ROTOR CONSTRUCTION FOR WIND TURBINE GENERATORS
20260095082 ยท 2026-04-02
Inventors
- Randall W. Russell (Kennewick, WA, US)
- Jan H. de Swardt (Eustis, FL, US)
- Luke D. Koljonen (North Canton, OH, US)
- James G. Wilson (Prosser, WA, US)
- Nathaniel Z.N. Glessner (Pasco, WA, US)
Cpc classification
H02K15/50
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H02K15/50
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Rotors and stators for use in electric machines and methods for refurbishing the same. One method for refurbishing a stator for use in an electric machine includes at least partially disassembling the stator to provide access to a plurality of stator windings connected in a four-circuit delta connection having three and four turns per coil, and reconfiguring the stator such that the plurality of stator windings are connected in an eight-circuit delta connection having seven turns per coil. One method for refurbishing a rotor for use in an electric machine includes at least partially disassembling the rotor to provide access to a rotor core, the rotor core including first rotor bars, and reconfiguring the rotor core to include second rotor bars that are longer than the first rotor bars.
Claims
1. A method for refurbishing a rotor for use in an electric machine, the method comprising: at least partially disassembling the rotor to provide access to a rotor core, the rotor core including first rotor bars extending towards a fan, wherein the first rotor bars and the fan are separated by a gap; and reconfiguring the rotor core to include second rotor bars that are longer than the first rotor bars.
2. The method of claim 1, where the air gap between the end of the bars and the fan is between 0.3 and 0.5 inches.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising cutting the second rotor bars using a grinding disk prior to reconfiguring the rotor core to include the second rotor bars.
4. A method for refurbishing a rotor for use in an electric machine, the method comprising: at least partially disassembling the rotor to provide access to a rotor core; fitting rotor bars into the rotor core; and wrapping an overhang portion of the rotor core using a woven glass mat around the circumference of the rotor, the woven glass mat including a radially projecting end flange.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein wrapping the overhang portion of the rotor core includes wrapping at least 90 layers of banding tape around the woven glass mat.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the woven glass mat extends to between 16/64 and 4/64 of an inch of the end of the rotor bars.
7. The method of claim 4, further comprising: removing a balancing disk from the rotor, the balancing disk including a plurality of tabs; removing the plurality of tabs from the balancing disk; and replacing the balancing disk onto the rotor.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein removing the plurality of tabs from the balancing disk includes grinding the plurality of tabs.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein removing the plurality of tabs from the balancing disk includes cutting off a radially outer perimeter portion of the balancing disk.
10. A rotor for an electric machine, the rotor comprising: a plurality of rotor slots, each rotor slot configured to receive a plurality of rotor bars, wherein the plurality of rotor bars include a first pair of rotor bars and a second pair of rotor bars, wherein the rotor bars in each pair of rotor bars have a different cross section profile, wherein the pairs of rotor bars are staggered, and wherein the plurality of rotor bars are copper bars.
11. The rotor of claim 10, wherein the plurality of rotor bars includes a third pair of rotor bars.
12. The rotor of claim 10, wherein the plurality of rotor bars are split with a minimum overlap of at least inch.
13. The rotor of claim 10, wherein the plurality of rotor slots includes 84 slots.
14. A method for refurbishing a rotor for use in an electric machine, the method comprising: at least partially disassembling the rotor to provide access to a rotor core, the rotor core including rotor bars manufactured from an electrically conductive material, wherein the rotor bars are insulated from the rotor core with an insulation material of composites of aramid and polyimide film.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the plurality of rotor windings are high conductivity copper windings.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein the thickness of the insulation material is at least 10 mil.
17. The method of claim 14, further comprising: reconfiguring pairs of the rotor bars such that each pair of rotor bars have a different cross section profile, wherein the pairs of rotor bars are staggered.
18. The method of claim 14, further comprising: providing the rotor with a tab-less balancing disk.
19. The method of claim 14, further comprising: wrapping an overhang portion of the rotor core using a woven glass mat around the circumference of the rotor, the woven glass mat including a radially projecting end flange.
20. The method of claim 14, wherein the rotor includes 84 rotor slots.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055] Other aspects of the embodiments described herein will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0056] Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
[0057] Stators described herein may be implemented in a wind turbine generator that has respective power and voltage ratings of 660 kilowatts (kW) and 690 volts (V). However, it should be understood that description herein of the flaws and proposed improvements to the design of the original stator may also be applicable to stator designs implemented in wind turbine generators having other electrical ratings. For example, the designs and methods for constructing, installing, and/or refurbishing wound rotors described herein may also be applicable to generators/motors rated to 600-800 KW, 525-700V, 50-60 Hertz (Hz), and a synchronous speed of 1000-2000 rotations per minute (rpm). In some instances, the designs and methods for constructing, installing, and/or refurbishing stators described herein are applicable to generators/motors with different electrical ratings not explicitly described herein.
[0058] As will be described in more detail below, failure of one or more of the components included in the original machine may be attributed to deficiencies in the designs, methods, and/or materials used to construct, install, and/or refurbish the original machine. As one example, current stator slot liner and insulation is unsatisfactory, as stators experience damage from high voltage and temperatures. As another example, rotors experience overheating damage due to poor air circulation and collapsing of rotor bars.
[0059] Table 1 provides a modelled performance of a wind turbine generator implementing an original stator, including eddy and circulating current losses resulting from the specific design parameters of the original stator.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Modelled Performance of Original Machine Design Original Description Design Unit Winding Turns per coil 3 & 4 turns Configuration Conductors 11x AWG 16 and 17x AWG 17 Output Power 660 kW Losses at Stator Conductor I.sup.2R 4.707 kW Full Load Additional Eddy 6% and Circulating 0.267 kW Current Losses Total 4.974 kW
[0060] Additionally, Table 2 provides modelled flux densities of a wind turbine generator implementing the original stator and rotor.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Modelled Flux Densities of Original Machine Design Description Original Design Unit Stator Core 1.348 T 86993 lines/in.sup.2 Teeth 1.218 T 78548 lines/in.sup.2 Rotor Core 0.752 T 48529 lines/in.sup.2 Teeth 1.112 T 71748 lines/in.sup.2
[0061] Typically, wind turbine generators of this size can achieve flux densities up to 1.6 T (or 103226 lines/in.sup.2). Embodiments described herein replace components of original stators and rotors that may have experienced failure with new components or in new configurations that reduce total losses and change flux density.
Stator Replacement
[0062] Overheating of stator windings result in long term insulation degradation, discoloration, and thermal stress issues due to high losses and/or insufficient cooling.
[0063] The original stator winding is a four-circuit delta connection winding with three and four turns per coil. The stator consists of 96 stator slots, and thus with the 4 circuit delta connections, consist of 12 groups of 8 coils each for the entire winding. Each phase thus consists of (12/3 phases=) 4 groups of 8 coils per phase. However, these 8 coils per group are not uniform. Rather, the coils alternate between 3 turns per coil 302 and 4 turns per coil 304 connected at top-to-bottom connections 306, as represented in
[0064] The stator winding has significant stator copper losses as a result of eddy and circulating currents (as calculated in Table 1). As the stator winding has less than five turns per coil, the stator winding has decreased efficiency, increased winding temperature, reduced insulation life, and reduced wind generator power output. As shown below in Table 3, at least three different stator winding configurations were uncovered in existing stators.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Winding Design Configuration Comparison Description Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Unit Winding Turns per coil 3 & 4 4 3 & 4 turns Configuration Conductors 11x AWG16 and 10x AWG16 and 17x AWG 15 and 17x AWG17 14x AWG 15 9x AWG 16 Calculated Slot 42% 54% 52% Fill Factor Current density 2.78 2.15 2.23 A/mm.sup.2
[0065] In the first pre-existing design (Design 1), the calculated slot fill factor is in the slightly lower than the normal expected range of 43 to 49% and indicates to a winding that has a relatively empty slot fill, but probably suitable for automated machine winding. The calculated stator core flux densities have already been shown in, in Table 2 for the 3 and 4 turns per coil winding configuration. Design 2 was deemed erroneous as it did not meet the rating plate performance. Design 3 uses the turn configuration of 3 & 4 turns per coil, but with different wire sizes than Design 1. The slot fill factor is unusually high at 52%, which would make practical winding of the coils into the slot extremely difficult. The fit of the coils into the slot, was found the be extremely tight, and would not be practical unless the insulation thickness is significantly reduced. This winding configuration will force a compromise on the stator slot and conductor insulation, which may result in electrical failures, thereby reducing the generator reliability, perhaps to mean time between failures of less than 7 years, as reported by the end user.
[0066] As previously identified, reducing losses, thus including the stator conductor losses would be desirable, since it would reduce the overall heating of the generator, resulting in increased insulation life and reliability. The increase in conductor area needs to however be practical without compromising the slot and conductor insulation. In the improvement of the present disclosure, the stator conductor size is increased, while still maintaining sufficient space for suitable conductor and slot insulation. This design is compared to the pre-existing design configurations in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Winding Design Configuration Comparison Description Design 1 Design 3 New Design Unit Winding Turns per coil 3 & 4 3 & 4 3 & 4 turns Configuration Conductors 11x AWG16 and 17x AWG 15 and 28x AWG 16 17x AWG17 9x AWG 16 Calculated Slot 42% 52% 48% Fill Factor Current density 2.78 2.23 2.43 A/mm.sup.2
[0067] The stator conductor losses are compared against Design 1 in Table 5.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 New Winding Design Stator Conductor Losses Comparison Description Design 1 New Design Unit Winding Turns 3 & 4 3 & 4 Turns Configuration per coil Conductors 11x AWG16 and 28x AWG 17x AWG 17 Losses at Stator Conductor 4.707 3.845 kW Full Load I.sup.2R
[0068] The design improvement reduces the stator contactor losses by 18.3%, which reduces the total generator losses and temperature rise and results in an increase in generator efficiency. Additionally, as only one conductor size is used, stock levels are reduced and winding manufacturing times are reduced. The improvements are achieved without compromising on the insulation that would result in reduced reliability.
[0069] As previously noted, the stator winding of previous designs is a four-circuit delta connection with 3 and 4 turns per coil. The additional eddy and circulating current losses associated with the stator winding of previous designs, as calculated in Table 1, result in 6% of additional stator losses. These losses result in increased overall losses, decreased efficiency, increased winding temperature, and reduced generator power output.
[0070] The eddy and circulating current losses may be reduced by increasing the number of turns per coils and/or adding transpositions into the winding. For example, as shown in
[0071] Replacing the stator winding connection with an eight-circuit delta connection increases the coil voltage from 82.4V per coil to 164.8V per coil. Accordingly, further insulation may be provided throughout the stator to account for the increase in voltage.
[0072] The insulation of conductors in previous stator windings is insufficient for even 82.4 V per coil, resulting in inter-turn failure and reduced generator life. Traditionally, conductor covering is selected based on the volt per turn. The calculated volt per turn for the previous stator is only 27.5 V, which is sufficient for as-stripped conductor insulation. However, since the original as well as the replacement stator design is a mush winding (e.g., random wound), it is not possible to guarantee that each turn is only adjacent to the subsequent turn, unless each turn is continuously wrapped in the respective slot (which is not possible due to slot opening size and available space for the insulation).
[0073] Example replacement stators described herein include upgraded conductor insulation to reduce inter-turn failures and increase reliability and life. For example, the conductors are upgraded to high conductivity, fully annealed (to increase conductivity, reduce losses and windability) copper with quad film insulation. The quad film insulation is capable of insulating these high voltages, reducing inter-turn failures and increasing reliability and life expectancy. Quad film wire is, for example, MW 35 Quad or MW 36 Quad as defined in the U.S. Standard NEMA MW 1000, where quad refers to the thickness of the coating on the wire.
[0074] Voltage stresses on the insulation between the conductors in the slot and the laminated core may increase the risk of a failure in the slot, which could cause significant damage to the core. When replacing the original stator, an aramid paper, polyimide film, aramid paper composite (for example, NKN 3-3-3) slot liner 300 may be added to the stator slots, shown in
[0075] Additionally, coil insulation between the top and bottom coils may be upgraded to an aramid paper, polyimide film, aramid paper composite (for example, NKN 5-5-5) slot liner 310 (for example, a coil separator), as shown in
[0076] The stator coil-to-coil insulation in original stators, shown in
[0077] The winding configuration implemented by original stators, as previously described, increases the risk of inter-phase failure on the overhang. When replacing the stators, the replacement stator winding may be wound with phase-to-phase separators 1000, shown in
[0078] Replacement stators described herein experience an increased voltage withstand of each part of the insulation compared to previous stators, as shown below in Table 6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Voltage Withstand Comparison Original Replacement Withstand Withstand Conductor Insulation 5700 V 10170 V Coil Separator Insulation 2300 V 19000 V Slot Insulation 4520 V 19000 V Inter-Coil Insulation 5700 V 40670 V Inter-Phase Insulation 11400 V 41770 V
Rotor Replacement
[0079] Rotors also experience overheating, as shown in
[0080] As shown in
[0081] However, traditional manufacturing methods cut the rotor bars to length before they are wound into the rotor. If the rotor bars are too long, the overhang will touch the fan, creating a short circuit. Accordingly, manufacturers typically err on the side of caution, resulting in a large clearance gap and, therefore, a large leakage path for the air between the overhang end and the fan. As the length of rotor bars needs to be accurate to avoid the large clearance gap, manufacturing time of the rotor bars may be increased, as well as the time to wind them into the rotor.
[0082] Examples described herein replace the original rotor bars with longer rotor bars that are wound into the rotor core, shown in
[0083] After winding and blocking, but prior to brazing the connections, overhang length may be measured and cut to the exact required length by mounting the rotor in a lathe and cutting the bars using a grinding disk. An example of cutting the bars is shown in
[0084] Manufacturing using the longer rotor bars that are wound into the rotor core and cut after winding and blocking reduces manufacturing times and rotor winding time while also controlling the distance between the end of the rotor overhang and the fan inlet. The reduced clearance 1600, shown in
[0085] Additionally, on the opposite connection end of the rotor where the internal shaft mounted fan is fitted,
[0086] Accordingly, during replacement of the rotor and before the rotor banding is applied, a woven glass mat 1900 may be wrapped around the radial outer perimeter (e.g., circumference) of the rotor. The woven glass mat 1900 may have a protuberant edge 1900 (e.g., radially projecting end flange) for the overhang banding tape to be wound up to and against. The protuberant edge 1900 assists with the overhang being covered to as close as practically possible (e.g., between 0.0625 in. and 0.250 in., or between 0.0625 in. and 0.125 in., such as 0.078 in.) to the edge of the overhang, shown in
[0087] As shown in
[0088] In replacement rotors described herein, balancing of the rotor may instead be achieved by bolting balancing weights directly on the surface of the balancing disk itself, without using tabs. For example, as shown in
[0089] The original rotor winding consists of wave wound rotor bars, two conductors per slot, equally split into two (100 by 400 millimeter) copper bars 2300, as shown in
[0090] As wind generators may operate with a wide range of operating speed and high frequency voltages, the collapsed stack may result in eddy current losses in the rotor winding due to deep bar and skin effect. Additionally, for some machines, the individual bars are insulated from each other to achieve a reduction in eddy currents.
[0091] Accordingly, in replacement rotors, the four copper rotor bars may be combined into a single copper bar, eliminating the possible collapsing of the stack. Using a single copper bar increases the available space for turn and slot insulation. However, in some instances, the mechanical strength of the single rotor bar is less than a split bar. Additionally, as shown in
[0092] Accordingly, in another example replacement rotor, the rotor bars may be split into two (or more) conductors 2700, split in the width, as shown in
[0093] In yet another example replacement rotor, rotor bars of different conductor sizes (e.g., different cross section profiles) may be staggered, as shown in
[0094] For wind generators and other machines, the rotor voltage may be very high (e.g., greater than 1000 V). While this reduces the rotor current and the required size of conductors, the voltage stresses the insulation between the conductors in the slot and the laminated core has an increased risk of a failure in the slot. Accordingly, the rotor slot insulation in the replacement rotor may be an aramid paper, polyimide film, aramid paper composite slot liner (for example, NKN 3-3-3) that provides voltage withstand up to 19,000 V and provides protection from sharp edges and protrusions from the laminated core and slots. The slot liner may be, for example, 10 mil thick.
[0095] Embodiments of repairing and/or replacing a stator and/or a rotor for a wind generator described herein provide particular improvements on the reliability and lifespan of the stator and rotor while also achieving improvements in performance. Stators described herein include a slot fill that uses a total conductor area of between 43% to 49% of the available slot size. Table 7 provides a performance comparison between the original machine (e.g., Design 1) and the machine stator.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Comparison between Original Machine Design and Replacement Machine Design Original Improved % Description Design Design Unit Change Output Power 660 660 kW Losses Stator Conductor I.sup.2R 4.707 3.845 W 18.30% at Full Additional Eddy and 6.00% 6.00% Load Circulating Current Losses 0.267 0.231 W 13.59% Total 4.974 4.076 W 18.05%
[0096] The designs and methods for constructing, installing, and/or refurbishing stators and rotors according to the present disclosure are particularly suitable for use in wind turbine generator applications. While examples described herein primarily refer to refurbishing stators and rotors, the features of rotors and stators described herein may also be utilized in the construction and manufacturing of new rotors and stators.
[0097] Various features and advantages of the aspects described herein are set forth in the following claims.