SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE CLEANING OF A HIGH-VACUUM CHAMBER
20260081122 ยท 2026-03-19
Inventors
- Larry Tran (South San Francisco, CA, US)
- Vince Carlino (South San Francisco, CA, US)
- George Naugle (Morgan Hill, CA, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A system and a method for an adaptive plasma-cleaning process for a reaction chamber allow continual monitoring by a residual gas analyzer, while active plasma-cleaning is carried out in the reaction chamber. The system includes a valve system and a pump system that allow the residual gas analyzer to perform continual monitoring at a favorable pressure condition that is independent of the active plasma-cleaning process.
Claims
1. A system for adaptively monitor a plasma cleaning process in a reaction chamber, comprising: a plasma generation device configured to provide reactive species into the reaction chamber; a residual gas analyzer; a first vacuum pump configured for reducing pressure in the reaction chamber; a second vacuum pump configured to prevent pressure in the residual gas analyzer from rising above a predetermined value; a valve system selectively configurable to one of two states: (a) a first state, wherein the reaction chamber and the residual gas analyzer are connected by an opening of a first cross section area; and (b) a second state, wherein the reaction chamber and the residual gas analyzer are connected by an opening of a second cross section area that is much greater than the first cross section area; and a controller which operates the first and the second vacuum pumps, the residual gas analyzer; and which (a) (i) activates the plasma generation device, and (ii) sets the valve system to the first state, so as to allow the residual gas analyzer to continually monitor the plasma cleaning process that is enabled by the reactive species introduced into the reaction chamber; and (b)(i) deactivates the plasma generation device; and (ii) sets the valve system to the second state, to allow ascertaining that the plasma cleaning process is substantially complete.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller determines that a measurement by the residual gas analyzer indicates that the reaction chamber has been reduced below a target level of contamination.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the valve system comprises a needle valve and a gate valve, wherein the gate valve is activated only when the valve system is set to the second state.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the reaction chamber includes heaters operable by the controller to allow the reaction chamber to be brought to a pre-determined temperature.
5. The system of claim 1, further comprising a second plasma generation device connected to the reaction chamber.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller comprises an application software running on a computer.
7. A method for controlling a plasma cleaning process in a reaction chamber, comprising: (i) connecting a plasma generation device to provide reactive species into the reaction chamber; (ii) connecting a residual gas analyzer to the reaction chamber through a valve system, the valve system being selectively configurable to one of two states: (a) a first state, wherein the reaction chamber and the residual gas analyzer are connected by an opening of a first cross section area; and (b) a second state, wherein the reaction chamber and the residual gas analyzer are connected by an opening of a second cross section area that is much greater than the first cross section area; (iii) initiating operation of (a) a first vacuum pump, which configured for reducing pressure in the reaction chamber; and (b) a second vacuum pump, the second pump being configured to prevent pressure in the residual gas analyzer from rising above a predetermined value; (iv) making a measurement in the residual gas analyzer; (v) while the measurement in the residual gas analyzer indicates the reaction chamber is above a predetermined acceptable level of contamination: (a) setting the valve system to its first state; and (b) operating the plasma generating device, while monitoring each measurement made by the residual gas analyzer, until the measurement indicates that the reaction chamber is at or below the predetermined acceptable level of contamination; (vi) (a) setting the valve system to its second state; (b) making an additional measurement with the residual gas analyzer; (c) determining whether or not the additional measurement indicates that the reaction chamber remains at or below the predetermined acceptable level of contamination; and (d) repeating steps (iv) and (v) when the additional measurement indicates that the reaction chamber is above the predetermined acceptable level of contamination; and (vii) terminating the cleaning process.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein step (vi) is repeated only up to a predetermined number of times.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the method is carried out under control of a controller.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the controller is implemented by software running on a computer.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein the valve system comprises a needle valve and a gate valve, wherein the gate valve is activated only when the valve system is set to the second state.
12. The method of claim 7 wherein, during operation of the plasma generation device, the reaction chamber is brought to a pre-determined temperature.
13. The method of claim 7, further comprising a second plasma generation device connected to the reaction chamber, and wherein step (v)(b) is carried out with both plasma generation devices operating.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012]
[0013]
[0014] Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings. Although the drawings depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited by the depicted examples. It is to be understood that, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate like structural elements. Also, it is understood that the depictions in the FIGS. are not necessarily to scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0015]
[0016] Prior to entering service, HV chamber 102 is typically plasma-cleaned to reduce undesirable contaminants (e.g., moisture, oils, any organic residues, and lubricants) introduced during HV chamber 102's manufacturing. Such contaminants are believed chemically bonded to the walls of HV chamber 102. As shown in
[0017] In one embodiment, the cleaning operation may be carried out, for example, at a pressure of approximately 1.010.sup.3 torr, and at a baking temperature between 100 C. and 300 C. The temperature may be achieved using heating elements (not shown). Reaction chambers (e.g., HV chamber 102) for semiconductor manufacturing tools are typically wrapped with such heating elements. Although two Ashers are shown in
[0018] A residual gas analyzer (RGA) 107 is connected to HV chamber 102 for detecting contaminants in the effluent gas stream. Typically, RGA 107 operates at a pressure of 1.010.sup.4 torr or lower. As shown in
[0019] The operations of an adaptive or closed loop cleaning process of the present invention can be carried out in system 100 under control of controller 104. Controller 104 may be implemented, for example, by software running on a computer (e.g., a laptop or desktop computer), or by a control circuit configured to control the cleaning process.
[0020] Initially, Ashers 101a and 101b are not operating, and HV chamber 102 and RGA 107, are provided at atmospheric pressure. As shown in
[0021] During step 203, RGA 107 continually monitors the contamination condition in HV chamber 102 through the gas stream brought through needle valve 105, while the cleaning reaction in HV chamber 102 takes its course. Continual monitoring is possible because of the pressure differential across needle valve 105. Eventually (e.g., after 5 hours), RGA 107 detects that the contamination condition in HV chamber 102 has been reduced to below a predetermined acceptable level. When that event occurs, RGA 107's output signal indicates to controller 104 that step 203 is complete. Controller 104 then proceeds to step 204.
[0022] At step 204, controller 104 deactivates both Ashers 101a and 101b and the heaters. Meanwhile, the continued operations of vacuum pump 108 reduces HV chamber 102 to a low pressure (e.g., much lower than 1.010.sup.4 torr). In fact, a successful cleaning (i.e., having significantly reduced ion contaminants) should allow RGA 107 to give substantially the same contamination reading, even when vacuum pump 108 reduces the pressure in HV chamber 102 to 1.010.sup.6 torr or even lower. At step 205, controller 104 opens gate valve 103, which has a significantly larger cross section than needle valve 105, so that the portion of the gas stream introduced into RGA 107 is sampled from an expanded, much larger volume. Opening gate valve 103 also substantially equalizes the pressure between HV chamber 102 and RGA 107.
[0023] Thereafter, at step 206, from the expanded gas stream, RGA 107 measures the contamination condition in HV chamber 102. From this measurement, controller 204 determines whether the contamination level in HV chamber 102 remains at or below the predetermined acceptable level. If so, the cleaning process is complete. At step 208, controller 104 deactivates RGA 107 and vacuum pumps 106 and 108, thereby returning HV chamber 02 back to the initial conditions. Otherwise, i.e., if the contamination level in HV chamber 102 has returned to a level above the predetermined acceptable level, at step 207, controller 104 closes gate valve 103.
[0024] Controller 104 then repeats steps 203-206 until controller 204 determines at repeated step 206 that RGA 107's measurement indicates that the contamination level remains below the predetermined acceptable level. Thus, the cleaning process of the present invention reduces the total cleaning time to substantially only what is necessary.
[0025] In some situations, even after steps 203-206 have been repeated a specified number of times, the goal of achieving a contamination level in HV chamber 102 below the predetermined acceptable level is not achieved (i.e., condition 209). In that event, at step 210, controller 207 informs the user that an exception condition has occurred that requires user intervention.
[0026] The above detailed description is provided to illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting. Numerous variations and modifications within the scope of the present invention are possible. The present invention is set forth in the accompanying claims.