Fusion antigen of porcine Getah virus, kit, preparation method therefor and application thereof

Abstract

Provided are a fusion antigen of porcine Getah virus (GETV), a kit, a preparation method therefor and an application thereof. The fusion antigen of the GETV is primarily prepared by recombining a Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) gene with a codon- optimized GETV E2 antigen gene to construct an expression vector, and transfecting the expression vector containing GLuc-E2 into mammalian cell lines, resulting in the secretion of GLuc-E2 proteins into a cell supernatant for expression. Without the need for protein purification step, the cell supernatant may be directly collected for disease detection. The present disclosure demonstrates strong specificity and shows no cross- reactivity with African swine fever virus (ASFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), pseudorabies virus (PRV), or Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV).

Claims

1. A fusion antigen of porcine Getah virus (GETV), being a Gaussia luciferase (GLuc)-E2 fusion protein, wherein the GLuc-E2 fusion protein has an amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 2.

2. A method for preparing the fusion antigen of GETV according to claim 1, comprising the steps of: S1, performing codon optimization and synthesizing a nucleotide sequence based on a whole genome sequence of E2 genes from GETV strains, and ligating the sequence-optimized E2 genes into a eukaryotic expression vector pCAGGS (+) plasmid to obtain a recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-E2; S2, taking the plasmid pCAGGS-E2 as a template, amplifying an E2 fragment using a forward primer (F): AAGGGGAGTGGCGATATCTCTGTGACAGAGCACTTTA as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 and a reverse primer (R): AAAAAGATCTGCTAGCTCGAGTCAAGGGTACAGGCCGTAGT as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, performing double digestion on the amplified E2 antigen gene fragment and a pCAGGS-GLuc vector plasmid carrying GLuc genes with EcoRV and XhoI restriction enzymes, and ligating enzyme-digested products using a T4 DNA ligase to obtain a recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-GLuc-E2; and S3, culturing human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293T cells, transfecting the recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-Gluc-E2 into the cells using a liposomal nucleic acid transfection reagent if the cell density reaches 60-70%, further culturing the 293T cells after transfection, and collecting and centrifuging a cell supernatant after culture to obtain the GLuc-E2 fusion protein from the collected supernatant.

3. A luciferase immunoprecipitation kit for detecting porcine GETV, comprising the following components: sample diluent, blocking buffer, GLuc-E2 fusion protein as described in claim 1, protein A-coated microplate, wash buffer, luciferase substrate, positive control, and negative control.

4. The luciferase immunoprecipitation kit for detecting porcine GETV according to claim 3, wherein the sample diluent is phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH=7.4; the wash buffer is PBS containing 0.05% non-ionic surfactant (PBST); and the luciferase substrateis 20 M of coelenterazine h.

5. The luciferase immunoprecipitation kit for detecting porcine GETV according to claim 3, wherein the blocking buffer comprises at least one of 1% of bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% of skim milk, or 10% of skim milk; and the positive control is GETV standard positive serum, and the negative control is GETV standard negative serum.

6. The luciferase immunoprecipitation kit for detecting porcine GETV according to claim 3, wherein a preparation and preservation method for the protein A-coated microplate comprises the steps of: preparing the protein A into a protein A solution with a concentration of 20 g/mL using the PBS, adding the protein A solution to the microplate at 100 L/well, sealing the microplate with a film, discarding the protein A solution after incubating at 4 C. for 16 hours, washing the plate 5 times with PBST at 300 L/well, and drying the microplate at 4 C. for preservation.

7. A construction method for the luciferase immunoprecipitation kit for detecting porcine GETV, comprising the steps of: S1, preparing a GETV GLuc-E2 fusion protein fluid using the methods of claim 2; S2, determining a blocking buffer, the blocking buffer comprising at least one of 1% of BSA, 5% of skim milk, or 10% of skim milk; S3, blocking: setting a sealing temperature at 37 C. and a sealing time at 1 h; S4, incubation: setting an incubation temperature at 37 C. and an incubation time at 1 h; S5, fusion antigen addition: adding fusion antigen at a quantity of 10.sup.7 luminance units; and S6, diluting a serum sample to be tested, and GETV positive or negative control serum samples at a serum dilution ratio of 1:100.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) For ease of illustration, the present disclosure is described in detail with reference to the following specific implementations and the accompanying drawings.

(2) FIG. 1A shows a recombinant GLuc-E2 protein expression validation for Western blot; and

(3) FIG. 1B shows a luciferase activity analysis of the recombinant GLuc-E2 protein in a cell supernatant.

(4) FIG. 2A shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 25 C. for 30 min and incubation at 37 C. for 1 h;

(5) FIG. 2B shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 25 C. for 1 h and incubation at 37 C. for 1 h;

(6) FIG. 2C shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 37 C. for 30 min and incubation at 37 C. for 1 h;

(7) FIG. 2D shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 37 C. for 1 h and incubation at 25 C. for 30 min;

(8) FIG. 2E shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 37 C. for 1 h and incubation at 25 C. for 1 h; and

(9) FIG. 2F shows an analytical diagram of reaction conditions under blocking at 37 C. for 1 h and incubation at 37 C. for 1 h.

(10) FIG. 3A shows an analytical diagram of reaction results between GLuc-E2 with 10.sup.5 luciferase units and serially diluted serum;

(11) FIG. 3B shows an analytical diagram of reaction results between GLuc-E2 with 10.sup.6 luciferase units and serially diluted serum; and

(12) FIG. 3C shows an analytical diagram of reaction results between GLuc-E2 with 10.sup.7 luciferase units and serially diluted serum.

(13) FIG. 4A shows an determination of positive and negative cutoff value for a LIPS method in detecting porcine GETV; and

(14) FIG. 4B shows a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis diagram for determinating the specificity and sensitivity of the LIPS detection method for porcine GETV.

(15) FIG. 5 show a specificity experimental analysis diagram of the LIPS detection method for porcine GETV.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(16) Hereinafter, the technical solutions of the present disclosure are further described in detail with reference to the embodiments. These embodiments are implemented based on the technical solutions of the present disclosure and provide detailed implementations and specific operation processes, but the scope of the protection of the present disclosure is not limited to the following embodiments.

(17) The materials, practices and experimental equipment involved in the embodiments of the present disclosure, unless otherwise specified, all conform to the commercially available products in the relevant chemical and biotechnology fields.

Embodiment 1 Preparation of Porcine GETV GLuc-E2 Fusion Protein

(18) 1.1 Construction of Recombinant Plasmid pCAGGS-GLuc-E2 as a Eukaryotic Expression Vector

(19) Referring to a whole genome sequence of E2 proteins from GETV strains (from Gen Bank: MT086508.1, MT269657.1 and MK693225.1), codon optimization was performed to synthesize a nucleotide sequence, as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. An optimized E2 gene sequence (purchased from GenScript Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) was synthesized, and ligated into a eukaryotic expression vector pCAGGS (+) plasmid to obtain a recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-E2.

(20) The plasmid pCAGGS-E2 was taken as a template, and an E2 fragment was amplified using primers of F: AAGGGGAGTGGCGATATCTCTGTGACAGAGCACTTTA set forth in SEQ ID No: 3 and R: AAAAAGATCTGCTAGCTCGAGTCAAGGGTACAGGCCGTAGT shownset forth in SEQ ID No: 4. Double digestion was performed on the obtained E2 antigen gene fragment and the pCAGGS-GLuc vector plasmid carrying GLuc genes (Constructed and preserved by a laboratory of COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE YANGZHOU UNIVERSITY) with EcoRV and XhoI restriction enzymes, and enzyme-digested products were ligated using a T4 DNA ligase to obtain the recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-GLuc-E2.
1.2 Expression and Verification of Recombinant Gluc-E2 Protein

(21) HEK-293T cells (preserved by the laboratory of COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE YANGZHOU UNIVERSITY) were cultured in a 10 cm.sup.2 of cell culture dish. If a cell density reached 60-70%, the 8 g of the recombinant plasmid pCAGGS-Gluc-E2 was transfected into the 293T cells using a Lipofectamine 2000 liposomal nucleic acid transfection reagent (purchased from Invitrogen) at a ratio of 1.5 L: 1 g, and the cells were cultured in an incubator at 37 C. with 5% of CO.sub.2. After culturing for 60 h, a cell supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 4 C. and 12,000 rpm for 15 min to remove cellular debris. The collected supernatant was the GLuc-E2 fusion protein.

(22) The collected cell supernatant was analyzed by Western blot and Luciferase assay to validate the expression of the GLuc-E2 fusion protein.

(23) The collected cell supernatant was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and protein electrotransfer (i.e., membrane transfer). A protein membrane was blocked in PBS buffer containing 5% w/v skim milk at 37 C. for 2 h, and was incubated overnight at 4 C. using a porcine GETV-positive serum with a serum dilution of 1:1000. After incubation, the protein membrane was washed 3 times with PBST buffer, incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-porcine IgG antibody with a dilution of 1:2000 at room temperature for 1 h, and used for the detection of a chemiluminescence detection kit after washing 3 times with PBST. According to the results, it can be shown that the cell supernatant transfected with pCAGGS-GLuc-E2 contains secreted GLuc-E2, which can be specifically recognized by porcine GETV-positive serum (shown in FIG. 1A).

(24) Moreover, the collected cell supernatant was subjected to GLuc enzymatic activity analysis. 20 L of the cell supernatant was mixed with 100 L of GLuc luminescent substrate coelenterazine h (20 M; and the coelenterazine h was purchased from Shanghai Maokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for reaction, and the GLuc luciferase activity was measured by detecting luciferase values using a LumiStation-1800 luminescence detector. According to the results, it can be shown that the GLuc activity is significantly detectable in the cell supernatant, with luminance units reaching 10.sup.7.94 units/100 L (as shown in FIG. 1B).

Embodiment 2 Parameter Optimization Experiment of the LIPS for Porcine GETV Detection Based on the Recombinant Gluc-E2 Protein

(25) 2.1 Determination of Blocking Buffer, Blocking Temperature, and Blocking Time

(26) The protein A was diluted to a concentration of 20 g/mL using the PBS solution, the PBS solution was added to a microplate at 100 L/well, and the microplate was sealed with a film and incubated at 4 C. for 16 h. The next day, the solution was discarded, and the plated was washed 5 times with PBST, at 5 min per wash. Three blocking buffers prepared in PBS were tested: 5% of skim milk, 10% of skim milk, and 1% of BSA, with incubation temperatures set at 25 C. and 37 C., and blocking time of 30 min and 60 min. After completing the above conditions, the blocking buffer was discarded, and the plate was washed 5 times with PBST, 5 min per wash. Standard GETV-positive or GETV-negative swine serum samples along with GLuc-E2 fusion protein with 10.sup.7 fluorescence units were added to each sample well, achieving a total volume of 100 L, followed by incubation at 37 C. for 1 h. Reaction liquids from all wells were spin-dried, each well was filled with diluted wash buffer of PBST, allowing to stand for 5 min, and the wash buffer was discarded. This washing cycle was repeated for a total of 5 times, and residual liquids were removed by blotting the reaction plate after the final wash.

(27) 50 L of luciferase substrate was added to each well, the luciferase values are detected using the LumiStation-1800 luminescence detector, and recorded.

(28) According to the results, positive/negative (P/N) ratios are calculated under each condition. As demonstrated in FIG. 2, 10% of skim milk exhibits the highest blocking efficiency among the three blocking buffers. As shown in FIG. 2, after blocking with 10% of skim milk at 37 C. for 1 h, the P1/N, P2/N, and P3/N ratios are 290.75, 405.48, and 328.99, demonstrating superior performance compared to other conditions.

(29) 2.2 Determination of Reaction Temperature and Time

(30) The microplate was coated with protein A following the steps described in 2.1, and blocked with 10% of skim milk at 37 C. for 1 h. According to the steps described in 2.1, GLuc-E2fusion protein with 10.sup.7 luminance units was added, along with GETV-positive and negative serums, followed by incubation at 25 C. for 30 min or 37 C. for 1 h. The reaction liquids from all wells were spin-dried, each well was filled with diluted wash buffer of PBST, allowing to stand for 5 min, and the wash buffer was discarded. This washing cycle was repeated for a total of 5 times, and the residual liquids were removed by blotting the reaction plate after the final wash. 50 L of luciferase substrate was added to each well, the luciferase values are detected using the LumiStation-1800 luminescence detector, and recorded.

(31) According to the results, the P/N ratios are calculated under each condition. As demonstrated in FIG. 2, incubation at 37 C. for 1 h demonstrates optimal performance under all reaction conditions, with P1/N, P2/N, and P3/N values of 290.75, 405.48, and 328.99, demonstrating superior performance compared to other conditions.

(32) 2.3 Determination of Optimal Antigen Concentration and Serum Dilution Factor

(33) The microplate was coated with protein A following the steps described in 2.1, and blocked with 10% of skim milk at 37 C. for 1 h. The optimal antigen concentration and serum dilution factor were determined using a limiting serum dilution method. GETV-positive porcine serum was subjected to two-fold serial dilutions (starting at 1:50), extending up to 1:102,400. Furthermore, the GETV-positive porcine serum samples of various dilution factors were mixed with GLuc-E2 fusion protein at 10.sup.5, 10.sup.6, or 10.sup.7 luminance units, and the mixtures were added to the microplate well, followed by incubation at 37 C. for 1 h. The reaction liquids from all wells were spin-dried, each well was filled with diluted wash buffer of PBST, allowing to stand for 5 min, and the wash buffer was discarded. This washing cycle was repeated for a total of 5 times, and the residual liquids were removed by blotting the reaction plate after the final wash. 100 L of luciferase substrate was added to each well, the luciferase values are detected using the LumiStation-1800 luminescence detector, and recorded.

(34) According to the results, the P/N ratios are calculated under each condition. As demonstrated in FIG. 3, the optimal reaction conditions are achieved with an antigen concentration of 10.sup.7 luminance units and a serum dilution of 1:100. The mean P1/N, P2/N, and P3/N ratios are 329.22, 459.03, and 257.82, demonstrating superior performance compared to other conditions.

Embodiment 3 Determination of Positive/Negative Cutoff Value for the LIPS Method in Detecting Porcine GETV

(35) Based on the optimal reaction conditions determined in Embodiment 2, a total of 325 GETV-negative serum samples and 10.sup.6 GETV-positive serum samples were tested under these optimal reaction conditions. Through detection results, ROC curve analysis is performed to obtain a cut-off value of 41.57, with specificity and sensitivity reaching 100%, as demonstrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B.

Embodiment 4 Reproducibility Experiment of the LIPS Detection Method for Porcine GETV

(36) Based on the above determined optimal working conditions of the LIPS detection method, intra-assay and inter-assay reproducibility were evaluated. As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, the coefficients of variation (CV) for both intra-and inter-assay analyses of the LIPS for porcine GETV detection were consistently below 10%, demonstrating excellent reproducibility of this assay.

(37) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Inter-assay reproducibility test results Inter- P/N ratio CV assay Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Average STDEV (%) P1 235.31 249.24 220.63 235.06 14.31 6.09 P2 309.99 324.26 295.05 309.77 14.61 4.72 P3 260.21 274.24 295.44 276.63 17.74 6.41

(38) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Inter-assay reproducibility test results Inter- P/N ratio CV assay Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Average STDEV (%) P1 235.31 249.24 220.63 235.06 14.31 6.09 P2 309.99 324.26 295.05 309.77 14.61 4.72 P3 260.21 274.24 295.44 276.63 17.74 6.41

Embodiment 5 Concordance Experiment of the LIPS Detection Method for Porcine GETV

(39) An indirect immunofluorescence assay, recognized as the gold standard for antibody detection, was utilized to confirm 36 GETV-positive swine serum samples and 10 GETV-negative swine serum samples maintained in the laboratory. These samples were detected using the LIPS detection method for porcine GETV, achieving 100% coincidence between negative and positive samples, and demonstrating that this established LIPS detection method for porcine GETV can be used for clinical detection of GETV antibodies, with certain practical value

Embodiment 6 Specificity Experiment of LIPS Detection Method for Porcine GETV

(40) Using the established LIPS detection method for porcine GETV, comparative analyses were performed on positive serum samples from ASFV, PRRSV, PRV, PCV2, and JEV. As shown in FIG. 5, it can be seen that the kit in this embodiment of the present disclosure demonstrates excellent specificity with no false-positive results detected.

(41) The foregoing is only the specific embodiment in the present disclosure, but the scope of protection of the present disclosure is not limited thereto. Within the technical scope disclosed by the present disclosure, any person skilled in the art may readily think of changes or substitutions, and these changes or substitutions shall be covered within the scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present disclosure shall be subject to the scope of protection of the claims.