TREATMENT METHOD FOR A CUTTING PIECE, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT
20250353144 ยท 2025-11-20
Inventors
- Frederic CHATEAU (CHAMPTOCE, FR)
- Julien JEANNEAU (CARQUEFOU, FR)
- Pierre RICHET (Metz, FR)
- Florent SPONEM (VIGY, FR)
Cpc classification
B24C1/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24B1/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24C11/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24C1/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B24C1/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24B1/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24C1/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B24C5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Equipment for treating a cutting piece is provides which includes an ultrasonic shot peening apparatus arranged for throwing shots on a cutting surface of the cutting piece so the cutting surface defines a cutting surface with shot impacts; and a grinding device arranged for grinding the cutting surface with shot impacts over a chosen thickness so that the cutting surface with the shot impacts defines a treated cutting surface.
Claims
1. Equipment for treating a cutting piece, the equipment comprising: an ultrasonic shot peening apparatus arranged for throwing shots on a cutting surface of the cutting piece so the cutting surface defines a cutting surface with shot impacts; and a grinding device arranged for grinding the cutting surface with shot impacts over a chosen thickness so that the cutting surface with the shot impacts defines a treated cutting surface.
2. The equipment as recited in claim 1 wherein the grinding device is configured for grinding the cutting surface with the shot impacts over a thickness chosen between 0.02 mm and 1.5 mm.
3. The equipment as recited in claim 2 wherein the grinding device is configured for grinding the cutting surface with the shot impacts over a thickness chosen between 0.05 and 0.2 mm.
4. The equipment as recited in claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus is configured for throwing the shots on the cutting surface for between 0.7T and I0T until the cutting surface is covered by shot impacts, wherein T is defined as the time needed to cover 100% of the surface with shot impacts.
5. The equipment as recited in claim 4 wherein the cutting surface is subjected to the shots for between T and 2T.
6. The equipment as recited in claim 1 wherein the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus is configured for throwing the shots as spherical balls with a diameter between 0.5 mm and 5 mm.
7. The equipment as recited in claim 1 wherein the shots thrown have a total weight between 0.1 grams and 500 grams.
8. The equipment as recited in claim 1 wherein the shots thrown have a total weight between 1 gram and 50 grams.
9. The equipment as recited in claim 1 further comprising a dedicated support set on a vibrating surface of the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus, the support supporting the cutting piece at least partly, and being arranged for masking a binding face of the cutting piece up to and including the cutting edges.
10. The equipment as recited in claim 9 wherein the dedicated support includes at least two movable pieces.
11. The equipment as recited in claim 1, wherein the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus includes a sonotrode for throwing the shots.
12. The equipment as recited in claim 11, further comprising a piezo-electric transducer for generating an ultrasonic vibration to excite the sonotrode.
13. The equipment as recited in claim 11, further comprising a generator for exciting the piezo-electric transducer.
14. The equipment as recited in claim 12, further comprising a booster located between the piezo-electric transducer and the sonotrode, the booster increasing an amplitude of the ultrasonic vibration.
15. The equipment as recited in claim 12, wherein the ultrasonic vibration has a frequency between 10 KHz and 60 KHz.
16. The equipment as recited in claim 12, wherein the ultrasonic vibration has a frequency between 15 kHz and 25 KHz.
17. The equipment as recited in claim 12, wherein the ultrasonic vibration has a frequency between 15 kHz and 20 KHz.
18. The equipment as recited in claim 13, wherein the generator excites the piezo-electric transduce by delivering a sinusoidal electric field.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will emerge clearly from its description, given below by way of example and which is in no way restrictive, with reference to the appended figures in which:
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] The invention aims, notably, at proposing a treatment method, and associated equipment, intended for treating a cutting piece in order to increase its hardness and to increase substantially its lifetime.
[0042] In the following description it will be considered as an example that the cutting piece 2 is a rotary knife or wheel, such as the one illustrated in
[0043] As mentioned above, the invention proposes a treatment method intended for treating a cutting piece 2 (here a rotary knife illustrated in
[0044] The treatment method according to the invention is described below with reference to the example of algorithm schematically illustrated in
[0045] In a first step, a cutting surface 5 of the cutting piece 2 is subjected to shots 12 thrown by the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus 10 to become a cutting surface 5 with shot impacts.
[0046] This first step is represented in
[0047] For instance, and as illustrated schematically and functionally in
[0048] The generator 13 is arranged for delivering a sinusoidal electric field intended for exciting the piezo-electric transducer 14. The piezo-electric transducer 14 is arranged for converting the electric energy of the sinusoidal electric field into an ultrasonic vibration, whose frequency is for example comprised between 10 and 60 kHz, preferably between 15 and 25 kHz, and more preferably of 20 kHz. The pre-booster 15 and booster 16 are arranged for increasing the amplitude of the ultrasonic vibration delivered by the piezo-electric transducer 14. The sonotrode 19, as the final vibrating component, is use to throw the shot 12 (see
[0049] When the full surface of the cutting surface 5 cannot be located into the treatment chamber, the cutting piece 2 is moved relative to the terminal part 17. It may be moved in a continuous manner or sequentially (i.e. each time it is considered that the portion of the cutting surface 5 inside the treatment chamber has been sufficiently subjected to shot impacts). So, in the case where the cutting piece 2 is a rotary knife it may be driven in rotation by an axis of a dedicated electrical motor, for instance. In this last embodiment, between 15 to 25 rotations of the cutting piece 2 may be performed in order to homogenize the shot impacts. For instance, the rotation speed may be less than 10 rpm. For instance, this rotation speed is preferably equal to 4 or 5 rpm.
[0050] For instance, in the first step each portion of the cutting surface 5 may be subjected to shot 12 until it is covered by shot impacts on a surface chosen between 70% of its own full surface and 1000% of this full surface, preferably between 100% of its own full surface and 200% of this full surface. 100% means that the shot of the surface is carried out for a time T until 100% of the surface is covered with shot impacts. 200% means that the shot of the surface is carried out for a time 2T. 70% means that the shot impacts (12) do not strictly cover the full surface, but it does not mean that only 70% of the blade is treated, indeed the diameter of the shots is not the diameter of the treated surface, it may be larger. For instance, each portion of the cutting surface 5 may be subjected to shot 12 until it is covered by shot impacts on a surface equal to 125% (exposition time of 1.25T) of its own full surface.
[0051] Shots are preferably substantially spherical, likes balls, in particular with maximum tolerance of 60 micrometers ([mu] m) on sphericity. The shot preferably comprises at least one non-ferrous material at its surface, advantageously tungsten carbide (WC). The shot may be made entirely out of tungsten carbide, but they could be also made of steel, stainless steel, ceramic, glass, nickel base alloy and titanium alloy. The shots 12 have preferably a diameter comprised between 0.5 mm and 5 mm.
[0052] Also for instance, in the first step one may provide the treatment chamber with shots 12 having a total weight comprised between 0.1 grams and 500 grams, preferably between 1 gram and 50 grams. One of skill in the art can adjust the total weight of the shots 12 according to the volume of the treatment chamber.
[0053] In a second step of the treatment method the cutting surface 5 with shot impacts is ground over a chosen thickness to become a treated cutting surface 5. This second step is represented in
[0054] This chosen material removal thickness is carried out by the grinding device 11 of the equipment 9.
[0055] For instance, this grinding may consist in a controlled grinding using grindstones or millstones.
[0056] Also for instance, in the second step the thickness may be chosen between 0.02 mm and 1.5 mm, preferably between 0.05 and 0.2 mm.
[0057] At least three different implementations of the first step in the first example may be envisaged.
[0058] In a first implementation the first step may comprise first 100 and second 110 sub-steps, as illustrated in the non-limiting example of
[0059] In a first sub-step 100 illustrated in
[0060] In a second sub-step 110 illustrated in
[0061] In a second implementation the first 100 and second 110 sub-steps of the first implementation are reversed. So, in a first sub-step the opposite sides 6 are subjected to shots 12 thrown by the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus 10 while the binding face 8 of the cutting surface 5 is masked up to the cutting edges 7, and in a second sub-step the binding face 8 is subjected to shots 12 thrown by the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus 10 while the opposite sides 6 with shot impacts are masked up to the cutting edges 7.
[0062] According to the invention, at least the cutting edges 7 are masked up to avoid any damage on their surface. For instance, in the first or second implementation, the opposite sides 6 of the cutting surface 5 may be masked from the cutting edges 7 on a height comprised between 1 mm and 50 mm, preferably between 1 mm and 10 mm, and more preferably between 4 mm and 10 mm.
[0063] In a third implementation, only the opposite sides 6 are subjected to shots 12 thrown by the ultrasonic shot peening apparatus 10 under the same operating conditions as for the second sub-step of the first implementation and the first sub-step of the second implementation. This third implementation is carried out when the cutting surface 5 has been previously treated by the first or the second implementation because the opposite sides 6 wear faster than the binding face 8.
[0064] In a second example
[0065] Two known treatment methods named ultrasonic needle peening method (or UNP, equivalent to Ultrasonic cold forging technology previously described) and ultrasonic needle straightening method (or UNS), have been performed by means of apparatuses such as the ones produced by SONATS under references STRESSVOYAGER UNP (also called NOMAD) and STRESSVOYAGER UNS. In these methods, needles are guided on an end-piece at the extremity of a peening head. Thanks to the ultrasonic vibration, needles (or impactors) are thrown against the surface area to be treated and have a high frequency back and forth movement.
[0066] Another method named ultrasonic shot peening (or USP) method has been tested. This method can be performed by means of an apparatus such as the one produced by SONATS under reference STRESSVOYAGER USP. It performs a surface treatment by throwing shots on the cutting surface of a cutting piece in order to improve its hardness. Shots are propelled by metallic elements forming an acoustic block vibrating with an ultrasonic frequency. A generator delivers a sinusoidal electric field which excites a piezo-electric transducer to convert this electric energy into an ultrasonic vibration. The vibration delivered by the piezo-electric transducer being too small for throwing shots, it is increased by a serial of pre-booster and booster to reach a value that is enough efficient for a terminal part of the acoustic block named the sonotrode. This terminal part is covered by a peening fixture comprises a housing with a treatment chamber where the cutting surface of the rotary knife is temporarily located with the shots. The longitudinal vibration of the sonotrode surface randomly throws the shots into the treatment chamber. Therefore, the treatment is homogeneous on all surfaces of the enclosure and consequently on the cutting surface to treat.
[0067] Comparative results without any surface treatment and with the treatment according to the invention are illustrated in the diagram of
[0068] The first curve c1 illustrates the evolution of the micro hardness of a first untreated rotary knife 2 as a function of the depth (in m). The second curve c2 illustrates the evolution of the micro hardness of a second rotary knife 2 having been treated according to the invention with shots 12 having a first diameter equal to 1.5 mm, a first total weight of shots 12 equal to 4 grams, and a first coverage of the cutting surface 5 by shot impacts equal to 125%, as a function of the depth. The third curve c3 illustrates the evolution of the hardness of a third rotary knife 2 having been treated according to the invention with shots 12 having the first diameter, the first total weight of shots 12, and a second coverage of the cutting surface 5 by shot impacts equal to 3000%, as a function of the depth. The fourth curve c4 illustrates the evolution of the hardness of a fourth rotary knife 2 having been treated according to the invention with shots 12 having a second diameter equal to 4 mm, a second total weight of shots 12 equal to 10 grams, and the first coverage of the cutting surface 5 by shot impacts equal to 125%, as a function of the depth.
[0069] The second c2, third c3 and fourth c4 curves show increases of the hardness compare to the first curve c1 (without treatment), not only in surface but also in depth (or bulky) and particularly at 1 mm of depth. The fourth curve c4 shows the best results in depth and therefore the corresponding set of parameters can be actually considered as optimal for the considered rotary knife 2.
[0070] Thanks to the invention, an important increase of the cutting piece lifetime is obtained. For instance, more than 12270 tons of metal strip may be cut with the same rotary knife, which corresponds to around 380 km of metal strip that may be cut without any defect with the same rotary knife, while only 75 km can be obtained with a traditional rotary knife. Therefore, according to the method and the equipment of the invention, the length of metal strip subjected to the cutting with the same knives may be multiplied by 5.