ARRANGEMENT FOR DETERMINING A CURRENT FLOWING THROUGH A BUSBAR

Abstract

An arrangement for determining a magnitude of an electrical current flowing through a busbar. The arrangement has a measurement conductor which is electrically connected at a first contact point to the busbar and which extends from the first contact point to a second contact point. A third contact point is located on the busbar at a spacing distance from the first contact point. A voltage measurement device is configured to measure a voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point. The arrangement also has a controlled current source which is configured to introduce a measurement current into the measurement conductor.

Claims

1-16. (canceled)

17. An arrangement for determining the magnitude of a current flowing through a busbar, the arrangement comprising: a measurement conductor which is electrically connected to the busbar at a first contact point and which extends from the first contact point to a second contact point; a third contact point arranged at the busbar and spaced apart from the first contact point; a voltage measurement device configured for measuring a voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point; and a controlled current source configured for injecting a measurement current into said measurement conductor.

18. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein: a magnitude of the measurement current is controlled to have the voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point assume a preselected value; and the arrangement further comprises an evaluation device configured to determine the magnitude of the current flowing through the busbar from the magnitude of the measurement current, from a cross sectional area of said measurement conductor that is effective for conducting the current, and from a cross sectional area of the busbar which is effective for conducting the current.

19. The arrangement according to claim 18, wherein the magnitude of the measurement current is controlled to drive the voltage between the second and third contact points to zero.

20. The arrangement according to claim 18, wherein said evaluation device is configured to determine the magnitude of the current flowing through the busbar according to the relationship
I.sub.S=kI.sub.LA.sub.S/A.sub.L wherein I.sub.S is the current flowing through the busbar, k is a proportionality constant, I.sub.L is the measurement current, A.sub.S is the cross sectional area of the busbar effective for conducting the current, and A.sub.L is the cross sectional area of the measurement conductor effective for conducting the current.

21. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said measurement conductor is formed of the same material as the busbar.

22. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said measurement conductor is arranged on a surface of the busbar.

23. The arrangement according to claim 22, wherein said measurement conductor is arranged on the surface of the busbar substantially in a direction of flow of the current flowing through the busbar.

24. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein the busbar is a tubular busbar.

25. The arrangement according to claim 24, wherein said measurement conductor is arranged on an inner surface of the tubular busbar.

26. The arrangement according to claim 24, wherein at least one of said measurement conductor, said voltage measurement device, said controlled current source, or said evaluation device are arranged in an interior of the tubular busbar.

27. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein said measurement conductor is bonded to a surface of the busbar.

28. The arrangement according to claim 17, further comprising an energy transmission line for supplying energy to at least one of said voltage measurement device, said controlled current source, or said evaluation device.

29. The arrangement according to claim 17, further comprising a communication channel for transmitting the determined magnitude of the electrical current flowing through the busbar.

30. The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein a length of a current path in the busbar between said first contact point and said third contact point is substantially equal to a length of a current path in said measurement conductor between said first contact point and said second contact point.

31. A method of determining a magnitude of a current flowing through a busbar, the method comprising: providing a measurement conductor that is electrically connected to the busbar at a first contact point and extends from the first contact point to a second contact point, and a third contact point arranged at the busbar at a spacing distance from the first contact point; measuring a voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point; injecting a measurement current into the measurement conductor; controlling a magnitude of the measurement current to drive the voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point to a preselected value; and determining the magnitude of the current flowing through the busbar from the magnitude of the measurement current, from a cross sectional area of the measurement conductor that is effective for conducting the current, and from a cross sectional area of the busbar that is effective for conducting the current.

32. The method according to claim 31, which comprises controlling the magnitude of the measurement current to cause the voltage between the second contact point and the third contact point to a assume a zero value.

33. The method according to claim 31, wherein the step of determining the magnitude of the current flowing through the busbar comprises resolving the relationship
I.sub.S=kI.sub.LA.sub.S/A.sub.L wherein I.sub.S is the current flowing through the busbar, k is a proportionality constant, I.sub.L is the measurement current, A.sub.S is the cross sectional area of the busbar that is effective for conducting the current, and A.sub.L is the cross sectional area of the measurement conductor that is effective for conducting the current.

34. The method according to claim 31, wherein the measurement conductor and the busbar consist of the same material.

Description

[0037] The invention is explained in greater detail hereinafter using an exemplary embodiment. For this purpose, the

[0038] FIGURE represents an exemplary embodiment of an arrangement for determining the magnitude of a current flowing through a tubular busbar as well as the method taking place in this case.

[0039] The FIGURE represents an exemplary embodiment of an arrangement 1 for determining the magnitude of a current I.sub.S flowing through a busbar 3 in a partial sectional view. In the exemplary embodiment, the busbar 3 is a tubular busbar, of which only two opposite wall areas are represented in cross section. The busbar 3 can in particular be a hollow cylindrical busbar. The busbar 3 has a first contact point A and a third contact point C. The current I.sub.S flows through the busbar from the first contact point A in the direction of the third contact point C. Owing to the ohmic resistance of the busbar, the flowing current I.sub.s creates an electrical potential difference (voltage) between the first contact point A and the third contact point C.

[0040] In the arrangement, the section of the busbar between the first contact point A and the third contact point C therefore serves as a measurement shunt for measuring the electrical current flowing through the busbar 3 (current measurement shunt). An additional measurement shunt is therefore advantageously not required.

[0041] A measurement conductor 5 is electrically connected to the busbar 3 at the first contact point A. Aside from the electrical connection at the first contact point A, the measurement conductor 5 is electrically insulated from the busbar 3. This is indicated schematically in the figure by a spacing between the measurement conductor 5 and the busbar 3. The measurement conductor 5 is therefore electrically connected to the busbar 3 at the first contact point A and is otherwise arranged electrically insulated from the busbar 3. In other words, the measurement conductor 5 is arranged electrically insulated from the busbar 3 and is electrically connected to the busbar 3 (exclusively) at the first contact point A. The measurement conductor 5 can be a simple conductor 5 (for example a simple wire 5), the cross sectional area of which is substantially smaller than the cross sectional area of the busbar 3. The measurement conductor can also be referred to as a reference conductor.

[0042] The measurement conductor 5 extends from the first contact point A to a second contact point B. In the exemplary embodiment, the length of the measurement conductor between the first contact point A and the second contact point B is the same as the length of the current path of the busbar between the first contact point A and the third contact point C. In other words, the length of the current path in the busbar 3 between the first contact point A and the third contact point C substantially corresponds to the length of the current path in the measurement conductor 5 between the first contact point A and the second contact point B. However, these lengths may also be different in other exemplary embodiments.

[0043] Furthermore, the arrangement 1 has a voltage measurement device 8 which is electrically connected to the second contact point B by means of a first voltage measurement line 11a and to the third contact point C by means of a second voltage measurement line 11b. The voltage measurement device 8 is used for measuring a voltage which occurs between the second contact point B and the third contact point C. The voltage measurement device 8 is electrically connected to a controllable/controlled current source 14. This current source 14 is electrically connected to the first contact point A by means of a first feed line 17a. The current source 14 is also electrically connected to the second contact point B by means of a second feed line 17b. The controlled current source 14 introduces a current I.sub.L into the measurement conductor 5. This current I.sub.L flows from the current source 14 via the first feed line 17a, the first contact point A, the measurement conductor 5, the second contact point B and the second feed line 17b back to the current source 14. In this case, the measurement current I.sub.L flowing through the measurement conductor 5 can be much smaller than the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar 3 which is to be determined. For example, the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar 3 can be in the kiloamp range, while the measurement current I.sub.L can be in the milliamp range. This results in only small requirements for the controlled current source 14. For example, the measurement current I.sub.L can be smaller by a factor than the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar 3, wherein the factor is between 10.sup.4 and 10.sup.6, in particular between 10.sup.5 and 10.sup.6. The measurement conductor 5 is oriented substantially in the flow direction of the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar.

[0044] The current I.sub.L flowing through the measurement conductor 5 causes a potential difference between the first contact point A and the second contact point B. By means of the controlled current source 14, the current I.sub.L flowing through the measurement conductor 5 is controlled in such a way that the voltage which occurs between the second contact point B and the third contact point C assumes a preselected (predetermined) value. In the exemplary embodiment, the magnitude of the measurement current I.sub.L is controlled in such a way that this voltage assumes the value zero. However, in other exemplary embodiments, the magnitude of the measurement current I.sub.L can also be controlled in such a way that this voltage assumes a different preselected value.

[0045] As soon as the voltage between the second contact point B and the third contact point C has assumed the preselected value (here: the value zero), the magnitude of the associated measurement current I.sub.L is evaluated or further processed in an evaluation device 20. This evaluation device 20 determines the magnitude of the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar from the magnitude of the measurement current I.sub.L and from the cross sectional area A.sub.L of the measurement conductor 5 which is effective for the current line and the cross sectional area A.sub.S of the busbar 3 which is effective for the current line. The effective cross sectional area A.sub.L of the measurement conductor 5 as well as the effective cross sectional area A.sub.S of the busbar 3 are known and are stored as constants in the evaluation device 20. In this case, the evaluation device determines the magnitude of the current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar according to the relationship

I.sub.S=kI.sub.LA.sub.S/A.sub.L

[0046] In this case, I.sub.S is the current flowing through the busbar, k is a proportionality constant, I.sub.L is the measurement current, A.sub.S is the cross sectional area of the busbar which is effective for the current line and A.sub.L is the cross sectional area of the measurement conductor which is effective for the current line.

[0047] In the exemplary embodiment, the measurement conductor 5 and the busbar 3 consist of the same material, for example copper, aluminum or an alloy with one of these metals. In general, a different current-conducting material may also be used, in particular a metal. The measurement conductor 5 and the busbar 3 therefore have the same specific resistance value. In addition, the electrically effective spacing between the first contact point A and the second contact point B is the same length as the electrically effective spacing between the first contact point A and the third contact point C. In other words, the length of the current path in the busbar between the first contact point A and the third contact point C is substantially the same as the length of the current path in the measurement conductor 5 between the first contact point A and the second contact point B. In this case, the proportionality constant k has the value 1 (k=1). However, this proportionality constant k can also assume values other than 1 in other exemplary embodiments.

[0048] The evaluation device 20 is connected to an energy supply device 24 via an energy transmission channel 23. The energy transmission channel 23 can be configured as a first optical waveguide or as a first electrical conductor, for example. The electronic devices of the arrangement 1 are supplied with electrical energy via the energy transmission channel 23. This means that the voltage measurement device 8, the current source 14 and the evaluation device 20 are supplied with electrical energy via the energy transmission channel 23. In the exemplary embodiment, the energy supply device 24 is arranged outside the busbar 3. The energy transmission channel 23 runs from the interior of the tubular busbar to the energy supply device 24 via a recess 25 in the wall of the busbar. If the busbar 3 is operated at high-voltage potential, the configuration of the energy transmission channel 23 as an optical waveguide is advantageous, through which an electrical potential separation can then be realized.

[0049] Furthermore, the evaluation device 20 is connected to a data processing device 27 by means of a communication channel 26. The communication channel 26 can be configured as a second optical waveguide or as a second electrical conductor, for example. In this case, the data processing device 27 can have a data receiver and/or a data storage device, for example. This data processing device 27 can be a computer arranged at ground potential, for example. In particular, the evaluation device 20 transmits the determined magnitude of the electrical current I.sub.S flowing through the busbar 3 to the data processing device 27 via the communication channel 26. In addition, further data can optionally be transmitted from the evaluation device 20 to the data processing device 27 via the communication channel 26. Optionally, data can also be transmitted in the opposite direction from the data processing device 27 to the evaluation device 20 via the communication channel 26.

[0050] In the exemplary embodiment, the measurement conductor 5 is arranged on a surface 30 of the busbar 3. Specifically, the measurement conductor 5 is arranged on the inner surface 30 of the tubular busbar 3, i.e. in an interior 32 of the tubular busbar 3. The measurement conductor 5 can be bonded to this surface of the busbar by means of an electrically insulating adhesive, for example. As a result, the measurement conductor 5 (aside from the first contact point A) is electrically insulated from the busbar 3. In principle, the arrangement and the method can be used for measuring/determining the current flowing through the busbar 3 at any voltage. However, this arrangement and the method is particularly advantageous in the case of busbars which are at high-voltage potential. By means of the arrangement and the method, the current at high-voltage potential can in fact be determined with a high level of accuracy and high dynamics (i.e. in a wide frequency range). This is advantageous, for example, for the control and the protection of high-voltage power converters (for example for high-voltage direct current transmission) or for the determination of an electrical power transmitted via the busbar 3 (for example for the purpose of settling the power transmission).

[0051] The arrangement and the method were described above using the example of a tubular busbar. However, the arrangement and the method can also be realized with a different busbar, for example with a flat strip busbar.

[0052] The arrangement described and the method described have a number of advantages:

[0053] the arrangement 1 and the method described have a large measuring dynamic range because a part of the busbar 3 is used as a current measurement shunt and additionally only one simple measurement conductor 5 is necessary. In contrast, when using additional resistance-based components as current measurement shunts, significant limitations in the measuring dynamics would have to be anticipated owing to their complicated design and choice of material. Furthermore, temperature measurement and temperature compensation is advantageously not required because the measurement conductor substantially assumes a defined temperature, namely the temperature of the busbar 3. There is also no significant additional power loss because only a comparatively small current flows through the measurement conductor 5. Furthermore, a complex mechanical design for fixing the arrangement (in particular at high-voltage potential) is not required, since the arrangement is preferably arranged inside/in the interior of the tubular busbar 3. If the measurement conductor 5 consists of the same material as the busbar 3, expensive special alloys can also be dispensed with for the measurement conductor. The specific resistance of the measurement conductor is then equal to the specific resistance of the busbar, such that the current flowing through the busbar 3 can be determined in a very simple manner from the measurement current I.sub.L and the ratio of the cross sectional areas of the busbar and of the measurement conductor.

[0054] The arrangement 1 and the method can be realized in a simple and cost effective manner, since apart from the busbar present anyway and the voltage measurement device 8, current source 14 and evaluation device 20, only one cost effective measurement conductor 5 is required. The measurement conductor and the electronic devices (voltage measurement device 8, current source 14, evaluation device 20) lie protected inside the tubular busbar, in particular protected from the weather and in an almost field-free space. The weight of the arrangement is substantially lower than the weight of an additional shunt resistor for large currents would be. In addition, a complex insulation is not required, since the essential components of the arrangement are arranged at the potential of the busbar. The measuring accuracy of the arrangement is barely affected by thermal influences, since the arrangement is at a defined temperature, in particular assumes the temperature of the busbar. As a result of appropriately selecting the cross sectional area of the measurement conductor, the cross sectional area of the busbar, the length of the current path between the first contact point A and the third contact point C and/or the length of the current path between the first contact point A and the second contact point B, well suited values can be selected for the measurement current I.sub.L as well as for the voltage which is to be measured between the second contact point B and the third contact point C, for example values which are well suited for the evaluation in the evaluation device 20. In particular, the cross section of the measurement conductor 5 can be selected in such a way that the measurement current I.sub.L is within a desired range which can be covered in a cost effective manner by means of the current source 14. Additionally equipping the busbar in a complex manner with corona rings or the like is not necessary.

[0055] In particular, a conductor with a small cross sectional area (and thus a very low volume) is sufficient for the measurement conductor 5. This measurement conductor can therefore be attached to the surface of the tubular busbar from the inside in a simple manner (for example bonded to the inner surface of the tubular busbar). The measurement conductor 5 advantageously has the same temperature as the busbar 3. The thermal influence is thus compensated without complex compensation circuits being necessary for this purpose. If the measurement conductor 5 and the busbar 3 consist of the same material, then both elements also have the same specific resistance. When determining the current flowing through the busbar, it is only necessary to drive a (small) current (measurement current I.sub.L) via the measurement conductor 5 and to control the voltage difference between the second contact point and the third contact point to a predetermined value, in particular to zero. This can be done in a simple and precise manner with cost effective technology. In general, the method described and the arrangement described can be realized in a cost effective manner, and a reliable and robust solution for determining the magnitude of a current flowing through the busbar (even at high-voltage potential and/or at high frequencies) is nevertheless made possible.