Magnetic Mine Sweeping
20260125141 ยท 2026-05-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A magnetic mine countermeasure payload device with a non-magnetic plate, and magnetic elements, each having a north magnetic pole and a south magnetic pole, affixed to the plate in a magnetic array. A rotational shaft is coupled to the plate, with a motor coupled to the shaft, and an electrical power source electrically connected to the motor. The motor is configured to at least one of selectively rotate the magnetic array, thereby creating an AC magnetic moment in the magnetic mine countermeasure payload device, and not rotate the magnetic array, thereby enabling a DC magnetic moment in the magnetic mine countermeasure payload device.
Claims
1. A magnetic mine countermeasure payload device comprising: a non-magnetic plate, magnetic elements, each having a north magnetic pole and a south magnetic pole, the magnetic elements affixed to the plate in a magnetic array, a rotational shaft coupled to the plate, a motor coupled to the shaft, and an electrical power source electrically connected to the motor, wherein the motor is configured to at least one of selectively rotate the magnetic array, thereby creating an AC magnetic moment in the magnetic mine countermeasure payload device, and not rotate the magnetic array, thereby enabling a DC magnetic moment in the magnetic mine countermeasure payload device.
2. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the magnetic elements include at least one of a permanent magnet, and a superconducting trapped flux magnet.
3. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the magnetic elements have a shape that includes at least one of round, square, rectangular, hexagonal, and multi-polygonal.
4. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 2, wherein the permanent magnet is formed of at least one of NdFeB, SmCo, and AlNiCo.
5. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 2, wherein the superconducting trapped flux magnet is formed of at least one of BiSrCaCuO, ReBaCuO, TlBaCaCuO, HgCaBaCuO, MgB, NbTi, NbSn, NN, and NbGe.
6. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, further comprising a gearbox mechanically coupled between the motor and the shaft.
7. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the device generates at least one of a steady state magnetic moment, and a time varying magnetic moment.
8. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein multiple plates are rotated at at least one of a constant angular velocity, and variable angular velocity.
9. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the plates are aligned in at least one of a parallel configuration, and an anti-parallel configuration.
10. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, further comprising a hermetic water-tight container configured to house the magnetic mine countermeasure payload.
11. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the payload is mounted to at least one of an unmanned surface vessel, an unmanned underwater vessel, a manned surface vessel, and a towable array.
12. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the rotational shaft is rotated at at least one of a fixed AC frequency, and a variable AC frequency.
13. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the power source is at least one of a battery, an AC power source, and a DC power source.
14. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the plates are at least one of round, square, rectangular, hexagonal, and multi-polygonal.
15. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 1, wherein the device is fixed in a vessel and the vessel is rotated in at least one of a fixed angular rotation, and a variable angular rotation, thereby creating an AC magnetic signature of the array.
16. A magnetic mine countermeasure payload device comprising: a non-magnetic plate, magnetic elements, each having a north magnetic pole and a south magnetic pole, the magnetic elements affixed to the plate in a magnetic array, wherein when the array is rotated, an AC magnetic moment in the magnetic mine countermeasure payload device is generated, and when the array is not rotated, a DC magnetic moment in the device is generated.
17. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 16, wherein the magnetic elements include at least one of a permanent magnet, and a superconducting trapped flux magnet.
18. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 16, wherein the array is rotated at at least one of a constant angular velocity, and variable angular velocity.
19. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 16, wherein multiple plates are aligned in at least one of a parallel configuration, and an anti-parallel configuration.
20. The magnetic mine countermeasure payload device of claim 16, further comprising a hermetic water-tight container configured to house the magnetic mine countermeasure payload.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023] Further advantages of the invention are apparent by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the figures, which are not to scale so as to more clearly show the details, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
DESCRIPTION
[0034] With reference now to the drawings, there are depicted all of the claimed elements of the various embodiments, although all claimed embodiments might not be depicted in a single drawing. Thus, it is appreciated that not all embodiments include all of the elements as depicted, and that some embodiments include different combinations of the depicted elements. It is further appreciated that the various elements can all have many different configurations, and are not limited to just the configuration of a given element as depicted. As indicated above, the elements of the drawings as depicted are not to scale, even with respect one to another, and relative size or thickness of one element cannot be determined by the aspect ratios of that element or with reference to any dimension of another element.
Definitions
[0035] The terms, acronyms, and explanations listed below are provided for convenience and are not to be taken as binding for claim construction.
TABLE-US-00001 Symbol Definition Units (if applicable) AC Alternating Current (A.sub.rms) Al Aluminum B Boron B or B-field Magnetic field Tesla B.sub.r Remnant Magnetic Flux Density Tesla dB/dt Time varying B-field Tesla/s Co Cobalt Cu Copper DC Direct Current A Fe Iron G or G-field Gradient field Tesla/meters H or H-field Magnetic field Strength Amp-turns/meter HTS High Temperature Superconducting I Current Amps J Current density A/m.sup.2 M Magnetization A/m MIM Magnetic Influence Mine M-MCM Magnetic Mine Countermeasures MSV Manned Surface Vessel Nd Neodymium Ni Nickel N/S North/South Poles PM Permanent magnet NdFeB, SmCo, AlNiCo, etc. .sub.r Relative magnetic permeability dimensionless quantity .sub.0 Magnetic permeability of free (N/A.sup.2 space Resistivity Ohm-m Sm Samarium T.sub.c Superconducting transition K temperature T.sub.curie Curie temperature K USV Unmanned Surface Vessel UUV Unmanned Underwater Vessel V Volume m.sup.3 Angular frequency RPM or Hz
Depicted Embodiments
[0036]
[0037] In this embodiment, the multiple PMs (20) in the magnetic array (30) have their N/S poles (50) facing in the radial or (r) direction (60). When the magnetic array (30) or plate (40) is stationary or fixed, the PMs (20) of the array (30) create a steady state magnetic signature or DC magnetization (not shown). When the plate (40) is rotated about its central axis via a shaft (80) at an angular velocity (90), the rotating array (30) creates a time varying B-field (dB/dt) or AC magnetization (not shown).
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042] The motor (130) in one embodiment is coupled to a gearbox (not shown), which increases the torque on the shaft (80). The motor (130) and gear box rotate the multiple plates (40) about their central axis at an angular velocity (90), and the power source (140) powers the motor (130). When the plates (40) are stationary, the PMs of the arrays create a steady state magnetic signature or DC magnetization. When the plates (40) are rotated by the shaft (80) by the motor (130) and gearbox at angular velocity (90), the multiple arrays create a time varying B-field or AC magnetization.
[0043]
[0044]
[0045] When the multiple non-magnetic plates (40) are arranged with their N/S poles (50) in the opposite orientation as its nearest neighbor, it reduces the net magnetic signature of the magnetic payload.
[0046]
[0047] When the multiple plates (40) are arranged with their N/S/ poles (50) with the same orientation as its nearest neighbor, it increases the net magnetic signature of the magnetic payload. The aligned configuration (180) is advantageous for the sweeping function during M-MCM operations.
Further Embodiments
[0048] The present disclosure describes an apparatus or device that includes a magnetic payload as used in M-MCM operations. The magnetic payload includes at least one of permanent magnets and multiple HTS trapped flux magnets. HTS trapped flux magnets are also sometimes referred to as HTS induced field magnets. For the purposes of clarity, brevity, and enablement of the embodiments described in this disclosure, the terms HTS trapped flux magnet and HTS induced field magnet generally have the same meaning and are used interchangeably. Likewise, for the purposes of simplicity, clarity, brevity, and enablement of the embodiments described in this disclosure, most descriptions of the embodiments in this disclosure are made using only PMs operating at ambient or near ambient temperatures, and not HTS trapped flux magnets operating at cryogenic temperatures, unless specific differences between the two are noted. It is understood by one skilled in the art, however, that a similar (though not identical) description could be used for the HTS trapped flux magnets, provided the trapped flux magnets remained at cold cryogenic temperatures below their superconducting critical temperature (T.sub.c).
[0049] One of the many advantages of the invention described in this disclosure over prior art is that the PMs (or HTS trapped flux magnets) do not require the use of any electrical power source to initially generate and maintain a static B-field or its resulting static magnetic moment (m). Once the PMs (or HTS trapped flux magnets) are initially magnetized, these PMs will retain their magnetic moments indefinitely, so long as they remain below a critical threshold temperature. Above that critical temperature, both PMs (and HTS trapped flux magnets lose their net internal magnetization and can become either non-magnetic, weakly diamagnetic, or weakly paramagnetic. If this critical threshold temperature is reached and the PMs or HTS trapped flux magnets become non-magnetic, they might no longer be useful in M-MCM devices.
[0050] For HTS trapped flux magnets, that critical temperature is typically referred to as the superconducting transition temperature (T.sub.c). The T.sub.c's of HTS material vary widely depending upon many factors, including applied pressure and applied B-field, but in general, range from about 38 K up to about 162K for most known practical HTS materials. For PMs, the threshold temperature at which the PMs lose their internal magnetic moment is known as the Curie temperature (T.sub.curie). Curie temperatures in PMs vary widely among various types of PMs, but for the rare-earth PM NdFeB magnets, one of the preferred embodiments for the PMs described in this disclosure, values typically range from about 410-500 K.
[0051] Another noteworthy difference between a PM and an HTS trapped flux magnet is the difference in magnitude of the remnant magnetic flux density B.sub.r. HTS tapped flux magnets typically have a much higher B.sub.r than PMs, depending upon the operating temperature of the HTS trapped flux magnet. As the operating temperature of the HTS tapped flux magnet approaches T.sub.c from below, the amount of trapped B-field decreases, eventually disappearing above T.sub.c. Similarly, as the operating temperature of the HTS trapped flux magnet is lowered from T.sub.c, the amount of trapped flux can similarly be increased.
[0052] It is advantageous in magnetic mine sweeping to have a large B.sub.r since it can extend the effective range of the magnetic signature of the magnetic payload. The larger the magnetic signature (i.e., effective area) of the magnetic payload, the larger its effective range to trigger MIMs. However, HTS trapped flux magnets require cryogenic cooling whereas PMs do not, and PMs can operate at room temperature and higher. The need for cryogenic cooling in HTS trapped flux magnets versus PMs presents logistical and operational challenges as well as additional costs, which must be considered when selecting the magnets for the magnetic payloads as described in this disclosure.
[0053] Another advantage of the embodiments as described in this disclosure over the prior art, is the substantially lower cost of PMs when compared to surface mounted HTS electro-magnets. When comparing material costs of PMs to HTS electro-magnets of equivalent size (e.g. 0.01 m to 0.1 m diameter), a rare-earth PM (e.g. NdFeB, SmCo, AlNiCo, etc.) tends to be significantly lower in cost per unit mass or unit volume than that of an equivalent size and magnetic moment HTS electro-magnet. Furthermore, the non-superconducting PM would not require either cryogenic cooling to keep it cold and below its T.sub.c, nor a thermally insulating vacuum cryostat to minimize heat load to the cryogenic coolant, further lowering costs.
[0054] As mentioned previously, PMs, after the initial magnetization, do not require a power source to maintain the static B-field and its corresponding static magnetic moment. Most PMs are initially magnetized in the factory where they are fabricated, thereby eliminating the need to magnetize them once installed in the magnetic payload. The cost of PMs when compared to current state of the art HTS electro-magnets is so low by comparison that the PMs could be considered expendable in some limited circumstances, if they were accidentally damaged, such as by mine detonation during mine sweeping operations. The substantially lower cost of the embodiments described herein over prior art allows for a much greater number of UUVs and expendable UUVs to be deployed in MCM operations.
[0055] The PM-MCM embodiments described in this disclosure overcome many of the disadvantages of prior art configurations. In a traditional PM, once initially magnetized there is no simple or practical method to turn off its internal magnetization (M) barring raising its temperature above T.sub.curie Raising a PM above its T.sub.curie not only requires an external heat source, but it is typically an irreversible process in which the PM may no longer retain its original internal magnetization when once again cooled below its T.sub.curie, unless it is again re-magnetized with an external magnet.
[0056] For a PM based M MCM device, the apparent inability to turn off (or at least reduce in part) its internal magnetization when not performing its mine sweeping function creates a practical logistical problem for using PMs in mine sweeping. For example, during storage and launch of the magnetic payload, the B-field emanating from the magnetic payload may interfere with nearby electrical equipment, magnetic tools, instrumentation, or even a person's heart pacemaker. This inability to turn off or even reduce its internal magnetization can create an unwanted hazard or nuisance.
[0057] From Eq. [1], the magnetic moment m=N*I*A (Am.sup.2) is directly proportional to the area (A) of the M-MCM device. The physical size of many PMs can vary substantially, with typical sizes ranging from as small as 0.0001 m up to about 0.1 m. However, even at its largest single unit size, PMs are still significantly smaller than a typical large diameter, surface mounted HTS electro-magnet (e.g., 1-2 m). Thus, a PM would have a corresponding smaller magnetic moment and hence its effective range is reduced relative to the surface mounted HTS electro-magnet. Since the effective range of most PMs is somewhat smaller due to its smaller physical size, when compared to its surface mounted HTS electro-magnet counterpart, more sweeps or passes are required by the mine sweeping vessel to cover an equivalent area of ocean. More sweeps/passes take longer to cover the same area to be cleared of mines.
[0058] For the embodiments described in this disclosure, the smaller physical size of the PM, and hence its smaller magnetic moment, can be somewhat compensated in part by using two approaches: 1) adding more PMs to an array of PMs to increase its physical size and extend its effective range of influence, and 2) using more (lower cost) mine sweeping vessels to perform the mine sweeping operation. Due to the substantially lower cost of an equivalent size and magnetic moment PM when compared to an HTS electro-magnet, multiple PMs can be spread out in an array to help extend the effective range or magnetic signature of the embodiments described in this disclosure. This, coupled with the absence of an electrical power source, makes mine sweeping operations less costly and less complex.
[0059] Second, since there is no expensive HTS wire to purchase, nor a cryogenic coolant or cryogenic refrigerator to maintain the system's temperature, nor a costly thermally insulating cryostat, nor an electrical power source, it makes adding multiple mine sweeping vessels a superior cost-effective solution when compared to a single expensive surface mounted HTS electro-magnet.
[0060] There are a wide variety of naval vessels where magnetic payload devices described in this disclosure could be used, including but not limited to submarines, USV, UUV, MSV, and other types of naval vessels. A particularly advantageous naval vessel is the UUV, where multiple UUVs, with their corresponding low cost, and possibly expendable, PM magnetic payloads can be used in a so-called swarm technique to sweep a given area.
[0061] In one embodiment, the magnetic payload device includes multiple PMs mounted onto a single plate or disk. The physical size and shape of the plate or disk include, but is not limited to, round, square, rectangular, hexagonal, multi-polygonal, among other shapes that might best suit the application and geometry of the mine sweeping vessel. To increase the effective range (i.e., magnetic signature) of the magnetic payload, multiple plates, combined with these multiple PMs per plate, can then form the magnetic payload. Furthermore, the arrangement of the PMs within each plate, combined with the orientation of the north/south poles of the PM, can be optimized to obtain the largest magnetic signature with the largest spatial extent. For the embodiments described in this disclosure, determining the optimal magnetic signature with the greatest spatial range is best accomplished by performing electro-magnetic optimization calculations prior to the fabrication thereof, and then confirming those calculations with B-field measurements once fabricated.
[0062] Thus, the total magnetic moment of the magnetic payload described in this disclosure is thus determined by several factors including, but not limited to, 1) type of PM material selected (e.g. NdFeB, SmCo, AlNiCo, etc.), 2) the total number of PMs mounted on each individual plate, 3) the total number of plates in the magnetic payload, 4) the geometrical arrangement of the PMs on each plate, and 5) the orientation of the N/S poles of the PMs among other factors.
[0063] In this disclosure, three common types of PMs (NdFeB, SmCo, and AlNiCo) are used to describe the embodiments. However, it is recognized one skilled in the art that there are many types of PMs that could be used for mounting on the plates of the magnetic payload, and nothing in the descriptions in this disclosure limit the type of PMs selected for use. For the purposes of clarity, brevity, and enablement of the embodiments described in this disclosure, the terms plates and disks generally have the same meaning, and are used interchangeably.
[0064] In one embodiment, the magnetic payload device described in this disclosure generates a DC magnetic signature or steady state magnetic moment. This DC magnetic moment can be used in mine sweeping operations. In this embodiment, no power source is needed to create the DC magnetic moment once the PM has been initially magnetized. Different types of PM materials possess different B.sub.r. There are many magnetic materials that could be used for the PMs described in this disclosure including, but not limited to, NdFeB, SmCo, AlNiCo, and other types of PMs. Likewise, there are a plethora of superconducting materials that could be used for the superconducting trapped flux magnets described in this disclosure including, but not limited to, BiSCaCuO, ReBaCuO, TlBaCaCuO, MgB, NbTi, NbSn, NbAl, NbN, NbGe, and other types of superconducting materials.
[0065] In one embodiment, the magnetic payload device described in this disclosure generates a dB/dt or an AC magnetic signature. To generate an AC magnetic signature, at least one of the individual PMs and the plates containing the multiple PMs are rotated about an axis to create a dB/dt, resulting in an AC magnetic signature. For the purposes of clarity, brevity, and enablement of the embodiments described in this disclosure, the term axis of rotation or simply axis refers to the shaft that is mechanically coupled to both the motor and the plates that house the PMs. The shaft can be made of metal, composite, high strength plastic, and other types of materials.
[0066] The AC frequency at which the magnetic payload operates can be adjusted or tuned as needed to obtain the most effective mine sweeping frequency. The AC frequency (o) at which the individual PMs or the plates containing the array of multiple PMs are rotated can be at a constant/fixed frequency, a variable frequency, or a combination of constant and variable rotational frequencies. Rotating the individual PMs or the plates containing the array of multiple PMs requires, in some embodiments, a motor and a power source such as a battery.
[0067] There are many motor types that could be used to rotate the individual PMs or the array of multiple PMs including, but not limited to, electric motors, wax motors, pneumatic motors, hydraulic motors, and other types of motors. To increase the amount of torque applied by the motor to rotate the shaft containing the magnetic plates, a gearbox mechanically coupled to the motor could also be used in combination with the motor and power source, in some embodiments.
[0068] In another embodiment, the magnetic payload device described in this disclosure includes a combination of both DC and AC magnetic signatures.
[0069] In yet another embodiment, an AC magnetic signature or time varying B-field can be created by the mine sweeping vessel without the use of a motor and battery power source located in the magnetic payload. In this embodiment, the mine sweeping vessel, having a fixed array of multiple PMs, is rotated about is central axis at a desired frequency or multiple frequencies. In this embodiment, the preferred mine sweeping vessel is a UUV that can be remotely guided or controlled. In this embodiment, the magnetic payload remains fixed while the UUV itself provides both the forward propulsion and the ability to spin/rotate about its axis.
[0070] In one embodiment, all of the magnetic plates of the magnetic payload are aligned in a parallel arrangement so that their corresponding N/S poles vectorially add, thus creating the largest possible magnetic moment. This embodiment is useful during the sweep function of M-MCM operations. For the purposes of clarity, brevity, and enablement for the embodiments described in this disclosure, this arrangement is referred to as the parallel or aligned configuration.
[0071] In another embodiment, every other magnetic plate of the magnetic payload is rotated by substantially 180. In this configuration, the plates are aligned in a so-called anti-parallel or anti-aligned arrangement with its nearest neighbor, so that their corresponding N/S poles vectorially cancel, thus creating the smallest possible magnetic moment. This embodiment is most useful during the storage and launch function of M-MCM operations, For the purposes of clarity, brevity, and enablement for the embodiments described in this disclosure, this arrangement is referred to as the anti-parallel or anti-aligned configuration.
[0072] As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C means all possible combinations of none or multiple instances of each of A, B, and C, but at least one A, or one B, or one C. For example, and without limitation: A1, A2+B1, C2, A1+B1+C1, A7+B12+C113. It does not mean A0+B0+C0.
[0073] The foregoing description of embodiments for this invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments are chosen and described in an effort to provide illustrations of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.