossil fuel. For instance, these resins are optionally eco-friendly bioplastic or a mixture of a fossil-fuel-derived resin and bioplastic. The bioplastic is preferably, for instance, bio-polyethylene. The film forming the bag body 110 optionally includes a layer of metal material (e.g. aluminum) and/or a layer of an inorganic material. When the bag body 110 is made of a mono-material in a form of a resin composition whose main component is polyethylene in the same manner as the tape 120 described later, a highly recyclable and eco-conscious arrangement is available. Further, the use of bio-polyethylene in a form of polyethylene allows more highly recyclable and eco-conscious arrangement.
[0029] Although the bag body 110 is formed by mutually bonding two films at a top seal portion 112, a bottom seal portion 113 and side seal portions 114 in the present exemplary embodiment, the bag body 110 is optionally formed by folding a single film at a part corresponding to one of the side seal portions 114 in some embodiments. Additionally or alternatively, the film is optionally interfolded at a part(s) corresponding to the bottom seal portion 113 and/or the side seal portions 114 to form a so-called gusset. In this case, the gusset is optionally formed by the same film(s) as the first area 111A or the second area 111B or by a film independent of the film(s). The tape-attached bag 100 is optionally a stand up pouch capable of standing upright on the gusset formed at a bottom thereof.
[0030] As shown in
[0031] In the present exemplary embodiment, the tape 120 is made of a mono-material in a form of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene. In other words, an entirety of the tape 120 (i.e. the first thick portions 121A, 121B, the second thick portions 122A, 122B, and the thin portions 123A, 123B) is made of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene. The main component herein refers to a component accounting for not less than a predetermined ratio of the resin composition. Specifically, the main component is typically a component whose content is 50 mass % or more, preferably a component whose content is 70 mass % or more, more preferably a component whose content is 90 mass % or more, further preferably a component whose content is 95 mass % or more, especially preferably a component whose content is 98 mass % or more, most preferably a component whose content is 100 mass %. It should however be noted that the presence of an additive(s) and/or impurities is acceptable even when the content of the main component is 100%. The main component is measurable by, for instance, an infrared method (IR method). Polyethylene, which is the main component of the resin composition forming the tape 120, is optionally bio-polyethylene in a form of a plant-based resin or a mixture of fossil-fuel-based polyethylene resin and bio-polyethylene in a form of a plant-based resin, without being limited to fossil-fuel-based polyethylene resin. Forming the tape 120 from a mono-material in a form of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene results in a highly recyclable and eco-conscious arrangement. The use of bio-polyethylene in a form of polyethylene further allows a more highly recyclable and eco-conscious arrangement.
[0032] Further, in the present exemplary embodiment, the density of the thin portions 123A, 123B (sometimes simply referred to as “thin-portion density” hereinafter) of the tape 120 is higher than the density of the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B (sometimes simply referred to as “thick-portion density” hereinafter). Preferably, the thin-portion density is in a range from 930 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is in a range from 900 kg/m.sup.3 to 930 kg/m.sup.3. More preferably, the thin-portion density is in a range from 940 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is in a range from 905 kg/m.sup.3 to 925 kg/m.sup.3. Further preferably, the thin-portion density is in a range from 950 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is in a range from 910 kg/m.sup.3 to 925 kg/m.sup.3. The density can be measured according to JIS K 7112:1999. It should be noted that, at a density of the thick portion of 930 kg/m.sup.3 or less, the thick portion can be easily flattened after bonding the tape 120 to the bag body 110 and the number of pinholes can be minimized.
[0033] With the above-described difference in densities, the ductility of polyethylene (the main component of the resin composition) is relatively weakened in the thin portions 123A, 123B, thus reducing the stretch of the thin portions before being stress-ruptured. Accordingly, when, for instance, a user is going to tear the bag body 110 from a notch 115 formed in one of the side seal portions 114 at an end of the tape 120 in the longitudinal direction, the thin portions 123A, 123B, at which the stress concentrates, is ruptured at an early stage of stretch of the thin portions. By rupturing the tape 120 at the thin portions 123A, 123B, the first area 111A and the second area 111B of the bag body 110, which are respectively bonded to the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B at both sides of the thin portions 123A, 123B, are torn to form an opening in the bag body 110.
[0034] In the present exemplary embodiment, the width of the thin portions 123A, 123B (i.e. dimension in a width direction of the tape 120) is typically 1 mm or more, preferably 2 mm or more. By enlarging the width of the thin portions, the tolerable range of the offset in the notch 115 in the width direction of the tape 120 is widened, thereby improving the production efficiency. The upper limit of the width of the thin portions, which is not particularly limited, is typically 5 mm, preferably 4 mm or less, because the larger width of the thin portions results in consumption of larger amount of the film material not forming the containing space SP. Further, the thickness of the thin portions 123A, 123B is typically in a range from 10 μm to 120 μm, preferably in a range from 20 μm to 100 μm, more preferably in a range from 30 μm to 80 μm. When the thickness of the thin portions exceeds 120 μm, the thin portions are possibly difficult to be torn in opening the bag. In contrast, when the thickness of the thin portions is less than 10 μm, the difference from the thickness of the thick portions possibly becomes too large to keep the shape of the tape 120, thereby, for instance, deteriorating the production efficiency. The thickness of the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B is typically 150 μm or more, preferably 200 μm or more, further preferably 250 μm or more. The upper limit, which is not particularly limited, is 700 μm in view of the convenience for flattening during the production process.
[0035] As described above, in the present exemplary embodiment, even when the tape 120 is made of a mono-material in a form of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene, the tape 120 can be easily torn along the thin portions 123A, 123B, so that an opening can be easily formed in the bag body 110 with the tape 120.
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039] In the example shown in
[0040]
[0041]
[0042] In the above example described with reference to
[0043] It should be noted that the resistance in tearing the bag (tearing resistance) is measurable through a trouser tear test (JIS K7128-1). A bag can be easily opened when, for instance, the tearing resistance of the tape 120 is 4 N or less, and can be more easily opened when the tearing resistance of the tape 120 is 3 N or less. The tearing resistance is preferably 2 N or less, more preferably 1 N or less. The lower limit of the tearing resistance, which is preferably as low as possible, is typically about 0.1 N. The tearing resistance is measurable by a method described in Examples. A tearing resistance range, which is an index for the stretch of the tape 120 when being torn, is, for instance, less than 3.3 N, preferably 2.2 N or less, more preferably 1.2 N or less, further preferably 0.5 N or less, especially preferably 0.3 N or less. The lower limit of the tearing resistance range, which is not specifically limited, is typically 0 N. Appearance is likely to become more favorable with smaller stretch when being torn. The tearing resistance range is also measurable by the trouser tear test according to the method described in Examples.
Second Exemplary Embodiment
[0044]
[0045] As shown in
[0046] In the present exemplary embodiment, the first thick portions 121A, 121B are continuous with the base strips 224A, 224B, respectively. The first thick portions 121A, 121B are thicker than the base strips 224A, 224B. It should be noted that the engagement portions 225A, 225B are not necessarily shaped as illustrated but are optionally shaped as in engagement portions of known various zippers (e.g. a combination of claw-shape, hook-shape, and knob-shape). The engagement portion 225A and the engagement portion 225B, which are respectively male-shaped and female-shaped in the illustrated example, are optionally vice versa. Further, although a pair of engagement portions is provided in the illustrated example, pairs of engagement portions are optionally provided. An entirety of the zipper tape 220 (i.e. the first thick portions 121A, 121B, the second thick portions 122A, 122B, the thin portions 123A, 123B, the base strips 224A, 224B, and the engagement portions 225A, 225B) is made of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene. The main component of the resin composition is defined in the same manner as that described in the above-described first exemplary embodiment. Further, polyethylene, which is the main component of the resin composition forming the zipper tape 220, is optionally bio-polyethylene in a form of a plant-based resin or a mixture of fossil-fuel-based polyethylene resin and bio-polyethylene in a form of a plant-based resin, without being limited to fossil-fuel-based polyethylene resin.
[0047] In the present exemplary embodiment, as in the first exemplary embodiment, the density of the thin portions 123A, 123B of the zipper tape 220 is higher than the density of the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B. Specifically, the thin-portion density is preferably in a range from 930 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is preferably in a range from 900 kg/m.sup.3 to 930 kg/m.sup.3. More preferably, the thin-portion density is in a range from 940 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is in a range from 905 kg/m.sup.3 to 925 kg/m.sup.3. Further preferably, the thin-portion density is in a range from 950 kg/m.sup.3 to 970 kg/m.sup.3 and the thick-portion density is in a range from 910 kg/m.sup.3 to 925 kg/m.sup.3. The density can be measured according to JIS K 7112:1999. The width and thickness of the thin portions 123A, 123B and the thickness of the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B are the same as those in the first exemplary embodiment.
[0048] Accordingly, as in the first exemplary embodiment, when a user is going to tear the bag body 110 from the notch 115 formed in one of the side seal portions 114 at an end of the zipper tape 220 in the longitudinal direction, the thin portions 123A, 123B, at which the stress concentrates, is ruptured at an early stage of the stretch of the thin portions in the present exemplary embodiment. By rupturing the zipper tape 220 at the thin portions 123A, 123B, the first area 111A and the second area 111B of the bag body 110, which are respectively bonded to the first thick portions 121A, 121B and the second thick portions 122A, 122B at both sides of the thin portions 123A,123B, are torn to form an opening in the bag body 110. Accordingly, in the present exemplary embodiment, even when the tape 220 is made of a mono-material in a form of the resin composition whose main component is polyethylene, the zipper tape 220 can be easily torn along the thin portions 123A, 123B, so that an opening can be easily formed in the bag body 110 with the zipper tape 220.
[0049] It should be noted that the resistance in tearing the bag (tearing resistance) is measurable through a trouser tear test (JIS K7128-1). A bag can be easily opened when, for instance, the tearing resistance of the zipper tape 220 is 4 N or less, and can be more easily opened when the tearing resistance of the zipper tape 220 is 3 N or less. The tearing resistance is preferably 2 N or less, more preferably 1 N or less. The lower limit of the tearing resistance, which is preferably as low as possible, is typically about 0.1 N. The tearing resistance is measurable by a method described in Examples. The tearing resistance range, which is an index for the stretch of the zipper tape 220 when being torn, is, for instance, less than 3.3 N, preferably 2.2 N or less, more preferably 1.2 N or less, further preferably 0.5 N or less, especially preferably 0.3 N or less. The lower limit of the tearing resistance range, which is not specifically limited, is typically 0 N. Appearance is likely to become more favorable with smaller stretch when the tape is torn. The tearing resistance range is also measurable by the trouser tear test according to the method described in Examples.
[0050]
[0051]
[0052] It should be noted that modifications described with reference to
[0053] The container body is exemplarily described as a bag-shaped bag body in the above exemplary embodiments. However, the tape or the zipper tape is optionally attached to a container body of any other shape than a bag to provide a tape-attached container or a zipper-tape container. The first thick portion, the thin portion, and the second thick portion are exemplarily continuous in the above-described examples. However, when, for instance, not only the thick portion but also the thin portion is attached to a surface of the container body, at least one disconnected portion is optionally provided between the first thick portion and the thin portion or between the thin portion and the second thick portion to provide the tape or the zipper tape in a form of a combination of a plurality of elongated components.
EXAMPLES
[0054] Openability of the zipper tape according to the second exemplary embodiment of the invention described above with reference to
[0055] In the zipper tape according to Example 1, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 913 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 953 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 330 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 60 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0056] In the zipper tape according to Example 2, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 913 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 963 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 330 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 60 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0057] In the zipper tape according to Example 3, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 920 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 946 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 340 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 60 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0058] In the zipper tape according to Example 4, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 920 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 931 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 340 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 60 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0059] In the zipper tape according to Example 5, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 920 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 953 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 360 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 100 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0060] In the zipper tape according to Example 6, the material of the thick portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 920 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min, and the material of the thin portion was high-density polyethylene whose density was 953 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 5.0 g/10 min. The material compositions were extruded and molded through an extruder and were subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 380 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 120 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0061] In a zipper tape according to Comparative 1, the material of the thick portion and the thin portion was linear low-density polyethylene whose density was 920 kg/m.sup.3 and melt flow rate was 4.0 g/10 min. The material composition was extruded and molded through an extruder and was subsequently water-cooled to prepare a zipper tape. The thick portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 340 μm and a length in the width direction of 19 mm. The thin portion of the zipper tape had a film thickness of 60 μm and a length in the width direction of 3 mm.
[0062] Evaluation results of the tear test of Examples and Comparative are shown in Table 1. The details of the evaluation test are described below.
[0063] Tearing Resistance
[0064] The tearing resistance of the zipper tape was measured by a test of tearing the zipper tape in a longitudinal direction using a test machine (AGS-X 1 kN manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation) adapted for a trouser tear test (JIS K7128-1). Specific steps include cutting the zipper tape into 150-mm width pieces, making a notch of 75-mm length into the thin portion of each of the pieces, and setting the pieces to the tensile test machine. Then, the pieces were pulled in up-down directions at a rate of 200 mm/min and an average of the tearing resistance of remnant 50-mm section (i.e. excluding 20-mm section after the start of tearing and 5-mm section before the end of tearing) was calculated.
[0065] Stretch when being Torn
[0066] The stretch of the zipper tape when being torn was evaluated in terms of tearing resistance range [N] (i.e. a difference between maximum and minimum values of the measurements of the tearing resistance in the remnant 50-mm section excluding 20-mm section at the start of tearing and 5-mm section before the end of the tearing during the above trouser tear test). Table 1 shows the tearing resistance ranges of Examples and Comparative. It is determined that a smaller tearing resistance range leads to smaller stretch of the zipper tape when being torn, allowing smoother opening process and providing more excellent appearance after being opened.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Evaluation Results of Tearing Test for Examples and Comparative Tearing Thick-Portion Thin-Portion Thickness of Thickness of Tearing Resistance Density Density Thick Portion Thin Portion Resistance Range [kg/m.sup.3] [kg/m.sup.3] [μm] [μm] [N] [N] Ex. 1 913 953 330 60 0.96 0.285 Ex. 2 913 963 330 60 1.45 0.233 Ex. 3 920 946 340 60 1.28 0.345 Ex. 4 920 931 340 60 2.06 2.345 Ex. 5 920 953 360 100 2.31 0.090 Ex. 6 920 953 380 120 2.75 0.111 Comp. 1 920 920 340 60 2.25 3.356
[0067] As a result of the above tear test, the zipper tape was torn along the thin portion. In Examples 1 to 4, the tearing resistance was in a range from 0.96 N to 2.06 N, which was lower than Comparative 1 (2.25 N). In these Examples, appearance after the tape was torn was improved more than Comparative. Examples 5 and 6 showed higher tearing resistance than Comparative. However, the stretch after the tape was torn was improved more than Comparative. Specifically, the tearing resistance range was 3.356 N in Comparative 1. The tearing resistance range in all of Examples 1 to 6 was smaller than Comparative 1 (less than 3.3 N). In view of the results shown in Table 1, examples of the tearing resistance range are preferably 2.2 N or less, more preferably 1.2 N or less, further preferably 0.5 N or less, especially preferably 0.3 N or less. From the results, it is confirmed that the exemplary embodiment of the invention, in which high-density polyethylene was used for the thin portion, can smoothly tear the tape or the zipper tape along the thin portion.
[0068] Suitable exemplary embodiments of the invention have been detailed above with reference to the attached drawings. However, the scope of the invention is not limited to these exemplary embodiments. It would be obvious for those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that various modifications and revisions are conceivable within the technical idea described within claims, and it is understood that such modifications and revisions are naturally within the technical scope of the invention.