Annular magnetic body for noise control and member for noise control
12476030 ยท 2025-11-18
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01F1/15333
ELECTRICITY
H01F2017/065
ELECTRICITY
H05K9/00
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A split-type annular magnetic body for noise control, which has been difficult to produce with Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys, is provided and obtains an excellent noise reduction effect. The annular magnetic body for noise control includes thin strips of soft magnetic metal laminated along a radial direction and is used by having a cable inserted therethrough. The annular magnetic body for noise control includes a plurality of split pieces divided into a non-annular shape and is used by placing split surfaces of the split pieces in contact with each other to form an annular shape. The product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces is 7.0 m.Math.A/m or less. The flatness FL is the sum of absolute values of the maximum value and the minimum value of a cross-sectional curve measured in accordance with JIS B 0601:2001.
Claims
1. An annular magnetic body for noise control comprising thin strips of soft magnetic metal laminated along a radial direction, the annular magnetic body being used by having a cable inserted therethrough, wherein the annular magnetic body for noise control comprises a plurality of split pieces divided into a non-annular shape and is used by placing split surfaces of the split pieces in contact with each other to form an annular shape, a product FLHc of a flatness FL of the split surfaces and a coercivity Hc of the split pieces is 7.0 m.Math.A/m or less, where the flatness FL is a sum of absolute values of a maximum value and a minimum value of a cross-sectional curve measured in accordance with JIS B 0601:2001, an arithmetic mean roughness Ra and a maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces satisfy Ra0.7 m and Rz10 m, respectively, a radial crushing strength is 50 MPa or more, the soft-magnetic metal strips include an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy, and a surface pressure on the split surfaces is 0.05 MPa or more.
2. The annular magnetic body for noise control according to claim 1, wherein an impedance relative permeability rz at a frequency of 100 kHz is 6000 or more.
3. A member for noise control comprising: the annular magnetic body for noise control according to claim 1; and a split-type core case in which subcases formed by dividing a cylinder into a non-annular shape are connected in an openable and closable manner to form a cylindrical shape, the subcases storing the split pieces of the annular magnetic body for noise control one by one, wherein when the split-type core case is closed, the split surfaces of the split pieces come in contact with each other inside the split-type core case to form the annular magnetic body for noise control.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the Accompanying Drawings:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) The present disclosure is described below in detail. In the present specification, a numerical value range represented by - means a range that includes the numerical values listed before and after the - as the lower and upper limits.
(11) [Annular Magnetic Body for Noise Control]
(12) An annular magnetic body for noise control in the present disclosure is an annular magnetic body for noise control including thin strips of soft magnetic metal laminated along a radial direction, the annular magnetic body being used by having a cable inserted therethrough, wherein the annular magnetic body for noise control includes a plurality of split pieces divided into a non-annular shape and is used by placing split surfaces of the split pieces in contact with each other to form an annular shape, and a product FLHc of a flatness FL of the split surfaces and a coercivity Hc of the split pieces is 7.0 m. A/m or less, where the flatness FL is the sum of absolute values of the maximum value and the minimum value of a cross-sectional curve measured in accordance with JIS B 0601:2001.
(13)
(14) Since Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys are a laminate of thin strips of soft magnetic metal with high brittleness, they are limited in shape when molded, are easily chipped, and are difficult to handle. It has therefore been difficult to provide a split-type annular magnetic body for noise control 100 using an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy. Even if a split-type annular magnetic body for noise control 100 was produced using an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy, the high brittleness led to inadequate control of the split surfaces, and a sufficient noise reduction effect could not be obtained.
(15) After independent and diligent study, we discovered that controlling the surface roughness of the split surfaces and the coercivity of the split pieces so that the product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces 1a, 1b is 7.0 m.Math.A/m or less yields an excellent noise reduction effect with the impedance relative permeability rz at a frequency of 100 kHz being 6000 or more. We thereby developed the present annular magnetic body for noise control 100. To obtain a better noise reduction effect, the product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces 1a, 1b is preferably 6.5 m.Math.A/m or less and more preferably 2.0 m.Math.A/m or less. The lower limit of the product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces is not particularly limited but is preferably 0.005 m.Math.A/m or more based on the relationship with the lower limits of flatness and coercivity, as described below.
(16) Here, the flatness refers to the sum of absolute values of the maximum value and the minimum value of a cross-sectional curve measured in accordance with JIS B 0601:2001. However, when the maximum value of the cross-sectional curve contains a noise peak, the maximum peak height Rp of the roughness curve is designated as the maximum value. Furthermore, when the minimum value of the cross-sectional curve contains a noise peak, the peak is not included in the calculation of flatness. For each of the split surfaces of the split pieces 1a, 1b (a total of four surfaces in the example in
(17) In the present application, the cut surfaces can be polished to adjust the flatness of the split surfaces 10a, 10b obtained after polishing. The flatness can be adjusted by factors such as the grit size of the coated abrasive used for polishing. When a protective layer is applied to the split surfaces 10a, 10b using a rust inhibitor, film sheet, or the like, as described below, the flatness of the split surfaces 10a, 10b is measured after the protective layer is applied.
(18) The coercivity of the split pieces 1a, 1b is the average of three measurements taken using an Automatic Coercivity Meter K-HC1000 manufactured by Tokyo Tokushuko. The coercivity is measured after placing the split surfaces of the split pieces 1a, 1b in contact with each other to form an annular shape. The coercivity of the split pieces 1a, 1b can be adjusted by the material properties of the thin strips of soft magnetic metal, the temperature and time of heat treatment on the thin strips of soft magnetic metal, the method of splitting (cutting) the annular magnetic body for noise control 100, and the polishing conditions of the cut surfaces.
(19) The flatness FL is not limited, as long as adjustments are made so that the product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces 10a, 10b and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces is 7.0 m.Math.A/m or less. The flatness is preferably 1.5 m or less, and more preferably 0.7 m or less. No particular lower limit is placed on the flatness, but from the perspective of mass production by machining, the flatness is preferably 0.05 m or more.
(20) The coercivity Hc is also not limited, as long as adjustments are made so that the product FLHc of the flatness FL of the split surfaces 10a, 10b and the coercivity Hc of the split pieces is 7.0 m.Math.A/m or less. The coercivity Hc is preferably 7.0 A/m or less, and more preferably 5.0 A/m or less. No particular lower limit is placed on the coercivity, but since the coercivity varies depending on the material properties of the thin strips of soft magnetic metal and the polishing conditions of the cut surfaces, the coercivity is preferably 0.1 A/m or more.
(21) The annular magnetic body for noise control 100 includes a plurality of split pieces 1a, 1b divided into a non-annular shape. The number and size of the split pieces composing the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are not particularly limited. As illustrated in
(22) The thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are not particularly limited. In order to obtain an excellent noise reduction effect, a soft magnetic material with low coercivity and high impedance relative permeability is preferred. In order to obtain a particularly excellent noise reduction effect, the thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 more preferably have an impedance relative permeability rz at a frequency of 100 kHz of 6000 or more, even more preferably 12000 or more. In order to obtain a particularly excellent noise reduction effect, the thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 preferably have a coercivity of 7.0 A/m or less.
(23) As soft magnetic materials, ferrites such as MnZn ferrites, NiZn ferrites, and NiZnCu ferrites; soft magnetic metals such as FeNi alloys (permalloy) and FeSi alloys (silicon steel); amorphous alloys such as Co-based amorphous alloys and Fe-based amorphous alloys; Fe-based amorphous alloys; Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys; and the like can be used.
(24) The thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are preferably an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy. When the thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy, for example, an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy having the general formula represented as follows is particularly preferable: (Fe.sub.1-aM.sub.a).sub.100-x-y-z-b-c-dA.sub.xM.sub.yM.sub.zX.sub.bSi.sub.cB.sub.d (atomic %) (where in the formula M is at least one element selected from Co and Ni, A is at least one element selected from Cu and Au, M is at least one element selected from Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta, and W, M is at least one element selected from Cr, Mn, Sn, Zn, Ag, In, platinum-group elements, Mg, N, and S, X is at least one element selected from C, Ge, Ga, Al, and P, and a, x, y, z, b, c, and d are numbers respectively satisfying 0a0.1, 0.1x3, 1y10, 0z10, 0b10, 11c17, and 3d10). The composition of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy is not particularly limited but is preferably, in atomic %, Cu: 0.5% to 2.0%, Nb: 1.0% to 5.0%, Si: 11.0% to 15.0%, and B: 5.0% to 10.0%, with the balance substantially consisting of Fe.
(25) In order to obtain an excellent noise reduction effect, the arithmetic mean roughness Ra of the split surfaces 10a, 10b preferably satisfies Ra0.7 m and more preferably satisfies Ra0.35 m. No particular lower limit is placed on the arithmetic mean roughness Ra of the split surfaces 10a, 10b. The arithmetic mean roughness Ra of the split surfaces 10a, 10b can be adjusted by polishing the cut surfaces. The arithmetic mean roughness Ra of the split surfaces 10a, 10b can be adjusted by the grit size of the coated abrasive used for polishing, the number of abrasive particles in the polishing suspension (liquid with suspended abrasive particles for polishing), the material of the abrasive particles, and the like.
(26) In order to obtain an excellent noise reduction effect, the maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces 10a, 10b preferably satisfies Rz10 m and more preferably satisfies Rz5 m. No particular lower limit is placed on the maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces 10a, 10b. The maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces 10a, 10b can be adjusted by polishing the split surfaces 10a, 10b. The maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces 10a, 10b can be adjusted by the grit size of the coated abrasive used for polishing, the number of abrasive particles in the polishing suspension, the material of the abrasive particles, and the like.
(27) The arithmetic mean roughness Ra and the maximum height roughness Rz of the split surfaces 10a, 10b are measured using a SURFCOM, 1400G surface roughness measuring device, manufactured by Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd, at least at three locations for measurement on each of the split surfaces of the split pieces 1a, 1b (four surfaces in total in the examples in
(28) The radial crushing strength of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is preferably 50 MPa or more. By the radial crushing strength being 50 MPa or more, the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is easier to handle when polishing the split surfaces 10a, 10b, and the split pieces 1a, 1b can be placed in contact with each other while appropriate surface pressure is applied to the split pieces. The radial crushing strength of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is more preferably 70 MPa or higher to facilitate the polishing and cutting process and to maintain the shape more easily. The radial crushing strength of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 has no particular upper limit but may be 800 MPa or less.
(29) The radial crushing strength is measured as follows. As illustrated in
(30) The radial crushing strength of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 can be adjusted by applying resin coating or by wrapping insulation tape around the annular magnetic body for noise control 100, as well as by the type of thin strips of soft magnetic metal that form the annular magnetic body for noise control 100. The annular magnetic body for noise control 100 may be impregnated with resin to increase the radial crushing strength. Epoxy resins, acrylic resins, or mixtures thereof are preferred as resin coatings or resin impregnating agents.
(31) The impedance relative permeability rz of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 at a frequency of 100 kHz is preferably 6000 or more, more preferably 8000 or more, and even more preferably 12000 or more. No particular upper limit is placed on of the impedance relative permeability rz at a frequency of 100 kHz of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100.
(32) The impedance relative permeability rz of a conventional split-type ferrite core at a frequency of 100 kHz is about 4000. In contrast, in the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 of the present disclosure, an impedance relative permeability rz of 6000 or more, which is about 1.5 times the conventional value, and more preferably, an impedance relative permeability rz of 8000 or more, which is about 2.0 times that of the current split-type ferrite core, is obtained. In the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 according to the present disclosure, the noise suppression effect is far greater than that of the current split-type ferrite core, thereby contributing to a reduction in size and weight of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100. The cables for electronic components provided in automobiles, or for power generators, power supply apparatuses, communication devices, and the like are wired in a narrow space. In addition, electronic devices such as inverters and converters for industrial machinery have become smaller in recent years and are therefore often wired within narrow spaces. In order to obtain an excellent noise reduction effect in a conventional split-type ferrite core, it was necessary to increase the number of cable windings for enhancement of the noise reduction effect, or to increase the volume occupied by the magnetic material. In contrast, the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 according to the present disclosure has a far greater noise suppression effect than the current split-type ferrite cores and can be reduced in size and weight, making it particularly effective for attachment to cables for electronic components provided in automobiles, or for power generators, power supply apparatuses, communication devices, and the like, and cables for electronic devices such as inverters and converters for industrial machinery. The annular magnetic body for noise control 100 suppresses the noise generated inside or outside these electronic components and electronic devices and propagated through the cables.
(33) The impedance relative permeability at a frequency of 100 kHz is measured as follows. A 4294A impedance analyzer manufactured by Keysight is used to measure the impedance relative permeability. A 0.5 mm diameter single wire lead (H-PVC manufactured by Tanaka Densen) is passed through the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 once, and measurement is made taking the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b as 0.1 MPa using a fixture for the lead wire (16047E, manufactured by Keysight).
(34) The overall shape of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is not particularly limited as long as the shape is annular. In addition to the perfect cylinder illustrated in
(35) When the overall shape of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is not circular, the jig 5 in
(36) The dimensions of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are not particularly limited and can be set according to the application. In one example, the outer diameter D of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 can be 10 mm or more and can be 300 mm or less. In one example, the inner diameter d of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 can be 2 mm or more and can be 200 mm or less. The height L in the central axis direction of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 can be 2 mm or more and can be 100 mm or less. When the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is not a perfect ring, the outer diameter D and inner diameter d refer to the circle-equivalent outer diameter and circle-equivalent inner diameter, respectively. The dimensions of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 are determined as the average of three measurements taken using calipers, a micrometer, and a microscope image.
(37)
(38) The split surfaces 10a, 10b may have a protective coating or the like by means of a rust inhibitor, film sheet, or the like. The sides (split sides) continuous with the outer circumferential portion of the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 may be protected by a resin coating or tape. The outer circumferential portion (edge) of the split surfaces 10a, 10b may be chamfered.
(39) The annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is preferably used while being restrained with an appropriate load so that the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b is 0.05 MPa or more when the split surfaces 10a, 10b are place in contact with each other. With a conventional split-type ferrite core, the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b was about 0.025 MPa. However, when the split-type annular magnetic body for noise control 100 is produced using a Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy as described above, the split surfaces 10a, 10b tend to be insufficiently controlled due to their high brittleness. Therefore, in addition to adjusting the surface roughness of the split surfaces 10a, 10b as described above, a particularly excellent noise reduction effect can be obtained during use by restraining with an appropriate load so that the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is 0.05 MPa or more. The surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is more preferably 0.10 MPa or more. The upper limit of the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is not particularly limited but is preferably 5.0 MPa or less to suitably prevent deformation and breakage of the split surfaces 10a, 10b due to an excessive load.
(40) The surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b is measured as follows. A prescale sheet manufactured by Fujifilm is placed between the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b, which are then placed in contact, and the surface pressure is measured for 2 minutes.
(41) To place the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 in contact with each other so that the surface pressure applied to the split surfaces 10a, 10b is 0.05 MPa or more, a band or the like can be wrapped around the circumference of the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 after the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b are placed in contact with each other, for example. Alternatively, the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 can be stored in a split-type core case in which subcases formed by dividing a cylinder into a non-annular shape are connected in an openable and closable manner to form a cylindrical shape, and the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b in the split-type core case can be adjusted to be 0.05 MPa or higher. The following describes a member for noise control that includes the above-described annular magnetic body for noise control 100.
(42) [Member for Noise Control]
(43) A member for noise control according to an embodiment may include: an annular magnetic body for noise control, and a split-type core case in which subcases formed by dividing a cylinder into a non-annular shape are connected in an openable and closable manner to form a cylindrical shape, the subcases storing the split pieces of the annular magnetic body for noise control one by one, wherein when the split-type core case is closed, the split surfaces of the split pieces may come in contact with each other inside the split-type core case to form the annular magnetic body for noise control, and a surface pressure on the split surfaces may be 0.05 MPa or more.
(44)
(45) As illustrated in the examples in
(46) When the split-type core case 60 is closed, the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b contact each other inside the split-type core case 60 to form the above-described annular magnetic body for noise control 100. At this time, the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is preferably 0.05 MPa or more. As described above, a particularly excellent noise reduction effect can be obtained during use by restraining with an appropriate load so that the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is 0.05 MPa or more. The surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b is more preferably 0.10 MPa or more when the split-type core case 60 is closed. The upper limit of the surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b when the split-type core case 60 is closed is not particularly limited but is preferably 5.0 MPa or less to suitably prevent deformation and breakage of the split surfaces 10a, 10b due to excessive loads.
(47) The surface pressure on the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b when the split-type core case 60 is closed is measured as follows. The split-type core case 60 in closed by folding about the hinges, and a prescale sheet manufactured by Fujifilm is placed between the split surfaces 10a, 10b of the split pieces 1a, 1b, which are then placed in contact. A sustained surface pressure measurement is made for 2 minutes with the split-type core case 60 closed.
(48) The fact that the core case is a split-type core case 60 facilitates attachment to and removal from the cable, and the split-type core case 60 can be retrofitted and removed even while the cable is connected. Therefore, the amount of noise attenuation can be adjusted by attaching and detaching the split-type core case 60 even while an electronic device or the like is in use.
(49) The material of the split-type core case 60 is not particularly limited. For example, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polyamide (PA), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS); silicone resin and silicone-based elastomer; and the like can be used. Materials that contain glass fiber (GF), carbon fiber (CF), graphite (GP), and the like to improve strength and heat resistance can also be included in the aforementioned thermoplastics.
(50) [Manufacturing Method]
(51) The method of manufacturing the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 according to the present disclosure is not particularly limited. For example, a thin strip of amorphous alloy with a thickness of 5 m to 50 m may be obtained from a molten alloy by a single roll method or the like and may then be rolled into a cylindrical shape and heat treated at a temperature between of 300 C. or more to 700 C. or less for 5 minutes to 20 minutes to obtain an annular magnetic body made of an Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy. The annular magnetic body is cut into a non-annular shape to obtain the split pieces 1a, 1b. The cut surfaces of the split pieces 1a, 1b are polished using coated abrasive to obtain the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 having split surfaces 10a, 10b with a predetermined surface roughness.
(52) Before cutting of the aforementioned annular magnetic body, the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 may be impregnated with resin to increase the radial crushing strength. For example, the annular magnetic body is immersed in a solution of epoxy resin and hardener mixed in a specified quantity ratio, a vacuum is drawn at 0.1 MPa or less, and this state is maintained for about 15 minutes. Subsequently, pressure is returned to atmospheric pressure, and the annular magnetic body is impregnated with the resin. The resin-impregnated annular magnetic body is left in the air at room temperature for about 24 hours to cure. The annular magnetic body after impregnation with resin is cut into a non-annular shape according to the above-described method to obtain the split pieces 1a, 1b. Subsequently, the cut surfaces of the split pieces 1a, 1b are polished using coated abrasive to obtain the annular magnetic body for noise control 100 having split surfaces 10a, 10b with a predetermined surface roughness.
(53) After polishing of the split surfaces 10a, 10b, a protective coating or the like may be formed on the split surfaces 10a, 10b by means of a rust inhibitor, film sheet, or the like. The sides (split sides) continuous with the split surfaces 10a, 10b may be protected by a resin coating or tape. In addition, the outer circumferential portion (edge) of the split surfaces 10a, 10b may be chamfered.
(54) The present disclosure is described below through examples, but the present disclosure is not limited to these examples.
EXAMPLES
Examples 1_1 to 1_7
(55) An annular magnetic body for noise control like the one illustrated in
(56) The obtained annular magnetic bodies for noise control were evaluated for impedance relative permeability, coercivity, surface roughness (flatness, Ra, Rz), surface pressure on the split surfaces, and radial crushing strength according to the methods described above. Table 1 lists the results.
Examples 2_1 to 2_3
(57) The surface pressure on the split surfaces of the split pieces forming annular magnetic bodies for noise control, prepared in the same way as in Example 1_2, was varied, and the impedance relative permeability was measured according to the method described above. The resulting relationship between the impedance relative permeability and surface pressure is summarized in Table 2. For the resulting contact area, the portion of the split surface of the annular magnetic body for noise control that was colored at 0.05 MPa or more was treated as the effective cross-sectional area, and the coloring ratio was confirmed to be 50% or more.
Examples 3_1 to 3_5
(58) In order to confirm the effect, on impedance relative permeability, of the resin impregnated into the annular magnetic body, an annular magnetic body for noise control was prepared in the same way as in Example 1_2, with the impregnated resin being the same epoxy resin as in Example 1_2 for Examples 3_1 to 3_4 and being a one-component acrylic resin for Example 3_5. In Examples 3_3 and 3_4, after resin impregnation, the annular magnetic body for noise control was soaked in epoxy resin separately, the excess epoxy resin was wiped off, and the epoxy resin was left to cure for about 24 hours at room temperature to coat the surface of the annular magnetic body for noise control with epoxy resin. After the resin impregnation or further surface coating with resin, the annular magnetic body for noise control was produced under the same conditions as in Example 1_2. The radial crushing strength and impedance relative permeability of the produced annular magnetic body for noise control were determined according to the methods described above. Table 3 lists the results.
Comparative Examples 1_1 to 1_7
(59) Annular magnetic bodies for noise control were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1_1, except that the split surfaces were polished differently: up to #400 in Comparative Examples 1_1 and 1_2, up to #220 in Comparative Examples 1_3 and 1_4, and not at all in Comparative Example 1_7. The obtained annular magnetic bodies for noise control were evaluated for impedance relative permeability, coercivity, surface roughness (flatness, Ra, Rz), surface pressure on the split surfaces, and radial crushing strength according to the methods described above. Table 1 lists the results. In addition, the impedance relative permeability, coercivity, surface roughness (flatness, Ra, Rz), surface pressure on the split surfaces, and radial crushing strength were evaluated according to the methods described above for conventional MnZn ferrite in Comparative Example 1_5 and conventional NiZn ferrite in Comparative Example 1_6. Table 1 lists the results.
Comparative Examples 2_1 and 2_2
(60) The surface pressure on the split surfaces of the split pieces forming annular magnetic bodies for noise control, prepared under the same conditions as in Example 1_2, was varied, and the impedance relative permeability, coercivity, and flatness were measured according to the methods described above. Table 2 lists the results.
Comparative Examples 3_1 to 3_4
(61) Annular magnetic bodies were prepared under the same conditions as Examples 1_1 to 1_5, except for the use of polyester resin as the resin impregnating agent, and the impedance relative permeability, coercivity, and flatness were measured according to the methods described above. Table 3 lists the results.
(62) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Surface roughness Coercivity Finishing rz of split surface (m) Hc Flatness*Hc Sample name number Magnetic body 0.10 MPa Ra Rz Flatness A/m m*A/m Example 1_1 0.5 m nanocrystalline 14400 0.1 1 0.5 2.0 1.0 alumina film Example 1_2 1.0 m nanocrystalline 9700 0.3 1 1.1 2.0 2.2 alumina film Example 1_3 #2500 nanocrystalline 10700 0.1 2 0.9 2.1 2.0 Example 1_4 #2000 nanocrystalline 12900 0.2 3 0.4 2.0 0.8 Example 1_5 #800 nanocrystalline 6800 0.1 2 1.5 4.1 6.2 Example 1_6 #800 nanocrystalline 6400 0.6 6 2.2 2.7 5.8 Example 1_7 #800 nanocrystalline 6500 0.5 9 2.1 2.6 5.0 Comparative #400 nanocrystalline 5700 0.3 4 1.7 4.6 7.2 Example 1_1 Comparative #400 nanocrystalline 5500 0.8 9 1.8 2.4 4.3 Example 1_2 Comparative #220 nanocrystalline 5800 0.6 11 1.9 2.6 4.9 Example 1_3 Comparative #220 nanocrystalline 5200 0.3 5 2.6 3.2 8.3 Example 1_4 Comparative MnZn ferrite 3400 1.0 8 4.5 4.5 20.2 Example 1_5 Comparative NiZn ferrite 1000 0.4 3 2.3 17.7 41.2 Example 1_6 Comparative nanocrystalline 1500 1.1 20 7.8 2.0 15.6 Example 1_7
(63) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Surface Coercivity pressure Hc Flatness*Hc Sample name rz MPa A/m m*A/m Example 2_1 12300 0.11 1.4 2.0 Example 2_2 9000 0.07 2.7 3.3 Example 2_3 9600 0.47 1.4 2.0 Comparative 5800 0.03 1.3 2.5 Example 2_1 Comparative 5100 0.01 1.7 2.4 Example 2_2
(64) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Radial Resin crushing Coercivity impregnating Resin rz strength Hc Flatness*Hc Sample name agent coating 0.10 MPa MPa A/m m*A/m Example 3_1 epoxy none 11400 90 2.2 3.8 Example 3_2 epoxy none 10000 90 1.4 2.0 Example 3_3 epoxy coated 10000 90 2.4 3.1 Example 3_4 epoxy coated 12700 100 1.7 1.1 Example 3_5 acrylic none 6200 51 2.4 3.4 Comparative polyester none 5800 46 2.0 2.2 Example 3_1 Comparative polyester none 3000 34 2.4 3.9 Example 3_2 Comparative polyester none 4200 35 2.1 1.4 Example 3_3 Comparative polyester none 5500 45 2.6 3.9 Example 3_4
(65) From the above, it can be seen that by satisfying the conditions of the present disclosure, it is possible to produce a member for noise control with an impedance relative permeability rz at a frequency of 100 kHz of 6000 or more.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
(66) The present member for noise control is particularly effective as an annular magnetic body for noise control that is attached to cables for electronic components provided in automobiles, or for power generators, power supply apparatuses, communication devices, OA/FA devices, and the like, to suppress the noise generated inside or outside these electronic components and electronic devices and propagated through the cables.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
(67) 1, 1a, 1b Split piece 10, 10a, 10b Split surface 100 Annular magnetic body for noise control 200 Member for noise control 2 Double-sided tape 3 Inner case 4 Outer case 5 Jig 6a, 6b Subcase 60 Split-type core case 11 Hollow section