Low Energy Electron-Cooling System and Method
20260089831 ยท 2026-03-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
An adiabatically expanded low energy electron-cooling system and method for increasing the phase space intensity and overall intensity of low energy particle beams, including a vacuum-chamber to allow electron beam and particle beam merging and separation, a cathode to generate the electron beam, a collector to collect the electron beam, magnetic field generation devices including solenoids and toroids to guide the electrons on their desired trajectories, ports to allow particles to enter and leave, neutralizing-background-ions to neutralize electron electric fields, electrodes to accelerate and decelerate the electron beam and an adiabatic-solenoid to enable electron beam expansion. By overlapping the electron and particle beams in an overlap-region, thermal energy is transferred from the particle beam to the electron beam, which allows an increase in the phase space density and overall density of the particle beams.
Claims
1. An electron beam and particle beam system, comprising: an electron beam; a particle beam; neutralizing-background-ions; a vacuum-chamber to allow passage, merging and separation of said electron beam and said particle beam including an overlap-region wherein said electron beam and said particle beam are overlapped and including a first port to allow entrance of said particle beam into said vacuum-chamber and including a second port to allow exit of said particle beam out of said vacuum-chamber; an electron supply device including a cathode to produce said electron beam; an electron collector to collect said electron beam; a first electrode located downstream from said cathode biased at a positive potential with respect to said cathode in order to accelerate said electron beam; a second electrode located downstream from said first electrode and upstream from said overlap-region and biased at a less positive potential than said first electrode to provide a first end of a longitudinal electric potential trap for said neutralizing-background-ions; a magnetic field production device to create magnetic fields to guide said electron beam along a desired path, merge and separate said electron beam and said particle beam, provide radial trapping for said neutralizing-background-ions, and including an adiabatic-solenoid to adiabatically increase the size of said electron beam; a third electrode located downstream from said overlap-region; and a fourth electrode located downstream from said third electrode and biased at a more positive potential than said third electrode to provide a second end of a longitudinal electric potential trap for said neutralizing-background-ions.
2. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said first electrode, said second electrode, said third electrode, and said fourth electrode each include a grid conducting structure to allow passage of said electron beam.
3. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said fourth electrode is said electron collector.
4. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said magnetic field production device includes solenoids and toroids containing wire windings with electric current flowing through the wires.
5. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said magnetic field production device includes permanent magnet material.
6. A system in accordance with claim 1, wherein said magnetic field production device includes solenoids and toroids containing wire windings with electric current flowing through the wires and permanent magnet material.
7. A method of cooling a low energy particle beam with an electron beam while containing neutralizing-background-ions, comprising the steps of: operating a vacuum-chamber to allow passage, merging and separation of said electron beam and said particle beam including an overlap-region wherein said electron beam and said particle beam are overlapped and where a first port allows entrance of said particle beam into said vacuum-chamber and where a second port allows exit of said particle beam out of said vacuum-chamber; operating an electron supply device including a cathode to produce said electron beam; operating an electron collector to collect said electron beam; operating a first electrode located downstream from said cathode biased at a positive potential with respect to said cathode in order to accelerate said electron beam; operating a second electrode located downstream from said first electrode and upstream from said overlap-region and biased at a less positive potential than said first electrode to provide a first end of a longitudinal electric potential trap for said neutralizing-background-ions; operating a magnetic field production device to create magnetic fields to guide said electron beam along a desired path, merge and separate said electron beam and said particle beam, provide radial trapping for said neutralizing-background-ions and including an adiabatic-solenoid to adiabatically increase the size of said electron beam; and operating a third electrode located downstream from said overlap-region; operating a fourth electrode located downstream from said third electrode and biased at a more positive potential than said third electrode to provide a second end of a longitudinal electric potential trap for said neutralizing-background-ions.
8. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein said first electrode, said second electrode, said third electrode, and said fourth electrode each include a grid conducting structure to allow passage of said electron beam.
9. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein said fourth electrode is said electron collector.
10. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein said magnetic field production device includes solenoids and toroids containing wire windings with electric current flowing through the wires.
11. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein said magnetic field production device includes permanent magnet material.
12. A method in accordance with claim 7, wherein said magnetic field production device includes solenoids and toroids containing wire windings with electric current flowing through the wires and permanent magnet material.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the descriptions, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations.
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] While aspects of the subject matter of the present disclosure may be embodied in a variety of forms, the following description and accompanying drawings are merely intended to disclose some of these forms as specific examples of the subject matter. Accordingly, the subject matter of this disclosure is not intended to be limited to the forms or embodiments so described and illustrated.
A First EmbodimentCase One
[0020] An electron-cooling system 10 for increasing the phase space intensity and overall intensity of low energy particle 28 beams is shown in
[0021] The electron cathode 12 can be made of, for example, off the shelf materials standard for contemporary electron 14 sources. The cathode 12 is essentially a hot surface from which electrons 14 are freed. By placing an electrode 18a in front of the cathode 12 an electric field is generated. The magnitude of the electric field is given by the expression:
In equation (1), V is the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the electrode 18a and x is the distance between the cathode 12 and the electrode 18a.
[0022] The amount of electron 14 beam current that is generated by an electron system comprised of an electron cathode 12 and a first electrode 18a is determined by Child's Law
In equation (2), J is the space charge limited current density, V is the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the first electrode 18a, .sub.0=8.85410.sup.12 C.sup.2s.sup.2/(m.sup.3 kg) is the permittivity of free space, d is the separation distance between the cathode 12 and the first electrode 18a, e=1.60210.sup.19 C is the charge on the electron 14 and m.sub.e=9.1110.sup.31 kg is the mass of the electron 14. For a circular cathode 12 area of radius r, I=Jr.sup.2, and hence
[0023] The first embodiment of the invention includes the cooling of particle 28 beams stored in a colliding beam dual storage ring system. Such a dual storage ring system can produce energy by way of fusion reactions and be used as a fusion energy power source. The time required to cool particle 28 beams overlapped by an electron 14 beam is given by the following expression:
[0024] The particle 28 beams used in fusion reactions may have an energy of between 20.0 keV and 5.0 MeV and the particles 28 used may be deuterium, tritium, and He-3. As one example, the deuterium particle 28 energy can be chosen as 247.2 keV and the tritium particle 28 energy chosen as 167.5 keV. For electron-cooling to function, the average velocity of the electron 14 beam should be equal to the average velocity of the particle 28 beam, and for the case of a 247.2 keV deuterium particle 28 beam this means that the electron 14 beam has an energy of 67.3 eV. For the case of a 167.5 keV tritium particle 28 beam this means that the electron 14 beam has an energy of 30.5 eV.
[0025] A first embodiment could involve, for example, a cathode 12 with a 12.7 cm radius and a first electrode 18a positioned 5.0 mm downstream from the cathode 12. For the first embodiment a grid electrode structure shown in
[0026] Consider first the case of a cooler for the tritium particles 28 with an electron 14 beam energy of 30.5 eV. One issue concerning the cooling time given in Eq. (4) is that it is inversely proportional to the electron 14 beam current, I.
[0027] Without some apparatus to neutralize the charge of electron 14 beams, the potential difference between the beam center and the beam edge is given by the following expression:
In the above expression, I is the current of the electron 14 beam in amps and is the average velocity of the electron 14 beam divided by the speed of light. For the case considered here I is 10,000 A and is 0.0109, leading to a beam center to beam edge potential difference of over 27 million volts. Clearly such a large current cannot be sustained, since the beam energy has been specified to be only 30.5 eV. Indeed, were the current to be limited by its own self space charge, the limit would be I=0.0109 A, which is about one million times less than the desired value of 10,000 A. Even more constraining is the condition of the energy spread within the beam. For electron-cooling to work, the electron 14 energies should all be in a range of values, typically within 1% or less of the central electron 14 beam energy. A space charge potential of 0.3 V, leading to an electron 14 beam energy spread of 1% of the 30.5 eV main electron 14 beam energy, would limit the useful electron-cooling current to 0.1 milliamps, 100 million times less than the desired current.
[0028] The present invention uses a second electrode 18b prior to electron 14 beam entry into the toroid 22 that is at the desired potential difference from the cathode 12, while also employing the first electrode 18a prior to the second electrode 18b, where the first electrode 18a is at a more positive potential than the second electrode 18b resulting in an electric field that decelerates the electrons 14 before they enter the toroid 22. This same electric field will cause any positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 present in the system to be reflected back into the cooling region.
[0029] The positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be formed as a result of collisions between the electrons 14 and neutral gas molecules present inside of the vacuum-chamber 16 as the electron 14 beam traverses the system. The positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be formed with an energy of about 1/40.sup.th of an eV, which is the energy of typical room temperature gases and the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will therefore be trapped radially by the toroidal and solenoidal fields. The positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will execute an approximate helical motion around the magnetic field lines with the radius of the helix given by the following expression:
In equation (6) m is the mass of the positive neutralizing-background-ion 30, e is the charge on the positive neutralizing-background-ion 30, B is the magnetic field of the solenoid 20 or toroid 22, and v the velocity of the positive neutralizing-background-ion 30 perpendicular to the magnetic field. For the case of a carbon atom with an energy of 1/40.sup.th of an eV, equation (6) may result in an expected radius of the helical motion of about 2 mm.
[0030] On the collector-side, the present invention uses a third electrode 18c after electron 14 beam exit from the toroid 22 that is at the desired potential difference from the cathode 12, while also employing a fourth electrode 18d downstream from the third electrode 18c, where the third electrode 18c is at a less positive potential than the fourth electrode 18d resulting in an electric field that accelerates the electrons 14 after they leave the third electrode 18c. This same electric field will cause any positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 present in the system to be reflected back into the overlap-region 34. The overlap-region 34 is the region where the particle 28 beam and electron beam 14 are overlapped.
[0031] Therefore, the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be trapped radially by the solenoidal and toroidal fields produced by the solenoids 20 and toroids 22, and the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be trapped longitudinally by the electric fields produced by the electrodes 18a, 18b, 18c and 18d. The combination of longitudinal and radial trapping means that the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 are fully trapped within the overlap-region 34. The buildup of the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will continue until the electron 14 beam is essentially neutralized, allowing for large electron 14 currents.
[0032] Since Eq. (4) stipulates that .sub.cool is inversely proportional to the electron 14 beam current, this effect strongly increases the cooling.
[0033] The present invention will adiabatically decrease the transverse electron 14 velocity v.sub.emax by using an adiabatic-solenoid 32. The adiabatic expansion of the electron 14 beam will experience a reduction ratio in transverse velocity spread equal to the expansion ratio of the beam radius provided that the adiabatic condition holds. The adiabatic condition is that the relative change in the magnetic field dB/B is small during a single cyclotron period, where the cyclotron frequency is defined as:
[0034] For the first embodiment, a magnetic field may be 0.1 T at the beginning of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 and the electron 14 beam may expand from a radius of 12.7 cm at the cathode 12 to 30 cm at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 for an expansion ratio of 2.362. With these values, the magnetic field drops from 0.1 T at the beginning of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 to 0.1 T/2.362=0.0423 T by the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32, and hence the total change in field is B=0.0577 T over the length of the adiabatic-solenoid 32. To evaluate the adiabatic condition of a small dB/B, consider an adiabatic-solenoid 32 with a length of 10 cm and a linear decrease of B, and hence dB/dx=B/L=0.577 T/m over the length of the adiabatic-solenoid 32. It is at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 that both dB/B and T.sub.C=1/f.sub.C are the largest, since B is smallest there. At the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 the cyclotron frequency is 1.18510.sup.9 Hz, corresponding to a period of cyclotron motion of T.sub.C=1/f.sub.C=8.43910.sup.10 s. For case one of the first embodiment, the electron 14 beam average velocity will be v.sub.D=0.0109c=3.26810.sup.6 m/s. Here c is the speed of light. Hence, the electron 14 will move dx=v.sub.DT.sub.C=2.76 mm during one cyclotron period at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 and dB=(dB/dx)dx=0.577 T/m2.7610.sup.3 m=1.5910.sup.3 T, and hence dB/B=1.5910.sup.3 T/0.0423 T=3.7610.sup.2 so dB/B is small throughout the adiabatic-solenoid 32 in this case. Therefore, lengths of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 equal to or greater than 10 cm may be acceptable for a starting field of 0.1 T in this first embodiment.
[0035] Since Eq. (4) stipulates that .sub.cool is proportional to v.sub.emax.sup.3, use of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 to expand the beam, and thereby reducing v.sub.emax, will increase the cooling effectiveness. v.sub.emax is the transverse velocity spread of the electron 14 beam.
[0036] The first embodiment of the present invention combines trapping of neutralizing-background-ions 30 with an adiabatic increase of the electron 14 beam size (which decreases the transverse velocity spread v.sub.emax within the electron 14 beam) in order to maximize the cooling effectiveness within a single system and method. This combination may allow for a significant increase in the cooling.
A First EmbodimentCase Two
[0037] For case two of the first embodiment, one difference from case one of the first embodiment is the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the electrodes 18b and 18c that are nearest to the toroids 22. In the first embodiment, case two, this potential difference may be 67.3 V rather than the 30.5 V specified in the first embodiment, case one. The analysis changes only in a straightforward way that those skilled in the art can determine based on the present invention's description of the first embodiment, case one.
A First EmbodimentGeneral Case
[0038] For the general case of the first embodiment, the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the electrodes 18b and 18c that are nearest to the toroids 22 can be anywhere in a range between 2 V and 1.5 kV. This range comes from the range over which fusion cross sections are highest. The lowest energy of the desired fusion energy range is 20 keV, which is about 10 times less than the energy considered in the First Embodiment, Cases One and Two. Hence, the lowest energy electron 14 beam will be 10 times less than the 30.5 eV used therein, or 3 eV. Since the charge on the electron 14 is e, the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the electrodes 18b and 18c is 3 V in this case. The highest energy of the desired fusion energy range is 5.0 MeV, which is about 20 times larger than the energy considered in the First Embodiment, Cases One and Two. Hence, the largest energy electron 14 beam will be 20 times more than the 67.3 eV used therein, or 1.34 keV. Since the charge on the electron 14 is e, the potential difference between the cathode 12 and the electrodes 18b and 18c is 1.34 kV in this case.
A Second Embodiment
[0039] A second embodiment of the invention includes the cooling of particle 28 beams for a muon collider. Recall Eq. (4) for the time required to cool particle 28 beams overlapped by an electron 14 beam:
[0040] The particle 28 beams envisioned for use in a muon collider will be muons with an energy of between several keV to several TeV depending on the design of that collider. The invention may be useful for the lower range of muon energies (from 1 keV to 1 MeV). As seen in Eq. (4) the cooling time is lower for smaller .sub.beam and for that reason the second embodiment is chosen with .sub.beam=v.sub.beam/c=0.02 and a corresponding electron 14 beam energy of 102.2 eV.
[0041] The second embodiment is shown in
[0042] The cooling time given in Eq. (4) above is inversely proportional to the electron 14 beam current, I.
[0043] Without some apparatus to neutralize the charge of electron 14 beams, the potential difference between the beam center and the beam edge is given by Eq. (5):
In Eq. (5), I is the current of the electron 14 beam and B is the average velocity of the electron 14 beam divided by the speed of light. For the case considered here I is 1,445 A and is 0.02, leading to a beam center to beam edge potential difference of over 2.1 million volts. Clearly such a large current cannot be sustained, since the beam energy has been specified to be only 102.2 eV. Even more constraining is the condition of the energy spread within the beam. For electron-cooling to work, the electron 14 energies should all be in a range of values, typically within 1% or less of the central electron 14 beam energy.
[0044] The present invention uses a second electrode 18b prior to electron 14 beam entry into the first toroid 22 that is at the desired potential difference from the cathode 12, while also employing the first electrode 18a prior to the second electrode 18b, where the first electrode 18a is at a more positive potential than the second electrode 18b resulting in an electric field that decelerates the electrons 14 before they enter the toroid 22. This same electric field will cause any positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 present in the system to be reflected back into the cooling region.
[0045] The positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be formed as a result of collisions between the electrons 14 and neutral gas molecules present inside of the vacuum-chamber 16 as the electron 14 beam traverses the system. The positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be formed with an energy of about 1/40.sup.th of an eV, which is the energy of typical room temperature gases and the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will therefore be trapped radially by the toroidal and solenoidal fields.
[0046] On the collector-side, the present invention uses a third electrode 18c after electron 14 beam exit from the toroid 22 that is at the desired potential difference from the cathode 12, while also employing a fourth electrode 18d downstream from the third electrode 18c, where the third electrode 18c is at a less positive potential than the fourth electrode 18d resulting in an electric field that accelerates the electrons 14 after they leave the third electrode 18c. This same electric field will cause any positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 present in the system to be reflected back into the overlap-region 34.
[0047] Therefore, the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be trapped radially by the solenoidal and toroidal fields produced by the solenoids 20 and toroids 22, and the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will be trapped longitudinally by the electric fields produced by the electrodes 18a, 18b, 18c and 18d. The combination of longitudinal and radial trapping means that the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 are fully trapped within the overlap-region 34. The buildup of the positive neutralizing-background-ions 30 will continue until the electron 14 beam is essentially neutralized, allowing for large electron 14 currents.
[0048] Since Eq. (4) stipulates that .sub.cool is inversely proportional to the electron 14 beam current, this effect strongly decreases the cooling time, which may be beneficial for a muon collider, since muons live for only about two millionths of a second.
[0049] The present invention will adiabatically decrease the transverse electron 14 velocity v.sub.emax by using an adiabatic-solenoid 32. The adiabatic expansion of the electron 14 beam will experience a reduction ratio in transverse velocity spread equal to the expansion ratio of the beam radius provided that the adiabatic condition holds. The adiabatic condition is that the relative change in the magnetic field dB is small compared to the magnetic field B during a single cyclotron period, where the cyclotron frequency is defined above in Eq. (7):
[0050] For the second embodiment, a magnetic field may be, for example, 1 T at the beginning of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 and the electron 14 beam may expand from a radius of 4.8 cm at the cathode 12 to 33.6 cm at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 for an expansion ratio of 7. With these values, the magnetic field drops from 1 T at the beginning of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 to 1 T/7=0.143 T by the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32, and hence the total change in field is B=0.857 T over the length of the adiabatic-solenoid 32. To evaluate the adiabatic condition of a small dB/B, consider an adiabatic-solenoid 32 with a length of 1 m and a linear decrease of B, and hence dB/dx=B/L=0.857 T/m over the length of the adiabatic-solenoid 32. It is at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 that both dB/B and T.sub.C=1/f.sub.C are the largest, since B is smallest there. At the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 the cyclotron frequency is 4.0010.sup.9 Hz, corresponding to a period of cyclotron motion of T.sub.C=1/f.sub.C=2.5010.sup.10 s. For the second embodiment, the electron 14 beam average velocity will be v.sub.muon=0.02c=6.0010.sup.6 m/s. Here c is the speed of light. Hence, the electron 14 will move dx=v.sub.muon T.sub.C=1.5 mm during one cyclotron period at the end of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 and dB=(dB/dx)dx=(0.857 T/m)1.510.sup.3 m=1.2910.sup.3 T, and hence dB/B=1.2910.sup.3 T/0.143 T=9.0010.sup.3 so dB/B is small throughout the adiabatic-solenoid 32 in this case. Therefore, lengths of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 equal to or greater than 1 m may be acceptable for a starting field of 1 T in this second embodiment.
[0051] Since Eq. (4) stipulates that .sub.cool is proportional to v.sub.emax.sup.3, use of the adiabatic-solenoid 32 to expand the beam, and thereby reducing v.sub.emax, will increase the cooling effectiveness. v.sub.emax is the transverse velocity spread of the electron 14 beam.
[0052] The second embodiment of the present invention combines trapping of neutralizing-background-ions 30 with an adiabatic increase of the electron 14 beam size (which decreases the velocity spread v.sub.emax within the electron 14 beam) in order to maximize the cooling effectiveness within a single system and method. This combination may allow for a significant increase in the cooling.
Other Embodiments
[0053] The above sections have described certain illustrative embodiments of the invention. It should be noted here that other embodiments may include electrodes 18 that have different geometries for allowing beam passage, such as hexagonal or irregularly spaced grid wires or parallel wires only to replace the grid structure shown in
[0054] Further, it is possible that the collector 24 itself could be used as the fourth electrode 18d, since the collector 24 could be biased positively with respect to the vacuum-chamber 16 surrounding the overlap-region 34 to provide the necessary fields to trap the neutralizing-background-ions 30. Employing a separate fourth electrode 18d along with additional collector-side electrodes 18 allows energy recovery from the electron 14 beam, and biasing the collector 24 even more positively than the vacuum-chamber 16 surrounding the overlap-region 34 may result in an even more energetic beam impinging upon the collector 24, but it would serve as one end of a longitudinal trap for the neutralizing-background-ions 30. Using electrodes 18 in the collector 24 to allow energy recovery from the electron 14 beam is one exemplary approach.
[0055] While the subject matter of this disclosure has been described and shown in considerable detail with reference to certain illustrative embodiments, including various combinations and sub-combinations of features, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate other embodiments and variations and modifications thereof as encompassed within the scope of the present disclosure. Moreover, the descriptions of such embodiments, combinations, and sub-combinations are not intended to convey that the claimed subject matter requires features or combinations of features other than those expressly recited in the claims. Accordingly, the scope of this disclosure is intended to include all modifications and variations encompassed within the spirit and scope of the following appended claims.