Resilient front protective vehicle device having aerodynamic benefit
11623592 · 2023-04-11
Assignee
Inventors
- Raymond Augustus McDonald, Jr. (Pooler, GA, US)
- Gary Alan Grandominico (Galena, OH, US)
- Bret Jameson Moss (Lewis Center, OH, US)
- Crystal Hill (Columbus, OH, US)
Cpc classification
B60R19/56
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60R19/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60R19/03
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B62D35/001
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60R19/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60R19/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60R19/03
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A protective device structure for a vehicle is provided that includes an outer surface or shell attached to or otherwise disposed upon a vehicle that covers a top edge of a vehicle to absorb impact. The protective device can include a compressible portion disposed in a cavity defined between the outer shell and the vehicle proximate to the top front wall of the vehicle.
Claims
1. A resilient protective device configured to absorb and dissipate impact energy for use on a cargo vehicle comprising: a resilient shell comprising: a top face configured to cover a top edge of the cargo vehicle; a lower face configured to attach to a front wall of the cargo vehicle; an offset portion configured to absorb impact, wherein the offset portion connects the top face and the lower face, creating a cavity between the offset portion and a front plane of the cargo vehicle; and wherein the resilient shell is configured to attach solely to the front wall of the cargo vehicle at the lower face, thereby providing rotational deflection capability at the top face and the offset portion.
2. The resilient protective device of claim 1, wherein the resilient shell comprises a resilient plastic.
3. The resilient protective device of claim 1, wherein the resilient shell comprises a composite material.
4. The resilient protective device of claim 1, wherein the resilient shell comprises a metal.
5. The resilient protective device of claim 1, wherein the resilient shell comprises an integral mounting plane at an angle from the cargo vehicle to facilitate mounted lights.
6. The resilient protective device of claim 1, further comprising a compressible portion disposed within the cavity.
7. The resilient protective device of claim 6 wherein the compressible portion comprises an energy absorbent foam.
8. The resilient protective device of claim 6 wherein the compressible portion comprises a plurality of spring devices.
9. The resilient protective device of claim 6 comprising a plurality of horizontal linear segments.
10. The resilient protective device of claim 6 comprising a plurality of vertical linear segments.
11. The resilient protective device of claim 1, further comprising a non-deflective reinforcement element.
12. A protective device for a vehicle comprising: a resilient outer shell configured to attach solely to a selected vertical portion of a front plane of a vehicle; and a compressible portion disposed in a cavity defined between a curved portion of the resilient outer shell and a top front edge of the vehicle, wherein, upon impact, the protective device rotationally deflects in relation to the sole attachment upon the front plane of the vehicle.
13. The protective device of claim 12, wherein the resilient outer shell includes a top face disposed above a top wall of the vehicle, a front face configured to attach to a front wall of the vehicle solely upon a lower portion, and a pair of side faces configured to cover each side wall of the vehicle.
14. The protective device of claim 13, wherein the resilient outer shell further includes a curved portion configured to extend outward from the top wall of the vehicle and curve downward and back toward a surface of the vehicle when the resilient shell is attached to the vehicle, and wherein the curved portion covers the front face and the pair of side faces.
15. The protective device of claim 12, wherein the resilient outer shell has an aerodynamic shape.
16. The protective device of claim 12, wherein the resilient outer shell comprises an integral mounting plane at an angle from the vehicle to facilitate mounted lights.
17. A structure for a vehicle comprising: an outer surface configured to attach solely to a selected vertical portion of a front plane of the vehicle; and to provide impact protection via energy absorption or dissipation with rotational deflection about the selected vertical portion; and a compressible portion integral to the outer surface.
18. The structure of claim 17, wherein the outer surface includes a top face configured to engage with a top wall of the vehicle, a front face configured to attach to a wall of the vehicle, and a pair of side faces configured to engage with and in proximity to each side wall of the vehicle, wherein the front face is configured to attach at the selected vertical portion.
19. The structure of claim 18, wherein the outer surface further includes a curved portion that is configured to extend outward from the top wall of the vehicle and curve downward and back toward the vehicle and to connect to the front face and also connects to the pair of side faces thereby enclosing the outer surface and forming an aerodynamic shape.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(13) The innovation is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject innovation. It may be evident, however, that the innovation can be practiced without these specific details.
(14) While specific characteristics are described herein (e.g., materials, thickness, orientation, configuration, etc.), it is to be understood that the features, functions and benefits of the innovation can employ characteristics that vary from those described herein. These alternatives are to be included within the scope of the innovation and claims appended hereto.
(15) Conventional attempts to mitigate damage to cargo containers have been heavy, cumbersome devices that, when damaged, needed to be replaced.
(16) The innovation disclosed and claimed herein is a new and novel protective device that employs a unique structure, configuration and orientation disposed in a way and configured using materials that enhance impact absorption and dispersion. Additionally, in aspects, upon alleviation of impact, the innovation can resiliently regain (or substantially regain) its original shape as well as configuration and orientation.
(17) In embodiments, the protective device may be configured to secure to a front or rear assembly of the vehicle. Attachment upon the vehicle can be designed such that a void (e.g., gap, space) is left to enhance impact absorption. This configuration will be better understood upon a review of the figures that follow. The protective device may include an outer shell/outer surface manufactured of a resilient material that is configured to absorb impact energy resulting from an impact with an object. In one embodiment, the outer shell/outer surface may be integrally formed or permanently attached to a dampening core. In one embodiment, the outer shell/outer surface may be configured to be releasably or removably attached to the core forming the protective device.
(18) Referring now to the drawings,
(19) In addition to the damage mitigation properties, the protective device 100 can be an aerodynamic structure that is configured to improve aerodynamics thereby increasing fuel efficiency by reducing drag. It is to be appreciated that while
(20) Referring to
(21) The outer shell 200 contains a surface oriented on an integral plane at an angle from the cargo system for mounting lights 212, e.g., complying with federal regulations. The outer shell 200 may be made from a sufficiently rigid (yet resilient) material, such as but not limited to, polymer, metal, fiberglass, composites, plastic, rubber, laminations, resins, etc. or combinations thereof.
(22) The device 100 has been developed via multiple wind tunnel tests, impact tests, and full-scale testing and can be manufactured using an RPTM (Rapid Prototype Tool Molding) process. The product is designed to have impact resilience while providing a fuel savings through its unique aerodynamic properties.
(23) In one aspect, the product weighs approximately 50 pounds, and can be painted with a durable, high performance acrylic polyurethane paint or otherwise molded to a desired color. The 0.4 inch thick device or shell can be manufactured from reinforced resin-included impact polymers.
(24) The device can fasten through the trailer front wall with bolts (e.g., (4) 5/16″ bolts) at each nose post and can be tightened with a rubber bonded washer and lock nut to ensure a long term, tight, sealed connection. The fastening points (e.g., consistent with the trailer posts) allow the device 100 to deflect rearward and absorb the blows caused by tree limbs or trailer to trailer collisions. An example directional motion of the device upon impact is shown in
(25) The robust structure of the device not only helps protect the trailer from damage, but ensures an aerodynamic shape after impact (resiliently regaining shape, configuration and orientation).
(26) The device has been tested multiple times in the wind tunnel, exhibiting drag reduction resulting in fuel savings of approximately 0.5% depending on the configuration. Additionally, the device 100 can be designed to accommodate a combination light, with a face molded at a 45° angle for installation of a PC or PC2 clearance/marker light, in compliance with regulations and standards. The light hole(s) can be pre-drilled with knowledge of the light specification and installation guidelines.
(27) In aspects, in order to properly deflect and protect the trailer, the device's design sits approximately 1¾ inches from the sides of the trailer, within the regulatory limit of 3 inches for a non-property carrying device. The device protrudes out approximately 5¾ inches from the front of the trailer, which is allowable through regulations for an aerodynamic device.
(28) Additionally, it is to be appreciated that materials having resilient properties can be employed so as to enhance the ability of the outer shell (and/or compressible portion) to regain (or substantially regain) its original shape, configuration and orientation following an impact. Moreover, it is to be understood and appreciated that alternative means of attaching or positioning the device upon a vehicle can be employed without departing from the spirit and/or scope of the innovation and claims appended hereto.
(29) While the described example is described as not physically engaging a surface (e.g., top, side wall) of the cargo container (e.g., trailer), it is contemplated that other embodiments may employ engagement tolerances that can achieve a desired impact compression and aerodynamic effect/feature. It is to be understood that the intentional clearance or space between the protective device and the trailer can enhance the energy absorption of the device, with or without an impact core as described herein. Accordingly, these alternative embodiments are to be included within the scope of this disclosure.
(30) Referring to
(31) In other examples, individual corner protection devices can be disposed upon each of the cargo trailer (e.g., 10) corners thereby protecting the corners individually from impact. These corner impact protection devices (not shown) can be used separately or together with a center thereby enhancing the aerodynamic benefits of the device. It will be appreciated that by segmenting the device into two corner units along with a center portion, should damage occur, replacement costs can be mitigated in lieu of replacing a complete protection device unit should an unlikely impact cause irreparable damage. While irreparable damage is unlikely due to the energy absorption features of the innovation, is it to be understood that irreparable damage can occur which exceed the resilient and energy absorbent characteristics of the innovation.
(32) In another embodiment, referring to the cross-sectional view of
(33) Alternatively, the compressible portion 300 may be attached to the curved portion 208 and/or the front wall 14 of the vehicle with a fastening device, such as but not limited to, an adhesive. In other embodiments, the protective device 100 may be a single unit (not shown) made from a compressible material (e.g., foam) and have a structure (e.g., honeycomb) configured to absorb impact energy. It is to be appreciated that, by design, the innovation can be provided to absorb, deflect, or otherwise crush upon impact.
(34) Similarly, aspects can include resilient properties that enable the outer shell 208 of the device 100, and compressible portion 300, to absorb impact energy from a foreign object while returning, or substantially returning, to its original shape upon removal of the foreign object impact. It is to be appreciated that, as shown in
(35) In one embodiment, the protective device may be utilized at either the front or rear assembly (or both) of a vehicle. In one embodiment, the protective device may be used in a vertical configuration at the front and/or rear of the vehicle near the corner assemblies (e.g., top and/or bottom). By contrast,
(36) Referring to
(37)
(38) What has been described above includes examples of the innovation. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the subject innovation, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the innovation are possible. Accordingly, the innovation is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.