Serger seam hook for tucking thread tails
11624136 · 2023-04-11
Inventors
Cpc classification
D05D2305/60
TEXTILES; PAPER
International classification
Abstract
A small, flat and elongated tool is provided, with a hook at its distal end, for inserting between stitches and sliding under the threads of a serged sewing seam. The tool, held between the thumb and finger of a user, is effective to grab the tail threads from the serger seam and to pull them back into the seam.
Claims
1. A method for tucking tail threads of a serger seam applied to a fabric back into the seam to prevent unraveling of serger seam stitches of the seam, comprising: providing a thin, flat hook device having a handle for gripping by a hand of a user, a shaft attached to and distal of the handle and a hook near a distal end of the shaft remote from the handle, the hook being formed as an opening into an edge of the shaft, inserting the distal end of the shaft of the hook device between stitches of the serger seam, at a selected distance back from an end of the serger seam from which the tail threads extend, and sliding the shaft in a distal direction under the serger seam stitches until the distal end and the hook of the device extend out said end of the seam, gripping the tail threads with the hook of the hook device, and pulling the device back proximally such that the tail threads are drawn into the serger seam beneath the stitching threads until the tail threads are fully pulled into the seam and the device has been pulled back out of the seam.
2. The method of claim 1, further including, while pulling the hook device back, rotating the hook device essentially about a long axis of the shaft to turn the hook slightly downwardly against the fabric within the serger seam, thereby helping avoid snagging of any serger seam threads as the hook device is pulled back.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the hook includes a mouth leading to a slot channel, a hook thumb forming a side of the slot channel, and a hook point on an end of the hook thumb, the hook point being directed proximally, and the hook thumb being offset inwardly on the shaft immediately distal of the hook mouth, such that the hook when retracted through the serger seam will tend not to snag on stitch threads of the serger seam.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the slot channel of the hook has a width in a range of about 0.019″ to 0.020″.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the hook slot channel has a length of about 0.06″.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the shaft has a width at the end of the hook thumb that is less than the shaft's width at a more distal point on the shaft, approximately at the inner end of the hook slot channel.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the width at said more distal point is in a range of about 0.003″ to 0.005″ wider than the shaft's width at the hook thumb point.
8. The method of claim 3, wherein the hook thumb is offset inwardly on the shaft by at least about 0.006″ immediately distal of the hook mouth.
9. The method of claim 3, wherein the hook point has a radius of about 0.008″.
10. The method of claim 1, further including cutting off a portion of the tail threads extending out between stitches of the serger seam.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a thickness in a range of about 0.01 inch to 0.02 inch.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a width no greater than about 3/32″.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the hook opening, at a mouth or opening of the hook opening, has a width in a range of about 0.04″ to 0.07″.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the hook device has a proximal end which is formed into said handle, of greater width than the shaft.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a width no greater than 0.1 inch.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a width no greater than 0.08 inch.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a width no greater than 0.0625 inch.
18. The hand tool of claim 1, wherein the shaft has a thickness of about 0.016″.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(6) The drawings show the serger seam hook device 10 in a preferred form. Its overall length can be about 2¼ inches, including the shaft or blade 12 and the handle 14, as shown in
(7)
(8) As shown in
(9)
(10)
(11) As discussed above, the serger seam hook tool 10 is extremely thin and flat, and with a narrow shaft or blade 12, for the purpose described above. An example of preferred dimensions is as follows (with preferred ranges in parentheses): Overall length: 2.25″ (or 2″ to 3″) Width of tab handle 14: 0.625″ (0.35″ to 0.8″) Slot size 14a in handle: 0.075″×0.5625″ (or as desired) Blade/shaft 12 width: 0.0625″ (0.05″ to 0.09″, pref.<0.07″) Blade/shaft 12 length: 1.3″ (0.75″ to 2″ or greater) Thickness of blade/shaft: 0.016″ (0.01″ to 0.03″) Hook slot channel width: 0.019″-0.020″ (0.018″ to 0.024″) Length of hook slot: 0.062″ (at least 0.045″) Hook slot opening (at mouth/exit): 0.050″ (0.04″ to 0.07″) Offset in shaft width at mouth: 0.008″ (0.006″ to 0.010″)
(12) The detail view of
(13) The hook's channel 38 is narrow, shown as being 0.019 inch, and this remains narrow as it curves toward the opening. The overall geometry with the forward (distal) end of the tool being narrower and especially at the end of the thumb 35, creates a hump as referred to above, at the location 40 in the drawing. As explained above, this hump or shoulder helps deflect seam threads from the hook opening, especially as the device is pulled back to draw tail threads into the seam. The difference in width of the shaft at the two sides (distal and proximal) of the hook opening 42, as well as the inward angle of the outer surface of the hook end piece or thumb 34, are important features that enable the tool easily to be pulled back through the serger seam stitches without snagging on the seam stitches themselves. The radius at the tip 35 of the hook end piece (thumb) 34 is also important in this regard. Note that the hump at 40 could be of short length along the shaft 32, just a protrusion of increased width, rather than being continuous through the shaft 32 at that increased width.
(14) As shown, the distal tip 30 of the shaft or blade 12 also has a radius, shown here as 0.012 inch, and the width of the shaft tapers inwardly toward that radiused tip.
(15) As seen in the drawings, particularly
(16) On pulling the serger seam tool 10 back to draw the thread tails into the seam, the user can slightly rotate the tool, turning the hook opening and hook thumb 34 down toward the fabric, thus making it even easier to prevent the hook from catching any of the looped threads that overlap the fabric edge. The narrower width of the end part of the tool with the hook also helps avoid catching the hook on the fabric as it is withdrawn, since this holds the hook slightly above the fabric, held away by the greater width of the shaft in the main part 32.
(17) The dimensions of the invention can vary, but small size sufficient to insert between stitches of a serger seam and to engage and pull tail threads back into the seam is essential. As noted above, the thickness can be somewhat greater if desired, but preferably not greater than about 0.02 to 0.03 inch. It could be somewhat thinner, e.g. about the thickness of an erasing shield, provided the material is sufficiently strong. The width of the tool, at the shaft 32, is described in the preferred embodiment above as 1/16″. This could be narrower (e.g. 0.05″) or slightly greater, but it must be narrow enough to be slid through a serger seam. For example, the width could be as great as 3/32″ for some serger seams (i.e. 0.094″), but the width is preferably less than 0.09″, more preferably less than 0.08″ and most preferably less than 0.07″. The tool could be of greater length if desired. The hook slot could be deeper, but this is normally not needed. The width of the slot could be somewhat less, e.g. 0.018″, or even down to 0.015″, and the thumb at its widest could be 0.015″ to 0.016″. However, manufacturing tolerances, preferably by steel stamping, and the need to engage multiple thread tails limit how small the hook slot can be made, and the thumb needs sufficient strength so as not to easily damage. The handle could be larger and the shaft longer, but the farther the handle from the hook, the less control afforded.
(18) The term “about” in reference to the dimensions herein should be understood as meaning within 10%, plus or minus.
(19) The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.