COUNTER UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM WITH NAVIGATION DATA TO INTERCEPT AND/OR DISABLE AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE THREAT
20260093026 ยท 2026-04-02
Inventors
- Dwaine A. Parker (Naples, FL, US)
- Damon E. Stern (Riverview, FL, US)
- Lawrence S. Pierce (Huntsville, AL, US)
Cpc classification
G01S13/88
PHYSICS
G01S7/021
PHYSICS
B64U2201/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G01S13/86
PHYSICS
G08G5/59
PHYSICS
F41H13/0075
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B64U2101/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G01S3/782
PHYSICS
G08G5/26
PHYSICS
F41H11/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F41H11/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41H13/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
G01S13/42
PHYSICS
G01S13/86
PHYSICS
G01S13/88
PHYSICS
G01S3/782
PHYSICS
G01S7/41
PHYSICS
G05D1/00
PHYSICS
G08G5/26
PHYSICS
Abstract
A system for providing integrated detection and countermeasures against unmanned aerial vehicles include a detecting element, a location determining element and an interdiction element. The detecting element detects an unmanned aerial vehicle in flight in the region of, or approaching, a property, place, event or very important person. The location determining element determines the exact location of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The interdiction element can either direct the unmanned aerial vehicle away from the property, place, event or very important person in a non-destructive manner, or can cause disable the unmanned aerial vehicle in a destructive manner.
Claims
1. A system for interdicting an unmanned aerial system, comprising: a first sensor comprising a radio frequency (RF) receiver configured to detect radio frequency signals communicated between said unmanned aerial system and a remote control device; a second sensor comprising a radio frequency (RF) receiver configured to detect radio frequency signals communicated between said unmanned aerial system and said remote control device; and one or more processors coupled to the first sensor and to the second sensor, said one or more processors configured to determine at least one of: an identification of said unmanned aerial system, a vendor of said unmanned aerial system, a model designation of said unmanned aerial system, a serial number of said unmanned aerial system, an identity of the pilot of said unmanned aerial system, a location of said unmanned aerial system, or a direction of flight of said unmanned aerial system; and said one or more processors configured to, based on at least one of an identification of said unmanned aerial system, a vendor of said unmanned aerial system, a model designation of said unmanned aerial system, a serial number of said unmanned aerial system, an identity of the pilot of said unmanned aerial system, a location of said unmanned aerial system, or a direction of flight of said unmanned aerial system, initiate action to interdict said unmanned aerial system.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to disrupt at least a portion of communication between the unmanned aerial system and the remote control device used to control the unmanned aerial system.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to take over or alter at least a portion of the communication between the unmanned aerial system and the remote control device used to control the unmanned aerial system.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to force a landing of the unmanned aerial system.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to alter the flight path of the unmanned aerial system.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises intercepting global positioning system (GPS) data being downlinked from the unmanned aerial system to a remote control device and employing that data to modify the mission being executed by the unmanned aerial system.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises a kinetic weapon directed toward the unmanned aerial system.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises a directed energy weapon directed toward the unmanned aerial system.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises directing law enforcement to the remote control device location of the unmanned aerial system.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein said unmanned aerial system has a mass of less than 25 kilograms.
11. A method for interdicting an unmanned aerial system, comprising: detecting radio frequency signals communicated between said unmanned aerial system and a remote control device with a first radio frequency (RF) sensor; detecting radio frequency signals communicated between said unmanned aerial system and a remote control device with a second radio frequency (RF) sensor; employing one or more processors coupled to the first radio frequency (RF) sensor and to the second radio frequency (RF) sensor, said one or more processors configured to: determining at least one of an identification of said unmanned aerial system, a location of said unmanned aerial system, or a direction of flight of said unmanned aerial system; and based on at least one of unmanned aerial system identification, unmanned aerial system location, or unmanned aerial system direction of flight initiating action to interdict said unmanned aerial system.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to disrupt at least a portion of communication between the unmanned aerial method and the remote control device used to control the unmanned aerial system.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to take over or alter at least a portion of the communication between the unmanned aerial method and the remote control device used to control the unmanned aerial system.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to force a landing of the unmanned aerial system.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises transmitting an electronic counter-measure (ECM) signal to alter the flight path of the unmanned aerial system.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises intercepting global positioning method (GPS) data being downlinked from the unmanned aerial method to a remote control device and employing that data to modify the mission being executed by the unmanned aerial system.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises a kinetic weapon directed toward the unmanned aerial system.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises a directed energy weapon directed toward the unmanned aerial system.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein said action to interdict said unmanned aerial system comprises directing law enforcement to the remote control device location of the unmanned aerial system.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein said unmanned aerial system has a mass of less than 25 kilograms.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007]
[0008]
[0009]
[0010]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Part Numbers
[0011] 10 Transmitting multi band high gain directional antenna array with vertical polarity [0012] 12 Receive directional antenna array [0013] 14 Receive Omni antenna array [0014] 16 EO/IR (Electro Optical/Infra Red) sensor [0015] 18 Automatic antenna alignment assembly [0016] 20 Multi-band LNA assembly [0017] 22 Automatic antenna alignment assembly [0018] 24 High fidelity RF receivers/host work station CPU [0019] 26 Azimuth and elevation vector coordinate data processor [0020] 28 Empower 1189-BBM3 wideband HPA assembly [0021] 30 Receive blanking [0022] 32 Direction detect and range estimation [0023] 34 Key sight N9310A RF signal generator with multiple modulation sources [0024] 36 Spectral signals detect and type identification [0025] 38 ECM modulation type select [0026] 40 Frequency and waveform parameters [0027] 42 Modulation database [0028] 43 Commercial 4k X band radar [0029] 44 Subject UAS (Unmanned Aerial System) [0030] 45 Radar clutter and target filter processor [0031] 46 Azimuth and elevation vector coordinate data processor [0032] 99 System power and status monitor [0033] 100 Entire system [0034] 102 Countermeasure and deterrent section of entire system [0035] 103 Radio Frequency (RF) detection section of entire system [0036] 104 Radar detection section of entire system [0037] 105 Electro Optical and Infer Red (EO/IR) detection section of entire system
Glossary
[0038] As used herein and in the claims each of the terms defined in this glossary is understood to have the meaning set forth in this glossary. [0039] Algorithma process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations by a computer [0040] Automatic Antenna Alignment Assemblydesignated as 18 in
[0098] Referring to
[0099] A second function of the system is providing countermeasures against SUAS that is determined to be a threat in or approaching the vicinity of a property, place, event or VIP. Azimuthal data for a sUAS is determined by the detection section 103-105 of the system. The system's control software/hardware provides this information to the integrated Electro-Optical (EO) and Infrared (IR) sensor 16 which autonomously centers the field of regard of the EO/IR sensor to the known location of the subject sUAS 44.
[0100] When the visual identification is confirmed to be a sUAS; by either video analytics or human verification, the system of software/hardware will then determine the precise x, y, z coordinates (x=longitude, y=latitude, z=altitude) of the sUAS. This precise location and range information is provided to the countermeasure and deterrent section 102 of the system 100. Using this data the countermeasure and deterrent section 102 computes the RF spectral characteristics that will nullify signals that the sUAS expects to receive. A signal generator 34 produces a tailored signal and a variable strength amplifier 28 generates the output power required; causing the desired effect at the desired range to the subject sUAS 44. The countermeasure and deterrent section 102 broadcasts the unique generated RF waveform using highly directional and focused antennae 10. The system uses Blanking 30 at the time between the last radio transmitting signal and the beginning of the next radio-transmitting signal of the transmitted signal in accordance with the frequency and waveform parameters 40 to avoid negative internal effects to system 103. The system then disables the sUAS sensors, or causes the sUAS navigation system to malfunction due to communication interference causing most sUAS to enter a Fail Safe Mode (either land immediately or return to the launch point). This action is sUAS specific and is based on the manufacturer design and sUAS operational capabilities.
[0101] The interdict element of a system interdicts the operation of an sUAS initially in a non-destructive manner, increasing to a destructive manner based on the response of the target sUAS. A system may interdict the operation of a sUAS in a non-destructive manner by transmitting a concentrated Radio Frequency (RF) emission tuned to the specific sUAS characteristics identified by the spectral analysis during the detection process. These RF waveforms are then used to disrupt the expected inputs to the onboard controller of the identified sUAS. The video downlink signal is the initial target of the interdiction process. If this interruption is not sufficient to deter the sUAS, the RF transmitter will be tuned to the appropriate control frequency to disrupt the sUAS on-board electronics. These actions will cause most sUAS to enter the Fail Safe Mode (either land immediately or return to the launch point). The technology herein considers the differences based on the manufacturer design and operational capabilities of the SUAS on a case-by-case basis and tailors the countermeasure/deterrent response accordingly.
[0102] The countermeasure and deterrent section 102 of the system 100 interdicts the operation of an sUAS in a non-destructive manner by using the non-destructive technology described to generate a interdict transmission signal that is significantly stronger than control signals from an operator of the sUAS. This interdict transmission will have significantly higher gain (Stronger Signal) and target both the sensor and the control electronics of the sUAS. The interdiction process may be augmented with electro-magnetic pulse technology, pulsed laser and is specifically designed to accept other current or future counter-measures used to defeat the sUAS electronics, motors and or navigation systems. The effects of the higher gain radio transmission will cause amongst other effects, servo-chatter, resulting in the loss of control of the sUAS and disruption of most on-board electronic processes increasing the probability of a forced landing. In addition, a counter sUAS can be dispatched with autonomous navigation data being supplied by the system to locate and intentionally disable the opposing sUAS by flying into it, dropping a net on the threat, covering it with spray foam or liquid or capturing the opposing sUAS.
[0103] The system will use direction finding (DF) equipment 12, 16 to search for the radio communications link of an airborne sUAS 44, commonly referred to as a drone. Integrating multiple Direction Finding (DF) equipment 26, 46 to the system will increase the precision in obtaining the azimuth that the sUAS is flying. Integrating radar equipment 43 provided with a radar clutter and target filter processor 45, with the direction finding (DF) equipment will provide the ability to determine with greater accuracy the altitude and azimuth of the SUAS 44 at the time of discovery and during the time it remains within the systems detection boundaries.
[0104] When the DF equipment 26, 46 has detected a communication link of a sUAS within the system boundaries, the receive host workstation 24 will analyze the radio frequency wave signature and confirm that the RF detected is from a SUAS. This process also applies when a radar unit 43 is integrated with the DF equipment.
[0105] The information obtained from DF 26, 46 and or radar unit 43 is then sent to the direction detect and range estimation unit 32 where algorithms will be used to send SUAS location coordinates to the Automatic Antenna Alignment Assembly (A4) 22, 18.
[0106] Put another way, using Slew To Cue, the autonomous actions of electronic, radio or optical sensors to rotate using an automatic antenna alignment assembly 18, 22 to move and point cameras 16 and countermeasures in the direction of a suspect target 44 based on input from data processed by the azimuth and elevation unit 26 46, thus, keeping the cued targets in view at all times with or without human intervention. This information will then direct the Automatic Antenna Alignment Assembly (A4) 22 to point the Electro-Optical and Laser Range Finding unit 16 at the sUAS to allow for visual confirmation, distance and elevation of the sUAS to be known.
[0107] The information obtained by the Laser Range Finding equipment will be sent to the Azimuth and Elevation Vector Coordinate Data unit 26 which will send exact azimuth and elevation information to the A4 system 18 controlling the Matrix Directional Transmit Antenna Array 10 via the Direction Detect and Range Estimation unit 32.
[0108] When the communications link between the subject sUAS and its' operator is detected by the Radio Frequency (RF) detection section 103 of the system the information is passed through the Multiband LNA Assembly 20 and through the Uplink Receive Host Workstation 24. The information is then sent to the Spectral Signal Detect and Type Identification unit 36 where the type of sUAS is determined based on a known database containing Spectral Signal Wave information 36. When the Spectral Signal Wave information is known the information is sent to the Frequency and Wave Form Parameters unit 40 where the analyzed RF data is sent to the Modulation Look Up Table 42. When the Modulation information is known the information is then sent to the ECM Modulation Type Select unit 38.
[0109] The selected modulation waveform is then sent to the Uplink Video Transmitter Assembly 28 that unit works in conjunction with the Receive Blanking unit 30. When the Uplink Video Transmitter 28 is transmitting a radio signal the Receive Blanking unit 30 will force the DF antennae 12, 14 to stop receiving the radio frequency being transmitted by the Matrix Directional Transmit Antenna Array 10. The radio frequency selected to disrupt the communication link of the sUAS with its' operator is then transmitted by the Transmitter Assembly 28 using the Matrix Directional Transmit Antenna Array 10 aimed at the sUAS 44 via the Automatic Antenna Alignment Assembly 18.
[0110] While the invention has been described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments, obvious modifications and alterations are possible by those skilled in the related art. Therefore, it is intended that the invention include all such modifications and alterations to the full extent that they come within the scope of the following claims or the equivalents thereof.