NON-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET

Abstract

This non-oriented electrical steel sheet includes a steel sheet, in which the steel sheet contains, as a chemical composition, in % by mass, C: 0.0030% or less, Si: 1.0 to 3.5%, Al: 0.10 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.1 to 2.0%, P: 0.20% or less, S: 0.0030% or less, N: 0.0030% or less, Ti: 0.0030% or less, B: 0.0020% or less, Sn: 0 to 0.200%, Sb: 0 to 0.1000%, and a remainder: Fe and impurities, when a Sn content is represented by [Sn] and an Sb content is represented by [Sb] in % by mass, [Sn]+2[Sb]0.200 is satisfied, and when a sheet width of the steel sheet is represented by W, WH/WL, which is a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of iron loss W10/400 at a W/10 part which is a part at a W/10 position, a W/4 part which is a part at a W/4 position, and a W/2 part which is a part at a W/2 position of the sheet width from an end portion in a width direction, is 1.10 or less.

Claims

1. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet comprising a steel sheet, wherein the steel sheet contains, as a chemical composition, in % by mass, C: 0.0030% or less, Si: 1.0 to 3.5%, Al: 0.10 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.1 to 2.0%, P: 0.20% or less, S: 0.0030% or less, N: 0.0030% or less, Ti: 0.0030% or less, B: 0.0020% or less, Sn: 0 to 0.200%, Sb: 0 to 0.1000%, and a remainder: Fe and impurities, when a Sn content is represented by [Sn] and an Sb content is represented by [Sb] in % by mass, the following formula (1) is satisfied, and when a sheet width of the steel sheet is represented by W, WH/WL, which is a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of iron loss W10/400 at a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part which are a part at a W/10 position, a part at a W/4 position, and a part at a W/2 position of the sheet width from an end portion in a width direction respectively, is 1.10 or less, $\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Sn}\right]+2\left[\mathrm{Sb}\right]0.2.& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

2. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the [Sn] and the [Sb] satisfy the following formula (2), $\begin{array}{cc}0.02\left[\mathrm{Sn}\right]+2\left[\mathrm{Sb}\right]0.2.& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

3. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein an insulating coating is formed on a surface of the steel sheet.

4. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 2, wherein an insulating coating is formed on a surface of the steel sheet.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0022] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between a parameter PT and a deviation of magnetic characteristics in a width direction in a soaking area of a final annealing furnace.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0023] A non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention (hereinafter, also referred to as an electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment) will be described. The electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes a steel sheet. The electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment may consist of a steel sheet, but may include an insulating coating on a surface (one surface or both surfaces) of the steel sheet.

[0024] In addition, in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, the steel sheet contains, as a chemical composition, in % by mass, C: 0.0030% or less, Si: 1.0 to 3.5%, Al: 0.10 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.1 to 2.0%, P: 0.20% or less, S: 0.0030% or less, N: 0.0030% or less, Ti: 0.0030% or less, B: 0.0020% or less, Sn: 0 to 0.200%, Sb: 0 to 0.1000%, and a remainder: Fe and impurities, when a Sn content is represented by [Sn] and an Sb content is represented by [Sb] in % by mass, [Sn]+2[Sb]0.200 is satisfied, and when a sheet width of the steel sheet is represented by W, WH/WL, which is a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of iron loss W10/400 at a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part which are a part at a W/10 position, a part at a W/4 position, and a part at a W/2 position of the sheet width from an end portion in a width direction respectively, is 1.10 or less.

[0025] Hereinafter, the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment and a method for manufacturing the electrical steel sheet will be described.

<Steel Sheet>

[0026] A steel sheet (also referred to as a base steel sheet) included in the non-oriented electrical steel sheet will be described.

[Chemical Composition]

[0027] A reason for limiting a chemical composition of a steel sheet included in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment (which can be also said to be a chemical composition of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet when the non-oriented electrical steel sheet includes only the steel sheet) will be described. % relating to the content of each element constituting the chemical composition means % by mass unless otherwise specified.

[0028] C: 0.0030% or less

[0029] C is an element that causes magnetic aging and increases iron loss. In addition, C is an element having a large influence on a deviation of magnetic characteristics. Therefore, a C content is 0.0030% or less. The C content is preferably 0.0025% or less, and more preferably 0.0020% or less.

[0030] The C content is preferably as small as possible, and may be 0%. However, the C content may be 0.0005% or more because an excessive reduction in the C content leads to an increase in cost.

[0031] Si: 1.0 to 3.5%

[0032] Si is an element that increases electric resistance of the steel sheet, reduces eddy-current loss, and reduces iron loss. In addition, Si is an element having a large influence on a deviation of magnetic characteristics. When an Si content is less than 1.0%, electric resistance of the steel sheet does not increase and iron loss does not decrease. Therefore, the Si content is 1.0% or more. The Si content is preferably 1.8% or more, and more preferably 2.0% or more.

[0033] On the other hand, when the Si content exceeds 3.5%, magnetic flux density and punching workability are significantly reduced, and manufacturing cost increases. Therefore, the Si content is 3.5% or less. The Si content is preferably 3.3% or less, and more preferably 3.2% or less.

[0034] Al: 0.10 to 2.00%

[0035] Al is an element that is unavoidably mixed from an ore or a refractory, but contributes to deoxidation, and increases electric resistance to reduce eddy-current loss and to reduce iron loss similarly to Si.

[0036] When an Al content is less than 0.10%, fine AlN is formed to adversely affect iron loss, and thus the Al content is 0.10% or more. The Al content is preferably 0.20% or more, and more preferably 0.50% or more.

[0037] On the other hand, when the Al content exceeds 2.00%, saturation magnetic flux density decreases and magnetic flux density decreases, and thus the Al content is 2.00% or less. The Al content is preferably 1.50% or less, and more preferably 1.20% or less.

[0038] Mn: 0.1 to 2.0%

[0039] Mn is an element that increases electric resistance, reduces eddy-current loss, and suppresses precipitation of a fine sulfide such as MnS, which is harmful to growth of grains.

[0040] When the Mn content is less than 0.1%, the effect cannot be sufficiently obtained. Therefore, the Mn content is 0.1% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.2% or more, and more preferably 0.4% or more.

[0041] On the other hand, when the Mn content exceeds 2.0%, growth of grains during annealing decreases, and iron loss increases. Therefore, the Mn content is 2.0% or less. The Mn content is preferably 1.5% or less, and more preferably 1.2% or less.

[0042] P: 0.20% or less

[0043] When the P content exceeds 0.20%, toughness of the steel sheet is reduced and the steel sheet is likely to be fractured. Therefore, the P content is 0.20% or less. The P content is preferably 0.15% or less, and more preferably 0.12% or less. The lower limit of the P content is not particularly limited (may be 0%), but 0.001% is a substantial lower limit in consideration of manufacturing cost.

[0044] S: 0.0030% or less

[0045] S is an element that forms a fine sulfide such as MnS and inhibits recrystallization and grain growth during final annealing or the like. When a S content exceeds 0.0030%, recrystallization and grain growth during final annealing or the like are significantly inhibited, and magnetic characteristics are deteriorated. Therefore, the S content is 0.0030% or less. The S content is preferably 0.0020% or less, and more preferably 0.0015% or less. The lower limit of the S content is not particularly limited (may be 0%), but 0.0001% is a lower limit in consideration of an industrial purification technique, and 0.0003% is a substantial lower limit in consideration of manufacturing cost.

[0046] N: 0.0030% or less

[0047] N is an element that forms a precipitate and increases iron loss. When the N content exceeds 0.0030%, iron loss significantly increases. Therefore, the N content is 0.0030% or less. The N content is preferably 0.0020% or less, and more preferably 0.0015% or less. The lower limit of the N content is not particularly limited (may be 0%), but 0.0005% is a substantial lower limit in consideration of manufacturing cost.

[0048] Ti: 0.0030% or less

[0049] Ti is an element that forms a precipitate and increases iron loss. When the Ti content exceeds 0.0030%, iron loss significantly increases, and thus the Ti content is 0.0030% or less. The Ti content is preferably 0.0020% or less, and more preferably 0.0015% or less. The lower limit of the Ti content is not particularly limited (may be 0%), but 0.0005% is a substantial lower limit in consideration of manufacturing cost.

[0050] B: 0.0020% or less

[0051] B is an element that forms a precipitate and increases iron loss. When the B content exceeds 0.0020%, iron loss significantly increases. Therefore, the B content is 0.0020% or less. The B content is preferably 0.0010% or less, and more preferably 0.0005% or less. The lower limit of the B content is not particularly limited (may be 0%), but 0.0001% is a substantial lower limit in consideration of an industrial purification technique.

[0052] Sn: 0 to 0.200%

[0053] Sb: 0 to 0.1000%

[0054] Sn and Sb are elements that suppress surface nitriding and also contribute to reduction of iron loss. Therefore, in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, one or two of Sn and Sb may be contained in the chemical composition of the steel sheet.

[0055] Sn and Sb are elements having similar effects, but there is a difference in the degree of influence therebetween. Therefore, when the Sn content is represented by [Sn] and the Sb content is represented by [Sb] in % by mass, a range of [Sn]+2[Sb] is controlled.

[0056] Specifically, in a case of obtaining an effect of improving magnetic characteristics, [Sn]+2[Sb] is preferably 0.020 or more. [Sn]+2[Sb] is more preferably 0.050 or more.

[0057] On the other hand, when [Sn]+2[Sb] exceeds 0.200, toughness of the steel sheet is deteriorated. Therefore, [Sn]+2[Sb] is 0.200 or less. [Sn]+2[Sb] is preferably 0.100 or less.

[0058] The Sn content is 0 to 0.200% and the Sb content is 0 to 0.1000% as a range satisfying [Sn]+2[Sb]0.200.

Remainder: Fe and impurities

[0059] In the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, a remainder excluding the above elements may be Fe and impurities. The impurity is an element that is mixed from a steel raw material and/or in a steelmaking process and is allowed as long as characteristics of the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment are not impaired.

[0060] On the other hand, other elements may be further contained instead of a part of Fe. For example, Cu or Ni may be contained as long as the amount of each of Cu and Ni does not exceed 0.1%. Another element may also be contained in a range not exceeding 0.05%.

[0061] It is only required to measure the chemical composition of the steel sheet by a general analysis method of steel. For example, it is only required to measure the chemical composition using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). Specifically, the chemical composition is specified by measuring a test piece collected from the steel sheet with a predetermined measuring device under a condition based on a calibration curve prepared in advance. C and S may be measured using a combustion-infrared absorption method, and N may be measured using an inert gas fusion-thermal conductivity method.

[0062] When the steel sheet has an insulating coating on a surface thereof, the steel sheet may be subjected to analysis after the insulating coating is mechanically removed by a minitor or the like.

<WH/WL (Deviation of Magnetic Characteristics) which is a Ratio Between a Maximum Value WH and a Minimum Value WL of Iron Loss W10/400:1.10 or Less>

[0063] The electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment has a small deviation of magnetic characteristics of the steel sheet in the width direction. Specifically, when a sheet width of the steel sheet included in the non-oriented electrical steel sheet is represented by W, W10/400 (a measured value of iron loss at 400 Hz at a magnetic flux density of 1.0 T) is measured by a single sheet tester method (SST method) defined in JISC2556:2015 at a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part which are a part at a W/10 position, a part at a W/4 position, and a part at a W/2 position of the sheet width from an end portion in a width direction, respectively, and WH/WL (deviation of magnetic characteristics), which is a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of W10/400, is obtained, WH/WL is 1.10 or less.

[0064] In a case where WH/WL exceeds 1.10, cogging torque, that is, rotation unevenness increases and sound during rotation increases when the non-oriented electrical steel sheets are stacked to form a motor, which is not preferable. Therefore, by controlling the deviation WH/WL of magnetic characteristics to 1.10 or less, cogging torque, that is, rotation unevenness can be reduced, and sound during rotation can be reduced (for example, 40 db or less).

[0065] It is considered that suppression of the deviation of the magnetic characteristics in the width direction is achieved by, for example, controlling the distribution of inclusions or a state of strain in a minute region. However, it is not easy to accurately evaluate these, and therefore in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment is characterized by the WH/WL.

[0066] In addition, in the present embodiment, the ratio between the maximum value WH and the minimum value WL of W10/400 is defined instead of another value of iron loss such as W15/50. Although W10/400 is a characteristic required for a device assumed to be used, W10/400 is easily affected by residual strain. Therefore, it is more difficult to control W10/400 than another iron loss value such as W15/50, and variation of W10/400 tends to be large. Therefore, for example, even when the ratio between the maximum value and the minimum value of W15/50 is 1.10 or less, WH/WL is not necessarily 1.10 or less.

[0067] Measurement of W10/400 by a single sheet tester method (SST method) defined in JISC2556:2015 at a W/10 part means that a sample having a size of 55 mm square is collected such that the sample includes the W/10 part, and W10/400 is measured by the SST method using the sample. The same applies to measurements at a W/4 part and a W/2 part.

[0068] In addition, in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, the deviation of the magnetic characteristics in the width direction is preferably small even in a case of a lower magnetic field.

[0069] For example, when W5/400 is measured by the SST method defined in JISC2556:2015 at a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part and WH2/WL2 (deviation of magnetic characteristics), which is a ratio between a maximum value WH2 and a minimum value WL2 of W5/400, is obtained, WH2/WL2 is preferably 1.10 or less.

[0070] WH2/WL2 can be measured in a similar manner to WH/WL.

[0071] As the width (sheet width) of the steel sheet is larger, the deviation of the magnetic characteristics in the width direction tends to be larger. However, in the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, at least when the width is 1000 mm or less, the deviation of the magnetic characteristics can be reduced as described above. By performing more strict control, the deviation of the magnetic characteristics can be reduced when the width is 1300 mm or less.

<Insulating Coating>

[0072] In the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, an insulating coating may be formed on a surface of the steel sheet.

[0073] This insulating coating may be a known coating. For example, a coating made of Al.sub.2O.sub.3 is an exemplary example.

<Method for Manufacturing Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet>

[0074] A method for manufacturing the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment is not particularly limited, but a method including the following steps and performing each of the steps under preferable conditions is preferable. [0075] (I) a hot rolling step of heating and hot rolling a slab to obtain a hot rolled sheet; [0076] (II) a hot-rolled sheet annealing step of annealing the hot rolled sheet (coil); [0077] (III) a cold rolling step of pickling and cold-rolling the hot rolled sheet after the hot-rolled sheet annealing step to obtain a cold rolled sheet; and [0078] (IV) a final annealing step of performing final annealing on the cold rolled sheet.

[0079] The method may further include the following step. [0080] (V) an insulating coating forming step of forming an insulating coating on the steel sheet (non-oriented electrical steel sheet) after the final annealing step.

[0081] Preferred conditions for each of the steps will be described below. To conditions that are not described, known conditions can be applied.

[Hot Rolling Step]

[0082] In the hot rolling step, a slab is heated, hot-rolled to obtain a hot rolled sheet, and coiled into a coil shape.

[0083] A chemical composition of the slab may be determined to be used according to a chemical composition of a steel sheet included in a non-oriented electrical steel sheet to be finally obtained.

[0084] The heating temperature of the slab is preferably 1050 to 1250 C. When the heating temperature is lower than 1050 C., the coiling temperature at which the hot rolled sheet is coiled into a coil shape cannot be ensured to a certain temperature or higher, and as a result, magnetic characteristics of a product may be deteriorated. On the other hand, when the heating temperature exceeds 1250 C., precipitates excessively form a solid solution and are finely precipitated during hot rolling, whereby iron loss of a product may be deteriorated. The slab heating temperature is more preferably 1100 to 1200 C.

[0085] The temperature during passing through a final stand of finish rolling in the hot rolling (finish rolling temperature) is preferably in a range of 800 to 1000 C. This is because it is difficult to set the coiling temperature into a coil to a range described later outside this range. The finish rolling temperature is more preferably 820 to 950 C., and still more preferably 900 to 1000 C.

[0086] The sheet thickness of the hot rolled sheet is preferably 1.6 to 2.8 mm because when the sheet thickness is too large, magnetic characteristics of a product sheet are deteriorated, and when the sheet thickness is too small, a required temperature cannot be ensured. The sheet thickness is more preferably 1.8 to 2.5 mm.

[0087] The coiling temperature into a coil in hot rolling is preferably in a range of 650 to 900 C. When the coiling temperature is lower than 650 C., there is a concern that the finish rolling temperature decreases and the rolling load increases. When the coiling temperature exceeds 900 C., a surface of the coil may be oxidized to deteriorate an appearance. The coiling temperature is more preferably 680 to 850 C., and still more preferably 700 to 800 C.

[Hot-Rolled Sheet Annealing Step]

[0088] In the hot-rolled sheet annealing step, the hot rolled sheet that has been hot-rolled is annealed (hot rolled sheet-annealed). A soaking temperature is preferably 850 to 1000 C. When the soaking temperature is lower than 850 C., magnetic characteristics may be deteriorated. On the other hand, when the soaking temperature exceeds 1000 C., toughness may decrease. The soaking temperature is more preferably in a range of 900 C. to 950 C. A soaking time is preferably 10 to 180 seconds. The soaking time is more preferably 15 to 120 seconds in consideration of magnetic characteristics and productivity. The annealing may be performed in a coil shape, or may be performed after uncoiling as necessary.

[Cold Rolling Step]

[0089] The hot rolled sheet after the hot-rolled sheet annealing step is uncoiled from the coil shape, subjected to a pickling step under known conditions, and then cold-rolled.

[0090] The cold rolling may be one time (a series of) cold rolling in which intermediate annealing is not performed, or may be two or more times of cold rolling sandwiching intermediate annealing therebetween.

[0091] The sheet thickness of the cold rolled sheet after the cold rolling step (equivalent to that of a base steel sheet as a final product) is preferably 0.20 to 0.50 mm from a viewpoint of magnetic characteristics. Furthermore, in consideration of productivity, the sheet thickness of the cold rolled sheet is more preferably in a range of 0.25 to 0.50 mm.

[0092] A total rolling ratio in a final cold rolling step is preferably 75 to 90% from a viewpoint of magnetic characteristics, and more preferably 80 to 88% in consideration of both magnetic characteristics and productivity.

[Final Annealing Step]

[0093] In the final annealing step, the steel sheet (cold rolled sheet) after the cold rolling is subjected to final annealing.

[0094] Heating conditions in the final annealing step are not particularly limited. The soaking temperature during the final annealing is preferably 950 to 1100 C., and more preferably in a range of 1000 to 1100 C. from the viewpoint of magnetic characteristics. As for the annealing time, the soaking time is preferably 10 to 180 seconds. In consideration of magnetic characteristics and productivity, the soaking time is more preferably 15 to 60 seconds.

[0095] In the final annealing step, annealing is performed by a continuous annealing furnace, and final annealing is performed such that PT=WtLT/Vc>100 is satisfied, in which W (mm) represents the sheet width of a cold rolled sheet to be subjected to final annealing, t (mm) represents the sheet thickness of the cold rolled sheet, L (in) represents the length between hearth rolls in a soaking area in the continuous annealing furnace (the distance between centers of adjacent hearth rolls), T (MPa) represents a tension applied to the steel sheet during annealing, and Vc ( C./sec) represents the average cooling rate from completion of soaking to 650 C.

[0096] When PT exceeds 100, the deviation of the magnetic characteristics in the width direction can be reduced (1.10 or less). An upper limit of PT is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, 1000 or less. PT may be 200 or more, or 400 or more.

[0097] A reason why PT exceeds 100 will be described on the basis of Experimental Examples conducted by the present inventors.

Experimental Example 1

[0098] A slab containing, as a chemical composition, in % by mass, C: 0.001%, Si: 3.0%, Al: 0.50%, Mn: 0.2%, P: 0.010%, S: 0.0100%, N: 0.0010%, Ti: 0.0010%, and B: 0.0010% was heated to 1160 C., and then hot-rolled at a finish rolling temperature of 850 C. to obtain a hot rolled sheet having a sheet thickness of 2.0 mm. This hot rolled sheet was coiled into a coil shape at 650 C. (coiling temperature).

[0099] This coil was uncoiled, heated to 1000 C., held at the temperature for 60 seconds, and then coiled and air-cooled.

[0100] This coil was uncoiled, pickled, and then cold-rolled to obtain a cold rolled sheet having a sheet width of 1000 mm and a sheet thickness of 0.50 mm.

[0101] This cold rolled sheet was subjected to final annealing in which the cold rolled sheet was heated to 1000 C. (soaking temperature) and held (soaked) for 30 seconds.

[0102] In the final annealing, a length L between hearth rolls in a soaking area was changed in a range from 2.0 to 5.0 m, a tension T applied to the steel sheet was changed from 2 to 6 N/mm.sup.2, and an average cooling rate Vc from completion of soaking to 650 C. was changed in a range from 4 to 10 C./sec.

[0103] A sample having a size of 55 mm square was sheared and collected from each of a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part of the steel sheet after final annealing, W10/400 (a measured value of iron loss at 400 Hz at a magnetic flux density of 1.0 T) was measured by a single sheet tester method (SST method) defined in JISC2556:2015, and a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of W10/400 was defined as a deviation of magnetic characteristics.

[0104] As a result, as illustrated in FIG, by setting PT to more than 100, WH/WL could be controlled to 1.10 or less.

[0105] Therefore, in the method for manufacturing the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, final annealing step is performed such that PT exceeds 100.

[0106] A reason why it is preferable to increase the distance between the hearth rolls is expected that when the distance between the hearth rolls is increased, a catenary of the steel sheet in the width direction increases, and large strain is uniformly applied in the width direction. Residual strain caused by cooling is smaller than strain caused by catenary. Therefore, even when the residual strain caused by cooling is non-uniformly caused in the width direction, it is considered that an influence thereof is small.

[0107] A reason why it is preferable to increase the tension is considered that large strain is uniformly applied in the width direction by increasing the tension. Usually, when the tension is increased, catenary slightly decreases, but an influence of iron loss deterioration caused by extension of the steel sheet itself is large. The residual strain caused by cooling is smaller than the strain caused by increasing the tension. Therefore, even when the residual strain caused by cooling is non-uniformly caused in the width direction, it is considered that an influence thereof is small.

[0108] On the other hand, it is presumed that a reason why the average cooling rate up to 650 C. is preferably low after soaking of final annealing is that the influence of the residual strain by cooling cannot be ignored when the average rate increases, whereby the deviation of magnetic characteristics in the width direction increases.

[0109] Even when a recrystallization ratio is controlled before the final annealing step by, for example, hot-rolled sheet annealing to reduce deviation of the recrystallization ratio depending due to the position of the steel sheet, the magnetic characteristics vary unless the subsequent steps are sufficiently controlled. Therefore, cold rolling conditions and final annealing are important.

[0110] In a case where a predetermined deviation of magnetic characteristics is achieved even when the sheet width is wider, the soaking temperature of the final annealing step is preferably increased, and is preferably, for example, 1000 C. or higher.

[0111] When the deviation of low-magnetic field iron loss is reduced, PT is preferably 600 or more, and more preferably 700 or more.

[Insulating Coating Forming Step]

[0112] To obtain the electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment is a non-oriented electrical steel sheet including an insulating coating on a surface of a steel sheet (base steel sheet), in addition to the above steps, an insulating coating forming step of forming an insulating coating on a surface of the steel sheet after the final annealing step may be performed as in a conventional process of manufacturing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet. As conditions of the insulating coating forming step, similar conditions to those of an insulating coating forming step of a conventional non-oriented electrical steel sheet may be adopted.

EXAMPLES

[0113] A slab having an adjusted chemical composition was cast, then heated and hot-rolled under any of the conditions in Table 2 to form a hot rolled sheet, and then coiled.

[0114] The hot rolled sheet was subjected to hot-rolled sheet annealing under any of the conditions in Table 2, and cooled to room temperature.

[0115] Thereafter, the hot rolled sheet was pickled and cold-rolled to obtain a steel sheet (cold rolled sheet) having a sheet thickness of 0.25 to 0.50 mun.

[0116] This steel sheet (cold rolled sheet) was subjected to final annealing under any of the conditions illustrated in Table 2 to obtain a non-oriented electrical steel sheet. Insulating coatings were formed on surfaces of some of the non-oriented electrical steel sheets.

[0117] When a chemical composition of a steel sheet included in the obtained non-oriented electrical steel sheet was measured, the steel sheet contained the chemical components illustrated in Table 1, with the remainder being Fe and impurities.

[0118] For non-oriented electrical steel sheets (C1 to C20 and c1 to c20) having any of the chemical compositions illustrated in Table 1 and manufactured by any of the manufacturing methods illustrated in Table 2, W10/400 (a measured value of iron loss at 400 Hz at a magnetic flux density of 1.0 T) at each of a W/10 part, a W/4 part, and a W/2 part was measured by a single sheet tester method (SST method) defined in JISC2556:2015. At this time, a sample was collected for each of the W/10 part, the W/4 part, and the W/2 part at a certain position in a rolling direction, and the value thereof was defined as iron loss value at each position. In addition, WH/WL (the deviation of magnetic characteristics), which is a ratio between a maximum value WH and a minimum value WL of iron loss values at the positions, was calculated.

[0119] In some examples, a ratio WH2/WL2 between a maximum value WH2 and a minimum value WL2 of W5/400 was obtained as a deviation of magnetic characteristics of iron loss in a lower magnetic field.

[0120] The above measurement was performed three times at positions spaced apart by one hoop in the rolling direction, and values of WH/WL and WH2/WL2 at positions where WH/WL and WH2/WL2 are the largest are illustrated in Table. Table 3 indicates the results.

[0121] When the iron loss at each position was 25.0 W/kg or less and WH/WL was 1.10 or less, it was determined that magnetic characteristics were good and a deviation of the magnetic characteristics in the width direction was small.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Steel Chemical composition (mass %) No. C Si Mn Al P S N Ti B Sb Sn Sn + 2Sb A1 0.0030 1.3 0.2 0.40 0.01 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 A2 0.0020 1.0 0.3 0.50 0.01 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 A3 0.0010 3.5 0.3 0.20 0.02 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 A4 0.0010 2.9 0.1 0.80 0.03 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 A5 0.0010 1.8 2.0 0.80 0.03 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 A6 0.0020 3.1 0.2 0.10 0.02 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 A7 0.0020 3.2 0.4 2.00 0.05 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 A8 0.0010 2.8 1.2 0.20 0.20 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 A9 0.0010 2.9 1.8 0.90 0.01 0.0030 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 A10 0.0020 1.8 1.2 1.20 0.05 0.0020 0.0030 0.0010 0.0010 A11 0.0020 1.9 1.1 0.60 0.01 0.0020 0.0010 0.0030 0.0010 A12 0.0010 1.5 0.4 0.90 0.01 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0020 A13 0.0010 2.3 0.5 1.20 0.02 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0015 0.003 A14 0.0020 2.8 1.4 1.80 0.05 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.004 0.004 A15 0.0020 2.5 1.3 0.40 0.01 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0005 0.001 0.002 A16 0.0020 3.1 1.2 0.30 0.04 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0800 0.040 0.200 A17 0.0020 2.9 0.9 0.70 0.05 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0550 0.070 0.180 A18 0.0020 1.9 0.6 1.10 0.06 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0250 0.100 0.150 a1 0.0090 1.2 0.2 1.20 0.03 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0005 0.004 0.005 a2 0.0020 0.1 1.2 1.10 0.03 0.0010 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0005 0.002 0.003 a3 0.0020 4.5 1.4 0.50 0.04 0.0030 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.006 0.008 a4 0.0010 3.1 0.01 0.60 0.02 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0450 0.012 0.102 a5 0.0020 2.4 3.2 1.20 0.08 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0100 0.081 0.101 a6 0.0010 3.2 0.5 0.02 0.04 0.0030 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0005 0.008 0.009 a7 0.0020 3.1 0.9 3.20 0.05 0.0029 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.005 0.007 a8 0.0010 2.3 1.1 1.50 0.30 0.0028 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0105 0.091 0.112 a9 0.0020 2.4 1.5 1.20 0.11 0.0090 0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0010 0.009 0.011 a10 0.0020 2.5 1.8 1.80 0.12 0.0020 0.0200 0.0010 0.0010 0.0110 0.079 0.101 a11 0.0010 2.1 1.2 1.10 0.12 0.0030 0.0010 0.0200 0.0010 0.0165 0.068 0.101 a12 0.0020 1.8 1.9 1.90 0.08 0.0030 0.0010 0.0020 0.0200 0.0020 0.004 0.008

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Hot rolling Finish rolling Hot-rolled sheet Cold rolling Slab final annealing Cold heating rolling Coiling Holding Holding rolling Sheet Manufacturing temperature temperature temperature temperature time reduction thickness method No. ( C.) ( C.) ( C.) ( C.) (sec) (%) (mm) B1 1100 900 680 890 120 82 0.50 B2 1150 920 720 900 120 83 0.35 B3 1160 920 780 920 170 85 0.35 B4 1100 850 700 920 100 75 0.25 B5 1150 829 800 930 110 75 0.35 B6 1150 830 700 900 100 88 0.35 B7 1160 850 680 950 120 88 0.35 b1 1300 780 620 820 5 95 0.15 b2 1320 790 600 810 200 92 0.15 b3 1010 1050 950 1050 240 70 0.65 b4 1020 1040 950 1100 300 70 0.65 b5 1300 780 620 820 5 95 0.15 b6 1320 790 600 810 200 92 0.15 b7 1100 850 700 920 100 75 0.25 b8 1150 829 800 930 110 75 0.35 Final annealing Interval Steel Average between sheet Soaking Soaking cooling Sheet Sheet hearth tensile Manufacturing temperature time rate Vc width W thickness t rolls force T Parameter method No. ( C.) (sec) ( C./sec) (mm) (mm) L(m) (MPa) PT B1 990 60 9 920 0.50 2.0 5 511 B2 980 70 4 950 0.35 2.3 4 765 B3 1000 80 5 1030 0.35 2.5 5 901 B4 1020 60 6 1000 0.25 3.0 5 625 B5 1000 100 6 1100 0.35 2.5 4 642 B6 1000 65 6 1200 0.35 2.5 4 700 B7 1050 65 6 1300 0.35 2.4 4 728 b1 800 8 15 1010 0.15 2.2 3 67 b2 850 190 18 1030 0.15 1.4 2 24 b3 1200 195 20 920 0.65 1.6 2 96 b4 1250 200 30 950 0.65 1.1 2 45 b5 800 8 15 1200 0.20 2.2 3 106 b6 850 190 18 900 0.15 3.0 5 113 b7 1020 60 6 920 0.25 1.1 2 84 b8 1000 100 6 1000 0.20 1.5 1.5 75

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Iron loss W10/400 Ratio WH/WL between maximum value Iron loss W15/50 Manufacturing W/10 W/4 W/2 and W/10 Steel method part part part minimum part No. No. No. (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) value (W/kg) Invention C1 A1 B1 20.1 20.0 19.1 1.05 Example C2 A2 B2 21.0 21.0 20.2 1.04 C3 A3 B3 22.0 21.0 21.0 1.05 C4 A4 B4 21.0 20.0 19.3 1.09 2.00 C5 A5 B5 24.0 23.1 23.1 1.04 C6 A6 B1 21.0 20.0 20.0 1.05 C7 A7 B2 23.0 22.3 22.4 1.03 C8 A8 B3 22.0 21.3 21.2 1.04 C9 A9 B4 19.0 18.1 18.1 1.05 2.11 C10 A10 B5 19.0 18.6 19.0 1.02 C11 A11 B1 20.0 20.0 19.6 1.02 C12 A12 B2 21.0 20.4 20.9 1.03 C13 A13 B3 18.0 17.9 17.3 1.04 C14 A14 B4 18.0 16.5 17.1 1.09 1.98 C15 A15 B5 19.0 20.1 20.5 1.08 C16 A16 B1 21.0 19.1 19.6 1.07 C17 A17 B2 22.0 22.9 22.2 1.04 C18 A18 B3 24.0 23.1 22.2 1.08 C19 A18 B6 19.8 19.9 19.7 1.01 2.10 C20 A18 B7 19.7 19.9 19.7 1.01 Comparative c1 a1 b1 23.0 19.3 19.0 1.21 1.82 Example c2 a2 b2 24.0 18.2 19.1 1.32 1.82 c3 a3 b3 20.0 19.1 13.9 1.44 3.22 c4 a4 b4 18.0 17.1 11.8 1.52 3.24 c5 a5 b1 19.0 14.4 15.2 1.32 1.83 c6 a6 b2 21.0 14.8 13.5 1.56 1.82 c7 a7 b3 24.0 14.9 15.1 1.61 3.23 c8 a8 b4 25.0 23.1 11.9 2.10 3.24 c9 a9 b1 12.0 25.6 19.0 2.13 1.81 c10 a10 b2 25.0 11.4 13.2 2.20 1.93 c11 a11 b3 20.0 10.1 12.3 1.98 3.42 c12 a12 b4 19.0 10.6 12.3 1.80 3.31 c13 A1 b1 20.0 11.0 12.3 1.82 2.01 c14 A2 b2 21.0 12.3 12.3 1.71 1.91 c15 A3 b5 21.0 19.1 18.9 1.11 1.91 c16 A4 b6 22.0 19.6 21.3 1.12 1.98 c17 A5 b7 22.0 19.5 21.2 1.13 1.98 c18 A6 b8 23.0 20.2 19.0 1.21 2.23 c19 a1 B1 22.0 11.7 12.3 1.88 3.11 c20 a2 B2 23.0 12.0 12.3 1.91 2.09 Iron loss W5/400 Iron loss W15/50 Ratio Ratio WH2/WL2 between between maximum maximum value value W/4 W/2 and W/10 W/4 W/2 and part part minimum part part part minimum No. (W/kg) (W/kg) value (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) value Invention C1 3.74 3.98 3.25 1.22 Example C2 C3 C4 2.15 2.11 1.08 3.82 3.52 3.50 1.09 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 2.19 2.19 1.04 3.35 3.19 3.17 1.06 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 2.14 2.01 1.08 3.09 2.81 2.88 1.10 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 2.10 2.12 1.01 3.82 3.58 3.49 1.09 C20 3.82 3.61 3.50 1.09 Comparative c1 1.81 1.77 1.03 Example c2 1.71 1.80 1.06 c3 3.22 3.04 1.06 c4 3.22 3.11 1.04 c5 1.77 1.83 1.03 c6 1.79 1.77 1.03 c7 3.11 3.10 1.04 c8 3.11 3.01 1.08 c9 1.98 1.83 1.09 c10 1.81 1.81 1.07 c11 3.22 3.22 1.06 c12 3.12 3.22 1.06 c13 1.87 1.88 1.07 c14 1.81 1.81 1.06 c15 1.85 1.85 1.03 c16 1.86 1.86 1.06 c17 1.88 1.91 1.05 c18 2.11 2.11 1.06 c19 3.03 3.03 1.03 c20 1.99 1.99 1.05

[0122] As illustrated in Tables 1 to 3, in a steel sheet having a predetermined chemical composition and subjected to final annealing under a condition that the parameter PT of the final annealing conditions exceeded 100, the magnetic characteristics were good and the deviation in the width direction was small. In addition, when PT was higher, the deviation of iron loss in the width direction was small even in a low magnetic field. In addition, in a case where a soaking temperature of the final annealing was high, the deviation of iron loss in the width direction was small even when the steel sheet was wide.

[0123] On the other hand, in Comparative Examples in which a chemical composition was out of the range of the present invention and/or a manufacturing method was out of a preferred range, the deviation of magnetic characteristics (iron loss) in the width direction was large.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0124] According to the present invention, it is possible to manufacture a non-oriented electrical steel sheet having good magnetic characteristics and a small deviation of magnetic characteristics in a width direction.

[0125] Such a non-oriented electrical steel sheet can suppress cogging torque, that is, rotation unevenness when stacked into a motor, and therefore is highly industrially applicable.